Cameron LNG, LLC; Notice of Application, 73609-73610 [2011-30691]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
a. How do lessons learned from events
analysis get disseminated to industry?
b. How do NERC’s non-standards
processes such as the Industry Alerts,
Recommendations, Event Analysis,
Essential Actions, Lessons Learned and
Compliance Application Notices
interact with the reliability standards?
To what extent do these processes aid
in identifying important reliability
matters that are not addressed under the
existing Reliability Standards?
c. Is the alerts process getting the
message out on issues of immediate
importance
d. How do you gauge whether
industry is appropriately implementing
NERC alerts or lessons learned from an
event analysis?
e. Is there a feedback loop into the
Reliability Standards development
process to determine if there is a gap in
the standards? If so, how has that been
working? If not, should there be?
Panelists
• Gerry W. Cauley, President and
Chief Executive Officer, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
• Thomas J. Galloway, President and
Chief Executive Officer, North American
Transmission Forum
• Tom Burgess, Executive Director,
Integrated System Planning and
Development, FirstEnergy, on behalf of
FirstEnergy and EEI
• Scott Helyer, Vice President,
Transmission at Tenaska, on behalf of
Electric Power Supply Association
(EPSA)
• Mary Kipp, Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Chief Compliance
Officer, El Paso Electric
Commissioner Closing Comments
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
November 30, 2011
9 a.m. Commissioners’ Opening
Remarks
9:20 a.m. Introductions Commissioner
Cheryl LaFleur, Chair
9: 30 Remarks: Janet McCabe,
Principal Deputy Assistant
Administrator for Air and
Radiation, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency
9:40 a.m. Panel III: Presentations and
Discussion on the Current State of
Processes for Identifying UnitSpecific Local or Regional
Reliability Issues in Response to
Final EPA Regulations
Presentations: Panelists will be asked
to describe their local and regional
processes for identifying unit-specific
reliability issues in response to final
EPA environmental requirements.
Panelists should address the following
broad questions in their presentations:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
a. How should reliability aspects of
EPA’s proposed and final regulations be
addressed? What local or regional
processes are used to plan for emerging
issues such as the EPA regulations?
How are you incorporating the EPA
regulations into this process?
b. What have you proposed to the
EPA regarding an exemption process?
Do you support the exemption process
changes identified by the RTOs or other
entities in comments to the EPA? Do
you have any alternative proposals?
c. What market structures and tariff
rules are used to address local and
regional reliability issues that may arise
from generation retirements potentially
triggered by EPA regulations? Are any
changes to market and tariff rules
needed?
d. Do you have the right tools to
identify any problems that may arise?
Are there other process changes that
could help address reliability-related
requests for exemptions from the EPA
regulations?
Panelists
• Mark Lauby, Vice President and
Director of Reliability Assessment and
Performance Analysis, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation
• Michael Kormos, Senior Vice
President of Operations, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
• Carl Monroe, Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer,
Southwest Power Pool (SPP)
• Thomas F. Farrell II, Chairman,
President & CEO—Dominion, on behalf
of EEI
• Kathleen Barron, Vice President,
Federal Regulatory Affairs and Policy,
Exelon Corporation
• Anthony Topazi, Chief Operating
Officer, Southern Company
• David Wright, Vice Chairman,
South Carolina Public Service
Commission
• Joshua Epel, Chairman, Colorado
Public Utilities Commission
12 p.m. Lunch
12:45 p.m. Continuation of Panel III
Discussion with Commissioners: Open
dialogue and questions and answers
between Panel 1 and Commissioners.
2:15 p.m. Break
2:30 p.m. Panel IV: Discussion on
multi-jurisdictional processes.
Presentations: Panelists will be asked
to describe how they coordinate
processes such as the state integrated
resource planning with their reliability
planning and the safety valve proposal.
Panelists should address the following
broad questions in their presentations:
a. What, if any role should the
Commission or DOE play in studying
replacement generation or other
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73609
reliability solutions due to retirements?
What role does the retail regulator, such
as a state public utility commission or
municipal authority play in forming
your bulk power system reliability
plans?
b. Do you support the exemption
process changes identified by the RTOs
or other entities in comments to the
EPA? What role can the Commission
play in evaluating individual requests
under a safety-valve approach? Do you
have any alternative proposals?
Panelists
• Patricia A. Hoffman, Assistant
Secretary for Electricity & Infrastructure
Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy
• Gerry W. Cauley, President and
Chief Executive Officer, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
• Nick Akins, CEO of American
Electric Power (AEP), on behalf of AEP
• Clair J. Moeller, Vice President
Transmission Asset Management,
Midwest Independent Transmission
System Operator, Inc. (MISO)
• Betty Ann Kane, Chairman, District
of Columbia Public Service Commission
• Cheryl Roberto, Commissioner,
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
• Eric Baker, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Wolverine Electric
Power Cooperative
• Debra Raggio, Vice President,
Government and Regulatory Affairs,
Assistant General Counsel, GenOn
Energy, Inc.
