Office of Procurement and Property Management; Agriculture Acquisition Regulation, Labor Law Violations, 74755-74756 [2011-30875]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules corrective action. By entering into any relationship under this section, the provider is not relieved of any responsibility to the Postal Service, and such must be stated in any memorialization of the relationship. Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice. [FR Doc. 2011–30876 Filed 11–30–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 70 [Regional Docket Nos. V–2010–1, FRL– 9498–6] Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit for Carmeuse Stone and Lime Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Denial of petition. AGENCY: This document announces that the EPA Administrator has denied a petition from the Sierra Club asking EPA to object to a Title V operating permit for Carmeuse Stone and Lime (Carmeuse) issued by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the Act provide that a petitioner may ask for judicial review of those portions of the petition which EPA denies in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit. Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 307 of the Act. ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final Order, the petition, and other supporting information at the EPA Region 5 Office, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an appointment at least 24 hours before visiting day. Additionally, the final Order for the Carmeuse petition is available electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/ region7/air/title5/petitiondb/ petitiondb.htm. emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division, EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, telephone (312) 353– 4761. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:23 Nov 30, 2011 Jkt 226001 The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to review, and object, as appropriate, to Title V operating permits proposed by state permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the expiration of the EPA review period to object to a Title V operating permit if EPA has not done so. A petition must be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided by the state, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise issues during the comment period, or the grounds for the issues arose after this period. On December 15, 2009, EPA received a petition from the Sierra Club requesting that EPA object to the Title V operating permit for Carmeuse. The Petitioner alleged that the permit is not in compliance with the requirements of the Act. Specifically, the Petitioner alleged that: (1) A Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit issued by EPA in 1979 did not allow Carmeuse to burn petroleum coke as a fuel and the permit never was modified to allow for it; (2) WDNR was not authorized to revise EPA’s 1979 permit; and (3) a construction permit issued by WDNR in 1995 was flawed because WDNR did not use the correct permit process, and did not do the netting analysis or the modeling and increment analyses correctly. On November 4, 2011, the Administrator issued an Order denying the Sierra Club’s petition. The Order explains the reasons behind EPA’s conclusion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: November 16, 2011. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2011–30843 Filed 11–30–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 48 CFR Part 422 RIN 0599–AA19 Office of Procurement and Property Management; Agriculture Acquisition Regulation, Labor Law Violations Office of Procurement and Property Management, Department of Agriculture. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Office of Procurement and Property Management (OPPM) of the Department of Agriculture (USDA) SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 74755 proposes to amend the Agriculture Acquisition Regulation (the ‘‘AGAR’’) to add a new clause at subpart 422.70 entitled ‘‘Labor Law Violations.’’ In the final rule section of the Federal Register, the Agency is publishing this action as a direct final rule without prior proposal because OPPM views this as a non-controversial action and expects no adverse comments. If no adverse comments are received in response to the direct final rule, no further action will be taken on this proposed rule, and the action will become effective at the time specified in the direct final rule. If the Agency receives adverse comments, a timely document will be published withdrawing the direct final rule, and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action. DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the Department of Agriculture, OPPM on or before January 30, 2012 to be considered in the formulation of a final rule. ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified in the subject line as ‘‘48 CFR 422 Proposed Rule’’ by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Email: Procurement@usda.gov. • Mail: Office of Procurement and Property Management, Procurement Policy Division, MAIL STOP 9306, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–9303. • Hand Delivery/Courier: Room 262, Reporters’ Building, 300 7th Street SW., Washington, DC. Instructions: All submissions must be identified as ‘‘48 CFR 422 Proposed Rule’’ for this proposed rulemaking. Please include your name, company name (if applicable), email address and/ or phone number where you can be contacted if additional clarification is required regarding your comment(s). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Calacone, Office of Procurement and Property Management, at (202) 205– 4036 or by mail at OPPM, MAIL STOP 9304, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–9303. Please cite ‘‘48 CFR 422 (Proposed Rule)’’ in all correspondence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) highly respects and follows the policies and laws regarding worker labor protections particularly as they E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM 01DEP1 74756 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules pertain to the acquisition process. To support these objectives, this proposed rule adds a subpart and clause entitled Labor Law Violations to the Agriculture Acquisition Regulation (AGAR). The AGAR may be accessed at: https:// www.dm.usda.gov/procurement/policy/ agar.html. This clause is to be included in all USDA contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, including all contract options. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act USDA certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. There is no additional submission required as a result of this action. The rule will not have a significant impact on the small business community or on a substantial number of small businesses. The Department invites comment on its estimates for the potential impact of this rulemaking on small businesses. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed rule does not impose any recordkeeping or information collection requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and Budget. emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS D. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ and Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasized the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as not significant according to Executive Order 12866 and therefore this rule has not been reviewed by OMB. E. Executive Order 12988 This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not retroactive and does not preempt State or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. Before any judicial action may be brought regarding the provisions of this rule, appeal provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:23 Nov 30, 2011 Jkt 226001 F. Executive Order 13132 PART 422—[AMENDED] This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Provisions of this proposed rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States or their political subdivisions or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various government levels. 1. The authority citation for part 422 continues to read as follows: G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), and therefore a written statement is not required. H. Executive Order 12372 This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental review of Federal programs, and does not establish federal financial assistance or direct Federal development with State and local governments, and is therefore outside the scope of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. I. Executive Order 13175 This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments, and does not have tribal implications or impose unfunded mandates with Indian tribes. J. E-Government Act Compliance USDA is committed to compliance with the E-Government Act, which requires Government agencies, in general, to provide the public the option of submitting information or transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible. This proposed rule requires one letter from requestors which can be sent electronically to USDA. USDA will continue to seek other avenues to increase electronically submitted information. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 422 Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 40 U.S.C. 486(c). 2. Subpart 422.70 is added to read as follows: Subpart 422.70—Labor Law Violations 422.7001 Contract clause. Insert the clause at 452.222–7001, Labor Law Violations, in solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Contracting officers shall report violations to the Office of Procurement and Property Management, Procurement Policy Division, within two working days following notification by the contractor. 452.222–7001 As prescribed in 422.7001, insert the following clause: Labor Law Violations (August 2011) In accepting this contract award, the contractor certifies that it is in compliance with all applicable labor laws and that, to the best of its knowledge, its subcontractors of any tier, and suppliers, are also in compliance with all applicable labor laws. The Department of Agriculture will vigorously pursue corrective action against the contractor and/or any tier subcontractor (or supplier) in the event of a violation of labor law made in the provision of supplies and/or services under this or any other government contract. The contractor is responsible for promptly reporting to the contracting officer when formal allegations or formal findings of non-compliance of labor laws are determined. The Department of Agriculture considers certification under this clause to be a certification for purposes of the False Claims Act. The Department will cooperate as appropriate regarding labor laws applicable to the contract which are enforced by other agencies. (End of Clause) Dated: November 17, 2011. Lisa M. Wilusz, Director, Office of Procurement and Property Management. [FR Doc. 2011–30875 Filed 11–30–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–98–P Classified information, Computer technology, Government procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Agriculture proposes to amend 48 CFR part 422, as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 Labor Law Violations. E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM 01DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 231 (Thursday, December 1, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74755-74756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

