Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC); Working Group Activity Update, 72997-73005 [2011-30476]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport
Surface Wireless Communications
Eleventh Meeting
DATES: The meeting will be held
December 6–7th, 2011, from 9 a.m.–5
p.m.
The meeting will be held at
Booz Allen Hamilton, 1201 Maryland
Avenue SW., Suite 5121B, Washington,
DC 20024
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW.,
Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by
telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202)
833–9434, or Web site at https://
www.rtca.org.
ADDRESSES:
Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby
given for a Special Committee 223,
Airport Surface Wireless
Communications Meeting. The agenda
will include the following:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
December 6th, 2011
• Plenary
• Welcome, Introductions,
Administrative Remarks by Special
Committee Leadership
• Designated Federal Official (DFO):
Mr. Brent Phillips
• Co-Chair: Mr. Aloke Roy,
Honeywell International
• Co-Chair: Mr. Ward Hall, ITT
Corporation
• Agenda Overview
• Review/Approve Joint EUROCAE
WG–82/RTCA SC–223 Plenary
meeting Summary—RTCA Paper
No. 220–11/SC223–023, and action
item status
• Review action items
• General Presentations of Interest
• WiMAX Forum status—WiMAX
Forum
´
• RTCA SC–206 Communique on
Attributes Capability Matrix
• ICAO Working Group S (plans/
proposals/actions???)
• AEEC SAI Action Regarding
AeroMACS Standards—Continental
Airlines
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Afternoon—MOPS WG Breakout Session
• MOPS Outline—Rockwell Collins
• Introduction Sections
• Discussion of Chapters 5,6,8—
EUROCONTROL
• SESAR P15.2.7 Profiles Definition
for AeroMACS
• Chap 8—Physical Layer—Updates
per WiMAX Forum
• Chap 5—Service Specific CS
• Chap 6—Media Access Control
December 7, 2011
• MOPS WG Breakout Session
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
• Discussion of Security Sub-layer—
Honeywell
• Review draft of Environmental
(DO–160G)—Rockwell Collins
• Review draft PICS—EUROCAE
(Thales)
• Review draft CSRL Appendix—
Rockwell Collins
• MOPS Schedule/Logistics—
Rockwell Collins
• Wednesday Afternoon—Reconvene
Plenary:
• Discuss Work Program for 2012
• Establish Agenda, Date and Place
for RTCA plenary meetings #13 and
#14
• Review of Meeting summary report
• Adjourn—Expected by 15:00
• Review all action items
• Adjourn
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairman,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting. Persons
wishing to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
17, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
Manager, Business Operations Group, Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–30497 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2000–7257; Notice No. 68]
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee
(RSAC); Working Group Activity
Update
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Announcement of Railroad
Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
Working Group activities.
AGENCY:
The FRA is updating its
announcement of RSAC’s Working
Group activities to reflect its current
status.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Woolverton, RSAC Designated
Federal Officer/Administrative Officer,
FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 493–6212; or Robert Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations,
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72997
FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 493–6474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice serves to update FRA’s last
announcement of working group
activities and status reports of December
7, 2010 (75 FR 76070). The 44th full
RSAC meeting was held May 20, 2011,
and the 45th meeting is scheduled for
December 8, 2011, at the National
Association of Home Builders, National
Housing Center, located at 1201 15th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Since its first meeting in April of
1996, the RSAC has accepted 36 tasks.
Status for each of the open tasks (neither
completed nor terminated) is provided
below:
Open Tasks
Task 96–4—Tourist and Historic
Railroads. Reviewing the
appropriateness of the agency’s current
policy regarding the applicability of
existing and proposed regulations to
tourist, excursion, scenic, and historic
railroads. This task was accepted on
April 2, 1996, and a working group was
established. The working group
monitored the steam locomotive
regulation task. Planned future activities
involve the review of other regulations
for possible adaptation to the safety
needs of tourist and historic railroads.
Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493–6474.
Task 03–01—Passenger Safety. This
task includes updating and enhancing
the regulations pertaining to passenger
safety, based on research and
experience. This task was accepted on
May 20, 2003, and a working group was
established. Prior to embarking on
substantive discussions of a specific
task, the working group set forth in
writing a specific description of the
task. The working group reports
planned activity to the full RSAC at
each scheduled full RSAC meeting,
including milestones for completion of
projects and progress toward
completion. At the first meeting held on
September 9–10, 2003, a consolidated
list of issues was completed. At the
second meeting, held on November 6–
7, 2003, four task groups were
established: Emergency Preparedness,
Mechanical, Crashworthiness, and
Track/Vehicle Interaction. The task
forces met and reported on activities for
working group consideration at the third
meeting, held on May 11–12, 2004, and
a fourth meeting was held October 26–
27, 2004. The working group met on
March 21–22, 2006, and again on
September 12–13, 2006, at which time
the group agreed to establish a task force
on General Passenger Safety. The full
Passenger Safety Working Group met on
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
72998
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
April 17–18, 2007; December 11–12,
2007; November 13, 2008; and June 8,
2009. On August 5, 2009, the working
group was requested to establish an
Engineering Task Force (ETF) to
consider technical criteria and
procedures for qualifying alternative
passenger equipment designs as
equivalent in safety to equipment
meeting the design standards in the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards.
The working group met last on
September 16, 2010, and no additional
meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Charles Bielitz, (202) 493–6314.
Engineering Task Force. The
Passenger Safety Working Group
approved a request from FRA to
establish an ETF under the Passenger
Safety Working Group in August 2009.
The mission of the task force is to
produce a set of technical evaluation
criteria and procedures for passenger
rail equipment built to alternative
designs. The technical evaluation
criteria and procedures would provide a
means of establishing whether an
alternative design would result in
performance at least equal to the
structural design standards set forth in
the Passenger Equipment Safety
Standards (Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 238). The initial
focus of this effort will be on Tier I
standards. When completed, the criteria
and procedures would form a technical
basis for making determinations
concerning equivalent safety pursuant
to 49 CFR Section 238.201, and provide
a technical framework for presenting
evidence to FRA in support of any
request for waiver of the compressive
(buff) strength requirement, as set forth
in 49 CFR 238.203. See 49 CFR part 211,
Rules of Practice. The criteria and
procedures could be incorporated into
Part 238 at a later date after notice and
opportunity for public comment. The
ETF was formed and a kickoff meeting
was held on September 23–24, 2009.
The group held follow-on meetings
November 3–4, 2009; January 7–8, 2010;
and March 9–10, 2010. A followup
GoTo/Webinar meeting was held on July
12, 2010. The ETF developed a draft
‘‘Criteria and Procedures Report,’’ that
was approved by the Passenger Safety
Working Group during the September
16, 2010, meeting and by the RSAC
Committee during the September 23,
2010, meeting. The document has been
placed on the FRA Web site at the
following address: https://
www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/
RSAC_REPORT-%209–16–10.pdf.
Engineering Task Force II. To build on
the success of the ETF in developing a
set of alternative technical criteria and
procedures for evaluating the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
crashworthiness and occupant
protection performance of passenger rail
equipment in service at conventional
operating speeds, the FRA requested
that the Passenger Safety Working
Group re-task the group to concentrate
on developing crashworthiness and
occupant protection safety
recommendations for high-speed
passenger trains. The Passenger Safety
Working Group accepted the task on
July 28, 2010, by electronic vote. Under
the new task, the task force may address
any safety features of the equipment,
including but not limited to
crashworthiness, interior occupant
protection, glazing, emergency egress,
and fire safety features. Any type of
equipment may be addressed, including
conventional locomotives, high-speed
power cars, cab cars, multiple-unit (MU)
locomotives, and coach cars. The
equipment addressed may be used in
any type of passenger service, from
conventional-speed to high-speed.
Recommendations may take the form of
criteria and procedures, revisions to
existing regulations, or adoption of new
regulations, including rules of particular
applicability. The work of the re-tasked
ETF is intended to assist FRA in
developing appropriate safety standards
for the high-speed rail projects planned
for California. The Engineering Task
Force II held a kickoff meeting on
October 21–22, 2010, to begin work on
the new high-speed task, and had
follow-on meetings on January 11–12,
2011, February 14–15 2011, March 30–
31, 2011, and June 16–17, 2011.
Consensus Tier III recommendations of
the ETF have been developed and were
accepted by vote during a scheduled
meeting on October 6–7, 2011. The ETF
II has formed two additional Task
Groups to work in the areas of track
worthiness and brakes. The Track
worthiness Task Group is tasked to
identify potential safety issues related to
operation of high-speed train sets on
conventional track and to make
recommendations on how best to
mitigate any consequences. The Task
Group includes experts and key
stakeholders such as international
operators of high-speed equipment, car
builders, wheel/rail interaction
dynamics specialists, and other RSAC
working group members involved in
vehicle/track interaction. The Brakes
Task Group is tasked to review braking
system requirements and international
braking system requirements verses
existing U.S. requirements including
inspection and maintenance and
identify common features, determine
basic parameters and consider use of
service proven braking systems. The
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Task Group will also consider
performance based provisions/
requirements with consideration for
operator’s to develop maintenance,
inspection, and service plans and make
recommendations regarding brakes to
the ETF II as related to Tier III. Contact:
Robert Lauby, (202) 493–6474.
Emergency Preparedness Task Force.
At the working group meeting on March
9–10, 2005, the working group received
and approved the consensus report of
the Emergency Preparedness Task Force
related to emergency communication,
emergency egress, and rescue access.
These recommendations were presented
to and approved by the full RSAC on
May 18, 2005. The working group met
on September 7–8, 2005, and additional,
supplementary recommendations were
presented to and accepted by the full
RSAC on October 11, 2005. The Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was
published on August 24, 2006 (71 FR
50275), and was open for comment until
October 23, 2006. The working group
agreed upon recommendations for the
final rule, including resolution of final
comments received, during the April
17–18, 2007, meeting. The
recommendations were presented to and
approved by the full RSAC on June 26,
2007. The Passenger Train Emergency
Systems final rule, focusing on
emergency communication, emergency
egress, and rescue access, was published
on February 1, 2008 (73 FR 6370). The
task force met on October 17–18, 2007,
and reached consensus on the draft rule
text for a followup NPRM on Passenger
Train Emergency Systems, focusing on
low location emergency exit path
marking, emergency lighting, and
emergency signage. The task force
presented the draft rule text to the
Passenger Safety Working Group on
December 11–12, 2007, and the
consensus draft rule text was presented
to, and approved by full RSAC vote
during the February 20, 2008, meeting.
During the May 13–14, 2008, meeting,
the task force recommended clarifying
the applicability of back-up emergency
communication system requirements in
the February 1, 2008, final rule, and
FRA announced its intention to exercise
limited enforcement discretion for a
new provision amending instruction
requirements for emergency window
exit removal. The working group ratified
these recommendations on June 19,
2008. The task force met again on March
31, 2009, to clarify issues related to the
followup NPRM raised by members. The
modified rule text was presented to and
approved by the Passenger Safety
Working Group on June 8, 2009. The
working group requested that FRA draft
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
the rule text requiring daily inspection
of removable panels or windows in
vestibule doors and entrust the
Emergency Preparedness Task Force
with reviewing the text. FRA sent the
draft text to the task force for review and
comment on August 4, 2009. The draft
rule text was approved by the Passenger
Safety Working Group by mail ballot on
December 23, 2009. The target
timeframe for the NPRM publication has
been pushed back to November 2012
due to competing Rail Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA)
priorities. No additional task force
meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Brenda Moscoso, (202) 493–
6282.
Mechanical Task Force—Completed.
Initial recommendations on mechanical
issues (revisions to 49 CFR Part 238)
were approved by the full RSAC on
January 26, 2005. At the working group
meeting of September 7–8, 2005, the
task force presented additional
perfecting amendments and the full
RSAC approved them on October 11,
2005. An NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on December 8, 2005
(70 FR 73070). Public comments were
due by February 17, 2006. The final rule
was published in the Federal Register
on October 19, 2006 (71 FR 61835),
effective December 18, 2006.
Crashworthiness Task Force—
Completed. Among its efforts, the
Crashworthiness Task Force provided
consensus recommendations on staticend strength that were adopted by the
working group on September 7–8, 2005.
