Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Turbofan Engines, 72348-72350 [2011-30137]
Download as PDF
72348
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
if so equipped. Before beginning the test, the
conventional oven shall be at its normal
nonoperating temperature as defined in
section 1.8 and described in section 2.6. Set
the conventional oven test block W1
approximately in the center of the usable
baking space. If there is a selector switch for
selecting the mode of operation of the oven,
set it for normal baking. If an oven permits
baking by either forced convection by using
a fan, or without forced convection, the oven
is to be tested in each of those two modes.
The oven shall remain on for at least one
complete thermostat ‘‘cut-off/cut-on’’ of the
electrical resistance heaters or gas burners
after the test block temperature has increased
234 °F (130 °C) above its initial temperature.
3.1.1.1 Self-cleaning operation of a
conventional oven. Establish the test
conditions set forth in section 2, ‘‘TEST
CONDITIONS,’’ of this Appendix. Adjust any
pilot lights of a conventional gas oven in
accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and turn off the gas flow to the
conventional cooking top. The temperature of
the conventional oven shall be its normal
nonoperating temperature as defined in
section 1.8 and described in section 2.6.
Then set the conventional oven’s selfcleaning process in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions. If the selfcleaning process is adjustable, use the
average time recommended by the
manufacturer for a moderately soiled oven.
*
*
*
*
*
3.1.2 Conventional cooking top. Establish
the test conditions set forth in section 2,
‘‘TEST CONDITIONS,’’ of this Appendix.
Adjust any pilot lights of a conventional gas
cooking top in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions and turn off the
gas flow to the conventional oven(s), if so
equipped. The temperature of the
conventional cooking top shall be its normal
nonoperating temperature as defined in
section 1.8 and described in section 2.6. Set
the test block in the center of the surface unit
under test. The small test block, W2, shall be
used on electric surface units of 7 inches (178
mm) or less in diameter. The large test block,
W3, shall be used on electric surface units
over 7 inches (177.8 mm) in diameter and on
all gas surface units. Turn on the surface unit
under test and set its energy input rate to the
maximum setting. When the test block
reaches 144 °F (80 °C) above its initial test
block temperature, immediately reduce the
energy input rate to 25 ± 5 percent of the
maximum energy input rate. After 15 ± 0.1
minutes at the reduced energy setting, turn
off the surface unit under test.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
3.1.3 Microwave oven.
3.1.3.1 Microwave oven test standby
mode and off mode power. Establish the
testing conditions set forth in section 2,
‘‘TEST CONDITIONS,’’ of this Appendix. For
microwave ovens that drop from a higher
power state to a lower power state as
discussed in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note
1 of IEC 62301 (Second Edition)
(incorporated by reference; see § 430.3),
allow sufficient time for the microwave oven
to reach the lower power state before
proceeding with the test measurement.
Follow the test procedure as specified in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC 62301
(Second Edition). For units in which power
varies as a function of displayed time in
standby mode, set the clock time to 3:23 and
use the average power approach described in
Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2(a) of IEC 62301
(First Edition), but with a single test period
of 10 minutes +0/¥2 sec after an additional
stabilization period until the clock time
reaches 3:33. If a microwave oven is capable
of operation in either standby mode or off
mode, as defined in sections 1.13 and 1.9,
respectively, or both, test the microwave
oven in each mode in which it can operate.
*
*
*
*
*
3.2.3 Microwave oven test standby mode
and off mode power. Make measurements as
specified in Section 5, Paragraph 5.3 of IEC
62301 (Second Edition) (incorporated by
reference; see § 430.3). If the microwave oven
is capable of operating in standby mode,
measure the average standby mode power of
the microwave oven, PSB, in watts as
specified in section 3.1.3.1. If the microwave
oven is capable of operating in off mode,
measure the average off mode power of the
microwave oven, POFF, as specified in section
3.1.3.1.
*
*
*
*
*
3.3.13 Record the average standby mode
power, PSB, for the microwave oven standby
mode, as determined in section 3.2.3 for a
microwave oven capable of operating in
standby mode. Record the average off mode
power, POFF, for the microwave oven off
mode power test, as determined in section
3.2.3 for a microwave oven capable of
operating in off mode.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–30234 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1176; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NE–35–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Pratt &
Whitney JT9D–7R4D, –7R4D1, –7R4E,
–7R4E1, –7R4G2, –7R4H1, and –7R4E4
turbofan engines. This proposed AD
would establish a new lower life limit
for high-pressure turbine (HPT) 1st stage
air seals, part number (P/N) 735907, and
would require removing them from
service using a drawdown schedule.
