Privacy Act; Implementation, 71293-71294 [2011-29384]
Download as PDF
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
or performed in relation to an energy
performance contract) conducted on the
same property, if the previous audit was
completed within 2 years of the time of
a required PNA or energy audit, and if
the previous audit meets the data
requirements of the audits prescribed by
this section.
(xii) While the timing of an energy
audit is coordinated with a PNA, there
are several instances when HUD may
require a current or updated energy
audit. These include but are not limited
to:
(A) When requesting HUD permission
to transfer excess cash from one project
to another;
(B) At the direction of HUD, when
HUD energy consumption data or
industry benchmarks indicate that a
project’s energy consumption levels are
excessive when compared to similar
projects within the project’s climatic
zone;
(C) When required to substantiate an
exception to the Total Development
Cost Limit in reference to 24 CFR
941.306; and
(D) When the PHA is substandard
under any applicable performance
rating system used by HUD to assess
project-level performance both in terms
of operations and financial condition.
(xiii) The energy auditor shall be
experienced in the performance of
residential building energy audits and
shall hold a current, valid certification
from a state energy audit certifying
agency for the state where the property
is located or a nationally recognized
energy audit certification provider, or
hold other certification acceptable to
HUD or expressed in HUD guidance.
(15) Green measures. (i) Green
measures are products, systems or
processes that do not necessarily
conserve energy, but result in other
environmental benefits. These include,
for example: use of low volatility or
nonvolatile organic compound cabinets,
flooring, paints, or sealants; physical
changes required to effectively
implement integrated pest management;
and hazardous waste or construction
debris removal processes.
(ii) An energy audit shall identify
green measures if the PHA directs the
energy auditor to include them in the
energy audit, but they are not required
to be included. Where an energy audit
includes green measures, it shall
identify the projected cost of the green
measure, and where a standard building
component is available, it shall identify
the projected cost for the standard
component and the incremental cost of
the green measure.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Nov 16, 2011
Jkt 226001
Dated: October 21, 2011.
Sandra B. Henriquez,
Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing.
[FR Doc. 2011–29640 Filed 11–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 1
RIN 1505–AC37
Privacy Act; Implementation
Office of the Secretary,
Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974,
as amended, the Department of the
Treasury (Treasury) amends this part to
partially exempt a new Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) system of records entitled
‘‘Treasury/IRS 37.111—Preparer Tax
Identification Number Records’’ from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than December 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments to
David R. Williams, Director, Return
Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20224. Phone:
(202) 927–6428 (not a toll-free number).
Comments will be made available for
inspection at the IRS Freedom of
Information Reading Room (Room
1621), at the above address. The
telephone number for the Reading Room
is (202) 622–5164 (not a toll-free
number). You may also submit
comments through the Federal
rulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (follow the
instructions for submitting comments).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David R. Williams, Director, Return
Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an agency
may promulgate rules to exempt a
system of records from certain
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system
is investigatory material compiled for
law enforcement purposes. Treasury is
hereby giving notice of a proposed rule
to exempt ‘‘Treasury/IRS 37.111—
Preparer Tax Identification Number
Records’’ from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act of 1974, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The proposed
exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2) is from provisions (c)(3),
(d)(1)–(4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G)–(I), and (f)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71293
because the system contains
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes. The following
are the reasons why this system of
records maintained by the IRS is exempt
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the
Privacy Act of 1974:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). These
provisions of the Privacy Act provide
for the release of the disclosure
accounting required by 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual
named in the record at his/her request.
The reasons for exempting this system
of records from the foregoing provisions
are:
(i) The release of disclosure
accounting would put the subject of an
investigation on notice that an
investigation exists and that such
person is the subject of that
investigation.
(ii) Such release would provide the
subject of an investigation with an
accurate accounting of the date, nature,
and purpose of each disclosure and the
name and address of the person or
agency to which disclosure was made.
The release of such information to the
subject of an investigation would
provide the subject with significant
information concerning the nature of the
investigation and could result in the
alteration or destruction of documentary
evidence, the improper influencing of
witnesses, and other activities that
could impede or compromise the
investigation.