The full RSAC accepted the
recommendations on October 11, 2005.
The front-end strength of cab cars and
MU locomotives NPRM was published
in the Federal Register on August 1,
2007 (72 FR 42016), with comments due
by October 1, 2007. A number of
comments were entered into the docket,
and a Crashworthiness Task Force
meeting was held September 9, 2008, to
resolve comments on the NPRM. Based
on the consensus language agreed to at
the meeting, FRA has prepared the text
of the final rule incorporating the
resolutions made at the task force
meeting and the final rule language was
adopted at the Passenger Safety Working
Group meeting held on November 13,
2008. The language was presented and
approved at the December 10, 2008, full
RSAC meeting. The final rule was
issued on December 31, 2009, and
published on January 8, 2010 (75 FR
1180). Contact: Gary Fairbanks, (202)
493–6322.
Vehicle/Track Interaction Task Force.
The task force is developing proposed
revisions to 49 CFR Parts 213 and 238,
principally regarding high-speed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
passenger service. The task force met on
October 9–11, 2007, and again on
November 19–20, 2007, in Washington,
DC, and presented the final task force
report and final recommendations and
proposed rule text for approval by the
Passenger Safety Working Group at the
December 11–12, 2007, meeting. The
final report and the proposed rule text
were approved by the working group
and were presented to and approved by
full RSAC vote during the February 20,
2008, meeting. The group met on
February 27–28, 2008, and by
teleconference on March 18, 2010, to
address unresolved issues, and the
NPRM was published on May 10, 2010
(75 FR 25928). The task force was called
back into session on August 5–6, 2010,
to review and consider NPRM
comments. The final rule will amend
the Track Safety Standards and
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards
for high-speed train operations and train
operations at high cant deficiencies to
promote the safe interaction of rail
vehicles with the track over which they
operate. It will revise both the safety
limits for these operations and the
process to qualify them. It accounts for
a range of vehicle types that are
currently used and may likely be used
on future high-speed or high cant
deficiency rail operations, and would
provide safety assurance for train
operations in all classes of track. It is
based on the results of simulation
studies designed to identify track
geometry irregularities associated with
unsafe wheel forces and acceleration,
thorough reviews of vehicle
qualification and revenue service test
data, and consideration of international
practices. The draft final rule was sent
to the task force for final consensus on
November 11, 2011. The target date set
for the final rule is April 2012. Contact:
John Mardente, (202) 493–1335.
General Passenger Safety Task Force.
At the Passenger Safety Working Group
meeting on April 17–18, 2007, the task
force presented a progress report to the
working group. The task force met on
July 18–19, 2007, and afterwards it
reported proposed reporting cause codes
for injuries involving the platform gap,
which were approved by the Working
Group by mail ballot in September 2007.
The full RSAC approved the
recommendations for changes to 49 CFR
Part 225 accident/incident cause codes
on October 25, 2007. The General
Passenger Safety Task Force presented
draft guidance material for management
of the gap that was considered and
approved by the Working Group during
the December 11–12, 2007, meeting and
was presented to and approved by full
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72999
RSAC vote during the February 20,
2008, meeting. The group met April 23–
24, 2008, December 3–4, 2008, April 21–
23, 2009, October 7–8, 2009, and July
30, 2010 by GoTo/Webinar
teleconference. The task force continues
work on passenger train door
securement, ‘‘second train in station,’’
trespasser incidents, and System Safetybased solutions by developing a
regulatory approach to System Safety.
The task force has created two task
groups to focus on these issues.
The Door Safety Task Group has
reached consensus on 47 out of 48
safety issues and had five items that
have been remanded to the task force for
vote. The issues are addressed in the
area of passenger train door mechanical
and operational requirements and
presented draft regulatory language to
the Passenger Safety Working Group at
the September 16, 2010, meeting. More
work remains to ensure the 49 CFR Part
238 door rule consensus document and
the proposed American Public Transit
Association (APTA) door standard
(APTA SS–M–18–10) use uniform
language. The document was approved
by the Passenger Safety Working Group
by electronic vote on March 31, 2011,
and approved by the RSAC on May 20,
2011. This rulemaking would amend the
passenger equipment safety standards to
enhance safety standards as they relate
to passenger door securement while a
passenger train is in service based on
research and experiences of FRA safety
inspectors. Specifically, FRA would
incorporate by reference APTA
standard: ‘‘APTA SS–M–18–10
Standard for Powered Exterior Side
Door System Design for New Passenger
Cars.’’ A draft NPRM is currently under
development with a target publication
date of May 2012. No additional Door
Task Group meetings are currently
scheduled. Contact: Brian Hontz, (610)
521–8220.
The System Safety Task Group has
produced draft regulatory language for a
System Safety Rule, but further work on
this rulemaking is delayed until a study
of legal protections for Risk Reduction
Program (RRP) and System Safety
Program (SSP) risk analysis data that is
required by the RSIA is complete. The
legal study is expected to be complete
by December 2012. The System Safety
rulemaking would improve passenger
railroad safety through structured,
proactive processes and procedures
developed by passenger railroad
operators. It would require passenger
railroads to establish an SSP that would
systematically evaluate and manage
risks in order to reduce the number and
rates of railroad accidents, incidents,
injuries, and fatalities. The target date
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73000
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
for NPRM publication is May 2012. No
additional System Safety Task Group
meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Dan Knote, (631) 567–1596.
Task 05–01—Review of Roadway
Worker Protection Issues. This task was
accepted on January 26, 2005, to review
49 CFR part 214, Subpart C, Roadway
Worker Protection (RWP), and related
sections of Subpart A; to recommend
consideration of specific actions to
advance the on-track safety of railroad
employees and contractors engaged in
maintenance-of-way activities
throughout the general system of
railroad transportation, including
clarification of existing requirements. A
working group was established and
reported to the RSAC any specific
actions identified as appropriate. The
first meeting of the working group was
held on April 12–14, 2005. Over the
course of 2 years, the group drafted and
reached consensus on regulatory
language for various revisions,
clarifications, and additions to 32
separate items in 19 sections of the rule.
However, two parties raised technical
concerns regarding one of those items,
namely, the draft language concerning
electronic display of track authorities.
The working group presented and
received approval on all of its consensus
recommendations for draft rule text to
the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
meeting. FRA will address the
electronic display of track authorities
issue, along with eight additional items
that the working group was unable to
reach consensus, through the traditional
NPRM process. In early 2008, the
external working group members were
solicited to review the consensus rule
text for errata review. In order to
address the heightened concerns raised
with the current regulations for
adjacent-track, on-track safety, FRA
decided to issue, on an accelerated
basis, a separate NPRM that would focus
on this element of the RWP rule alone.
An NPRM with an abbreviated comment
period regarding adjacent-track, on-track
safety was published on July 17, 2008,
but was later withdrawn on August 13,
2008, to permit further consideration of
the RSAC consensus language. A second
NPRM concerning adjacent-controlledtrack, on-track safety was published on
November 25, 2009, and comments were
due to the docket by January 25, 2010.
Comments have been reviewed and
considered by FRA, and the target
publication date for the final rule is
November 2011. Due to the ongoing
work of this separate rulemaking, the
remaining larger NPRM relating to the
various revisions, clarifications, and
additions to 31 separate items in 19
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
sections of the rule, and FRA’s
recommendations for nine
nonconsensus items is now planned for
early 2012. Contact: Joe Riley, (202)
493–6357.
Task 05–02—Reduce Human FactorCaused Train Accident/Incidents. This
task was accepted on May 18, 2005, to
reduce the number of human factorcaused train accidents/incidents and
related employee injuries. The Railroad
Operating Rules Working Group was
formed, and the working group
extensively reviewed the issues
presented. The final working group
meeting devoted to developing a
proposed rule was held February 8–9,
2006. The working group was not able
to deliver a consensus regulatory
proposal, but it did recommend that it
be used to review comments on FRA’s
NPRM, which was published in the
Federal Register on October 12, 2006
(FR 71 60372), with public comments
due by December 11, 2006. Two reviews
were held, one on February 8–9, 2007,
and one on April 4–5, 2007. Consensus
was reached on four items and those
items were presented and accepted by
the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
meeting. A final rule was published in
the Federal Register on February 13,
2008 (73 FR 8442), with an effective
date of April 14, 2008. FRA received
four petitions for reconsideration of that
final rule. The final rule that responded
to the petitions for consideration was
published in the Federal Register on
June 16, 2008, and concluded the
rulemaking. Working group meetings
were held September 27–28, 2007;
January 17–18, 2008; May 21–22, 2008;
and September 25–26, 2008. The
working group has considered issues
related to issuance of Emergency Order
No. 26 (prohibition on use of certain
electronic devices while on duty), and
‘‘after arrival mandatory directives,’’
among other issues. The working group
continues to work on after arrival
orders, and at the September 25–26,
2008, meeting voted to create a
Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Task
Force to review highway-rail grade
crossing accident reports regarding
incidents of grade crossing warning
systems providing ‘‘short or no
warning’’ resulting from or contributed
to ‘‘by train operational issues’’ with the
intent to recommend new accident/
incident reporting codes that would
better explain such events, and which
may provide information for remedial
action going forward. A followup task is
to review and provide recommendations
regarding supplementary reporting of
train operations-related, no-warning or
short-warning incidents that are not
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
technically warning system activation
failures, but that result in an accident/
incident or a near miss. The task force
has been formed and will begin work
after other RSIA priorities are met.
Contact: Douglas Taylor, (202) 493–
6255.
Task 06–01—Locomotive Safety
Standards. This task was accepted on
February 22, 2006, to review 49 CFR
part 229, Railroad Locomotive Safety
Standards, and revise as appropriate. A
working group was established with the
mandate to report any planned activity
to the full Committee at each scheduled
full RSAC meeting, to include
milestones for completion of projects
and progress toward completion. The
first working group meeting was held
May 8–10, 2006. Working group
meetings were held on August 8–9,
2006; September 25–26, 2006; October
30–31, 2006; and the working group
presented recommendations regarding
revisions to requirements for locomotive
sanders to the full RSAC on September
21, 2006. The NPRM regarding sanders
was published in the Federal Register
on March 6, 2007 (72 FR 9904).
Comments received were discussed by
the working group for clarification, and
FRA published a final rule on October
19, 2007 (72 FR 59216). The working
group met on January 9–10, 2007;
November 27–28, 2007; February 5–6,
2008; May 20–21, 2008; August 5–6,
2008; October 22–23, 2008; January 6–
7, 2009; and April 15–16, 2009. The
working group has now completed the
review of 49 CFR Part 229 and was
unable to reach consensus regarding
locomotive cab temperature standards,
locomotive alerters, and remote control
locomotives. The group reached
consensus regarding critical locomotive
electronic standards, updated annual/
biennial air brake standards,
clarification of the ‘‘air brakes operate as
intended’’ requirement, locomotive pilot
clearance within hump classification
yards, clarification of the ‘‘high voltage’’
warning requirement, an update of
‘‘headlight lamp’’ requirements, and
language to allow locomotive records to
be stored electronically. The working
group presented a draft 49 CFR part 229
rule text revision covering these items to
the RSAC for consideration at the
September 10, 2009, meeting and
received approval. The NPRM was
delayed due to competing RSIA
priorities and the need for additional
language. The NPRM was published on
January 12, 2011 (76 FR 2200), and the
final rule is scheduled to be published
in December 2011. This rulemaking
would amend the rules pertaining to the
Locomotive Safety Standards. The
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
proposed amendments would update,
consolidate, and clarify existing rules,
and adopt existing industry and
engineering best practices. The
proposed amendments include:
Updating locomotive inspection
recordkeeping requirements by
permitting electronic records;
consolidating locomotive air brake
maintenance into a single provision;
clarifying locomotive headlight
requirements to address new
technology; and establishing locomotive
electronics standards based on existing
industry and engineering best practices,
as well as other existing Federal
electronics standards. This action is
taken by FRA in an effort to improve its
safety regulator program. The working
group may be called back to address
comments received on the final rule
after publication. Contact: Steve Clay,
(202) 493–6259.
