Privacy Act; Implementation, 71293-71294 [2011-29384]

Download as PDF pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules or performed in relation to an energy performance contract) conducted on the same property, if the previous audit was completed within 2 years of the time of a required PNA or energy audit, and if the previous audit meets the data requirements of the audits prescribed by this section. (xii) While the timing of an energy audit is coordinated with a PNA, there are several instances when HUD may require a current or updated energy audit. These include but are not limited to: (A) When requesting HUD permission to transfer excess cash from one project to another; (B) At the direction of HUD, when HUD energy consumption data or industry benchmarks indicate that a project’s energy consumption levels are excessive when compared to similar projects within the project’s climatic zone; (C) When required to substantiate an exception to the Total Development Cost Limit in reference to 24 CFR 941.306; and (D) When the PHA is substandard under any applicable performance rating system used by HUD to assess project-level performance both in terms of operations and financial condition. (xiii) The energy auditor shall be experienced in the performance of residential building energy audits and shall hold a current, valid certification from a state energy audit certifying agency for the state where the property is located or a nationally recognized energy audit certification provider, or hold other certification acceptable to HUD or expressed in HUD guidance. (15) Green measures. (i) Green measures are products, systems or processes that do not necessarily conserve energy, but result in other environmental benefits. These include, for example: use of low volatility or nonvolatile organic compound cabinets, flooring, paints, or sealants; physical changes required to effectively implement integrated pest management; and hazardous waste or construction debris removal processes. (ii) An energy audit shall identify green measures if the PHA directs the energy auditor to include them in the energy audit, but they are not required to be included. Where an energy audit includes green measures, it shall identify the projected cost of the green measure, and where a standard building component is available, it shall identify the projected cost for the standard component and the incremental cost of the green measure. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:57 Nov 16, 2011 Jkt 226001 Dated: October 21, 2011. Sandra B. Henriquez, Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing. [FR Doc. 2011–29640 Filed 11–16–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of the Secretary 31 CFR Part 1 RIN 1505–AC37 Privacy Act; Implementation Office of the Secretary, Treasury. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) amends this part to partially exempt a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) system of records entitled ‘‘Treasury/IRS 37.111—Preparer Tax Identification Number Records’’ from certain provisions of the Privacy Act. DATES: Comments must be received no later than December 19, 2011. ADDRESSES: Please submit comments to David R. Williams, Director, Return Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20224. Phone: (202) 927–6428 (not a toll-free number). Comments will be made available for inspection at the IRS Freedom of Information Reading Room (Room 1621), at the above address. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 622–5164 (not a toll-free number). You may also submit comments through the Federal rulemaking portal at https:// www.regulations.gov (follow the instructions for submitting comments). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Williams, Director, Return Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20224. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an agency may promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system is investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. Treasury is hereby giving notice of a proposed rule to exempt ‘‘Treasury/IRS 37.111— Preparer Tax Identification Number Records’’ from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The proposed exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) is from provisions (c)(3), (d)(1)–(4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G)–(I), and (f) SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 71293 because the system contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. The following are the reasons why this system of records maintained by the IRS is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act of 1974: (1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). These provisions of the Privacy Act provide for the release of the disclosure accounting required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual named in the record at his/her request. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing provisions are: (i) The release of disclosure accounting would put the subject of an investigation on notice that an investigation exists and that such person is the subject of that investigation. (ii) Such release would provide the subject of an investigation with an accurate accounting of the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure and the name and address of the person or agency to which disclosure was made. The release of such information to the subject of an investigation would provide the subject with significant information concerning the nature of the investigation and could result in the alteration or destruction of documentary evidence, the improper influencing of witnesses, and other activities that could impede or compromise the investigation. (iii) Release to the individual of the disclosure accounting would alert the individual as to which agencies were investigating the subject and the scope of the investigation and could aid the individual in impeding or compromising investigations by those agencies. (2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1)–(4), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (f). These provisions of the Privacy Act relate to an individual’s right to be notified of: (i) The existence of records pertaining to such individual, (ii) Requirements for identifying an individual who requested access to records, (iii) The agency procedures relating to access to and amendment of records, (iv) The content of the information contained in such records, and (v) The civil remedies available to the individual in the event of an adverse determination by an agency concerning access to or amendment of information contained in record systems. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing provisions are that notifying an individual (at the individual’s request) of the existence of an investigative file pertaining to such E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 71294 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules individual or to granting access to an investigative file pertaining to such individual could: (i) Interfere with investigative and enforcement proceedings, (ii) Deprive codefendants of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, (iii) Constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of others, (iv) Disclose the identity of confidential sources and reveal confidential information supplied by such sources, (v) Disclose investigative techniques and procedures. (3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision of the Privacy Act requires each agency to maintain in its records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required to be accomplished by statute or executive order. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing are as follows: (i) The IRS will limit the system to those records that are needed for compliance with the provisions of Title 26, 31 U.S.C. 330, and regulations applicable to paid tax return preparers. However, an exemption from the foregoing is needed because, particularly in the early stages of an investigation, it is not possible to determine the relevance or necessity of specific information. (ii) Relevance and necessity are questions of judgment and timing. What appears relevant and necessary when first received may subsequently be determined to be irrelevant or unnecessary. It is only after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of such information can be established with certainty. (5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This provision of the Privacy Act requires the publication of the categories of sources of records in each system of records. The reasons an exemption from this provision has been claimed, are as follows: (i) Revealing categories of sources of information could disclose investigative techniques and procedures. (ii) Revealing categories of sources of information could cause sources who supply information to investigators to refrain from giving such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of promises of anonymity and confidentiality. Treasury will publish the notice of the proposed new system of records separately in the Federal Register. Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, it has been determined that this proposed VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:57 Nov 16, 2011 Jkt 226001 rule is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, does not require a regulatory impact analysis. Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601– 612, do not apply. The regulation will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this proposed rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601– 612, it is hereby certified that these regulations will not significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The proposed rule imposes no duties or obligations on small entities. List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1 Privacy. Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 1—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. Subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a. 2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is amended by adding the following text to the table in numerical order. § 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this part. (g) * * * (1) * * * (viii) * * * Number Name of system * * IRS 37.111 ....... * * * Preparer Tax Identification Number Records. * * * * * Dated: October 24, 2011. Melissa Hartman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and Records. [FR Doc. 2011–29384 Filed 11–16–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 158 and 161 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0427; FRL–8886–1] RIN 2070–AJ26 Prions; Proposed Amendment To Clarify Product Performance Data for Products With Prion-Related Claims and Availability of Draft Test Guidelines Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Supplemental proposed rule. AGENCY: As a supplement to the proposed rule to declare a prion (i.e., proteinaceous infectious particle) a ‘‘pest’’ under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and to amend its regulations to expressly include prion within the regulatory definition of pest, EPA is now proposing to amend its product performance data requirements to clarify that efficacy data are required for all products with prion-related claims. The existing product performance data requirements already require efficacy data to be submitted when the ‘‘pesticide product bears a claim to control pest microorganisms that pose a threat to human health and whose presence cannot readily be observed by the user including, but not limited to, microorganisms infectious to man in any area of the inanimate environment. * * *’’ Since this general requirement applies to products with prion-related claims, EPA is proposing to amend the regulation to specifically identify that efficacy data are required for products with prion-related claims. In addition, EPA is announcing the availability for public review and comment of draft test guidelines concerning the generation of product performance data for prionrelated products. DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 17, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0427, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM 17NOP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71293-71294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29384]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary

31 CFR Part 1

RIN 1505-AC37


Privacy Act; Implementation

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Treasury.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 
1974, as amended, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) amends this 
part to partially exempt a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) system of 
records entitled ``Treasury/IRS 37.111--Preparer Tax Identification 
Number Records'' from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than December 19, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Please submit comments to David R. Williams, Director, 
Return Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20224. Phone: (202) 927-6428 (not a toll-free number). Comments will be 
made available for inspection at the IRS Freedom of Information Reading 
Room (Room 1621), at the above address. The telephone number for the 
Reading Room is (202) 622-5164 (not a toll-free number). You may also 
submit comments through the Federal rulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov (follow the instructions for submitting comments).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Williams, Director, Return 
Preparer Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20224.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an 
agency may promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system is investigatory material 
compiled for law enforcement purposes. Treasury is hereby giving notice 
of a proposed rule to exempt ``Treasury/IRS 37.111--Preparer Tax 
Identification Number Records'' from certain provisions of the Privacy 
Act of 1974, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The proposed exemption 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) is from provisions (c)(3), (d)(1)-(4), 
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G)-(I), and (f) because the system contains 
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. The 
following are the reasons why this system of records maintained by the 
IRS is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act of 
1974:
    (1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). These provisions of the Privacy Act 
provide for the release of the disclosure accounting required by 5 
U.S.C. 552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual named in the record at his/
her request. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the 
foregoing provisions are:
    (i) The release of disclosure accounting would put the subject of 
an investigation on notice that an investigation exists and that such 
person is the subject of that investigation.
    (ii) Such release would provide the subject of an investigation 
with an accurate accounting of the date, nature, and purpose of each 
disclosure and the name and address of the person or agency to which 
disclosure was made. The release of such information to the subject of 
an investigation would provide the subject with significant information 
concerning the nature of the investigation and could result in the 
alteration or destruction of documentary evidence, the improper 
influencing of witnesses, and other activities that could impede or 
compromise the investigation.
    (iii) Release to the individual of the disclosure accounting would 
alert the individual as to which agencies were investigating the 
subject and the scope of the investigation and could aid the individual 
in impeding or compromising investigations by those agencies.
    (2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1)-(4), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (f). These 
provisions of the Privacy Act relate to an individual's right to be 
notified of:
    (i) The existence of records pertaining to such individual,
    (ii) Requirements for identifying an individual who requested 
access to records,
    (iii) The agency procedures relating to access to and amendment of 
records,
    (iv) The content of the information contained in such records, and
    (v) The civil remedies available to the individual in the event of 
an adverse determination by an agency concerning access to or amendment 
of information contained in record systems.
    The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing 
provisions are that notifying an individual (at the individual's 
request) of the existence of an investigative file pertaining to such

[[Page 71294]]

individual or to granting access to an investigative file pertaining to 
such individual could:
    (i) Interfere with investigative and enforcement proceedings,
    (ii) Deprive codefendants of a right to a fair trial or an 
impartial adjudication,
    (iii) Constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of 
others,
    (iv) Disclose the identity of confidential sources and reveal 
confidential information supplied by such sources,
    (v) Disclose investigative techniques and procedures.
    (3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision of the Privacy Act requires 
each agency to maintain in its records only such information about an 
individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the 
agency required to be accomplished by statute or executive order. The 
reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing are as 
follows:
    (i) The IRS will limit the system to those records that are needed 
for compliance with the provisions of Title 26, 31 U.S.C. 330, and 
regulations applicable to paid tax return preparers. However, an 
exemption from the foregoing is needed because, particularly in the 
early stages of an investigation, it is not possible to determine the 
relevance or necessity of specific information.
    (ii) Relevance and necessity are questions of judgment and timing. 
What appears relevant and necessary when first received may 
subsequently be determined to be irrelevant or unnecessary. It is only 
after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of 
such information can be established with certainty.
    (5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This provision of the Privacy Act 
requires the publication of the categories of sources of records in 
each system of records. The reasons an exemption from this provision 
has been claimed, are as follows:
    (i) Revealing categories of sources of information could disclose 
investigative techniques and procedures.
    (ii) Revealing categories of sources of information could cause 
sources who supply information to investigators to refrain from giving 
such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of 
promises of anonymity and confidentiality.
    Treasury will publish the notice of the proposed new system of 
records separately in the Federal Register.
    Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, it has been determined that this 
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore, 
does not require a regulatory impact analysis. Because no notice of 
proposed rulemaking is required, the provisions of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, do not apply.
    The regulation will not have a substantial direct effect on the 
States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this 
proposed rule does not have federalism implications under Executive 
Order 13132.
    Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby certified that these regulations will not 
significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The 
proposed rule imposes no duties or obligations on small entities.

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1

    Privacy.

    Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 1--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. Subpart A also 
issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. Subpart C also issued under 5 
U.S.C. 552a.

    2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(viii) is amended by adding the 
following text to the table in numerical order.


Sec.  1.36  Systems exempt in whole or in part from provisions of 5 
U.S.C. 552a and this part.

    (g) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (viii) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Number                           Name of system
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                * * * * *
IRS 37.111............................  Preparer Tax Identification
                                         Number Records.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

    Dated: October 24, 2011.
Melissa Hartman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and Records.
[FR Doc. 2011-29384 Filed 11-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.