Agency Information Collection Activities: Solicitation of Proposal Information for Award of Public Contracts, 75890-75892 [2011-31062]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
75890
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2011 / Notices
Incorporated; LabOne, Inc.; Center for
Laboratory Services, a Division of
LabOne, Inc.,).
Maxxam Analytics*, 6740 Campobello
Road, Mississauga, ON, Canada L5N
2L8, (905) 817–5700, (Formerly:
Maxxam Analytics Inc., NOVAMANN
(Ontario), Inc.).
MedTox Laboratories, Inc., 402 W.
County Road D, St. Paul, MN 55112,
(651) 636–7466/(800) 832–3244.
MetroLab-Legacy Laboratory Services,
1225 NE 2nd Ave., Portland, OR
97232, (503) 413–5295/(800) 950–
5295.
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, Forensic Toxicology
Laboratory, 1 Veterans Drive,
Minneapolis, MN 55417, (612) 725–
2088.
National Toxicology Laboratories, Inc.,
1100 California Ave., Bakersfield, CA
93304, (661) 322–4250/(800) 350–
3515.
One Source Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.,
1213 Genoa-Red Bluff, Pasadena, TX
77504, (888) 747–3774, (Formerly:
University of Texas Medical Branch,
Clinical Chemistry Division; UTMB
Pathology-Toxicology Laboratory).
Pacific Toxicology Laboratories, 9348
DeSoto Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311,
(800) 328–6942, (Formerly: Centinela
Hospital Airport Toxicology
Laboratory).
Pathology Associates Medical
Laboratories, 110 West Cliff Dr.,
Spokane, WA 99204, (509) 755–8991/
(800) 541–7891 x7.
Phamatech, Inc., 10151 Barnes Canyon
Road, San Diego, CA 92121, (858)
643–5555.
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 1777
Montreal Circle, Tucker, GA 30084,
(800) 729–6432, (Formerly:
SmithKline Beecham Clinical
Laboratories; SmithKline Bio-Science
Laboratories).
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 400
Egypt Road, Norristown, PA 19403,
(610) 631–4600/(877) 642–2216,
(Formerly: SmithKline Beecham
Clinical Laboratories; SmithKline BioScience Laboratories).
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, 8401
Fallbrook Ave., West Hills, CA 91304,
(800) 877–2520, (Formerly:
SmithKline Beecham Clinical
Laboratories).
S.E.D. Medical Laboratories, 5601 Office
Blvd., Albuquerque, NM 87109, (505)
727–6300/(800) 999–5227.
South Bend Medical Foundation, Inc.,
530 N. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend,
IN 46601, (574) 234–4176 x1276.
Southwest Laboratories, 4625 E. Cotton
Center Boulevard, Suite 177, Phoenix,
AZ 85040, (602) 438–8507/(800) 279–
0027.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 02, 2011
Jkt 226001
St. Anthony Hospital Toxicology
Laboratory, 1000 N. Lee St.,
Oklahoma City, OK 73101, (405) 272–
7052.
STERLING Reference Laboratories, 2617
East L Street, Tacoma, WA 98421,
(800) 442–0438.
Toxicology & Drug Monitoring
Laboratory, University of Missouri
Hospital & Clinics, 301 Business Loop
70 West, Suite 208, Columbia, MO
65203, (573) 882–1273.
Toxicology Testing Service, Inc., 5426
NW. 79th Ave., Miami, FL 33166,
(305) 593–2260.
U.S. Army Forensic Toxicology Drug
Testing Laboratory, 2490 Wilson St.,
Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755–
5235, (301) 677–7085.
*The Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
voted to end its Laboratory Accreditation
Program for Substance Abuse (LAPSA)
effective May 12, 1998. Laboratories certified
through that program were accredited to
conduct forensic urine drug testing as
required by U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) regulations. As of that
date, the certification of those accredited
Canadian laboratories will continue under
DOT authority. The responsibility for
conducting quarterly performance testing
plus periodic on-site inspections of those
LAPSA-accredited laboratories was
transferred to the U.S. HHS, with the HHS’
NLCP contractor continuing to have an active
role in the performance testing and
laboratory inspection processes. Other
Canadian laboratories wishing to be
considered for the NLCP may apply directly
to the NLCP contractor just as U.S.
laboratories do.
Upon finding a Canadian laboratory to be
qualified, HHS will recommend that DOT
certify the laboratory (Federal Register, July
16, 1996) as meeting the minimum standards
of the Mandatory Guidelines published in the
Federal Register on April 30, 2010 (75 FR
22809). After receiving DOT certification, the
laboratory will be included in the monthly
list of HHS-certified laboratories and
participate in the NLCP certification
maintenance program.
