Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Community Eligibility Option Evaluation, 73582-73584 [2011-30667]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
73582
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 229
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Community
Eligibility Option Evaluation
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This collection is a new information
collection for the Community Eligibility
Option Evaluation.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by January 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Comments may
be sent to: John Endahl, Senior Program
Analyst, Office of Research and
Analysis, Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
1004, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments
may also be submitted via fax to the
attention of John Endahl at (703) 305–
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
2576 or via email to
john.endahl@fns.usda.gov. Comments
will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans, contact John
Endahl, Senior Program Analyst, Office
of Research and Analysis, Food and
Nutrition Service/USDA, 3101 Park
Center Drive, Room 1004, Alexandria,
VA 22302; Fax: (703) 305–2576; Email:
john.endahl@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Community Eligibility Option
Evaluation.
OMB Number: 0584–NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not yet
determined.
Type of Information Collection
Request: New information collection.
Abstract: Section 104(a) of the
Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act (the Act)
of 2010 provides the Community
Eligibility Option (the CE Option) for
Local Educational Authorities (LEAs)
and schools, as an alternative to
household applications for Free or
Reduced Price meals. Under the CE
Option, families are not required to
submit applications for free or reducedprice meals, and schools are required to
provide free meals to all students. The
Act sets a reimbursement formula based
on the percentage of students directly
certified or otherwise approved without
application (the Identified Student
Percentage or ISP). The potential
benefits are that more students
participate, meals are more nutritious,
and LEAs may experience reductions in
administrative burden and errors. In
order to understand how the CE Option
is implemented, incentives and barriers
for LEAs and schools, as well as the
impacts on LEAs, schools and children,
Congress has mandated that FNS
conduct an evaluation of the CE Option.
The objectives of the study are:
• To estimate the number of eligible
LEAs and schools that do not choose the
CE Option;
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• To assess the barriers to
participation in the CE Option in nonparticipating but eligible LEAs and
schools;
• To describe the LEAs and schools
participating in the CE Option;
• To examine the impacts of the CE
Option on (1) Program integrity,
(2) availability of School Breakfast
Program, (3) nutritional quality of
meals, (4) program participation by
students,
(5) program administration, (6)
foodservice revenues and costs; and
• To provide input to FNS
deliberations about the key parameters
for the CE Option: The multiplier for
determining the percentage of meals
reimbursed at the free rate (currently 1.6
times the ISP) and the threshold value
of the ISP for determining eligibility to
implement the option.
The activities to be undertaken
subject to this notice include:
• Interviews with State Child
Nutrition (CN) Directors, LEA
Foodservice Directors, School Cafeteria
Managers, and School Administrators
• Telephone Survey of State CN
Directors
• Web based Implementation Survey
of LEA Foodservice Directors
(participating, eligible nonparticipating, and near eligible)
• Participation, Enrollment,
Attendance, and Revenue Web Survey
of LEA Foodservice Directors
• Pre-visit LEA Foodservice Director
Questionnaire
• Pre-visit School Information
Questionnaire (School Cafeteria
Managers)
• Menu Survey
• Data abstraction from certification
records
• Cashier observations
• Meal counts and claims review
Affected Public: State and Local
Governments.
Type of Respondents: 51 State CN
Directors, 1400 LEA Foodservice
Directors, 353 School Cafeteria
Managers, and 125 School
Administrators.
Estimated Total Number of
Respondents: 1,929.
Frequency of Response: Each
instrument will be administered once to
each respondent with two exceptions.
State CN Directors in seven of eleven
States will be interviewed twice over
the course of the study (once annually);
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
73583
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
State CN directors in four States will be
interviewed once. School cafeteria
managers will complete the Menu
Survey on each day of the five-day site
visit.
Estimated Annual Responses: 4,300.
