Gross Estate; Election to Value on Alternate Valuation Date, 71491-71498 [2011-29921]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 20
[REG–112196–07]
RIN 1545–BH64
Gross Estate; Election to Value on
Alternate Valuation Date
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations that provide
guidance respecting the election to use
the alternate valuation method under
section 2032 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). The proposed regulations
will affect estates that file Form 706,
United States Estate (and GenerationSkipping Transfer) Tax Return and elect
to use the alternate valuation method.
This document also provides notice of
a public hearing on these proposed
regulations.
SUMMARY:
Written or electronic comments
must be received by February 16, 2012.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for March 9,
2012, at 10 a.m. must be received by
February 17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–112196–07),
Internal Revenue Service, Room 5203,
PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–112196–
07), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20224; or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS–REG–
112196–07). The public hearing will be
held in the Auditorium, beginning at 10
a.m., at the Internal Revenue Building,
1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Theresa M. Melchiorre, (202) 622–3090;
concerning submissions of comments,
the hearing, and/or to be placed on the
building access list to attend the
hearing, Richard Hurst at
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov or
at (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
Background
Section 2001 imposes a tax on the
transfer of the taxable estate of every
decedent who is a citizen or resident of
the United States. Section 2033 provides
that the value of the gross estate
includes the value of all property to the
extent of the interest of the decedent at
the time of his death. Section 2031(a)
provides that the value of the decedent’s
gross estate includes the value at the
time of the decedent’s death of all
property, real or personal, tangible or
intangible, wherever situated. Section
2032(a) provides that the value of the
gross estate may be determined, if the
executor so elects, by valuing all the
property includible in the gross estate as
follows. Property distributed, sold,
exchanged, or otherwise disposed of
during the 6-month period immediately
after the date of death (alternate
valuation period) is valued as of the
date of distribution, sale, exchange, or
other disposition (transaction date).
I.R.C. section 2032(a)(1). Property not
distributed, sold, exchanged, or
otherwise disposed of during the
alternate valuation period is valued as
of the date that is 6 months after the
decedent’s death (6-month date). I.R.C.
section 2032(a)(2). Any interest or estate
that is affected by the mere lapse of time
is includible at its value as of the date
of death (instead of any later date), with
adjustment for any difference in its
value as of the later date that is not due
to the mere lapse of time. I.R.C. section
2032(a)(3).
Section 2031(c) was enacted by the
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, 105 Public
Law 34 section 508(a), 111 Stat. 788
(August 5, 1997). Pursuant to this
section, a decedent’s estate may elect to
exclude from the gross estate a portion
of the fair market value of property
includible in the decedent’s gross estate
by granting a qualified conservation
easement on that property after the date
of the decedent’s death but on or before
the due date (including extensions) for
filing the Form 706, United States Estate
(and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax
Return.
On April 25, 2008, a notice of
proposed rulemaking (Reg–112196–07)
relating to amendments to the Estate
Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 20) under
section 2032 of the Code was published
in the Federal Register (73 FR 22300).
Those regulations (73 FR 22300)
proposed to clarify that the election to
use the alternate valuation method
under section 2032 is available to
estates that experience a reduction in
the value of the gross estate during the
alternate valuation period, but only to
the extent that the reduction in value is
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71491
due to market conditions and not to
other post-death events (events
occurring during the alternate valuation
period). The term ’’market conditions’’
was defined as events outside of the
control of the decedent (or the
decedent’s executor or trustee) or other
person whose property is being valued
that affect the fair market value of the
property includible in the decedent’s
gross estate. Changes in value due to
mere lapse of time or to other post-death
events would be ignored in determining
the value of the decedent’s gross estate
under the alternate valuation method.
No hearing was held because no
person or organization requested to
speak at a hearing. However, written
comments were received. Some
commentators expressed concern that
the proposed regulations (73 FR 22300)
would create administrative problems
because an estate would be required to
trace property and to obtain appraisals
based on hypothetical property. Some
commentators stated that the current
and the proposed regulations (73 FR
22300) did not adequately address the
application of section 2032 to certain
types of property, such as property the
title to which passes at death due to
contract, and to transactions carried out
during the alternate valuation period
between an estate and partnerships,
corporations, or other entities. For
example, § 20.2032–1(c)(1) does not
address the consequences of the estate
contributing property to a partnership
during the alternate valuation period.
In addition, commentators requested
guidance on the effect of a section 2032
election in calculating the portion of a
trust includible in the decedent’s gross
estate under section 2036. This would
arise in the situation where the
decedent had retained the right to an
annuity, unitrust, or other payment from
the trust for life, for any period not
ascertainable without reference to the
grantor’s death, or for a period that does
not in fact end before the grantor’s
death. Further, some commentators
requested guidance on the treatment of
the grant, during the alternate valuation
period, of a qualified conservation
easement under section 2031(c).
Many commentators acknowledged
that estates may enter into a transaction
during the alternate valuation period
that could result in the abuse of the
section 2032 election. They suggested
that the IRS and Treasury Department
would better serve taxpayers and
address any potential abuse by ensuring
that the regulations address the issues
described in this preamble rather than
finalizing the approach taken in the
proposed regulations.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
71492
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
In view of the comments, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are
withdrawing the proposed regulations
(73 FR 22300) by the publication of
these proposed regulations in the
Federal Register. Nevertheless, see the
background section of those proposed
regulations (73 FR 22300) for a summary
of the legislative history of section 2032
and the purpose for issuing these
proposed regulations.
This document contains revised
proposed amendments to the
regulations promulgated under section
2032. These proposed regulations make
irrelevant, for purposes of determining
the value of property as of the
transaction date or the 6-month date,
whichever is applicable (alternate
valuation date), the percentage of
ownership or control in an entity
includible in the gross estate and the
extent of participation by the estate (or
other holder of property includible in
the gross estate) in the relevant postdeath events.
Certain provisions in the current
regulations that have been in effect
since 1954 are restated in the proposed
regulations for purposes of clarity. The
effective date of those provisions is not
changed.
Explanation of Provisions
These regulations propose to amend
several sections of § 20.2032–1.
Generally, paragraph (c)(1)(i) identifies
transactions that constitute
distributions, sales, exchanges, or
dispositions of property. If an estate’s
(or other holder’s) property is subject to
such a transaction during the alternate
valuation period, the estate must value
that property on the transaction date.
The value included in the gross estate
is the fair market value of that property
on the date of and immediately prior to
the transaction. The term ‘‘property’’
refers to the property includible in the
decedent’s gross estate under section
2033.
Sections 20.2032–1(c)(1)(ii) and
(c)(1)(iii)(A) identify two exceptions to
the rule in § 20.2032–1(c)(1)(i). If either
exception applies, the estate may use
the 6-month date and value the property
held on that date. The exception in
§ 20.2032–1(c)(1)(ii) applies only to
transactions in which an interest in a
corporation, partnership, or other entity
(entity) includible in the decedent’s
gross estate is exchanged for one or
more different interests (for example, a
different class of stock) in the same
entity or in an acquiring or resulting
entity or entities during the alternate
valuation period. Such transactions may
include, without limitation,
reorganizations, recapitalizations,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
mergers, or similar transactions. This
exception substitutes a fair market value
test for the corporate provisions in the
current regulations. Specifically, this
paragraph proposes that, if, during the
alternate valuation period, the interest
in an entity includible in the gross
estate is exchanged for a different
interest in the same entity, or in an
acquiring or resulting entity or entities,
and if the fair market value of the
interest on the date of the exchange
equals the fair market value of the
property for which it was exchanged,
then the transaction will not be treated
as an exchange for purposes of section
2032(a)(1). As a result, the estate may
use the 6-month date to value the
interest in the same entity or in the
acquiring or resulting entity or entities
received in the exchange. For this
purpose, the fair market values of the
surrendered property and received
interest are deemed to be equal if the
difference between the fair market
values of the surrendered property and
the received interest does not exceed 5
percent of the fair market value of the
surrendered property as of the
transaction date. This section has no
effect on any other provision of the
Code that is applicable to the
transaction. For example, the provisions
of chapter 14 may apply even if the
transaction does not result in a deemed
exchange for section 2032 purposes as a
result of satisfying the provisions of
§ 20.2032–1(c)(1)(ii).
Section 20.2032–1(c)(1)(iii)(A)
proposes that, if, during the alternate
valuation period, an estate (or other
holder) receives a distribution from a
business entity, bank account, or
retirement trust (entity) and an interest
in that entity is includible in the
decedent’s gross estate, the estate may
use the 6-month date to value the
property held in the estate if the
following requirement is satisfied. The
fair market value of the interest in the
entity includible in the gross estate
immediately before the distribution
must equal the sum of the fair market
value of the distributed property on the
date of the distribution and the fair
market value of the interest in the entity
includible in the gross estate
immediately after the distribution. If
this requirement is not satisfied, the
estate must use the fair market value as
of the distribution date and immediately
prior to the distribution of the entire
interest in the entity includible in the
gross estate. For purposes of this
section, any distribution is deemed to
consist first of excluded property (as
defined in § 20.2032–1(d)), if any, and
then of included property.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 20.2032–1(c)(1)(iv) proposes
an aggregation rule to use in calculating
the fair market value of each portion of
property that is, or is deemed to be
distributed, sold, exchanged, or
otherwise disposed of during the
alternate valuation period, and that
remains in the gross estate on the 6month date.
Section 20.2032–1(c)(iii)(B) provides a
special rule to use in determining the
portion of a trust includible, by reason
of a retained interest, in the decedent’s
gross estate under section 2036 as of the
alternate valuation date. An example is
added to § 20.2032–1(e) to illustrate this
special rule and the effect of the
provisions of § 20.2032–1(d) and
§ 20.2032–1(f)(2)(i) on this calculation.
Section 20.2032–1(c)(2) is amended to
clarify when property, the title to which
passes by contract or by operation of
law, is deemed to be distributed, sold,
exchanged, or otherwise disposed of for
section 2032 purposes. Section 20.2032–
1(c)(3) is amended to clarify the person
or entity that will be treated as having
sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed
of the property for section 2032
purposes.
Section 20.2032–1(c)(4) is added to
provide that if Congress, by statute, has
deemed that a post-death event has
occurred on the decedent’s date of
death, the post-death event will not
result in a distribution, sale, exchange,
or other disposition of the property for
section 2032 purposes. To date, the only
post-death event that satisfies this
exception is the grant, during the
alternate valuation period, of a
conservation easement in accordance
with section 2031(c). With respect to
such a grant, for section 2032 purposes,
the estate must determine the fair
market value of the property as of the
date of death and as of the alternate
valuation date, taking into account the
effect of the easement on each of those
valuation dates.
Section 20.2032–1(c)(5) provides
examples, not intended to be exclusive,
illustrating the provisions of § 20.2032–
1(c).
Section 20.2032–1(f) is revised to
clarify the types of factors that impact
the fair market value of property and the
effect of which will be recognized under
section 2032. This paragraph also
explains and illustrates these rules.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
Section 20.2032–1(c)(2) except the
second sentence of the introductory
text, § 20.2032–1(c)(3) except § 20.2032–
1(c)(3)(i)(C), the chart in Example 1 of
§ 20.2032–1(e), § 20.2032–1(f)(2) except
the last sentence, and the first and third
sentences in § 20.2032–1(f)(2)(ii) are
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
71493
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
applicable to decedents dying after
August 16, 1954. Sections 20.2032–1(a)
introductory text, 20.2032–1(a)(1),
20.2032–1(a)(2), 20.2032–1(c)(1)(i),
(c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv), (c)(3)(i)(C),
(c)(4), (c)(5), (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), and (f)(3), the
second sentence in § 20.2032–1(c)(2)
introductory text, § 20.2032–1(e) except
the chart in Example 1, the last sentence
in § 20.2032–1(f)(2) introductory text,
and the second sentence in § 20.2032–
1(f)(2)(ii) are applicable to estates of
decedents dying on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final in the
Federal Register.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
proposed regulation is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these
regulations and, because these
regulations do not impose on small
entities a collection of information
requirement, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, this regulation has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS
and Treasury Department also request
comments on the clarity of the proposed
rules and how they can be made easier
to understand. All comments will be
available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for March 9, 2012 at 10 a.m. in
Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building.