Janine Denis Cook,
Chemist, Division of Workplace Programs,
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention,
CAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 2011–31059 Filed 12–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Solicitation of Proposal
Information for Award of Public
Contracts
Office of the Chief Procurement
Officer, DHS.
ACTION: 30-Day Notice and request for
comments; Extension without change of
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a currently approved collection, 1600–
0005.
The Department of Homeland
Security, Office of the Chief
Procurement Officer, will submit the
following information collection request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and clearance
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (P.L. 104–13, 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). DHS previously
published this information collection
request (ICR) in the Federal Register on
August 31, 2011 at 76 FR 54243, for a
60-day public comment period. No
comments were received by DHS. The
purpose of this notice is to allow
additional 30-days for public comments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until January 4, 2012.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to OMB Desk Officer, Department of
Homeland Security and sent via
electronic mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed
to (202) 395–5806.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
additional information is required
contact: The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), Office of Chief
Procurement Officer, Acquisition Policy
and Legislation Office, DHS Attn.:
Camara Francis, Department of
Homeland Security, Office of the Chief
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2011 / Notices
Procurement Officer, Room 3114,
Washington, DC 20528,
Camara.Francis@hq.dhs.gov, (202) 447–
5904.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) and the Office of the Chief
Procurement Officer (OCPO) collect
information when inviting firms to
submit bids, proposals, and offers for
public contracts for supplies and
services. The information collection is
necessary for compliance with the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR);
48 CFR Chapter 1, the Federal Property
and Administrative Services Act
(Division C of Title 41), under the Small
Business Innovative Research (SBIR)
and Small Business Technology
Transfer (STTR) programs 15 U.S.C.
628.
For solicitations to contract made
through a variety of means, whether
conducted orally or in writing,
contracting officers normally request
information from prospective offerors
such as pricing information, delivery
schedule compliance, and whether the
offeror has the resources (both human
and financial) to accomplish
requirements. Examples of the kinds of
information collected can be found in
the FAR at FAR 13.106–1, 13.106–3,
13.302–1, –3, –5, subpart 13.5, subpart
14.2, subpart 15.2, subpart 6.1, and
subpart 35.
Examples where collections of
information occur in soliciting for
supplies/services include the issuance
of draft Requests for Proposal (RFP),
Requests for Information (RFI), and
Broad Agency Announcements (BAA).
The Government generally issues an
RFP using the uniform contract format
(FAR 15.204–1) with the intent of
awarding a contract to one or more
prospective offerors. The RFP can
require those interested in making an
offer to provide information in the
following areas: schedule (FAR 15.204–
2); contract clauses (FAR 15.204–3); list
of documents, exhibits and other
attachments (FAR 15.204–4) or
representations and instructions
(15.204–5).
FAR 15.201(e) authorizes agencies to
issue RFIs when an agency ‘‘does not
presently intend to award a contract, but
wants to obtain price, delivery, other
market information, or capabilities for
planning purposes’’. RFIs solicit
responses from the public. Similarly,
FAR 35.106 authorizes Federal agencies
to use BAAs to ‘‘fulfill their
requirements for scientific study and
experimentation directed toward
advancing the state-of-the-art or
increasing knowledge or understanding
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 02, 2011
Jkt 226001
rather than focusing on a specific
system or hardware solution.’’
The DHS Science and Technology
(S&T) Directorate issues BAAs soliciting
white papers and proposals from the
public. DHS S&T evaluates white papers
and proposals received from the public
in response to a DHS S&T BAA using
the evaluation criteria specified in the
BAA through a peer or scientific review
process in accordance with FAR
35.016(d). White paper evaluation
determines those research ideas that
merit submission of a full proposal and
proposal evaluation determines those
proposals that merit selection for
contract award. Unclassified white
papers and proposals are typically
collected via the DHS S&T BAA secure
Web site, while classified white papers
and proposals must be submitted via
proper classified courier or proper
classified mailing procedures as
described in the National Industrial
Security Program Operating Manual
(NSPOM).
Federal agencies with an annual
extramural research and development
(R&D) budget exceeding $100 million
are required to participate in the SBIR
Program. Similarly, Federal agencies
with an extramural R&D budget
exceeding $1 billion are required to
participate in the STTR Program.
