Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2012, 73622-73631 [2011-30780]
Download as PDF
73622
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: November 16, 2011.
Lisa C. Lund,
Director, Office of Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2011–30782 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
available to provide technical assistance
to states and tribes as they apply for and
carry out these grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of
December 1, 2011. EPA expects to make
non-competitive grant awards to states
and tribes which apply during fiscal
year 2012.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for U.S.
EPA Regional Offices and U.S. EPA
Headquarters can be located at
www.epa.gov/brownfields.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
U.S. EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Office of
Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566–2892.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9497–8]
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section
128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal
Response Programs for FY2012
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 1, 2011
through January 31, 2012, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response
Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use
of funding, grant mechanisms and
process for awarding funding, the
allocation system for distribution of
funding, and terms and reporting under
these grants. EPA has consulted with
state and tribal officials in developing
this guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements and a public record. Another
goal is to provide funding for other
activities that increase the number of
response actions conducted or overseen
by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant
current state or tribal funding for their
response programs. Instead, it is to
supplement their funding to increase
their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2012, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.2 million per state or
tribe. Subject to the availability of
funds, EPA regional personnel will be
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant
program to establish and enhance state 1
and tribal 2 response programs. CERCLA
128(a) response program grants are
funded with ‘‘categorical’’ State and
Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG)
appropriations. Section 128(a)
cooperative agreements are awarded and
administered by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regional
offices. Generally, these response
programs address the assessment,
cleanup, and redevelopment of
brownfields sites and other sites with
actual or perceived contamination. This
document provides guidance that will
enable states and tribes to apply for and
use Fiscal Year 2012 section 128(a)
funds 3.
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance entry for the section 128(a)
State and Tribal Response Program
cooperative agreements is 66.817. This
grant program is eligible to be included
in state and tribal Performance
Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part
35 Subparts A and B, with the exception
of funds used to capitalize a revolving
loan fund for brownfield remediation
under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing
pool, an indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
1 The term ‘‘state’’ is defined in this document as
defined in CERCLA section 101(27).
2 The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ is defined in this
document as it is defined in CERCLA section
101(36). Intertribal consortia, as defined in the
Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4,
2002, are also eligible for funding under CERCLA
section 128(a).
3 The Agency may waive any provision of this
guidance that is not required by statute, regulation,
Executive Order or overriding Agency policies.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
response actions under a State or Tribal
response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted
from December 1, 2011, through January
31, 2012. Requests EPA receives after
January 31, 2012, will not be considered
for FY 2012 funding. Information that
must be submitted with the funding
request is listed in Section IX of this
guidance. States or tribes that do not
submit the request in the appropriate
manner may forfeit their ability to
receive funds. First time requestors are
strongly encouraged to contact their
Regional EPA Brownfields contacts,
listed on the last page of this guidance,
prior to submitting their funding
request.
Requests submitted by the January 31,
2012, request deadline are preliminary;
final cooperative agreement work plans
and budgets will be negotiated with the
regional offices once final funding
allocation determinations are made. As
in previous years, EPA will place
special emphasis on reviewing a
cooperative agreement recipient’s use of
prior section 128(a) funding in making
allocation decisions and unexpended
balances are subject to 40 CFR 35.118
and 40 CFR 35.518 to the extent
consistent with this guidance.
States and tribes requesting funds are
required to provide a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement’s final package.
For more information, please go to
https://www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs
oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields
sites across the country. The depth and
breadth of state and tribal response
programs vary. Some focus on CERCLA
related activities, while others are multifaceted, for example, addressing sites
regulated by both CERCLA and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). Many state programs also
offer accompanying financial incentive
programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In passing section
128(a) 4 Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal
response programs in cleaning up and
redeveloping brownfields sites. Section
128(a) also provides EPA with an
opportunity to strengthen its
partnership with states and tribes.
The primary goal of this funding is to
ensure that state and tribal response
programs include, or are taking
4 Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by
the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (Brownfield Amendments).
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
reasonable steps to include, certain
elements, and establish and maintain a
public record. The secondary goal is to
provide funding for other activities that
increase the number of response actions
conducted or overseen by a state or
tribal response program. This funding is
not intended to supplant current state or
tribal funding for their response
programs. Instead, it is to supplement
their funding to increase their response
program’s capacity.
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional personnel will be available
to provide technical assistance to states
and tribes as they apply for and carry
out section 128(a) cooperative
agreements.
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional personnel will be available
to provide technical assistance to states
and tribes as they apply for and carry
out Section 128(a) cooperative
agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under
CERCLA section 128(a), a state or tribe
must:
1. Demonstrate that its response
program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four
elements of a response program,
described in Section V of this guidance;
or be a party to voluntary response
program Memorandum of Agreement
(VRP MOA) 5 with EPA;
AND
2. Maintain and make available to the
public a record of sites at which
response actions have been completed
in the previous year and are planned to
be addressed in the upcoming year, see
CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to
provide matching funds for cooperative
agreements awarded under section
128(a), with the exception of the section
128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to
capitalize a Brownfields Revolving Loan
Fund under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
V. The Four Elements—Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not
have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements.
Achievement of the four elements
should be viewed as a priority. Section
128(a) authorizes funding for activities
necessary to establish and enhance the
5 States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs
and that maintain and make available a public
record are automatically eligible for section 128(a)
funding.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
73623
four elements, and to establish and
maintain the public record requirement.
The four elements of a response
program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites in state or tribal land.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to enable the state or
tribe to establish or enhance a system or
process that will provide a reasonable
estimate of the number, likely locations,
and the general characteristics of
brownfields sites in their state or tribal
lands. EPA recognizes the varied scope
of state and tribal response programs
and will not require states and tribes to
develop a ‘‘list’’ of brownfields sites.
However, at a minimum, the state or
tribe should develop and/or maintain a
system or process that can provide a
reasonable estimate of the number,
likely location, and general
characteristics of brownfields sites
within their state or tribal lands.
Inventories should evolve to a
prioritization of sites based on
community needs, planning priorities,
and protection of human health and the
environment.
Given funding limitations, EPA will
negotiate work plans with states and
tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and
effectively, and within a realistic time
frame. For example, many of EPA’s
Brownfields Assessment cooperative
agreement recipients conduct
inventories of brownfields sites in their
communities or jurisdictions. EPA
encourages states and tribes to work
with these cooperative agreement
recipients to obtain the information that
they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA’s goal in funding
activities under this element is to have
state and tribal response programs that
include oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms, and
resources that are adequate to ensure
that:
a. A response action will protect
human health and the environment, and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the
necessary response activities if the
person conducting the response
activities fails to complete the necessary
response activities (this includes
operation and maintenance and/or longterm monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation. 6 EPA’s goal in
funding activities under this element is
to have states and tribes include in their
response program mechanisms and
resources for meaningful public
participation, at the local level,
including, at a minimum:
a. Public access to documents and
related materials that a state, tribe, or
party conducting the cleanup is relying
on or developing in making cleanup
decisions or conducting site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for
meaningful public comment on cleanup
plans and site activities including the
input into the prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person
who is, or may be, affected by a release
or threatened release of a hazardous
substance, pollutant, or contaminant at
a brownfields site—located in the
community in which the person works
or resides—may request that a site
assessment be conducted. The
appropriate state or tribal official must
consider this request and appropriately
respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a
cleanup plan, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete.
EPA’s goal in funding activities under
this element is to have states and tribes
include in their response program
mechanisms to approve cleanup plans
and to verify that response actions are
complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation
from the state, the tribe, or a licensed
site professional that the response
action is complete. Written approval by
a state or tribal response program
official of a proposed cleanup plan is an
example of an approval mechanism.
6 States and tribes establishing this element may
find useful information on public participation on
EPA’s community involvement Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section
128(a) funding, states and tribes
(including those with MOAs) must
establish and maintain a public record
system, described below, in order to
receive funds. Specifically, under
section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes
must:
1. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions have been completed during the
previous year;
2. Maintain and update, at least
annually or more often as appropriate,
a record of sites that includes the name
and location of sites at which response
actions are planned to be addressed in
the next year; and
3. Identify in the public record
whether or not the site, upon
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
73624
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
completion of the response action, will
be suitable for unrestricted use. If not,
the public record must identify the
institutional controls relied on in the
remedy and include relevant
information concerning the entity that
will be responsible for oversight,
monitoring, and/or maintenance of the
institutional and engineering controls.
Section 128(a) funds may be used to
maintain and make available a public
record system that meets the
requirements discussed above.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Distinguishing the ‘‘Survey and
Inventory’’ Element From the ‘‘Public
Record’’
It is important to note that the public
record requirement differs from the
‘‘timely survey and inventory’’ element
described in the ‘‘Four Elements’’
section above. The public record
addresses sites at which response
actions have been completed in the
previous year and are planned to be
addressed in the upcoming year. In
contrast, the ‘‘timely survey and
inventory’’ element, described above,
refers to identifying brownfields sites
regardless of planned or completed
actions there.
B. Making the Public Record Easily
Accessible
EPA’s goal is to enable states and
tribes to make the public record and
other information, such as information
from the ‘‘survey and inventory’’
element, easily accessible. For this
reason, EPA will allow states and tribes
to use section 128(a) funding to make
the public record, as well as other
information, such as information from
the ‘‘survey and inventory’’ element,
available to the public via the internet
or other means. For example, the
Agency would support funding state
and tribal efforts to include detailed
location information in the public
record such as the street address, and
latitude and longitude information for
each site.7 States and tribes should
ensure that all affected communities
have appropriate access to the public
record including making it available online, in print at libraries, or other
community gathering places.