Due to building security procedures,
visitors must use the main building
entrance 1111 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC. In addition, all
visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
more information about having your
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
name placed on the list to attend the
hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit written (a signed original
and eight (8) copies) or electronic
comments by February 16, 2012 and an
outline of the topics to be discussed and
the time to be devoted to each topic by
February 17, 2012. A period of 10
minutes will be allotted to each person
for making comments. An agenda
showing the scheduling of the speakers
will be prepared after the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed. Copies of
the agenda will be available free of
charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is Theresa M.
Melchiorre, Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 20
Estate taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805,
the notice of proposed rulemaking (Reg–
112196–07) that was published in the
Federal Register on April 25, 2008 (73
FR 22300) is withdrawn.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 20 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 20—ESTATE TAX; ESTATES OF
DECEDENTS DYING AFTER AUGUST
16, 1954
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 20 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
§ 20.2032–1
[Amended]
Par. 2. For each entry in the table,
each paragraph in the ‘‘Old Paragraph’’
column is redesignated as indicated in
the ‘‘New Paragraph’’ column:
Old paragraph
New paragraph
20.2032–1(c)(1)
20.2032–1(c)(3)
20.2032–1(c)(3)(i)
20.2032–1(c)(1)(i)
20.2032–1(c)(3)(i)
20.2032–
1(c)(3)(i)(A)
20.2032–
1(c)(3)(i)(B)
20.2032–
1(c)(3)(i)(C)
20.2032–1(c)(3)(ii)
20.2032–1(c)(3)(iii)
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Old paragraph
20.2032–1(c)(3)(iv)
20.2032–1(c)(3)(v)
20.2032–1(f)
20.2032–1(f)(1)
20.2032–1(f)(2)
New paragraph
20.2032–
1(c)(3)(i)(D)
20.2032–
1(c)(3)(i)(E)
20.2032–1(f)(2)
20.2032–1(f)(2)(i)
20.2032–1(f)(2)(ii)
Par. 3. Section 20.2032–1 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (a) introductory
text.
2. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and
(a)(2).
3. Revising newly-designated
paragraph (c)(1)(i), newly-designated
paragraph (c)(3)(i)(C), paragraph (e)
introductory text, the introductory text
of paragraph (e) Example 1 preceding
the table, the last sentence in newlydesignated paragraph (f)(2) introductory
text, newly-designated paragraph
(f)(2)(i), and the second sentence in
newly-designated paragraph (f)(2)(ii).
4. Adding new paragraphs (c)(1)(ii),
(c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv), (c)(4), (c)(5), (f)(1),
and (f)(3).
5. Adding a paragraph heading and a
new second sentence in paragraph (c)(2)
introductory text.
6. Adding a paragraph heading to
paragraph (c)(3).
7. Designating the undesignated
language following newly-designated
paragraph (c)(3)(i)(E) as paragraph
(c)(3)(ii) and adding a paragraph
heading to this paragraph.
8. Designating the table in paragraph
(e) as Example 1 and adding paragraph
(e) Example 2 following the table.
9. Revising the paragraph heading and
adding two sentences at the end of
paragraph (h).
The additions and revisions read as
follows.
§ 20.2032–1
Alternate valuation.
(a) In general.—In general, section
2032 provides for the valuation of a
decedent’s gross estate at a date
(alternate valuation date) other than the
date of the decedent’s death. More
specifically, if an executor elects the
alternate valuation method under
section 2032, the property includible in
the decedent’s gross estate on the date
of death (decedent’s interest) is valued
as of whichever of the following dates
is applicable:
(1) Any property distributed, sold,
exchanged, or otherwise disposed of
within 6 months (1 year, if the decedent
died on or before December 31, 1970)
after the decedent’s death (alternate
valuation period) is valued as of the
date on which it is first distributed,
sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed
of (transaction date).
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
71494
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(2) Any property not distributed, sold,
exchanged, or otherwise disposed of
during the alternate valuation period is
valued as of the date 6 months (1 year,
if the decedent died on or before
December 31, 1970) after the date of the
decedent’s death (6-month date).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Meaning of ‘‘distributed, sold,
exchanged, or otherwise disposed of’’—
(1) In general—
(i) Transactions included. The phrase
‘‘distributed, sold, exchanged, or
otherwise disposed of’’ comprehends all
possible ways by which property ceases
to form a part of the gross estate. This
phrase includes, but is not limited to:
(A) The use of money on hand at the
date of the decedent’s death to pay
funeral or other expenses of the
decedent’s estate;
(B) The use of money on hand at the
date of the decedent’s death to invest in
other property;
(C) The exercise of employee stock
options;
(D) The surrender of stock for
corporate assets in partial or complete
liquidation of a corporation, and similar
transactions involving partnerships or
other entities;
(E) The distribution by the estate (or
other holder) of included property as
defined in paragraph (d) of this section;
(F) The transfer or exchange of
property for other property, whether or
not gain or loss is currently recognized
for income tax purposes;
(G) The contribution of cash or other
property to a corporation, partnership,
or other entity, whether or not gain or
loss is currently recognized for income
tax purposes;
(H) The exchange of interests in a
corporation, partnership, or other entity
(entity) for one or more different
interests (for example, a different class
of stock) in the same entity or in an
acquiring or resulting entity or entities
(see, however, paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this
section); and
(I) Any other change in the ownership
structure or interests in, or in the assets
of, a corporation, partnership, or other
entity, an interest in which is includible
in the gross estate, such that the
included property after the change does
not reasonably represent the included
property at the decedent’s date of death
(see, however, paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of
this section). Such a change in the
ownership structure or interests in or in
the assets of an entity includes, without
limitation—
(1) The dilution of the decedent’s
ownership interest in the entity due to
the issuance of additional ownership
interests in that entity;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
(2) An increase in the decedent’s
ownership interest in the entity due to
the entity’s redemption of the interest of
a different owner;
(3) A reinvestment of the entity’s
assets; and
(4) A distribution or disbursement of
property (other than excluded property
as defined in paragraph (d) of this
section) by the entity (other than
expenses, such as rents and salaries,
paid in the ordinary course of the
entity’s business), with the effect that
the fair market value of the entity before
the occurrence does not equal the fair
market value of the entity immediately
thereafter.
(ii) Exchange of an interest in an
existing corporation, partnership, or
other entity includible in the gross
estate. If an interest in a corporation,
partnership, or other entity (entity) is
includible in the gross estate at death
and that interest is exchanged as
described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(H) of
this section for one or more different
interests in the same entity or in an
acquiring or resulting entity or entities,
the transaction does not result in an
exchange or disposition under section
2032(a)(1) and paragraph (c)(1)(i)(H) of
this section if, on the date of the
exchange, the fair market value of the
interest in the entity equals the fair
market value of the interest(s) in the
same entity or the acquiring or resulting
entity or entities. Such transactions may
include, without limitation,
reorganizations, recapitalizations,
mergers, or similar transactions. In
determining whether the exchanged
properties have the same fair market
value, a difference in value equal to or
less than 5 percent of the fair market
value, as of the transaction date, of the
property interest includible in the gross
estate on the decedent’s date of death is
ignored. If the transaction satisfies the
requirements of this paragraph, the
property to be valued on the 6-month
date (or on the transaction date, if any,
subsequent to this transaction) is the
property received in the exchange,
rather than the property includible in
the decedent’s gross estate at the date of
death. This paragraph has no effect on
any other provision of the Internal
Revenue Code that is applicable to the
transaction. For example, even if the
transaction does not result in a deemed
exchange as a result of satisfying the
requirements of this paragraph, the
provisions of chapter 14 may be
applicable to determine fair market
value for Federal estate tax purposes.
(iii) Distributions from an account or
entity in which the decedent held an
interest at death.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(A) In general. If during the alternate
valuation period, an estate (or other
holder of the decedent’s interest)
receives a distribution or disbursement
(to the extent the distribution or
disbursement consists of included
property, as defined in paragraph (d) of
this section) (payment) from a
partnership, corporation, trust
(including an IRA, Roth IRA, 403(b),
401(k), Thrift Savings Plan, etc.), bank
account or similar asset, or other entity
(entity), and an interest in that entity is
includible in the gross estate, the
payment does not result in a
distribution under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)
of this section. However, this rule
applies only if, on the date of the
payment, the fair market value of the
decedent’s interest in the entity before
the payment equals the sum of the fair
market value of the payment made to
the estate (or other holder of the
decedent’s interest in the entity) and the
fair market value of the decedent’s
interest in the entity, not including any
excluded property, after the payment. In
this case, the alternate valuation date of
the payment is the date of the payment,
and the alternate valuation date of the
decedent’s remaining interest in the
entity, if any, is the 6-month date (or the
transaction date, if any, subsequent to
this payment). If this requirement is not
met, the payment is a distribution under
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section, and
the alternate valuation date of the
decedent’s entire interest in the entity is
the date of the payment. For purposes
of this section, a distribution or
disbursement is deemed to consist first
of excluded property, if any, and then
of included property, as those terms are
defined in paragraph (d) of this section.
(B) Special rule. If the decedent’s
interest in an entity that is includible in
the gross estate consists of the amount
needed to produce an annuity, unitrust,
remainder, or other such payment
valued under section 2036, then
assuming the distribution satisfies the
general rule set forth in paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, the value of
each distribution (to the extent it is
deemed to consist of included property)
payable (whether or not actually paid)
during the alternate valuation period
shall be added to the value of the entity
on the alternate valuation date. The sum
of the fair market value of these
distributions when made and the fair
market value of the entity on the
alternate valuation date shall be used as
the fair market value of the entity in
computing the amount, valued as of the
alternate valuation date, to be included
in the decedent’s gross estate under
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
section 2036. See Example 2 of
paragraph (e) of this section.
(iv) Aggregation. For purposes of this
section, a special aggregation rule
applies in two situations to determine
the value to be included in the gross
estate pursuant to an alternate valuation
election. Those two situations arise
when, during the alternate valuation
period, less than all of the interest
includible in the decedent’s gross estate
in a particular property is the subject of
a transaction described in paragraphs
(c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii), or (c)(2) of
this section. In one situation, one or
more portions of the includible interest
are subject to such a transaction and a
portion is still held on the 6-month date.
In the other situation, the entire interest
includible in the gross estate is disposed
of in two or more such transactions
during the alternate valuation period, so
that no part of that interest remains on
the 6-month date. In both of these
situations, the fair market value of each
portion of the interest includible in the
gross estate is to be determined as
follows. The fair market value of each
portion subject to such a transaction,
and the portion remaining, if any, on the
6-month date, is the fair market value,
as of the transaction date, or the 6month date for any remaining portion,
of the entire interest includible in the
gross estate on the decedent’s date of
death, multiplied by a fraction. The
numerator of that fraction is the portion
of the interest subject to that
transaction, or the portion remaining on
the 6-month date, and the denominator
is the entire interest includible in the
gross estate at the decedent’s date of
death.