Estimate of Time per Respondent and
Annual Burden: Public reporting burden
for this collection of information is
estimated to average forty-five (45)
minutes per State CN Director
interview, ninety (90) minutes per LEA
Foodservice Director interview, thirty
(30) minutes per School Cafeteria
Manager interview, and forty-five (45)
minutes per School Administrator
interview. Reporting burden is
estimated at twenty (20) minutes per
State CN Director telephone survey.
completed form and the Meal Counting
and Claiming Review Form is estimated
at forty-five (45) minutes per completed
form. Estimated burden for the Meal and
Cashier Observation form is 10 minutes
per completed form. The initial sample
in the School Community Eligibility
Study includes 51 State CN Directors
(with 11 completing interviews and
survey, plus 40 completing survey
only), 1,400 LEA Foodservice Directors,
353 School Cafeteria Managers, and 125
School Administrators. We expect
responses from 45 State CN Directors,
1,120 LEA Foodservice Directors, 318
School Cafeteria Managers, and 100
School Administrators. The annual
reporting burden is estimated at 2,573.5
hours (see table below).
Reporting burden is estimated at
twenty-five (25) minutes per completed
implementation web survey for the LEA
Foodservice Directors and one hundred
seventy (170) minutes per completed
Participation, Enrollment, Attendance,
and Revenue web survey for LEA
Foodservice Directors. The reporting
burden is estimated at ten (10) minutes
per completed LEA Foodservice
Director pre-visit questionnaire and
fifteen (15) minutes per completed
School Cafeteria Manager pre-visit
questionnaire. Estimated reporting
burden for Menu Surveys is forty-five
(45) minutes per complete. The burden
for the Data Abstraction Form/
Certification Record Review Form is
estimated at thirty (30) minutes per
Data collection activity
Implementation Study Interviews (telephone).
State CN Director ................
State Survey (telephone) .....
State CN Director ................
Implementation Web Survey
LEA Foodservice Directors
Participation, Enrollment, Attendance and Revenue
Web Survey.
LEA Foodservice Directors
Pre-visit LEA Questionnaire
LEA Foodservice Directors
Interviews .............................
LEA Foodservice Directors
Estimated
number of
respondents
Respondents
Frequency of
response
Estimated total
annual
reponses
Average
burden hours
per response
(in hours)
Total annual
burden estimate
(in hours)
Completed .......
11
1 to 2 1
18
0.75
13.5
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Attempted ........
Completed .......
0
45
6
1,120
280
240
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
45
6
1,120
280
240
0.05
0.33
0.05
0.42
0.05
2.83
0
15.0
0.3
470.4
14.0
679.2
60
106
27
106
27
318
35
100
25
106
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
60
106
27
106
27
318
35
100
25
318
0.05
0.17
0.05
1.50
0.05
0.5
0.05
0.75
0.05
0.50
3.0
18.0
1.4
159.0
1.4
159.0
1.8
75.0
1.3
159.0
Data Abstraction Form/Certification Record Review
Form.
LEA Foodservice Directors
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Pre-visit School Information
Questionnaire.
School Cafeteria Managers
Attempted ........
Completed .......
0
156
1
1
0
156
0.05
0.25
0
39.0
Menu Survey Booklet ..........
School Cafeteria Managers
Meal and Cashier Observation Form.
School Cafeteria Managers
Attempted ........
Completed .......
Attempted ........
Completed .......
39
156
39
156
1
5
1
1
39
780
39
156
0.05
0.75
0.05
0.17
2.0
585.0
2.0
26.5
Meal Counting and Claiming
Review Form (School).
School Cafeteria Managers
Attempted ........
Completed .......
39
156
1
1
39
156
0.05
0.75
2.0
117.0
Meal Counting and Claiming
Review Form (LEA).
LEA Foodservice Directors
Attempted ........
Completed .......
39
52
1
1
39
52
0.05
0.50
2.0
26.0
.............................................
Attempted ........
.........................
13
3,457
1
¥
13
4,300
0.05
0.60
0.7
2573.5
School Cafeteria Managers
School Administrators .........
Total ..............................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 Seven
States will complete twice, four States will complete once.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
73584
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices
Dated: November 22, 2011.