In an effort to reduce cooperative
agreement reporting requirements and
increase public access to the public
record, EPA encourages states and tribes
to place their public record on the
internet. If a state or tribe places the
public record on the internet, maintains
7 For further information on latitude and
longitude information, please see EPA’s data
standards web site available at https://
iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/
findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
the substantive requirements of the
public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for
purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record
reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public
Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to
maintain public record information,
including data on institutional controls,
on a long term basis (more than one
year) for sites at which a response action
has been completed. Subject to EPA
regional office approval, states or tribes
may include development and operation
of systems that ensure long term
maintenance of the public record,
including information on institutional
controls, in their work plans.8
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the
eligible uses of cooperative agreement
funds by states and tribes. In general, a
state or tribe may use a cooperative
agreement to ‘‘establish or enhance’’
their response programs, including
elements of the response program that
include activities related to responses at
brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities
include, but are not limited to, the
following:
• Developing legislation, regulations,
procedures, ordinances, guidance, etc.
that establish or enhance the
administrative and legal structure of
their response programs;
• Establishing and maintaining the
required public record described in
Section VI of this guidance;
• Maintaining and monitoring
institutional controls;
• Conducting site-specific activities,
such as assessment or cleanup, provided
such activities establish and/or enhance
the response program and are tied to the
four elements. In addition to the
requirement under CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public
comment on cleanup plans and site
activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input
regarding the priority of sites to be
addressed and solicit input from local
communities, especially potential
environmental justice communities,
communities with a health risk related
to exposure to hazardous waste or other
public health concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
8 States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on EPA’s institutional
controls web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/
policy/ic/index.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies. EPA
will not provide section 128(a) funds
solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific
activities must be part of an overall
section 128(a) work plan that includes
funding for other activities that establish
or enhance the four elements;
• Capitalizing a revolving loan fund
(RLF) for brownfields cleanup under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs
are subject to the same statutory
requirements and cooperative agreement
terms and conditions applicable to RLFs
awarded under section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent
match (can be in the form of a
contribution of money, labor, material,
or services from a non-federal source)
on the amount of section 128(a) funds
used for the RLF, a prohibition on using
EPA cooperative agreement funds for
administrative costs relating to the RLF,
and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for
which the recipient may be potentially
liable under section 107 of CERCLA.
Other prohibitions contained in
CERCLA section 104(k)(4) also apply;
and
• Purchasing environmental
insurance or developing a risk-sharing
pool, indemnity pool, or insurance
mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal
response program.
B. Uses Related To ‘‘Establishing’’ a
State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘establish’’ includes activities necessary
to build the foundation for the four
elements of a state or tribal response
program and the public record
requirement. For example, a state or
tribal response program may use section
128(a) funds to develop regulations,
ordinances, procedures, and/or
guidance. For more developed state or
tribal response programs, ‘‘establish’’
may also include activities that keep
their program at a level that meets the
four elements and maintains a public
record required as a condition of
funding under CERCLA section
128(b)(1)(C).
C. Uses Related To ‘‘Enhancing’’ a State
or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a),
‘‘enhance’’ is related to activities that
add to or improve a state or tribal
response program or increase the
number of sites at which response
actions are conducted under a state or
tribal response program.
The exact ‘‘enhancement’’ uses that
may be allowable depend upon the
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
work plan negotiated between the EPA
regional office and the state or tribe. For
example, regional offices and states or
tribes may agree that section 128(a)
funds may be used for outreach and
training directly related to increasing
awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It
may also include developing better
coordination and understanding of other
state response programs, e.g., RCRA or
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs). As
another example, states and tribal
response programs enhancement
activities can include outreach to local
communities to increase their awareness
and knowledge regarding the
importance of monitoring engineering
and institutional controls. Other
‘‘enhancement’’ uses may be allowable
as well.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities
1. Uses for Site-Specific Activities
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for site-specific activities
that improve state or tribal capacity. The
amount grantees may request for sitespecific assessments and cleanups may
not exceed 50% of the total amount of
funding. A grantee may request a waiver
to exceed the 50% of annual funding for
site specific activities. In order for EPA
to consider the waiver, the total amount
of the request may not exceed the
grantee’s prior year’s funding level. The
funding request must include a brief
justification describing the reason(s) for
spending more than 50% of an annual
allocation on site-specific activities. An
applicant must include the following
information in the written justification:
• What site specific activities will be
covered by this funding? If known,
provide site specific information and
describe the development or
enhancement of your state/tribal site
specific program. Further explain how
the community will be (or has been)
involved in prioritization of site work
and especially those sites where there is
a potential or known significant
environmental impact to the
community;
• How will the core programmatic
capacity (i.e., the four elements of a
response program) and related activities
be maintained in spite of an increase in
site-specific work? Grantees must
demonstrate that they have adequate
funding from other sources to effectively
carry out work on the four elements for
EPA to grant a waiver of the 50% limit
on using 128(a) funds for site-specific
activities;
• Describe how this shift in funding
towards site-specific work is more
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
appropriate for your response program
rather than a request for an increase in
overall funding; and
• Are the sites to be addressed those
which the affected community(ies) has
requested an assessment (refer to
Overview of Funding section of this
notice for more information)? Please
explain.
EPA Headquarters will determine
approval of waivers on the information
that is included in the justification
along with the request for funding, as
well as other information available to
the Agency. EPA’s Regional Brownfield
Coordinators will inform grantees of the
Agency’s final decision(s).
2. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup
activities should establish and/or
enhance the response program and be
tied to the four elements. Site-specific
assessments and cleanups must comply
with all applicable laws and are subject
to the following restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be
used for assessments or cleanups at sites
that meet the definition of a brownfields
site at CERCLA section 101(39). EPA
encourages states and tribes to use sitespecific funding to perform assessment
(e.g., phase II and phase III assessments)
and cleanup activities that will lead
more quickly to the reuse of sites;
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than
$200,000 per site assessment can be
funded with section 128(a) funds, and
no more than $200,000 per site cleanup
can be funded with section 128(a)
funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/
tribe may not use funds awarded under
this agreement to assess and clean up
sites owned or operated by the
recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot
be conducted at sites where the state/
tribe is a potentially responsible party
pursuant to CERCLA section 107,
except:
• At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
• When the recipient would satisfy
all of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to
entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to
CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup
activities are proposed to be conducted,
except:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73625
1. At brownfields sites contaminated
by a controlled substance as defined in
CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. when the recipient would satisfy all
of the elements set forth in CERCLA
section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide
prospective purchaser except that the
date of acquisition of the property was
on or before January 11, 2002.
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific
Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section
128(a) funds for activities that establish
and enhance their response programs,
even if their response programs address
petroleum contamination. Also, the
costs of site-specific activities, such as
site assessments or cleanup at
petroleum contaminated brownfields
sites, defined at CERCLA section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are eligible and are
allowable if the activity is included in
the work plan negotiated between the
EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize a Brownfields RLF may be
used at brownfields sites contaminated
by petroleum to the extent allowed
under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Other Eligible Uses of Funding
Other eligible uses of funds for sitespecific related include, but are not
limited to, the following activities:
• Technical assistance to federal
brownfields cooperative agreement
recipients;
• Development and/or review of
quality assurance project plans (QAPPs);
and
• Preparation and submission of
Property Profile Forms and/or entering
data into the ACRES database
E. Uses Related to Activities at ‘‘NonBrownfields’’ Sites
Costs incurred for activities at nonbrownfields sites, e.g., oversight, may be
eligible and allowable if such activities
are included in the state’s or tribe’s
work plan. These costs need not be
incurred in connection with a
brownfields site to be eligible, but must
be authorized under the state’s or tribe’s
work plan to be allowable. Other uses
may be eligible and allowable as well,
depending upon the work plan
negotiated between the EPA regional
office and the state or tribe. However,
assessment and cleanup activities may
only be conducted on eligible
brownfields sites, as defined in CERCLA
section 101(39).
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
73626
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines
For 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA
section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement 9 with a state or
tribe. The program is administered
under the general EPA grant and
cooperative agreement regulations for
states, tribes, and local governments
found in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 40 CFR Part 31 as well as
applicable provisions of 40 CFR part 35
Subparts A and B. Under these
regulations, the cooperative agreement
recipient for section 128(a) grant
program is the government to which a
cooperative agreement is awarded and
which is accountable for the use of the
funds provided. The cooperative
agreement recipient is the entire legal
entity even if only a particular
component of the entity is designated in
the cooperative agreement award
document. Further, unexpended
balances of cooperative agreement funds
are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR
35.518 to the extent consistent with this
guidance. EPA allocates funds to state
and tribal response programs under 40
CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737
A. One Application per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds,
EPA regional offices will negotiate and
enter into section 128(a) cooperative
agreements with eligible and interested
states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or
tribe.
B. Define the State or Tribal Response
Program
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
States and tribes must define in their
work plan the ‘‘section 128(a) response
program(s)’’ to which the funds will be
applied, and may designate a
component of the state or tribe that will
be EPA’s primary point of contact for
negotiations on their proposed work
plan. When EPA funds the section
128(a) cooperative agreement, states and
tribes may distribute these funds among
the appropriate state and tribal agencies
that are part of the section 128(a)
response program. This distribution
must be clearly outlined in their annual
work plan.
C. Separate Cooperative Agreements for
the Capitalization of RLFs Using Section
128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant
funds requested will be used to
9 A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a
state/tribe that includes substantial involvement by
EPA on activities described in the work plan which
may include technical assistance, collaboration on
program priorities, etc.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
capitalize a revolving loan fund for
cleanup, pursuant to section 104(k)(3),
two separate cooperative agreements
must be awarded, i.e., one for the RLF
and one for non-RLF uses. States and
tribes may, however, submit one initial
request for funding, delineating the RLF
as a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds
used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority To Manage a Revolving
Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its
section 128(a) funds to capitalize a
revolving loan fund program, the state
or tribe must have the authority to
manage the program, e.g., issue loans. If
the agency/department listed as the
point of contact for the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement does not have
this authority, it must be able to
demonstrate that another state or tribal
agency does have the authority to
manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
E. Section 128(A) Cooperative
Agreements Can Be Part of a
Performance Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section
128(a) cooperative agreements in their
PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section 128(a)
funds used to capitalize an RLF or
purchase insurance or develop a risk
sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a
state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
F. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine
the project period for each cooperative
agreement. These may be for multiple
years depending on the regional office’s
cooperative agreement policies. Each
cooperative agreement must have an
annual budget period tied to an annual
work plan. Pre-award costs are subject
to 40 CFR 35.113 and 40 CFR 35.513.
G. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan
negotiation process, states or tribes that
do not have VRP MOAs must
demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to
include, the four elements described in
Section V. EPA will not fund, in future
years, state or tribal response program
annual work plans if EPA determines
that these requirements are not met or
reasonable progress is not being made.
EPA may base this determination on the
information the state or tribe provides to
support its work plan, or on EPA’s
review of the state or tribal response
program.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
H. Establishing and Maintaining the
Public Record
Prior to funding a state’s or tribe’s
annual work plan, EPA regional offices
will verify and document that a public
record, as described in Section VI and
below, exists and is being maintained.10
Specifically:
• States or tribes that received initial
funding prior to FY11: Requests for
FY12 funds will not be accepted from
states or tribes that fail to demonstrate,
by the January 31, 2012, request
deadline, that they established and are
maintaining a public record. (Note, this
would potentially impact any state or
tribe that had a term and condition
placed on their FY11 cooperative
agreement that prohibited drawdown of
FY11 funds prior to meeting public
record requirement). States or tribes in
this situation will not be prevented from
drawing down their prior year funds,
once the public record requirement is
met, but will be restricted from applying
for FY12 funding; and
• States or Tribes that received initial
funding in FY11: By the time of the
actual FY12 award, the state or tribe
must demonstrate that they established
and maintained the public record (those
states and tribes that do not meet this
requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY12
cooperative agreement that prevents the
drawdown of FY12 funds until the
public record requirement is met).
I. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
States and tribes should be aware that
EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees are
concerned regarding the amount of
unexpended balances of STAG
categorical grants. During the allocation
process, EPA headquarters places
significant emphasis on the utilization
of prior years’ funding. Unused funds
from prior years will be considered in
the allocation process. Existing balances
of cooperative agreement funds as
reflected in EPA’s Financial Data
Warehouse could support an allocation
amount below a grantee’s request for
funding or, if appropriate, deobligation
and reallocation by EPA Regions as
provided for in 40 CFR 35.118 and 40
CFR 35.518. Grantees should include a
detailed explanation and justification of
funds that remain in EPA’s Financial
Data Warehouse from prior years (that
are related to response program
10 For purposes of cooperative agreement funding,
the state’s or tribe’s public record applies to that
state’s or tribe’s response program(s) that utilized
the section 128(a) funding.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
activities or brownfield related
activities).
EPA Regional staff will review EPA’s
Financial Database Warehouse to
identify the amount of remaining prior
year(s) funds. The cooperative
agreement recipient should work, as
early as possible, with both their own
finance department, and with their
Regional Project Officer to reconcile any
discrepancy between the amount of
unspent funds showing in EPA’s
system, and the amount reflected in the
recipient’s records. The recipient should
obtain concurrence from the Region on
proposed work plan balanced against
capacity of the program, amount of
current year funding, funds remaining
from prior years, etc.
After receipt of the regional
recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate
funds accordingly.
In FY13 the maximum amount that
EPA will consider for a funding request
will likely decrease at a rate up to 30%
a year, and could decrease at a greater
rate depending on enacted
Congressional budget amounts and
demand for funding.
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
A. Demonstration of Significant
Utilization of Prior Years’ Funding
States and tribes requesting section
128(a) FY12 funds must submit the
following information, as applicable, to
their regional brownfield contact on or
FY12
Requested
....................
B. Summary of Planned Use of FY12
Funding
Summary of intended use
(example uses)
$XX,XXX
....................
EPA regional offices will work with
interested states and tribes to develop
their preliminary work plans and
funding requests. Final cooperative
agreement work plans and budgets will
be negotiated with the regional office
once final allocation determinations are
made. Please refer to process flow chart
below:
before January 31, 2012. If a grantee
wishes to avoid an allocation reduction,
when submitting a request for FY12
funds, include a detailed explanation
and justification of funds that remain in
EPA’s financial Data Warehouse from
prior years (that are related to response
program activities or brownfield related
activities).
For those states and tribes that
received FY10 or prior section 128(a)
funds, you must provide the amount of
prior years’ funding including FY10
funds that recipients have not received
in payments (i.e., funds EPA has
obligated for grants that remain in EPA’s
Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will
take into account these funds in the
allocation process when determining
the recipient’s programmatic needs
under 40 CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR
35.737.
IX. Information to be Submitted With
the Funding Request
$XX,XXX
11 FY11 EPA received $64.9 Million in requests
for funding from States and Tribes under CERCLA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Please describe the effects, if any, of
a 10% and 20% reduction in your
current funding amount on significant
activities of your response program.
Specifically, where would the decrease
in funding be realized (e.g. reduction in
staff, decrease in oversight activities, or
other impacts to the environment and
Jkt 226001
1. Examples:
• Inventory and prioritize brownfields sites.
128(a). The FY11 enacted budget was $49.5 Million.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The resulting budget shortfall was approximately
$ 15.4 Million.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
EN29NO11.038
All states and tribes requesting FY12
funds must submit a summary of
the planned use of the funds with
associated dollar amounts. Please
provide the request in the following:
Establish or enhance the four elements:
1. Timely survey and inventory of
brownfields sites.
K. Allocation System and Process for
Distribution of Funds
J. Optional: Explanation of Overall
Program Impacts of Possible Funding
Reductions
FY11
Awarded
Funding use
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
health of the communities the program
serves, etc.) in your program?
the amount of unspent funds requiring
justification by the deadline for this
request for funding.
For Fiscal Year 2012, EPA will
consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.2 million per state or
tribe. Please note the CERCLA 128(a)
annual program’s budget has remained
static while demand for funding
continues to increase every year.11
Therefore, it is likely that the FY12 state
and tribal individual funding amounts
will be less than the FY11 individual
funding amounts.
After the January 31, 2012, request
deadline, EPA’s Regional Offices will
submit summaries of state and tribal
requests to EPA Headquarters. Before
submitting requests to EPA
Headquarters, Regional Offices may take
into account additional factors when
determining recommended allocation
amounts. Such factors include, but are
not limited to, the depth and breadth of
the state or tribal program; scope of the
perceived need for the funding, e.g., size
of state or tribal jurisdiction or the
73627
73628
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
FY11
Awarded
FY12
Requested
Summary of intended use
(example uses)
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities or other mechanisms.
3. Mechanisms and resources to
provide meaningful opportunities for public participation.
....................
....................
....................
....................
4. Mechanisms or approval of a
cleanup plan and verification
and certification that cleanup is
complete.
Establish and maintain the public
record.
....................
....................
2. Examples:
• Develop/enhance ordinances, regulations, procedures for response
programs.
3. Examples:
• Develop a community involvement process.
• Fund an outreach coordinator.
• Issue public notices of site activities.
• Develop a process to seek public input from local communities, especially potential environmental justice communities, communities with a
health risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities
with limited experience working with government agencies to prioritize sites
to be addressed.
4. Examples:
• Review cleanup plans and verify completed actions.
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Enhance the response program .........
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Site-specific activities (amount requested should be incidental to the
workplan, see Section VII.D for
more information on what activities
should be considered when calculating site specific activities).
Environmental insurance ....................
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
$XX,XXX
Revolving loan fund ............................
Total funding ........................
$XX,XXX
$XXX,XXX
$XX,XXX
$XXX,XXX
Funding use
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and
tribal response programs will include
programmatic and administrative terms
and conditions. These terms and
conditions will describe EPA’s
substantial involvement including
technical assistance and collaboration
on program development and sitespecific activities. Each of the
subsections below summarizes the basic
terms and conditions, and related
reporting that will be required if a
cooperative agreement with EPA is
awarded.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40,
state and tribes must provide progress
reports as provided in the terms and
conditions of the cooperative agreement
negotiated with EPA regional offices.
State and tribal costs for complying with
reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must
include both a narrative discussion and
performance data relating to the state’s
or tribe’s accomplishments and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
• Maintain public record.
• Create web site for public record.
• Disseminate public information on how to access the public record.
• Provide oversight of site assessments and cleanups.
• Attend training and conferences on brownfields cleanup technologies
& Other brownfields topics.
• Update and enhance program management activities.
• Negotiate/oversee contracts for response programs.
• Enhance program management & tracking systems.
• Perform site assessments and cleanups.
• Develop QAPPs.
• Prepare Property Profile Forms/input data into ACRES database for
these sites.
• Review potential uses of environmental insurance.
• Manage an insurance risk pool.
• Create a cleanup revolving loan fund.
Performance Partnership Grant? Yes b No b
environmental outputs associated with
the approved budget and workplan, and
should provide an accounting of section
128(a) funding. If applicable, the state or
tribe must include information on
activities related to establishing or
enhancing the four elements of the
state’s or tribe’s response program. All
recipients must provide information
relating to establishing or, if already
established, maintaining the public
record. Depending upon the activities
included in the state’s or tribe’s work
plan, an EPA regional office may request
that a progress report include:
1. Reporting environmental insurance.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for environmental insurance
must report:
• Number and description of
insurance policies purchased (e.g., type
of coverage provided; dollar limits of
coverage; any buffers or deductibles;
category and identity of insured
persons; premium; first dollar or
umbrella; site specific or blanket;
occurrence or claims made, etc.);
• The number of sites covered by the
insurance;
• The amount of funds spent on
environmental insurance (e.g., amount
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
dedicated to insurance program, or to
insurance premiums); and
• The amount of claims paid by
insurers to policy holders.
2. Reporting for site-specific
assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include
funding for brownfields site assessment
or cleanup must input information
required by the OMB-approved Property
Profile Form into the Assessment
Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange
System (ACRES) database for each site
assessment and cleanup. In addition,
recipients must report how they provide
the affected community with prior
notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(C)(ii) on proposed cleanup
plans and site activities. For example,
EPA strongly encourages states and
tribes to seek public input regarding the
priority of sites to be addressed and
solicit input from local communities,
especially potential environmental
justice communities, communities with
a health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged
or remote areas, and communities with
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
limited experience working with
government agencies.
3. Reporting for other site-specific
activities. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for other sitespecific related activities must include a
description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the
activity was conducted. For example:
• Number and frequency of oversight
audits of licensed site professional
certified cleanups;
• Number and frequency of state/
tribal oversight audits conducted;
• Number of sites where staff
conducted audits, provided technical
assistance, or conducted other oversight
activities; and
• Number of staff conducting
oversight audits, providing technical
assistance, or conducting other
oversight activities.
4. Reporting for RLF uses. Recipients
with work plans that include funding
for revolving loan fund (RLF) must
include the information required by the
terms and conditions for progress
reporting under CERCLA section
104(k)(3) RLF cooperative agreements.
5. Reporting for Non-MOA states and
tribes. All recipients without a VRP
MOA must report activities related to
establishing or enhancing the four
elements of the state’s or tribe’s
response program. For each element
state/tribes must report how they are
maintaining the element or how they are
taking reasonable steps to establish or
enhance the element as negotiated in
individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section
128(a)(2)(B), reports on the oversight
and enforcement authorities/
mechanisms element may include:
• A narrative description and copies
of applicable documents developed or
under development to enable the
response program to conduct
enforcement and oversight at sites. For
example:
Æ Legal authorities and mechanisms
(e.g., statutes, regulations, orders,
agreements); and
Æ Policies and procedures to
implement legal authorities; and other
mechanisms;
• A description of the resources and
staff allocated/to be allocated to the
response program to conduct oversight
and enforcement at sites as a result of
the cooperative agreement;
• A narrative description of how
these authorities or other mechanisms,
and resources, are adequate to ensure
that:
Æ A response action will protect
human health and the environment; and
be conducted in accordance with
applicable federal and state law; and if
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
the person conducting the response
action fails to complete the necessary
response activities, including operation
and maintenance or long-term
monitoring activities, the necessary
response activities are completed; and
• A narrative description and copy of
appropriate documents demonstrating
the exercise of oversight and
enforcement authorities by the response
program at a brownfields site.
