Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Airplanes, 73491-73494 [2011-29801]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Honeywell
International Inc. ALF502L–2C, ALF502R–3,
ALF502R–3A, ALF502R–5, LF507–1F, and
LF507–IH turbofan engines with any of the
second stage high pressure compressor
(HPC2) discs, part number (P/N) 2–101–332–
12, serial numbers (S/N) listed in Table 2 of
Honeywell International Inc. Service Bulletin
(SB) No. ALF/LF–72–1113, dated September
16, 2011, installed.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of
cracks found in an HPC2 disc during routine
inspection. We are issuing this AD to prevent
the affected discs from fracturing before
reaching the currently published life limit. A
disc fracture could result in an uncontained
failure of the disc and damage to the
airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD before accumulating
4,500 cycles-since-new on the affected HPC2
disc, or before exceeding 7 years after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
first, unless already done.
(f) Removal of Affected HPC2 Discs
Remove from service HPC2 discs, P/N 2–
101–332–12, S/Ns listed in Table 2 of
Honeywell International Inc. SB No. ALF/
LF–72–1113, dated September 16, 2011.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(h) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Robert Baitoo, Aerospace Engineer,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA
90712; phone: (562) 627–5245; fax: (562)
627–5210; email: robert.baitoo@faa.gov.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference
You must use the following service
information to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the
following service information on the date
specified:
(1) Honeywell International Inc. Service
Bulletin No. ALF/LF–72–1113, dated
September 16, 2011, approved for IBR
December 14, 2011.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Honeywell International
Inc., P.O. Box 52181, Phoenix, AZ 85072–
2181, phone: (800) 601–3099; Web site:
https://portal.honeywell.com/wps/portal/aero.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(781) 238–7125.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
November 15, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–30575 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1206; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–216–AD; Amendment
39–16868; AD 2011–24–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
Douglas Corporation Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model DC–10–10, DC–10–10F, and MD–
10–10F airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of three instances
of fuel leaks in the lower cap splice of
the wing rear spar at station Xors=409.
Investigation revealed the fuel leak was
due to a crack in the lower cap. If not
corrected, this condition could result in
fuel leaks or cracking of the lower wing
skin and structure, causing possible
inability of the structure to sustain the
limit load and adversely affecting the
structural integrity of the airplane. This
AD requires repetitive inspections for
cracking on the lower cap of the rear
spar of the left and right wings between
stations Xors=417 and the outboard
edge of the lower cap splice of the wing
rear spar at station Xors=400; temporary
and permanent repairs if necessary; and
repetitive inspections of repaired areas,
and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 3,
2012.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of January 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, 3855
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73491
Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019,
Long Beach, California 90846–0001;
telephone (206) 544–5000, extension 2;
fax (206) 766–5683; email
dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (425) 227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: (800) 647–5527)
is Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712–4137; phone: (562)
627–5234; fax: (562) 627–5210; email:
nenita.odesa@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 30, 2010 (75 FR
82333). That NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections for cracking on
the lower cap of the rear spar of the left
and right wings between stations
Xors=417 and the outboard edge of the
lower cap splice of the wing rear spar
at station Xors=400; temporary and
permanent repairs if necessary; and
repetitive inspections of repaired areas,
and corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (75
FR 82333, December 30, 2010) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
New Service Information
Since publication of the NPRM (75 FR
82333, December 30, 2010), Boeing has
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
73492
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
issued Alert Service Bulletin DC10–
57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23,
2011. We have updated the references in
paragraphs (c) and (g) of this AD to
include Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC10–57A156, Revision 2, dated August
23, 2011. The changes in this revised
service bulletin are for clarification
only. However, certain inspections
called eddy current test high frequency
(ETHF) inspections in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC10–57A156,
Revision 1, dated March 10, 2010
(which was referenced in the NPRM (75
FR 82333, December 30, 2010) as the
appropriate source of service
information for certain actions), are
called high frequency eddy current
inspections in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin DC10–57A156, Revision 2,
dated August 23, 2011. This is different
terminology for the same inspection
method. We have followed the
terminology in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin DC10–57A156, Revision 2,
dated August 23, 2011, and used both
terminologies as specified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin DC10–57A156,
Revision 2, dated August 23, 2011. We
are also allowing credit for actions done
before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin DC10–57A156, Revision 1,
dated March 10, 2010, and have added
that reference to paragraph (h) of this
AD.