Jeffrey J. Tribiano,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–30667 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Assessment of
the Contributions of an Interview to
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program Eligibility and Benefit
Determinations
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on a
proposed information collection. This
proposed collection is for ‘‘Assessment
of the Contributions of an Interview to
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program Eligibility and Benefit
Determinations.’’ The proposed
collection will examine if there is a
difference in payment accuracy,
program access, administrative costs,
and client satisfaction under two
conditions: usual application
procedures and the no-interview test
condition.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before January 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
and (c) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Steven
Carlson, Director, Office of Research and
Analysis, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Steven Carlson at (703) 305–2576 or
via email to
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
Steve.Carlson@fns.usda.gov. Comments
will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m. Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Steven Carlson at
(703) 305–2017.
Abstract: The Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) is a critical
source of support for many low-income
families and individuals. In recent
years, States have changed the way
clients enroll in SNAP. A central feature
of the changes is a waiver that allows
States to conduct the in-person
eligibility interview over the telephone.
Many States have implemented this
interview waiver. Some states have
expressed interest in exploring
alternative certification approaches that
do not require conducting any
interviews in the SNAP eligibility
determination process. However, there
is little data available to assess the
impact of eliminating a certification
interview on client access, customer
service, and program integrity. This
study will focus on the contributions of
interviews to the determination of
SNAP eligibility and benefits. It will
examine if there is a difference in
payment accuracy, program access,
administrative costs, and client
satisfaction under two conditions: usual
application procedures and the nointerview test condition.
Three states—North Carolina, Oregon,
and Utah—applied and were selected to
conduct this study. North Carolina and
Oregon will be conducting the study in
selected demonstration sites and Utah
will randomly select clients across the
entire state. All three states will limit
the size of the no-interview test
condition to 20 percent of their
caseload. Each state will identify a
comparison site(s) that represents its
current application procedures. These
comparison sites will be similar to the
no-interview demonstration sites in
terms of population characteristics,
population density, SNAP participation
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
trends, SNAP advocacy and outreach,
economic indicators, and other factors.
Project findings will help policymakers
understand the contributions of an
interview for eligibility and benefit
determination.
The project has eight research
objectives: (1) Describe the eligibility
determination procedures under the
current system and the demonstration
condition in each State; (2) describe any
modernization activities in each State
that complement the waiver to make its
application most effective; (3) describe
the process for implementing the
waivers; (4) describe the responses of
clients to the no-interview condition; (5)
describe the responses of SNAP staff to
the no-interview condition; (6) describe
the responses of community partners
and other stakeholders to the nointerview condition; (7) document the
impact of the no-interview condition;
and (8) document the main take-away
points from the study to inform FNS.
Data will be collected from four
sources:
• First, site visits will be conducted to
observe demonstration and comparison
procedures and to interview
professional staff who work at SNAP
offices or related not-for-profit
organizations.
• Second, each State will conduct
Quality Control (QC)-like reviews both
before and after implementing the
demonstration projects. The States will
select 225 to 300 clients to interview
from the demonstration site during each
round of reviews. The State will use the
same procedures to interview clients as
it uses to conduct its Federal QC
reviews. These data will be used to
measure the accuracy of the eligibility
and benefit determinations under both
the no-interview and the States’ regular
interview procedures.
• Third, clients will be surveyed by
telephone about their recent
application/recertification experiences
under the interview conditions to
provide their perspectives on the
process. Clients will receive an advance
letter about the survey, including a $2
pre-interview cash incentive. The
telephone interview will last five to
seven minutes. Clients will also receive
a $10 gift card to a local store after
completing the survey.
