Income of Foreign Governments and International Organizations; Correction, 72367-72368 [2011-30171]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
owned entirely by public shareholders. No
other changes in the ownership of L’s stock
occur prior to December 31, 2010.
(ii) Analysis. The July redemption is a
small redemption because the number of
shares redeemed (60) does not exceed 106,
the small redemption limitation (10 percent
of the number of common shares outstanding
on January 1, 2010). Under paragraph (j)(14)
of this section, the segregation rules of
§ 1.382–2T(j)(2)(iii)(C) do not apply to the
July redemption. Under paragraph (j)(14)(iv)
of this section, Public L is treated as having
all 60 shares redeemed.
(iii) The December redemption is a small
redemption because the number of shares
redeemed (90) does not exceed 106, the small
redemption limitation (10 percent of the
number of common shares outstanding on
January 1, 2010). However, under paragraph
(j)(14)(i) of this section, only 46 of the 90
shares redeemed are exempted from the
segregation rules of § 1.382–2T(j)(2)(iii)(C)
because the total number of shares of
common stock redeemed in the July and
December redemptions exceeds 106, the
small redemption limitation, by 44.
Accordingly, under paragraph (j)(14)(iv) of
this section, Public L is treated as having 46
shares redeemed in the December
redemption. Section 1.382–2T(j)(2)(iii)(C)
applies to the remaining 44 shares redeemed.
Accordingly, Public L is segregated into two
different public groups immediately before
the transaction (and thereafter) so that the
redeemed interests (Public RL) are treated as
part of a public group that is separate from
the ownership interests that are not
redeemed (Public CL). Therefore, as a result
of the December redemption, Public CL’s
interest in L increases by 4.4 percentage
points (from 95.6 percent (956/1,000) to 100
percent (910/910)) on the December 31, 2010
testing date. For purposes of determining
whether an ownership change occurs on any
subsequent testing date having a testing
period that includes such redemption, Public
CL is treated as a 5-percent shareholder
whose percentage ownership interests in L
increased by 4.4 percentage points as a result
of the redemption.
Example 8. Segregation rules
inapplicable—proportionate amount. (i)
Facts. P1 is a corporation that owns 8 percent
of the stock of L. The remaining L stock (92
percent) is owned by Public L. P1 is entirely
owned by Public P1. Excluding cash and cash
items within the meaning of section
382(h)(3)(B)(ii), P1’s investment in L
represents 11 percent of P1’s gross assets. P2
is a corporation owned 90 percent by
individual A and 10 percent by a public
group (Public P2). On May 22, 2013, P1
merges into P2 with the shareholders of P1
receiving an amount of P2 stock equal to 25
percent of the value of P2 immediately after
the reorganization. Following the merger, P2’s
investment in L represents 6 percent of the
combined gross assets of P1 and P2 (excluding
cash and cash items). L was owned 92
percent by Public L and 8 percent by P1
throughout the testing period ending on the
date of the merger.
(ii) Analysis. Assuming L can establish that
P2 owns 10 percent or less (by value) of L on
May 22, 2013 pursuant to the operating rules
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
of paragraph (j)(15)(iv) of this section, the
segregation rules of § 1.382–2T(j)(3)(iii) will
not apply to segregate P1’s direct public
group (Public P1) immediately before the
merger from P2’s direct public group (Public
P2). Thus, following the merger, P2 is owned
67.5 percent (90% × 75%) by A and 32.5
percent (25% + (10% × 75%)) by Public P2.
Pursuant to paragraph (j)(15)(ii)(B) of this
section, Public P2’s lowest percentage of
ownership is the sum of its lowest percentage
of ownership (zero) and a proportionate
amount of former Public P1’s lowest
ownership percentage of L of 2.6 percent
(32.5% × 8%). P2 will be treated as having
one public group whose ownership interest
in L was 2.6 percent before the merger and
remains 2.6 percent after the merger. Because
Public P2 owns less than 5 percent of L,
Public P2 is treated as part of Public L. See
§ 1.382–2T(j)(1)(iv). Thus, pursuant to
paragraph (j)(15)(ii)(B) of this section, Public
L’s lowest ownership percentage of L during
the testing period is 94.6 percent.
