Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines, 70953 [2011-29497]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules Arkansas’ Interstate Transport SIP to address pollution affecting visibility (76 FR 64186). In the proposal we requested comment by November 16, 2011. The proposal and supporting documentation for our proposal can be accessed at https://www.regulations.gov (Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2008–0727). The EPA is extending the comment period due to public requests that have been made stating that additional time is needed in order to fully evaluate our proposed rule and provide substantive comment. We are extending the comment period for our proposed rule until December 22, 2011. Dated: November 9, 2011. Carl E. Edlund, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Director, Region 6. [FR Doc. 2011–29724 Filed 11–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Note: Comments are posted without changes or edits to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. There is a privacy statement published on https:// www.regulations.gov. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 49 CFR Part 192 [Docket ID PHMSA–2011–0023] Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA); DOT. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period. AGENCY: On August 25, 2011, (76 FR 53086) PHMSA published in the Federal Register an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) titled: ‘‘Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines’’ seeking comments on the need for changes to the regulations covering gas transmission pipelines. PHMSA has received requests to extend the comment period in order to have more time to evaluate the ANPRM. PHMSA is extending the comment period from December 2, 2011, to January 20, 2012. DATES: The closing date for filing comments is extended from December 2, 2011, until January 20, 2012. ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA–2011–0023 and may be submitted in the following ways: • E-Gov Web Site: https:// www.Regulations.gov. This site allows the public to enter comments on any erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 SUMMARY: 15:39 Nov 15, 2011 For further information contact Mike Israni at (202) 366–4566 or by email at mike.israni@dot.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 25, 2011, (76 FR 53086), PHMSA published an ANPRM seeking comments on the need for changes to the regulations covering gas transmission pipelines. Within this ANPRM, PHMSA is seeking public comment on 15 specific topic areas in two broad categories (integrity management (IM) and Non-IM requirements). In particular, PHMSA is interested in knowing whether IM requirements should be changed, more prescriptive language added in some areas, and non-IM requirements strengthened or expanded. Among the specific issues PHMSA is considering concerning IM requirements is whether the definition of a high-consequence area should be revised, and whether additional restrictions should be placed on the use of specific pipeline assessment methods. With respect to non-IM requirements, PHMSA is considering whether revised requirements are needed on new construction or existing pipelines concerning mainline valves, whether requirements for corrosion control of steel pipelines should be strengthened, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RIN 2137–AE72 VerDate Mar<15>2010 Federal Register notice issued by any agency. • Fax: 1 (202) 493–2251. • Mail: DOT Docket Management System: U.S. DOT, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 0001. Hand Delivery: U.S. DOT Docket Management System; West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Instructions: You should identify the Docket No. PHMSA–2011–0023 at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail, submit two copies. To receive confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit comments at https:// www.regulations.gov. Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 70953 and whether new regulations are needed to govern the safety of gathering lines and underground gas storage facilities. On September 9, 2011, the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) and the American Gas Association (AGA) requested that PHMSA extend the comment period of the ANPRM by 90 days. INGAA and AGA supported their request stating that the ANPRM poses a large number of multi-part questions that cover 15 separate topic areas. They stated that to thoughtfully and thoroughly address the issues, significant effort on the part of all stakeholders is required, and may include industry-wide surveys. They stated that questions regarding cost implications and various other impacts will entail an integrated effort within the industry to provide a quality, validated, and vetted answer. Also, they stated that timing supports their request because they are currently in the initial phases of implementing the Control Room Management regulations, and completing and verifying their 2011 projects and conducting maintenance, budget and planning activities that will directly impact their pipeline safety compliance efforts this year and next. In addition, they stated that PHMSA granted an extension of time allowing parties four months to comment on the hazardous liquid ANPRM and, therefore, a 90-day extension of the comment period is further justified by the depth and scope of the issues addressed in the natural gas ANPRM. Through this ANPRM, PHMSA has raised several important and complex public safety issues, many of which, if implemented, could impose significant cost on the pipeline industry. PHMSA needs very thorough responses to the questions we have posed in the ANPRM in order to facilitate PHMSA’s decision making on these very important and complex issues. Based on the reasons given by INGAA and AGA in their request to extend the comment period, and PHMSA’s need to have the best data possible to facilitate its decisions relative to these issues, PHMSA believes that extension of the comment period is warranted. Therefore, PHMSA has extended the comment period from December 2, 2011, to January 20, 2012. Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3, 2011. Jeffrey D. Wiese, Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety. [FR Doc. 2011–29497 Filed 11–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–60–P E:\FR\FM\16NOP1.SGM 16NOP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 70953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29497]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 192