Federal agencies who participate in
the SBIR and STTR programs must
collect information from the public to:
(1) Meet their reporting requirements
under 15 U.S.C. 638 (b)(7), (g)(8), (i),
(j)(1)(E), (j)(3)(C), (l), (o)(10), and (v);
(2)Meet the requirement to maintain
both a publicly accessible database of
SBIR/STTR award information and a
government database of SBIR/STTR
award information for SBIR and STTR
program evaluation under 15 U.S.C.
638(g)(10), (k), (o)(9), and (o)(15); and
(3) Meet requirements for public
outreach under 15 U.S.C. 638 (j)(2)(F),
(o)(14), and (s).
DHS is not asking for anything
outside of what is already required in
the FAR. Should anything outside the
FAR arise, DHS will submit a request for
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval. The prior information
collect request for OMB No. 1600–005
was approved through October 31, 2011
by OMB in a Notice of OMB Action.
The information being collected is
used by the Government’s contracting
officers and other acquisition personnel,
including technical and legal staffs to
determine adequacy of technical and
management approach, experience,
responsibility, responsiveness, expertise
of the firms submitting offers,
identification of members of the public
(i.e., small businesses) who qualify for,
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75891
and are interested in participating in,
the DHS SBIR Program, facilitate SBIR
outreach to the public, and provide the
DHS SBIR Program Office necessary and
sufficient information to determine that
proposals submitted by the public to the
DHS SBIR Program meet criteria for
consideration under the program.
Failure to collect this information
would adversely affect the quality of
products and services DHS receives
from contractors. Potentially, contracts
would be awarded to firms without
sufficient experience and expertise,
thereby placing the Department’s
operations in jeopardy. Defective and
inadequate contractor deliverables
would adversely affect DHS’s
fulfillment of the mission requirements
in all areas. Additionally, the
Department would be unsuccessful in
identifying small businesses with
research and development (R&D)
capabilities, which would adversely
affect the mission requirements in this
area.
Many sources of the requested
information use automated word
processing systems, databases, emails,
and, in some cases, web portals to
facilitate preparation of material to be
submitted and to post and collect
information. It is common place within
many of DHS’s Components for
submissions to be electronic as a result
of implementation of e-Government
initiatives.
DHS S&T uses information technology
(i.e., electronic web portals) in the
collection of information to reduce the
data gathering and records management
burden. DHS S&T uses a secure Web site
which the public can propose SBIR
research topics and submit proposals in
response to SBIR solicitations. In
addition, DHS uses a web portal to
review RFIs and register to submit a
white paper or proposal in response to
a specific BAA. The data collection
forms standardize the collection of
information that is necessary and
sufficient for the DHS SBIR Program
Office to meet its requirements under 15
U.S.C. 638.
According to Federal Procurement
Data System (FPDS) and Federal
Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps),
the number of competitive solicitations
and award actions has increased each
over the past three years, thereby
increasing the universe of possible
respondents to DHS and its
Components’ solicitations. However, an
increase in the information collection
burden associated with the gathering of
additional information to support the
evaluation of solicitation responses has
been offset, by the use of electronic web
portals, such as CCR, FAPIIS, those used
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
75892
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 233 / Monday, December 5, 2011 / Notices
to submit SBIR research topics and
submit response to DHS SBIR
solicitations. Additionally, electronic
web portals are used to collect
unclassified white papers and proposals
to reduce the data gathering and records
management burden for BAAs.
In addition to issuance of solicitations
over the Internet or electronic systems;
increased use of oral presentations in
lieu of written proposals, permitted
under FAR 15.102; and increased use of
combined contract action notices/
requests for proposals, as encouraged by
FAR 12.603, are contributing to the
relative stability of DHS’s information
collection burden to the public. There is
no change in the information being
collected.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis
Agency: Office of the Chief
Procurement Officer, DHS.
Title: Solicitation of Proposal
Information for Award of Public
Contracts.
OMB Number: 1600–0005.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Private Sector.
Number of Respondents: 17,180.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 13
hours.
Total Burden Hours: 721,560.
Dated: November 28, 2011.
Margaret H. Graves,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–31062 Filed 12–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Dec 02, 2011
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Form I–690; Revision of an
Existing Information Collection;
Comment Request
30-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Form I–690,
Application for Waiver of Grounds of
Excludability; OMB Control Number
1615–0032.
ACTION:
The Department of Homeland
Security, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. An information collection notice
was previously published in the Federal
Register on August 19, 2011, at 76 FR
51996, allowing for a 60-day public
comment period. USCIS did not receive
any comments in connection with that
notice.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
an additional 30 days for public
comments. Comments are encouraged
and will be accepted until January 4,
2012. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the item(s) contained in this
notice, especially regarding the
estimated public burden and associated
response time, should be directed to the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), and to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), USCIS Desk Officer.
