Safety Zone; Marco Island Marriott Charity Fireworks Display, Gulf of Mexico, Marco Island, FL, 72369-72371 [2011-30189]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
admittance to the building. Due to space
limitations in the meeting room, an
overflow room has been established in
the Margaret A. Browning Hearing
Room (Room 11000), where persons will
be able to observe the meeting by video
conference. The meeting will also be
available for viewing on the Internet.
Agenda: The meeting will be limited
to issues related to the proposed
amendments to the Board’s rules
governing representation-case
procedures. A copy of the NPRM may
also be obtained from the NLRB’s Web
site at: https://www.nlrb.gov/nprm.
Dated: November 18, 2011.
Mark Gaston Pearce,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2011–30280 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Marine Science
Technician First Class Nolan L.
Ammons, Sector St. Petersburg
Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
telephone (813) 228–2191, email D07SMB-Tampa-WWM@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 7545–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0968]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Marco Island Marriott
Charity Fireworks Display, Gulf of
Mexico, Marco Island, FL
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the
vicinity of Marco Island Marriott Beach
Resort in Marco Island, Florida during
the Marco Island Marriott Charity
Fireworks Display on Friday, February
17, 2012. The safety zone is necessary
to protect the public from the hazards
associated with launching fireworks
over navigable waters of the United
States. Persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the safety zone unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg
or a designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before December 17, 2011. Requests
for public meetings must be received by
the Coast Guard on or before November
30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0968 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0968),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72369
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0968’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0968’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before November 30, 2011
using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
72370
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is the Coast Guard’s authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and
other limited access areas: 33 U.S.C.
1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–
1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public Law
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is
to protect the public from the hazards
associated with the launching of
fireworks over navigable waters of the
United States.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and 12866,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review, direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule has not been designated
a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed this
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866.
The economic impact of this proposed
rule is not significant for the following
reasons: (1) The safety zone would be
enforced for only two hours; (2) vessel
traffic in the area would be minimal
during the enforcement period; (3)
although persons and vessels would not
be able to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the safety zone
without authorization from the Captain
of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated
representative, they would be able to
operate in the surrounding area during
the enforcement period; (4) persons and
vessels would still be able to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone if authorized by
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
a designated representative; and (5) the
Coast Guard would provide advance
notification of the safety zone to the
local maritime community by Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On Friday, February 17, 2012, the
Marco Island Marriott Charity Fireworks
Display is scheduled to take place in
Marco Island, Florida. The fireworks
will be launched from a vessel located
approximately 330 yards west of Marco
Island on the Gulf of Mexico. The
fireworks will explode over the Gulf of
Mexico. The fireworks display is
scheduled to commence at
approximately 8:30 p.m.
The proposed rule would establish a
temporary safety zone that encompasses
certain waters of the Gulf of Mexico in
the vicinity of Marco Island Marriott
Beach Resort in Marco Island, Florida.
The safety zone would be enforced from
8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on February 17,
2012. Enforcement of the safety zone
would begin 30 minutes prior to the
scheduled commencement of the
fireworks display at approximately 8:30
p.m., to ensure the safety zone is clear
of persons and vessels.
Persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the safety zone unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg
or a designated representative. Persons
and vessels would be able to request
authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the safety
zone by contacting the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg by telephone at (727)
824–7524, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel
16, to request authorization. The Coast
Guard would provide notice of the
safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and onscene designated representatives.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entities. This proposed rule may affect
the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of Gulf of Mexico
encompassed within the safety zone
from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on February
17, 2012. For the reasons discussed in
the Regulatory Planning and Review
section above, this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
Marine Science Technician First Class
Nolan L. Ammons, Sector St. Petersburg
Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
telephone (813) 228–2191, email D07SMB-Tampa-WWM@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone, as described in paragraph 34(g) of
the Instruction, that will be enforced for
two hours. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Frm 00041
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0968 to
read as follows:
§ 165.T07–0968 Safety Zone; Marco Island
Marriott Charity Fireworks Display, Gulf of
Mexico, Marco Island, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone. All
waters of the Gulf of Mexico within a
330 yard radius of position 25°55′40″ N,
81°44′03″ W. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations.
Environment
PO 00000
72371
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824–
7524, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted by
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
a designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on
February 17, 2012.
Dated: November 10, 2011.
S.L. Dickinson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port.
[FR Doc. 2011–30189 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72369-72371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30189]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0968]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Marco Island Marriott Charity Fireworks Display,
Gulf of Mexico, Marco Island, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of Marco Island
Marriott Beach Resort in Marco Island, Florida during the Marco Island
Marriott Charity Fireworks Display on Friday, February 17, 2012. The
safety zone is necessary to protect the public from the hazards
associated with launching fireworks over navigable waters of the United
States. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before December 17, 2011. Requests for public meetings must
be received by the Coast Guard on or before November 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0968 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Nolan L.
Ammons, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
telephone (813) 228-2191, email D07-SMB-Tampa-WWM@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0968), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0968'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0968'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before November 30, 2011 using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold
[[Page 72370]]
one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's
authority to establish regulated navigation areas and other limited
access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is to protect the public from the
hazards associated with the launching of fireworks over navigable
waters of the United States.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On Friday, February 17, 2012, the Marco Island Marriott Charity
Fireworks Display is scheduled to take place in Marco Island, Florida.
The fireworks will be launched from a vessel located approximately 330
yards west of Marco Island on the Gulf of Mexico. The fireworks will
explode over the Gulf of Mexico. The fireworks display is scheduled to
commence at approximately 8:30 p.m.
The proposed rule would establish a temporary safety zone that
encompasses certain waters of the Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of
Marco Island Marriott Beach Resort in Marco Island, Florida. The safety
zone would be enforced from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on February 17, 2012.
Enforcement of the safety zone would begin 30 minutes prior to the
scheduled commencement of the fireworks display at approximately 8:30
p.m., to ensure the safety zone is clear of persons and vessels.
Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels would be able to request
authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the safety zone by contacting the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by
telephone at (727) 824-7524, or a designated representative via VHF
radio on channel 16, to request authorization. The Coast Guard would
provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Regulatory Planning and Review, and 12866,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule has not been designated a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this
proposed rule under Executive Order 12866.
The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for
the following reasons: (1) The safety zone would be enforced for only
two hours; (2) vessel traffic in the area would be minimal during the
enforcement period; (3) although persons and vessels would not be able
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone
without authorization from the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative, they would be able to operate in the
surrounding area during the enforcement period; (4) persons and vessels
would still be able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or a designated representative; and (5) the Coast Guard
would provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local
maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators
of vessels intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of Gulf of Mexico encompassed within the safety
zone from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. on February 17, 2012. For the reasons
discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review section above, this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact Marine Science
Technician First Class Nolan L. Ammons, Sector St. Petersburg
Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone (813) 228-2191, email
D07-SMB-Tampa-WWM@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires
[[Page 72371]]
Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary safety zone, as described in
paragraph 34(g) of the Instruction, that will be enforced for two
hours. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.T07-0968 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0968 Safety Zone; Marco Island Marriott Charity
Fireworks Display, Gulf of Mexico, Marco Island, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is a safety zone.
All waters of the Gulf of Mexico within a 330 yard radius of position
25[deg]55'40'' N, 81[deg]44'03'' W. All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated
area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824-7524, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg
or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 8 p.m. until 10
p.m. on February 17, 2012.
Dated: November 10, 2011.
S.L. Dickinson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port.
[FR Doc. 2011-30189 Filed 11-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P