Information Collection Being Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval, 75878-75879 [2011-31143]
Download as PDF
75878
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Western’s need for agency action in
response to Basin Electric’s request to
eliminate the average 50-MW operating
limit is distinct from Basin Electric’s
need to provide additional peaking
energy. Language added in the Final EIS
in Section 1.2 noting that the station
does not gain any additional peaking
generation capability is correct. While
there is a need for additional peaking
resource to serve projected additional
member load growth, the capability of
the Groton Generation Station would
remain at 200 MW with Western’s
proposed action.
EPA’s comment letter encouraged the
disclosure and consideration of
potential indirect effects from increased
or decreased natural gas production for
the Groton Generation Station. While
Western acknowledges the potential for
indirect effects from continued natural
gas production and use, Western
explained in the Final EIS that natural
gas production would not be increased
to serve additional output of the Groton
Generation Station because the capacity
of the natural gas production system
meets the needs of the Groton
Generation Station at full output. In
addition, any gas not currently used by
the station under the 50-MW average
limit is provided to the market.
Lastly, EPA recommended disclosure
of the temperature impairments at Lake
Sharpe, along with acknowledgement
that additional withdrawals, although
small, may cumulatively contribute to
this impairment unless demonstrated
otherwise. In the Final EIS, Western
indicated that the additional 15-acrefeet consumed by the Groton Generation
Station under Western’s proposed
Federal action would be minuscule
compared to the water level of Lake
Oahe, corresponding to a lack of
subsequent temperature effect of Lake
Sharpe. However, Western does
acknowledge EPA’s comment.
Decision
Western’s decision is to modify its
LGIA with Basin Electric to eliminate
the 50-MW annual average operating
limit,1 allowing operation up to the
limits imposed by the current Title V air
quality control operating permit.
Western’s decision to modify its LGIA
with Basin Electric is based on
providing open access under its Tariff
and satisfying Basin Electric’s objectives
while recognizing there will be minimal
harm to the environment.
This decision is based on the
information contained in the
1 Western’s
authority to issue a record of decision
is pursuant to authority delegated on October 4,
1999, from the Assistant Secretary for Environment,
Safety and Health to Western’s Administrator.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 02, 2011
Jkt 226001
Modification of the Groton Generation
Station Interconnection Agreement
Final EIS (DOE/EIS–0435). This Record
of Decision was prepared pursuant to
the requirements of the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts
1500–1508) and DOE’s Procedures for
Implementing NEPA (10 CFR part 1021).
Dated: November 18, 2011.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–31124 Filed 12–2–11; 8:45 am]
Closed Session *
• Office of Examination Supervisory
and Oversight Activities.
Dated: November 30, 2011.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2011–31319 Filed 12–1–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Information Collection Being
Submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for Review and Approval
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
AGENCY:
Farm Credit Administration Board;
Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting
AGENCY:
Farm Credit Administration.
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the Government in the
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of
the regular meeting of the Farm Credit
Administration Board (Board).
SUMMARY:
The regular meeting of
the Board will be held at the offices of
the Farm Credit Administration in
McLean, Virginia, on December 8, 2011,
from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board
concludes its business.
DATE AND TIME:
Dale
L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883–
4009, TTY (703) 883–4056.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Farm Credit
Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive,
McLean, Virginia 22102–5090.
ADDRESSES:
Parts of
this meeting of the Board will be open
to the public (limited space available),
and parts will be closed to the public.
In order to increase the accessibility to
Board meetings, persons requiring
assistance should make arrangements in
advance. The matters to be considered
at the meeting are:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Open Session
A. Approval of Minutes
• November 9, 2011.
B. New Business
• Senior Officer Compensation
Disclosures and Related Topics—
Proposed Rule.
C. Reports
• Semi-Annual Report on Office of
Examination Operations.
• Quarterly Report on Farm Credit
System Condition.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burden and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501—
3520), the Federal Communications
Commission invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s).
Comments are requested concerning: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to
further reduce the information burden
for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or January 4, 2012. If you
anticipate that you will be submitting
PRA comments, but find it difficult to
do so within the period of time allowed
by this notice, you should advise the
SUMMARY:
* Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(8) and (9).
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2011 / Notices
FCC contact listed below as soon as
possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments
to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via fax at
(202) 395–5167 or via Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Benish Shah, Federal
Communications Commission, via the
Internet at Benish.Shah@fcc.gov. To
submit your PRA comments by email
send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benish Shah, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418–7866.
OMB Approval Number: 3060–0329.
Title: Section 2.955, Equipment
Authorization-Verification (Retention of
Records).
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit and not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 5,655
respondents; 5,655 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 18
hours (average).
