Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 72350-72353 [2011-30223]
Download as PDF
72350
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(4) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the accessory
gearbox or transfer gearbox, or both.
(5) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the fan forward
case.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make
your request.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Stephen Sheely, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: (781) 238–7750; fax: (781)
238–7199; email: stephen.k.sheely@faa.gov.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
November 15, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–30137 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1253; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–079–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
airplanes that would supersede an
existing AD. This proposed AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main
Landing Gear (MLG) support Rib 5 fitting lug
bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. * * * If not detected, the
cracking may lead to the complete failure of
the fitting and thus could affect the structural
integrity of the MLG installation.
EASA AD 2007–0213 was issued to
address this condition * * *.
After that AD was issued, a case of Rib 5,
ruptured at the 4 o’clock position, was
discovered on an aeroplane on which the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
terminating action of EASA AD 2007–0213
had already been embodied * * *.
Investigation of that case revealed that
corrosion damage and cracking that should
have been removed by repair machining was
below the level of detectability of the Non
Destructive Test (NDT) technique that
cleared the surfaces prior to bush
installation.
Comments Invited
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (425) 227–
1221.
Discussion
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.
gov; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Washington 98057–3356; phone: (425)
227–1405; fax: (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1253; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–079–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
On March 31, 2008, we issued AD
2008–08–04, Amendment 39–15456 (73
FR 19975, April 14, 2008). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on Airbus Model
A318, A319, A320, and A321 airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2008–08–04,
Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR 19975,
April 14, 2008), we have been advised
that the existing AD is inadequate to
address the unsafe condition. We have
determined that certain airplanes need
additional detailed inspections for
cracks of the MLG support 5 fitting, and
repair of any cracks found. The
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0011,
dated January 21, 2011 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main
Landing Gear (MLG) support Rib 5 fitting lug
bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. In some instances, corrosion pits
caused the cracking of the forward lug
(sometimes through its complete thickness).
If not detected, the cracking may lead to the
complete failure of the fitting and thus could
affect the structural integrity of the MLG
installation.
EASA AD 2007–0213 [dated August 7,
2007, which corresponds to FAA AD 2008–
08–04, Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR 19975,
April 14, 2008)] was issued to address this
condition and required a repetitive
inspection program of the MLG support Rib
5 fitting forward lugs and, as terminating
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
action, the embodiment of Airbus Service
Bulletin (SB) A320–57–1118.
After that [EASA] AD was issued, a case of
Rib 5, ruptured at the 4 o’clock position, was
discovered on an aeroplane on which the
terminating action of EASA AD 2007–0213
had already been embodied in accordance
with Airbus SB A320–57–1118.
Investigation of that case revealed that
corrosion damage and cracking that should
have been removed by repair machining was
below the level of detectability of the Non
Destructive Test (NDT) technique that
cleared the surfaces prior to bush
installation.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could affect the structural integrity
of the aeroplane.
It has also been established that all A318
aeroplanes have had Airbus modification
32025 embodied in production on both LH
and RH wings, which is a one-way
interchangeable (non-reversible)
modification. Consequently, the unsafe
condition addressed by AD 2007–0231
cannot occur or develop on those aeroplanes.
For the reasons described above, this AD,
which supersedes EASA AD 2007–0213:
—Retains the requirements of EASA AD
2007–0213 for aeroplanes on which the
MLG Rib Bushes have not been modified/
repaired in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus SB A320–57–1118,
or Airbus SRM 57–26–13, or the identified
Airbus Repair Instructions, as applicable,
and
—Requires, for all aeroplanes on which
Airbus SB A320–57–1118 has been
embodied in service, or on which Airbus
SRM 57–26–13 or the identified Airbus
Repair Instructions have been applied, a
repetitive inspection program [for cracks]
of the MLG support Rib 5 fitting forward
lugs and, depending on findings, the
accomplishment of the associated
corrective actions [i.e., repair], and
—Reduces the Applicability by deleting
A318 aeroplanes.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletins A320–57–1118, Revision 04,
dated June 4, 2008; and A320–57A1166,
dated January 12, 2011. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 740 products of U.S.
registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2008–08–04, Amendment 39–15456 (73
FR 19975, April 14, 2008), and retained
in this proposed AD take about 73 workhours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work hour. Required
parts would cost about $3,860 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these parts. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the
currently required actions is $10,065 per
product.