(2) Property distributed. * * *
Property is not considered ‘‘distributed’’
merely because property passes directly
at death as a result of a beneficiary
designation or other contractual
arrangement or by operation of law.
* * *
(3) Person able to sell, exchange, or
otherwise dispose of property includible
in the gross estate. (i) * * *
(A) * * *
(B) * * *
(C) An heir, devisee, or other person
to whom title to property passes directly
on death by reason of a beneficiary
designation or other contractual
arrangement or by operation of law;
(D) * * *
(E) * * *
(ii) Binding contracts. * * *
(4) Certain post-death events. If the
effect of any other provision of the
Internal Revenue Code is that a postdeath event is deemed to have occurred
on the date of death, the post-death
event will not be considered a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
transaction described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i) of this section. For example, the
grant, during the alternate valuation
period, of a qualified conservation
easement in accordance with section
2031(c) is not a transaction described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
Pursuant to section 2031(c), the postdeath grant of the easement is effective
for Federal estate tax purposes as of the
date of the decedent’s death. As a result,
for purposes of determining both the
estate’s eligibility to make an election
under this section and the value of the
property on the alternate valuation date,
the fair market value of the property as
of the date of death must be compared
to the fair market value of that property
as of the alternate valuation date, in
each case as that value is adjusted by
reason of the existence of the section
2031(c) qualified easement.
(5) Examples. The application of
paragraph (c) of this section is
illustrated in the following examples. In
each example, decedent’s (D’s) estate
elects to value D’s gross estate under the
alternate valuation method, so that the
alternate valuation date of the property
includible in the gross estate on D’s date
of death is either the transaction date or
the 6-month date. In each example,
assume that the only factors affecting
value during the alternate valuation
period, and the only occurrences
described in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and
(c)(2) of this section, are those described
in the example.
Example 1. At D’s death, D owned property
with a fair market value of $100X. Two
months after D’s death (Date 1), D’s executor
and D’s family members formed a limited
partnership. D’s executor contributed all of
the property to the partnership and received
an interest in the partnership in exchange.
The investment of the property in the
partnership is a transaction described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(F) and/or (G) of this
section. As a result, the alternate valuation
date of the property is the date of its
contribution and the value to be included in
D’s gross estate is the fair market value of the
property immediately prior to its
contribution to the partnership. The result
would be the same if D’s estate instead had
contributed property to a limited partnership
formed prior to D’s death by D and/or other
parties, related or unrelated to D. Further, the
result would be the same if D’s estate had
contributed the property to a corporation,
publicly traded or otherwise, or other entity
after D’s death and prior to the 6-month date.
Example 2. At D’s death, D held incentive
stock options that were qualified under
section 422. D’s executor exercised all of the
stock options prior to the 6-month date. The
exercise of the stock options is a transaction
described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) of this
section. Thus, the alternate valuation date of
the stock options is the date of their exercise
and the value to be included in D’s gross
estate is the fair market value of the stock
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71495
options immediately prior to their exercise.
The result would be the same if the stock
options were not qualified under section 422
and were taxable under section 83 upon
exercise.
Example 3. D’s gross estate includes a
controlling interest in Y, a corporation.
During the alternate valuation period, Y
issued additional shares of stock and
awarded them to certain key employees. D’s
interest in Y was diluted to a non-controlling
interest by Y’s issuance of the additional
stock. Y’s issuance of the stock is a
transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)
of this section. The value to be included in
D’s gross estate is the fair market value of D’s
stock immediately prior to Y’s issuance of the
additional stock. The result would be the
same if D’s estate included a minority
interest in Y on the date of death and that
interest became a controlling interest during
the alternate valuation period as the result of
Y’s redemption of the shares of another
shareholder.
Example 4. At D’s death, D owned stock in
Y, a corporation. During the alternate
valuation period, the Board of Directors of Y
contributed all of Y’s assets to a partnership
in exchange for interests therein. The
contribution is a transaction described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(3) of this section.
Therefore, the alternate valuation date of D’s
stock in Y is the date of the reinvestment of
Y’s assets and the value to be included in D’s
gross estate is the fair market value of D’s
stock in Y immediately prior to the
reinvestment. The result would be the same
even if the Board of Directors had
contributed only a portion of Y’s assets to the
partnership during the alternate valuation
period.
Example 5. (i) At D’s death, D owned
common stock in Y, a corporation. Two
months after D’s death (Date 1), there was a
reorganization of Y. In the reorganization, D’s
estate exchanged all of its stock for a new
class of stock in X. On the date of the
reorganization, the difference between the
fair market value of the stock D’s estate
received and the fair market value on that
date of the stock includible in D’s gross estate
at death was greater than 5% of the fair
market value, as of the date of the
reorganization, of the stock D held at death.
The reorganization is a transaction described
in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(H) of this section and
does not satisfy the exception described in
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section. Thus, the
alternate valuation date is the date of the
reorganization and the value to be included
in D’s gross estate is the fair market value of
the stock immediately prior to the
reorganization. This result is not affected by
whether or not the reorganization is a tax-free
reorganization for Federal income tax
purposes. The result would be the same if the
stock had been held, for example, in an IRA
with designated beneficiaries. See paragraph
(c)(3)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) If, instead, the difference between the
two fair market values as of the date of the
reorganization was equal to or less than 5%
of the fair market value, as of the date of the
reorganization, of the stock D held at death,
the reorganization would satisfy the
exception provided in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
71496
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
this section. Thus, the alternate valuation
date would be the 6-month date. The value
to be included in D’s gross estate would be
the fair market value, determined as of the 6month date, of the new class of stock in Y
that D’s estate received in the reorganization.
Example 6. (i) At D’s death, D owned an
interest in Partnership X that is includible in
D’s gross estate. During the alternate
valuation period, X made a cash distribution
to each of the partners. The distribution
consists entirely of included property as
defined in paragraph (d) of this section. The
distribution is a transaction described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this section. On the
date of the distribution, the fair market value
of D’s interest in X before the distribution
equaled the sum of the distribution paid to
D’s estate and the fair market value of D’s
interest in X immediately after the
distribution. Thus, pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, the alternate
valuation date of the property distributed is
the date of the distribution, and the alternate
valuation date of D’s interest in X is the 6month date.
(ii) If, instead, the fair market value of D’s
interest in X before the distribution did not
equal the sum of the distribution paid to D’s
estate and the fair market value of D’s interest
in X (not including any excluded property)
immediately after the distribution, then
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this
section, the alternate valuation date of D’s
entire interest in X would be the date of the
distribution.
Example 7. D died owning 100% of
Blackacre. D’s will directs that an undivided
70% interest in Blackacre is to pass to Trust
A for the benefit of D’s surviving spouse, and
an undivided 30% interest is to pass to Trust
B for the benefit of D’s surviving child. Three
months after D’s death (Date 1), the executor
of D’s estate distributed a 70% interest in
Blackacre to Trust A. Four months after D’s
death (Date 2), the executor of D’s estate
distributed a 30% interest in Blackacre to
Trust B. The following values are includible
in D’s gross estate pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(1)(i)(E) and (c)(1)(iv): The fair market
value of the 70% interest in Blackacre,
determined by calculating 70% of the fair
market value of all (100%) of Blackacre as of
Date 1; and the fair market value of the 30%
interest in Blackacre, determined by
calculating 30% of the fair market value of
all (100%) of Blackacre as of Date 2.
Example 8. At D’s death, D owned 100%
of the units of a limited liability company
(LLC). Two months after D’s death (Date 1),
D’s executor sold 20% of the LLC units to an
unrelated third party. Three months after D’s
death (Date 2), D’s executor sold 40% of the
LLC units to D’s child. On the 6-month date,
the estate held the remaining 40% of the
units in the LLC. The alternate valuation date
of the units sold is their sale date (Date 1 and
Date 2, respectively) pursuant to paragraph
(a) of this section. The alternate valuation
date of the units remaining in the estate is the
6-month date, as these units have not been
distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise
disposed of in a transaction described in
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) or (c)(2) of this section
prior to this date. Pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(iv) of this section, the value of the units
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
disposed of on Date 1 and Date 2 is the fair
market value of the 20% and 40% interests,
determined by calculating 20% and 40% of
the fair market value as of Date 1 and Date
2, respectively, of all the units (100%)
includible in the gross estate at D’s death.
Similarly, the value of the units held on the
6-month date to be included in D’s gross
estate is the fair market value of those units,
determined by taking 40% of the fair market
value on the 6-month date of all of the units
(100%) includible in the gross estate at D’s
death. As a result, the fact that the partial
sales resulted in the creation of three
minority interests is not taken into account
in valuing under section 2032 any portion of
the LLC interests held by D at D’s death.
Example 9. Husband died owning an
interest in a brokerage account titled in the
names of Husband and Wife with rights of
survivorship. On Husband’s death, the
account held marketable securities, corporate
bonds, municipal bonds, certificates of
deposit, and cash. During the alternate
valuation period, Wife’s stockbroker advised
her that the account could not be held under
the social security number of a deceased
individual. Accordingly, approximately one
month after Husband’s death, Wife directed
the stockbroker to transfer the account into
an account titled in Wife’s sole name.
Because title to the joint account passes to
Wife at the moment of Husband’s death by
operation of law, the transfer of the joint
account into an account in Wife’s sole name
is not a transaction described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i) of this section. Accordingly, the
value of the assets held in Wife’s solely
owned account will be includible in
Husband’s gross estate at their fair market
value on the 6-month date. The result would
be the same if the brokerage firm
automatically transferred title to the account
into Wife’s name, or if Wife changed the
beneficiary designation for the account.
Finally, the result would be the same if,
instead of an account with a brokerage firm,
the assets were held in Husband’s retirement
account (IRA or similar trust such as a Roth
IRA, 403(b) plan, or 401(k) plan) or Wife’s
ownership of the account was the result of
a contract (a beneficiary designation form)
rather than operation of law.
Example 10. Assume the same facts as in
Example 9 except that, during the alternate
valuation period, Wife directed the
stockbroker to sell a bond in the account. The
sale is a transaction described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this section. Wife is an
individual described in paragraph (c)(3)(i)(D)
of this section. Thus, the alternate valuation
date of the bond is the date of its sale. The
values to be included in D’s gross estate are
the fair market value of the bond on date of
its sale, and the fair market value of the
balance of the account on the 6-month date.
The result would be the same if the bond had
matured and was retired during the alternate
valuation period. The result also would be
the same if the bond was held within a
retirement account (IRA or similar trust such
as a Roth IRA, 403(b) plan, or 401(k) plan).
Example 11. Assume the same facts as in
Example 9 except that, during the alternate
valuation period, Wife withdrew cash from
the account or otherwise received income or
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
other disbursements from the account. Each
such withdrawal or disbursement from the
account (to the extent it consists of included
property as defined in paragraph (d) of this
section) is a distribution described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this section.
Provided that, on the date of each
distribution, the fair market value of the
account before the distribution (not including
excluded property) equals the sum of the
included property distributed and the fair
market value of the included property in the
account immediately after the distribution in
accordance with paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of
this section, the alternate valuation date for
each distribution is the date of the
distribution and the alternate valuation date
for the account is the 6-month date. The
value to be included in the gross estate is the
fair market value of each distribution of
included property (determined as of the date
of distribution) and the fair market value of
the account on the 6-month date. The result
would be the same if the assets were held in
an IRA or similar trust, such as a Roth IRA,
403(b) plan, or 401(k) plan.
