Proposed Modification of Area Navigation Route T-288; WY, 76070-76072 [2011-31223]
Download as PDF
76070
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 97 helicopters of U.S.
registry. We estimate that it would take
about 1.0 work-hour per helicopter to do
the inspection, at an average labor rate
of $85 per work hour. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$8,245, or $85 per product. If debonding
is found, we estimate that it would take
about 2 work-hours to replace the main
rotor blade, and required parts would
cost $114,182, for a cost of $114,352. We
have no way of determining how many
operators would incur these costs.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. Additionally, this proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that a regulatory
distinction is required; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the AD docket to
examine the economic evaluation.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 Dec 05, 2011
Jkt 226001
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed
in European Aviation Safety Agency AD
2010–0216–E, dated October 21, 2010
(corrected October 29, 2010).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by Reference,
Safety.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November
29, 2011.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
[FR Doc. 2011–31254 Filed 12–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
14 CFR Part 71
1. The authority citation for Part 39
continues to read as follows:
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1193; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ANM–14]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH: Docket No.
FAA–2011–1285; Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–073–AD.
Applicability: Model BO–105A, BO–105C,
BO–105LS A–1, BO–105LS A–3, and BO–
105S helicopters, all serial numbers, with a
main rotor blade, part number (P/N) 105–
15103, 105–15141, 105–15141V001, 105–
15143, 105–15150, 105–15150V001, 105–
15152, 105–81013, 105–87214, 1120–15101,
or 1120–15103; where the main rotor blade
erosion protective shell was replaced
between September 2006 and March 2010;
certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required within 50 hours
time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date
of this AD, unless accomplished previously.
To detect debonding of the main rotor
blade erosion protective shell, which could
lead to an unbalanced main rotor, high
vibration, damage to the tail boom or tail
rotor, and loss of control of the helicopter,
accomplish the following:
(a) Inspect the main rotor blade for
debonding of the erosion protective shell. If
debonding is detected during the inspection,
before further flight, replace the main rotor
blade with an airworthy main rotor blade.
Note 1: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No.
BO105–10–124, Revision 1, dated October
18, 2010, and No. BO105LS–10–12, Revision
1, dated October 20, 2010, which are not
incorporated by reference, contain additional
information about the subject of this AD.
(b) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Regulations and
Policy Group, FAA, ATTN: Jim Grigg,
Manager, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137; telephone: (817) 222–5122; fax:
(817) 222–5126, for information about
previously approved alternative methods of
compliance.
(c) The Joint Aircraft System/Component
Code is 6210: Main Rotor Blades.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Proposed Modification of Area
Navigation Route T–288; WY
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
modify low altitude area navigation
(RNAV) route T–288 by extending the
route westward from the Rapid City, SD,
VORTAC to the Gillette, WY, VOR/
DME. The proposed extension would
enhance efficiency and safety of the
National Airspace System (NAS) by
supplementing the existing VOR Federal
airway structure in that area.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone:
(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA
Docket No. FAA–2011–1193 and
Airspace Docket No. 11–ANM–14 at the
beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Gallant, Airspace, Regulations and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2011–1193 and Airspace Docket No. 11–
ANM–14) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA–2011–1193 and
Airspace Docket No. 11–ANM–14.’’ The
postcard will be date/time stamped and
returned to the commenter.
All communications received on or
before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before
taking action on the proposed rule. The
proposal contained in this action may
be changed in light of comments
received. All comments submitted will
be available for examination in the
public docket both before and after the
closing date for comments. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned
with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s web page at https://
www.faa.gov, or the Federal Register’s
Web page at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
fr/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Western Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind
Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRM’s should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 Dec 05, 2011
Jkt 226001
(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory
Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which
describes the application procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 71 to modify RNAV route
T–288 by adding a new segment
between the Rapid City, SD VORTAC
and the Gillette, WY VOR/DME. The
modification would enhance the
efficiency and safety of the NAS by
supplementing the existing VOR Federal
airway structure and providing
alternative routing in the event of
navigation aid (NAVAID) outages. The
minimum IFR altitude in the area varies
between 7,000 feet MSL and 9,300 feet
MSL; however, the radar coverage in
that area is not reliable below 12,000
feet MSL to 13,000 feet MSL. When
NAVAID outages occur, due to the
existing route and NAVAID structure, it
is difficult to route aircraft between the
Gillette VOR/DME and the Rapid City
VORTAC. In this situation, aircraft
flying at lower altitudes must climb up
to be within radar coverage in order to
get a more direct route to/from the VOR/
DME and VORTAC. This is especially
important during winter months
because pilots encountering icing
conditions at the higher altitudes need
to descend, but are then lost from radar
coverage. The proposed T–288
modification would alleviate this
situation as well as enhance the NAS
efficiency by adding an RNAV route
option.
