Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Mount Hope Project, Eureka County, NV, 75554-75555 [2011-30926]
Download as PDF
75554
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2011 / Notices
The pilot program was designed to
allow customs brokers to voluntarily
provide CBP with internal control
procedures designed to ensure their
compliance with broker requirements
such as annual summary reports from
periodic compliance evaluations and
risk assessments. CBP provided the
participants with recognition and
support, in the form of consultations
and general assistance.
The BSA team, which was comprised
of CBP regulatory auditors and national
account managers, gathered and
analyzed the data provided by the
participants to determine whether: (1)
The resources expended by brokers
were commensurate with the potential
gains to CBP and the broker; (2) there
were mutual benefits for CBP and the
broker that would make the program
attractive; and (3) the intent of the pilot
was realized through the pilot design
utilized. In making its assessment, the
BSA team examined the brokers’
processing of its clients’ submissions in
the following areas: periodic monthly
statement; bonded warehouse; importer
security filings; remote location filing;
and drawback.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pilot Results
CBP’s assessment of the pilot results
showed that the participants
successfully demonstrated their
supervision and control over customs
transactions and documented their
internal controls over their customs
operations. However, the procedures for
the internal controls, such as
supervision and control over customs
transactions and customs operations,
were not always written, and in some
cases, the procedures were modified or
improved, but not yet implemented. The
pilot also disclosed that the broker’s
assessment of risk factors differed from
the risk factors CBP identified as
potentially significant risks.
All of the participants agreed that the
BSA pilot helped them identify some
areas of risk that they had not
previously considered. Most of the
participants concluded that the
development of the internal control
procedures revealed ways to better
manage and mitigate risk factors.
The reliable quantitative measure
related to import transactions is the
compliance measurement rate, which
primarily measures compliance in areas
such as, classification, valuation, free
trade agreement, anti-dumping and
countervailing duty. It was discovered
in the BSA Pilot that the compliance
measurement rate did not necessarily
correlate with demonstrated compliance
on the part of the broker.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Dec 01, 2011
Jkt 226001
The BSA evaluation team’s
assessment of the broker’s internal
control for achieving compliance with
the CBP regulations (19 CFR part 111)
concluded that the participants
demonstrated a strong commitment to
ensuring compliance, professional
ethics and professional development of
their employees to meet its overall
objective in regards to broker oversight
and management controls. Moreover,
the participants generally provided
exemplary documentation to support
their processes, which validated the
assertions made as to the significant
resources allocated in preparation for
the team’s assessment. The NCBFAA
observed that the BSA pilot
demonstrated that business profiles and
process management within the
brokerage community is highly diverse.
As such, it would be difficult to provide
for a standard template that CBP could
use to establish uniform methodology
for compliance verification. NCBFAA
recommended that CBP not pursue the
BSA pilot as it is currently designed.
Since CBP has decided to end the
BSA pilot without a plan to proceed
with another Importer Self-Assessment
type model, CBP and NCBFAA will
pursue other avenues to collaborate
pertaining to trade modernization
efforts.
The complete March 1, 2011 ‘‘Broker
Self-Assessment Outreach Pilot’’ Report
is available on the following Web site:
https://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/
trade/trade_programs/bsa/
bsa_report.ctt/bsa_report.pdf.
Dated: November 29, 2011.
Allen Gina,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC
20410; telephone (202) 708–1234; TTY
number for the hearing- and speechimpaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at (800) 927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
Dated November 24, 2011.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2011–30835 Filed 12–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVB01000
L51100000.GN0000.LVEMF09CF010; NVN–
082096; NVN–084632; 12–08807; MO#:
4500027396; TAS: 14X5017]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Mount Hope Project, Eureka
County, NV
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2011–31009 Filed 12–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has prepared
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Mount Hope Project and by
this notice is announcing the opening of
the comment period.
DATES: To ensure comments will be
considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Mount Hope
Project Draft EIS within 90 days
following the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its Notice
of Availability in the Federal Register.