Since publication of the NPRM (75 FR
82333, December 30, 2010), Boeing has
also issued revised service rework
drawings to clarify the repair
instructions. These service rework
drawings do not provide repairs for all
conditions specified in the NPRM (75
FR 82333, December 30, 2010). We have
updated the references in paragraph (g)
of this AD to include Boeing DC–10–10
Service Rework Drawing SR10570019,
Revision K, dated April 17, 2009,
including Parts List PL SR10570019,
Revision K, dated April 23, 2009,
including Boeing Engineering Order,
Revision L, dated April 14, 2010; and
Boeing DC–10–10 Service Rework
Drawing SR10570048, Revision K, dated
October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL
SR10570048, Revision K, dated October
14, 2010. We have also revised the
actions in paragraph (g) of this AD to
specify which conditions are addressed
by these service rework drawings, and
which conditions need a repair method
approved by the FAA.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed with the changes described
previously—except for minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (75 FR
82333, December 30, 2010), for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 68
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspection ........................
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 per inspection cycle.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
14:37 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
$0
Cost per product
$170 per inspection
cycle.
Regulatory Findings
Authority for This Rulemaking
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Parts cost
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost on U.S. operators
$11,560 per inspection
cycle.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2011–24–04 McDonnell Douglas
Corporation: Amendment 39–16868;
Docket No. FAA–2010–1206; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–216–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 3, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas
Corporation Model DC–10–10, DC–10–10F,
and MD–10–10F airplanes; certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Alert
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Service Bulletin DC10–57A156, Revision 2,
dated August 23, 2011.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD results from reports of three
instances of fuel leaks in the lower cap splice
of the wing rear spar at station Xors=409. The
Federal Aviation Administration is issuing
this AD to detect and correct cracking on the
lower cap of the rear spar of the left and right
wings between stations Xors=417 and the
outboard edge of the lower cap splice of the
wing rear spar at station Xors=400, which
could result in fuel leaks or cracking of the
lower wing skin and structure, causing
possible inability of the structure to sustain
the limit load and adversely affecting the
structural integrity of the airplane.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Inspection
Within 1,750 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, do an eddy current
test high frequency (ETHF) inspection for
cracking on the lower cap of the rear spar of
the left and right wings between stations
Xors=417 and the outboard edge of the lower
cap splice of the wing rear spar at station
Xors=400, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC10–57A156, Revision 2,
dated August 23, 2011.
(1) If no cracking is found, repeat the
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,750
flight cycles.
(2) If any cracking is found in the spar cap
aft leg at the fastener holes, and that cracking
can be removed by hole enlargement, before
further flight, do a permanent repair, in
accordance with Boeing DC–10–10 Service
Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K,
dated October 7, 2010, including Parts List
PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated October
14, 2010. Within 1,750 flight cycles after
doing the applicable permanent repair, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,750
flight cycles, do ETHF and high frequency
eddy current inspections for cracking in
accordance with Boeing DC–10–10 Service
Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K,
dated October 7, 2010, including Parts List
PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated October
14, 2010. If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this paragraph, before
further flight, repair the cracking, in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(3) If any cracking is found in the spar cap
aft leg at the fastener holes, and that cracking
cannot be removed by hole enlargement but
it does not extend into the vertical leg, before
further flight, do the applicable actions
specified in paragraph (g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of
this AD:
(i) If cracking is found between Station
Xors=400 and inboard of Station Xors=408,
repair the cracking, in accordance with the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD (Alternative Method of Compliance
(AMOCs) paragraph).
(ii) If cracking is found between Stations
Xors=408 and Xors=417, do a permanent
repair, in accordance with Boeing DC–10–10
Service Rework Drawing SR10570048,
Revision K, dated October 7, 2010, including
Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated
October 14, 2010. Within 4,550 flight cycles
after doing a permanent repair, and thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 4,550 flight cycles,
do ETHF and ultrasonic inspections for
cracking, in accordance with Boeing DC–10–
10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570048,
Revision K, dated October 7, 2010, including
Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated
October 14, 2010. If any cracking is found
during any inspection required by this
paragraph, before further flight, repair the
cracking, in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(4) If any cracking is found in the spar cap
aft leg at fastener holes and that cracking
extends into the vertical leg of the spar cap,
do the actions specified in paragraph (g)(4)(i)
or (g)(4)(ii) of this AD.