• Finally, a total of four focus groups
will be conducted in each State—two
focus groups in the no-interview sites
and two focus groups in the interview
sites. These focus groups will be
conducted with ‘‘procedural denials’’—
individuals who submit a SNAP
application but are denied SNAP
benefits because they fail to complete
the subsequent stages of the application
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73582-73584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30667]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 /
Notices
[[Page 73582]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--Community Eligibility Option Evaluation
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection. This collection is a new
information collection for the Community Eligibility Option Evaluation.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by January 30,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. Comments may be sent to: John
Endahl, Senior Program Analyst, Office of Research and Analysis, Food
and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1004,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be submitted via fax to the
attention of John Endahl at (703) 305-2576 or via email to
john.endahl@fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and
follow the online instructions for submitting comments electronically.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans,
contact John Endahl, Senior Program Analyst, Office of Research and
Analysis, Food and Nutrition Service/USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
1004, Alexandria, VA 22302; Fax: (703) 305-2576; Email:
john.endahl@fns.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Community Eligibility Option Evaluation.
OMB Number: 0584-NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not yet determined.
Type of Information Collection Request: New information collection.
Abstract: Section 104(a) of the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act (the
Act) of 2010 provides the Community Eligibility Option (the CE Option)
for Local Educational Authorities (LEAs) and schools, as an alternative
to household applications for Free or Reduced Price meals. Under the CE
Option, families are not required to submit applications for free or
reduced-price meals, and schools are required to provide free meals to
all students. The Act sets a reimbursement formula based on the
percentage of students directly certified or otherwise approved without
application (the Identified Student Percentage or ISP). The potential
benefits are that more students participate, meals are more nutritious,
and LEAs may experience reductions in administrative burden and errors.
In order to understand how the CE Option is implemented, incentives and
barriers for LEAs and schools, as well as the impacts on LEAs, schools
and children, Congress has mandated that FNS conduct an evaluation of
the CE Option. The objectives of the study are:
To estimate the number of eligible LEAs and schools that
do not choose the CE Option;
To assess the barriers to participation in the CE Option
in non-participating but eligible LEAs and schools;
To describe the LEAs and schools participating in the CE
Option;
To examine the impacts of the CE Option on (1) Program
integrity, (2) availability of School Breakfast Program, (3)
nutritional quality of meals, (4) program participation by students,
(5) program administration, (6) foodservice revenues and costs; and
To provide input to FNS deliberations about the key
parameters for the CE Option: The multiplier for determining the
percentage of meals reimbursed at the free rate (currently 1.6 times
the ISP) and the threshold value of the ISP for determining eligibility
to implement the option.
The activities to be undertaken subject to this notice include:
Interviews with State Child Nutrition (CN) Directors, LEA
Foodservice Directors, School Cafeteria Managers, and School
Administrators
Telephone Survey of State CN Directors
Web based Implementation Survey of LEA Foodservice
Directors (participating, eligible non-participating, and near
eligible)
Participation, Enrollment, Attendance, and Revenue Web
Survey of LEA Foodservice Directors
Pre-visit LEA Foodservice Director Questionnaire
Pre-visit School Information Questionnaire (School
Cafeteria Managers)
Menu Survey
Data abstraction from certification records
Cashier observations
Meal counts and claims review
Affected Public: State and Local Governments.
Type of Respondents: 51 State CN Directors, 1400 LEA Foodservice
Directors, 353 School Cafeteria Managers, and 125 School
Administrators.
Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 1,929.
Frequency of Response: Each instrument will be administered once to
each respondent with two exceptions. State CN Directors in seven of
eleven States will be interviewed twice over the course of the study
(once annually);
[[Page 73583]]
State CN directors in four States will be interviewed once. School
cafeteria managers will complete the Menu Survey on each day of the
five-day site visit.
Estimated Annual Responses: 4,300.