The regional offices may also request
other information be added to the
progress reports, as appropriate, to
properly document activities described
by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes
to provide performance data in
appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward
progress reports to EPA Headquarters, if
requested. This information may be
used to develop national reports on the
outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a)
funding to states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by
January 31, 2012, a summary of the
previous federal fiscal year’s work
(October 1, 2010 through September 30,
2011). The following information must
be submitted to your regional project
officer:
• Category(ies) of properties (or sites)
that CERCLA 128(a) funds are used for
capacity building and/or site-specific
activities:
—Brownfields
—Underground Storage Tanks/Leaking
Underground Storage Tanks
—Federal Facilities
—Solid Waste
—Superfund
—Hazardous Waste Facilities
—VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program,
Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
—Other_____
• Number of properties (or sites)
enrolled in a response program during
FY11;
• Number of properties (or sites)
where documentation indicates that
cleanup work is complete and all
required institutional controls (IC’s) are
in place, or not required;
• Total number of acres associated
with properties (or sites) in the previous
bullet; and
• Number of properties where
assistance was provided, but the
property was not enrolled in the
response program (OPTIONAL).
Where applicable, EPA may require
states/tribes to report specific
performance measures related to the
four elements which can be aggregated
for national reporting to Congress.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73629
For example:
1. Timely survey and inventory—
estimated number of brownfields sites
in the state or on tribal land;
2. Oversight and enforcement
authorities/mechanisms—number of
active cleanups and percentage that
received oversight; percentage of active
cleanups not in compliance with the
cleanup workplan and that received
communications from recipient
regarding non-compliance;
3. Public participation—percentage of
sites in the response program where
public meetings/notices were conducted
regarding the cleanup plan and/or other
site activities; number of requests and
responses to site assessment requests;
and
4. Cleanup approval/certification
mechanisms—total number of ‘‘no
further action’’ letters or total number of
certificate of completions.
Note: Where applicable, this reporting
requirement may include activities not
funded with CERCLA section 128(a) monies,
because this information may be used by EPA
to evaluate whether recipients without MOAs
have met or are taking reasonable steps to
meet the four elements of a response program
pursuant to CERCLA section 128(a)(2).
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as
specified in the terms and conditions of
their cooperative agreement,
information related to establishing or, if
already established, maintaining the
public record, described above. States
and tribes can refer to an already
existing public record, e.g., Web site or
other public database to meet the public
record requirement. Recipients
reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record a)
exists and is up-to-date, and b) is
adequate. A public record may include
the following information:
A list of sites at which response
actions have been completed including:
• Date the response action was
completed;
• Site name;
• Name of owner at time of cleanup,
if known;
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• Whether an institutional control is
in place;
• Type of institutional control in
place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• Nature of the contamination at the
site (e.g., hazardous substances,
contaminants or pollutants, petroleum
contamination, etc.); and
• Size of the site in acres.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
73630
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
A list of sites planned to be addressed
by the state or tribal response program
including:
• Site name and the name of owner
at time of cleanup, if known;
• Location of the site (street address,
and latitude and longitude);
• To the extent known, whether an
institutional control is in place;
• Type of the institutional control in
place (e.g., deed restriction, zoning
restriction, local ordinance, state
registries of contaminated property,
deed notices, advisories, etc.);
• To the extent known, the nature of
the contamination at the site (e.g.,
hazardous substances, contaminants, or
pollutants, petroleum contamination,
etc.); and
• Size of the site in acres
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive
Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they
have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the
subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements
established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 170, unless they qualify for an
exception from the requirements,
should they be selected for funding.
2. Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
and Data Universal Numbering System
(DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these
requirements under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 25 (e.g., individuals),
applicants must:
A. Register in the CCR prior to
submitting an application or proposal
under this announcement. CCR
information can be found at https://
www.bpn.gov/ccr/;
B. Maintain an active CCR registration
with current information at all times
during which it has an active federal
award or an application or proposal
under consideration by an agency, and
C. Provide its DUNS number in each
application or proposal it submits to the
agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS
number, at no cost, by visiting the D&B
Web site at: https://iupdate.dnb.com/
iUpdate/companylookup.htm.
Failure to comply with these
requirements will affect the applicant’s
ability to receive any funding.
3. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award
under this announcement is expected to
manage assistance agreement funds
efficiently and effectively, and make
sufficient progress towards completing
the project activities described in the
work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include
terms/conditions implementing this
requirement.
REGIONAL STATE AND TRIBAL BROWNFIELDS CONTACTS
Region
State
Tribal
1
CT, ME, MA, NH,
RI, VT.
2
NJ, NY, PR, VI ........
3
DE, DC, MD, PA,
VA, WV.
4
AL, FL, GA, KY, MS,
NC, SC, TN.
5
IL, IN, MI, MN, OH,
WI.
6
AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
James Byrne, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (OSRR07–
2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617) 918–1389 Fax
(617) 918–1291.
John Struble, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY
10007, Phone (212) 637–4291 Fax (212) 637–4211.
Janice Bartel, 1650 Arch Street (3HS51), Philadelphia, PA
19103, Phone (215) 814–5394 Fax (215) 814–3274.
AmyJean McKeown, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone (617)
918–1248 Fax (617) 918–1291.
John Struble, 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY
10007, Phone (212) 637–4291 Fax (212) 637–4211.
Nicole Comick-Bates, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 10TH FL
(9T25), Atlanta, GA 30303–8909, Phone (404) 562–9966
Fax (404) 562–8788.
Jan Pels, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–7J), Chicago, IL
60604–3507, Phone (312) 886–3009 Fax (312) 692–
2161.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF), Dallas,
TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–3172 Fax (214) 665–
6660.
Susan Klein, 901 N. 5th Street (SUPRSTAR), Kansas City,
KS 66101, Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913) 551–9786.
Christina Wilson, 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–B), Denver,
CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6706 Fax (303) 312–
6065.
Eugenia Chow, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1), San Francisco, CA 94105, Phone (415) 972–3160 Fax (415) 947–
3520.
Deborah Burgess, 300 Desmond Dr. SE., Suite 102
(WOO), Lacey, WA 98503, Phone (360) 753–9079 Fax
(360) 753–8080.
Cindy J. Nolan, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 10TH FL (9T25),
Atlanta, GA 30303–8909, Phone (404) 562–8425 Fax
(404) 562–8788.
Jane Neumann, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE–7J), Chicago, IL 60604–3507, Phone (312) 353–0123 Fax (312)
697–2649.
Amber Perry, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF), Dallas,
TX 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–3172 Fax (214) 665–
6660.
Susan Klein, 901 N. 5th Street (SUPRSTAR), Kansas City,
KS 66101, Phone (913) 551–7786 Fax (913) 551–9798.
Barbara Benoy, 1595 Wynkoop Street (8EPR–SA), Denver,
CO 80202–1129, Phone (303) 312–6760 Fax (303) 312–
6962.
Glenn Kistner, 75 Hawthorne St. (SFD–6–1), San Francisco, CA 94105, Phone (415) 972–3004 Fax (415) 947–
3520.
Deborah Burgess, 300 Desmond Dr. SE., Suite 102
(WOO), Lacey, WA 98503, Phone (360) 753–9079 Fax
(360) 753–8080.
7
IA, KS, MO, NE ......
8
CO, MT, ND, SD,
UT, WY.
9
AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS,
GU.
10
AK, ID, OR, WA ......
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to OMB review.
Because this action is not subject to
notice and comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedures
Act or any other statute, it is not subject
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or Sections 202 and
205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub.L. 104–4). In
addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action does not
create new binding legal requirements
that substantially and directly affect
Tribes under Executive Order 13175 (63
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action does not have significant
Federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994). This action does not involve
technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before
certain actions may take effect, the
agency promulgating the action must
submit a report, which includes a copy
of the action, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Because this final
action does not contain legally binding
requirements, it is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act.
Dated: November 22, 2011.
David R. Lloyd,
Director, Office of Brownfields and Land
Revitalization, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2011–30780 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9497–5]
Good Neighbor Environmental Board
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, Public Law 92463, EPA
gives notice of a meeting of the Good
Neighbor Environmental Board (Board).
The Board usually meets three times
each calendar year, twice at different
locations along the U.S. border with
Mexico, and once in Washington, DC It
was created in 1992 by the Enterprise
for the Americas Initiative Act, Public
Law 102–532, 7 U.S.C. 5404.
Implementing authority was delegated
to the Administrator of EPA under
Executive Order 12916. The Board is
responsible for providing advice to the
President and the Congress on
environmental and infrastructure issues
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
and needs within the States contiguous
to Mexico in order to improve the
quality of life of persons residing on the
United States side of the border. The
statute calls for the Board to have
representatives from U.S. Government
agencies; the states of Arizona,
California, New Mexico and Texas; and
tribal and private organizations with
experience in environmental and
infrastructure issues along the US–
Mexico border.
The purpose of the meeting is to
finalize the Board’s 14th report, which
will focus on the environmental and
economic benefits of renewable energy
development in the border region. A
copy of the meeting agenda will be
posted at https://www.epa.gov/ocem/
gneb.
DATES: The Good Neighbor
Environmental Board will hold an open
meeting on Wednesday December 14,
from 9 a.m. (registration at 8:30 a.m.) to
12:30 p.m. The following day, December
15, the Board will meet from 8:30 a.m.
until 2 p.m. Due to funding
uncertainties, EPA is announcing the
meeting with less than 15 days public
notice.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
EPA Headquarters 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, in
Ariel Rios North, Room 3000. The
meeting is open to the public, with
limited seating on a first-come, firstserved basis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Joyce, Acting Designated Federal
Officer, joyce.mark@epa.gov, (202) 564–
2130, U.S. EPA, Office of Federal
Advisory Committee Management and
Outreach (1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you
wish to make oral comments or submit
written comments to the Board, please
contact Mark Joyce at least five days
prior to the meeting.
General Information: Additional
information concerning the GNEB can
be found on its Web site at
www.epa.gov/ocem/gneb.
Meeting Access: For information on
access or services for individuals with
disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at
(202) 564–2130 or by email at
joyce.mark@epa.gov. To request
accommodation of a disability, please
contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior
to the meeting to give EPA as much time
as possible to process your request.
Dated: November 17, 2011.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–30708 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73631
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9497–6]
Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities
Committee
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, Public Law 92–463,
EPA gives notice of a meeting of the
Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities
Committee (FRRCC). The FRRCC is a
policy-oriented committee that provides
policy advice, information, and
recommendations to the EPA
Administrator on a range of
environmental issues and policies that
are of importance to agriculture and
rural communities.
