Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 70805-70807 [2011-29470]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 15, 2011 / Notices
• Estimated Number of Respondents:
3,500 annually.
• Estimated Number of Responses:
3,500.
• Average Hours per Response:
1 hour (60 minutes).
• Total Estimated Burden: 3,500
annual hours.
• Frequency: On occasion.
• Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
DATES: Submit comments to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
up to 30 days from November 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the
Department of State Desk Officer in the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs at the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). You may submit
comments by the following methods:
• Email:
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. You
must include the DS form number,
information collection title, and OMB
control number in the subject line of
your message.
• Fax: (202) 395–5806. Attention:
Desk Officer for Department of State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may obtain copies of the proposed
information collection and supporting
documents from Sumitra Siram, Office
of Admissions, Bureau of Population,
Refugees and Migration (PRM), PRM/
Admissions, 2401 E Street NW., Suite
L505, SA–1 Washington, DC 20522, who
may be reached on (202) 453–9250 or at
SiramS@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
soliciting public comments to permit
the Department to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary to
properly perform our functions.
• Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the reporting burden on
those who are to respond,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Abstract of Proposed Collection
The Affidavit of Relationship (AOR) is
required by the Department of State to
establish qualifications for access to the
Priority 3—Family Reunification
category of the United States Refugee
Admissions Program (USRAP)—by
persons of certain nationalities of
special humanitarian concern who are
family members of qualifying ‘‘anchors’’
(persons already admitted to the U.S. as
refugees or granted asylum, including
persons who may now be lawful
permanent residents or U.S. citizens).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Nov 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
Qualifying family members of U.S.based anchors include spouses,
unmarried children under age 21, and
parents. Eligible nationalities are
selected following careful review of
several factors, including the United
Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees’ annual assessment of refugees
in need of resettlement, prospective or
ongoing repatriation efforts, and U.S.
foreign policy interests. The Priority 3
category is outlined in the annual
Proposed Refugee Admissions—Report
to Congress, which is submitted on
behalf of the President in fulfillment of
the requirements of Section 207(e)(1)–
(7) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, and authorized by the annual
Presidential Determination for Refugee
Admissions.
Methodology
Information for the Affidavit of
Relationship (AOR) is collected in
person by Voluntary Agencies around
the United States, which are
organizations that work under
cooperative agreements with the
Department of State, to provide a means
for current or former refugees and
asylees to claim a relationship with
certain family members that would
qualify those family members to apply
for access to refugee processing under
the Priority 3 category of the U.S.
Refugee Admissions Program. The
Voluntary Agencies then forward the
completed AORs to the Department of
State’s Refugee Processing Center (RPC)
for data entry and case processing.
Dated: November 8, 2011.
Kelly A. Gauger,
Deputy Director, Office of Admissions, Bureau
of Population, Refugees, and Migration,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–29472 Filed 11–14–11; 8:45 am]
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘The
Renaissance Portrait from Donatello to
Bellini,’’ imported from abroad for
temporary exhibition within the United
States, are of cultural significance. The
objects are imported pursuant to loan
agreements with the foreign owners or
custodians. I also determine that the
exhibition or display of the exhibit
objects at the Metropolitan Museum of
Art, New York, New York, from on or
about December 19, 2011, until on or
about March 18, 2012, and at possible
additional exhibitions or venues yet to
be determined, is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these Determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Paul W.
Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: (202) 632–6469). The
mailing address is U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite
5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.
Dated: November 8, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–29473 Filed 11–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7685]
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs;
Statutory Debarment Under the Arms
Export Control Act and the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 4710–33–P
Notice; Notice of Correction.
Notice is hereby given that
the Department of State has imposed
statutory debarment pursuant to
§ 127.7(c) of the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (‘‘ITAR’’) (22 CFR
parts 120 to 130) on persons convicted
of violating or attempting to violate
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control
Act, as amended, (‘‘AECA’’) (22 U.S.C.
2778). Further, a public notice was
published in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, November 2, 1993, listing
persons statutorily debarred pursuant to
the ITAR; this notice makes one
correction to that notice.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
is the date of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Aguirre, Director, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7686]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘The
Renaissance Portrait From Donatello
to Bellini’’
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, and Delegation of
Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70805
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
70806
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 15, 2011 / Notices
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State (202) 632–2798.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of
State from issuing licenses or other
approvals for the export of defense
articles or defense services where the
applicant, or any party to the export, has
been convicted of violating certain
statutes, including the AECA. The
statute permits limited exceptions to be
made on a case-by-case basis. In
implementing this provision, Section
127.7 of the ITAR provides for
‘‘statutory debarment’’ of any person
who has been convicted of violating or
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons
subject to statutory debarment are
prohibited from participating directly or
indirectly in the export of defense
articles, including technical data, or in
the furnishing of defense services for
which a license or other approval is
required.