Commissioner Closing Comments
[FR Doc. 2011–30671 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. CP12–15–000]
Cameron LNG, LLC; Notice of
Application
Take notice that on November 4,
2010, Cameron LNG, LLC (Cameron),
101 Ash Street, San Diego, California
92101, filed in Docket No. CP12–15–
000, an application pursuant to section
3(a) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for
authority to construct and operate a
boil-off gas (BOG) liquefaction system at
its LNG import terminal in Cameron
Parish, Louisiana. Specifically, Cameron
proposes to install facilities consisting
of a closed loop refrigeration system at
the terminal to liquefy BOG and return
such gas in the form of LNG to its
storage tanks. Cameron states that the
project will not require any new LNG
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73610
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
storage facilities and that any new LNG
piping will be very limited, all as more
fully set forth in the application which
is on file with the Commission and open
to public inspection. This filing may
also be viewed on the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.ferc.gov using
the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits,
in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, call (202)
502–8659 or TTY, (202) 208–3676.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to
William D. Rapp, 101 Ash Street, San
Diego, CA 92101, phone (619) 699–5050
or email: wrapp@sempraglobal.com.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the
Commission staff will either: complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff’s issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
or EA for this proposal. The filing of the
EA in the Commission’s public record
for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and
the subsequent need to complete all
Federal authorizations within 90 days of
the date of issuance of the Commission
staff’s FEIS or EA.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the below listed
comment date, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
14 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy to
the applicant and to every other party in
the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commenters
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
Motions to intervene, protests and
comments may be filed electronically
via the internet in lieu of paper; see, 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s Web
site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. The
Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
Comment Date: December 12, 2011.
Dated: November 21, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–30691 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC12–33–000.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Applicants: Ridgeline Alternative
Energy, LLC.
Description: Joint Application of
Ridgeline Alternative Energy, LLC;
Rockland Wind Farm LLC; and Atlantic
Power Corporation.
Filed Date: 11/17/11.
Accession Number: 20111117–5164.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/8/11.
Docket Numbers: EC12–34–000.
Applicants: Bishop Hill Energy LLC.
Description: Application for
Authorization under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act and Request for
Waivers and Expedited Action of
Bishop Hill Energy LLC.
Filed Date: 11/18/11.
Accession Number: 20111118–5093.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/9/11.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER11–3876–003;
ER11–2044–004; ER10–2611–002.
Applicants: MidAmerican Energy
Company, Cordova Energy Company
LLC, Saranac Power Partners, L.P.
Description: Triennial market update
for Central Region of MidAmerican
Energy Company, et al.
Filed Date: 11/17/11.
Accession Number: 20111117–5170.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/8/11.
Docket Numbers: ER12–430–000.
Applicants: Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.
Description: Revisions to Attachment
AE—Review and Assessment of
Resource Plans to be effective 1/17/
2012.
Filed Date: 11/17/11.
Accession Number: 20111117–5128.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/8/11.
Docket Numbers: ER12–431–000.
Applicants: NedPower Mount Storm,
LLC.
Description: Compliance Filing—
Section X and XI to be effective 11/17/
2011.
Filed Date: 11/17/11.
Accession Number: 20111117–5160.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/8/11.
Docket Numbers: ER12–432–000.
Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
Description: Vantage Wind LGIA to be
effective 10/1/2011.
Filed Date: 11/17/11.
Accession Number: 20111117–5161.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/8/11.
Docket Numbers: ER12–433–000.
Applicants: Energy Exchange Direct,
LLC.
Description: Energy Exchange Direct,
LLC Electric Tariff Original Volume No
1 to be effective 12/1/2011.
Filed Date: 11/18/11.
Accession Number: 20111118–5000.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73609-73610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30691]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. CP12-15-000]
Cameron LNG, LLC; Notice of Application
Take notice that on November 4, 2010, Cameron LNG, LLC (Cameron),
101 Ash Street, San Diego, California 92101, filed in Docket No. CP12-
15-000, an application pursuant to section 3(a) of the Natural Gas Act
(NGA) for authority to construct and operate a boil-off gas (BOG)
liquefaction system at its LNG import terminal in Cameron Parish,
Louisiana. Specifically, Cameron proposes to install facilities
consisting of a closed loop refrigeration system at the terminal to
liquefy BOG and return such gas in the form of LNG to its storage
tanks. Cameron states that the project will not require any new LNG
[[Page 73610]]
storage facilities and that any new LNG piping will be very limited,
all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with
the Commission and open to public inspection. This filing may also be
viewed on the Commission's Web site at https://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call (202) 502-8659 or TTY, (202) 208-3676.
Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
William D. Rapp, 101 Ash Street, San Diego, CA 92101, phone (619) 699-
5050 or email: wrapp@sempraglobal.com.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all Federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the below listed comment date, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
Comment Date: December 12, 2011.
Dated: November 21, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-30691 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P