The purpose of this meeting is to
review and finalize recommendations
regarding effective approaches to
addressing water quality issues
associated with agricultural production.
DATES: The Farm, Ranch, and Rural
Communities Committee will hold an
open meeting on Monday, December 12,
2011 from 10 a.m. until 12 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time. Due to logistical
circumstances, EPA is announcing this
meeting with less than 15 calendar days
public notice.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
EPA Headquarters at 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460 in
Ariel Rios North, Room 3530. The
meeting is open to the public, with
limited seating on a first-come, firstserved basis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal
Officer, kaiser.alicia@epa.gov, (202)
564–7273, U.S. EPA, Office of the
Administrator (1101A), 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20460.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to
time constraints and the need for the
Committee to discuss its
recommendations, there will not be an
opportunity for the public to make oral
comments at this meeting. However,
written comments may be submitted
and will be provided to the Committee.
Please send all written comments to
Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal
Officer, at the contact information
above. All requests must be submitted
no later than December 5, 2011.
Meeting Access: For information on
access or services for individuals with
disabilities, please contact Alicia Kaiser
at (202) 564–7273 or
kaiser.alicia@epa.gov. To request
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73622-73631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30780]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9497-8]
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) or Superfund, Section 128(a); Notice of Grant Funding
Guidance for State and Tribal Response Programs for FY2012
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will begin to accept
requests, from December 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012, for grants to
supplement State and Tribal Response Programs. This notice provides
guidance on eligibility for funding, use of funding, grant mechanisms
and process for awarding funding, the allocation system for
distribution of funding, and terms and reporting under these grants.
EPA has consulted with state and tribal officials in developing this
guidance.
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking reasonable steps to include,
certain elements and a public record. Another goal is to provide
funding for other activities that increase the number of response
actions conducted or overseen by a state or tribal response program.
This funding is not intended to supplant current state or tribal
funding for their response programs. Instead, it is to supplement their
funding to increase their response capacity.
For fiscal year 2012, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.2 million per state or tribe. Subject to the availability
of funds, EPA regional personnel will be available to provide technical
assistance to states and tribes as they apply for and carry out these
grants.
DATES: This action is effective as of December 1, 2011. EPA expects to
make non-competitive grant awards to states and tribes which apply
during fiscal year 2012.
ADDRESSES: Mailing addresses for U.S. EPA Regional Offices and U.S. EPA
Headquarters can be located at www.epa.gov/brownfields.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The U.S. EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization,
(202) 566-2892.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
Section 128(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, authorizes a
noncompetitive $50 million grant program to establish and enhance state
\1\ and tribal \2\ response programs. CERCLA 128(a) response program
grants are funded with ``categorical'' State and Tribal Assistance
Grant (STAG) appropriations. Section 128(a) cooperative agreements are
awarded and administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) regional offices. Generally, these response programs address the
assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of brownfields sites and other
sites with actual or perceived contamination. This document provides
guidance that will enable states and tribes to apply for and use Fiscal
Year 2012 section 128(a) funds \3\.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``state'' is defined in this document as defined in
CERCLA section 101(27).
\2\ The term ``Indian tribe'' is defined in this document as it
is defined in CERCLA section 101(36). Intertribal consortia, as
defined in the Federal Register Notice at 67 FR 67181, Nov. 4, 2002,
are also eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a).
\3\ The Agency may waive any provision of this guidance that is
not required by statute, regulation, Executive Order or overriding
Agency policies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance entry for the section
128(a) State and Tribal Response Program cooperative agreements is
66.817. This grant program is eligible to be included in state and
tribal Performance Partnership Grants under 40 CFR part 35 Subparts A
and B, with the exception of funds used to capitalize a revolving loan
fund for brownfield remediation under section 104(k)(3); or purchase
insurance or develop a risk sharing pool, an indemnity pool, or
insurance mechanism to provide financing for response actions under a
State or Tribal response program.
Requests for funding will be accepted from December 1, 2011,
through January 31, 2012. Requests EPA receives after January 31, 2012,
will not be considered for FY 2012 funding. Information that must be
submitted with the funding request is listed in Section IX of this
guidance. States or tribes that do not submit the request in the
appropriate manner may forfeit their ability to receive funds. First
time requestors are strongly encouraged to contact their Regional EPA
Brownfields contacts, listed on the last page of this guidance, prior
to submitting their funding request.
Requests submitted by the January 31, 2012, request deadline are
preliminary; final cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be
negotiated with the regional offices once final funding allocation
determinations are made. As in previous years, EPA will place special
emphasis on reviewing a cooperative agreement recipient's use of prior
section 128(a) funding in making allocation decisions and unexpended
balances are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518 to the extent
consistent with this guidance.
States and tribes requesting funds are required to provide a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number with their
cooperative agreement's final package. For more information, please go
to https://www.grants.gov.
II. Background
State and tribal response programs oversee assessment and cleanup
activities at the majority of brownfields sites across the country. The
depth and breadth of state and tribal response programs vary. Some
focus on CERCLA related activities, while others are multi-faceted, for
example, addressing sites regulated by both CERCLA and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Many state programs also offer
accompanying financial incentive programs to spur cleanup and
redevelopment. In passing section 128(a) \4\ Congress recognized the
accomplishments of state and tribal response programs in cleaning up
and redeveloping brownfields sites. Section 128(a) also provides EPA
with an opportunity to strengthen its partnership with states and
tribes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 128(a) was added to CERCLA in 2002 by the Small
Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
(Brownfield Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary goal of this funding is to ensure that state and tribal
response programs include, or are taking
[[Page 73623]]
reasonable steps to include, certain elements, and establish and
maintain a public record. The secondary goal is to provide funding for
other activities that increase the number of response actions conducted
or overseen by a state or tribal response program. This funding is not
intended to supplant current state or tribal funding for their response
programs. Instead, it is to supplement their funding to increase their
response program's capacity.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional personnel will
be available to provide technical assistance to states and tribes as
they apply for and carry out section 128(a) cooperative agreements.
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional personnel will
be available to provide technical assistance to states and tribes as
they apply for and carry out Section 128(a) cooperative agreements.
III. Eligibility for Funding
To be eligible for funding under CERCLA section 128(a), a state or
tribe must:
1. Demonstrate that its response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements of a response program,
described in Section V of this guidance; or be a party to voluntary
response program Memorandum of Agreement (VRP MOA) \5\ with EPA;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ States or tribes that are parties to VRP MOAs and that
maintain and make available a public record are automatically
eligible for section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AND
2. Maintain and make available to the public a record of sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year, see CERCLA section
128(b)(1)(C).
IV. Matching Funds/Cost-Share
States and tribes are not required to provide matching funds for
cooperative agreements awarded under section 128(a), with the exception
of the section 128(a) funds a state or tribe uses to capitalize a
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
V. The Four Elements--Section 128(a)
Section 128(a) recipients that do not have a VRP MOA with EPA must
demonstrate that their response program includes, or is taking
reasonable steps to include, the four elements. Achievement of the four
elements should be viewed as a priority. Section 128(a) authorizes
funding for activities necessary to establish and enhance the four
elements, and to establish and maintain the public record requirement.
The four elements of a response program are described below:
1. Timely survey and inventory of brownfields sites in state or
tribal land. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
enable the state or tribe to establish or enhance a system or process
that will provide a reasonable estimate of the number, likely
locations, and the general characteristics of brownfields sites in
their state or tribal lands. EPA recognizes the varied scope of state
and tribal response programs and will not require states and tribes to
develop a ``list'' of brownfields sites. However, at a minimum, the
state or tribe should develop and/or maintain a system or process that
can provide a reasonable estimate of the number, likely location, and
general characteristics of brownfields sites within their state or
tribal lands. Inventories should evolve to a prioritization of sites
based on community needs, planning priorities, and protection of human
health and the environment.
Given funding limitations, EPA will negotiate work plans with
states and tribes to achieve this goal efficiently and effectively, and
within a realistic time frame. For example, many of EPA's Brownfields
Assessment cooperative agreement recipients conduct inventories of
brownfields sites in their communities or jurisdictions. EPA encourages
states and tribes to work with these cooperative agreement recipients
to obtain the information that they have gathered and include it in
their survey and inventory.
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities or other mechanisms and
resources. EPA's goal in funding activities under this element is to
have state and tribal response programs that include oversight and
enforcement authorities or other mechanisms, and resources that are
adequate to ensure that:
a. A response action will protect human health and the environment,
and be conducted in accordance with applicable laws; and
b. The state or tribe will complete the necessary response
activities if the person conducting the response activities fails to
complete the necessary response activities (this includes operation and
maintenance and/or long-term monitoring activities).
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide meaningful opportunities for
public participation. \6\ EPA's goal in funding activities under this
element is to have states and tribes include in their response program
mechanisms and resources for meaningful public participation, at the
local level, including, at a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ States and tribes establishing this element may find useful
information on public participation on EPA's community involvement
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/policies.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Public access to documents and related materials that a state,
tribe, or party conducting the cleanup is relying on or developing in
making cleanup decisions or conducting site activities;
b. Prior notice and opportunity for meaningful public comment on
cleanup plans and site activities including the input into the
prioritization of sites; and
c. A mechanism by which a person who is, or may be, affected by a
release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant at a brownfields site--located in the community in which
the person works or resides--may request that a site assessment be
conducted. The appropriate state or tribal official must consider this
request and appropriately respond.
4. Mechanisms for approval of a cleanup plan, and verification and
certification that cleanup is complete. EPA's goal in funding
activities under this element is to have states and tribes include in
their response program mechanisms to approve cleanup plans and to
verify that response actions are complete, including a requirement for
certification or similar documentation from the state, the tribe, or a
licensed site professional that the response action is complete.
Written approval by a state or tribal response program official of a
proposed cleanup plan is an example of an approval mechanism.
VI. Public Record Requirement
In order to be eligible for section 128(a) funding, states and
tribes (including those with MOAs) must establish and maintain a public
record system, described below, in order to receive funds.
Specifically, under section 128(b)(1)(C), states and tribes must:
1. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record of sites that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions have been completed during the previous
year;
2. Maintain and update, at least annually or more often as
appropriate, a record of sites that includes the name and location of
sites at which response actions are planned to be addressed in the next
year; and
3. Identify in the public record whether or not the site, upon
[[Page 73624]]
completion of the response action, will be suitable for unrestricted
use. If not, the public record must identify the institutional controls
relied on in the remedy and include relevant information concerning the
entity that will be responsible for oversight, monitoring, and/or
maintenance of the institutional and engineering controls.
Section 128(a) funds may be used to maintain and make available a
public record system that meets the requirements discussed above.