48 CFR Part 422

RIN 0599-AA19


Office of Procurement and Property Management; Agriculture 
Acquisition Regulation, Labor Law Violations

AGENCY: Office of Procurement and Property Management, Department of 
Agriculture.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Procurement and Property Management (OPPM) of 
the Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposes to amend the Agriculture 
Acquisition Regulation (the ``AGAR'') to add a new clause at subpart 
422.70 entitled ``Labor Law Violations.'' In the final rule section of 
the Federal Register, the Agency is publishing this action as a direct 
final rule without prior proposal because OPPM views this as a non-
controversial action and expects no adverse comments. If no adverse 
comments are received in response to the direct final rule, no further 
action will be taken on this proposed rule, and the action will become 
effective at the time specified in the direct final rule. If the Agency 
receives adverse comments, a timely document will be published 
withdrawing the direct final rule, and all public comments received 
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action.

DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the 
Department of Agriculture, OPPM on or before January 30, 2012 to be 
considered in the formulation of a final rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified in the subject line as ``48 CFR 
422 Proposed Rule'' by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: Procurement@usda.gov.
     Mail: Office of Procurement and Property Management, 
Procurement Policy Division, MAIL STOP 9306, U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-9303.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Room 262, Reporters' Building, 300 
7th Street SW., Washington, DC.
    Instructions: All submissions must be identified as ``48 CFR 422 
Proposed Rule'' for this proposed rulemaking. Please include your name, 
company name (if applicable), email address and/or phone number where 
you can be contacted if additional clarification is required regarding 
your comment(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Calacone, Office of Procurement 
and Property Management, at (202) 205-4036 or by mail at OPPM, MAIL 
STOP 9304, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue 
SW., Washington, DC 20250-9303. Please cite ``48 CFR 422 (Proposed 
Rule)'' in all correspondence.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) highly respects and 
follows the policies and laws regarding worker labor protections 
particularly as they

[[Page 74756]]

pertain to the acquisition process. To support these objectives, this 
proposed rule adds a subpart and clause entitled Labor Law Violations 
to the Agriculture Acquisition Regulation (AGAR). The AGAR may be 
accessed at: https://www.dm.usda.gov/procurement/policy/agar.html. This 
clause is to be included in all USDA contracts that exceed the 
simplified acquisition threshold, including all contract options.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    USDA certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined in the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. There is no 
additional submission required as a result of this action. The rule 
will not have a significant impact on the small business community or 
on a substantial number of small businesses. The Department invites 
comment on its estimates for the potential impact of this rulemaking on 
small businesses.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed 
rule does not impose any recordkeeping or information collection 
requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and 
Budget.

D. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and 
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' 
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available 
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select 
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential 
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive 
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasized the importance 
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of 
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as not significant 
according to Executive Order 12866 and therefore this rule has not been 
reviewed by OMB.

E. Executive Order 12988

    This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. This rule is not retroactive and does not preempt State 
or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present an 
irreconcilable conflict with this rule. Before any judicial action may 
be brought regarding the provisions of this rule, appeal provisions of 
7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted.

F. Executive Order 13132

    This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive 
Order 13132, Federalism, and does not have sufficient federalism 
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. 
Provisions of this proposed rule will not have a substantial direct 
effect on States or their political subdivisions or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various government levels.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates under the 
regulatory provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
of 1995 (UMRA), and therefore a written statement is not required.

H. Executive Order 12372

    This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive 
Order 12372, Intergovernmental review of Federal programs, and does not 
establish federal financial assistance or direct Federal development 
with State and local governments, and is therefore outside the scope of 
Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation 
with State and local officials.

I. Executive Order 13175

    This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal 
Governments, and does not have tribal implications or impose unfunded 
mandates with Indian tribes.

J. E-Government Act Compliance

    USDA is committed to compliance with the E-Government Act, which 
requires Government agencies, in general, to provide the public the 
option of submitting information or transacting business electronically 
to the maximum extent possible. This proposed rule requires one letter 
from requestors which can be sent electronically to USDA. USDA will 
continue to seek other avenues to increase electronically submitted 
information.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 422

    Classified information, Computer technology, Government 
procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of 
Agriculture proposes to amend 48 CFR part 422, as follows:

PART 422--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 422 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301 and 40 U.S.C. 486(c).

    2. Subpart 422.70 is added to read as follows:

Subpart 422.70--Labor Law Violations


422.7001  Contract clause.

    Insert the clause at 452.222-7001, Labor Law Violations, in 
solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition 
threshold. Contracting officers shall report violations to the Office 
of Procurement and Property Management, Procurement Policy Division, 
within two working days following notification by the contractor.


452.222-7001  Labor Law Violations.

    As prescribed in 422.7001, insert the following clause:

Labor Law Violations (August 2011)

    In accepting this contract award, the contractor certifies that 
it is in compliance with all applicable labor laws and that, to the 
best of its knowledge, its subcontractors of any tier, and 
suppliers, are also in compliance with all applicable labor laws. 
The Department of Agriculture will vigorously pursue corrective 
action against the contractor and/or any tier subcontractor (or 
supplier) in the event of a violation of labor law made in the 
provision of supplies and/or services under this or any other 
government contract. The contractor is responsible for promptly 
reporting to the contracting officer when formal allegations or 
formal findings of non-compliance of labor laws are determined. The 
Department of Agriculture considers certification under this clause 
to be a certification for purposes of the False Claims Act. The 
Department will cooperate as appropriate regarding labor laws 
applicable to the contract which are enforced by other agencies.

(End of Clause)

    Dated: November 17, 2011.
Lisa M. Wilusz,
Director, Office of Procurement and Property Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-30875 Filed 11-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-98-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.