Office of Procurement and Property Management; Agriculture Acquisition Regulation, Labor Law Violations, 74755-74756 [2011-30875]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules
corrective action. By entering into any
relationship under this section, the
provider is not relieved of any
responsibility to the Postal Service, and
such must be stated in any
memorialization of the relationship.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2011–30876 Filed 11–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[Regional Docket Nos. V–2010–1, FRL–
9498–6]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Carmeuse
Stone and Lime
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Denial of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
that the EPA Administrator has denied
a petition from the Sierra Club asking
EPA to object to a Title V operating
permit for Carmeuse Stone and Lime
(Carmeuse) issued by the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR).
Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the
Act provide that a petitioner may ask for
judicial review of those portions of the
petition which EPA denies in the
United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Any petition for
review shall be filed within 60 days
from the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section
307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of
the final Order, the petition, and other
supporting information at the EPA
Region 5 Office, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. If
you wish to examine these documents,
you should make an appointment at
least 24 hours before visiting day.
Additionally, the final Order for the
Carmeuse petition is available
electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/
region7/air/title5/petitiondb/
petitiondb.htm.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits
Section, Air Programs Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, EPA, Region 5, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, telephone (312) 353–
4761.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
The Act
affords EPA a 45-day period to review,
and object, as appropriate, to Title V
operating permits proposed by state
permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2)
of the Act authorizes any person to
petition the EPA Administrator within
60 days after the expiration of the EPA
review period to object to a Title V
operating permit if EPA has not done so.
A petition must be based only on
objections to the permit that were raised
with reasonable specificity during the
public comment period provided by the
state, unless the petitioner demonstrates
that it was impracticable to raise issues
during the comment period, or the
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
On December 15, 2009, EPA received
a petition from the Sierra Club
requesting that EPA object to the Title
V operating permit for Carmeuse. The
Petitioner alleged that the permit is not
in compliance with the requirements of
the Act. Specifically, the Petitioner
alleged that: (1) A Prevention of
Significant Deterioration permit issued
by EPA in 1979 did not allow Carmeuse
to burn petroleum coke as a fuel and the
permit never was modified to allow for
it; (2) WDNR was not authorized to
revise EPA’s 1979 permit; and (3) a
construction permit issued by WDNR in
1995 was flawed because WDNR did not
use the correct permit process, and did
not do the netting analysis or the
modeling and increment analyses
correctly.
On November 4, 2011, the
Administrator issued an Order denying
the Sierra Club’s petition. The Order
explains the reasons behind EPA’s
conclusion.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 16, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2011–30843 Filed 11–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
48 CFR Part 422
RIN 0599–AA19
Office of Procurement and Property
Management; Agriculture Acquisition
Regulation, Labor Law Violations
Office of Procurement and
Property Management, Department of
Agriculture.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of Procurement
and Property Management (OPPM) of
the Department of Agriculture (USDA)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74755
proposes to amend the Agriculture
Acquisition Regulation (the ‘‘AGAR’’) to
add a new clause at subpart 422.70
entitled ‘‘Labor Law Violations.’’ In the
final rule section of the Federal
Register, the Agency is publishing this
action as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because OPPM views this
as a non-controversial action and
expects no adverse comments. If no
adverse comments are received in
response to the direct final rule, no
further action will be taken on this
proposed rule, and the action will
become effective at the time specified in
the direct final rule. If the Agency
receives adverse comments, a timely
document will be published
withdrawing the direct final rule, and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this action.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Department of
Agriculture, OPPM on or before January
30, 2012 to be considered in the
formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified in the subject line as ‘‘48 CFR
422 Proposed Rule’’ by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: Procurement@usda.gov.
• Mail: Office of Procurement and
Property Management, Procurement
Policy Division, MAIL STOP 9306, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9303.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Room 262,
Reporters’ Building, 300 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC.
Instructions: All submissions must be
identified as ‘‘48 CFR 422 Proposed
Rule’’ for this proposed rulemaking.