Task 06–03—Medical Standards for
Safety-Critical Personnel. This task was
accepted on September 21, 2006, to
enhance the safety of persons in the
railroad operating environment and the
public by establishing standards and
procedures for determining the medical
fitness for duty of personnel engaged in
safety-critical functions. A working
group was established by the full RSAC
and reports its activities and progress
toward completion of this task to the
full RSAC during each meeting of the
full RSAC. The first working group
meeting was held December 12–13,
2006, and the working group has held
follow-on meetings on February 20–21,
2007; July 24–25, 2007; August 29–30,
2007; October 31–November 1, 2007;
December 4–5, 2007; February 13–14,
2008; March 26–27, 2008; April 22–23,
2008; December 8–9, 2009; February 16–
17, 2010; March 11–12, 2010; May 24–
26, 2010; August 31–September 1, 2010;
November 18–19, 2010; February 16–17,
2010; March 11–12, 2010; May 24–26,
2010; August 31–September 1, 2010;
November 18–19, 2010; and September
27–28, 2011. During the working
group’s September 2011 meeting, the
working group discussed stakeholder
positions on the draft rule text and draft
medical qualification criteria and
protocols, and a preliminary cost-benefit
analysis was presented to the working
group by the FRA economist. The
working group tentatively agreed to
proceed to revise its draft
recommendations to include a proposed
option that the medical qualification
criteria be issued as medical
qualification guidelines rather than
standards. The working group
established a task force to draft
proposed revisions to working draft
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
documents to be presented to the
working group for review and comment.
The next working group meeting is
scheduled to be held February 1–2,
2012, in Washington, DC. Contact: Dr.
Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Physicians Task Force. A Physicians
Task Force was established by the
working group in May 2007, and tasked
to draft recommended medical
qualification criteria and protocols for
locomotive engineers and conductors.
The Physicians Task Force has had
meetings or conference calls on July 24,
2007; August 20, 2007; October 15,
2007; October 31, 2007; June 23–24,
2008; September 8–10, 2008; October 8,
2008; November 12–13, 2008; December
8–10, 2008; January 27–28, 2009;
February 24–25, 2009; March 11–12,
2009; March 31–April 1, 2009; April 15,
2009; April 22, 2009; May 13, 2009; May
20, 2009; June 17, 2009; January 21–22,
2010; March 3, 2010; August 16–17,
2010; and October 25–26, 2010;
December 17, 2010; January 11, 2011;
March 3–4, 2011; May 16–17, 2011;
August 18, 2011; August 25, 2011;
August 31, 2011. On September 1, 2011,
the task force notified working group
members that it had made significant
progress in completing its task and
requested that the working group
participate in clarifying a limited
number of remaining operational issues
relevant to the task that merited review
by industry management, labor, and
other stakeholders. No further meetings
of the Physicians Task Force are
currently scheduled. Contact: Dr.
Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Critical Incident Task Force. The
Medical Standards Working Group
accepted RSAC Task 2009–02, Critical
Incident Response, during the December
8–9, 2010, meeting. The working group
has been tasked to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for critical incident stress
plans as required by the RSIA. A Critical
Incident Task Force was established by
the working group during the May 24–
26, 2010, Medical Standards Working
Group meeting. The scheduled kickoff
meeting for the Critical Incident Task
Force scheduled for September 2, 2010,
was postponed at the request of industry
participants. In late March 2011, FRA
leadership decided to request that the
RSAC be asked to amend the Critical
Incident task statement to remove
reference to the Medical Standards
Working Group and to allow the group
to assume full working group status to
expedite the work. The Committee
approved the revised task statement
with a target date for recommendations
to the Committee of December 2011 and
the task force transitioned to the Critical
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73001
Incident Working Group. (See Critical
Incident Working Group entry.) Contact:
Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493–6002.
Task 07–01—Track Safety Standards.
This task was accepted on February 22,
2007, to consider specific improvements
to the Track Safety Standards or other
responsive actions, supplementing work
already underway on continuous
welded rail (CWR) specifically to:
Review controls applied to the re-use of
rail in CWR ‘‘plug rail’’; review the issue
of cracks emanating from bond wire
attachments; consider improvements in
the Track Safety Standards related to
fastening of rail to concrete ties; and
ensure a common understanding within
the regulated community concerning
requirements for internal rail flaw
inspections. The tasks were assigned to
the Track Safety Standards Working
Group. The working group will report
any planned activity to the full
Committee at each scheduled full RSAC
meeting, including milestones for
completion of projects and progress
toward completion. The first working
group meeting was held on June 27–28,
2007, and the group met again on
August 15–16, 2007, and October 23–24,
2007. Two task forces were created
under the working group: Concrete Ties
Task Force and Rail Integrity Task
Force. The Concrete Ties Task Force
met on November 26–27, 2007; February
13–14, 2008; April 16–17, 2008; July 9–
10, 2008; and September 17–18, 2008.
The Concrete Ties Task Force finalized
consensus language regarding concrete
crossties (49 CFR Part 213) and
presented a recommendation to the
Track Standards Working Group at the
November 20, 2008, working group
meeting. The language was approved by
both the working group and the
December 10, 2008, RSAC meeting and
the task force was dissolved. The
Concrete Crossties NPRM was published
on August 26, 2010 (75 FR 52490). The
Track Standards Working Group met on
October 26–27, 2010, to discuss the
outstanding issue of plug rail. The
working group reached consensus on
regulatory language regarding the reuse
of plug rail and the consensus language
was presented to and approved by the
RSAC Committee during the December
14, 2010 meeting. RSAC Task 07–01
will be complete once the final rule is
issued. Contact: Carlo Patrick, (202)
493–6399.
Task 08–03—Track Safety Standards
Rail Integrity. This task was accepted on
September 10, 2008, to consider specific
improvements to the Track Safety
Standards or other responsive actions
designed to enhance rail integrity. The
Rail Integrity Task Force was created in
October 2007 under Task 07–01 and
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73002
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
first met on November 28–29, 2007. The
task force met on February 12–13, 2008;
April 15–16, 2008; July 8–9, 2008;
September 16–17, 2008; February 3–4,
2009; June 16–17, 2009; October 29–30,
2009; January 20–21, 2010; March 9–11,
2010; and April 20, 2010. Consensus has
been achieved on bond wires and a
common understanding on internal rail
flaw inspections has been reached. The
task force has reached consensus to
recommend to the working group that
the item regarding ‘‘the effect of rail
head wear, surface conditions and other
relevant factors on the acquisition and
interpretation of internal rail flaw test
results’’ be closed. The task force does
not recommend regulatory action
concerning head wear. Surface
conditions and their effect on test
integrity has been discussed and
understood during dialogue concerning
common understanding on internal rail
flaw inspections. The task force believes
that new technology has been developed
that improves test performance and will
impact the effect of head wear and
surface conditions on interpretation of
internal rail flaw test results. Consensus
text was developed on recommended
changes that would approach a
performance-based approach to flaw
detection scheduling. However, the
group did not reach consensus on what
length of segment of track is practical to
use on determining test cycles.
Consensus text has been finalized for
recommended changes to 49 CFR
213.113, Defective rails; 213.237, Rail
inspection; and 213.241, Inspection
records. The task force has developed a
new 49 CFR 213.238, Qualified operator
language, that defines the minimum
requirements for the training of a rail
flaw detector car operator. The task
force presented the consensus language
to the Track Standards Working Group
during the July 28–30, 2010, meeting
and the Track Standards Working Group
presented its consensus
recommendations to the RSAC
Committee for approval during the
September 23, 2010, Committee
meeting. By majority vote, the RSAC
accepted the recommendations of the
Track Standards Working Group and
forwarded those recommendations to
the Administrator completing RSAC
Task 08–03. The associated NPRM is
currently in development and RSAC
Task 08–03 will be complete once the
final rule is issued. Contact: Carlo
Patrick, (202) 493–6399.
Task No. 08–04—Positive Train
Control. This task was accepted on
December 10, 2008, to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for Positive Train Control
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
(PTC) systems and their deployment
under the RSIA. The task included a
requirement to convene an initial
meeting no later than January 2009, and
to report recommendations back to
RSAC no later than April 24, 2009. The
PTC Working Group was created in
December 2008 by working group
member nominations from committee
member organizations under Task 08–04
and the kickoff meeting was held on
January 26–27, 2009. The group met
again on February 11–13, 25–27; March
17–18, 2009; and March 31–April 1,
2009. On April 2, 2009, the RSAC
approved the request by the working
group for agreement to vote on the draft
rule text recommendations from the
working group by mail ballot. On May
11, 2009, by majority vote via mail
ballot, the RSAC accepted the
recommendations of the PTC Working
Group and forwarded those
recommendations to the Administrator,
with the understanding that there are
other issues that FRA would be making
proposals with respect to their
resolution. The NPRM was published on
July 21, 2009 (74 FR 36152), with
comments due by August 20, 2009. In
addition, a public hearing was held on
August 13, 2009 (74 FR 36152). The PTC
Working Group was reconvened on
August 31–September 2, 2009, to
discuss comments received on the
NPRM and the PTC Working Group
presented consensus rule text items to
the RSAC for approval at the September
10, 2009, meeting. The PTC consensus
rule text was approved by majority
RSAC vote by electronic ballot on
September 24, 2009, and the final rule
was published on January 15, 2010 (75
FR 2598). Final rule amendments were
published on September 27, 2010 (75 FR
59108). An NPRM proposing
amendments to the PTC Final Rule that
would remove various regulatory
requirements that require railroads to
either conduct further analyses or meet
certain risk-based criteria in order to
avoid PTC system implementation on
track segments that do not transport
poison- or toxic-by-inhalation
hazardous materials traffic, and are not
used for intercity or commuter rail
passenger transportation, as of
December 31, 2015, was published on
August 24, 2011 (76 FR 52918) with
comments due by October 24, 2011. The
PTC Working Group met on October 21,
2011, to provide input for an additional
NPRM intended to address further rule
considerations. FRA did not seek
consensus from the RSAC or PTC
Working Group on the substance of this
NPRM, but requested the working
group’s valued assistance and input in
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
its development. No additional meetings
are scheduled at this time. Contact: Tom
McFarlin, (202) 493–6203.
PTC Implementation Plan Task Force.
A task force was formed to assist FRA
in developing a model template for a
successful PTC Implementation Plan
(PTCIP), and in development of an
example associated Risk Prioritization
Methodology. PTCIPs are required to be
submitted by April 16, 2010, under the
mandate of the RSIA. FRA posted a final
version of a PTCIP template and an
example risk prioritization methodology
model for prioritization of line segment
implementation to the FRA public Web
site on January 12, 2010, the same day
the final rule was made available for
public review. No further meetings of
this task force are currently scheduled.
Contact: Tom McFarlin, (202) 493–6203.
PTC Risk Evaluation Task Force. The
creation of the PTC Risk Evaluation
Task Force was approved by the PTC
Working Group on April 1, 2010, to
develop a computer model to estimate
the risk of PTC-preventable accidents on
a line segment basis. The group was
formed by nominations from members
of the PTC Working Group and the
kickoff meeting was held via GoTo/
Webinar on June 17, 2010. A followup
meeting was held on August 3, 2010,
and an additional followup GoTo/
Webinar meeting was held on
September 7, 2010. No additional
meetings are scheduled at this time.
Contact: Mark Hartong, (202) 493–1332.
Task No. 08–07—Conductor
Certification. This task was accepted on
December 10, 2008, to develop
regulations for certification of railroad
conductors, as required by the RSIA,
and to consider any appropriate related
amendments to existing regulations and
report recommendations for proposed or
interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with the Office of
the Secretary of Transportation and the
Office of Management and Budget) by
October 16, 2009. The Conductor
Certification Working Group was
officially formed by nominations from
member organizations in April 2009,
and the first meeting was held on July
21–23, 2009. Additional meetings were
held on August 25–27, 2009; September
15–17, 2009; October 20–22, 2009;
November 17–19, 2009; and December
16–18, 2009. Tentative consensus was
reached on the vast majority of the
regulatory text. The working group
approved the draft rule text by
electronic ballot and the consensus draft
language was approved by the RSAC on
March 18, 2010, by unanimous vote as
the recommendation from the
Committee to the FRA Administrator.