Comments may be submitted to: USCIS,
Chief, Regulatory Products Division, 20
Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC
20529–2020. Comments may also be
submitted to DHS via facsimile to (202)
272–0997 or via email at
uscisfrcomment@dhs.gov, and to the
OMB USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile
at (202) 395–5806 or via email at
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
When submitting comments by email,
please make sure to add OMB Control
No. 1615–0032 in the subject box.
Written comments and suggestions from
the public and affected agencies should
address one or more of the following
four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Application for Waiver of Grounds of
Excludability.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security
sponsoring the collection: Form I–690.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS).
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
Households. USCIS will use this form to
determine whether applicants are
eligible for admission to the United
States under sections 210 and 245A of
the Immigration and Nationality Act.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 74 responses at .25 hours (15
minutes) per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 19 annual burden hours.
If you need a copy of the information
collection instrument, please visit the
Web site at: https://www.regulations.
gov/.
We may also be contacted at: USCIS,
Regulatory Products Division, 20
Massachusetts Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20529–2020,
Telephone number (202) 272–8377.
Dated: November 29, 2011.
Sunday Aigbe,
Chief, Regulatory Products Division, Office
of the Executive Secretariat, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–31114 Filed 12–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75890-75892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31062]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Agency Information Collection Activities: Solicitation of
Proposal Information for Award of Public Contracts
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, DHS.
ACTION: 30-Day Notice and request for comments; Extension without
change of a currently approved collection, 1600-0005.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Chief
Procurement Officer, will submit the following information collection
request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(P.L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). DHS previously published this
information collection request (ICR) in the Federal Register on August
31, 2011 at 76 FR 54243, for a 60-day public comment period. No
comments were received by DHS. The purpose of this notice is to allow
additional 30-days for public comments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until January 4,
2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to OMB Desk Officer, Department of Homeland Security and sent
via electronic mail to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202)
395-5806.
The Office of Management and Budget is particularly interested in
comments which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If additional information is required
contact: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of Chief
Procurement Officer, Acquisition Policy and Legislation Office, DHS
Attn.: Camara Francis, Department of Homeland Security, Office of the
Chief
[[Page 75891]]
Procurement Officer, Room 3114, Washington, DC 20528,
Camara.Francis@hq.dhs.gov, (202) 447-5904.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
and the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer (OCPO) collect
information when inviting firms to submit bids, proposals, and offers
for public contracts for supplies and services. The information
collection is necessary for compliance with the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR); 48 CFR Chapter 1, the Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act (Division C of Title 41), under the Small
Business Innovative Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology
Transfer (STTR) programs 15 U.S.C. 628.
For solicitations to contract made through a variety of means,
whether conducted orally or in writing, contracting officers normally
request information from prospective offerors such as pricing
information, delivery schedule compliance, and whether the offeror has
the resources (both human and financial) to accomplish requirements.
Examples of the kinds of information collected can be found in the FAR
at FAR 13.106-1, 13.106-3, 13.302-1, -3, -5, subpart 13.5, subpart
14.2, subpart 15.2, subpart 6.1, and subpart 35.
Examples where collections of information occur in soliciting for
supplies/services include the issuance of draft Requests for Proposal
(RFP), Requests for Information (RFI), and Broad Agency Announcements
(BAA). The Government generally issues an RFP using the uniform
contract format (FAR 15.204-1) with the intent of awarding a contract
to one or more prospective offerors. The RFP can require those
interested in making an offer to provide information in the following
areas: schedule (FAR 15.204-2); contract clauses (FAR 15.204-3); list
of documents, exhibits and other attachments (FAR 15.204-4) or
representations and instructions (15.204-5).
FAR 15.201(e) authorizes agencies to issue RFIs when an agency
``does not presently intend to award a contract, but wants to obtain
price, delivery, other market information, or capabilities for planning
purposes''. RFIs solicit responses from the public. Similarly, FAR
35.106 authorizes Federal agencies to use BAAs to ``fulfill their
requirements for scientific study and experimentation directed toward
advancing the state-of-the-art or increasing knowledge or understanding
rather than focusing on a specific system or hardware solution.''
The DHS Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate issues BAAs
soliciting white papers and proposals from the public. DHS S&T
evaluates white papers and proposals received from the public in
response to a DHS S&T BAA using the evaluation criteria specified in
the BAA through a peer or scientific review process in accordance with
FAR 35.016(d). White paper evaluation determines those research ideas
that merit submission of a full proposal and proposal evaluation
determines those proposals that merit selection for contract award.