Example 9. Segregation rules
inapplicable—prior increase in ownership by
former public group during testing period. (i)
Facts. The facts are the same as Example 8,
except that P1 acquired its 8 percent interest
in L during the testing period that includes
the merger.
(ii) Analysis. Pursuant to the rules of
paragraph (j)(15)(ii)(A) of this section, the
amount of increase in the percentage of stock
ownership by Public P2 is the sum of its
increase and any increase by a former public
group (Public P1). Accordingly, Public P2, the
continuing public group, is treated as having
increased its ownership interest by 2.6
percent, and Public L is treated as increasing
its ownership interest by 2.6 percent.
Example 10. Ownership limitation based
upon fair market value. (i) Facts. L has two
classes of stock outstanding, common stock
and preferred stock. The preferred stock is
stock within the meaning of § 1.382–2(a)(3).
A direct public group (Public L) owns all of
the common stock of L. P purchased 100
percent of the preferred stock of L at a time
when the preferred stock represented 9
percent of the value of all the outstanding
stock of L. The common stock owned by
Public L represents the remaining 91 percent
of the value of the stock of L. P has one class
of common stock outstanding, all of which is
owned by a direct public group (Public P).
On October 7, 2013, P redeems 30 percent of
its single outstanding class of common stock.
Due to a decline in the relative value of the
common stock of L, the preferred stock of L
represents 40 percent of the value of all the
outstanding stock of L on the date of the
redemption.
(ii) Analysis. The rules of paragraph (j)(15)
of this section do not apply to the
redemption because P owns more than 10
percent of L (by value) on that date.
Example 11. Ownership limitation—fair
market value includes preferred stock. The
facts are the same as in Example 10, except
that the preferred stock is not stock within
the meaning of § 1.382–2(a)(3). The results
are the same as in Example 10.
Example 12. Ownership limitation—
application of attribution rules. (i) Facts.
Individual A owns all the outstanding stock
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72367
of X. A also owns preferred stock in Y that
is not stock within the meaning § 1.382–
2(a)(3), which represents 50 percent of the
value of Y. All the Y common stock is owned
by public owners. Each of X and Y own 6
percent of the single class of L stock
outstanding. On October 6, 2013, Y redeems
15 percent of its common stock.
(ii) Analysis. In determining the ownership
limitation of this paragraph, the attribution
rules of section 318(a) apply. Pursuant to
section 318(a)(2), A is treated as owning the
L stock owned by X. Pursuant to section
318(a)(3), Y is treated as owning the L stock
that A indirectly owns. Because Y’s
ownership of L exceeds the ownership
limitation, the rules of paragraph (j)(15) of
this section do not apply.
(17) Effective/applicability date. This
paragraph (j) generally applies to
issuances or deemed issuances of stock
in taxable years beginning on or after
November 4, 1992. However, paragraphs
(j)(13) through (j)(15) and Examples 5
through 12 of paragraph (j)(16) apply to
testing dates occurring on or after the
date these regulations are published as
final regulations in the Federal Register.
See § 1.382–3(j)(14)(ii) and (iii), as
contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised as of
April 1, 1994, for the application of
paragraph (j)(10) to stock issued on the
exercise of certain options exercised on
or after November 4, 1992 and for an
election to apply paragraphs (j)(1)
through (12) retroactively to certain
issuances and deemed issuances of
stock occurring in taxable years prior to
November 4, 1992.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–30290 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 602
[REG–146537–06]
RIN 1545–BG08
Income of Foreign Governments and
International Organizations; Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed
regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains
corrections to a notice of proposed
regulations that were published in the
Federal Register on Thursday,
November 3, 2011. These regulations
provide guidance relating to the taxation
of the income of foreign governments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
72368
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
from investments in the United States.
The regulations affect foreign
governments that derive income from
sources within the United States.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Juster, (202) 622–3850 (not
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–146537–06) that is the subject of
this correction is under sections 892 and
602 of the Internal Revenue Code.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Need for Correction
As published on November 3, 2011
(76 FR 68119), the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–146537–06) contains
errors that may prove to be misleading
and are in need of clarification.
Correction for Publication
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–146537–06) that was
the subject of FR Doc. 2011–28531 is
corrected as follows:
1. On page 68119, column 2, in the
preamble under the paragraph heading
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’, line 17
from the top of the column, the language
‘‘the collection of information should
be’’ is corrected to read ‘‘the collections
of information should be’’.