We estimate that it would take about
3 work-hours per product to comply
with the new basic requirements of this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the new
actions in this proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be up to $188,700, or $255
per product.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72351
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR
19975, April 14, 2008) and adding the
following new AD:
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
72352
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2011–1253;
Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–079–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
9, 2012.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008–08–04,
Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR 19975, April
14, 2008).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319–
111, A319–112, A319–113, A319–114, A319–
115, A319–131, A319–132, A319–133, A320–
111, A320 –211, A320 –212, A320–214,
A320–231, A320–232, A320–233, A321–111,
A321–112, A321–131, A321–211, A321–212,
A321–213, A321–231, and A321–232
airplanes; certificated in any category, except
airplanes on which Airbus modification
32025 has been accomplished in production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main
Landing Gear (MLG) support Rib 5 fitting lug
bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. * * * If not detected, the
cracking may lead to the complete failure of
the fitting and thus could affect the structural
integrity of the MLG installation.
EASA AD 2007–0213 was issued to
address this condition * * *.
After that [EASA] AD was issued, a case of
Rib 5, ruptured at the 4 o’clock position, was
discovered on an aeroplane on which the
terminating action of EASA AD 2007–0213
had already been embodied * * *.
Investigation of that case revealed that
corrosion damage and cracking that should
have been removed by repair machining was
below the level of detectability of the Non
Destructive Test (NDT) technique that
cleared the surfaces prior to bush
installation.
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD
2006–11–04, Amendment 39–14608 (71 FR
29578, May 23, 2006), With Changes to NDT
References
Repetitive Detailed Inspections
(g) Within 8 days after June 7, 2006 (the
effective date of AD 2006–11–04,
Amendment 39–14608 (71 FR 29578, May 23,
2006)), or before further flight after a hard
landing, whichever is first: Perform a
detailed inspection for cracking in the
forward lug of the support rib 5 fitting of the
left- and right-hand MLG, and, if any crack
is found, replace the MLG fitting with a new
fitting before further flight, in accordance
with a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent); or in
accordance with the actions specified in the
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Nondestructive Testing Manual, Chapter 51–
90–00, Revision dated February 1, 2003.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 8 days, or before further flight
after a hard landing, whichever is first. As of
May 19, 2008 (the effective date of AD 2008–
08–04, Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR 19975,
April 14, 2008)), the repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (k) of this AD must be
accomplished in lieu of the repetitive
inspections required by this paragraph.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
Optional Inspection Method
(h) Performing an ultrasonic inspection for
cracking in the forward lug of the support rib
5 fitting of the left- and right-hand MLG in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, or
the EASA (or its delegated agent; or in
accordance with the Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Nondestructive Testing Manual,
Chapter 57–29–03, Revision dated February
1, 2005 (for Model A318, A319, and A320
airplanes), or Chapter 57–29–04, Revision
dated May 1, 2005 (for Model A321
airplanes); or in accordance with Task 57–
29–03–270–801–A–01, Inspection of the Gear
Rib Forward and Aft Lug Attachment for the
Main Gear, of Chapter 57, Wings, of the
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Nondestructive Testing Manual, Revision 89,
dated August 1, 2011; as applicable; is an
acceptable alternative method of compliance
for the initial and repetitive inspections
required by paragraph (g) of this AD. As of
the effective date of this AD, only Task 57–
29–03–270–801–A–01, Inspection of the Gear
Rib Forward and Aft Lug Attachment for the
Main Gear, of Chapter 57, Wings, of the
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Nondestructive Testing Manual, Revision 89,
dated August 1, 2011, may be used.