(iii) Release to the individual of the
disclosure accounting would alert the
individual as to which agencies were
investigating the subject and the scope
of the investigation and could aid the
individual in impeding or
compromising investigations by those
agencies.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1)–(4), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), and (f). These provisions of the
Privacy Act relate to an individual’s
right to be notified of:
(i) The existence of records pertaining
to such individual,
(ii) Requirements for identifying an
individual who requested access to
records,
(iii) The agency procedures relating to
access to and amendment of records,
(iv) The content of the information
contained in such records, and
(v) The civil remedies available to the
individual in the event of an adverse
determination by an agency concerning
access to or amendment of information
contained in record systems.
The reasons for exempting this system
of records from the foregoing provisions
are that notifying an individual (at the
individual’s request) of the existence of
an investigative file pertaining to such
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
71294
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules
individual or to granting access to an
investigative file pertaining to such
individual could:
(i) Interfere with investigative and
enforcement proceedings,
(ii) Deprive codefendants of a right to
a fair trial or an impartial adjudication,
(iii) Constitute an unwarranted
invasion of the personal privacy of
others,
(iv) Disclose the identity of
confidential sources and reveal
confidential information supplied by
such sources,
(v) Disclose investigative techniques
and procedures.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision
of the Privacy Act requires each agency
to maintain in its records only such
information about an individual as is
relevant and necessary to accomplish a
purpose of the agency required to be
accomplished by statute or executive
order. The reasons for exempting this
system of records from the foregoing are
as follows:
(i) The IRS will limit the system to
those records that are needed for
compliance with the provisions of Title
26, 31 U.S.C. 330, and regulations
applicable to paid tax return preparers.
However, an exemption from the
foregoing is needed because,
particularly in the early stages of an
investigation, it is not possible to
determine the relevance or necessity of
specific information.
(ii) Relevance and necessity are
questions of judgment and timing. What
appears relevant and necessary when
first received may subsequently be
determined to be irrelevant or
unnecessary. It is only after the
information is evaluated that the
relevance and necessity of such
information can be established with
certainty.
(5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This
provision of the Privacy Act requires the
publication of the categories of sources
of records in each system of records.
The reasons an exemption from this
provision has been claimed, are as
follows:
(i) Revealing categories of sources of
information could disclose investigative
techniques and procedures.
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of
information could cause sources who
supply information to investigators to
refrain from giving such information
because of fear of reprisal, or fear of
breach of promises of anonymity and
confidentiality.
Treasury will publish the notice of the
proposed new system of records
separately in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, it
has been determined that this proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:57 Nov 16, 2011
Jkt 226001
rule is not a significant regulatory
action, and therefore, does not require a
regulatory impact analysis. Because no
notice of proposed rulemaking is
required, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, do not apply.
The regulation will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this proposed rule does
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, it is hereby certified that these
regulations will not significantly affect a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule imposes no duties or
obligations on small entities.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1
Privacy.
Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 1—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 1
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as
amended. Subpart C also issued under 5
U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is
amended by adding the following text to
the table in numerical order.
§ 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part
from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this
part.
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) * * *
Number
Name of system
*
*
IRS 37.111 .......
*
*
*
Preparer Tax Identification
Number Records.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 24, 2011.
Melissa Hartman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy,
Transparency, and Records.
[FR Doc. 2011–29384 Filed 11–16–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 158 and 161
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0427; FRL–8886–1]
RIN 2070–AJ26
Prions; Proposed Amendment To
Clarify Product Performance Data for
Products With Prion-Related Claims
and Availability of Draft Test
Guidelines
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Supplemental proposed rule.
AGENCY:
As a supplement to the
proposed rule to declare a prion (i.e.,
proteinaceous infectious particle) a
‘‘pest’’ under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), and to amend its regulations to
expressly include prion within the
regulatory definition of pest, EPA is
now proposing to amend its product
performance data requirements to
clarify that efficacy data are required for
all products with prion-related claims.
The existing product performance data
requirements already require efficacy
data to be submitted when the
‘‘pesticide product bears a claim to
control pest microorganisms that pose a
threat to human health and whose
presence cannot readily be observed by
the user including, but not limited to,
microorganisms infectious to man in
any area of the inanimate environment.