The resulting NPRM was published in
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
the Federal Register on November 10,
2010 (75 FR 69166) and the working
group was called back to meet and
review comments received on May 12,
2011, and the final rule is currently
under development with a target
publication date of November 2012.
This rulemaking would provide rules
and guidance for requisite train
conductor certification to ensure that
individuals have the knowledge and
skills necessary to perform the duties of
a train conductor. This rulemaking may
propose that each railroad adopt and
comply with a written program for
certifying and recertifying the
qualifications of conductors. After the
final rule is published, the working
group will reconvene to make
conforming amendments to the
locomotive engineer certification
regulation as appropriate. Contact: Mark
McKeon, (202) 493–6350.
Task No. 09—01—Passenger Hours of
Service. This task was accepted on April
2, 2009, to provide advice regarding
development of implementing
regulations for the hours of service of
operating employees of commuter and
intercity passenger railroads under the
RSIA. The group has been tasked to
review available data concerning the
effects of fatigue on the performance of
subject employees and consider the role
of fatigue prevention in determining
maximum hours of service. The group
has also been tasked to consider the
potential for alternative approaches to
hours of service using available tools for
evaluating the impact of various crew
schedules and determine the effect of
alternative approaches on the
availability of employees to support
passenger service. The group is charged
to report whether existing hours of
service restrictions are effective in
preventing fatigue among subject
employees, whether an alternative
approach to hours of service for the
subject employees would enhance safety
and whether alternative restrictions on
hours of service could be coupled with
other fatigue countermeasures to
promote the fitness of employees for
safety-critical duties. The Passenger
Hours of Service Working Group was
officially formed through the formal
Committee member nomination process
in May 2009, and the first meeting was
held on June 24, 2009. Followup
working group meetings were held on
February 2–3, 2010; March 4–5, 2010;
April 6, 2010; May 20, 2010; and June
29, 2010. Consensus has been reached
on a majority of the issues and the draft
rule text has been matured. A Passenger
Hours of Service Task Force was formed
to review collected data and provide
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
recommendations to the working group.
The task force met on January 14–15,
2010; March 30–31, 2010; and June 16,
2010. The working group approved the
draft rule text by electronic ballot on
September 22, 2010, and the consensus
draft language was approved by the
RSAC on October 15, 2010, by
unanimous electronic vote as the
recommendation from the Committee to
the FRA Administrator. The working
group met on December 9, 2010, to
discuss the approved consensus
language and the NPRM preamble and
the resulting NPRM was published on
March 22, 2011 (76 FR 16200), and the
final rule was published on August 12,
2011 (76 FR 50360), with an effective
date of October 15, 2011. Contact: Mark
McKeon, (202) 493–6350.
Task No. 09–02—Critical Incident
Programs. This task was accepted on
September 10, 2009, to provide advice
regarding development of implementing
regulations for Critical Incident Stress
Plans as required by the RSIA. The
group has been tasked to define what a
‘‘critical incident’’ is that requires a
response; review available data,
literature, and standards of practice
concerning critical incident programs to
determine appropriate action when a
railroad employee is involved in or
directly witnesses a critical incident;
review any evaluation studies available
for existing railroad critical incident
programs; describe program elements
appropriate for the rail environment,
including those requirements set forth
in the RSIA; provide an example of a
suitable plan (template); and assist in
the preparation of an NPRM no later
than December 2010. In late March
2011, FRA leadership decided to request
that the RSAC be asked to amend the
Critical Incident task statement to
remove reference to the Medical
Standards Working Group and to allow
the group to assume full working group
status to expedite the work. The
Committee approved the revised task
statement with a target date for
recommendations to the Committee of
December 2011. The Critical Incident
Working Group kickoff meeting was
held on June 24, 2011. The draft report
assessing current knowledge of posttraumatic interventions and to advance
evidence-based recommendations for
controlling the risks associated with
traumatic exposure in the railroad
setting was completed and distributed
to the working group prior to the
September 8–9, 2011, working group
meeting. Due to the aggressive timeline,
the working group held its second
meeting on October 11–12, 2011 with a
follow-on meeting scheduled for
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73003
December 13–14, 2011. Contact: Ron
Hynes, (202) 493–6404.
Task No. 10–01—Minimum Training
Standards and Plans. This task was
accepted on March 18, 2010, to establish
minimum training standards for each
class and craft of safety-related railroad
employee and their railroad contractor
and subcontractor equivalents, as
required by RSIA. The group has been
tasked to assist FRA in developing
regulations responsive to the legislative
mandate, while ensuring generally
accepted principles of adult learning are
employed in training and development
and delivery; determine a reasonable
method for submission and FRA review
of training plans which takes human
resource limitations into account;
establish reasonable oversight criteria to
ensure training plans are effective, using
the operational tests and inspections
requirements of 49 CFR Part 217 as a
model. The Training Standards Working
Group was officially formed through the
formal Committee member nomination
process in March 2010, and the first
meeting was held on April 13–14, 2010.
A followup working group meeting was
held on June 2–3, 2010, and additional
followup meetings were scheduled for
August 17–18 and September 21–22,
2010. A Task Analysis Task Force was
formed under the working group to
develop a task analysis template and
met in Florence, KY, on June 22–23,
2010, with CSX Transportation hosting
the event. The group developed a 21page task analysis document for an
outbound train yard carman position,
which is complete regarding FRA
railroad safety laws, regulations, and
orders. The working group met August
17–18, and October 19–20, 2010, and by
GoTo/Webinar on November 15–16,
2010. The working group reached
consensus and the resulting training
standards draft regulatory language was
presented to and approved by the RSAC
Committee on December 14, 2010. This
rulemaking will (1) Establish minimum
training standards for each class or craft
of safety-related employee and
equivalent railroad contractor and
subcontractor employee that require
railroads, contractors, and
subcontractors to qualify or otherwise
document the proficiency of such
employees in each such class and craft
regarding their knowledge and ability to
comply with Federal railroad safety
laws and regulations and railroad rules
and procedures intended to implement
those laws and regulations, etc.; (2)
require submission of railroads’,
contractors’, and subcontractors’
training and qualification programs for
FRA approval; and (3) establish a
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
73004
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
minimum training curriculum and
ongoing training criteria, testing, and
skills evaluation measures for track and
equipment inspectors employed by
railroads and railroad contractor and
subcontractors. The resulting NPRM is
under development with a target
publication date of January 2012. No
additional working group meetings are
scheduled at this time. Contact: Michael
Logue, (202) 493–6301.
Task No. 10–02—Safety Technology
in Dark Territory. This task was
accepted on September 23, 2010, to
provide advice regarding development
of standards, guidance, regulations, or
orders governing the development, use,
and implementation of rail safety
technology in dark territory, as required
by Section 406 of the RSIA. Specifically,
to assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate
and to report recommendations to the
FRA Administrator for proposed or
interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with the Office of
the Secretary of Transportation and the
Office of Management and Budget) by
September 30, 2011. This rulemaking
would issue standards or guidance
governing development and deployment
of technology to promote safe operation
in non-signaled territory in
arrangements not defined in signal
inspection law. The delay in starting
this effort was caused by the PTC
rulemaking, which required the same
key personnel both in government and
industry. With the PTC effort maturing,
resources became available and the Dark
Territory Working Group was formed to
assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate
and to report recommendations to the
FRA Administrator for proposed or
interim final rule (as determined by
FRA in consultation with OST and
OMB). The working group met on
March 3–4, 2011, May 9–10, 2011, and
September 6–7, 2011 and created four
task forces to investigate specific subject
areas. A follow-on meeting is scheduled
for November 17–18, 2011, and the
target date for reporting
recommendations to the RSAC
Committee is December 2011. Contact:
Olga Cataldi, (202) 493–6321.
Task No. 11–01—Preventing Railroad
Employee Distractions Caused by
Personal Electronic Devices. This task
was accepted on May 20, 2011, to
prescribe mitigation strategies, programs
and processes for governing the use of
personal electronic devices that could
cause distractions to railroad employees
engaged in safety-critical activities. This
working group will explore additional
methods to achieve compliance through
education, peer-to-peer intervention,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
counseling and other cooperative, nonregulatory/punitive methods. The
Electronic Device Distraction Working
Group was formed and held its kickoff
meeting on October 25–26, 2011. The
group is scheduled to meet next on
January 11–12, 2011. Contact: Miriam
Kloeppel, (202) 493–6224.
Task No. 11–02—Track Inspection
Time Study. This task was accepted by
the Committee electronically on August
16, 2011, to consider specific
improvements to the Track Safety
Standards or other responsive actions
related to the Track Inspection Time
Study required by Sections 403 (a)–(c)
of the RSIA and other relevant studies
and resources. Sections 403(a) and (b) of
the RSIA required a study of inspection
practices and the amount of time
required for inspections under the Track
Safety Standards, and another set of
revisions to those regulations. The
report was due by October 16, 2010, on
the results of a specified track
inspection time and track safety study.
FRA is expected to make
recommendations for rule changes and,
under Section 403(c), not later than 2
years after completion of the study,
prescribe regulations based on its
results. FRA organized an independent
study by an outside contractor and
developed a questionnaire used to get
information from railroad track
inspectors throughout the country;
interviews with railroad and union
officials were also conducted for
additional perspectives. The Track
Inspection Time Study was completed
and signed by the Secretary on May 2,
2011, starting the 2-year timeline for
rulemaking. The task was given to the
Track Standards Working Group and it
held a kickoff meeting on October 20,
2011, and follow-on meetings are
scheduled for December 20–21, 2011;
February 7–8, and April 26–27, 2012.
Contact: Ken Rusk, (202) 493–6236.
Completed Tasks
Task 96–1—(Completed) Revising the
freight power brake regulations.
Task 96–2—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to the
Track Safety Standards (49 CFR Part
213).
Task 96–3—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to the
Radio Standards and Procedures (49
CFR Part 220).
Task 96–5—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to Steam
Locomotive Inspection Standards (49
CFR Part 230).
Task 96–6—(Completed) Reviewing
and recommending revisions to
miscellaneous aspects of the regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addressing locomotive engineer
certification (49 CFR Part 240).
Task 96–7—(Completed) Developing
roadway maintenance machines (ontrack equipment) safety standards.
Task 96–8—(Completed) This
planning task evaluated the need for
action responsive to recommendations
contained in a report to Congress titled,
Locomotive Crashworthiness & Working
Conditions.
Task 97–1—(Completed) Developing
crashworthiness specifications (49 CFR
Part 229) to promote the integrity of the
locomotive cab in accidents resulting
from collisions.
Task 97–2—(Completed) Evaluating
the extent to which environmental,
sanitary, and other working conditions
in locomotive cabs affect the crew’s
health and the safe operation of
locomotives, proposing standards where
appropriate.
Task 97–3—(Completed) Developing
event recorder data survivability
standards.
Task 97–4 and Task 97–5—
(Completed) Defining PTC
functionalities, describing available
technologies, evaluating costs and
benefits of potential systems, and
considering implementation
opportunities and challenges, including
demonstration and deployment.
Task 97–6—(Completed) Revising
various regulations to address the safety
implications of processor-based signal
and train control technologies,
including communications-based
operating systems.
Task 97–7—(Completed) Determining
damages qualifying an event as a
reportable train accident.
Task 00–1—(Completed—task
withdrawn) Determining the need to
amend regulations protecting persons
who work on, under, or between rolling
equipment and persons applying,
removing, or inspecting rear end
marking devices (Blue Signal
Protection).
Task 01–1—(Completed) Developing
conformity of FRA’s regulations for
accident/incident reporting (49 CFR Part
225) to revised regulations of the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, and to make appropriate
revisions to the FRA Guide for
Preparing Accident/Incident Reports
(Reporting Guide).
Task 08–01—(Completed) Report on
the Nation’s railroad bridges. Report to
FRA on the current state of railroad
bridge safety management; update the
findings and conclusions of the 1993
Summary Report of the FRA Railroad
Bridge Safety Survey.