2. On page 68119, column 2, in the
preamble under the paragraph heading
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’, the first
full paragraph in the column, lines 1
and 2, the language ‘‘Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘Whether the proposed collections
of information are necessary for the
proper’’.
3. On page 68119, column 2, in the
preamble under the paragraph heading
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’, second
paragraph in the column, line 2, the
language ‘‘associate with the proposed
collection’’ is corrected to read
‘‘associate with the proposed
collections’’.
4. On page 68119, column 2, in the
preamble under the paragraph heading
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’, sixth
paragraph in the column, lines 1 and 2,
the language ‘‘The collection of
information in this proposed regulation
is in §§ 1.892–’’ is corrected to read
‘‘The collections of information in this
proposed regulations are in §§ 1.892–’’.
5. On page 68119, column 2, in the
preamble under the paragraph heading
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’, sixth
paragraph in the column, lines 6 and 7,
the language ‘‘tax under section 892.
The collection of information is
voluntary to obtain a’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘tax under section 892. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
collections of information are voluntary
to obtain a’’.
6. On page 68119, column 3, in the
preamble under the paragraph heading
‘‘Background’’, fifth line from the
bottom of the paragraph, the language
‘‘referenced notice of proposed’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘reference notice of
proposed’’.
7. On page 68121, column 1, in the
preamble under the paragraph heading
‘‘Definition of Commercial Activity’’,
third line from the bottom of the last
paragraph, the language ‘‘proposed
regulations revised § 1.892–’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘proposed regulations
revise § 1.892–’’.
8. On page 68122, column 1,
Paragraph 1. The authority citation, line
2, the language ‘‘for parts 1 and 601
continues to read in’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘for part 1 continues to read in’’.
§ 1.892–5
[Corrected]
9. On page 68122, column 3, § 1.892–
5(a)(1), line 2, the paragraph heading
(a)(1) the language ‘‘definition of term
‘‘controlled’’ is corrected to read
‘‘definition of the term ‘‘controlled’’.
10. On page 68123, column 3,
§ 1.892–5(d)(5)(i), line 3, the language
‘‘(d)(5)(ii) or (d)(5)(iii) of this section,
the’’ is corrected to read ‘‘(d)(5)(ii) or
paragraph (d)(5)(iii) of this section, the’’.
Diane O. Williams,
Federal Register Liaison, Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–30171 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD
29 CFR Parts 101, 102, 103
RIN 3142–AAO8
Representation Case Procedures
AGENCY:
National Labor Relations
Board.
Proposed rule; notice of
meeting.
ACTION:
The National Labor Relations
Board (NLRB or Board) invites
interested parties to attend an open
meeting of the Board on November 30,
2011, at 2:30 p.m. The meeting will be
held in the Board Agenda Room (Room
11820), National Labor Relations Board,
1099 14th Street NW., Washington, DC
20570. The purpose of the meeting will
be to vote on how to proceed in this
rulemaking proceeding. No public
testimony or comments will be received.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Wednesday, November 30, 2011,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
beginning at 2:30 p.m. Due to time and
seating considerations, persons desiring
to attend the meeting must notify the
NLRB staff, no later than 4 p.m. on
Monday, November 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held in the Board Agenda Room (Room
11820), National Labor Relations Board,
1099 14th Street NW., Washington, DC
20570. Requests to attend the meeting
must be addressed to Mary Meyers,
Administrative Assistant to the
Chairman, National Labor Relations
Board, 1099 14th Street, NW., Suite
11100, Washington, DC 20570. Requests
may also be made electronically to
publicmeeting@nlrb.gov. All
communications must include the
following words on the Subject Line—
‘‘REQUEST TO ATTEND PUBLIC
MEETING REGARDING RIN 3142–
AA08.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Meyers, Administrative Assistant
to the Chairman, National Labor
Relations Board, 1099 14th Street NW.,
Suite 11100, Washington, DC 20570;
Phone: (202) 273–1700;
Email:publicmeeting@nlrb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Labor Relations Board will
hold an open public meeting on
Wednesday, November 30, 2011, at
2:30 p.m. The purpose of the meeting
will be to vote on how to proceed in this
rulemaking proceeding. No public
testimony or comments will be received.