Frequency of Response: One time and
on occasion reporting requirements,
recordkeeping requirement; and Third
party disclosure requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in 47 U.S.C. Sections 4(i),
302, 303(g), and 303(r) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended; 47 U.S.C. sections 154(i), 302
and 303(r).
Total Annual Burden: 101,790 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $1,131,000.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Commission rules require equipment
testing to determine performance and
compliance with FCC standards. This
testing is typically done by independent
testing laboratories whose measurement
facility has been reviewed by the
Commission, or by an accrediting
organization recognized by the
Commission.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (no change
in reporting requirements), after this 60
day comment period to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in order
to obtain the full three year clearance.
Section 2.955 describes for each
equipment device subject to
verification, the responsible party, as
shown in 47 CFR 2.909 shall maintain
the records listed as follows:
(1) A record of the original design
drawings and specifications and all
changes that have been made that may
affect compliance with the requirements
of § 2.953.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 02, 2011
Jkt 226001
(2) A record of the procedures used
for production inspection and testing (if
tests were performed) to insure the
conformance required by § 2.953.
(Statistical production line emission
testing is not required.)
(3) A record of the measurements
made on an appropriate test site that
demonstrates compliance with the
applicable regulations in this chapter.
The record shall:
(i) Indicate the actual date all testing
was performed;
(ii) State the name of the test
laboratory, company, or individual
performing the verification testing. The
Commission may request additional
information regarding the test site, the
test equipment or the qualifications of
the company or individual performing
the verification tests;
(iii) Contain a description of how the
device was actually tested, identifying
the measurement procedure and test
equipment that was used;
(iv) Contain a description of the
equipment under test (EUT) and support
equipment connected to, or installed
within, the EUT;
(v) Identify the EUT and support
equipment by trade name and model
number and, if appropriate, by FCC
Identifier and serial number;
(vi) Indicate the types and lengths of
connecting cables used and how they
were arranged or moved during testing;
(vii) Contain at least two drawings or
photographs showing the test set-up for
the highest line conducted emission and
showing the test set-up for the highest
radiated emission. These drawings or
photographs must show enough detail
to confirm other information contained
in the test report. Any photographs used
must be focused originals without glare
or dark spots and must clearly show the
test configuration used;
(viii) List all modifications, if any,
made to the EUT by the testing company
or individual to achieve compliance
with the regulations in this chapter;
(ix) Include all of the data required to
show compliance with the appropriate
regulations in this chapter; and
(x) Contain, on the test report, the
signature of the individual responsible
for testing the product along with the
name and signature of an official of the
responsible party, as designated in
§ 2.909.
(4) For equipment subject to the
provisions in part 15 of this chapter, the
records shall indicate if the equipment
was verified pursuant to the transition
provisions contained in § 15.37 of this
chapter.
(b) The records listed in paragraph (a)
of this section shall be retained for two
years after the manufacture of said
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
75879
equipment item has been permanently
discontinued, or until the conclusion of
an investigation or a proceeding if the
manufacturer or importer is officially
notified that an investigation or any
other administrative proceeding
involving his equipment has been
instituted.
The Commission needs and requires
the information under FCC Rules at 47
CFR parts 15 and 18, that RF equipment
manufacturers (respondents) ‘‘self
determine’’ their responsibility for
adherence to these rules, as guided by
the following criteria:
(a) Whether the RF equipment device
that is being marketed complies with
the applicable Commission Rules; and
(b) If the operation of the equipment
is consistent with the initially
documented test results, as reported to
the Commission.
The information collection is essential
to controlling potential interference to
radio communications.
(a) Companies that manufacture RF
equipment are the anticipated
respondents to this information
collection.
(b) This respondent ‘‘public’’
generally remains the same, although
the types of equipment devices that they
manufacture may change in response to
changing technologies and to new
spectrum allocations made by the
Commission.
(c) In addition, the Commission may
establish new technical operating
standards in response to these changing
technologies and in allocation spectrum,
which these RF equipment
manufacturers must meet to receive
their equipment authorization from the
FCC.
(d) However, the process that RF
equipment manufacturers must follow
to verify their compliance, as mandated
by 47 CFR Section 2.955 of FCC Rules,
will not change despite new technical
standards established for specific
equipment.
This information collection, therefore,
applies to a variety of equipment, which
is currently manufactured in the future,
and that operates under varying
technical standards.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–31143 Filed 12–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75878-75879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31143]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review and Approval
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501--3520), the Federal Communications Commission invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on the following information collection(s). Comments are requested
concerning: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e)
ways to further reduce the information burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person
shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection
of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does
not display a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or January 4, 2012. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within the
period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the
[[Page 75879]]
FCC contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via fax at (202) 395-5167 or via Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Benish Shah, Federal
Communications Commission, via the Internet at Benish.Shah@fcc.gov. To
submit your PRA comments by email send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benish Shah, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418-7866.