Optional Terminating Action
(i) Repair of the forward lugs of the support
rib 5 fitting of the left- and right-hand MLG,
done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116; or
the EASA (or its delegated agent); or in
accordance with Airbus A319 Structural
Repair Manual (SRM), Paragraph 5.C., 57–
26–13, Revision November 1, 2004; Airbus
A320 SRM, Paragraph 5.D, 57–26–13,
Revision November 1, 2004; or Airbus A321
SRM, Paragraph 5.D, 57–26–13, Revision
February 1, 2005; as applicable; constitutes
terminating action for the requirements of
paragraphs (g), (h), (k), (l), and (m) of this AD.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008–
08–04, Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR 19975,
April 14, 2008), With Revised Affected
Airplanes
Referenced Conditions
(j) To identify affected airplanes in
paragraphs (k), (m), and (o) of this AD, this
AD refers to the following conditions:
(1) Airplanes on which the modification of
the MLG rib bushes as specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–57–1118 has been
done.
(2) Airplanes on which a repair of the MLG
support rib 5 fitting specified in Airbus A319
Structural Repair Manual (SRM) 57–26–13,
paragraph 5.C; or Airbus A320/A321 SRM
57–26–13, paragraph 5.D; or Airbus Repair
Instruction R572–58376, Issue C, dated
October 15, 2000; has been done.
(3) Airplanes on which replacement in
service of the MLG support rib 5 as specified
in Airbus Repair Instructions R572–58507
and R572–58209, or Airbus Repair
Instructions R572–45020 and R572–45019, as
applicable, has been done.
Repetitive Inspections
(k) For airplanes on which none of the
actions specified in paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2),
and (j)(3) of this AD have been done: At the
applicable time specified in table 1 of this
AD, or before further flight after a hard
landing, whichever is first, do a visual
inspection or ultrasonic inspection for
cracking in the forward lug of the support rib
5 fitting of the left and right MLG, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
57–1138, Revision 01, dated October 27,
2006. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable interval specified in table 1 of this
AD or before further flight after a hard
landing, whichever is first, until the
modification required by paragraph (m) of
this AD has been accomplished.
Accomplishing the initial inspection
terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)
of this AD.
TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES
Airplanes
Initial inspection
Repetitive interval
Model A319 and A320 airplanes ....
If the most recent inspection is a detailed inspection done in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD, inspect within 150 flight cycles
after the most recent detailed inspection.
Within 150 flight cycles after a visual inspection.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
72353
TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES—Continued
Airplanes
Initial inspection
Model A321 airplanes .....................
Repetitive interval
If the most recent inspection is an ultrasonic inspection done in accordance with paragraph (h) of this AD, inspect within 940 flight cycles after the most recent ultrasonic inspection.
If the most recent inspection is a detailed inspection done in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD, inspect within 100 flight cycles
after the most recent detailed inspection.
If the most recent inspection is an ultrasonic inspection done in accordance with paragraph (h) of this AD, inspect within 630 flight cycles after the most recent ultrasonic inspection.
Within 940 flight cycles after an ultrasonic inspection.
Corrective Action
(l) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (k) of this
AD: Before further flight, repair or replace the
cracked MLG fitting using a method
approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, or the EASA (or
its delegated agent).
Rib Bushing Modification
(m) Except for airplanes on which the
actions specified in paragraph (j)(3) have
been done: Within 60 months after May 19,
2008, modify the rib bushings of the left and
right MLG, by accomplishing all of the
applicable actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–57–1118, Revision 03,
dated April 23, 2007; or Revision 04, dated
June 4, 2008. Accomplishing this
modification terminates the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (k) of this AD, and then
the requirements of paragraph (o) of this AD
must be done.
Credit for Actions Done According to
Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(n) Modifying the lugs of the support rib
5 fitting of the left and right MLG is
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (m) of this AD if
done before May 19, 2008, in accordance
with one of the following service bulletins:
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–57–1118,
dated September 5, 2002; Revision 01, dated
August 28, 2003; or Revision 02, dated
August 2, 2006.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
NEW REQUIREMENTS OF THIS AD
Post-Modification/Post-Repair Inspections
(o) For airplanes on which the actions
specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this
AD have been done: At the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (o)(1) and (o)(2) of
this AD, do a detailed inspection for cracks
of the forward lug of each left-hand and righthand MLG support rib 5 fitting, in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–57A1166, dated January 12, 2011.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 500 flight cycles.