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2011 / Notices
Task No. 08–06—(Completed) Hours
of Service Recordkeeping and
Reporting. Develop revised
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for hours of service of
railroad employees. Final rule
published May 27, 2009, with an
effective date of July 16, 2009. (74 FR
25330).
Task No. 08–05—(Completed)
Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance.
Develop a rule encompassing the
requirements of Section 417 of the RSIA
(Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance), of
RSIA bridge failure. Final rule
published July 15, 2010 (75 FR–41282).
Task 06–02—(Completed) Track
Safety Standards and CWR. Issue
requirements for inspection of joint bars
in CWR to detect cracks that could affect
the integrity of the track structure
published a final rule on August 25,
2009, with correcting amendment
published on October 21, 2009.
Please refer to the notice published in
the Federal Register on March 11, 1996,
(61 FR 9740) for more information about
the RSAC.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
21, 2011.
Brenda J. Moscoso,
Director, Office of Safety Analysis, Risk
Reduction, and Crossing/Trespasser
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–30476 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket Number MARAD 2011 0152]
Requested Administrative Waiver of
the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel
DAUNTLESS; Invitation for Public
Comments
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
As authorized by 46 U.S.C.
12121, the Secretary of Transportation,
as represented by the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), is authorized
to grant waivers of the U.S.-build
requirement of the coastwise laws under
certain circumstances. A request for
such a waiver has been received by
MARAD. The vessel, and a brief
description of the proposed service, is
listed below.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
December 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2011–0152.
Written comments may be submitted by
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Nov 25, 2011
Jkt 226001
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joann Spittle, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W21–203,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone (202)
366–5979, Email Joann.Spittle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel DAUNTLESS is:
Intended Commercial Use of Vessel:
‘‘Coastal sightseeing.’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘ME, NH, MA, RI,
CT, NY.’’
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2011–0152 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR Part 388.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73005
Dated: November 17, 2011.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–30609 Filed 11–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0143; Notice 2]
JCA Corporation, Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Petition Grant.
AGENCY:
JCA Corporation (JCA)1, has
determined that certain Trail America
brand Special Trailer ‘‘ST’’ tires that it
imported failed to meet the
requirements of paragraph S6.5(d) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires
for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of
more than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000
Pounds) and Motorcycles. JCA has filed
an appropriate report pursuant to 49
CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports (dated October 19, 2009).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), JCA has petitioned for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of JCA’s petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on November 9, 2010,
in the Federal Register (75 FR 68854).
No comments were received. To view
the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2010–
0143.’’
For further information on this
decision, contact Mr. George Gillespie,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5299, facsimile (202) 366–
7002.
JCA estimates that approximately
899,804 Trail America brand Special
Trailer ‘‘ST’’ tires that were
SUMMARY:
1 JCA Corporation (JCA) is a State of Washington
corporation that imports replacement motor vehicle
equipment.
E:\FR\FM\28NON1.SGM
28NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 228 (Monday, November 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72997-73005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30476]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA-2000-7257; Notice No. 68]
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC); Working Group Activity
Update
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Announcement of Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
Working Group activities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FRA is updating its announcement of RSAC's Working Group
activities to reflect its current status.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Woolverton, RSAC Designated
Federal Officer/Administrative Officer, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6212; or Robert
Lauby, Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Mailstop 25, Washington,
DC 20590, (202) 493-6474.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice serves to update FRA's last
announcement of working group activities and status reports of December
7, 2010 (75 FR 76070). The 44th full RSAC meeting was held May 20,
2011, and the 45th meeting is scheduled for December 8, 2011, at the
National Association of Home Builders, National Housing Center, located
at 1201 15th Street NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Since its first meeting in April of 1996, the RSAC has accepted 36
tasks. Status for each of the open tasks (neither completed nor
terminated) is provided below:
Open Tasks
Task 96-4--Tourist and Historic Railroads. Reviewing the
appropriateness of the agency's current policy regarding the
applicability of existing and proposed regulations to tourist,
excursion, scenic, and historic railroads. This task was accepted on
April 2, 1996, and a working group was established. The working group
monitored the steam locomotive regulation task. Planned future
activities involve the review of other regulations for possible
adaptation to the safety needs of tourist and historic railroads.
Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493-6474.
Task 03-01--Passenger Safety. This task includes updating and
enhancing the regulations pertaining to passenger safety, based on
research and experience. This task was accepted on May 20, 2003, and a
working group was established. Prior to embarking on substantive
discussions of a specific task, the working group set forth in writing
a specific description of the task. The working group reports planned
activity to the full RSAC at each scheduled full RSAC meeting,
including milestones for completion of projects and progress toward
completion. At the first meeting held on September 9-10, 2003, a
consolidated list of issues was completed. At the second meeting, held
on November 6-7, 2003, four task groups were established: Emergency
Preparedness, Mechanical, Crashworthiness, and Track/Vehicle
Interaction. The task forces met and reported on activities for working
group consideration at the third meeting, held on May 11-12, 2004, and
a fourth meeting was held October 26-27, 2004. The working group met on
March 21-22, 2006, and again on September 12-13, 2006, at which time
the group agreed to establish a task force on General Passenger Safety.
The full Passenger Safety Working Group met on
[[Page 72998]]
April 17-18, 2007; December 11-12, 2007; November 13, 2008; and June 8,
2009. On August 5, 2009, the working group was requested to establish
an Engineering Task Force (ETF) to consider technical criteria and
procedures for qualifying alternative passenger equipment designs as
equivalent in safety to equipment meeting the design standards in the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards. The working group met last on
September 16, 2010, and no additional meetings are currently scheduled.
Contact: Charles Bielitz, (202) 493-6314.
Engineering Task Force. The Passenger Safety Working Group approved
a request from FRA to establish an ETF under the Passenger Safety
Working Group in August 2009. The mission of the task force is to
produce a set of technical evaluation criteria and procedures for
passenger rail equipment built to alternative designs. The technical
evaluation criteria and procedures would provide a means of
establishing whether an alternative design would result in performance
at least equal to the structural design standards set forth in the
Passenger Equipment Safety Standards (Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 238). The initial focus of this effort will be
on Tier I standards. When completed, the criteria and procedures would
form a technical basis for making determinations concerning equivalent
safety pursuant to 49 CFR Section 238.201, and provide a technical
framework for presenting evidence to FRA in support of any request for
waiver of the compressive (buff) strength requirement, as set forth in
49 CFR 238.203. See 49 CFR part 211, Rules of Practice. The criteria
and procedures could be incorporated into Part 238 at a later date
after notice and opportunity for public comment. The ETF was formed and
a kickoff meeting was held on September 23-24, 2009. The group held
follow-on meetings November 3-4, 2009; January 7-8, 2010; and March 9-
10, 2010. A followup GoTo/Webinar meeting was held on July 12, 2010.
The ETF developed a draft ``Criteria and Procedures Report,'' that was
approved by the Passenger Safety Working Group during the September 16,
2010, meeting and by the RSAC Committee during the September 23, 2010,
meeting. The document has been placed on the FRA Web site at the
following address: https://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/RSAC_REPORT-%209-16-10.pdf.
Engineering Task Force II. To build on the success of the ETF in
developing a set of alternative technical criteria and procedures for
evaluating the crashworthiness and occupant protection performance of
passenger rail equipment in service at conventional operating speeds,
the FRA requested that the Passenger Safety Working Group re-task the
group to concentrate on developing crashworthiness and occupant
protection safety recommendations for high-speed passenger trains. The
Passenger Safety Working Group accepted the task on July 28, 2010, by
electronic vote. Under the new task, the task force may address any
safety features of the equipment, including but not limited to
crashworthiness, interior occupant protection, glazing, emergency
egress, and fire safety features. Any type of equipment may be
addressed, including conventional locomotives, high-speed power cars,
cab cars, multiple-unit (MU) locomotives, and coach cars. The equipment
addressed may be used in any type of passenger service, from
conventional-speed to high-speed. Recommendations may take the form of
criteria and procedures, revisions to existing regulations, or adoption
of new regulations, including rules of particular applicability. The
work of the re-tasked ETF is intended to assist FRA in developing
appropriate safety standards for the high-speed rail projects planned
for California. The Engineering Task Force II held a kickoff meeting on
October 21-22, 2010, to begin work on the new high-speed task, and had
follow-on meetings on January 11-12, 2011, February 14-15 2011, March
30-31, 2011, and June 16-17, 2011. Consensus Tier III recommendations
of the ETF have been developed and were accepted by vote during a
scheduled meeting on October 6-7, 2011. The ETF II has formed two
additional Task Groups to work in the areas of track worthiness and
brakes. The Track worthiness Task Group is tasked to identify potential
safety issues related to operation of high-speed train sets on
conventional track and to make recommendations on how best to mitigate
any consequences. The Task Group includes experts and key stakeholders
such as international operators of high-speed equipment, car builders,
wheel/rail interaction dynamics specialists, and other RSAC working
group members involved in vehicle/track interaction. The Brakes Task
Group is tasked to review braking system requirements and international
braking system requirements verses existing U.S. requirements including
inspection and maintenance and identify common features, determine
basic parameters and consider use of service proven braking systems.
The Task Group will also consider performance based provisions/
requirements with consideration for operator's to develop maintenance,
inspection, and service plans and make recommendations regarding brakes
to the ETF II as related to Tier III. Contact: Robert Lauby, (202) 493-
6474.
Emergency Preparedness Task Force. At the working group meeting on
March 9-10, 2005, the working group received and approved the consensus
report of the Emergency Preparedness Task Force related to emergency
communication, emergency egress, and rescue access. These
recommendations were presented to and approved by the full RSAC on May
18, 2005. The working group met on September 7-8, 2005, and additional,
supplementary recommendations were presented to and accepted by the
full RSAC on October 11, 2005. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
was published on August 24, 2006 (71 FR 50275), and was open for
comment until October 23, 2006. The working group agreed upon
recommendations for the final rule, including resolution of final
comments received, during the April 17-18, 2007, meeting. The
recommendations were presented to and approved by the full RSAC on June
26, 2007. The Passenger Train Emergency Systems final rule, focusing on
emergency communication, emergency egress, and rescue access, was
published on February 1, 2008 (73 FR 6370). The task force met on
October 17-18, 2007, and reached consensus on the draft rule text for a
followup NPRM on Passenger Train Emergency Systems, focusing on low
location emergency exit path marking, emergency lighting, and emergency
signage. The task force presented the draft rule text to the Passenger
Safety Working Group on December 11-12, 2007, and the consensus draft
rule text was presented to, and approved by full RSAC vote during the
February 20, 2008, meeting. During the May 13-14, 2008, meeting, the
task force recommended clarifying the applicability of back-up
emergency communication system requirements in the February 1, 2008,
final rule, and FRA announced its intention to exercise limited
enforcement discretion for a new provision amending instruction
requirements for emergency window exit removal. The working group
ratified these recommendations on June 19, 2008. The task force met
again on March 31, 2009, to clarify issues related to the followup NPRM
raised by members. The modified rule text was presented to and approved
by the Passenger Safety Working Group on June 8, 2009. The working
group requested that FRA draft
[[Page 72999]]
the rule text requiring daily inspection of removable panels or windows
in vestibule doors and entrust the Emergency Preparedness Task Force
with reviewing the text. FRA sent the draft text to the task force for
review and comment on August 4, 2009. The draft rule text was approved
by the Passenger Safety Working Group by mail ballot on December 23,
2009. The target timeframe for the NPRM publication has been pushed
back to November 2012 due to competing Rail Safety Improvement Act of
2008 (RSIA) priorities. No additional task force meetings are currently
scheduled. Contact: Brenda Moscoso, (202) 493-6282.
Mechanical Task Force--Completed. Initial recommendations on
mechanical issues (revisions to 49 CFR Part 238) were approved by the
full RSAC on January 26, 2005. At the working group meeting of
September 7-8, 2005, the task force presented additional perfecting
amendments and the full RSAC approved them on October 11, 2005. An NPRM
was published in the Federal Register on December 8, 2005 (70 FR
73070). Public comments were due by February 17, 2006. The final rule
was published in the Federal Register on October 19, 2006 (71 FR
61835), effective December 18, 2006.
