Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Extension of Department of Defense Mentor-Protégé Pilot Program (DFARS Case 2011-D050), 71467-71468 [2011-29897]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 216
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Government procurement.
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
48 CFR Part 219 and Appendix I to
Chapter 2
PART 216—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
Indefinite-quantity contracts.
(c)(1)(ii)(D) Limitation on singleaward contracts.
(i) The authority to make the
determination authorized in FAR
16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(1) shall not be
delegated below the level of the senior
procurement executive.
(ii) The head of the agency must
notify the congressional defense
committees within 30 days after making
any determination under FAR
16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(1). If the award
concerns intelligence or intelligencerelated activities of DoD, notification
shall also be provided to the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate
and Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of
Representatives. (See sample
notification at PGI
216.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(iv).)
(iii) A copy of each determination
made in accordance with FAR
16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D) and each
congressional notice shall be submitted
in accordance with PGI
216.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(iii).
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement to
extend the date for submittal of
applications under the DoD Mentor´ ´
Protege Pilot Program for new mentor´ ´
protege agreements and the date
mentors may incur costs and/or receive
credit towards fulfilling their small
business subcontracting goals through
´ ´
an approved mentor-protege agreement.
DATES: Effective Date: November 18,
2011.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
RIN 0750–AH44
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Extension of
´ ´
Department of Defense Mentor-Protege
Pilot Program (DFARS Case 2011–
D050)
SUMMARY:
2. Revise section 216.504 to read as
follows:
■
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 216 continues to read as follows:
■
[FR Doc. 2011–29903 Filed 11–17–11; 8:45 am]
merely extends the effective dates for an
existing DoD program. These dates have
already been extended by law.
AGENCY:
Therefore, the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System confirms as final the
interim rule published at 75 FR 40716
on July 13, 2010, with the following
changes:
216.504
71467
Ms.
Lee Renna, telephone 703–602–0764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
This Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) case
implements section 8016 of the National
Defense Appropriations Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 (Pub. L. 112–10).
The NDAA for FY 2011 was signed into
law on April 15, 2011. Section 8016
´ ´
amends the DoD Mentor-Protege Pilot
Program (DoD MPP), section 831 of
Public Law 110–510 (10 U.S.C. 2302,
note), by changing the—
• Acceptance date for new DoD MPP
agreements from September 30, 2010, to
September 30, 2011; and
• Eligibility date DoD mentors may
incur costs for the purposes of receiving
cost reimbursement or credit toward
attainment of subcontracting goals, from
September 30, 2013, to September 30,
2014.
This final rule implements these
changes in the corresponding DFARS
regulations: 219.704(b) and (d); and
I–103(a) and (b).
DoD is issuing a final rule because
this rule does not have a significant
effect beyond the internal operating
procedures of DoD and does not have a
significant cost or administrative impact
on contractors or offerors. This final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule because this final
rule does not constitute a significant
DFARS revision within the meaning of
FAR 1.501–1 and 41 U.S.C. 1707 and
does not require publication for public
comment.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219 and
Appendix I to Chapter 2
Government procurement.
Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 219 and 48
CFR chapter 2 appendix I are amended
as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 219 and Appendix I continue to
read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 219—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
219.7104
[Amended]
2. Section 219.7104 is amended—
(a) In paragraph (b), by removing the
year ‘‘2013’’ and adding in its place
‘‘2014’’; and
■
■
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
71468
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 223 / Friday, November 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Accounting Service modified DoD’s
largest system, the Mechanization of
Contract Administration Services
(MOCAS) system. MOCAS processes
approximately 57 percent of the dollars
paid through DFAS. The upgrades to
MOCAS were completed on June 1,
2011. Over the course of the next year,
subsequent legacy entitlement and
payment system upgrades are scheduled
for completion and deployment.
Two respondents submitted public
comments. DoD reviewed the comments
in the development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments is provided
as follows.
(b) In paragraph (d), by removing the
year ‘‘2013’’ and adding in its place
‘‘2014’’.
■
APPENDIX I—POLICY AND
PROCEDURES FOR THE DOD PILOT
´ ´
MENTOR-PROTEGE PROGRAM
3. Section I–103 is amended—
(a) In paragraph (a) by removing the
year ‘‘2010’’ and adding in its place
‘‘2011’’; and
■ (b) In paragraph (b) introductory text
by removing the year ‘‘2013’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘2014’’.
■
■
[FR Doc. 2011–29897 Filed 11–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
II. Discussion and Analysis of the
Public Comments
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 232
RIN 0750–AH19
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Accelerate
Small Business Payments (DFARS
Case 2011–D008)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is adopting as final,
without change, an interim rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement to
accelerate payments to all small
business concerns.