(1) Within 2,000 flight cycles after
accomplishing the modification specified in
paragraph (j)(1) or (m) of this AD, or the
repair specified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD,
as applicable.
(2) Within 250 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, without exceeding
3 months after the effective date of this AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
Within 100 flight cycles after a visual inspection.
Within 630 flight cycles after an ultrasonic inspection.
(p) If any crack is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (o) of this
AD: Before further flight, repair using a
method approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA; or
EASA (or its delegated agent).
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to ensure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Optional Terminating Action
(q) Replacement of a MLG support rib 5
fitting at any position (LH or RH) as specified
in paragraph (j)(3) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this AD for the MLG support
rib 5 fitting at that position.
Related Information
(s) For related information, refer to MCAI
EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011–0011,
dated January 21, 2011; Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–57–1118, Revision 03, dated
April 23, 2007, Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A320–57–1118, Revision 04, dated
June 4, 2008; Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
57–1138, Revision 01, dated October 27,
2006; Airbus A319 Structural Repair Manual
(SRM), Paragraph 5.C., 57–26–13, Revision
dated November 1, 2004; Airbus A320 SRM,
Paragraph 5.D., 57–26–13, Revision dated
November 1, 2004; Airbus A321 SRM,
Paragraph 5.D., 57–26–13, Revision dated
February 1, 2005; and Task 57–29–03–270–
801–A–01, Inspection of the Gear Rib
Forward and Aft Lug Attachment for the
Main Gear, of Chapter 57, Wings, of the
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Nondestructive Testing Manual, Revision 89,
dated August 1, 2011.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
Although the MCAI or service information
allows further flight after cracks are found
during compliance with certain required
actions, paragraphs (l) and (p) of this AD
require repair or replacement before further
flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(r) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; phone: (425) 227–1405; fax: (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD. AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2006–11–04,
Amendment 39–14608 (71 FR 29578, May 23,
2006), and AD 2008–08–04, Amendment 39–
15456 (73 FR 19975, April 14, 2008), are not
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 14, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–30223 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1194; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NE–36–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all Pratt
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72350-72353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30223]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1253; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-079-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 airplanes that would
supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main Landing Gear (MLG)
support Rib 5 fitting lug bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. * * * If not detected, the cracking may lead to the
complete failure of the fitting and thus could affect the structural
integrity of the MLG installation.
EASA AD 2007-0213 was issued to address this condition * * *.
After that AD was issued, a case of Rib 5, ruptured at the 4
o'clock position, was discovered on an aeroplane on which the
terminating action of EASA AD 2007-0213 had already been embodied *
* *.
Investigation of that case revealed that corrosion damage and
cracking that should have been removed by repair machining was below
the level of detectability of the Non Destructive Test (NDT)
technique that cleared the surfaces prior to bush installation.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (425) 227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: (425) 227-
1405; fax: (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1253;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-079-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On March 31, 2008, we issued AD 2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456 (73
FR 19975, April 14, 2008). That AD required actions intended to address
an unsafe condition on Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321
airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456 (73 FR 19975,
April 14, 2008), we have been advised that the existing AD is
inadequate to address the unsafe condition. We have determined that
certain airplanes need additional detailed inspections for cracks of
the MLG support 5 fitting, and repair of any cracks found. The European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the
Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011-0011, dated January 21, 2011 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main Landing Gear (MLG)
support Rib 5 fitting lug bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. In some instances, corrosion pits caused the cracking of
the forward lug (sometimes through its complete thickness). If not
detected, the cracking may lead to the complete failure of the
fitting and thus could affect the structural integrity of the MLG
installation.