The BLM will announce future meetings
or hearings and any other public
involvement activities at least 15 days
in advance through public notices,
media releases, Web site postings, and/
or mailings.
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5477–N–48]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
to Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita Perry, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2011 / Notices
You may submit comments
related to the Mount Hope Project by
any of the following methods:
• Web site: https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/
en/fo/battle_mountain_field.html.
• Email: mhmm_project@blm.gov.
• Fax: (775) 635–4034, Attention:
Angelica Rose, Mt. Hope Project.
• Mail: BLM Battle Mountain District
Office, 50 Bastian Road, Battle
Mountain, NV 89820 Attn: Angelica
Rose, Mt. Hope Project.
Copies of the Mount Hope Project Draft
EIS are available at the Battle Mountain
District Office at the above address, and
on the Battle Mountain District’s NEPA
Web site at: https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/
en/fo/battle_mountain_field/
blm_information/
national_environmental.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angelica Rose, Planning and
Environmental Coordinator, telephone:
(775) 635–4000; address: 50 Bastian
Road, Battle Mountain, NV 89820;
email: mhmm_project@blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
(800) 877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Eureka
Moly, LLC, (EML) has submitted a Plan
of Operations (NVN–082096) to the
BLM for the proposed Mount Hope
Molybdenum Mining Project (project).
The proposed project would be located
in central Nevada approximately 23
miles northwest of Eureka, Nevada. The
proposed project includes a power
transmission line, a water well field,
and associated mine-processing
facilities. The project would be located
on both public and private lands in
Eureka County, Nevada. The surface
disturbance associated with the
proposed activities totals 8,318 acres, of
which 8,056 acres are on public land
and 262 acres are on private land. This
proposed project would consist of the
following primary components: an open
pit with associated pit dewatering; two
waste rock disposal facilities; milling
facilities; a molybdenite concentrate
roaster and packaging plant; a
ferromolybdenum plant for production
of ferromolybdenum alloy using a
metallothermic process and a separate
packaging plant for drums and bags; two
tailings storage facilities; an ongoing
exploration program; low-grade ore
stockpile; water supply in the Kobeh
Valley Well Field Area; a 24-mile long,
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:03 Dec 01, 2011
Jkt 226001
230-kilovolt electric power supply line
from the existing Machacek substation,
with a substation and distribution
system. Ancillary facilities would
include: haul, secondary, and
exploration roads; a ready line;
warehouse and maintenance facilities;
storm water diversions; sediment
control basins; pipeline corridors;
reagent and diesel storage; storage and
laydown yards; ammonium nitrate silos;
explosives magazines; fresh and fire
water storage and a process water
storage pond; monitoring wells; an
administration building; a security and
first aid building; a helipad; a
laboratory; growth media and cover
stockpiles; borrow areas; mine power
loop; communications equipment;
hazardous waste management facilities;
a Class III waivered landfill; an area to
store and treat petroleum contaminated
soils; and turn lanes on State Route 278.
The estimated 80-year project would
have an 18-month construction phase
and mine life of 32 years, which is
concurrent with an ore processing
timeline of 44 years, followed by 30
years of reclamation and 5 years of postreclamation monitoring. Concurrent
reclamation would not commence until
after the first 15 years of the project. The
Mount Hope ore body contains
approximately 966 million tons of
molybdenite (molybdenum disulfide)
ore that would produce approximately
1.1 billion pounds of recoverable
molybdenum during the ore-processing
time frame. Approximately 1.7 billion
tons of waste rock would be produced
by the end of the 32-year mine life and
approximately 1 billion tons of tailings
would be produced by the end of the 44
years of ore processing. Optimal
development of the molybdenum
deposit, to meet the market conditions
and maximize molybdenum production,
would utilize an open-pit mining
method and would process the mined
ore using a flotation and roasting
process.