(i) If any cracking is found between Station
Xors=400 and inboard of Station Xors=408,
before further flight, do the applicable
permanent repair, in accordance with Boeing
DC–10–10 Service Rework Drawing
SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 17,
2009, including Parts List PL SR10570019,
Revision K, dated April 23, 2009, including
Boeing Engineering Order, Revision L, dated
April 14, 2010. Within 4,550 flight cycles
after doing the permanent repair, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,550
flight cycles, do ETHF and ultrasonic
inspections for cracking of the repaired area,
in accordance with Boeing DC–10–10 Service
Rework Drawing SR10570019, Revision K,
dated April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL
SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23,
2009, including Boeing Engineering Order,
Revision L, dated April 14, 2010. If any
cracking is found during any inspection
required by this paragraph, before further
flight, repair the cracking, in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of
this AD.
(ii) If any cracking is found between
Stations Xors=408 and Xors=417, do the
actions in paragraphs (g)(4)(ii)(A) or
(g)(4)(ii)(B) of this AD.
(A) Do the actions in paragraphs
(g)(4)(ii)(A)(1) and (g)(4)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, do a temporary
repair, in accordance with Boeing DC–10–10
Service Rework Drawing SR10570048,
Revision K, dated October 7, 2010, including
Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated
October 14, 2010. Within 1,650 flight cycles
after doing the temporary repair; and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,650
flight cycles, do ETHF and ultrasonic
inspections for cracking of the repaired area,
in accordance with Boeing DC–10–10 Service
Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K,
dated October 7, 2010, including Parts List
PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated October
14, 2010, until the permanent repair required
by paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD is
done. If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this paragraph, before
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73493
further flight, repair the cracking, in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(2) Within 7,000 flight cycles after the
temporary repair has been done, do the
applicable permanent repair, in accordance
with Boeing DC–10–10 Service Rework
Drawing SR10570019, Revision K, dated
April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL
SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23,
2009, including Boeing Engineering Order,
Revision L, dated April 14, 2010. Within
4,550 flight cycles after doing the permanent
repair, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 4,550 flight cycles, do ETHF and
ultrasonic inspections for cracking of the
repaired area, in accordance with Boeing DC–
10–10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570019,
Revision K, dated April 17, 2009, including
Parts List PL SR10570019, Revision K, dated
April 23, 2009, including Boeing Engineering
Order, Revision L, dated April 14, 2010. If
any cracking is found during any inspection
required by this paragraph, before further
flight, repair the cracking, in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of
this AD.
(B) Before further flight do the applicable
permanent repair, in accordance with Boeing
DC–10–10 Service Rework Drawing
SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 17,
2009, including Parts List PL SR10570019,
Revision K, dated April 23, 2009, including
Boeing Engineering Order, Revision L, dated
April 14, 2010. Within 4,550 flight cycles
after doing the permanent repair, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,550
flight cycles, do ETHF and ultrasonic
inspections for cracking of the repaired area,
in accordance with Boeing DC–10–10 Service
Rework Drawing SR10570019, Revision K,
dated April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL
SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23,
2009, including Boeing Engineering Order,
Revision L, dated April 14, 2010. If any
cracking is found during any inspection
required by this paragraph, before further
flight, repair the cracking, in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of
this AD.
(h) Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
Actions accomplished before the effective
date of this AD according to Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC10–57A156, dated
September 16, 2009; and Revision 1, dated
March 10, 2010; are considered acceptable
for compliance with the corresponding
actions specified in this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, (ACO) FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712–4137; phone: (562) 627–
5234; fax: (562) 627–5210; email:
nenita.odessa@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
73494
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712–4137; phone:
(562) 627–5234; fax: (562) 627–5210; email:
nenita.odessa@faa.gov.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane and 14
CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
14 CFR Part 39
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
You must use the following service
information to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) under
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the
following service information on the date
specified:
(1) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10–
57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23, 2011;
IBR approved January 3, 2012.
