Remittance Transfers, 73993-73994 [2011-30365]
Download as PDF
73993
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 230
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133–AD94
Remittance Transfers
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NCUA is amending its rules
to conform to amendments made to the
Federal Credit Union Act (FCU Act) by
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act). The final rule adds remittance
transfers, as now defined under the
Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA), as
an example of money transfer
instruments federal credit unions
(FCUs) may provide to persons within
their fields of membership.
DATES: Effective on November 30, 2011
NCUA is adopting the interim final rule
published on July 27, 2011, 76 FR
44761, without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chrisanthy Loizos, Staff Attorney, Office
of General Counsel, at the above address
or telephone: (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
II. Summary of Public Comments
III. Final Rule
IV. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background 1
Why is NCUA adopting this rule?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Since 2006, FCUs have had the
authority to provide certain financial
services to all persons within their
1 President Obama signed the Plain Writing Act
of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–274) into law on October 13,
2010 ‘‘to improve the effectiveness and
accountability of federal agencies to the public by
promoting clear Government communication that
the public can understand and use.’’ This preamble
is written to meet plain writing objectives.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:06 Nov 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
fields of membership under the
Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act
of 2006 (Reg Relief Act), Public Law
109–351. Congress intended to allow
FCUs ‘‘to sell negotiable checks, money
orders, and other similar transfer
instruments, including international
and domestic electronic fund transfers,
to anyone eligible for membership,
regardless of their membership status.’’
S. Rpt. 109–256, p. 5; H. Rpt. 109–356
Part 1, p. 63. As a result, NCUA created
a rule, § 701.30, to address an FCU’s
authority to provide financial services to
persons within its field of membership.
71 FR 62875 (Oct. 27, 2006) (interim
final rule); 72 FR 7927 (Feb. 22, 2007)
(final rule).
Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act
added a new Section 919 to the EFTA,
entitled ‘‘Remittance Transfers.’’ Public
Law 111–203, § 1073, 124 Stat. 2066
(2010). The new Section 919 of the
EFTA creates protections for consumers
who, through remittance transfer
providers, send money to designated
recipients located in foreign countries.
15 U.S.C. 1693o–1. Paragraph (d) of
Section 1073 of Dodd-Frank amended
the FCU Act to specify that a remittance
transfer, as defined by new Section 919
of the EFTA, is an example of a money
transfer instrument that FCUs may sell
to persons within their fields of
membership. 12 U.S.C. 1757(12)(A).
Section 919(g)(2) of the EFTA, defines
a remittance transfer as an electronic
transfer of funds requested by a sender
to a designated recipient that is initiated
by a remittance transfer provider,
regardless of whether the sender has an
account with the remittance transfer
provider or whether the transfer meets
the statute’s definition of an electronic
funds transfer (EFT). 15 U.S.C. 1693o–
1(g)(2). The law excludes small value
transactions from the definition.
Remittance transfers, typically
consumer to consumer payments, may
be executed through a variety of means,
including international wire transfers,
international automated clearing house
transactions, other account-to-account
or account-to-cash products, and
reloadable prepaid cards. The law
requires remittance transfer providers to
give consumers certain disclosures,
including a receipt that contains
remittance transfer fees, the exchange
rate to be used by the remittance
transfer provider, the amount of
currency to be received by the recipient
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and the estimated date of delivery. In
addition, the law requires the sender to
receive a statement that addresses error
resolution rights.
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve proposed a remittance transfer
rule, which addresses disclosure
requirements and error resolution, and
provides a detailed analysis of the
services offered by remittance transfer
providers. 99 FR 29902 (May 23, 2011).
The Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau assumed responsibility for
issuing the final remittance transfer rule
after the close of the comment period on
July 22, 2011.
FCUs have had the authority to
transfer funds at the request of
consumers within their fields of
membership to recipients
internationally since the adoption of the
Reg Relief Act. The amendment to the
FCU Act’s powers provision by the
Dodd-Frank Act makes plain that FCUs
may offer all variations of remittance
transfers, as now defined by the EFTA,
for the benefit of consumers within their
fields of membership, subject to certain
consumer protections. The addition of
remittance transfers as an example of
permissible money transfer instruments,
in addition to the newly-enacted
consumer disclosures and rights,
demonstrate the clear intention of
Congress to promote access to
remittance transfers and ensure
protections for consumers.
Finally, Section 1073(d) of the DoddFrank Act adjusted Section 107(12) of
the FCU Act by removing the reference
to the receipt of international and
domestic EFTs from subparagraph (B).