The Draft EIS describes and analyzes
the proposed project’s site-specific
impacts, including cumulative impacts,
on all affected resources. Four action
alternatives, including the Proposed
Action as described above, were
analyzed in addition to the No Action
Alternative. Eight alternatives were
considered but eliminated from further
analysis. Based on the analysis in the
Draft EIS, the BLM has determined that
the Preferred Alternative is the approval
of the Proposed Action, with
accompanying mitigation measures.
On March 2, 2007, a Notice of Intent
was published in the Federal Register
(E7–3643) inviting scoping comments
on the proposed project and a news
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
75555
release was published in three northern
Nevada newspapers. Two public
scoping meetings for the project were
held: March 27, 2007 in Eureka, Nevada,
attended by five members of the public
with no written comments submitted;
and March 28, 2007 in Battle Mountain,
Nevada, attended by 30 members of
public with one written comment
submitted. Five additional comment
letters were received during the scoping
period and three letters were received
after the end of the scoping period. All
comments received have been
incorporated in a Scoping Summary
Report and have been considered in
preparation of the Draft EIS.
Concerns raised during scoping
include the length of time for mining
operations and reclamation, and access
to private lands. Potential impacts were
identified to the Pony Express National
Historic Trail, wildlife, migratory birds,
special status species, threatened and
endangered species (including sagegrouse and Lahontan cutthroat trout),
wild horses, hydrology resources
(related to water quality and quantity),
water rights holders, wetlands, air
quality, livestock grazing (relating to
forage and water availability and
reductions in AUMs), socioeconomic
impacts on the community, visual
resources; Native American traditional
values, impacts to cultural resources,
waste management, and reclamation.
Financial concerns were raised relating
to accountability of operators, bonding
requirements, and the establishment of
a long-term trust fund. These concerns
were addressed in the Draft EIS to the
extent practicable.
Please note that public comments and
information submitted, including
names, street addresses, and email
addresses of persons who submit
comments will be available for public
review and disclosure at the above
address during regular business hours (8
a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10.
Christopher J. Cook,
Mount Lewis Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 2011–30926 Filed 12–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 232 (Friday, December 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75554-75555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30926]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVB01000 L51100000.GN0000.LVEMF09CF010; NVN-082096; NVN-084632; 12-
08807; MO: 4500027396; TAS: 14X5017]
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Mount Hope Project, Eureka County, NV
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Mount
Hope Project and by this notice is announcing the opening of the
comment period.
DATES: To ensure comments will be considered, the BLM must receive
written comments on the Mount Hope Project Draft EIS within 90 days
following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its
Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. The BLM will announce
future meetings or hearings and any other public involvement activities
at least 15 days in advance through public notices, media releases, Web
site postings, and/or mailings.
[[Page 75555]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments related to the Mount Hope Project by
any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/battle_mountain_field.html.
Email: mhmm_project@blm.gov.
Fax: (775) 635-4034, Attention: Angelica Rose, Mt. Hope
Project.
Mail: BLM Battle Mountain District Office, 50 Bastian
Road, Battle Mountain, NV 89820 Attn: Angelica Rose, Mt. Hope Project.
Copies of the Mount Hope Project Draft EIS are available at the Battle
Mountain District Office at the above address, and on the Battle
Mountain District's NEPA Web site at: https://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/battle_mountain_field/blm_information/national_environmental.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelica Rose, Planning and
Environmental Coordinator, telephone: (775) 635-4000; address: 50
Bastian Road, Battle Mountain, NV 89820; email: mhmm_project@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-(800) 877-8339 to
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Eureka Moly, LLC, (EML) has submitted a Plan
of Operations (NVN-082096) to the BLM for the proposed Mount Hope
Molybdenum Mining Project (project). The proposed project would be
located in central Nevada approximately 23 miles northwest of Eureka,
Nevada. The proposed project includes a power transmission line, a
water well field, and associated mine-processing facilities. The
project would be located on both public and private lands in Eureka
County, Nevada. The surface disturbance associated with the proposed
activities totals 8,318 acres, of which 8,056 acres are on public land
and 262 acres are on private land. This proposed project would consist
of the following primary components: an open pit with associated pit
dewatering; two waste rock disposal facilities; milling facilities; a
molybdenite concentrate roaster and packaging plant; a ferromolybdenum
plant for production of ferromolybdenum alloy using a metallothermic
process and a separate packaging plant for drums and bags; two tailings
storage facilities; an ongoing exploration program; low-grade ore
stockpile; water supply in the Kobeh Valley Well Field Area; a 24-mile
long, 230-kilovolt electric power supply line from the existing
Machacek substation, with a substation and distribution system.