(2) Boeing DC–10–10 Service Rework
Drawing SR10570019, Revision K, dated
April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL
SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23,
2009, including Boeing Engineering Order,
Revision L, dated April 14, 2010; IBR
approved January 3, 2012. Only Sheet 1 of
this drawing indicates the revision date of
this document.
(3) Boeing DC–10–10 Service Rework
Drawing SR10570048, Revision K, dated
October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL
SR10570048, Revision K, dated October 14,
2010; IBR approved January 3, 2012. Only
Sheet 1 of this drawing indicates the revision
date for this document.
(4) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC
D800–0019, Long Beach, California 90846–
0001; telephone (206) 544–5000, extension 2;
fax (206) 766–5683; email
dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(5) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(425) 227–1221.
(6) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Nov 28, 2011
Jkt 226001
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1031; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NE–27–AD; Amendment 39–
16871; AD 2011–24–07]
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220
Tarnos, France; phone: 33–05–59–74–
40–00, fax: 33–05–59–74–45–15. You
may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238–
7125.
RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca
S.A. Arriel 2B Turboshaft Engines
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (phone:
(800) 647–5527) is the same as the Mail
address provided in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Riley, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238–7758; fax: (781) 238–
7199; email: mark.riley@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 7, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–29801 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
Non-conformities on adjustment of some
hydromechanical units (HMUs) have been
reported by a Turbomeca repair centre. The
technical investigations carried out by
Turbomeca are showing that only a limited
number of HMUs are potentially affected by
this non-conformity to HMU adjustment.
Twenty nine HMUs have been
identified with the non-conformities.
We are issuing this AD to prevent an
uncommanded inflight shutdown,
which could result in an emergency
autorotation landing.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 14, 2011.
We must receive comments on this
AD by December 29, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of December 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0128–E,
dated July 6, 2011 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Non-conformities on adjustment of some
hydromechanical units (HMUs) have been
reported by a Turbomeca repair centre. The
technical investigations carried out by
Turbomeca are showing that only a limited
number of HMUs are potentially affected by
this non-conformity to HMU adjustment.
Twenty nine HMUs have been
identified with potential nonconformities in the proper adjustment of
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73491-73494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29801]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1206; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-216-AD;
Amendment 39-16868; AD 2011-24-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model DC-10-10, DC-10-10F, and MD-10-10F airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of three instances of fuel leaks in the lower cap
splice of the wing rear spar at station Xors=409. Investigation
revealed the fuel leak was due to a crack in the lower cap. If not
corrected, this condition could result in fuel leaks or cracking of the
lower wing skin and structure, causing possible inability of the
structure to sustain the limit load and adversely affecting the
structural integrity of the airplane. This AD requires repetitive
inspections for cracking on the lower cap of the rear spar of the left
and right wings between stations Xors=417 and the outboard edge of the
lower cap splice of the wing rear spar at station Xors=400; temporary
and permanent repairs if necessary; and repetitive inspections of
repaired areas, and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing
this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 3, 2012.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of January 3,
2012.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone (206) 544-5000, extension 2; fax (206) 766-5683; email
dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (425) 227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: (800) 647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137;
phone: (562) 627-5234; fax: (562) 627-5210; email:
nenita.odesa@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 30, 2010
(75 FR 82333). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for
cracking on the lower cap of the rear spar of the left and right wings
between stations Xors=417 and the outboard edge of the lower cap splice
of the wing rear spar at station Xors=400; temporary and permanent
repairs if necessary; and repetitive inspections of repaired areas, and
corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (75 FR 82333, December 30,
2010) or on the determination of the cost to the public.
New Service Information
Since publication of the NPRM (75 FR 82333, December 30, 2010),
Boeing has
[[Page 73492]]
issued Alert Service Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23,
2011. We have updated the references in paragraphs (c) and (g) of this
AD to include Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 2,
dated August 23, 2011. The changes in this revised service bulletin are
for clarification only. However, certain inspections called eddy
current test high frequency (ETHF) inspections in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 1, dated March 10, 2010 (which was
referenced in the NPRM (75 FR 82333, December 30, 2010) as the
appropriate source of service information for certain actions), are
called high frequency eddy current inspections in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23, 2011. This is
different terminology for the same inspection method. We have followed
the terminology in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision
2, dated August 23, 2011, and used both terminologies as specified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23,
2011. We are also allowing credit for actions done before the effective
date of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10-
57A156, Revision 1, dated March 10, 2010, and have added that reference
to paragraph (h) of this AD.