Estimate of Time per Respondent and Annual Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
forty-five (45) minutes per State CN Director interview, ninety (90)
minutes per LEA Foodservice Director interview, thirty (30) minutes per
School Cafeteria Manager interview, and forty-five (45) minutes per
School Administrator interview. Reporting burden is estimated at twenty
(20) minutes per State CN Director telephone survey. Reporting burden
is estimated at twenty-five (25) minutes per completed implementation
web survey for the LEA Foodservice Directors and one hundred seventy
(170) minutes per completed Participation, Enrollment, Attendance, and
Revenue web survey for LEA Foodservice Directors. The reporting burden
is estimated at ten (10) minutes per completed LEA Foodservice Director
pre-visit questionnaire and fifteen (15) minutes per completed School
Cafeteria Manager pre-visit questionnaire. Estimated reporting burden
for Menu Surveys is forty-five (45) minutes per complete. The burden
for the Data Abstraction Form/Certification Record Review Form is
estimated at thirty (30) minutes per completed form and the Meal
Counting and Claiming Review Form is estimated at forty-five (45)
minutes per completed form. Estimated burden for the Meal and Cashier
Observation form is 10 minutes per completed form. The initial sample
in the School Community Eligibility Study includes 51 State CN
Directors (with 11 completing interviews and survey, plus 40 completing
survey only), 1,400 LEA Foodservice Directors, 353 School Cafeteria
Managers, and 125 School Administrators. We expect responses from 45
State CN Directors, 1,120 LEA Foodservice Directors, 318 School
Cafeteria Managers, and 100 School Administrators. The annual reporting
burden is estimated at 2,573.5 hours (see table below).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Estimated Frequency of Estimated hours per Total annual
Data collection activity Respondents number of response total annual response (in burden estimate
respondents reponses hours) (in hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation Study Interviews State CN Director. Completed......... 11 1 to 2 \1\ 18 0.75 13.5
(telephone).
Attempted......... 0 2 0 0.05 0
State Survey (telephone)....... State CN Director. Completed......... 45 1 45 0.33 15.0
Attempted......... 6 1 6 0.05 0.3
Implementation Web Survey...... LEA Foodservice Completed......... 1,120 1 1,120 0.42 470.4
Directors.
Attempted......... 280 1 280 0.05 14.0
Participation, Enrollment, LEA Foodservice Completed......... 240 1 240 2.83 679.2
Attendance and Revenue Web Directors.
Survey.
Attempted......... 60 1 60 0.05 3.0
Pre-visit LEA Questionnaire.... LEA Foodservice Completed......... 106 1 106 0.17 18.0
Directors.
Attempted......... 27 1 27 0.05 1.4
Interviews..................... LEA Foodservice Completed......... 106 1 106 1.50 159.0
Directors.
Attempted......... 27 1 27 0.05 1.4
School Cafeteria Completed......... 318 1 318 0.5 159.0
Managers.
Attempted......... 35 1 35 0.05 1.8
School Completed......... 100 1 100 0.75 75.0
Administrators.
Attempted......... 25 1 25 0.05 1.3
Data Abstraction Form/ LEA Foodservice Completed......... 106 3 318 0.50 159.0
Certification Record Review Directors.
Form.
Attempted......... 0 1 0 0.05 0
Pre-visit School Information School Cafeteria Completed......... 156 1 156 0.25 39.0
Questionnaire. Managers.
Attempted......... 39 1 39 0.05 2.0
Menu Survey Booklet............ School Cafeteria Completed......... 156 5 780 0.75 585.0
Managers.
Attempted......... 39 1 39 0.05 2.0
Meal and Cashier Observation School Cafeteria Completed......... 156 1 156 0.17 26.5
Form. Managers.
Attempted......... 39 1 39 0.05 2.0
Meal Counting and Claiming School Cafeteria Completed......... 156 1 156 0.75 117.0
Review Form (School). Managers.
Attempted......... 39 1 39 0.05 2.0
Meal Counting and Claiming LEA Foodservice Completed......... 52 1 52 0.50 26.0
Review Form (LEA). Directors.
Attempted......... 13 1 13 0.05 0.7
Total...................... .................. .................. 3,457 - 4,300 0.60 2573.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Seven States will complete twice, four States will complete once.
[[Page 73584]]
Dated: November 22, 2011.
Jeffrey J. Tribiano,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-30667 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