As explained below, this simply
eliminates a redundancy and does not
affect the ability of FCUs to offer EFT
services.
What changes did the interim final rule
make?
In the interim final rule, the NCUA
Board (Board) amended § 701.30 to
directly track the statutory provisions of
Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act. 76
FR 44761 (Jul. 27, 2011). The Board
added remittance transfers as defined by
Section 919 of the EFTA as an example
of permissible money transfer
instruments in paragraph (a). The Board
also amended paragraph (b) to remove
the language referring to an FCU’s
receipt of international and domestic
EFTs.
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
73994
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
The Board notes the amendment to
§ 701.30(b) will have no effect on FCUs.
The Board views the deletion of the
phrase ‘‘and receive international and
domestic electronic fund transfers’’ from
the Section 107(12)(B) of the FCU Act as
a housekeeping amendment. When
Congress adopted the phrase in Section
107(12)(B) through the Reg Relief Act, it
simply clarified the authority it granted
to FCUs in Section 107(12)(A). 12 U.S.C.
1757(12). Section 903 of the EFTA
defines ‘‘electronic fund transfer’’ as
‘‘any transfer of funds * * * initiated
through an electronic terminal,
telephonic instrument, or computer or
magnetic tape so as to order, instruct, or
authorize a financial institution to debit
or credit an account.’’ 15 U.S.C.
1693a(6); see also 12 CFR 205.3(b). By
allowing FCUs ‘‘to sell’’ international
and domestic EFTs in Section
107(12)(A) of the FCU Act, Congress
permitted FCUs to send or receive funds
upon instruction because, by definition,
EFTs are authorizations to debit or
credit an account. To read the power ‘‘to
sell’’ EFT services separately from the
ability to ‘‘receive’’ EFTs would be
wholly inconsistent with Congressional
intent to provide EFT services to
persons in the field of membership,
particularly for those who may not have
ready and affordable access to these
services. It would also be unfeasible for
an FCU to offer consumers the ability to
initiate transfers from their accounts but
not receive EFTs. As discussed above,
Congress clearly intended to promote
the availability of services to consumers
under Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank
Act by explicitly referencing remittance
transfers services. The amendment to
FCU Act Section 107(12)(B) was not
meant to restrict or otherwise limit an
FCU’s ability to effectively provide
services to consumers.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Summary of Public Comments
In response to the Board’s request for
comments, NCUA received only one
comment letter. The commenter, a
credit union trade association, fully
supported the interim rule and the
Board’s reading of Section 1073 of the
Dodd-Frank Act. The commenter agreed
the Dodd-Frank Act did not change
FCUs’ authorized business activities but
simply added ‘‘remittance transfers,’’ as
now defined by and regulated under the
EFTA, as an example of a type of
international electronic funds transfer
service. The commenter also had the
understanding that Congress’s deletion
from FCU Act Section 107(12) of the
express authority for persons within the
field of membership to receive
electronic funds transfers was simply to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Nov 29, 2011
Jkt 226001
remove redundant language and has no
substantive effect.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
III. Final Rule
When NCUA issues a final rule, as
defined in the Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedure Act, it triggers
a reporting requirement for
congressional review of agency rules,
under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
Public Law 104–121 (SBREFA). The
Office of Management and Budget has
determined that this rule is not a major
rule for purposes of SBREFA.
As discussed above, the Board is
adopting the interim final rule
published on July 27, 2011, 76 FR
44761, without change.
IV. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NCUA must prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a proposed rule may have on a
substantial number of small entities
(primarily those under ten million
dollars in assets) the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. This proposed rule
reduces compliance burden and extends
regulatory relief while maintaining
existing safety and soundness standards.
NCUA has determined this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small credit
unions, so NCUA is not required to
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this rule
will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and
Budget.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. NCUA, an
independent regulatory agency as
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily
complies with the executive order to
adhere to fundamental federalism
principles. This would not have a
substantial direct effect on the states, on
the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
NCUA has determined that this rule
will not affect family well-being within
the meaning of section 654 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law
105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on November 17, 2011.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
PART 701—ORGANIZATION AND
OPERATION OF FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
Accordingly, the interim final
amending 12 CFR part 701 which was
published at 76 FR 44761 on July 27,
2011, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
[FR Doc. 2011–30365 Filed 11–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 750
RIN 3133–AD73
Golden Parachute and Indemnification
Payments; Technical Correction
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NCUA is finalizing an interim
rule to make a technical correction to its
rule restricting a federally insured credit
union (FICU) from making golden
parachute and indemnification
payments to an institution-affiliated
party (IAP). The amendment corrects an
exception to the definition of golden
parachute payment pertaining to plans
offered under section 457 of the Internal
Revenue Code. The interim final rule
became effective on June 27, 2011. This
rulemaking finalizes the interim rule
without change.