On June 22, 2011, the NLRB
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (76 FR 36812),
proposing to amend its rules and
regulations governing the filing and
processing of petitions relating to the
representation of employees for
purposes of collective bargaining with
their employer. In addition to the
comment procedure outlined in the
NPRM, the NLRB provided another
opportunity for interested persons to
provide their views to the Board on this
important matter at an open public
meeting. This public meeting was held
on July 18–19, 2011, with 66 witnesses
testifying before the Board. Thereafter,
the deadline for filing initial public
comments was August 22, 2011, and the
deadline for filing reply comments was
September 6, 2011. Over 65,000 written
comments have been received and
analyzed. The Board must now decide
how to proceed in this matter.
Persons desiring to attend the meeting
must notify the NLRB staff, in writing,
at the above listed physical or email
address, by the deadline posted.
Attendees are reminded to bring a photo
identification card with them to the
public meeting in order to gain
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72367-72368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30171]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 602
[REG-146537-06]
RIN 1545-BG08
Income of Foreign Governments and International Organizations;
Correction
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed
regulations that were published in the Federal Register on Thursday,
November 3, 2011. These regulations provide guidance relating to the
taxation of the income of foreign governments
[[Page 72368]]
from investments in the United States. The regulations affect foreign
governments that derive income from sources within the United States.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Juster, (202) 622-3850 (not
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-146537-06) that is the
subject of this correction is under sections 892 and 602 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published on November 3, 2011 (76 FR 68119), the notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG-146537-06) contains errors that may prove to
be misleading and are in need of clarification.
Correction for Publication
Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-146537-06) that
was the subject of FR Doc. 2011-28531 is corrected as follows:
1. On page 68119, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph
heading ``Paperwork Reduction Act'', line 17 from the top of the
column, the language ``the collection of information should be'' is
corrected to read ``the collections of information should be''.
2. On page 68119, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph
heading ``Paperwork Reduction Act'', the first full paragraph in the
column, lines 1 and 2, the language ``Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper'' is corrected to read
``Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the
proper''.
3. On page 68119, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph
heading ``Paperwork Reduction Act'', second paragraph in the column,
line 2, the language ``associate with the proposed collection'' is
corrected to read ``associate with the proposed collections''.
4. On page 68119, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph
heading ``Paperwork Reduction Act'', sixth paragraph in the column,
lines 1 and 2, the language ``The collection of information in this
proposed regulation is in Sec. Sec. 1.892-'' is corrected to read
``The collections of information in this proposed regulations are in
Sec. Sec. 1.892-''.
5. On page 68119, column 2, in the preamble under the paragraph
heading ``Paperwork Reduction Act'', sixth paragraph in the column,
lines 6 and 7, the language ``tax under section 892. The collection of
information is voluntary to obtain a'' is corrected to read ``tax under
section 892. The collections of information are voluntary to obtain
a''.
6. On page 68119, column 3, in the preamble under the paragraph
heading ``Background'', fifth line from the bottom of the paragraph,
the language ``referenced notice of proposed'' is corrected to read
``reference notice of proposed''.
7. On page 68121, column 1, in the preamble under the paragraph
heading ``Definition of Commercial Activity'', third line from the
bottom of the last paragraph, the language ``proposed regulations
revised Sec. 1.892-'' is corrected to read ``proposed regulations
revise Sec. 1.892-''.
8. On page 68122, column 1, Paragraph 1. The authority citation,
line 2, the language ``for parts 1 and 601 continues to read in'' is
corrected to read ``for part 1 continues to read in''.
Sec. 1.892-5 [Corrected]
9. On page 68122, column 3, Sec. 1.892-5(a)(1), line 2, the
paragraph heading (a)(1) the language ``definition of term
``controlled'' is corrected to read ``definition of the term
``controlled''.
10. On page 68123, column 3, Sec. 1.892-5(d)(5)(i), line 3, the
language ``(d)(5)(ii) or (d)(5)(iii) of this section, the'' is
corrected to read ``(d)(5)(ii) or paragraph (d)(5)(iii) of this
section, the''.
Diane O. Williams,
Federal Register Liaison, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal
Processing Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-30171 Filed 11-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P