Low altitude RNAV routes are
published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011
and effective September 15, 2011, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The RNAV route listed in this
document would be published
subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1)
Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76071
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it expands RNAV route coverage to
enhance the safe and efficient flow of
traffic in the western United States.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a and 311b. This airspace
action is not expected to cause any
potentially significant environmental
impacts, and no extraordinary
circumstances exist that warrant
preparation of an environmental
assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9V,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 9, 2011 and
effective September 15, 2011, is
amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
76072
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph 6011 United States Area
Navigation Routes.
*
*
*
*
*
T–288 Gillette, WY (GCC) to Wolbach, NE
Gillette, WY (GCC) ........................................
KARAS, ..........................................................
Rapid City, SD (RAP) ....................................
WNDED, SD ...................................................
Valentine, NE (VTN) .....................................
Ainsworth, NE (ANW) ..................................
FESNT, NE ....................................................
Wolbach, NE (OBH) ......................................
*
*
*
*
(OBH) [Amended]
VOR/DME ......................................................
INT .................................................................
VORTAC ........................................................
WP .................................................................
NDB ...............................................................
VOR/DME ......................................................
WP .................................................................
VORTAC ........................................................
*
Issued in Washington, DC on November 29,
2011.
Gary A. Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and
ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2011–31223 Filed 12–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 740, 742 and 774
[Docket No. 111020646–1645–01]
RIN 0694–AF41
Revisions to the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR): Control of Gas
Turbine Engines and Related Items the
President Determines No Longer
Warrant Control Under the United
States Munitions List (USML)
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Industry and
Security publishes this proposed rule
that describes how military gas turbine
engines and related articles that the
President determines no longer warrant
control under Category VI, VII, or VIII of
the United States Munitions List
(USML) would be controlled under the
Commerce Control List (CCL) in new
Export Control Classification Numbers
(ECCNs) 9A619, 9B619, 9C619, 9D619
and 9E619. In addition, this proposed
rule would control military trainer
aircraft turbo prop engines and related
items, which are currently controlled
under ECCN 9A018.a.2 or .a.3, 9D018 or
9E018, under new ECCN 9A619, 9D619
or 9E619.
This rule is one of a planned series of
proposed rules that are part of the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Dec 05, 2011
Jkt 226001
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
Administration’s Export Control Reform
Initiative under which various types of
articles presently controlled on the
USML under the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) would,
instead, be controlled on the CCL in
accordance with the requirements of the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR), if and after the President
determines that such articles no longer
warrant control on the USML. This
proposed rule is being published in
conjunction with a proposed rule from
the Department of State, Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls that would
consolidate in USML Category XIX the
military gas turbine engines and related
articles that would remain on the
USML.
Comments must be received by
January 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The identification
number for this rulemaking is BIS–
2011–0042.
• By email directly to:
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include
RIN 0694–AF41 in the subject line.
• By mail or delivery to: Regulatory
Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Room 2099B, 14th Street and
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230. Refer to RIN 0694–AF41.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene Christiansen, Office of National
Security and Technology Transfer
Controls, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Telephone: (202) 482–2984, Email:
Gene.Christiansen@bis.doc.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 15, 2011, as part of the
Administration’s ongoing Export
Control Reform Initiative, the Bureau of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44°20′52″
44°16′23″
43°58′34″
43°19′14″
42°51′42″
42°34′09″
42°03′57″
41°22′33″
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
105°32′37″ W.)
104°18′50″ W.)
103°00′44″ W)
101°32′19″ W.)
100°32′59″ W.)
99°59′23″ W.)
99°17′18″ W.)
98°21′13″ W.)
Industry and Security (BIS) published a
proposed rule (76 FR 41958) (‘‘the July
15 proposed rule’’) that set forth a
framework for how articles the
President determines, in accordance
with section 38(f) of the Arms Export
Control Act (AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2778(f)),
would no longer warrant control on the
United States Munitions List (USML)
and, instead, would be controlled on the
Commerce Control List (CCL). The July
15 proposed rule also contained a
proposal by BIS describing how military
vehicles and related articles in USML
Category VII that no longer warrant
control under the USML would be
controlled on the CCL.