DATES: Effective on November 30, 2011
NCUA is adopting the interim final rule
published on June 24, 2011, 76 FR
36979, without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Yu, Staff Attorney, Office of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 230 (Wednesday, November 30, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73993-73994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30365]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 30, 2011 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 73993]]
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133-AD94
Remittance Transfers
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending its rules to conform to amendments made to
the Federal Credit Union Act (FCU Act) by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). The final rule
adds remittance transfers, as now defined under the Electronic Fund
Transfer Act (EFTA), as an example of money transfer instruments
federal credit unions (FCUs) may provide to persons within their fields
of membership.
DATES: Effective on November 30, 2011 NCUA is adopting the interim
final rule published on July 27, 2011, 76 FR 44761, without change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chrisanthy Loizos, Staff Attorney,
Office of General Counsel, at the above address or telephone: (703)
518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Summary of Public Comments
III. Final Rule
IV. Regulatory Procedures
I. Background \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ President Obama signed the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111-274) into law on October 13, 2010 ``to improve the
effectiveness and accountability of federal agencies to the public
by promoting clear Government communication that the public can
understand and use.'' This preamble is written to meet plain writing
objectives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is NCUA adopting this rule?
Since 2006, FCUs have had the authority to provide certain
financial services to all persons within their fields of membership
under the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (Reg Relief
Act), Public Law 109-351. Congress intended to allow FCUs ``to sell
negotiable checks, money orders, and other similar transfer
instruments, including international and domestic electronic fund
transfers, to anyone eligible for membership, regardless of their
membership status.'' S. Rpt. 109-256, p. 5; H. Rpt. 109-356 Part 1, p.
63. As a result, NCUA created a rule, Sec. 701.30, to address an FCU's
authority to provide financial services to persons within its field of
membership. 71 FR 62875 (Oct. 27, 2006) (interim final rule); 72 FR
7927 (Feb. 22, 2007) (final rule).
Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act added a new Section 919 to the
EFTA, entitled ``Remittance Transfers.'' Public Law 111-203, Sec.
1073, 124 Stat. 2066 (2010). The new Section 919 of the EFTA creates
protections for consumers who, through remittance transfer providers,
send money to designated recipients located in foreign countries. 15
U.S.C. 1693o-1. Paragraph (d) of Section 1073 of Dodd-Frank amended the
FCU Act to specify that a remittance transfer, as defined by new
Section 919 of the EFTA, is an example of a money transfer instrument
that FCUs may sell to persons within their fields of membership. 12
U.S.C. 1757(12)(A).
Section 919(g)(2) of the EFTA, defines a remittance transfer as an
electronic transfer of funds requested by a sender to a designated
recipient that is initiated by a remittance transfer provider,
regardless of whether the sender has an account with the remittance
transfer provider or whether the transfer meets the statute's
definition of an electronic funds transfer (EFT). 15 U.S.C. 1693o-
1(g)(2). The law excludes small value transactions from the definition.
Remittance transfers, typically consumer to consumer payments, may be
executed through a variety of means, including international wire
transfers, international automated clearing house transactions, other
account-to-account or account-to-cash products, and reloadable prepaid
cards. The law requires remittance transfer providers to give consumers
certain disclosures, including a receipt that contains remittance
transfer fees, the exchange rate to be used by the remittance transfer
provider, the amount of currency to be received by the recipient and
the estimated date of delivery. In addition, the law requires the
sender to receive a statement that addresses error resolution rights.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve proposed a remittance
transfer rule, which addresses disclosure requirements and error
resolution, and provides a detailed analysis of the services offered by
remittance transfer providers. 99 FR 29902 (May 23, 2011). The Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau assumed responsibility for issuing the
final remittance transfer rule after the close of the comment period on
July 22, 2011.
FCUs have had the authority to transfer funds at the request of
consumers within their fields of membership to recipients
internationally since the adoption of the Reg Relief Act. The amendment
to the FCU Act's powers provision by the Dodd-Frank Act makes plain
that FCUs may offer all variations of remittance transfers, as now
defined by the EFTA, for the benefit of consumers within their fields
of membership, subject to certain consumer protections. The addition of
remittance transfers as an example of permissible money transfer
instruments, in addition to the newly-enacted consumer disclosures and
rights, demonstrate the clear intention of Congress to promote access
to remittance transfers and ensure protections for consumers.