EASA AD 2007-0213 [dated August 7, 2007, which corresponds to
FAA AD 2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456 (73 FR 19975, April 14, 2008)]
was issued to address this condition and required a repetitive
inspection program of the MLG support Rib 5 fitting forward lugs
and, as terminating
[[Page 72351]]
action, the embodiment of Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A320-57-1118.
After that [EASA] AD was issued, a case of Rib 5, ruptured at
the 4 o'clock position, was discovered on an aeroplane on which the
terminating action of EASA AD 2007-0213 had already been embodied in
accordance with Airbus SB A320-57-1118.
Investigation of that case revealed that corrosion damage and
cracking that should have been removed by repair machining was below
the level of detectability of the Non Destructive Test (NDT)
technique that cleared the surfaces prior to bush installation.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the aeroplane.
It has also been established that all A318 aeroplanes have had
Airbus modification 32025 embodied in production on both LH and RH
wings, which is a one-way interchangeable (non-reversible)
modification. Consequently, the unsafe condition addressed by AD
2007-0231 cannot occur or develop on those aeroplanes.
For the reasons described above, this AD, which supersedes EASA
AD 2007-0213:
--Retains the requirements of EASA AD 2007-0213 for aeroplanes on
which the MLG Rib Bushes have not been modified/repaired in
accordance with the instructions of Airbus SB A320-57-1118, or
Airbus SRM 57-26-13, or the identified Airbus Repair Instructions,
as applicable, and
--Requires, for all aeroplanes on which Airbus SB A320-57-1118 has
been embodied in service, or on which Airbus SRM 57-26-13 or the
identified Airbus Repair Instructions have been applied, a
repetitive inspection program [for cracks] of the MLG support Rib 5
fitting forward lugs and, depending on findings, the accomplishment
of the associated corrective actions [i.e., repair], and
--Reduces the Applicability by deleting A318 aeroplanes.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletins A320-57-1118,
Revision 04, dated June 4, 2008; and A320-57A1166, dated January 12,
2011. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 740 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456
(73 FR 19975, April 14, 2008), and retained in this proposed AD take
about 73 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per
work hour. Required parts would cost about $3,860 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions is
$10,065 per product.
We estimate that it would take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the new actions in this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
up to $188,700, or $255 per product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15456 (73 FR
19975, April 14, 2008) and adding the following new AD:
[[Page 72352]]
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2011-1253; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-
079-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 9, 2012.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456 (73 FR
19975, April 14, 2008).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319-111, A319-112, A319-
113, A319-114, A319-115, A319-131, A319-132, A319-133, A320-111,
A320 -211, A320 -212, A320-214, A320-231, A320-232, A320-233, A321-
111, A321-112, A321-131, A321-211, A321-212, A321-213, A321-231, and
A321-232 airplanes; certificated in any category, except airplanes
on which Airbus modification 32025 has been accomplished in
production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main Landing Gear (MLG)
support Rib 5 fitting lug bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. * * * If not detected, the cracking may lead to the
complete failure of the fitting and thus could affect the structural
integrity of the MLG installation.
EASA AD 2007-0213 was issued to address this condition * * *.
After that [EASA] AD was issued, a case of Rib 5, ruptured at
the 4 o'clock position, was discovered on an aeroplane on which the
terminating action of EASA AD 2007-0213 had already been embodied *
* *.