A. Distinguishing the ``Survey and Inventory'' Element From the
``Public Record''
It is important to note that the public record requirement differs
from the ``timely survey and inventory'' element described in the
``Four Elements'' section above. The public record addresses sites at
which response actions have been completed in the previous year and are
planned to be addressed in the upcoming year. In contrast, the ``timely
survey and inventory'' element, described above, refers to identifying
brownfields sites regardless of planned or completed actions there.
B. Making the Public Record Easily Accessible
EPA's goal is to enable states and tribes to make the public record
and other information, such as information from the ``survey and
inventory'' element, easily accessible. For this reason, EPA will allow
states and tribes to use section 128(a) funding to make the public
record, as well as other information, such as information from the
``survey and inventory'' element, available to the public via the
internet or other means. For example, the Agency would support funding
state and tribal efforts to include detailed location information in
the public record such as the street address, and latitude and
longitude information for each site.\7\ States and tribes should ensure
that all affected communities have appropriate access to the public
record including making it available on-line, in print at libraries, or
other community gathering places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For further information on latitude and longitude
information, please see EPA's data standards web site available at
https://iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/datastds/findadatastandard/epaapproved/latitudelongitude.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to reduce cooperative agreement reporting requirements
and increase public access to the public record, EPA encourages states
and tribes to place their public record on the internet. If a state or
tribe places the public record on the internet, maintains the
substantive requirements of the public record, and provides EPA with
the link to that site, EPA will, for purposes of cooperative agreement
funding only, deem the public record reporting requirement met.
C. Long-Term Maintenance of the Public Record
EPA encourages states and tribes to maintain public record
information, including data on institutional controls, on a long term
basis (more than one year) for sites at which a response action has
been completed. Subject to EPA regional office approval, states or
tribes may include development and operation of systems that ensure
long term maintenance of the public record, including information on
institutional controls, in their work plans.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ States and tribes may find useful information on
institutional controls on EPA's institutional controls web site at
https://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/ic/index.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Use of Funding
A. Overview
Section 128(a)(1)(B) describes the eligible uses of cooperative
agreement funds by states and tribes. In general, a state or tribe may
use a cooperative agreement to ``establish or enhance'' their response
programs, including elements of the response program that include
activities related to responses at brownfields sites with petroleum
contamination. Eligible activities include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Developing legislation, regulations, procedures,
ordinances, guidance, etc. that establish or enhance the administrative
and legal structure of their response programs;
Establishing and maintaining the required public record
described in Section VI of this guidance;
Maintaining and monitoring institutional controls;
Conducting site-specific activities, such as assessment or
cleanup, provided such activities establish and/or enhance the response
program and are tied to the four elements. In addition to the
requirement under CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) to provide for public
comment on cleanup plans and site activities, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and solicit input from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health
risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities
with limited experience working with government agencies. EPA will not
provide section 128(a) funds solely for assessment or cleanup of
specific brownfields sites; site-specific activities must be part of an
overall section 128(a) work plan that includes funding for other
activities that establish or enhance the four elements;
Capitalizing a revolving loan fund (RLF) for brownfields
cleanup under CERCLA section 104(k)(3). These RLFs are subject to the
same statutory requirements and cooperative agreement terms and
conditions applicable to RLFs awarded under section 104(k)(3).
Requirements include a 20 percent match (can be in the form of a
contribution of money, labor, material, or services from a non-federal
source) on the amount of section 128(a) funds used for the RLF, a
prohibition on using EPA cooperative agreement funds for administrative
costs relating to the RLF, and a prohibition on using RLF loans or
subgrants for response costs at a site for which the recipient may be
potentially liable under section 107 of CERCLA. Other prohibitions
contained in CERCLA section 104(k)(4) also apply; and
Purchasing environmental insurance or developing a risk-
sharing pool, indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide
financing for response actions under a state or tribal response
program.
B. Uses Related To ``Establishing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``establish'' includes activities
necessary to build the foundation for the four elements of a state or
tribal response program and the public record requirement. For example,
a state or tribal response program may use section 128(a) funds to
develop regulations, ordinances, procedures, and/or guidance. For more
developed state or tribal response programs, ``establish'' may also
include activities that keep their program at a level that meets the
four elements and maintains a public record required as a condition of
funding under CERCLA section 128(b)(1)(C).
C. Uses Related To ``Enhancing'' a State or Tribal Response Program
Under CERCLA section 128(a), ``enhance'' is related to activities
that add to or improve a state or tribal response program or increase
the number of sites at which response actions are conducted under a
state or tribal response program.
The exact ``enhancement'' uses that may be allowable depend upon
the
[[Page 73625]]
work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. For example, regional offices and states or tribes may agree
that section 128(a) funds may be used for outreach and training
directly related to increasing awareness of its response program, and
improving the skills of program staff. It may also include developing
better coordination and understanding of other state response programs,
e.g., RCRA or Underground Storage Tanks (USTs). As another example,
states and tribal response programs enhancement activities can include
outreach to local communities to increase their awareness and knowledge
regarding the importance of monitoring engineering and institutional
controls. Other ``enhancement'' uses may be allowable as well.
D. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities
1. Uses for Site-Specific Activities
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for site-specific
activities that improve state or tribal capacity. The amount grantees
may request for site-specific assessments and cleanups may not exceed
50% of the total amount of funding. A grantee may request a waiver to
exceed the 50% of annual funding for site specific activities. In order
for EPA to consider the waiver, the total amount of the request may not
exceed the grantee's prior year's funding level. The funding request
must include a brief justification describing the reason(s) for
spending more than 50% of an annual allocation on site-specific
activities. An applicant must include the following information in the
written justification:
What site specific activities will be covered by this
funding? If known, provide site specific information and describe the
development or enhancement of your state/tribal site specific program.
Further explain how the community will be (or has been) involved in
prioritization of site work and especially those sites where there is a
potential or known significant environmental impact to the community;
How will the core programmatic capacity (i.e., the four
elements of a response program) and related activities be maintained in
spite of an increase in site-specific work? Grantees must demonstrate
that they have adequate funding from other sources to effectively carry
out work on the four elements for EPA to grant a waiver of the 50%
limit on using 128(a) funds for site-specific activities;
Describe how this shift in funding towards site-specific
work is more appropriate for your response program rather than a
request for an increase in overall funding; and
Are the sites to be addressed those which the affected
community(ies) has requested an assessment (refer to Overview of
Funding section of this notice for more information)? Please explain.
EPA Headquarters will determine approval of waivers on the
information that is included in the justification along with the
request for funding, as well as other information available to the
Agency. EPA's Regional Brownfield Coordinators will inform grantees of
the Agency's final decision(s).
2. Uses Related to Site-Specific Assessment and Cleanup Activities
Site-specific assessment and cleanup activities should establish
and/or enhance the response program and be tied to the four elements.
Site-specific assessments and cleanups must comply with all applicable
laws and are subject to the following restrictions:
a. Section 128(a) funds can only be used for assessments or
cleanups at sites that meet the definition of a brownfields site at
CERCLA section 101(39). EPA encourages states and tribes to use site-
specific funding to perform assessment (e.g., phase II and phase III
assessments) and cleanup activities that will lead more quickly to the
reuse of sites;
b. Absent EPA approval, no more than $200,000 per site assessment
can be funded with section 128(a) funds, and no more than $200,000 per
site cleanup can be funded with section 128(a) funds;
c. Absent EPA approval, the state/tribe may not use funds awarded
under this agreement to assess and clean up sites owned or operated by
the recipient; and
d. Assessments and cleanups cannot be conducted at sites where the
state/tribe is a potentially responsible party pursuant to CERCLA
section 107, except:
At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled
substance as defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
When the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set
forth in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
Subgrants cannot be provided to entities that may be potentially
responsible parties (pursuant to CERCLA section 107) at the site for
which the assessment or cleanup activities are proposed to be
conducted, except:
1. At brownfields sites contaminated by a controlled substance as
defined in CERCLA section 101(39)(D)(ii)(I); or
2. when the recipient would satisfy all of the elements set forth
in CERCLA section 101(40) to qualify as a bona fide prospective
purchaser except that the date of acquisition of the property was on or
before January 11, 2002.
3. Uses Related to Site-Specific Activities at Petroleum Brownfields
Sites
States and tribes may use section 128(a) funds for activities that
establish and enhance their response programs, even if their response
programs address petroleum contamination. Also, the costs of site-
specific activities, such as site assessments or cleanup at petroleum
contaminated brownfields sites, defined at CERCLA section
101(39)(D)(ii)(II), are eligible and are allowable if the activity is
included in the work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office
and the state or tribe. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize a
Brownfields RLF may be used at brownfields sites contaminated by
petroleum to the extent allowed under CERCLA section 104(k)(3).
4. Other Eligible Uses of Funding
Other eligible uses of funds for site-specific related include, but
are not limited to, the following activities:
Technical assistance to federal brownfields cooperative
agreement recipients;
Development and/or review of quality assurance project
plans (QAPPs); and
Preparation and submission of Property Profile Forms and/
or entering data into the ACRES database
E. Uses Related to Activities at ``Non-Brownfields'' Sites
Costs incurred for activities at non-brownfields sites, e.g.,
oversight, may be eligible and allowable if such activities are
included in the state's or tribe's work plan. These costs need not be
incurred in connection with a brownfields site to be eligible, but must
be authorized under the state's or tribe's work plan to be allowable.
Other uses may be eligible and allowable as well, depending upon the
work plan negotiated between the EPA regional office and the state or
tribe. However, assessment and cleanup activities may only be conducted
on eligible brownfields sites, as defined in CERCLA section 101(39).
[[Page 73626]]
VIII. General Programmatic Guidelines For 128(a) Grant Funding Requests
Funding authorized under CERCLA section 128(a) is awarded through a
cooperative agreement \9\ with a state or tribe. The program is
administered under the general EPA grant and cooperative agreement
regulations for states, tribes, and local governments found in the Code
of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR Part 31 as well as applicable
provisions of 40 CFR part 35 Subparts A and B. Under these regulations,
the cooperative agreement recipient for section 128(a) grant program is
the government to which a cooperative agreement is awarded and which is
accountable for the use of the funds provided. The cooperative
agreement recipient is the entire legal entity even if only a
particular component of the entity is designated in the cooperative
agreement award document. Further, unexpended balances of cooperative
agreement funds are subject to 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518 to the
extent consistent with this guidance. EPA allocates funds to state and
tribal response programs under 40 CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ A cooperative agreement is an agreement to a state/tribe
that includes substantial involvement by EPA on activities described
in the work plan which may include technical assistance,
collaboration on program priorities, etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. One Application per State or Tribe
Subject to the availability of funds, EPA regional offices will
negotiate and enter into section 128(a) cooperative agreements with
eligible and interested states or tribes. EPA will accept only one
application from each eligible state or tribe.