Example 12. Husband died with a
retirement account, having named his three
children, in specified shares totaling 100%,
as the designated beneficiaries of that
account. During the alternate valuation
period, the account was divided into three
separate retirement accounts, each in the
name of a different child and funded with
that child’s designated share. The division of
the retirement account is not a transaction
described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section
by reason of paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
so the alternate valuation date for each of the
new accounts is the 6-month date.
Example 13. (i) D’s gross estate includes
real property. During the alternate valuation
period, D’s executor grants a conservation
easement that restricts the property’s use
under local law but does not satisfy the
requirements of section 2031(c). The
easement reduces the fair market value of the
property. The executor’s grant of the
conservation easement is a transaction
described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section and does not satisfy the exception
described in paragraph (c)(4) of this section.
Therefore, the alternate valuation date for the
property is the date the easement was
granted, and the value to be included in D’s
gross estate is the fair market value of the
property immediately prior to the grant.
(ii) Assume, instead, that the easement
satisfied the requirements of section 2031(c)
and, thus, satisfied the exception described
in paragraph (c)(4) of this section. Pursuant
to paragraph (c)(4), for purposes of
determining both the estate’s eligibility to
make an election under section 2032 and the
value of the property on the 6-month date,
the section 2031(c) qualified easement is
taken into account in determining both the
fair market value of the property on D’s date
of death and the fair market value of the
property on the 6-month date.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Examples. –The application of
paragraph (d) of this section regarding
‘‘included property’’ and ‘‘excluded
property’’ is illustrated by the following
examples.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Example 1. Assume that the decedent (D)
died on January 1, 1955: * * *
Example 2. (i) At death, D held a qualified
interest described in section 2702(b) in the
form of an annuity in a grantor retained
annuity trust (GRAT) D had created and
funded with $150,000. The trust agreement
provides for an annual annuity payment of
$12,000 per year to D or D’s estate for a term
of 10 years. At the expiration of the 10-year
term, the remainder is to be distributed to D’s
child. D dies prior to the expiration of the 10year term. On D’s date of death, the fair
market value of the property in the GRAT is
$325,000.
(ii) The only assets in the GRAT are an
apartment building and a bank account.
Three months after D’s date of death, an
annuity payment of $12,000 is paid in cash
to D’s estate. The monthly rents from the
apartment building total $500. After the date
of death and prior to the payment date, the
GRAT received $1,500 in excluded property
in the form of rent. Pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, $1,500 of the
$12,000 distributed is deemed to be excluded
property for purposes of section 2032. The
distribution is a transaction described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this section. On the
date of the distribution, the fair market value
of D’s interest in the GRAT before the
distribution equals the sum of the
distribution paid to D’s estate and the fair
market value of D’s interest in the GRAT
immediately after the distribution. Thus,
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of this
section, the alternate valuation date for the
$10,500 cash distribution, which is included
property, is the date of its distribution, and
the alternate valuation date of the GRAT is
the 6-month date.
(iii) The calculation of the value of D’s
interest in the GRAT includible in D’s gross
estate at D’s death pursuant to section 2036
must be computed under the special rule of
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B) of this section as a
result of the estate’s election to use the
alternate valuation method under section
2032. On the 6-month date, the section 7520
interest rate is 6% and the fair market value
of the property in the GRAT is $289,500.
Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B) of this
section, the fair market value of the GRAT
property deemed to be included property is
$300,000 ($289,500 plus $10,500).
Accordingly, for purposes of determining the
fair market value of the corpus includible in
D’s gross estate under section 2036(a)(1) as of
the 6-month date, see § 20.2036–1(c)(2), using
a GRAT corpus of $300,000 and, pursuant to
paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section, a section
7520 rate of 6%.
(f) Post-death factors and
occurrences.—(1) In general. The
election to use the alternate valuation
method under section 2032 permits
property includible in the gross estate
on the decedent’s date of death to be
valued on the 6-month date, rather than
on the date of death. Thus, the election
permits a valuation for Federal estate
tax purposes that reflects the impact of
factors such as economic or market
conditions, occurrences described in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
71497
alternate valuation period and was worth
only $40,000 on the 6-month date, the fair
market value of the remainder interest would
be $5,827 ($40,000 X 0.14568, the Table S
value for a 47 year old at a 7.4% interest
rate), even though A would have been 48
years old on the 6-month date.
Example 2. D created an intervivos
charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT)
described in section 664(d)(1). The trust
instrument directs the trustee to hold, invest,
and reinvest the corpus of the trust and to
pay to D for D’s life, and then to D’s child
(C) for C’s life, an amount each year equal to
6% of the initial fair market value of the
trust. At the termination of the trust, the
corpus, together with the accumulated
income, is to be distributed to N, a charitable
organization described in sections 170(c),
2055(a), and 2522(a). D died, survived by C.
D’s estate is entitled to a charitable deduction
under section 2055 for the present value of
N’s remainder interest in the CRAT. Pursuant
to § 1.664–2(c) and § 20.7520–2, in
determining the fair market value of the
remainder interest as of the alternate
valuation date, D’s executor may elect to use
the section 7520 rate in effect for either of the
two months immediately preceding the
month in which the alternate valuation date
occurs. Regardless of the section 7520 rate
selected, however, the factor to be used to
value the remainder interest is the
appropriate factor for C’s age on the date of
D’s death.
section 2054 (to the extent not
compensated by insurance or otherwise,
and not deducted under that section),
and other factors or occurrences during
the alternate valuation period, as set
forth in guidance issued by the
Secretary. Those factors and
occurrences do not include the mere
lapse of time described in paragraph
(f)(2) of this section, or transactions
described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) or (c)(2)
of this section that are not excluded
under paragraphs (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii)(A),
and (c)(4) of this section. Generally,
management decisions made in the
ordinary course of operating a business,
such as a corporation, a partnership, or
other business entity, are taken into
account under this section as
occurrences related to economic or
market conditions. To the extent,
however, that these decisions change
the ownership or control structure of the
business entity, or otherwise are
included in paragraph (c)(1)(i) or (c)(2)
of this section and are not excluded by
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii)(A), or
(c)(4) of this section, they will be treated
as described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section.
(2) Mere lapse of time. * * * The
application of this paragraph is
illustrated in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and
(f)(2)(ii) of this section:
(i) Life estates, remainders, and
similar interests. (A) The fair market
value of a life estate, remainder, term
interest or similar interest as of the
alternate valuation date is determined
by applying the methodology prescribed
in § 20.2031–7, subject to the following
two sentences. The age of each person
whose life expectancy may affect the
fair market value of the interest shall be
determined as of the date of the
decedent’s death. The fair market value
of the property and the applicable
interest rate under section 7520 shall be
determined using values applicable on
the alternate valuation date.
(B) Examples. The application of
paragraph (f)(2)(i)(A) of this section is
illustrated in the following examples.
(2)(ii) Patents. * * * Six months after
the date of the decedent’s death, the
patent was sold for its then fair market
value that had decreased to $60,000
because of the lapse of time. * * *
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of this
paragraph (f). In each example,
decedent’s (D’s) estate elects to value
D’s gross estate under the alternate
valuation method, so that the alternate
valuation date of the property includible
in the gross estate on D’s date of death
is either the transaction date or the 6month date. In each example, assume
that the only factors affecting value, and
the only occurrences described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i) or (c)(2) of this
section, taking place during the
alternate valuation period are those
described in the example.
Example 1. Assume that the decedent (D)
or D’s estate was entitled to receive certain
property upon the death of A, who was
entitled to the income from the property for
life. At the time of D’s death after April 30,
2009, the fair market value of the property
was $50,000, and A was 47 years and 5
months old. In the month in which D died,
the section 7520 rate was 6.2%, but rose to
7.4% on the 6-month date. The fair market
value of D’s remainder interest as of D’s date
of death was $9,336.00 ($50,000 x 0.18672,
the single life remainder factor from Table S
for a 47 year old at a 6.2% interest rate), as
illustrated in Example 1 of § 20.2031–
7T(d)(5). If, because of economic conditions,
the property declined in value during the
Example 1. At D’s death, D’s gross estate
includes a residence. During the alternate
valuation period, the fair market value of the
residence (as well as the residential market
in the area generally) declines due to a
reduction in the availability of credit
throughout the United States and,
consequently, a decline in the availability of
mortgages. The decline in the availability of
mortgages is an economic or market
condition. Therefore, in valuing the
residence on the 6-month date, the effect of
this decline on the fair market value of the
residence is to be taken into account.
Example 2. (i) At D’s death, D is the sole
shareholder of corporation Y, a
manufacturing company. Four months after
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
71498
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
D’s death, Y’s physical plant is destroyed as
a result of a natural disaster. The disaster
affects a large geographic area and, as a
result, the economy of that area is negatively
affected. Five months after D’s death, Y’s
Board of Directors votes to liquidate and
dissolve Y. The liquidation and dissolution
proceeding is not completed as of the 6month date. The natural disaster is a factor
that affects economic and market conditions.
Therefore, the disaster, to the extent not
compensated by insurance or otherwise, is
taken into account in valuing the Y stock on
the 6-month date.
(ii) Assume instead that Y’s plant is
severely damaged due to flooding from the
failure of pipes in the facility. The damage
is an occurrence described in section 2054.
Therefore, the damage, to the extent not
compensated by insurance or otherwise, is
taken into account in valuing the property on
the 6-month date.
Example 3. At D’s death, D has an interest
in an S corporation, W. During the alternate
valuation period, it is discovered that an
employee of W has embezzled significant
assets from W. W does not reasonably expect
to recover the funds or any damages from the
employee, and insurance proceeds are not
sufficient to cover the loss. The theft is an
occurrence described in section 2054.
Therefore, the theft, to the extent not
compensated by insurance or otherwise, is
taken into account in valuing D’s interest in
W on the 6-month date.
(h) Effective/applicability date. * * *
All of paragraph (c)(2) of this section
except the second sentence of the
introductory text, all of paragraph (c)(3)
of this section except paragraph
(c)(3)(i)(C) of this section, the chart in
Example 1 of paragraph (e) of this
section, all of paragraph (f)(2) of this
section except the last sentence, and the
first and third sentences in paragraph
(f)(2)(ii) of this section are applicable to
decedents dying after August 16, 1954.
All of paragraphs (a) introductory text,
(a)(1), (a)(2), (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii),
(c)(1)(iv), (c)(3)(i)(C), (c)(4), (c)(5), (f)(1),
(f)(2)(i), and (f)(3) of this section, the
second sentence of the introductory text
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, all of
paragraph (e) of this section except the
chart in Example 1, the last sentence in
the introductory text of paragraph (f)(2)
of this section, and the second sentence
in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section are
applicable to estates of decedents dying
on or after the date of publication of the
Treasury decision adopting these rules
as final in the Federal Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–29921 Filed 11–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2012–1; Order No. 963]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is
establishing a docket in response to a
Postal Service request for an informal
rulemaking on proposed changes in
certain analytical methods used in
periodic reporting. The proposed
changes affect Foreign Origin mail;
Undeliverable As Addressed Parcel
Select pieces; Express Mail; Standard
Mail Presort Letters; Media Mail/Library
Mail; Special Services; and Return
Receipt. Establishing this docket will
allow the Commission to consider the
Postal Service’s proposal and comments
from the public.
DATES: Comments are due: December 5,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing
Online’’ link in the banner at the top of
the Commission’s Web site (https://www.
prc.gov) or by directly accessing the
Commission’s Filing Online system at
https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as the source for case-related
information for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at (202) 789–6820 (case-related
information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov
(electronic filing assistance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 1, 2011, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
initiate an informal rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes in the
analytical methods approved for use in
periodic reporting.1 These changes are
contained in Proposals Nine through
Fifteen, which are described below.