Crashworthiness Task Force--Completed. Among its efforts, the
Crashworthiness Task Force provided consensus recommendations on
static-end strength that were adopted by the working group on September
7-8, 2005. The full RSAC accepted the recommendations on October 11,
2005. The front-end strength of cab cars and MU locomotives NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2007 (72 FR 42016), with
comments due by October 1, 2007. A number of comments were entered into
the docket, and a Crashworthiness Task Force meeting was held September
9, 2008, to resolve comments on the NPRM. Based on the consensus
language agreed to at the meeting, FRA has prepared the text of the
final rule incorporating the resolutions made at the task force meeting
and the final rule language was adopted at the Passenger Safety Working
Group meeting held on November 13, 2008. The language was presented and
approved at the December 10, 2008, full RSAC meeting. The final rule
was issued on December 31, 2009, and published on January 8, 2010 (75
FR 1180). Contact: Gary Fairbanks, (202) 493-6322.
Vehicle/Track Interaction Task Force. The task force is developing
proposed revisions to 49 CFR Parts 213 and 238, principally regarding
high-speed passenger service. The task force met on October 9-11, 2007,
and again on November 19-20, 2007, in Washington, DC, and presented the
final task force report and final recommendations and proposed rule
text for approval by the Passenger Safety Working Group at the December
11-12, 2007, meeting. The final report and the proposed rule text were
approved by the working group and were presented to and approved by
full RSAC vote during the February 20, 2008, meeting. The group met on
February 27-28, 2008, and by teleconference on March 18, 2010, to
address unresolved issues, and the NPRM was published on May 10, 2010
(75 FR 25928). The task force was called back into session on August 5-
6, 2010, to review and consider NPRM comments. The final rule will
amend the Track Safety Standards and Passenger Equipment Safety
Standards for high-speed train operations and train operations at high
cant deficiencies to promote the safe interaction of rail vehicles with
the track over which they operate. It will revise both the safety
limits for these operations and the process to qualify them. It
accounts for a range of vehicle types that are currently used and may
likely be used on future high-speed or high cant deficiency rail
operations, and would provide safety assurance for train operations in
all classes of track. It is based on the results of simulation studies
designed to identify track geometry irregularities associated with
unsafe wheel forces and acceleration, thorough reviews of vehicle
qualification and revenue service test data, and consideration of
international practices. The draft final rule was sent to the task
force for final consensus on November 11, 2011. The target date set for
the final rule is April 2012. Contact: John Mardente, (202) 493-1335.
General Passenger Safety Task Force. At the Passenger Safety
Working Group meeting on April 17-18, 2007, the task force presented a
progress report to the working group. The task force met on July 18-19,
2007, and afterwards it reported proposed reporting cause codes for
injuries involving the platform gap, which were approved by the Working
Group by mail ballot in September 2007. The full RSAC approved the
recommendations for changes to 49 CFR Part 225 accident/incident cause
codes on October 25, 2007. The General Passenger Safety Task Force
presented draft guidance material for management of the gap that was
considered and approved by the Working Group during the December 11-12,
2007, meeting and was presented to and approved by full RSAC vote
during the February 20, 2008, meeting. The group met April 23-24, 2008,
December 3-4, 2008, April 21-23, 2009, October 7-8, 2009, and July 30,
2010 by GoTo/Webinar teleconference. The task force continues work on
passenger train door securement, ``second train in station,''
trespasser incidents, and System Safety-based solutions by developing a
regulatory approach to System Safety. The task force has created two
task groups to focus on these issues.
The Door Safety Task Group has reached consensus on 47 out of 48
safety issues and had five items that have been remanded to the task
force for vote. The issues are addressed in the area of passenger train
door mechanical and operational requirements and presented draft
regulatory language to the Passenger Safety Working Group at the
September 16, 2010, meeting. More work remains to ensure the 49 CFR
Part 238 door rule consensus document and the proposed American Public
Transit Association (APTA) door standard (APTA SS-M-18-10) use uniform
language. The document was approved by the Passenger Safety Working
Group by electronic vote on March 31, 2011, and approved by the RSAC on
May 20, 2011. This rulemaking would amend the passenger equipment
safety standards to enhance safety standards as they relate to
passenger door securement while a passenger train is in service based
on research and experiences of FRA safety inspectors. Specifically, FRA
would incorporate by reference APTA standard: ``APTA SS-M-18-10
Standard for Powered Exterior Side Door System Design for New Passenger
Cars.'' A draft NPRM is currently under development with a target
publication date of May 2012. No additional Door Task Group meetings
are currently scheduled. Contact: Brian Hontz, (610) 521-8220.
The System Safety Task Group has produced draft regulatory language
for a System Safety Rule, but further work on this rulemaking is
delayed until a study of legal protections for Risk Reduction Program
(RRP) and System Safety Program (SSP) risk analysis data that is
required by the RSIA is complete. The legal study is expected to be
complete by December 2012. The System Safety rulemaking would improve
passenger railroad safety through structured, proactive processes and
procedures developed by passenger railroad operators. It would require
passenger railroads to establish an SSP that would systematically
evaluate and manage risks in order to reduce the number and rates of
railroad accidents, incidents, injuries, and fatalities. The target
date
[[Page 73000]]
for NPRM publication is May 2012. No additional System Safety Task
Group meetings are currently scheduled. Contact: Dan Knote, (631) 567-
1596.
Task 05-01--Review of Roadway Worker Protection Issues. This task
was accepted on January 26, 2005, to review 49 CFR part 214, Subpart C,
Roadway Worker Protection (RWP), and related sections of Subpart A; to
recommend consideration of specific actions to advance the on-track
safety of railroad employees and contractors engaged in maintenance-of-
way activities throughout the general system of railroad
transportation, including clarification of existing requirements. A
working group was established and reported to the RSAC any specific
actions identified as appropriate. The first meeting of the working
group was held on April 12-14, 2005. Over the course of 2 years, the
group drafted and reached consensus on regulatory language for various
revisions, clarifications, and additions to 32 separate items in 19
sections of the rule. However, two parties raised technical concerns
regarding one of those items, namely, the draft language concerning
electronic display of track authorities. The working group presented
and received approval on all of its consensus recommendations for draft
rule text to the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007, meeting. FRA will
address the electronic display of track authorities issue, along with
eight additional items that the working group was unable to reach
consensus, through the traditional NPRM process. In early 2008, the
external working group members were solicited to review the consensus
rule text for errata review. In order to address the heightened
concerns raised with the current regulations for adjacent-track, on-
track safety, FRA decided to issue, on an accelerated basis, a separate
NPRM that would focus on this element of the RWP rule alone. An NPRM
with an abbreviated comment period regarding adjacent-track, on-track
safety was published on July 17, 2008, but was later withdrawn on
August 13, 2008, to permit further consideration of the RSAC consensus
language. A second NPRM concerning adjacent-controlled-track, on-track
safety was published on November 25, 2009, and comments were due to the
docket by January 25, 2010. Comments have been reviewed and considered
by FRA, and the target publication date for the final rule is November
2011. Due to the ongoing work of this separate rulemaking, the
remaining larger NPRM relating to the various revisions,
clarifications, and additions to 31 separate items in 19 sections of
the rule, and FRA's recommendations for nine nonconsensus items is now
planned for early 2012. Contact: Joe Riley, (202) 493-6357.
Task 05-02--Reduce Human Factor-Caused Train Accident/Incidents.
This task was accepted on May 18, 2005, to reduce the number of human
factor-caused train accidents/incidents and related employee injuries.
The Railroad Operating Rules Working Group was formed, and the working
group extensively reviewed the issues presented. The final working
group meeting devoted to developing a proposed rule was held February
8-9, 2006. The working group was not able to deliver a consensus
regulatory proposal, but it did recommend that it be used to review
comments on FRA's NPRM, which was published in the Federal Register on
October 12, 2006 (FR 71 60372), with public comments due by December
11, 2006. Two reviews were held, one on February 8-9, 2007, and one on
April 4-5, 2007. Consensus was reached on four items and those items
were presented and accepted by the full RSAC at the June 26, 2007,
meeting. A final rule was published in the Federal Register on February
13, 2008 (73 FR 8442), with an effective date of April 14, 2008. FRA
received four petitions for reconsideration of that final rule. The
final rule that responded to the petitions for consideration was
published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2008, and concluded the
rulemaking. Working group meetings were held September 27-28, 2007;
January 17-18, 2008; May 21-22, 2008; and September 25-26, 2008. The
working group has considered issues related to issuance of Emergency
Order No. 26 (prohibition on use of certain electronic devices while on
duty), and ``after arrival mandatory directives,'' among other issues.
The working group continues to work on after arrival orders, and at the
September 25-26, 2008, meeting voted to create a Highway-Rail Grade
Crossing Task Force to review highway-rail grade crossing accident
reports regarding incidents of grade crossing warning systems providing
``short or no warning'' resulting from or contributed to ``by train
operational issues'' with the intent to recommend new accident/incident
reporting codes that would better explain such events, and which may
provide information for remedial action going forward. A followup task
is to review and provide recommendations regarding supplementary
reporting of train operations-related, no-warning or short-warning
incidents that are not technically warning system activation failures,
but that result in an accident/incident or a near miss. The task force
has been formed and will begin work after other RSIA priorities are
met. Contact: Douglas Taylor, (202) 493-6255.
Task 06-01--Locomotive Safety Standards. This task was accepted on
February 22, 2006, to review 49 CFR part 229, Railroad Locomotive
Safety Standards, and revise as appropriate. A working group was
established with the mandate to report any planned activity to the full
Committee at each scheduled full RSAC meeting, to include milestones
for completion of projects and progress toward completion. The first
working group meeting was held May 8-10, 2006. Working group meetings
were held on August 8-9, 2006; September 25-26, 2006; October 30-31,
2006; and the working group presented recommendations regarding
revisions to requirements for locomotive sanders to the full RSAC on
September 21, 2006. The NPRM regarding sanders was published in the
Federal Register on March 6, 2007 (72 FR 9904). Comments received were
discussed by the working group for clarification, and FRA published a
final rule on October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59216). The working group met on
January 9-10, 2007; November 27-28, 2007; February 5-6, 2008; May 20-
21, 2008; August 5-6, 2008; October 22-23, 2008; January 6-7, 2009; and
April 15-16, 2009. The working group has now completed the review of 49
CFR Part 229 and was unable to reach consensus regarding locomotive cab
temperature standards, locomotive alerters, and remote control
locomotives. The group reached consensus regarding critical locomotive
electronic standards, updated annual/biennial air brake standards,
clarification of the ``air brakes operate as intended'' requirement,
locomotive pilot clearance within hump classification yards,
clarification of the ``high voltage'' warning requirement, an update of
``headlight lamp'' requirements, and language to allow locomotive
records to be stored electronically. The working group presented a
draft 49 CFR part 229 rule text revision covering these items to the
RSAC for consideration at the September 10, 2009, meeting and received
approval. The NPRM was delayed due to competing RSIA priorities and the
need for additional language. The NPRM was published on January 12,
2011 (76 FR 2200), and the final rule is scheduled to be published in
December 2011. This rulemaking would amend the rules pertaining to the
Locomotive Safety Standards. The
[[Page 73001]]
proposed amendments would update, consolidate, and clarify existing
rules, and adopt existing industry and engineering best practices. The
proposed amendments include: Updating locomotive inspection
recordkeeping requirements by permitting electronic records;
consolidating locomotive air brake maintenance into a single provision;
clarifying locomotive headlight requirements to address new technology;
and establishing locomotive electronics standards based on existing
industry and engineering best practices, as well as other existing
Federal electronics standards. This action is taken by FRA in an effort
to improve its safety regulator program. The working group may be
called back to address comments received on the final rule after
publication. Contact: Steve Clay, (202) 493-6259.