This proposed AD was prompted by the
SUMMARY:
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Sheely, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781)
238–7750; fax: (781) 238–7199; email:
stephen.k.sheely@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney Turbofan Engines
PO 00000
determination that a new lower life
limit for the HPT 1st stage air seals,
P/N 735907, is necessary. We are
proposing this AD to prevent critical
life-limited rotating engine part failure
and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Sfmt 4702
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2011–1176; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NE–35–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received two reports of HPT 1st
stage air seals, P/N 735907, found
cracked by fluorescent penetrant
inspection during engine overhaul. The
cracks were located on the flat section
of the seal, between the bolted flange
and the knife edge seals. One of the air
seals had accumulated 11,150 cyclessince-new (CSN), and the other air seal
had accumulated 13,340 CSN. The
current published life limit for these
seals is 15,000 CSN. Pratt & Whitney has
informed us that they are preparing to
issue service information which will
require reducing the published life limit
from 15,000 CSN to 9,000 CSN. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in critical life-limited rotating engine
part failure and damage to the airplane.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This proposed AD would require
establishing a new lower life limit for
HPT 1st stage air seals, P/N 735907,
from 15,000 CSN, to 9,000 CSN, and
would require removing them from
service using a drawdown schedule.
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Costs of Compliance
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 257 Pratt & Whitney JT9D–
7R4D, –7R4D1, –7R4E, –7R4E1, –7R4G2,
–7R4H1, and –7R4E4 turbofan engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 28.8 work-hours per engine to
perform the actions required by this AD,
and that the average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts will cost
about $37,200 per engine. Based on
these figures, we estimate the total cost
of the AD to U.S. operators to be
$10,189,536.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed AD Requirements
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Pratt & Whitney: Docket No. FAA–2011–
1176; Directorate Identifier 2011–NE–
35–AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72349
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 23,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney JT9D–
7R4D, –7R4D1, –7R4E, –7R4E1, –7R4G2,
–7R4H1, and –7R4E4 turbofan engines.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by the
determination that a new lower life limit of
9,000 cycles-since-new (CSN) for highpressure turbine (HPT) 1st stage air seals,
part number (P/N) 735907, is necessary. We
are issuing this AD to prevent critical lifelimited rotating engine part failure, and
damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(f) Removal of HPT 1st Stage Air Seals,
P/N 735907
Remove HPT 1st stage air seals, P/N
735907, from service as follows:
(1) For air seals that have fewer than 6,500
CSN on the effective date of this AD, remove
from service before exceeding 9,000 CSN.
(2) For air seals that have 6,500 CSN or
more on the effective date of this AD, do the
following:
(i) If the engine has a shop visit before the
air seal exceeds 9,000 CSN, remove the air
seal from service before exceeding 9,000
CSN.
(ii) If the engine does not have a shop visit
before the air seal exceeds 9,000 CSN,
remove the air seal from service at the next
shop visit, not to exceed 2,500 cycles from
the effective date of this AD or 15,000 CSN,
whichever occurs first.
(3) Remove from service any HPT 1st stage
air seal, P/N 735907, that is installed or reinstalled after the effective date of this AD,
before the air seal exceeds the new life limit
of 9,000 CSN.
(g) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not
install or reinstall into any engine any HPT
1st stage air seal, P/N 735907, that exceeds
the new life limit of 9,000 CSN.
(h) Engine Shop Visit Definition
For the purposes of this AD, an engine
shop visit is the induction of an engine into
the shop after the effective date of this AD,
where the separation of a major engine flange
occurs, except that the following
maintenance actions, or any combination, are
not considered engine shop visits:
(1) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for removal of the compressor top or
bottom case for airfoil maintenance or
variable stator vane bushing replacement.
(2) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for removal or replacement of the stage
1 fan disk.
(3) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the turbine rear
frame.
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
72350
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(4) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the accessory
gearbox or transfer gearbox, or both.
(5) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the fan forward
case.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make
your request.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Stephen Sheely, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: (781) 238–7750; fax: (781)
238–7199; email: stephen.k.sheely@faa.gov.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
November 15, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–30137 Filed 11–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1253; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–079–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
airplanes that would supersede an
existing AD. This proposed AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main
Landing Gear (MLG) support Rib 5 fitting lug
bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. * * * If not detected, the
cracking may lead to the complete failure of
the fitting and thus could affect the structural
integrity of the MLG installation.
EASA AD 2007–0213 was issued to
address this condition * * *.
After that AD was issued, a case of Rib 5,
ruptured at the 4 o’clock position, was
discovered on an aeroplane on which the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Nov 22, 2011
Jkt 226001
terminating action of EASA AD 2007–0213
had already been embodied * * *.
Investigation of that case revealed that
corrosion damage and cracking that should
have been removed by repair machining was
below the level of detectability of the Non
Destructive Test (NDT) technique that
cleared the surfaces prior to bush
installation.
Comments Invited
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (425) 227–
1221.
Discussion
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.
gov; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Washington 98057–3356; phone: (425)
227–1405; fax: (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1253; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–079–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
On March 31, 2008, we issued AD
2008–08–04, Amendment 39–15456 (73
FR 19975, April 14, 2008). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on Airbus Model
A318, A319, A320, and A321 airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2008–08–04,
Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR 19975,
April 14, 2008), we have been advised
that the existing AD is inadequate to
address the unsafe condition. We have
determined that certain airplanes need
additional detailed inspections for
cracks of the MLG support 5 fitting, and
repair of any cracks found. The
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0011,
dated January 21, 2011 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Several cases of corrosion of the Main
Landing Gear (MLG) support Rib 5 fitting lug
bores have been reported on A320 family
aeroplanes. In some instances, corrosion pits
caused the cracking of the forward lug
(sometimes through its complete thickness).