Finally, Section 1073(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act adjusted Section
107(12) of the FCU Act by removing the reference to the receipt of
international and domestic EFTs from subparagraph (B). As explained
below, this simply eliminates a redundancy and does not affect the
ability of FCUs to offer EFT services.
What changes did the interim final rule make?
In the interim final rule, the NCUA Board (Board) amended Sec.
701.30 to directly track the statutory provisions of Section 1073 of
the Dodd-Frank Act. 76 FR 44761 (Jul. 27, 2011). The Board added
remittance transfers as defined by Section 919 of the EFTA as an
example of permissible money transfer instruments in paragraph (a). The
Board also amended paragraph (b) to remove the language referring to an
FCU's receipt of international and domestic EFTs.
[[Page 73994]]
The Board notes the amendment to Sec. 701.30(b) will have no
effect on FCUs. The Board views the deletion of the phrase ``and
receive international and domestic electronic fund transfers'' from the
Section 107(12)(B) of the FCU Act as a housekeeping amendment. When
Congress adopted the phrase in Section 107(12)(B) through the Reg
Relief Act, it simply clarified the authority it granted to FCUs in
Section 107(12)(A). 12 U.S.C. 1757(12). Section 903 of the EFTA defines
``electronic fund transfer'' as ``any transfer of funds * * * initiated
through an electronic terminal, telephonic instrument, or computer or
magnetic tape so as to order, instruct, or authorize a financial
institution to debit or credit an account.'' 15 U.S.C. 1693a(6); see
also 12 CFR 205.3(b). By allowing FCUs ``to sell'' international and
domestic EFTs in Section 107(12)(A) of the FCU Act, Congress permitted
FCUs to send or receive funds upon instruction because, by definition,
EFTs are authorizations to debit or credit an account. To read the
power ``to sell'' EFT services separately from the ability to
``receive'' EFTs would be wholly inconsistent with Congressional intent
to provide EFT services to persons in the field of membership,
particularly for those who may not have ready and affordable access to
these services. It would also be unfeasible for an FCU to offer
consumers the ability to initiate transfers from their accounts but not
receive EFTs. As discussed above, Congress clearly intended to promote
the availability of services to consumers under Section 1073 of the
Dodd-Frank Act by explicitly referencing remittance transfers services.
The amendment to FCU Act Section 107(12)(B) was not meant to restrict
or otherwise limit an FCU's ability to effectively provide services to
consumers.
II. Summary of Public Comments
In response to the Board's request for comments, NCUA received only
one comment letter. The commenter, a credit union trade association,
fully supported the interim rule and the Board's reading of Section
1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The commenter agreed the Dodd-Frank Act did
not change FCUs' authorized business activities but simply added
``remittance transfers,'' as now defined by and regulated under the
EFTA, as an example of a type of international electronic funds
transfer service. The commenter also had the understanding that
Congress's deletion from FCU Act Section 107(12) of the express
authority for persons within the field of membership to receive
electronic funds transfers was simply to remove redundant language and
has no substantive effect.
III. Final Rule
As discussed above, the Board is adopting the interim final rule
published on July 27, 2011, 76 FR 44761, without change.
IV. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NCUA must prepare an analysis to describe any significant economic
impact a proposed rule may have on a substantial number of small
entities (primarily those under ten million dollars in assets) the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. This proposed rule reduces compliance
burden and extends regulatory relief while maintaining existing safety
and soundness standards. NCUA has determined this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small credit
unions, so NCUA is not required to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this rule will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests.
NCUA, an independent regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive order to adhere to fundamental
federalism principles. This would not have a substantial direct effect
on the states, on the relationship between the national government and
the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. NCUA has determined that this rule
does not constitute a policy that has federalism implications for
purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this rule will not affect family well-
being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681
(1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
When NCUA issues a final rule, as defined in the Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedure Act, it triggers a reporting requirement for
congressional review of agency rules, under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121
(SBREFA). The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this
rule is not a major rule for purposes of SBREFA.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on November
17, 2011.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
Accordingly, the interim final amending 12 CFR part 701 which was
published at 76 FR 44761 on July 27, 2011, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
[FR Doc. 2011-30365 Filed 11-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P