[Docket ID PHMSA-2011-0023]
RIN 2137-AE72


Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA); 
DOT.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment 
period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 25, 2011, (76 FR 53086) PHMSA published in the 
Federal Register an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) 
titled: ``Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines'' seeking comments on 
the need for changes to the regulations covering gas transmission 
pipelines. PHMSA has received requests to extend the comment period in 
order to have more time to evaluate the ANPRM. PHMSA is extending the 
comment period from December 2, 2011, to January 20, 2012.

DATES: The closing date for filing comments is extended from December 
2, 2011, until January 20, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA-2011-0023 and may 
be submitted in the following ways:
     E-Gov Web Site: https://www.Regulations.gov. This site 
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice 
issued by any agency.
     Fax: 1 (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: DOT Docket Management System: U.S. DOT, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    Hand Delivery: U.S. DOT Docket Management System; West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 
20590-0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays.
    Instructions: You should identify the Docket No. PHMSA-2011-0023 at 
the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail, 
submit two copies. To receive confirmation that PHMSA received your 
comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may 
submit comments at https://www.regulations.gov.

    Note: Comments are posted without changes or edits to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. 
There is a privacy statement published on https://
www.regulations.gov.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Mike 
Israni at (202) 366-4566 or by email at mike.israni@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 25, 2011, (76 FR 53086), PHMSA 
published an ANPRM seeking comments on the need for changes to the 
regulations covering gas transmission pipelines. Within this ANPRM, 
PHMSA is seeking public comment on 15 specific topic areas in two broad 
categories (integrity management (IM) and Non-IM requirements). In 
particular, PHMSA is interested in knowing whether IM requirements 
should be changed, more prescriptive language added in some areas, and 
non-IM requirements strengthened or expanded. Among the specific issues 
PHMSA is considering concerning IM requirements is whether the 
definition of a high-consequence area should be revised, and whether 
additional restrictions should be placed on the use of specific 
pipeline assessment methods. With respect to non-IM requirements, PHMSA 
is considering whether revised requirements are needed on new 
construction or existing pipelines concerning mainline valves, whether 
requirements for corrosion control of steel pipelines should be 
strengthened, and whether new regulations are needed to govern the 
safety of gathering lines and underground gas storage facilities.
    On September 9, 2011, the Interstate Natural Gas Association of 
America (INGAA) and the American Gas Association (AGA) requested that 
PHMSA extend the comment period of the ANPRM by 90 days. INGAA and AGA 
supported their request stating that the ANPRM poses a large number of 
multi-part questions that cover 15 separate topic areas. They stated 
that to thoughtfully and thoroughly address the issues, significant 
effort on the part of all stakeholders is required, and may include 
industry-wide surveys. They stated that questions regarding cost 
implications and various other impacts will entail an integrated effort 
within the industry to provide a quality, validated, and vetted answer. 
Also, they stated that timing supports their request because they are 
currently in the initial phases of implementing the Control Room 
Management regulations, and completing and verifying their 2011 
projects and conducting maintenance, budget and planning activities 
that will directly impact their pipeline safety compliance efforts this 
year and next. In addition, they stated that PHMSA granted an extension 
of time allowing parties four months to comment on the hazardous liquid 
ANPRM and, therefore, a 90-day extension of the comment period is 
further justified by the depth and scope of the issues addressed in the 
natural gas ANPRM.
    Through this ANPRM, PHMSA has raised several important and complex 
public safety issues, many of which, if implemented, could impose 
significant cost on the pipeline industry. PHMSA needs very thorough 
responses to the questions we have posed in the ANPRM in order to 
facilitate PHMSA's decision making on these very important and complex 
issues. Based on the reasons given by INGAA and AGA in their request to 
extend the comment period, and PHMSA's need to have the best data 
possible to facilitate its decisions relative to these issues, PHMSA 
believes that extension of the comment period is warranted. Therefore, 
PHMSA has extended the comment period from December 2, 2011, to January 
20, 2012.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 3, 2011.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2011-29497 Filed 11-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.