If not detected, the cracking may lead to the
complete failure of the fitting and thus could
affect the structural integrity of the MLG
installation.
EASA AD 2007–0213 [dated August 7,
2007, which corresponds to FAA AD 2008–
08–04, Amendment 39–15456 (73 FR 19975,
April 14, 2008)] was issued to address this
condition and required a repetitive
inspection program of the MLG support Rib
5 fitting forward lugs and, as terminating
E:\FR\FM\23NOP1.SGM
23NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72348-72350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30137]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1176; Directorate Identifier 2011-NE-35-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4D, -7R4D1, -7R4E, -7R4E1, -7R4G2, -7R4H1, and -
7R4E4 turbofan engines. This proposed AD would establish a new lower
life limit for high-pressure turbine (HPT) 1st stage air seals, part
number (P/N) 735907, and would require removing them from service using
a drawdown schedule. This proposed AD was prompted by the determination
that a new lower life limit for the HPT 1st stage air seals, P/N
735907, is necessary. We are proposing this AD to prevent critical
life-limited rotating engine part failure and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 23,
2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Sheely, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781) 238-7750; fax: (781) 238-7199;
email: stephen.k.sheely@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1176;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NE-35-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
[[Page 72349]]
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received two reports of HPT 1st stage air seals, P/N 735907,
found cracked by fluorescent penetrant inspection during engine
overhaul. The cracks were located on the flat section of the seal,
between the bolted flange and the knife edge seals. One of the air
seals had accumulated 11,150 cycles-since-new (CSN), and the other air
seal had accumulated 13,340 CSN. The current published life limit for
these seals is 15,000 CSN. Pratt & Whitney has informed us that they
are preparing to issue service information which will require reducing
the published life limit from 15,000 CSN to 9,000 CSN. This condition,
if not corrected, could result in critical life-limited rotating engine
part failure and damage to the airplane.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require establishing a new lower life limit
for HPT 1st stage air seals, P/N 735907, from 15,000 CSN, to 9,000 CSN,
and would require removing them from service using a drawdown schedule.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 257 Pratt & Whitney
JT9D-7R4D, -7R4D1, -7R4E, -7R4E1, -7R4G2, -7R4H1, and -7R4E4 turbofan
engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 28.8 work-hours per engine to perform the actions
required by this AD, and that the average labor rate is $85 per work-
hour. Required parts will cost about $37,200 per engine. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to be
$10,189,536.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Pratt & Whitney: Docket No. FAA-2011-1176; Directorate Identifier
2011-NE-35-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 23, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4D, -7R4D1, -7R4E, -
7R4E1, -7R4G2, -7R4H1, and -7R4E4 turbofan engines.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by the determination that a new lower life
limit of 9,000 cycles-since-new (CSN) for high-pressure turbine
(HPT) 1st stage air seals, part number (P/N) 735907, is necessary.
We are issuing this AD to prevent critical life-limited rotating
engine part failure, and damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(f) Removal of HPT 1st Stage Air Seals, P/N 735907
Remove HPT 1st stage air seals, P/N 735907, from service as
follows:
(1) For air seals that have fewer than 6,500 CSN on the
effective date of this AD, remove from service before exceeding
9,000 CSN.
(2) For air seals that have 6,500 CSN or more on the effective
date of this AD, do the following:
(i) If the engine has a shop visit before the air seal exceeds
9,000 CSN, remove the air seal from service before exceeding 9,000
CSN.
(ii) If the engine does not have a shop visit before the air
seal exceeds 9,000 CSN, remove the air seal from service at the next
shop visit, not to exceed 2,500 cycles from the effective date of
this AD or 15,000 CSN, whichever occurs first.
(3) Remove from service any HPT 1st stage air seal, P/N 735907,
that is installed or re-installed after the effective date of this
AD, before the air seal exceeds the new life limit of 9,000 CSN.
(g) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not install or reinstall
into any engine any HPT 1st stage air seal, P/N 735907, that exceeds
the new life limit of 9,000 CSN.
(h) Engine Shop Visit Definition
For the purposes of this AD, an engine shop visit is the
induction of an engine into the shop after the effective date of
this AD, where the separation of a major engine flange occurs,
except that the following maintenance actions, or any combination,
are not considered engine shop visits:
(1) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for removal of
the compressor top or bottom case for airfoil maintenance or
variable stator vane bushing replacement.
(2) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for removal or
replacement of the stage 1 fan disk.
(3) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for replacement
of the turbine rear frame.
[[Page 72350]]
(4) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for replacement
of the accessory gearbox or transfer gearbox, or both.
(5) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for replacement
of the fan forward case.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for
this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Stephen Sheely,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781) 238-7750;
fax: (781) 238-7199; email: stephen.k.sheely@faa.gov.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 15, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-30137 Filed 11-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P