Proposal Nine: proposed change in
method for Inbound Revenue, Pieces,
and Weight (RPW) reporting. The
purpose of Proposal Nine is to improve
the method for distributing cost segment
14 (domestic transportation) costs of
Foreign Origin mail to countries and
SUMMARY:
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service
Requesting Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Proposed Changes in Analytical Principles
(Proposals Nine–Fifteen), November 1, 2011
(Petition).
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
country groups in the International Cost
and Revenue Analysis (ICRA). Id. at 3.
Specifically, Proposal Nine would
substitute a weight-based method for the
current piece-based method. Id.
The Postal Service explains that the
ICRA began reporting inbound mail
statistics separately by country or
country group in FY 2008. Id. It
contends that at that time, the method
for distributing domestic transportation
costs for inbound mail should have
changed from the piece-based method to
a weight-based method to align with the
weight-based method for distributing
domestic transportation costs for U.S.
Origin international mail. Id.
The Postal Service concludes that
Proposal Nine would be an
improvement over the piece-based
method because of the requirement that
inbound mail statistics be reported by
country or country group, and because
weight per piece varies significantly
across countries and country groups. Id.
at 4.
The Postal Service illustrates the
impact that Proposal Nine would have
had in FY 2010 in the Excel workbook
‘‘Proposal9.xls,’’ filed under seal. Id. It
states that the results for products are
not affected and that the impact is most
significant for inbound mail from
Canada. Id.
Proposal Ten: proposed change in the
In-Office Cost System (IOCS) for Parcel
Select Pieces that are Undeliverable As
Addressed (UAA). The purpose of
Proposal Ten is to change the way that
the costs of UAA Parcel Select pieces
are attributed, which would improve the
accuracy of Parcel Select attributed
costs. Id. at 6. The Postal Service
proposes that IOCS designate costs for
UAA Parcel Select to Parcel Select. Id.
The Postal Service explains that it
charged Parcel Post prices for UAA
Parcel Select pieces for most of FY 2011
and that the IOCS tallies relating to
these pieces are currently designated as
Parcel Post. Id. Beginning on June 24,
2011, the Postal Service began charging
UAA Parcel Select pieces the Parcel
Select non-presort price plus an
additional $3.00 fee. Id. The revenue for
these pieces is ascribed to Parcel Select.
Id.
Thus, the Postal Service concludes
that UAA Parcel Select pieces should
also be assigned to Parcel Select in
IOCS. Id. It illustrates the impact that
Proposal Ten would have on FY 2010
IOCS dollar-weighted tallies in a table
titled ‘‘Changes in IOCS dollar-weight
tallies due to change in treatment of
UAA parcel select’’ of its Petition. Id.
Proposal Eleven: proposed change for
delivery cost savings for Negotiated
Service Agreement (NSA) Express Mail.
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 223 (Friday, November 18, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71491-71498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29921]
[[Page 71491]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 20
[REG-112196-07]
RIN 1545-BH64
Gross Estate; Election to Value on Alternate Valuation Date
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that provide
guidance respecting the election to use the alternate valuation method
under section 2032 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The proposed
regulations will affect estates that file Form 706, United States
Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return and elect to use
the alternate valuation method. This document also provides notice of a
public hearing on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by February 16,
2012. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing
scheduled for March 9, 2012, at 10 a.m. must be received by February
17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-112196-07), Internal
Revenue Service, Room 5203, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
112196-07), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224; or sent electronically via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS-REG-
112196-07). The public hearing will be held in the Auditorium,
beginning at 10 a.m., at the Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Theresa M. Melchiorre, (202) 622-3090; concerning submissions of
comments, the hearing, and/or to be placed on the building access list
to attend the hearing, Richard Hurst at
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov or at (202) 622-7180 (not toll-
free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 2001 imposes a tax on the transfer of the taxable estate of
every decedent who is a citizen or resident of the United States.
Section 2033 provides that the value of the gross estate includes the
value of all property to the extent of the interest of the decedent at
the time of his death. Section 2031(a) provides that the value of the
decedent's gross estate includes the value at the time of the
decedent's death of all property, real or personal, tangible or
intangible, wherever situated. Section 2032(a) provides that the value
of the gross estate may be determined, if the executor so elects, by
valuing all the property includible in the gross estate as follows.
Property distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of during
the 6-month period immediately after the date of death (alternate
valuation period) is valued as of the date of distribution, sale,
exchange, or other disposition (transaction date). I.R.C. section
2032(a)(1). Property not distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise
disposed of during the alternate valuation period is valued as of the
date that is 6 months after the decedent's death (6-month date). I.R.C.
section 2032(a)(2). Any interest or estate that is affected by the mere
lapse of time is includible at its value as of the date of death
(instead of any later date), with adjustment for any difference in its
value as of the later date that is not due to the mere lapse of time.
I.R.C. section 2032(a)(3).
Section 2031(c) was enacted by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, 105
Public Law 34 section 508(a), 111 Stat. 788 (August 5, 1997). Pursuant
to this section, a decedent's estate may elect to exclude from the
gross estate a portion of the fair market value of property includible
in the decedent's gross estate by granting a qualified conservation
easement on that property after the date of the decedent's death but on
or before the due date (including extensions) for filing the Form 706,
United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return.
On April 25, 2008, a notice of proposed rulemaking (Reg-112196-07)
relating to amendments to the Estate Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 20)
under section 2032 of the Code was published in the Federal Register
(73 FR 22300). Those regulations (73 FR 22300) proposed to clarify that
the election to use the alternate valuation method under section 2032
is available to estates that experience a reduction in the value of the
gross estate during the alternate valuation period, but only to the
extent that the reduction in value is due to market conditions and not
to other post-death events (events occurring during the alternate
valuation period). The term ''market conditions'' was defined as events
outside of the control of the decedent (or the decedent's executor or
trustee) or other person whose property is being valued that affect the
fair market value of the property includible in the decedent's gross
estate. Changes in value due to mere lapse of time or to other post-
death events would be ignored in determining the value of the
decedent's gross estate under the alternate valuation method.
No hearing was held because no person or organization requested to
speak at a hearing. However, written comments were received. Some
commentators expressed concern that the proposed regulations (73 FR
22300) would create administrative problems because an estate would be
required to trace property and to obtain appraisals based on
hypothetical property. Some commentators stated that the current and
the proposed regulations (73 FR 22300) did not adequately address the
application of section 2032 to certain types of property, such as
property the title to which passes at death due to contract, and to
transactions carried out during the alternate valuation period between
an estate and partnerships, corporations, or other entities. For
example, Sec. 20.2032-1(c)(1) does not address the consequences of the
estate contributing property to a partnership during the alternate
valuation period.
In addition, commentators requested guidance on the effect of a
section 2032 election in calculating the portion of a trust includible
in the decedent's gross estate under section 2036. This would arise in
the situation where the decedent had retained the right to an annuity,
unitrust, or other payment from the trust for life, for any period not
ascertainable without reference to the grantor's death, or for a period
that does not in fact end before the grantor's death. Further, some
commentators requested guidance on the treatment of the grant, during
the alternate valuation period, of a qualified conservation easement
under section 2031(c).
Many commentators acknowledged that estates may enter into a
transaction during the alternate valuation period that could result in
the abuse of the section 2032 election. They suggested that the IRS and
Treasury Department would better serve taxpayers and address any
potential abuse by ensuring that the regulations address the issues
described in this preamble rather than finalizing the approach taken in
the proposed regulations.
[[Page 71492]]
In view of the comments, the Treasury Department and the IRS are
withdrawing the proposed regulations (73 FR 22300) by the publication
of these proposed regulations in the Federal Register. Nevertheless,
see the background section of those proposed regulations (73 FR 22300)
for a summary of the legislative history of section 2032 and the
purpose for issuing these proposed regulations.
This document contains revised proposed amendments to the
regulations promulgated under section 2032. These proposed regulations
make irrelevant, for purposes of determining the value of property as
of the transaction date or the 6-month date, whichever is applicable
(alternate valuation date), the percentage of ownership or control in
an entity includible in the gross estate and the extent of
participation by the estate (or other holder of property includible in
the gross estate) in the relevant post-death events.
Certain provisions in the current regulations that have been in
effect since 1954 are restated in the proposed regulations for purposes
of clarity. The effective date of those provisions is not changed.
Explanation of Provisions
These regulations propose to amend several sections of Sec.
20.2032-1. Generally, paragraph (c)(1)(i) identifies transactions that
constitute distributions, sales, exchanges, or dispositions of
property. If an estate's (or other holder's) property is subject to
such a transaction during the alternate valuation period, the estate
must value that property on the transaction date. The value included in
the gross estate is the fair market value of that property on the date
of and immediately prior to the transaction. The term ``property''
refers to the property includible in the decedent's gross estate under
section 2033.
Sections 20.2032-1(c)(1)(ii) and (c)(1)(iii)(A) identify two
exceptions to the rule in Sec. 20.2032-1(c)(1)(i). If either exception
applies, the estate may use the 6-month date and value the property
held on that date. The exception in Sec. 20.2032-1(c)(1)(ii) applies
only to transactions in which an interest in a corporation,
partnership, or other entity (entity) includible in the decedent's
gross estate is exchanged for one or more different interests (for
example, a different class of stock) in the same entity or in an
acquiring or resulting entity or entities during the alternate
valuation period. Such transactions may include, without limitation,
reorganizations, recapitalizations, mergers, or similar transactions.
This exception substitutes a fair market value test for the corporate
provisions in the current regulations. Specifically, this paragraph
proposes that, if, during the alternate valuation period, the interest
in an entity includible in the gross estate is exchanged for a
different interest in the same entity, or in an acquiring or resulting
entity or entities, and if the fair market value of the interest on the
date of the exchange equals the fair market value of the property for
which it was exchanged, then the transaction will not be treated as an
exchange for purposes of section 2032(a)(1). As a result, the estate
may use the 6-month date to value the interest in the same entity or in
the acquiring or resulting entity or entities received in the exchange.
For this purpose, the fair market values of the surrendered property
and received interest are deemed to be equal if the difference between
the fair market values of the surrendered property and the received
interest does not exceed 5 percent of the fair market value of the
surrendered property as of the transaction date. This section has no
effect on any other provision of the Code that is applicable to the
transaction. For example, the provisions of chapter 14 may apply even
if the transaction does not result in a deemed exchange for section
2032 purposes as a result of satisfying the provisions of Sec.
20.2032-1(c)(1)(ii).
Section 20.2032-1(c)(1)(iii)(A) proposes that, if, during the
alternate valuation period, an estate (or other holder) receives a
distribution from a business entity, bank account, or retirement trust
(entity) and an interest in that entity is includible in the decedent's
gross estate, the estate may use the 6-month date to value the property
held in the estate if the following requirement is satisfied. The fair
market value of the interest in the entity includible in the gross
estate immediately before the distribution must equal the sum of the
fair market value of the distributed property on the date of the
distribution and the fair market value of the interest in the entity
includible in the gross estate immediately after the distribution. If
this requirement is not satisfied, the estate must use the fair market
value as of the distribution date and immediately prior to the
distribution of the entire interest in the entity includible in the
gross estate. For purposes of this section, any distribution is deemed
to consist first of excluded property (as defined in Sec. 20.2032-
1(d)), if any, and then of included property.
Section 20.2032-1(c)(1)(iv) proposes an aggregation rule to use in
calculating the fair market value of each portion of property that is,
or is deemed to be distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed
of during the alternate valuation period, and that remains in the gross
estate on the 6-month date.