Task 06-03--Medical Standards for Safety-Critical Personnel. This
task was accepted on September 21, 2006, to enhance the safety of
persons in the railroad operating environment and the public by
establishing standards and procedures for determining the medical
fitness for duty of personnel engaged in safety-critical functions. A
working group was established by the full RSAC and reports its
activities and progress toward completion of this task to the full RSAC
during each meeting of the full RSAC. The first working group meeting
was held December 12-13, 2006, and the working group has held follow-on
meetings on February 20-21, 2007; July 24-25, 2007; August 29-30, 2007;
October 31-November 1, 2007; December 4-5, 2007; February 13-14, 2008;
March 26-27, 2008; April 22-23, 2008; December 8-9, 2009; February 16-
17, 2010; March 11-12, 2010; May 24-26, 2010; August 31-September 1,
2010; November 18-19, 2010; February 16-17, 2010; March 11-12, 2010;
May 24-26, 2010; August 31-September 1, 2010; November 18-19, 2010; and
September 27-28, 2011. During the working group's September 2011
meeting, the working group discussed stakeholder positions on the draft
rule text and draft medical qualification criteria and protocols, and a
preliminary cost-benefit analysis was presented to the working group by
the FRA economist. The working group tentatively agreed to proceed to
revise its draft recommendations to include a proposed option that the
medical qualification criteria be issued as medical qualification
guidelines rather than standards. The working group established a task
force to draft proposed revisions to working draft documents to be
presented to the working group for review and comment. The next working
group meeting is scheduled to be held February 1-2, 2012, in
Washington, DC. Contact: Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202) 493-6002.
Physicians Task Force. A Physicians Task Force was established by
the working group in May 2007, and tasked to draft recommended medical
qualification criteria and protocols for locomotive engineers and
conductors. The Physicians Task Force has had meetings or conference
calls on July 24, 2007; August 20, 2007; October 15, 2007; October 31,
2007; June 23-24, 2008; September 8-10, 2008; October 8, 2008; November
12-13, 2008; December 8-10, 2008; January 27-28, 2009; February 24-25,
2009; March 11-12, 2009; March 31-April 1, 2009; April 15, 2009; April
22, 2009; May 13, 2009; May 20, 2009; June 17, 2009; January 21-22,
2010; March 3, 2010; August 16-17, 2010; and October 25-26, 2010;
December 17, 2010; January 11, 2011; March 3-4, 2011; May 16-17, 2011;
August 18, 2011; August 25, 2011; August 31, 2011. On September 1,
2011, the task force notified working group members that it had made
significant progress in completing its task and requested that the
working group participate in clarifying a limited number of remaining
operational issues relevant to the task that merited review by industry
management, labor, and other stakeholders. No further meetings of the
Physicians Task Force are currently scheduled. Contact: Dr. Bernard
Arseneau, (202) 493-6002.
Critical Incident Task Force. The Medical Standards Working Group
accepted RSAC Task 2009-02, Critical Incident Response, during the
December 8-9, 2010, meeting. The working group has been tasked to
provide advice regarding development of implementing regulations for
critical incident stress plans as required by the RSIA. A Critical
Incident Task Force was established by the working group during the May
24-26, 2010, Medical Standards Working Group meeting. The scheduled
kickoff meeting for the Critical Incident Task Force scheduled for
September 2, 2010, was postponed at the request of industry
participants. In late March 2011, FRA leadership decided to request
that the RSAC be asked to amend the Critical Incident task statement to
remove reference to the Medical Standards Working Group and to allow
the group to assume full working group status to expedite the work. The
Committee approved the revised task statement with a target date for
recommendations to the Committee of December 2011 and the task force
transitioned to the Critical Incident Working Group. (See Critical
Incident Working Group entry.) Contact: Dr. Bernard Arseneau, (202)
493-6002.
Task 07-01--Track Safety Standards. This task was accepted on
February 22, 2007, to consider specific improvements to the Track
Safety Standards or other responsive actions, supplementing work
already underway on continuous welded rail (CWR) specifically to:
Review controls applied to the re-use of rail in CWR ``plug rail'';
review the issue of cracks emanating from bond wire attachments;
consider improvements in the Track Safety Standards related to
fastening of rail to concrete ties; and ensure a common understanding
within the regulated community concerning requirements for internal
rail flaw inspections. The tasks were assigned to the Track Safety
Standards Working Group. The working group will report any planned
activity to the full Committee at each scheduled full RSAC meeting,
including milestones for completion of projects and progress toward
completion. The first working group meeting was held on June 27-28,
2007, and the group met again on August 15-16, 2007, and October 23-24,
2007. Two task forces were created under the working group: Concrete
Ties Task Force and Rail Integrity Task Force. The Concrete Ties Task
Force met on November 26-27, 2007; February 13-14, 2008; April 16-17,
2008; July 9-10, 2008; and September 17-18, 2008. The Concrete Ties
Task Force finalized consensus language regarding concrete crossties
(49 CFR Part 213) and presented a recommendation to the Track Standards
Working Group at the November 20, 2008, working group meeting. The
language was approved by both the working group and the December 10,
2008, RSAC meeting and the task force was dissolved. The Concrete
Crossties NPRM was published on August 26, 2010 (75 FR 52490). The
Track Standards Working Group met on October 26-27, 2010, to discuss
the outstanding issue of plug rail. The working group reached consensus
on regulatory language regarding the reuse of plug rail and the
consensus language was presented to and approved by the RSAC Committee
during the December 14, 2010 meeting. RSAC Task 07-01 will be complete
once the final rule is issued. Contact: Carlo Patrick, (202) 493-6399.
Task 08-03--Track Safety Standards Rail Integrity. This task was
accepted on September 10, 2008, to consider specific improvements to
the Track Safety Standards or other responsive actions designed to
enhance rail integrity. The Rail Integrity Task Force was created in
October 2007 under Task 07-01 and
[[Page 73002]]
first met on November 28-29, 2007. The task force met on February 12-
13, 2008; April 15-16, 2008; July 8-9, 2008; September 16-17, 2008;
February 3-4, 2009; June 16-17, 2009; October 29-30, 2009; January 20-
21, 2010; March 9-11, 2010; and April 20, 2010. Consensus has been
achieved on bond wires and a common understanding on internal rail flaw
inspections has been reached. The task force has reached consensus to
recommend to the working group that the item regarding ``the effect of
rail head wear, surface conditions and other relevant factors on the
acquisition and interpretation of internal rail flaw test results'' be
closed. The task force does not recommend regulatory action concerning
head wear. Surface conditions and their effect on test integrity has
been discussed and understood during dialogue concerning common
understanding on internal rail flaw inspections. The task force
believes that new technology has been developed that improves test
performance and will impact the effect of head wear and surface
conditions on interpretation of internal rail flaw test results.
Consensus text was developed on recommended changes that would approach
a performance-based approach to flaw detection scheduling. However, the
group did not reach consensus on what length of segment of track is
practical to use on determining test cycles. Consensus text has been
finalized for recommended changes to 49 CFR 213.113, Defective rails;
213.237, Rail inspection; and 213.241, Inspection records. The task
force has developed a new 49 CFR 213.238, Qualified operator language,
that defines the minimum requirements for the training of a rail flaw
detector car operator. The task force presented the consensus language
to the Track Standards Working Group during the July 28-30, 2010,
meeting and the Track Standards Working Group presented its consensus
recommendations to the RSAC Committee for approval during the September
23, 2010, Committee meeting. By majority vote, the RSAC accepted the
recommendations of the Track Standards Working Group and forwarded
those recommendations to the Administrator completing RSAC Task 08-03.
The associated NPRM is currently in development and RSAC Task 08-03
will be complete once the final rule is issued. Contact: Carlo Patrick,
(202) 493-6399.
Task No. 08-04--Positive Train Control. This task was accepted on
December 10, 2008, to provide advice regarding development of
implementing regulations for Positive Train Control (PTC) systems and
their deployment under the RSIA. The task included a requirement to
convene an initial meeting no later than January 2009, and to report
recommendations back to RSAC no later than April 24, 2009. The PTC
Working Group was created in December 2008 by working group member
nominations from committee member organizations under Task 08-04 and
the kickoff meeting was held on January 26-27, 2009. The group met
again on February 11-13, 25-27; March 17-18, 2009; and March 31-April
1, 2009. On April 2, 2009, the RSAC approved the request by the working
group for agreement to vote on the draft rule text recommendations from
the working group by mail ballot. On May 11, 2009, by majority vote via
mail ballot, the RSAC accepted the recommendations of the PTC Working
Group and forwarded those recommendations to the Administrator, with
the understanding that there are other issues that FRA would be making
proposals with respect to their resolution. The NPRM was published on
July 21, 2009 (74 FR 36152), with comments due by August 20, 2009. In
addition, a public hearing was held on August 13, 2009 (74 FR 36152).
The PTC Working Group was reconvened on August 31-September 2, 2009, to
discuss comments received on the NPRM and the PTC Working Group
presented consensus rule text items to the RSAC for approval at the
September 10, 2009, meeting. The PTC consensus rule text was approved
by majority RSAC vote by electronic ballot on September 24, 2009, and
the final rule was published on January 15, 2010 (75 FR 2598). Final
rule amendments were published on September 27, 2010 (75 FR 59108). An
NPRM proposing amendments to the PTC Final Rule that would remove
various regulatory requirements that require railroads to either
conduct further analyses or meet certain risk-based criteria in order
to avoid PTC system implementation on track segments that do not
transport poison- or toxic-by-inhalation hazardous materials traffic,
and are not used for intercity or commuter rail passenger
transportation, as of December 31, 2015, was published on August 24,
2011 (76 FR 52918) with comments due by October 24, 2011. The PTC
Working Group met on October 21, 2011, to provide input for an
additional NPRM intended to address further rule considerations. FRA
did not seek consensus from the RSAC or PTC Working Group on the
substance of this NPRM, but requested the working group's valued
assistance and input in its development. No additional meetings are
scheduled at this time. Contact: Tom McFarlin, (202) 493-6203.
PTC Implementation Plan Task Force. A task force was formed to
assist FRA in developing a model template for a successful PTC
Implementation Plan (PTCIP), and in development of an example
associated Risk Prioritization Methodology. PTCIPs are required to be
submitted by April 16, 2010, under the mandate of the RSIA. FRA posted
a final version of a PTCIP template and an example risk prioritization
methodology model for prioritization of line segment implementation to
the FRA public Web site on January 12, 2010, the same day the final
rule was made available for public review. No further meetings of this
task force are currently scheduled. Contact: Tom McFarlin, (202) 493-
6203.
PTC Risk Evaluation Task Force. The creation of the PTC Risk
Evaluation Task Force was approved by the PTC Working Group on April 1,
2010, to develop a computer model to estimate the risk of PTC-
preventable accidents on a line segment basis. The group was formed by
nominations from members of the PTC Working Group and the kickoff
meeting was held via GoTo/Webinar on June 17, 2010. A followup meeting
was held on August 3, 2010, and an additional followup GoTo/Webinar
meeting was held on September 7, 2010. No additional meetings are
scheduled at this time. Contact: Mark Hartong, (202) 493-1332.
Task No. 08-07--Conductor Certification. This task was accepted on
December 10, 2008, to develop regulations for certification of railroad
conductors, as required by the RSIA, and to consider any appropriate
related amendments to existing regulations and report recommendations
for proposed or interim final rule (as determined by FRA in
consultation with the Office of the Secretary of Transportation and the
Office of Management and Budget) by October 16, 2009. The Conductor
Certification Working Group was officially formed by nominations from
member organizations in April 2009, and the first meeting was held on
July 21-23, 2009. Additional meetings were held on August 25-27, 2009;
September 15-17, 2009; October 20-22, 2009; November 17-19, 2009; and
December 16-18, 2009. Tentative consensus was reached on the vast
majority of the regulatory text. The working group approved the draft
rule text by electronic ballot and the consensus draft language was
approved by the RSAC on March 18, 2010, by unanimous vote as the
recommendation from the Committee to the FRA Administrator. The
resulting NPRM was published in
[[Page 73003]]
the Federal Register on November 10, 2010 (75 FR 69166) and the working
group was called back to meet and review comments received on May 12,
2011, and the final rule is currently under development with a target
publication date of November 2012. This rulemaking would provide rules
and guidance for requisite train conductor certification to ensure that
individuals have the knowledge and skills necessary to perform the
duties of a train conductor. This rulemaking may propose that each
railroad adopt and comply with a written program for certifying and
recertifying the qualifications of conductors. After the final rule is
published, the working group will reconvene to make conforming
amendments to the locomotive engineer certification regulation as
appropriate. Contact: Mark McKeon, (202) 493-6350.