Please include your name, company
name (if applicable), email address and/
or phone number where you can be
contacted if additional clarification is
required regarding your comment(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Calacone, Office of Procurement
and Property Management, at (202) 205–
4036 or by mail at OPPM, MAIL STOP
9304, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9303. Please cite
‘‘48 CFR 422 (Proposed Rule)’’ in all
correspondence.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) highly respects and follows the
policies and laws regarding worker
labor protections particularly as they
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
74756
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2011 / Proposed Rules
pertain to the acquisition process. To
support these objectives, this proposed
rule adds a subpart and clause entitled
Labor Law Violations to the Agriculture
Acquisition Regulation (AGAR). The
AGAR may be accessed at: https://
www.dm.usda.gov/procurement/policy/
agar.html. This clause is to be included
in all USDA contracts that exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold,
including all contract options.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
USDA certifies that this proposed rule
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. There is no
additional submission required as a
result of this action. The rule will not
have a significant impact on the small
business community or on a substantial
number of small businesses. The
Department invites comment on its
estimates for the potential impact of this
rulemaking on small businesses.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the proposed rule
does not impose any recordkeeping or
information collection requirements that
require approval by the Office of
Management and Budget.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review,’’ direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasized the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
designated this rule as not significant
according to Executive Order 12866 and
therefore this rule has not been
reviewed by OMB.
E. Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not retroactive and
does not preempt State or local laws,
regulations, or policies unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule. Before any judicial action may
be brought regarding the provisions of
this rule, appeal provisions of 7 CFR
parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Nov 30, 2011
Jkt 226001
F. Executive Order 13132
PART 422—[AMENDED]
This proposed rule has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
13132, Federalism, and does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment. Provisions of this proposed
rule will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or their political
subdivisions or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various government levels.
1. The authority citation for part 422
continues to read as follows:
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule contains no
Federal mandates under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA),
and therefore a written statement is not
required.
H. Executive Order 12372
This proposed rule has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12372, Intergovernmental review of
Federal programs, and does not
establish federal financial assistance or
direct Federal development with State
and local governments, and is therefore
outside the scope of Executive Order
12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials.
I. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments, and
does not have tribal implications or
impose unfunded mandates with Indian
tribes.
J. E-Government Act Compliance
USDA is committed to compliance
with the E-Government Act, which
requires Government agencies, in
general, to provide the public the option
of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible. This proposed rule
requires one letter from requestors
which can be sent electronically to
USDA. USDA will continue to seek
other avenues to increase electronically
submitted information.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 422
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 40 U.S.C.
486(c).
2. Subpart 422.70 is added to read as
follows:
Subpart 422.70—Labor Law Violations
422.7001
Contract clause.
Insert the clause at 452.222–7001,
Labor Law Violations, in solicitations
and contracts that exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold. Contracting
officers shall report violations to the
Office of Procurement and Property
Management, Procurement Policy
Division, within two working days
following notification by the contractor.
452.222–7001
As prescribed in 422.7001, insert the
following clause:
Labor Law Violations (August 2011)
In accepting this contract award, the
contractor certifies that it is in compliance
with all applicable labor laws and that, to the
best of its knowledge, its subcontractors of
any tier, and suppliers, are also in
compliance with all applicable labor laws.
The Department of Agriculture will
vigorously pursue corrective action against
the contractor and/or any tier subcontractor
(or supplier) in the event of a violation of
labor law made in the provision of supplies
and/or services under this or any other
government contract. The contractor is
responsible for promptly reporting to the
contracting officer when formal allegations or
formal findings of non-compliance of labor
laws are determined. The Department of
Agriculture considers certification under this
clause to be a certification for purposes of the
False Claims Act. The Department will
cooperate as appropriate regarding labor laws
applicable to the contract which are enforced
by other agencies.
(End of Clause)
Dated: November 17, 2011.
Lisa M. Wilusz,
Director, Office of Procurement and Property
Management.
[FR Doc. 2011–30875 Filed 11–30–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–98–P
Classified information, Computer
technology, Government procurement,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Agriculture
proposes to amend 48 CFR part 422, as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Labor Law Violations.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 231 (Thursday, December 1, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74755-74756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30875]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
48 CFR Part 422
RIN 0599-AA19
Office of Procurement and Property Management; Agriculture
Acquisition Regulation, Labor Law Violations
AGENCY: Office of Procurement and Property Management, Department of
Agriculture.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Procurement and Property Management (OPPM) of
the Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposes to amend the Agriculture
Acquisition Regulation (the ``AGAR'') to add a new clause at subpart
422.70 entitled ``Labor Law Violations.'' In the final rule section of
the Federal Register, the Agency is publishing this action as a direct
final rule without prior proposal because OPPM views this as a non-
controversial action and expects no adverse comments. If no adverse
comments are received in response to the direct final rule, no further
action will be taken on this proposed rule, and the action will become
effective at the time specified in the direct final rule. If the Agency
receives adverse comments, a timely document will be published
withdrawing the direct final rule, and all public comments received
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Department of Agriculture, OPPM on or before January 30, 2012 to be
considered in the formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified in the subject line as ``48 CFR
422 Proposed Rule'' by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Procurement@usda.gov.
Mail: Office of Procurement and Property Management,
Procurement Policy Division, MAIL STOP 9306, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-9303.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Room 262, Reporters' Building, 300
7th Street SW., Washington, DC.