Section 20.2032-1(c)(iii)(B) provides a special rule to use in
determining the portion of a trust includible, by reason of a retained
interest, in the decedent's gross estate under section 2036 as of the
alternate valuation date. An example is added to Sec. 20.2032-1(e) to
illustrate this special rule and the effect of the provisions of Sec.
20.2032-1(d) and Sec. 20.2032-1(f)(2)(i) on this calculation.
Section 20.2032-1(c)(2) is amended to clarify when property, the
title to which passes by contract or by operation of law, is deemed to
be distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of for section
2032 purposes. Section 20.2032-1(c)(3) is amended to clarify the person
or entity that will be treated as having sold, exchanged, or otherwise
disposed of the property for section 2032 purposes.
Section 20.2032-1(c)(4) is added to provide that if Congress, by
statute, has deemed that a post-death event has occurred on the
decedent's date of death, the post-death event will not result in a
distribution, sale, exchange, or other disposition of the property for
section 2032 purposes. To date, the only post-death event that
satisfies this exception is the grant, during the alternate valuation
period, of a conservation easement in accordance with section 2031(c).
With respect to such a grant, for section 2032 purposes, the estate
must determine the fair market value of the property as of the date of
death and as of the alternate valuation date, taking into account the
effect of the easement on each of those valuation dates.
Section 20.2032-1(c)(5) provides examples, not intended to be
exclusive, illustrating the provisions of Sec. 20.2032-1(c).
Section 20.2032-1(f) is revised to clarify the types of factors
that impact the fair market value of property and the effect of which
will be recognized under section 2032. This paragraph also explains and
illustrates these rules.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
Section 20.2032-1(c)(2) except the second sentence of the
introductory text, Sec. 20.2032-1(c)(3) except Sec. 20.2032-
1(c)(3)(i)(C), the chart in Example 1 of Sec. 20.2032-1(e), Sec.
20.2032-1(f)(2) except the last sentence, and the first and third
sentences in Sec. 20.2032-1(f)(2)(ii) are
[[Page 71493]]
applicable to decedents dying after August 16, 1954. Sections 20.2032-
1(a) introductory text, 20.2032-1(a)(1), 20.2032-1(a)(2), 20.2032-
1(c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv), (c)(3)(i)(C), (c)(4),
(c)(5), (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), and (f)(3), the second sentence in Sec.
20.2032-1(c)(2) introductory text, Sec. 20.2032-1(e) except the chart
in Example 1, the last sentence in Sec. 20.2032-1(f)(2) introductory
text, and the second sentence in Sec. 20.2032-1(f)(2)(ii) are
applicable to estates of decedents dying on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final in
the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this proposed regulation is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations and, because these regulations do not
impose on small entities a collection of information requirement, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required. Pursuant
to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this regulation has
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The IRS and Treasury Department also request comments on the
clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to
understand. All comments will be available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled for March 9, 2012 at 10 a.m. in
Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must use the main building entrance 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. In addition, all visitors must
present photo identification to enter the building. Because of access
restrictions, visitors will not be admitted beyond the immediate
entrance area more than 30 minutes before the hearing starts. For more
information about having your name placed on the list to attend the
hearing, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit written (a
signed original and eight (8) copies) or electronic comments by
February 16, 2012 and an outline of the topics to be discussed and the
time to be devoted to each topic by February 17, 2012. A period of 10
minutes will be allotted to each person for making comments. An agenda
showing the scheduling of the speakers will be prepared after the
deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the agenda will
be available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Theresa M.
Melchiorre, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 20
Estate taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (Reg-112196-07) that was published in the Federal Register
on April 25, 2008 (73 FR 22300) is withdrawn.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 20 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 20--ESTATE TAX; ESTATES OF DECEDENTS DYING AFTER AUGUST 16,
1954
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 20 continues to read
in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Sec. 20.2032-1 [Amended]
Par. 2. For each entry in the table, each paragraph in the ``Old
Paragraph'' column is redesignated as indicated in the ``New
Paragraph'' column:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old paragraph New paragraph
------------------------------------------------------------------------
20.2032-1(c)(1) 20.2032-1(c)(1)(i)
20.2032-1(c)(3) 20.2032-1(c)(3)(i)
20.2032-1(c)(3)(i) 20.2032-1(c)(3)(i)(A)
20.2032-1(c)(3)(ii) 20.2032-1(c)(3)(i)(B)
20.2032-1(c)(3)(iii) 20.2032-1(c)(3)(i)(C)
20.2032-1(c)(3)(iv) 20.2032-1(c)(3)(i)(D)
20.2032-1(c)(3)(v) 20.2032-1(c)(3)(i)(E)
20.2032-1(f) 20.2032-1(f)(2)
20.2032-1(f)(1) 20.2032-1(f)(2)(i)
20.2032-1(f)(2) 20.2032-1(f)(2)(ii)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Par. 3. Section 20.2032-1 is amended by:
1. Revising paragraph (a) introductory text.
2. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2).
3. Revising newly-designated paragraph (c)(1)(i), newly-designated
paragraph (c)(3)(i)(C), paragraph (e) introductory text, the
introductory text of paragraph (e) Example 1 preceding the table, the
last sentence in newly-designated paragraph (f)(2) introductory text,
newly-designated paragraph (f)(2)(i), and the second sentence in newly-
designated paragraph (f)(2)(ii).
4. Adding new paragraphs (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv),
(c)(4), (c)(5), (f)(1), and (f)(3).
5. Adding a paragraph heading and a new second sentence in
paragraph (c)(2) introductory text.
6. Adding a paragraph heading to paragraph (c)(3).
7. Designating the undesignated language following newly-designated
paragraph (c)(3)(i)(E) as paragraph (c)(3)(ii) and adding a paragraph
heading to this paragraph.
8. Designating the table in paragraph (e) as Example 1 and adding
paragraph (e) Example 2 following the table.
9. Revising the paragraph heading and adding two sentences at the
end of paragraph (h).
The additions and revisions read as follows.
Sec. 20.2032-1 Alternate valuation.
(a) In general.--In general, section 2032 provides for the
valuation of a decedent's gross estate at a date (alternate valuation
date) other than the date of the decedent's death. More specifically,
if an executor elects the alternate valuation method under section
2032, the property includible in the decedent's gross estate on the
date of death (decedent's interest) is valued as of whichever of the
following dates is applicable:
(1) Any property distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise
disposed of within 6 months (1 year, if the decedent died on or before
December 31, 1970) after the decedent's death (alternate valuation
period) is valued as of the date on which it is first distributed,
sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of (transaction date).
[[Page 71494]]
(2) Any property not distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise
disposed of during the alternate valuation period is valued as of the
date 6 months (1 year, if the decedent died on or before December 31,
1970) after the date of the decedent's death (6-month date).
* * * * *
(c) Meaning of ``distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise
disposed of''--(1) In general--
(i) Transactions included. The phrase ``distributed, sold,
exchanged, or otherwise disposed of'' comprehends all possible ways by
which property ceases to form a part of the gross estate. This phrase
includes, but is not limited to:
(A) The use of money on hand at the date of the decedent's death to
pay funeral or other expenses of the decedent's estate;
(B) The use of money on hand at the date of the decedent's death to
invest in other property;
(C) The exercise of employee stock options;
(D) The surrender of stock for corporate assets in partial or
complete liquidation of a corporation, and similar transactions
involving partnerships or other entities;
(E) The distribution by the estate (or other holder) of included
property as defined in paragraph (d) of this section;
(F) The transfer or exchange of property for other property,
whether or not gain or loss is currently recognized for income tax
purposes;
(G) The contribution of cash or other property to a corporation,
partnership, or other entity, whether or not gain or loss is currently
recognized for income tax purposes;
(H) The exchange of interests in a corporation, partnership, or
other entity (entity) for one or more different interests (for example,
a different class of stock) in the same entity or in an acquiring or
resulting entity or entities (see, however, paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of
this section); and
(I) Any other change in the ownership structure or interests in, or
in the assets of, a corporation, partnership, or other entity, an
interest in which is includible in the gross estate, such that the
included property after the change does not reasonably represent the
included property at the decedent's date of death (see, however,
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section). Such a change in the
ownership structure or interests in or in the assets of an entity
includes, without limitation--
(1) The dilution of the decedent's ownership interest in the entity
due to the issuance of additional ownership interests in that entity;
(2) An increase in the decedent's ownership interest in the entity
due to the entity's redemption of the interest of a different owner;
(3) A reinvestment of the entity's assets; and
(4) A distribution or disbursement of property (other than excluded
property as defined in paragraph (d) of this section) by the entity
(other than expenses, such as rents and salaries, paid in the ordinary
course of the entity's business), with the effect that the fair market
value of the entity before the occurrence does not equal the fair
market value of the entity immediately thereafter.
(ii) Exchange of an interest in an existing corporation,
partnership, or other entity includible in the gross estate. If an
interest in a corporation, partnership, or other entity (entity) is
includible in the gross estate at death and that interest is exchanged
as described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(H) of this section for one or more
different interests in the same entity or in an acquiring or resulting
entity or entities, the transaction does not result in an exchange or
disposition under section 2032(a)(1) and paragraph (c)(1)(i)(H) of this
section if, on the date of the exchange, the fair market value of the
interest in the entity equals the fair market value of the interest(s)
in the same entity or the acquiring or resulting entity or entities.
Such transactions may include, without limitation, reorganizations,
recapitalizations, mergers, or similar transactions. In determining
whether the exchanged properties have the same fair market value, a
difference in value equal to or less than 5 percent of the fair market
value, as of the transaction date, of the property interest includible
in the gross estate on the decedent's date of death is ignored. If the
transaction satisfies the requirements of this paragraph, the property
to be valued on the 6-month date (or on the transaction date, if any,
subsequent to this transaction) is the property received in the
exchange, rather than the property includible in the decedent's gross
estate at the date of death. This paragraph has no effect on any other
provision of the Internal Revenue Code that is applicable to the
transaction. For example, even if the transaction does not result in a
deemed exchange as a result of satisfying the requirements of this
paragraph, the provisions of chapter 14 may be applicable to determine
fair market value for Federal estate tax purposes.
(iii) Distributions from an account or entity in which the decedent
held an interest at death.
(A) In general. If during the alternate valuation period, an estate
(or other holder of the decedent's interest) receives a distribution or
disbursement (to the extent the distribution or disbursement consists
of included property, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section)
(payment) from a partnership, corporation, trust (including an IRA,
Roth IRA, 403(b), 401(k), Thrift Savings Plan, etc.), bank account or
similar asset, or other entity (entity), and an interest in that entity
is includible in the gross estate, the payment does not result in a
distribution under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I) of this section. However,
this rule applies only if, on the date of the payment, the fair market
value of the decedent's interest in the entity before the payment
equals the sum of the fair market value of the payment made to the
estate (or other holder of the decedent's interest in the entity) and
the fair market value of the decedent's interest in the entity, not
including any excluded property, after the payment. In this case, the
alternate valuation date of the payment is the date of the payment, and
the alternate valuation date of the decedent's remaining interest in
the entity, if any, is the 6-month date (or the transaction date, if
any, subsequent to this payment). If this requirement is not met, the
payment is a distribution under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section,
and the alternate valuation date of the decedent's entire interest in
the entity is the date of the payment. For purposes of this section, a
distribution or disbursement is deemed to consist first of excluded
property, if any, and then of included property, as those terms are
defined in paragraph (d) of this section.