Ancillary facilities would include: haul, secondary, and exploration
roads; a ready line; warehouse and maintenance facilities; storm water
diversions; sediment control basins; pipeline corridors; reagent and
diesel storage; storage and laydown yards; ammonium nitrate silos;
explosives magazines; fresh and fire water storage and a process water
storage pond; monitoring wells; an administration building; a security
and first aid building; a helipad; a laboratory; growth media and cover
stockpiles; borrow areas; mine power loop; communications equipment;
hazardous waste management facilities; a Class III waivered landfill;
an area to store and treat petroleum contaminated soils; and turn lanes
on State Route 278.
The estimated 80-year project would have an 18-month construction
phase and mine life of 32 years, which is concurrent with an ore
processing timeline of 44 years, followed by 30 years of reclamation
and 5 years of post-reclamation monitoring. Concurrent reclamation
would not commence until after the first 15 years of the project. The
Mount Hope ore body contains approximately 966 million tons of
molybdenite (molybdenum disulfide) ore that would produce approximately
1.1 billion pounds of recoverable molybdenum during the ore-processing
time frame. Approximately 1.7 billion tons of waste rock would be
produced by the end of the 32-year mine life and approximately 1
billion tons of tailings would be produced by the end of the 44 years
of ore processing. Optimal development of the molybdenum deposit, to
meet the market conditions and maximize molybdenum production, would
utilize an open-pit mining method and would process the mined ore using
a flotation and roasting process.
The Draft EIS describes and analyzes the proposed project's site-
specific impacts, including cumulative impacts, on all affected
resources. Four action alternatives, including the Proposed Action as
described above, were analyzed in addition to the No Action
Alternative. Eight alternatives were considered but eliminated from
further analysis. Based on the analysis in the Draft EIS, the BLM has
determined that the Preferred Alternative is the approval of the
Proposed Action, with accompanying mitigation measures.
On March 2, 2007, a Notice of Intent was published in the Federal
Register (E7-3643) inviting scoping comments on the proposed project
and a news release was published in three northern Nevada newspapers.
Two public scoping meetings for the project were held: March 27, 2007
in Eureka, Nevada, attended by five members of the public with no
written comments submitted; and March 28, 2007 in Battle Mountain,
Nevada, attended by 30 members of public with one written comment
submitted. Five additional comment letters were received during the
scoping period and three letters were received after the end of the
scoping period. All comments received have been incorporated in a
Scoping Summary Report and have been considered in preparation of the
Draft EIS.
Concerns raised during scoping include the length of time for
mining operations and reclamation, and access to private lands.
Potential impacts were identified to the Pony Express National Historic
Trail, wildlife, migratory birds, special status species, threatened
and endangered species (including sage-grouse and Lahontan cutthroat
trout), wild horses, hydrology resources (related to water quality and
quantity), water rights holders, wetlands, air quality, livestock
grazing (relating to forage and water availability and reductions in
AUMs), socioeconomic impacts on the community, visual resources; Native
American traditional values, impacts to cultural resources, waste
management, and reclamation. Financial concerns were raised relating to
accountability of operators, bonding requirements, and the
establishment of a long-term trust fund. These concerns were addressed
in the Draft EIS to the extent practicable.
Please note that public comments and information submitted,
including names, street addresses, and email addresses of persons who
submit comments will be available for public review and disclosure at
the above address during regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10.
Christopher J. Cook,
Mount Lewis Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 2011-30926 Filed 12-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P