OMB Approval Number: 3060-0329.
Title: Section 2.955, Equipment Authorization-Verification
(Retention of Records).
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit and not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 5,655 respondents; 5,655 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 18 hours (average).
Frequency of Response: One time and on occasion reporting
requirements, recordkeeping requirement; and Third party disclosure
requirements.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47
U.S.C. Sections 4(i), 302, 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended; 47 U.S.C. sections 154(i), 302 and 303(r).
Total Annual Burden: 101,790 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $1,131,000.
Privacy Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Commission rules require
equipment testing to determine performance and compliance with FCC
standards. This testing is typically done by independent testing
laboratories whose measurement facility has been reviewed by the
Commission, or by an accrediting organization recognized by the
Commission.
Needs and Uses: This collection will be submitted as an extension
(no change in reporting requirements), after this 60 day comment period
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in order to obtain the
full three year clearance.
Section 2.955 describes for each equipment device subject to
verification, the responsible party, as shown in 47 CFR 2.909 shall
maintain the records listed as follows:
(1) A record of the original design drawings and specifications and
all changes that have been made that may affect compliance with the
requirements of Sec. 2.953.
(2) A record of the procedures used for production inspection and
testing (if tests were performed) to insure the conformance required by
Sec. 2.953. (Statistical production line emission testing is not
required.)
(3) A record of the measurements made on an appropriate test site
that demonstrates compliance with the applicable regulations in this
chapter. The record shall:
(i) Indicate the actual date all testing was performed;
(ii) State the name of the test laboratory, company, or individual
performing the verification testing. The Commission may request
additional information regarding the test site, the test equipment or
the qualifications of the company or individual performing the
verification tests;
(iii) Contain a description of how the device was actually tested,
identifying the measurement procedure and test equipment that was used;
(iv) Contain a description of the equipment under test (EUT) and
support equipment connected to, or installed within, the EUT;
(v) Identify the EUT and support equipment by trade name and model
number and, if appropriate, by FCC Identifier and serial number;
(vi) Indicate the types and lengths of connecting cables used and
how they were arranged or moved during testing;
(vii) Contain at least two drawings or photographs showing the test
set-up for the highest line conducted emission and showing the test
set-up for the highest radiated emission. These drawings or photographs
must show enough detail to confirm other information contained in the
test report. Any photographs used must be focused originals without
glare or dark spots and must clearly show the test configuration used;
(viii) List all modifications, if any, made to the EUT by the
testing company or individual to achieve compliance with the
regulations in this chapter;
(ix) Include all of the data required to show compliance with the
appropriate regulations in this chapter; and
(x) Contain, on the test report, the signature of the individual
responsible for testing the product along with the name and signature
of an official of the responsible party, as designated in Sec. 2.909.
(4) For equipment subject to the provisions in part 15 of this
chapter, the records shall indicate if the equipment was verified
pursuant to the transition provisions contained in Sec. 15.37 of this
chapter.
(b) The records listed in paragraph (a) of this section shall be
retained for two years after the manufacture of said equipment item has
been permanently discontinued, or until the conclusion of an
investigation or a proceeding if the manufacturer or importer is
officially notified that an investigation or any other administrative
proceeding involving his equipment has been instituted.
The Commission needs and requires the information under FCC Rules
at 47 CFR parts 15 and 18, that RF equipment manufacturers
(respondents) ``self determine'' their responsibility for adherence to
these rules, as guided by the following criteria:
(a) Whether the RF equipment device that is being marketed complies
with the applicable Commission Rules; and
(b) If the operation of the equipment is consistent with the
initially documented test results, as reported to the Commission.
The information collection is essential to controlling potential
interference to radio communications.
(a) Companies that manufacture RF equipment are the anticipated
respondents to this information collection.
(b) This respondent ``public'' generally remains the same, although
the types of equipment devices that they manufacture may change in
response to changing technologies and to new spectrum allocations made
by the Commission.
(c) In addition, the Commission may establish new technical
operating standards in response to these changing technologies and in
allocation spectrum, which these RF equipment manufacturers must meet
to receive their equipment authorization from the FCC.
(d) However, the process that RF equipment manufacturers must
follow to verify their compliance, as mandated by 47 CFR Section 2.955
of FCC Rules, will not change despite new technical standards
established for specific equipment.
This information collection, therefore, applies to a variety of
equipment, which is currently manufactured in the future, and that
operates under varying technical standards.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-31143 Filed 12-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P