(B) Special rule. If the decedent's interest in an entity that is
includible in the gross estate consists of the amount needed to produce
an annuity, unitrust, remainder, or other such payment valued under
section 2036, then assuming the distribution satisfies the general rule
set forth in paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, the value of
each distribution (to the extent it is deemed to consist of included
property) payable (whether or not actually paid) during the alternate
valuation period shall be added to the value of the entity on the
alternate valuation date. The sum of the fair market value of these
distributions when made and the fair market value of the entity on the
alternate valuation date shall be used as the fair market value of the
entity in computing the amount, valued as of the alternate valuation
date, to be included in the decedent's gross estate under
[[Page 71495]]
section 2036. See Example 2 of paragraph (e) of this section.
(iv) Aggregation. For purposes of this section, a special
aggregation rule applies in two situations to determine the value to be
included in the gross estate pursuant to an alternate valuation
election. Those two situations arise when, during the alternate
valuation period, less than all of the interest includible in the
decedent's gross estate in a particular property is the subject of a
transaction described in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii),
or (c)(2) of this section. In one situation, one or more portions of
the includible interest are subject to such a transaction and a portion
is still held on the 6-month date. In the other situation, the entire
interest includible in the gross estate is disposed of in two or more
such transactions during the alternate valuation period, so that no
part of that interest remains on the 6-month date. In both of these
situations, the fair market value of each portion of the interest
includible in the gross estate is to be determined as follows. The fair
market value of each portion subject to such a transaction, and the
portion remaining, if any, on the 6-month date, is the fair market
value, as of the transaction date, or the 6-month date for any
remaining portion, of the entire interest includible in the gross
estate on the decedent's date of death, multiplied by a fraction. The
numerator of that fraction is the portion of the interest subject to
that transaction, or the portion remaining on the 6-month date, and the
denominator is the entire interest includible in the gross estate at
the decedent's date of death.
(2) Property distributed. * * * Property is not considered
``distributed'' merely because property passes directly at death as a
result of a beneficiary designation or other contractual arrangement or
by operation of law. * * *
(3) Person able to sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of property
includible in the gross estate. (i) * * *
(A) * * *
(B) * * *
(C) An heir, devisee, or other person to whom title to property
passes directly on death by reason of a beneficiary designation or
other contractual arrangement or by operation of law;
(D) * * *
(E) * * *
(ii) Binding contracts. * * *
(4) Certain post-death events. If the effect of any other provision
of the Internal Revenue Code is that a post-death event is deemed to
have occurred on the date of death, the post-death event will not be
considered a transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this
section. For example, the grant, during the alternate valuation period,
of a qualified conservation easement in accordance with section 2031(c)
is not a transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
Pursuant to section 2031(c), the post-death grant of the easement is
effective for Federal estate tax purposes as of the date of the
decedent's death. As a result, for purposes of determining both the
estate's eligibility to make an election under this section and the
value of the property on the alternate valuation date, the fair market
value of the property as of the date of death must be compared to the
fair market value of that property as of the alternate valuation date,
in each case as that value is adjusted by reason of the existence of
the section 2031(c) qualified easement.
(5) Examples. The application of paragraph (c) of this section is
illustrated in the following examples. In each example, decedent's
(D's) estate elects to value D's gross estate under the alternate
valuation method, so that the alternate valuation date of the property
includible in the gross estate on D's date of death is either the
transaction date or the 6-month date. In each example, assume that the
only factors affecting value during the alternate valuation period, and
the only occurrences described in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (c)(2) of
this section, are those described in the example.
Example 1. At D's death, D owned property with a fair market
value of $100X. Two months after D's death (Date 1), D's executor
and D's family members formed a limited partnership. D's executor
contributed all of the property to the partnership and received an
interest in the partnership in exchange. The investment of the
property in the partnership is a transaction described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(F) and/or (G) of this section. As a result, the alternate
valuation date of the property is the date of its contribution and
the value to be included in D's gross estate is the fair market
value of the property immediately prior to its contribution to the
partnership. The result would be the same if D's estate instead had
contributed property to a limited partnership formed prior to D's
death by D and/or other parties, related or unrelated to D. Further,
the result would be the same if D's estate had contributed the
property to a corporation, publicly traded or otherwise, or other
entity after D's death and prior to the 6-month date.
Example 2. At D's death, D held incentive stock options that
were qualified under section 422. D's executor exercised all of the
stock options prior to the 6-month date. The exercise of the stock
options is a transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) of this
section. Thus, the alternate valuation date of the stock options is
the date of their exercise and the value to be included in D's gross
estate is the fair market value of the stock options immediately
prior to their exercise. The result would be the same if the stock
options were not qualified under section 422 and were taxable under
section 83 upon exercise.
Example 3. D's gross estate includes a controlling interest in
Y, a corporation. During the alternate valuation period, Y issued
additional shares of stock and awarded them to certain key
employees. D's interest in Y was diluted to a non-controlling
interest by Y's issuance of the additional stock. Y's issuance of
the stock is a transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I) of
this section. The value to be included in D's gross estate is the
fair market value of D's stock immediately prior to Y's issuance of
the additional stock. The result would be the same if D's estate
included a minority interest in Y on the date of death and that
interest became a controlling interest during the alternate
valuation period as the result of Y's redemption of the shares of
another shareholder.
Example 4. At D's death, D owned stock in Y, a corporation.
During the alternate valuation period, the Board of Directors of Y
contributed all of Y's assets to a partnership in exchange for
interests therein. The contribution is a transaction described in
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(3) of this section. Therefore, the alternate
valuation date of D's stock in Y is the date of the reinvestment of
Y's assets and the value to be included in D's gross estate is the
fair market value of D's stock in Y immediately prior to the
reinvestment. The result would be the same even if the Board of
Directors had contributed only a portion of Y's assets to the
partnership during the alternate valuation period.
Example 5. (i) At D's death, D owned common stock in Y, a
corporation. Two months after D's death (Date 1), there was a
reorganization of Y. In the reorganization, D's estate exchanged all
of its stock for a new class of stock in X. On the date of the
reorganization, the difference between the fair market value of the
stock D's estate received and the fair market value on that date of
the stock includible in D's gross estate at death was greater than
5% of the fair market value, as of the date of the reorganization,
of the stock D held at death. The reorganization is a transaction
described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(H) of this section and does not
satisfy the exception described in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this
section. Thus, the alternate valuation date is the date of the
reorganization and the value to be included in D's gross estate is
the fair market value of the stock immediately prior to the
reorganization. This result is not affected by whether or not the
reorganization is a tax-free reorganization for Federal income tax
purposes. The result would be the same if the stock had been held,
for example, in an IRA with designated beneficiaries. See paragraph
(c)(3)(i)(C) of this section.
(ii) If, instead, the difference between the two fair market
values as of the date of the reorganization was equal to or less
than 5% of the fair market value, as of the date of the
reorganization, of the stock D held at death, the reorganization
would satisfy the exception provided in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of
[[Page 71496]]
this section. Thus, the alternate valuation date would be the 6-
month date. The value to be included in D's gross estate would be
the fair market value, determined as of the 6-month date, of the new
class of stock in Y that D's estate received in the reorganization.
Example 6. (i) At D's death, D owned an interest in Partnership
X that is includible in D's gross estate. During the alternate
valuation period, X made a cash distribution to each of the
partners. The distribution consists entirely of included property as
defined in paragraph (d) of this section. The distribution is a
transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this section.
On the date of the distribution, the fair market value of D's
interest in X before the distribution equaled the sum of the
distribution paid to D's estate and the fair market value of D's
interest in X immediately after the distribution. Thus, pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, the alternate valuation
date of the property distributed is the date of the distribution,
and the alternate valuation date of D's interest in X is the 6-month
date.
(ii) If, instead, the fair market value of D's interest in X
before the distribution did not equal the sum of the distribution
paid to D's estate and the fair market value of D's interest in X
(not including any excluded property) immediately after the
distribution, then pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this
section, the alternate valuation date of D's entire interest in X
would be the date of the distribution.
Example 7. D died owning 100% of Blackacre. D's will directs
that an undivided 70% interest in Blackacre is to pass to Trust A
for the benefit of D's surviving spouse, and an undivided 30%
interest is to pass to Trust B for the benefit of D's surviving
child. Three months after D's death (Date 1), the executor of D's
estate distributed a 70% interest in Blackacre to Trust A. Four
months after D's death (Date 2), the executor of D's estate
distributed a 30% interest in Blackacre to Trust B. The following
values are includible in D's gross estate pursuant to paragraphs
(c)(1)(i)(E) and (c)(1)(iv): The fair market value of the 70%
interest in Blackacre, determined by calculating 70% of the fair
market value of all (100%) of Blackacre as of Date 1; and the fair
market value of the 30% interest in Blackacre, determined by
calculating 30% of the fair market value of all (100%) of Blackacre
as of Date 2.
Example 8. At D's death, D owned 100% of the units of a limited
liability company (LLC). Two months after D's death (Date 1), D's
executor sold 20% of the LLC units to an unrelated third party.
Three months after D's death (Date 2), D's executor sold 40% of the
LLC units to D's child. On the 6-month date, the estate held the
remaining 40% of the units in the LLC. The alternate valuation date
of the units sold is their sale date (Date 1 and Date 2,
respectively) pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. The
alternate valuation date of the units remaining in the estate is the
6-month date, as these units have not been distributed, sold,
exchanged, or otherwise disposed of in a transaction described in
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) or (c)(2) of this section prior to this date.
Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this section, the value of the
units disposed of on Date 1 and Date 2 is the fair market value of
the 20% and 40% interests, determined by calculating 20% and 40% of
the fair market value as of Date 1 and Date 2, respectively, of all
the units (100%) includible in the gross estate at D's death.
Similarly, the value of the units held on the 6-month date to be
included in D's gross estate is the fair market value of those
units, determined by taking 40% of the fair market value on the 6-
month date of all of the units (100%) includible in the gross estate
at D's death. As a result, the fact that the partial sales resulted
in the creation of three minority interests is not taken into
account in valuing under section 2032 any portion of the LLC
interests held by D at D's death.
Example 9. Husband died owning an interest in a brokerage
account titled in the names of Husband and Wife with rights of
survivorship. On Husband's death, the account held marketable
securities, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, certificates of
deposit, and cash. During the alternate valuation period, Wife's
stockbroker advised her that the account could not be held under the
social security number of a deceased individual. Accordingly,
approximately one month after Husband's death, Wife directed the
stockbroker to transfer the account into an account titled in Wife's
sole name. Because title to the joint account passes to Wife at the
moment of Husband's death by operation of law, the transfer of the
joint account into an account in Wife's sole name is not a
transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
Accordingly, the value of the assets held in Wife's solely owned
account will be includible in Husband's gross estate at their fair
market value on the 6-month date. The result would be the same if
the brokerage firm automatically transferred title to the account
into Wife's name, or if Wife changed the beneficiary designation for
the account. Finally, the result would be the same if, instead of an
account with a brokerage firm, the assets were held in Husband's
retirement account (IRA or similar trust such as a Roth IRA, 403(b)
plan, or 401(k) plan) or Wife's ownership of the account was the
result of a contract (a beneficiary designation form) rather than
operation of law.
Example 10. Assume the same facts as in Example 9 except that,
during the alternate valuation period, Wife directed the stockbroker
to sell a bond in the account. The sale is a transaction described
in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this section. Wife is an individual
described in paragraph (c)(3)(i)(D) of this section. Thus, the
alternate valuation date of the bond is the date of its sale. The
values to be included in D's gross estate are the fair market value
of the bond on date of its sale, and the fair market value of the
balance of the account on the 6-month date. The result would be the
same if the bond had matured and was retired during the alternate
valuation period. The result also would be the same if the bond was
held within a retirement account (IRA or similar trust such as a
Roth IRA, 403(b) plan, or 401(k) plan).