Investigation of that case revealed that corrosion damage and
cracking that should have been removed by repair machining was below
the level of detectability of the Non Destructive Test (NDT)
technique that cleared the surfaces prior to bush installation.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD 2006-11-04, Amendment 39-
14608 (71 FR 29578, May 23, 2006), With Changes to NDT References
Repetitive Detailed Inspections
(g) Within 8 days after June 7, 2006 (the effective date of AD
2006-11-04, Amendment 39-14608 (71 FR 29578, May 23, 2006)), or
before further flight after a hard landing, whichever is first:
Perform a detailed inspection for cracking in the forward lug of the
support rib 5 fitting of the left- and right-hand MLG, and, if any
crack is found, replace the MLG fitting with a new fitting before
further flight, in accordance with a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA; or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent); or in
accordance with the actions specified in the Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 Nondestructive Testing Manual, Chapter 51-90-00, Revision dated
February 1, 2003. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 8 days, or before further flight after a hard landing,
whichever is first. As of May 19, 2008 (the effective date of AD
2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456 (73 FR 19975, April 14, 2008)), the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (k) of this AD must be
accomplished in lieu of the repetitive inspections required by this
paragraph.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Optional Inspection Method
(h) Performing an ultrasonic inspection for cracking in the
forward lug of the support rib 5 fitting of the left- and right-hand
MLG in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, or the EASA (or its delegated agent;
or in accordance with the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Nondestructive
Testing Manual, Chapter 57-29-03, Revision dated February 1, 2005
(for Model A318, A319, and A320 airplanes), or Chapter 57-29-04,
Revision dated May 1, 2005 (for Model A321 airplanes); or in
accordance with Task 57-29-03-270-801-A-01, Inspection of the Gear
Rib Forward and Aft Lug Attachment for the Main Gear, of Chapter 57,
Wings, of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Nondestructive Testing
Manual, Revision 89, dated August 1, 2011; as applicable; is an
acceptable alternative method of compliance for the initial and
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD. As of
the effective date of this AD, only Task 57-29-03-270-801-A-01,
Inspection of the Gear Rib Forward and Aft Lug Attachment for the
Main Gear, of Chapter 57, Wings, of the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Nondestructive Testing Manual, Revision 89, dated August 1, 2011,
may be used.
Optional Terminating Action
(i) Repair of the forward lugs of the support rib 5 fitting of
the left- and right-hand MLG, done before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116; or the EASA (or its delegated agent);
or in accordance with Airbus A319 Structural Repair Manual (SRM),
Paragraph 5.C., 57-26-13, Revision November 1, 2004; Airbus A320
SRM, Paragraph 5.D, 57-26-13, Revision November 1, 2004; or Airbus
A321 SRM, Paragraph 5.D, 57-26-13, Revision February 1, 2005; as
applicable; constitutes terminating action for the requirements of
paragraphs (g), (h), (k), (l), and (m) of this AD.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456 (73 FR
19975, April 14, 2008), With Revised Affected Airplanes
Referenced Conditions
(j) To identify affected airplanes in paragraphs (k), (m), and
(o) of this AD, this AD refers to the following conditions:
(1) Airplanes on which the modification of the MLG rib bushes as
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1118 has been done.
(2) Airplanes on which a repair of the MLG support rib 5 fitting
specified in Airbus A319 Structural Repair Manual (SRM) 57-26-13,
paragraph 5.C; or Airbus A320/A321 SRM 57-26-13, paragraph 5.D; or
Airbus Repair Instruction R572-58376, Issue C, dated October 15,
2000; has been done.
(3) Airplanes on which replacement in service of the MLG support
rib 5 as specified in Airbus Repair Instructions R572-58507 and
R572-58209, or Airbus Repair Instructions R572-45020 and R572-45019,
as applicable, has been done.
Repetitive Inspections
(k) For airplanes on which none of the actions specified in
paragraphs (j)(1), (j)(2), and (j)(3) of this AD have been done: At
the applicable time specified in table 1 of this AD, or before
further flight after a hard landing, whichever is first, do a visual
inspection or ultrasonic inspection for cracking in the forward lug
of the support rib 5 fitting of the left and right MLG, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1138, Revision 01, dated October 27, 2006. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable interval specified in
table 1 of this AD or before further flight after a hard landing,
whichever is first, until the modification required by paragraph (m)
of this AD has been accomplished. Accomplishing the initial
inspection terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
Table 1--Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive
Airplanes Initial inspection interval
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model A319 and A320 airplanes. If the most recent Within 150
inspection is a flight cycles
detailed inspection after a visual
done in accordance inspection.
with paragraph (g) of
this AD, inspect
within 150 flight
cycles after the most
recent detailed
inspection.