B. Define the State or Tribal Response Program
States and tribes must define in their work plan the ``section
128(a) response program(s)'' to which the funds will be applied, and
may designate a component of the state or tribe that will be EPA's
primary point of contact for negotiations on their proposed work plan.
When EPA funds the section 128(a) cooperative agreement, states and
tribes may distribute these funds among the appropriate state and
tribal agencies that are part of the section 128(a) response program.
This distribution must be clearly outlined in their annual work plan.
C. Separate Cooperative Agreements for the Capitalization of RLFs Using
Section 128(a) Funds
If a portion of the section 128(a) grant funds requested will be
used to capitalize a revolving loan fund for cleanup, pursuant to
section 104(k)(3), two separate cooperative agreements must be awarded,
i.e., one for the RLF and one for non-RLF uses. States and tribes may,
however, submit one initial request for funding, delineating the RLF as
a proposed use. Section 128(a) funds used to capitalize an RLF are not
eligible for inclusion into a Performance Partnership Grant (PPG).
D. Authority To Manage a Revolving Loan Fund Program
If a state or tribe chooses to use its section 128(a) funds to
capitalize a revolving loan fund program, the state or tribe must have
the authority to manage the program, e.g., issue loans. If the agency/
department listed as the point of contact for the section 128(a)
cooperative agreement does not have this authority, it must be able to
demonstrate that another state or tribal agency does have the authority
to manage the RLF and is willing to do so.
E. Section 128(A) Cooperative Agreements Can Be Part of a Performance
Partnership Grant (PPG)
States and tribes may include section 128(a) cooperative agreements
in their PPG 69 FR 51,756 (2004). Section 128(a) funds used to
capitalize an RLF or purchase insurance or develop a risk sharing pool,
an indemnity pool, or insurance mechanism to provide financing for
response actions under a state or tribal response program are not
eligible for inclusion in the PPG.
F. Project Period
EPA regional offices will determine the project period for each
cooperative agreement. These may be for multiple years depending on the
regional office's cooperative agreement policies. Each cooperative
agreement must have an annual budget period tied to an annual work
plan. Pre-award costs are subject to 40 CFR 35.113 and 40 CFR 35.513.
G. Demonstrating the Four Elements
As part of the annual work plan negotiation process, states or
tribes that do not have VRP MOAs must demonstrate that their program
includes, or is taking reasonable steps to include, the four elements
described in Section V. EPA will not fund, in future years, state or
tribal response program annual work plans if EPA determines that these
requirements are not met or reasonable progress is not being made. EPA
may base this determination on the information the state or tribe
provides to support its work plan, or on EPA's review of the state or
tribal response program.
H. Establishing and Maintaining the Public Record
Prior to funding a state's or tribe's annual work plan, EPA
regional offices will verify and document that a public record, as
described in Section VI and below, exists and is being maintained.\10\
Specifically:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For purposes of cooperative agreement funding, the state's
or tribe's public record applies to that state's or tribe's response
program(s) that utilized the section 128(a) funding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States or tribes that received initial funding prior to
FY11: Requests for FY12 funds will not be accepted from states or
tribes that fail to demonstrate, by the January 31, 2012, request
deadline, that they established and are maintaining a public record.
(Note, this would potentially impact any state or tribe that had a term
and condition placed on their FY11 cooperative agreement that
prohibited drawdown of FY11 funds prior to meeting public record
requirement). States or tribes in this situation will not be prevented
from drawing down their prior year funds, once the public record
requirement is met, but will be restricted from applying for FY12
funding; and
States or Tribes that received initial funding in FY11: By
the time of the actual FY12 award, the state or tribe must demonstrate
that they established and maintained the public record (those states
and tribes that do not meet this requirement will have a term and
condition placed on their FY12 cooperative agreement that prevents the
drawdown of FY12 funds until the public record requirement is met).
I. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
States and tribes should be aware that EPA and its Congressional
appropriations committees are concerned regarding the amount of
unexpended balances of STAG categorical grants. During the allocation
process, EPA headquarters places significant emphasis on the
utilization of prior years' funding. Unused funds from prior years will
be considered in the allocation process. Existing balances of
cooperative agreement funds as reflected in EPA's Financial Data
Warehouse could support an allocation amount below a grantee's request
for funding or, if appropriate, deobligation and reallocation by EPA
Regions as provided for in 40 CFR 35.118 and 40 CFR 35.518. Grantees
should include a detailed explanation and justification of funds that
remain in EPA's Financial Data Warehouse from prior years (that are
related to response program
[[Page 73627]]
activities or brownfield related activities).
EPA Regional staff will review EPA's Financial Database Warehouse
to identify the amount of remaining prior year(s) funds. The
cooperative agreement recipient should work, as early as possible, with
both their own finance department, and with their Regional Project
Officer to reconcile any discrepancy between the amount of unspent
funds showing in EPA's system, and the amount reflected in the
recipient's records. The recipient should obtain concurrence from the
Region on the amount of unspent funds requiring justification by the
deadline for this request for funding.
J. Optional: Explanation of Overall Program Impacts of Possible Funding
Reductions
Please describe the effects, if any, of a 10% and 20% reduction in
your current funding amount on significant activities of your response
program. Specifically, where would the decrease in funding be realized
(e.g. reduction in staff, decrease in oversight activities, or other
impacts to the environment and health of the communities the program
serves, etc.) in your program?
K. Allocation System and Process for Distribution of Funds
EPA regional offices will work with interested states and tribes to
develop their preliminary work plans and funding requests. Final
cooperative agreement work plans and budgets will be negotiated with
the regional office once final allocation determinations are made.
Please refer to process flow chart below:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29NO11.038
For Fiscal Year 2012, EPA will consider funding requests up to a
maximum of $1.2 million per state or tribe. Please note the CERCLA
128(a) annual program's budget has remained static while demand for
funding continues to increase every year.\11\ Therefore, it is likely
that the FY12 state and tribal individual funding amounts will be less
than the FY11 individual funding amounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ FY11 EPA received $64.9 Million in requests for funding
from States and Tribes under CERCLA 128(a). The FY11 enacted budget
was $49.5 Million. The resulting budget shortfall was approximately
$ 15.4 Million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the January 31, 2012, request deadline, EPA's Regional
Offices will submit summaries of state and tribal requests to EPA
Headquarters. Before submitting requests to EPA Headquarters, Regional
Offices may take into account additional factors when determining
recommended allocation amounts. Such factors include, but are not
limited to, the depth and breadth of the state or tribal program; scope
of the perceived need for the funding, e.g., size of state or tribal
jurisdiction or the proposed work plan balanced against capacity of the
program, amount of current year funding, funds remaining from prior
years, etc.
After receipt of the regional recommendations, EPA Headquarters
will consolidate requests and allocate funds accordingly.
In FY13 the maximum amount that EPA will consider for a funding
request will likely decrease at a rate up to 30% a year, and could
decrease at a greater rate depending on enacted Congressional budget
amounts and demand for funding.
IX. Information to be Submitted With the Funding Request
A. Demonstration of Significant Utilization of Prior Years' Funding
States and tribes requesting section 128(a) FY12 funds must submit
the following information, as applicable, to their regional brownfield
contact on or before January 31, 2012. If a grantee wishes to avoid an
allocation reduction, when submitting a request for FY12 funds, include
a detailed explanation and justification of funds that remain in EPA's
financial Data Warehouse from prior years (that are related to response
program activities or brownfield related activities).
For those states and tribes that received FY10 or prior section
128(a) funds, you must provide the amount of prior years' funding
including FY10 funds that recipients have not received in payments
(i.e., funds EPA has obligated for grants that remain in EPA's
Financial Data Warehouse). EPA will take into account these funds in
the allocation process when determining the recipient's programmatic
needs under 40 CFR 35.420 and 40 CFR 35.737.
B. Summary of Planned Use of FY12 Funding
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY11 FY12 Summary of intended use (example
Funding use Awarded Requested uses)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All states and tribes requesting FY12 funds $XX,XXX $XX,XXX
must submit a summary of the planned use of
the funds with associated dollar amounts.
Please provide the request in the following:
Establish or enhance the four elements:
1. Timely survey and inventory of ........... ........... 1. Examples:
brownfields sites. Inventory and prioritize
brownfields sites.
[[Page 73628]]
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities ........... ........... 2. Examples:
or other mechanisms. Develop/enhance ordinances,
regulations, procedures for response
programs.
3. Mechanisms and resources to provide ........... ........... 3. Examples:
meaningful opportunities for public Develop a community
participation. involvement process.
Fund an outreach coordinator.
Issue public notices of site
activities.
Develop a process to seek
public input from local communities,
especially potential environmental
justice communities, communities with
a health risk related to exposure to
hazardous waste or other public
health concerns, economically
disadvantaged or remote areas, and
communities with limited experience
working with government agencies to
prioritize sites to be addressed.
4. Mechanisms or approval of a cleanup ........... ........... 4. Examples:
plan and verification and certification Review cleanup plans and
that cleanup is complete. verify completed actions.
Establish and maintain the public record...... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Maintain public record.
Create web site for public
record.
Disseminate public
information on how to access the
public record.
Enhance the response program.................. $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Provide oversight of site
assessments and cleanups.
Attend training and
conferences on brownfields cleanup
technologies & Other brownfields
topics.
Update and enhance program
management activities.
Negotiate/oversee contracts
for response programs.
Enhance program management &
tracking systems.
Site-specific activities (amount requested $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Perform site assessments
should be incidental to the workplan, see and cleanups.
Section VII.D for more information on what Develop QAPPs.
activities should be considered when Prepare Property Profile
calculating site specific activities). Forms/input data into ACRES database
for these sites.
Environmental insurance....................... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Review potential uses of
environmental insurance.
Manage an insurance risk
pool.
Revolving loan fund........................... $XX,XXX $XX,XXX Create a cleanup revolving
loan fund.
Total funding......................... $XXX,XXX $XXX,XXX Performance Partnership Grant? Yes
[squ] No [squ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X. Terms and Reporting
Cooperative agreements for state and tribal response programs will
include programmatic and administrative terms and conditions. These
terms and conditions will describe EPA's substantial involvement
including technical assistance and collaboration on program development
and site-specific activities. Each of the subsections below summarizes
the basic terms and conditions, and related reporting that will be
required if a cooperative agreement with EPA is awarded.