Since publication of the NPRM (75 FR 82333, December 30, 2010),
Boeing has also issued revised service rework drawings to clarify the
repair instructions. These service rework drawings do not provide
repairs for all conditions specified in the NPRM (75 FR 82333, December
30, 2010). We have updated the references in paragraph (g) of this AD
to include Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570019, Revision
K, dated April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL SR10570019, Revision
K, dated April 23, 2009, including Boeing Engineering Order, Revision
L, dated April 14, 2010; and Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing
SR10570048, Revision K, dated October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL
SR10570048, Revision K, dated October 14, 2010. We have also revised
the actions in paragraph (g) of this AD to specify which conditions are
addressed by these service rework drawings, and which conditions need a
repair method approved by the FAA.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed with the
changes described previously--except for minor editorial changes. We
have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (75 FR 82333, December 30, 2010), for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 68 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts
Action Labor cost cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection................... 2 work-hours x $85 $0 $170 per $11,560 per inspection cycle.
per hour = $170 per inspection
inspection cycle. cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2011-24-04 McDonnell Douglas Corporation: Amendment 39-16868; Docket
No. FAA-2010-1206; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-216-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective January 3, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-10-10,
DC-10-10F, and MD-10-10F airplanes; certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert
[[Page 73493]]
Service Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23, 2011.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD results from reports of three instances of fuel leaks in
the lower cap splice of the wing rear spar at station Xors=409. The
Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracking on the lower cap of the rear spar of the left and
right wings between stations Xors=417 and the outboard edge of the
lower cap splice of the wing rear spar at station Xors=400, which
could result in fuel leaks or cracking of the lower wing skin and
structure, causing possible inability of the structure to sustain
the limit load and adversely affecting the structural integrity of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Inspection
Within 1,750 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
do an eddy current test high frequency (ETHF) inspection for
cracking on the lower cap of the rear spar of the left and right
wings between stations Xors=417 and the outboard edge of the lower
cap splice of the wing rear spar at station Xors=400, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 2, dated August 23, 2011.
(1) If no cracking is found, repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,750
flight cycles.
(2) If any cracking is found in the spar cap aft leg at the
fastener holes, and that cracking can be removed by hole
enlargement, before further flight, do a permanent repair, in
accordance with Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570048,
Revision K, dated October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL
SR10570048, Revision K, dated October 14, 2010. Within 1,750 flight
cycles after doing the applicable permanent repair, and thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 1,750 flight cycles, do ETHF and high
frequency eddy current inspections for cracking in accordance with
Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K, dated
October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision K,
dated October 14, 2010. If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this paragraph, before further flight, repair
the cracking, in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(3) If any cracking is found in the spar cap aft leg at the
fastener holes, and that cracking cannot be removed by hole
enlargement but it does not extend into the vertical leg, before
further flight, do the applicable actions specified in paragraph
(g)(3)(i) or (g)(3)(ii) of this AD:
(i) If cracking is found between Station Xors=400 and inboard of
Station Xors=408, repair the cracking, in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD (Alternative Method
of Compliance (AMOCs) paragraph).