Task No. 09--01--Passenger Hours of Service. This task was accepted
on April 2, 2009, to provide advice regarding development of
implementing regulations for the hours of service of operating
employees of commuter and intercity passenger railroads under the RSIA.
The group has been tasked to review available data concerning the
effects of fatigue on the performance of subject employees and consider
the role of fatigue prevention in determining maximum hours of service.
The group has also been tasked to consider the potential for
alternative approaches to hours of service using available tools for
evaluating the impact of various crew schedules and determine the
effect of alternative approaches on the availability of employees to
support passenger service. The group is charged to report whether
existing hours of service restrictions are effective in preventing
fatigue among subject employees, whether an alternative approach to
hours of service for the subject employees would enhance safety and
whether alternative restrictions on hours of service could be coupled
with other fatigue countermeasures to promote the fitness of employees
for safety-critical duties. The Passenger Hours of Service Working
Group was officially formed through the formal Committee member
nomination process in May 2009, and the first meeting was held on June
24, 2009. Followup working group meetings were held on February 2-3,
2010; March 4-5, 2010; April 6, 2010; May 20, 2010; and June 29, 2010.
Consensus has been reached on a majority of the issues and the draft
rule text has been matured. A Passenger Hours of Service Task Force was
formed to review collected data and provide recommendations to the
working group. The task force met on January 14-15, 2010; March 30-31,
2010; and June 16, 2010. The working group approved the draft rule text
by electronic ballot on September 22, 2010, and the consensus draft
language was approved by the RSAC on October 15, 2010, by unanimous
electronic vote as the recommendation from the Committee to the FRA
Administrator. The working group met on December 9, 2010, to discuss
the approved consensus language and the NPRM preamble and the resulting
NPRM was published on March 22, 2011 (76 FR 16200), and the final rule
was published on August 12, 2011 (76 FR 50360), with an effective date
of October 15, 2011. Contact: Mark McKeon, (202) 493-6350.
Task No. 09-02--Critical Incident Programs. This task was accepted
on September 10, 2009, to provide advice regarding development of
implementing regulations for Critical Incident Stress Plans as required
by the RSIA. The group has been tasked to define what a ``critical
incident'' is that requires a response; review available data,
literature, and standards of practice concerning critical incident
programs to determine appropriate action when a railroad employee is
involved in or directly witnesses a critical incident; review any
evaluation studies available for existing railroad critical incident
programs; describe program elements appropriate for the rail
environment, including those requirements set forth in the RSIA;
provide an example of a suitable plan (template); and assist in the
preparation of an NPRM no later than December 2010. In late March 2011,
FRA leadership decided to request that the RSAC be asked to amend the
Critical Incident task statement to remove reference to the Medical
Standards Working Group and to allow the group to assume full working
group status to expedite the work. The Committee approved the revised
task statement with a target date for recommendations to the Committee
of December 2011. The Critical Incident Working Group kickoff meeting
was held on June 24, 2011. The draft report assessing current knowledge
of post-traumatic interventions and to advance evidence-based
recommendations for controlling the risks associated with traumatic
exposure in the railroad setting was completed and distributed to the
working group prior to the September 8-9, 2011, working group meeting.
Due to the aggressive timeline, the working group held its second
meeting on October 11-12, 2011 with a follow-on meeting scheduled for
December 13-14, 2011. Contact: Ron Hynes, (202) 493-6404.
Task No. 10-01--Minimum Training Standards and Plans. This task was
accepted on March 18, 2010, to establish minimum training standards for
each class and craft of safety-related railroad employee and their
railroad contractor and subcontractor equivalents, as required by RSIA.
The group has been tasked to assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate, while ensuring generally
accepted principles of adult learning are employed in training and
development and delivery; determine a reasonable method for submission
and FRA review of training plans which takes human resource limitations
into account; establish reasonable oversight criteria to ensure
training plans are effective, using the operational tests and
inspections requirements of 49 CFR Part 217 as a model. The Training
Standards Working Group was officially formed through the formal
Committee member nomination process in March 2010, and the first
meeting was held on April 13-14, 2010. A followup working group meeting
was held on June 2-3, 2010, and additional followup meetings were
scheduled for August 17-18 and September 21-22, 2010. A Task Analysis
Task Force was formed under the working group to develop a task
analysis template and met in Florence, KY, on June 22-23, 2010, with
CSX Transportation hosting the event. The group developed a 21-page
task analysis document for an outbound train yard carman position,
which is complete regarding FRA railroad safety laws, regulations, and
orders. The working group met August 17-18, and October 19-20, 2010,
and by GoTo/Webinar on November 15-16, 2010. The working group reached
consensus and the resulting training standards draft regulatory
language was presented to and approved by the RSAC Committee on
December 14, 2010. This rulemaking will (1) Establish minimum training
standards for each class or craft of safety-related employee and
equivalent railroad contractor and subcontractor employee that require
railroads, contractors, and subcontractors to qualify or otherwise
document the proficiency of such employees in each such class and craft
regarding their knowledge and ability to comply with Federal railroad
safety laws and regulations and railroad rules and procedures intended
to implement those laws and regulations, etc.; (2) require submission
of railroads', contractors', and subcontractors' training and
qualification programs for FRA approval; and (3) establish a
[[Page 73004]]
minimum training curriculum and ongoing training criteria, testing, and
skills evaluation measures for track and equipment inspectors employed
by railroads and railroad contractor and subcontractors. The resulting
NPRM is under development with a target publication date of January
2012. No additional working group meetings are scheduled at this time.
Contact: Michael Logue, (202) 493-6301.
Task No. 10-02--Safety Technology in Dark Territory. This task was
accepted on September 23, 2010, to provide advice regarding development
of standards, guidance, regulations, or orders governing the
development, use, and implementation of rail safety technology in dark
territory, as required by Section 406 of the RSIA. Specifically, to
assist FRA in developing regulations responsive to the legislative
mandate and to report recommendations to the FRA Administrator for
proposed or interim final rule (as determined by FRA in consultation
with the Office of the Secretary of Transportation and the Office of
Management and Budget) by September 30, 2011. This rulemaking would
issue standards or guidance governing development and deployment of
technology to promote safe operation in non-signaled territory in
arrangements not defined in signal inspection law. The delay in
starting this effort was caused by the PTC rulemaking, which required
the same key personnel both in government and industry. With the PTC
effort maturing, resources became available and the Dark Territory
Working Group was formed to assist FRA in developing regulations
responsive to the legislative mandate and to report recommendations to
the FRA Administrator for proposed or interim final rule (as determined
by FRA in consultation with OST and OMB). The working group met on
March 3-4, 2011, May 9-10, 2011, and September 6-7, 2011 and created
four task forces to investigate specific subject areas. A follow-on
meeting is scheduled for November 17-18, 2011, and the target date for
reporting recommendations to the RSAC Committee is December 2011.
Contact: Olga Cataldi, (202) 493-6321.
Task No. 11-01--Preventing Railroad Employee Distractions Caused by
Personal Electronic Devices. This task was accepted on May 20, 2011, to
prescribe mitigation strategies, programs and processes for governing
the use of personal electronic devices that could cause distractions to
railroad employees engaged in safety-critical activities. This working
group will explore additional methods to achieve compliance through
education, peer-to-peer intervention, counseling and other cooperative,
non-regulatory/punitive methods. The Electronic Device Distraction
Working Group was formed and held its kickoff meeting on October 25-26,
2011. The group is scheduled to meet next on January 11-12, 2011.
Contact: Miriam Kloeppel, (202) 493-6224.
Task No. 11-02--Track Inspection Time Study. This task was accepted
by the Committee electronically on August 16, 2011, to consider
specific improvements to the Track Safety Standards or other responsive
actions related to the Track Inspection Time Study required by Sections
403 (a)-(c) of the RSIA and other relevant studies and resources.
Sections 403(a) and (b) of the RSIA required a study of inspection
practices and the amount of time required for inspections under the
Track Safety Standards, and another set of revisions to those
regulations. The report was due by October 16, 2010, on the results of
a specified track inspection time and track safety study. FRA is
expected to make recommendations for rule changes and, under Section
403(c), not later than 2 years after completion of the study, prescribe
regulations based on its results. FRA organized an independent study by
an outside contractor and developed a questionnaire used to get
information from railroad track inspectors throughout the country;
interviews with railroad and union officials were also conducted for
additional perspectives. The Track Inspection Time Study was completed
and signed by the Secretary on May 2, 2011, starting the 2-year
timeline for rulemaking. The task was given to the Track Standards
Working Group and it held a kickoff meeting on October 20, 2011, and
follow-on meetings are scheduled for December 20-21, 2011; February 7-
8, and April 26-27, 2012. Contact: Ken Rusk, (202) 493-6236.
Completed Tasks
Task 96-1--(Completed) Revising the freight power brake
regulations.
Task 96-2--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to the
Track Safety Standards (49 CFR Part 213).
Task 96-3--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to the
Radio Standards and Procedures (49 CFR Part 220).
Task 96-5--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to
Steam Locomotive Inspection Standards (49 CFR Part 230).
Task 96-6--(Completed) Reviewing and recommending revisions to
miscellaneous aspects of the regulations addressing locomotive engineer
certification (49 CFR Part 240).
Task 96-7--(Completed) Developing roadway maintenance machines (on-
track equipment) safety standards.
Task 96-8--(Completed) This planning task evaluated the need for
action responsive to recommendations contained in a report to Congress
titled, Locomotive Crashworthiness & Working Conditions.
Task 97-1--(Completed) Developing crashworthiness specifications
(49 CFR Part 229) to promote the integrity of the locomotive cab in
accidents resulting from collisions.
Task 97-2--(Completed) Evaluating the extent to which
environmental, sanitary, and other working conditions in locomotive
cabs affect the crew's health and the safe operation of locomotives,
proposing standards where appropriate.
Task 97-3--(Completed) Developing event recorder data survivability
standards.
Task 97-4 and Task 97-5--(Completed) Defining PTC functionalities,
describing available technologies, evaluating costs and benefits of
potential systems, and considering implementation opportunities and
challenges, including demonstration and deployment.
Task 97-6--(Completed) Revising various regulations to address the
safety implications of processor-based signal and train control
technologies, including communications-based operating systems.
Task 97-7--(Completed) Determining damages qualifying an event as a
reportable train accident.
Task 00-1--(Completed--task withdrawn) Determining the need to
amend regulations protecting persons who work on, under, or between
rolling equipment and persons applying, removing, or inspecting rear
end marking devices (Blue Signal Protection).
Task 01-1--(Completed) Developing conformity of FRA's regulations
for accident/incident reporting (49 CFR Part 225) to revised
regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, and to make appropriate revisions to the FRA Guide
for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports (Reporting Guide).
Task 08-01--(Completed) Report on the Nation's railroad bridges.
Report to FRA on the current state of railroad bridge safety
management; update the findings and conclusions of the 1993 Summary
Report of the FRA Railroad Bridge Safety Survey.
[[Page 73005]]
Task No. 08-06--(Completed) Hours of Service Recordkeeping and
Reporting. Develop revised recordkeeping and reporting requirements for
hours of service of railroad employees. Final rule published May 27,
2009, with an effective date of July 16, 2009. (74 FR 25330).
Task No. 08-05--(Completed) Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance.
Develop a rule encompassing the requirements of Section 417 of the RSIA
(Railroad Bridge Safety Assurance), of RSIA bridge failure. Final rule
published July 15, 2010 (75 FR-41282).
Task 06-02--(Completed) Track Safety Standards and CWR. Issue
requirements for inspection of joint bars in CWR to detect cracks that
could affect the integrity of the track structure published a final
rule on August 25, 2009, with correcting amendment published on October
21, 2009.
Please refer to the notice published in the Federal Register on
March 11, 1996, (61 FR 9740) for more information about the RSAC.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 21, 2011.
Brenda J. Moscoso,
Director, Office of Safety Analysis, Risk Reduction, and Crossing/
Trespasser Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-30476 Filed 11-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P