On November 7, 2011 (76 FR 68675),
BIS published a proposed rule
describing how aircraft and related
items determined by the President to no
longer warrant control under the USML
would be controlled on the CCL. In that
proposed rule, BIS also made several
changes and additions to the framework
proposed in the July 15 proposed rule.
BIS plans to publish additional
proposed rules describing how surface
vessels and related articles (currently
controlled under USML Category VI)
and submersibles, submarines, and
related articles (currently controlled by
USML Category VI or XX) that the
President determines no longer warrant
control on the USML would be
controlled on the CCL.
BIS also plans to publish a proposed
rule describing how the new controls
described in this and similar notices
would be implemented, such as through
the use of ‘‘grandfather’’ clauses and
additional exceptions. The goal of such
provisions would be to give exporters
sufficient time to implement the final
versions of such changes and to avoid,
to the extent possible, situations where
transactions would require licenses
from both the State Department and the
Commerce Department.
E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM
06DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76070-76072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31223]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1193; Airspace Docket No. 11-ANM-14]
Proposed Modification of Area Navigation Route T-288; WY
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify low altitude area navigation
(RNAV) route T-288 by extending the route westward from the Rapid City,
SD, VORTAC to the Gillette, WY, VOR/DME. The proposed extension would
enhance efficiency and safety of the National Airspace System (NAS) by
supplementing the existing VOR Federal airway structure in that area.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001; telephone: (202) 366-9826. You must identify
FAA Docket No. FAA-2011-1193 and Airspace Docket No. 11-ANM-14 at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace, Regulations
and ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire.
[[Page 76071]]
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2011-1193 and Airspace Docket No. 11-ANM-14) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2011-1193 and Airspace Docket No. 11-ANM-14.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov, or the Federal Register's Web page at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Western Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057.
Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267-9677,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to modify RNAV route T-288 by adding a new
segment between the Rapid City, SD VORTAC and the Gillette, WY VOR/DME.
The modification would enhance the efficiency and safety of the NAS by
supplementing the existing VOR Federal airway structure and providing
alternative routing in the event of navigation aid (NAVAID) outages.
The minimum IFR altitude in the area varies between 7,000 feet MSL and
9,300 feet MSL; however, the radar coverage in that area is not
reliable below 12,000 feet MSL to 13,000 feet MSL. When NAVAID outages
occur, due to the existing route and NAVAID structure, it is difficult
to route aircraft between the Gillette VOR/DME and the Rapid City
VORTAC. In this situation, aircraft flying at lower altitudes must
climb up to be within radar coverage in order to get a more direct
route to/from the VOR/DME and VORTAC. This is especially important
during winter months because pilots encountering icing conditions at
the higher altitudes need to descend, but are then lost from radar
coverage. The proposed T-288 modification would alleviate this
situation as well as enhance the NAS efficiency by adding an RNAV route
option.
Low altitude RNAV routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011 and effective September 15, 2011,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV route
listed in this document would be published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it expands RNAV route coverage to enhance the safe and efficient
flow of traffic in the western United States.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a and 311b. This airspace action is not
expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts,
and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 9,
2011 and effective September 15, 2011, is amended as follows:
[[Page 76072]]
Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes.
* * * * *
T-288 Gillette, WY (GCC) to Wolbach, NE (OBH) [Amended]
Gillette, WY (GCC).......... VOR/DME............. (Lat. 44[deg]20'52'' N., long. 105[deg]32'37'' W.)
KARAS,...................... INT................. (Lat. 44[deg]16'23'' N., long. 104[deg]18'50'' W.)
Rapid City, SD (RAP)........ VORTAC.............. (Lat. 43[deg]58'34'' N., long. 103[deg]00'44'' W)
WNDED, SD................... WP.................. (Lat. 43[deg]19'14'' N., long. 101[deg]32'19'' W.)
Valentine, NE (VTN)......... NDB................. (Lat. 42[deg]51'42'' N., long. 100[deg]32'59'' W.)
Ainsworth, NE (ANW)......... VOR/DME............. (Lat. 42[deg]34'09'' N., long. 99[deg]59'23'' W.)
FESNT, NE................... WP.................. (Lat. 42[deg]03'57'' N., long. 99[deg]17'18'' W.)
Wolbach, NE (OBH)........... VORTAC.............. (Lat. 41[deg]22'33'' N., long. 98[deg]21'13'' W.)
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC on November 29, 2011.
Gary A. Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2011-31223 Filed 12-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P