Instructions: All submissions must be identified as ``48 CFR 422
Proposed Rule'' for this proposed rulemaking. Please include your name,
company name (if applicable), email address and/or phone number where
you can be contacted if additional clarification is required regarding
your comment(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Calacone, Office of Procurement
and Property Management, at (202) 205-4036 or by mail at OPPM, MAIL
STOP 9304, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20250-9303. Please cite ``48 CFR 422 (Proposed
Rule)'' in all correspondence.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) highly respects and
follows the policies and laws regarding worker labor protections
particularly as they
[[Page 74756]]
pertain to the acquisition process. To support these objectives, this
proposed rule adds a subpart and clause entitled Labor Law Violations
to the Agriculture Acquisition Regulation (AGAR). The AGAR may be
accessed at: https://www.dm.usda.gov/procurement/policy/agar.html. This
clause is to be included in all USDA contracts that exceed the
simplified acquisition threshold, including all contract options.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
USDA certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. There is no
additional submission required as a result of this action. The rule
will not have a significant impact on the small business community or
on a substantial number of small businesses. The Department invites
comment on its estimates for the potential impact of this rulemaking on
small businesses.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed
rule does not impose any recordkeeping or information collection
requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and
Budget.
D. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,''
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasized the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as not significant
according to Executive Order 12866 and therefore this rule has not been
reviewed by OMB.
E. Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not retroactive and does not preempt State
or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule. Before any judicial action may
be brought regarding the provisions of this rule, appeal provisions of
7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted.
F. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, Federalism, and does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Provisions of this proposed rule will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or their political subdivisions or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various government levels.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates under the
regulatory provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (UMRA), and therefore a written statement is not required.
H. Executive Order 12372
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12372, Intergovernmental review of Federal programs, and does not
establish federal financial assistance or direct Federal development
with State and local governments, and is therefore outside the scope of
Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials.
I. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments, and does not have tribal implications or impose unfunded
mandates with Indian tribes.
J. E-Government Act Compliance
USDA is committed to compliance with the E-Government Act, which
requires Government agencies, in general, to provide the public the
option of submitting information or transacting business electronically
to the maximum extent possible. This proposed rule requires one letter
from requestors which can be sent electronically to USDA. USDA will
continue to seek other avenues to increase electronically submitted
information.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 422
Classified information, Computer technology, Government
procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of
Agriculture proposes to amend 48 CFR part 422, as follows:
PART 422--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 422 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 40 U.S.C. 486(c).
2. Subpart 422.70 is added to read as follows:
Subpart 422.70--Labor Law Violations
422.7001 Contract clause.
Insert the clause at 452.222-7001, Labor Law Violations, in
solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold. Contracting officers shall report violations to the Office
of Procurement and Property Management, Procurement Policy Division,
within two working days following notification by the contractor.
452.222-7001 Labor Law Violations.
As prescribed in 422.7001, insert the following clause:
Labor Law Violations (August 2011)
In accepting this contract award, the contractor certifies that
it is in compliance with all applicable labor laws and that, to the
best of its knowledge, its subcontractors of any tier, and
suppliers, are also in compliance with all applicable labor laws.
The Department of Agriculture will vigorously pursue corrective
action against the contractor and/or any tier subcontractor (or
supplier) in the event of a violation of labor law made in the
provision of supplies and/or services under this or any other
government contract. The contractor is responsible for promptly
reporting to the contracting officer when formal allegations or
formal findings of non-compliance of labor laws are determined. The
Department of Agriculture considers certification under this clause
to be a certification for purposes of the False Claims Act. The
Department will cooperate as appropriate regarding labor laws
applicable to the contract which are enforced by other agencies.
(End of Clause)
Dated: November 17, 2011.
Lisa M. Wilusz,
Director, Office of Procurement and Property Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-30875 Filed 11-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-98-P