* * *’’ Since this general requirement
applies to products with prion-related
claims, EPA is proposing to amend the
regulation to specifically identify that
efficacy data are required for products
with prion-related claims. In addition,
EPA is announcing the availability for
public review and comment of draft test
guidelines concerning the generation of
product performance data for prionrelated products.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 17, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0427, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71293-71294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29384]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 1
RIN 1505-AC37
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) amends this
part to partially exempt a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) system of
records entitled ``Treasury/IRS 37.111--Preparer Tax Identification
Number Records'' from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than December 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments to David R. Williams, Director,
Return Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20224. Phone: (202) 927-6428 (not a toll-free number). Comments will be
made available for inspection at the IRS Freedom of Information Reading
Room (Room 1621), at the above address. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is (202) 622-5164 (not a toll-free number). You may also
submit comments through the Federal rulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov (follow the instructions for submitting comments).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Williams, Director, Return
Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an
agency may promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system is investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes. Treasury is hereby giving notice
of a proposed rule to exempt ``Treasury/IRS 37.111--Preparer Tax
Identification Number Records'' from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act of 1974, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The proposed exemption
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) is from provisions (c)(3), (d)(1)-(4),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G)-(I), and (f) because the system contains
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. The
following are the reasons why this system of records maintained by the
IRS is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act of
1974:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). These provisions of the Privacy Act
provide for the release of the disclosure accounting required by 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual named in the record at his/
her request. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the
foregoing provisions are:
(i) The release of disclosure accounting would put the subject of
an investigation on notice that an investigation exists and that such
person is the subject of that investigation.
(ii) Such release would provide the subject of an investigation
with an accurate accounting of the date, nature, and purpose of each
disclosure and the name and address of the person or agency to which
disclosure was made. The release of such information to the subject of
an investigation would provide the subject with significant information
concerning the nature of the investigation and could result in the
alteration or destruction of documentary evidence, the improper
influencing of witnesses, and other activities that could impede or
compromise the investigation.
(iii) Release to the individual of the disclosure accounting would
alert the individual as to which agencies were investigating the
subject and the scope of the investigation and could aid the individual
in impeding or compromising investigations by those agencies.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1)-(4), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (f). These
provisions of the Privacy Act relate to an individual's right to be
notified of:
(i) The existence of records pertaining to such individual,
(ii) Requirements for identifying an individual who requested
access to records,
(iii) The agency procedures relating to access to and amendment of
records,
(iv) The content of the information contained in such records, and
(v) The civil remedies available to the individual in the event of
an adverse determination by an agency concerning access to or amendment
of information contained in record systems.
The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing
provisions are that notifying an individual (at the individual's
request) of the existence of an investigative file pertaining to such
[[Page 71294]]
individual or to granting access to an investigative file pertaining to
such individual could:
(i) Interfere with investigative and enforcement proceedings,
(ii) Deprive codefendants of a right to a fair trial or an
impartial adjudication,
(iii) Constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of
others,
(iv) Disclose the identity of confidential sources and reveal
confidential information supplied by such sources,
(v) Disclose investigative techniques and procedures.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision of the Privacy Act requires
each agency to maintain in its records only such information about an
individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the
agency required to be accomplished by statute or executive order. The
reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing are as
follows:
(i) The IRS will limit the system to those records that are needed
for compliance with the provisions of Title 26, 31 U.S.C. 330, and
regulations applicable to paid tax return preparers. However, an
exemption from the foregoing is needed because, particularly in the
early stages of an investigation, it is not possible to determine the
relevance or necessity of specific information.
(ii) Relevance and necessity are questions of judgment and timing.
What appears relevant and necessary when first received may
subsequently be determined to be irrelevant or unnecessary. It is only
after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of
such information can be established with certainty.
(5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This provision of the Privacy Act
requires the publication of the categories of sources of records in
each system of records. The reasons an exemption from this provision
has been claimed, are as follows:
(i) Revealing categories of sources of information could disclose
investigative techniques and procedures.
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of information could cause
sources who supply information to investigators to refrain from giving
such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of
promises of anonymity and confidentiality.
Treasury will publish the notice of the proposed new system of
records separately in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, it has been determined that this
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore,
does not require a regulatory impact analysis. Because no notice of
proposed rulemaking is required, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, do not apply.
The regulation will not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this
proposed rule does not have federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby certified that these regulations will not
significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The
proposed rule imposes no duties or obligations on small entities.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1
Privacy.
Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 1--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. Subpart A also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. Subpart C also issued under 5
U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is amended by adding the
following text to the table in numerical order.
Sec. 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part from provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a and this part.
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Name of system
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
IRS 37.111............................ Preparer Tax Identification
Number Records.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: October 24, 2011.
Melissa Hartman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and Records.
[FR Doc. 2011-29384 Filed 11-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P