[[Page 72353]]
If the most recent Within 940
inspection is an flight cycles
ultrasonic inspection after an
done in accordance ultrasonic
with paragraph (h) of inspection.
this AD, inspect
within 940 flight
cycles after the most
recent ultrasonic
inspection.
Model A321 airplanes.......... If the most recent Within 100
inspection is a flight cycles
detailed inspection after a visual
done in accordance inspection.
with paragraph (g) of
this AD, inspect
within 100 flight
cycles after the most
recent detailed
inspection.
If the most recent Within 630
inspection is an flight cycles
ultrasonic inspection after an
done in accordance ultrasonic
with paragraph (h) of inspection.
this AD, inspect
within 630 flight
cycles after the most
recent ultrasonic
inspection.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corrective Action
(l) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (k) of this AD: Before further flight, repair or replace
the cracked MLG fitting using a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, or the EASA (or its delegated agent).
Rib Bushing Modification
(m) Except for airplanes on which the actions specified in
paragraph (j)(3) have been done: Within 60 months after May 19,
2008, modify the rib bushings of the left and right MLG, by
accomplishing all of the applicable actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1118,
Revision 03, dated April 23, 2007; or Revision 04, dated June 4,
2008. Accomplishing this modification terminates the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (k) of this AD, and then the requirements of
paragraph (o) of this AD must be done.
Credit for Actions Done According to Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(n) Modifying the lugs of the support rib 5 fitting of the left
and right MLG is acceptable for compliance with the requirements of
paragraph (m) of this AD if done before May 19, 2008, in accordance
with one of the following service bulletins: Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-57-1118, dated September 5, 2002; Revision 01, dated August 28,
2003; or Revision 02, dated August 2, 2006.
NEW REQUIREMENTS OF THIS AD
Post-Modification/Post-Repair Inspections
(o) For airplanes on which the actions specified in paragraph
(j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD have been done: At the later of the
times specified in paragraphs (o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD, do a
detailed inspection for cracks of the forward lug of each left-hand
and right-hand MLG support rib 5 fitting, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-57A1166, dated January 12, 2011. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 500 flight cycles.
(1) Within 2,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the
modification specified in paragraph (j)(1) or (m) of this AD, or the
repair specified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
(2) Within 250 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, without exceeding 3 months after the effective date of this AD.
(p) If any crack is detected during any inspection required by
paragraph (o) of this AD: Before further flight, repair using a
method approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-
116, FAA; or EASA (or its delegated agent).
Optional Terminating Action
(q) Replacement of a MLG support rib 5 fitting at any position
(LH or RH) as specified in paragraph (j)(3) of this AD terminates
the requirements of this AD for the MLG support rib 5 fitting at
that position.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Although the MCAI or service information allows further
flight after cracks are found during compliance with certain
required actions, paragraphs (l) and (p) of this AD require repair
or replacement before further flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(r) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: (425)
227-1405; fax: (425) 227-1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD. AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2006-11-04, Amendment 39-14608 (71 FR 29578, May
23, 2006), and AD 2008-08-04, Amendment 39-15456 (73 FR 19975, April
14, 2008), are not approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to ensure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(s) For related information, refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011-0011, dated January 21, 2011; Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-57-1118, Revision 03, dated April 23, 2007, Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A320-57-1118, Revision 04, dated June 4, 2008;
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1138, Revision 01, dated October 27,
2006; Airbus A319 Structural Repair Manual (SRM), Paragraph 5.C.,
57-26-13, Revision dated November 1, 2004; Airbus A320 SRM,
Paragraph 5.D., 57-26-13, Revision dated November 1, 2004; Airbus
A321 SRM, Paragraph 5.D., 57-26-13, Revision dated February 1, 2005;
and Task 57-29-03-270-801-A-01, Inspection of the Gear Rib Forward
and Aft Lug Attachment for the Main Gear, of Chapter 57, Wings, of
the Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Nondestructive Testing Manual,
Revision 89, dated August 1, 2011.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 14, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-30223 Filed 11-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P