(ii) If cracking is found between Stations Xors=408 and
Xors=417, do a permanent repair, in accordance with Boeing DC-10-10
Service Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K, dated October 7,
2010, including Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated October
14, 2010. Within 4,550 flight cycles after doing a permanent repair,
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,550 flight cycles, do
ETHF and ultrasonic inspections for cracking, in accordance with
Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K, dated
October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision K,
dated October 14, 2010. If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this paragraph, before further flight, repair
the cracking, in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(4) If any cracking is found in the spar cap aft leg at fastener
holes and that cracking extends into the vertical leg of the spar
cap, do the actions specified in paragraph (g)(4)(i) or (g)(4)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) If any cracking is found between Station Xors=400 and
inboard of Station Xors=408, before further flight, do the
applicable permanent repair, in accordance with Boeing DC-10-10
Service Rework Drawing SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 17, 2009,
including Parts List PL SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23,
2009, including Boeing Engineering Order, Revision L, dated April
14, 2010. Within 4,550 flight cycles after doing the permanent
repair, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,550 flight
cycles, do ETHF and ultrasonic inspections for cracking of the
repaired area, in accordance with Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework
Drawing SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 17, 2009, including
Parts List PL SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23, 2009,
including Boeing Engineering Order, Revision L, dated April 14,
2010. If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
this paragraph, before further flight, repair the cracking, in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(ii) If any cracking is found between Stations Xors=408 and
Xors=417, do the actions in paragraphs (g)(4)(ii)(A) or
(g)(4)(ii)(B) of this AD.
(A) Do the actions in paragraphs (g)(4)(ii)(A)(1) and
(g)(4)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, do a temporary repair, in accordance
with Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K,
dated October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision
K, dated October 14, 2010. Within 1,650 flight cycles after doing
the temporary repair; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
1,650 flight cycles, do ETHF and ultrasonic inspections for cracking
of the repaired area, in accordance with Boeing DC-10-10 Service
Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision K, dated October 7, 2010,
including Parts List PL SR10570048, Revision K, dated October 14,
2010, until the permanent repair required by paragraph
(g)(4)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD is done. If any cracking is found during
any inspection required by this paragraph, before further flight,
repair the cracking, in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(2) Within 7,000 flight cycles after the temporary repair has
been done, do the applicable permanent repair, in accordance with
Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570019, Revision K, dated
April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL SR10570019, Revision K,
dated April 23, 2009, including Boeing Engineering Order, Revision
L, dated April 14, 2010. Within 4,550 flight cycles after doing the
permanent repair, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,550
flight cycles, do ETHF and ultrasonic inspections for cracking of
the repaired area, in accordance with Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework
Drawing SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 17, 2009, including
Parts List PL SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23, 2009,
including Boeing Engineering Order, Revision L, dated April 14,
2010. If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
this paragraph, before further flight, repair the cracking, in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(B) Before further flight do the applicable permanent repair, in
accordance with Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570019,
Revision K, dated April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL
SR10570019, Revision K, dated April 23, 2009, including Boeing
Engineering Order, Revision L, dated April 14, 2010. Within 4,550
flight cycles after doing the permanent repair, and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 4,550 flight cycles, do ETHF and ultrasonic
inspections for cracking of the repaired area, in accordance with
Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570019, Revision K, dated
April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL SR10570019, Revision K,
dated April 23, 2009, including Boeing Engineering Order, Revision
L, dated April 14, 2010. If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this paragraph, before further flight, repair
the cracking, in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(h) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD
according to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10-57A156, dated
September 16, 2009; and Revision 1, dated March 10, 2010; are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions
specified in this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
(ACO) FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712-4137; phone: (562) 627-5234; fax: (562)
627-5210; email: nenita.odessa@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time
[[Page 73494]]
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics
inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO to
make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair
must meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571,
Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Nenita Odesa,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; phone:
(562) 627-5234; fax: (562) 627-5210; email: nenita.odessa@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
You must use the following service information to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the following
service information on the date specified:
(1) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10-57A156, Revision 2, dated
August 23, 2011; IBR approved January 3, 2012.
(2) Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570019, Revision
K, dated April 17, 2009, including Parts List PL SR10570019,
Revision K, dated April 23, 2009, including Boeing Engineering
Order, Revision L, dated April 14, 2010; IBR approved January 3,
2012. Only Sheet 1 of this drawing indicates the revision date of
this document.
(3) Boeing DC-10-10 Service Rework Drawing SR10570048, Revision
K, dated October 7, 2010, including Parts List PL SR10570048,
Revision K, dated October 14, 2010; IBR approved January 3, 2012.
Only Sheet 1 of this drawing indicates the revision date for this
document.
(4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846-
0001; telephone (206) 544-5000, extension 2; fax (206) 766-5683;
email dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(5) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call (425) 227-1221.
(6) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call (202) 741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 7, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-29801 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P