Example 11. Assume the same facts as in Example 9 except that,
during the alternate valuation period, Wife withdrew cash from the
account or otherwise received income or other disbursements from the
account. Each such withdrawal or disbursement from the account (to
the extent it consists of included property as defined in paragraph
(d) of this section) is a distribution described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this section. Provided that, on the date of each
distribution, the fair market value of the account before the
distribution (not including excluded property) equals the sum of the
included property distributed and the fair market value of the
included property in the account immediately after the distribution
in accordance with paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, the
alternate valuation date for each distribution is the date of the
distribution and the alternate valuation date for the account is the
6-month date. The value to be included in the gross estate is the
fair market value of each distribution of included property
(determined as of the date of distribution) and the fair market
value of the account on the 6-month date. The result would be the
same if the assets were held in an IRA or similar trust, such as a
Roth IRA, 403(b) plan, or 401(k) plan.
Example 12. Husband died with a retirement account, having named
his three children, in specified shares totaling 100%, as the
designated beneficiaries of that account. During the alternate
valuation period, the account was divided into three separate
retirement accounts, each in the name of a different child and
funded with that child's designated share. The division of the
retirement account is not a transaction described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i) of this section by reason of paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, so the alternate valuation date for each of the new
accounts is the 6-month date.
Example 13. (i) D's gross estate includes real property. During
the alternate valuation period, D's executor grants a conservation
easement that restricts the property's use under local law but does
not satisfy the requirements of section 2031(c). The easement
reduces the fair market value of the property. The executor's grant
of the conservation easement is a transaction described in paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section and does not satisfy the exception
described in paragraph (c)(4) of this section. Therefore, the
alternate valuation date for the property is the date the easement
was granted, and the value to be included in D's gross estate is the
fair market value of the property immediately prior to the grant.
(ii) Assume, instead, that the easement satisfied the
requirements of section 2031(c) and, thus, satisfied the exception
described in paragraph (c)(4) of this section. Pursuant to paragraph
(c)(4), for purposes of determining both the estate's eligibility to
make an election under section 2032 and the value of the property on
the 6-month date, the section 2031(c) qualified easement is taken
into account in determining both the fair market value of the
property on D's date of death and the fair market value of the
property on the 6-month date.
* * * * *
(e) Examples. -The application of paragraph (d) of this section
regarding ``included property'' and ``excluded property'' is
illustrated by the following examples.
[[Page 71497]]
Example 1. Assume that the decedent (D) died on January 1, 1955:
* * *
Example 2. (i) At death, D held a qualified interest described
in section 2702(b) in the form of an annuity in a grantor retained
annuity trust (GRAT) D had created and funded with $150,000. The
trust agreement provides for an annual annuity payment of $12,000
per year to D or D's estate for a term of 10 years. At the
expiration of the 10-year term, the remainder is to be distributed
to D's child. D dies prior to the expiration of the 10-year term. On
D's date of death, the fair market value of the property in the GRAT
is $325,000.
(ii) The only assets in the GRAT are an apartment building and a
bank account. Three months after D's date of death, an annuity
payment of $12,000 is paid in cash to D's estate. The monthly rents
from the apartment building total $500. After the date of death and
prior to the payment date, the GRAT received $1,500 in excluded
property in the form of rent. Pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A)
of this section, $1,500 of the $12,000 distributed is deemed to be
excluded property for purposes of section 2032. The distribution is
a transaction described in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(I)(4) of this
section. On the date of the distribution, the fair market value of
D's interest in the GRAT before the distribution equals the sum of
the distribution paid to D's estate and the fair market value of D's
interest in the GRAT immediately after the distribution. Thus,
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) of this section, the alternate
valuation date for the $10,500 cash distribution, which is included
property, is the date of its distribution, and the alternate
valuation date of the GRAT is the 6-month date.
(iii) The calculation of the value of D's interest in the GRAT
includible in D's gross estate at D's death pursuant to section 2036
must be computed under the special rule of paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B)
of this section as a result of the estate's election to use the
alternate valuation method under section 2032. On the 6-month date,
the section 7520 interest rate is 6% and the fair market value of
the property in the GRAT is $289,500. Pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(B) of this section, the fair market value of the GRAT
property deemed to be included property is $300,000 ($289,500 plus
$10,500). Accordingly, for purposes of determining the fair market
value of the corpus includible in D's gross estate under section
2036(a)(1) as of the 6-month date, see Sec. 20.2036-1(c)(2), using
a GRAT corpus of $300,000 and, pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)(i) of
this section, a section 7520 rate of 6%.
(f) Post-death factors and occurrences.--(1) In general. The
election to use the alternate valuation method under section 2032
permits property includible in the gross estate on the decedent's date
of death to be valued on the 6-month date, rather than on the date of
death. Thus, the election permits a valuation for Federal estate tax
purposes that reflects the impact of factors such as economic or market
conditions, occurrences described in section 2054 (to the extent not
compensated by insurance or otherwise, and not deducted under that
section), and other factors or occurrences during the alternate
valuation period, as set forth in guidance issued by the Secretary.
Those factors and occurrences do not include the mere lapse of time
described in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, or transactions
described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) or (c)(2) of this section that are not
excluded under paragraphs (c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii)(A), and (c)(4) of
this section. Generally, management decisions made in the ordinary
course of operating a business, such as a corporation, a partnership,
or other business entity, are taken into account under this section as
occurrences related to economic or market conditions. To the extent,
however, that these decisions change the ownership or control structure
of the business entity, or otherwise are included in paragraph
(c)(1)(i) or (c)(2) of this section and are not excluded by paragraphs
(c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii)(A), or (c)(4) of this section, they will be
treated as described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
(2) Mere lapse of time. * * * The application of this paragraph is
illustrated in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of this section:
(i) Life estates, remainders, and similar interests. (A) The fair
market value of a life estate, remainder, term interest or similar
interest as of the alternate valuation date is determined by applying
the methodology prescribed in Sec. 20.2031-7, subject to the following
two sentences. The age of each person whose life expectancy may affect
the fair market value of the interest shall be determined as of the
date of the decedent's death. The fair market value of the property and
the applicable interest rate under section 7520 shall be determined
using values applicable on the alternate valuation date.
(B) Examples. The application of paragraph (f)(2)(i)(A) of this
section is illustrated in the following examples.
Example 1. Assume that the decedent (D) or D's estate was
entitled to receive certain property upon the death of A, who was
entitled to the income from the property for life. At the time of
D's death after April 30, 2009, the fair market value of the
property was $50,000, and A was 47 years and 5 months old. In the
month in which D died, the section 7520 rate was 6.2%, but rose to
7.4% on the 6-month date. The fair market value of D's remainder
interest as of D's date of death was $9,336.00 ($50,000 x 0.18672,
the single life remainder factor from Table S for a 47 year old at a
6.2% interest rate), as illustrated in Example 1 of Sec. 20.2031-
7T(d)(5). If, because of economic conditions, the property declined
in value during the alternate valuation period and was worth only
$40,000 on the 6-month date, the fair market value of the remainder
interest would be $5,827 ($40,000 X 0.14568, the Table S value for a
47 year old at a 7.4% interest rate), even though A would have been
48 years old on the 6-month date.
Example 2. D created an intervivos charitable remainder annuity
trust (CRAT) described in section 664(d)(1). The trust instrument
directs the trustee to hold, invest, and reinvest the corpus of the
trust and to pay to D for D's life, and then to D's child (C) for
C's life, an amount each year equal to 6% of the initial fair market
value of the trust. At the termination of the trust, the corpus,
together with the accumulated income, is to be distributed to N, a
charitable organization described in sections 170(c), 2055(a), and
2522(a). D died, survived by C. D's estate is entitled to a
charitable deduction under section 2055 for the present value of N's
remainder interest in the CRAT. Pursuant to Sec. 1.664-2(c) and
Sec. 20.7520-2, in determining the fair market value of the
remainder interest as of the alternate valuation date, D's executor
may elect to use the section 7520 rate in effect for either of the
two months immediately preceding the month in which the alternate
valuation date occurs. Regardless of the section 7520 rate selected,
however, the factor to be used to value the remainder interest is
the appropriate factor for C's age on the date of D's death.
(2)(ii) Patents. * * * Six months after the date of the decedent's
death, the patent was sold for its then fair market value that had
decreased to $60,000 because of the lapse of time. * * *
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
this paragraph (f). In each example, decedent's (D's) estate elects to
value D's gross estate under the alternate valuation method, so that
the alternate valuation date of the property includible in the gross
estate on D's date of death is either the transaction date or the 6-
month date. In each example, assume that the only factors affecting
value, and the only occurrences described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) or
(c)(2) of this section, taking place during the alternate valuation
period are those described in the example.
Example 1. At D's death, D's gross estate includes a residence.
During the alternate valuation period, the fair market value of the
residence (as well as the residential market in the area generally)
declines due to a reduction in the availability of credit throughout
the United States and, consequently, a decline in the availability
of mortgages. The decline in the availability of mortgages is an
economic or market condition. Therefore, in valuing the residence on
the 6-month date, the effect of this decline on the fair market
value of the residence is to be taken into account.
Example 2. (i) At D's death, D is the sole shareholder of
corporation Y, a manufacturing company. Four months after
[[Page 71498]]
D's death, Y's physical plant is destroyed as a result of a natural
disaster. The disaster affects a large geographic area and, as a
result, the economy of that area is negatively affected. Five months
after D's death, Y's Board of Directors votes to liquidate and
dissolve Y. The liquidation and dissolution proceeding is not
completed as of the 6-month date. The natural disaster is a factor
that affects economic and market conditions. Therefore, the
disaster, to the extent not compensated by insurance or otherwise,
is taken into account in valuing the Y stock on the 6-month date.
(ii) Assume instead that Y's plant is severely damaged due to
flooding from the failure of pipes in the facility. The damage is an
occurrence described in section 2054. Therefore, the damage, to the
extent not compensated by insurance or otherwise, is taken into
account in valuing the property on the 6-month date.
Example 3. At D's death, D has an interest in an S corporation,
W. During the alternate valuation period, it is discovered that an
employee of W has embezzled significant assets from W. W does not
reasonably expect to recover the funds or any damages from the
employee, and insurance proceeds are not sufficient to cover the
loss. The theft is an occurrence described in section 2054.
Therefore, the theft, to the extent not compensated by insurance or
otherwise, is taken into account in valuing D's interest in W on the
6-month date.
(h) Effective/applicability date. * * * All of paragraph (c)(2) of
this section except the second sentence of the introductory text, all
of paragraph (c)(3) of this section except paragraph (c)(3)(i)(C) of
this section, the chart in Example 1 of paragraph (e) of this section,
all of paragraph (f)(2) of this section except the last sentence, and
the first and third sentences in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section
are applicable to decedents dying after August 16, 1954. All of
paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1), (a)(2), (c)(1)(i),
(c)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv), (c)(3)(i)(C), (c)(4), (c)(5),
(f)(1), (f)(2)(i), and (f)(3) of this section, the second sentence of
the introductory text in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, all of
paragraph (e) of this section except the chart in Example 1, the last
sentence in the introductory text of paragraph (f)(2) of this section,
and the second sentence in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section are
applicable to estates of decedents dying on or after the date of
publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final in
the Federal Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-29921 Filed 11-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P