A. Progress Reports
In accordance with 40 CFR 31.40, state and tribes must provide
progress reports as provided in the terms and conditions of the
cooperative agreement negotiated with EPA regional offices. State and
tribal costs for complying with reporting requirements are an eligible
expense under the section 128(a) cooperative agreement. As a minimum,
state or tribal progress reports must include both a narrative
discussion and performance data relating to the state's or tribe's
accomplishments and environmental outputs associated with the approved
budget and workplan, and should provide an accounting of section 128(a)
funding. If applicable, the state or tribe must include information on
activities related to establishing or enhancing the four elements of
the state's or tribe's response program. All recipients must provide
information relating to establishing or, if already established,
maintaining the public record. Depending upon the activities included
in the state's or tribe's work plan, an EPA regional office may request
that a progress report include:
1. Reporting environmental insurance. Recipients with work plans
that include funding for environmental insurance must report:
Number and description of insurance policies purchased
(e.g., type of coverage provided; dollar limits of coverage; any
buffers or deductibles; category and identity of insured persons;
premium; first dollar or umbrella; site specific or blanket; occurrence
or claims made, etc.);
The number of sites covered by the insurance;
The amount of funds spent on environmental insurance
(e.g., amount dedicated to insurance program, or to insurance
premiums); and
The amount of claims paid by insurers to policy holders.
2. Reporting for site-specific assessment or cleanup activities.
Recipients with work plans that include funding for brownfields site
assessment or cleanup must input information required by the OMB-
approved Property Profile Form into the Assessment Cleanup and
Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) database for each site assessment
and cleanup. In addition, recipients must report how they provide the
affected community with prior notice and opportunity for meaningful
participation as per CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(C)(ii) on proposed
cleanup plans and site activities. For example, EPA strongly encourages
states and tribes to seek public input regarding the priority of sites
to be addressed and solicit input from local communities, especially
potential environmental justice communities, communities with a health
risk related to exposure to hazardous waste or other public health
concerns, economically disadvantaged or remote areas, and communities
with
[[Page 73629]]
limited experience working with government agencies.
3. Reporting for other site-specific activities. Recipients with
work plans that include funding for other site-specific related
activities must include a description of the site-specific activities
and the number of sites at which the activity was conducted. For
example:
Number and frequency of oversight audits of licensed site
professional certified cleanups;
Number and frequency of state/tribal oversight audits
conducted;
Number of sites where staff conducted audits, provided
technical assistance, or conducted other oversight activities; and
Number of staff conducting oversight audits, providing
technical assistance, or conducting other oversight activities.
4. Reporting for RLF uses. Recipients with work plans that include
funding for revolving loan fund (RLF) must include the information
required by the terms and conditions for progress reporting under
CERCLA section 104(k)(3) RLF cooperative agreements.
5. Reporting for Non-MOA states and tribes. All recipients without
a VRP MOA must report activities related to establishing or enhancing
the four elements of the state's or tribe's response program. For each
element state/tribes must report how they are maintaining the element
or how they are taking reasonable steps to establish or enhance the
element as negotiated in individual state/tribal work plans. For
example, pursuant to CERCLA section 128(a)(2)(B), reports on the
oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms element may include:
A narrative description and copies of applicable documents
developed or under development to enable the response program to
conduct enforcement and oversight at sites. For example:
[cir] Legal authorities and mechanisms (e.g., statutes,
regulations, orders, agreements); and
[cir] Policies and procedures to implement legal authorities; and
other mechanisms;
A description of the resources and staff allocated/to be
allocated to the response program to conduct oversight and enforcement
at sites as a result of the cooperative agreement;
A narrative description of how these authorities or other
mechanisms, and resources, are adequate to ensure that:
[cir] A response action will protect human health and the
environment; and be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and
state law; and if the person conducting the response action fails to
complete the necessary response activities, including operation and
maintenance or long-term monitoring activities, the necessary response
activities are completed; and
A narrative description and copy of appropriate documents
demonstrating the exercise of oversight and enforcement authorities by
the response program at a brownfields site.
The regional offices may also request other information be added to
the progress reports, as appropriate, to properly document activities
described by the cooperative agreement work plan.
EPA regions may allow states or tribes to provide performance data
in appropriate electronic format.
The regional offices will forward progress reports to EPA
Headquarters, if requested. This information may be used to develop
national reports on the outcomes of CERCLA section 128(a) funding to
states and tribes.
B. Reporting of Program Activity Levels
States and tribes must report, by January 31, 2012, a summary of
the previous federal fiscal year's work (October 1, 2010 through
September 30, 2011). The following information must be submitted to
your regional project officer:
Category(ies) of properties (or sites) that CERCLA 128(a)
funds are used for capacity building and/or site-specific activities:
--Brownfields
--Underground Storage Tanks/Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
--Federal Facilities
--Solid Waste
--Superfund
--Hazardous Waste Facilities
--VCP (Voluntary Cleanup Program, Independent Cleanup Program, etc.)
--Other----------
Number of properties (or sites) enrolled in a response
program during FY11;
Number of properties (or sites) where documentation
indicates that cleanup work is complete and all required institutional
controls (IC's) are in place, or not required;
Total number of acres associated with properties (or
sites) in the previous bullet; and
Number of properties where assistance was provided, but
the property was not enrolled in the response program (OPTIONAL).
Where applicable, EPA may require states/tribes to report specific
performance measures related to the four elements which can be
aggregated for national reporting to Congress.
For example:
1. Timely survey and inventory--estimated number of brownfields
sites in the state or on tribal land;
2. Oversight and enforcement authorities/mechanisms--number of
active cleanups and percentage that received oversight; percentage of
active cleanups not in compliance with the cleanup workplan and that
received communications from recipient regarding non-compliance;
3. Public participation--percentage of sites in the response
program where public meetings/notices were conducted regarding the
cleanup plan and/or other site activities; number of requests and
responses to site assessment requests; and
4. Cleanup approval/certification mechanisms--total number of ``no
further action'' letters or total number of certificate of completions.
Note: Where applicable, this reporting requirement may include
activities not funded with CERCLA section 128(a) monies, because
this information may be used by EPA to evaluate whether recipients
without MOAs have met or are taking reasonable steps to meet the
four elements of a response program pursuant to CERCLA section
128(a)(2).
C. Reporting of Public Record
All recipients must report, as specified in the terms and
conditions of their cooperative agreement, information related to
establishing or, if already established, maintaining the public record,
described above. States and tribes can refer to an already existing
public record, e.g., Web site or other public database to meet the
public record requirement. Recipients reporting may only be required to
demonstrate that the public record a) exists and is up-to-date, and b)
is adequate. A public record may include the following information:
A list of sites at which response actions have been completed
including:
Date the response action was completed;
Site name;
Name of owner at time of cleanup, if known;
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
Whether an institutional control is in place;
Type of institutional control in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries of
contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
Nature of the contamination at the site (e.g., hazardous
substances, contaminants or pollutants, petroleum contamination, etc.);
and
Size of the site in acres.
[[Page 73630]]
A list of sites planned to be addressed by the state or tribal
response program including:
Site name and the name of owner at time of cleanup, if
known;
Location of the site (street address, and latitude and
longitude);
To the extent known, whether an institutional control is
in place;
Type of the institutional control in place (e.g., deed
restriction, zoning restriction, local ordinance, state registries of
contaminated property, deed notices, advisories, etc.);
To the extent known, the nature of the contamination at
the site (e.g., hazardous substances, contaminants, or pollutants,
petroleum contamination, etc.); and
Size of the site in acres
D. Award Administration Information
1. Subaward and Executive Compensation Reporting
Applicants must ensure that they have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the subaward and executive total
compensation reporting requirements established under OMB guidance at 2
CFR Part 170, unless they qualify for an exception from the
requirements, should they be selected for funding.
2. Central Contractor Registration (CCR) and Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Requirements
Unless exempt from these requirements under OMB guidance at 2 CFR
Part 25 (e.g., individuals), applicants must:
A. Register in the CCR prior to submitting an application or
proposal under this announcement. CCR information can be found at
https://www.bpn.gov/ccr/;
B. Maintain an active CCR registration with current information at
all times during which it has an active federal award or an application
or proposal under consideration by an agency, and
C. Provide its DUNS number in each application or proposal it
submits to the agency. Applicants can receive a DUNS number, at no
cost, by visiting the D&B Web site at: https://iupdate.dnb.com/iUpdate/companylookup.htm.
Failure to comply with these requirements will affect the
applicant's ability to receive any funding.
3. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award under this announcement is
expected to manage assistance agreement funds efficiently and
effectively, and make sufficient progress towards completing the
project activities described in the work-plan in a timely manner. The
assistance agreement will include terms/conditions implementing this
requirement.
Regional State and Tribal Brownfields Contacts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region State Tribal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 James Byrne, 5 AmyJean McKeown, 5
CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT.......... Post Office Post Office
Square, Suite 100 Square, Suite 100
(OSRR07-2), (OSRR07-2),
Boston, MA 02109- Boston, MA 02109-
3912, Phone (617) 3912, Phone (617)
918-1389 Fax 918-1248 Fax
(617) 918-1291. (617) 918-1291.
2 John Struble, 290 John Struble, 290
NJ, NY, PR, VI.................. Broadway, 18th Broadway, 18th
Floor, New York, Floor, New York,
NY 10007, Phone NY 10007, Phone
(212) 637-4291 (212) 637-4291
Fax (212) 637- Fax (212) 637-
4211. 4211.
3 Janice Bartel,
DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV.......... 1650 Arch Street
(3HS51),
Philadelphia, PA
19103, Phone
(215) 814-5394
Fax (215) 814-
3274.
4 Nicole Comick- Cindy J. Nolan, 61
AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN.. Bates, 61 Forsyth Forsyth Street
Street SW., 10TH SW., 10TH FL
FL (9T25), (9T25), Atlanta,
Atlanta, GA 30303- GA 30303-8909,
8909, Phone (404) Phone (404) 562-
562-9966 Fax 8425 Fax (404)
(404) 562-8788. 562-8788.
5 Jan Pels, 77 West Jane Neumann, 77
IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI.......... Jackson Boulevard West Jackson
(SE-7J), Chicago, Boulevard (SE-
IL 60604-3507, 7J), Chicago, IL
Phone (312) 886- 60604-3507, Phone
3009 Fax (312) (312) 353-0123
692-2161. Fax (312) 697-
2649.
6 Amber Perry, 1445 Amber Perry, 1445
AR, LA, NM, OK, TX.............. Ross Avenue, Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200 (6SF), Suite 1200 (6SF),
Dallas, TX 75202- Dallas, TX 75202-
2733, Phone (214) 2733, Phone (214)
665-3172 Fax 665-3172 Fax
(214) 665-6660. (214) 665-6660.
7 Susan Klein, 901 Susan Klein, 901
IA, KS, MO, NE.................. N. 5th Street N. 5th Street
(SUPRSTAR), (SUPR