Unclassified white papers and proposals are typically collected via the
DHS S&T BAA secure Web site, while classified white papers and
proposals must be submitted via proper classified courier or proper
classified mailing procedures as described in the National Industrial
Security Program Operating Manual (NSPOM).
Federal agencies with an annual extramural research and development
(R&D) budget exceeding $100 million are required to participate in the
SBIR Program. Similarly, Federal agencies with an extramural R&D budget
exceeding $1 billion are required to participate in the STTR Program.
Federal agencies who participate in the SBIR and STTR programs must
collect information from the public to: (1) Meet their reporting
requirements under 15 U.S.C. 638 (b)(7), (g)(8), (i), (j)(1)(E),
(j)(3)(C), (l), (o)(10), and (v); (2)Meet the requirement to maintain
both a publicly accessible database of SBIR/STTR award information and
a government database of SBIR/STTR award information for SBIR and STTR
program evaluation under 15 U.S.C. 638(g)(10), (k), (o)(9), and
(o)(15); and (3) Meet requirements for public outreach under 15 U.S.C.
638 (j)(2)(F), (o)(14), and (s).
DHS is not asking for anything outside of what is already required
in the FAR. Should anything outside the FAR arise, DHS will submit a
request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. The prior
information collect request for OMB No. 1600-005 was approved through
October 31, 2011 by OMB in a Notice of OMB Action.
The information being collected is used by the Government's
contracting officers and other acquisition personnel, including
technical and legal staffs to determine adequacy of technical and
management approach, experience, responsibility, responsiveness,
expertise of the firms submitting offers, identification of members of
the public (i.e., small businesses) who qualify for, and are interested
in participating in, the DHS SBIR Program, facilitate SBIR outreach to
the public, and provide the DHS SBIR Program Office necessary and
sufficient information to determine that proposals submitted by the
public to the DHS SBIR Program meet criteria for consideration under
the program.
Failure to collect this information would adversely affect the
quality of products and services DHS receives from contractors.
Potentially, contracts would be awarded to firms without sufficient
experience and expertise, thereby placing the Department's operations
in jeopardy. Defective and inadequate contractor deliverables would
adversely affect DHS's fulfillment of the mission requirements in all
areas. Additionally, the Department would be unsuccessful in
identifying small businesses with research and development (R&D)
capabilities, which would adversely affect the mission requirements in
this area.
Many sources of the requested information use automated word
processing systems, databases, emails, and, in some cases, web portals
to facilitate preparation of material to be submitted and to post and
collect information. It is common place within many of DHS's Components
for submissions to be electronic as a result of implementation of e-
Government initiatives.
DHS S&T uses information technology (i.e., electronic web portals)
in the collection of information to reduce the data gathering and
records management burden. DHS S&T uses a secure Web site which the
public can propose SBIR research topics and submit proposals in
response to SBIR solicitations. In addition, DHS uses a web portal to
review RFIs and register to submit a white paper or proposal in
response to a specific BAA. The data collection forms standardize the
collection of information that is necessary and sufficient for the DHS
SBIR Program Office to meet its requirements under 15 U.S.C. 638.
According to Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) and Federal
Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps), the number of competitive
solicitations and award actions has increased each over the past three
years, thereby increasing the universe of possible respondents to DHS
and its Components' solicitations. However, an increase in the
information collection burden associated with the gathering of
additional information to support the evaluation of solicitation
responses has been offset, by the use of electronic web portals, such
as CCR, FAPIIS, those used
[[Page 75892]]
to submit SBIR research topics and submit response to DHS SBIR
solicitations. Additionally, electronic web portals are used to collect
unclassified white papers and proposals to reduce the data gathering
and records management burden for BAAs.
In addition to issuance of solicitations over the Internet or
electronic systems; increased use of oral presentations in lieu of
written proposals, permitted under FAR 15.102; and increased use of
combined contract action notices/requests for proposals, as encouraged
by FAR 12.603, are contributing to the relative stability of DHS's
information collection burden to the public. There is no change in the
information being collected.
The Office of Management and Budget is particularly interested in
comments which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
Analysis
Agency: Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, DHS.
Title: Solicitation of Proposal Information for Award of Public
Contracts.
OMB Number: 1600-0005.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Private Sector.
Number of Respondents: 17,180.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 13 hours.
Total Burden Hours: 721,560.
Dated: November 28, 2011.
Margaret H. Graves,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-31062 Filed 12-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9B-P