DATES: Effective Date: November 18,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lee Renna, telephone 703–602–0764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD published an interim rule in the
Federal Register at 76 FR 23505 on
April 27, 2011, amending the Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to provide
accelerated payments for all small
business concerns. The rule removes the
term ‘‘disadvantaged’’ from the language
at DFARS 232.903 and DFARS
232.906(a)(ii), thereby extending the
accelerated payment policy uniformly to
all small business concerns.
In combination with the change to the
regulations, DoD immediately began a
phased implementation to update the
entitlement and payment systems so
that they could accommodate
accelerated payments. During the initial
phase, the Defense Finance and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Nov 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
Comment: The first respondent
commented that the rule would ensure
their company had adequate cash flow
to promptly pay its vendors.
Response: This positive endorsement
of the rule is noted.
Comment: The second respondent
stated that the wording of the rule is
ambiguous. Rather than stating it is DoD
policy to pay small business concerns
‘‘* * * as soon as possible * * *’’, the
respondent recommended that the rule
should specify the number of days for
processing payments to small business.
Response: The authority for DoD’s
payment policy is the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB’s)
Prompt Payment Regulations at part
1315 of title 5 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The phrase ‘‘* * * as
quickly as possible * * *’’ was taken
verbatim from those regulations.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
U.S.C. 601, et seq., and is summarized
as follows:
This final rule adopts as final, without
change, the interim rule that revised
DFARS 232.903 and 232.906(a)(ii) to
allow accelerated payment processes for
all small business concerns. The
objective of the rule is to pay small
businesses as quickly as possible.
There were no significant issues
raised by the public in response to the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
There were no comments filed by the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration in response to
the rule.
Analysis of the Federal Procurement
Data System indicates that
approximately 60,000 small businesses
had active contracts in Fiscal Year 2010.
It is reasonable to assume a similar
number of small businesses will be
positively affected by the use of
accelerated payment procedures.
This final rule imposes no new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on the small business community.
DoD expects this rule to have a
significant positive economic impact on
all small entities within the meaning of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601, et seq., because it extends
accelerated payments to all small
business concerns. There were no
significant alternatives identified that
would meet the objectives of the rule.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Burden Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
[FR Doc. 2011–29859 Filed 11–17–11; 8:45 am]
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) has been prepared consistent
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 232
Government procurement.
Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without
Change
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 48 CFR part 232, which was
published at 76 FR 23505 on April 27,
2011, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 223 (Friday, November 18, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71467-71468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29897]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 219 and Appendix I to Chapter 2
RIN 0750-AH44
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Extension of
Department of Defense Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Pilot Program (DFARS
Case 2011-D050)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement to extend the date for submittal of
applications under the DoD Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Pilot Program
for new mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreements and the date mentors
may incur costs and/or receive credit towards fulfilling their small
business subcontracting goals through an approved mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreement.
DATES: Effective Date: November 18, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lee Renna, telephone 703-602-0764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) case
implements section 8016 of the National Defense Appropriations Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 (Pub. L. 112-10). The NDAA for FY 2011
was signed into law on April 15, 2011. Section 8016 amends the DoD
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Pilot Program (DoD MPP), section 831 of
Public Law 110-510 (10 U.S.C. 2302, note), by changing the--
Acceptance date for new DoD MPP agreements from September
30, 2010, to September 30, 2011; and
Eligibility date DoD mentors may incur costs for the
purposes of receiving cost reimbursement or credit toward attainment of
subcontracting goals, from September 30, 2013, to September 30, 2014.
This final rule implements these changes in the corresponding DFARS
regulations: 219.704(b) and (d); and I-103(a) and (b).
DoD is issuing a final rule because this rule does not have a
significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD and
does not have a significant cost or administrative impact on
contractors or offerors. This final rule merely extends the effective
dates for an existing DoD program. These dates have already been
extended by law.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because
this final rule does not constitute a significant DFARS revision within
the meaning of FAR 1.501-1 and 41 U.S.C. 1707 and does not require
publication for public comment.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219 and Appendix I to Chapter 2
Government procurement.
Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 219 and 48 CFR chapter 2 appendix I are
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 219 and Appendix I continue
to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 219--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
219.7104 [Amended]
0
2. Section 219.7104 is amended--
0
(a) In paragraph (b), by removing the year ``2013'' and adding in its
place ``2014''; and
[[Page 71468]]
0
(b) In paragraph (d), by removing the year ``2013'' and adding in its
place ``2014''.
APPENDIX I--POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR THE DOD PILOT MENTOR-
PROT[Eacute]G[Eacute] PROGRAM
0
3. Section I-103 is amended--
0
(a) In paragraph (a) by removing the year ``2010'' and adding in its
place ``2011''; and
0
(b) In paragraph (b) introductory text by removing the year ``2013''
and adding in its place ``2014''.
[FR Doc. 2011-29897 Filed 11-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P