Statutory debarment is based solely
upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United
States Court, and as such the
administrative debarment procedures
outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR are not
applicable.
The period for debarment will be
determined by the Assistant Secretary
for Political-Military Affairs based on
the underlying nature of the violations,
but will generally be for three years
from the date of conviction. Export
privileges may be reinstated only at the
request of the debarred person followed
by the necessary interagency
consultations, after a thorough review of
the circumstances surrounding the
conviction, and a finding that
appropriate steps have been taken to
mitigate any law enforcement concerns,
as required by Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA. Unless export privileges are
reinstated, however, the person remains
debarred.
Department of State policy permits
debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance, for reinstatement
beginning one year after the date of the
debarment. Any decision to grant
reinstatement can be made only after the
statutory requirements of Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA have been
satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction
exceptions, may be made to this
debarment determination on a case-bycase basis at the discretion of the
Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, after consulting with
the appropriate U.S. agencies. However,
such an exception would be granted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Nov 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular
attention to the following factors:
Whether an exception is warranted by
overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an
exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are
consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United
States; or whether other compelling
circumstances exist that are consistent
with the foreign policy or national
security interests of the United States,
and that do not conflict with law
enforcement concerns. Even if
exceptions are granted, the debarment
continues until subsequent
reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the
AECA and Section 127.7(c) of the ITAR,
the following persons are statutorily
debarred as of the date of this notice
(Name; Date of Conviction; District;
Case No.; Month/Year of Birth):
(1) Heriberto Alanis-Ortiz; September
11, 2010; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR00178–S1–001; January 1978.
(2) Amen Ahmed Ali, (aka Ali Amen
Alrowhani, Amin Al Rohany, Ameen
Alrohany); January 18, 2011; U.S.
District Court, Eastern District of
California; Case No. 1:06CR00292–001;
June 1950.
(3) Rogelio Barajas; February 15, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Northern District of
Illinois; Case No. 09–CR–1058; August
1967.
(4) Brian William Barthrop; December
22, 2010; U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona; Case No. CR–09–00731–001–
TUC–RRC (CRP); October 1946.
(5) Jesse Ivan Cantu; March 15, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of
Texas; Case No. 1:10CR01201–002;
December 1986.
(6) Charles Carper; October 20, 2010;
U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii;
Case No. 1:08CR00655–002; May 1986.
(7) Isaac Cervantes-Sanchez; February
24, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR01331–S1–001; March 1981.
(8) Chitron Electronics, Inc.; February
9, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08–CR–
10386–004–PBS .
(9) Lawrence Davis (aka Larry Davis);
April 23, 2009; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York; Case No.
1:07–CR–1023–01(LAK); July 1945.
(10) Gwendolyn Douglas (aka Gwen
Douglas); April 14, 2009; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of New York;
Case No. 07CR–1006; March 1955.
(11) Cesar Augusto Flores-Demara;
February 14, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona; Case No. CR–10–
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
01581–001–TUC–DCB(CRP); February
1974.
(12) Ernesto Gonzalez-Reyes; October
4, 2010; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR00440–001; August 1961.
(13) Mythili Gopal; August 18, 2008;
U.S. District Court, District of the
District of Columbia; Case No. CR 07–
0292–01; June 1970.
(14) Noshir S. Gowadia; February 4,
2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Hawaii; Case No. 1:05CR00486–001;
April 1944.
(15) Raul Gutierrez-Marroquin;
February 17, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
1:10CR01201–001; May 1988.
(16) Fidel Jesus Hernandez; November
23, 2010; U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona; Case No. CR–07–02111–002–
TUC–DCB(CRP); February 1973.
(17) Boniface Ibe; July 12, 2011; U.S.
District Court, District of Maryland;
Case No. DKC–8–11–CR–00097–001;
June 1961.
(18) Gong Kim; January 25, 2011; U.S.
District Court, District of Oregon; Case
No. CR–10–25–01–HA; August 1971.
(19) Mark Komoroski; July 29, 2010;
U.S. District Court, Middle District of
Pennsylvania; Case No. 3:CR08–228;
July 1962.
(20) Chi Tong Kuok, (aka Edison
Kuok, Eddy Kuok, James Kuok, Yoko
Chong, Yoko Kawasaki); September 16,
2010; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of California; Case No.
09CR2581–BEN; March 1967.
(21) Jose Lara; January 27, 2011; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00698–001;
October 1983.
(22) Gregorio Larios, Jr.; March 17,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
1:10CR00742–001; November 1980.
(23) Sergio Rafael Lopez-Medina;
March 15, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
1:10CR00699–002; August 1990.
(24) Xiaodong Sheldon Meng; June 24,
2008; U.S. District Court, Northern
District of California; Case No. CR–04–
20216–001–JF; January 1964.
(25) Chanoch Miller; January 7, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of
Florida; Case No. 0:10CR60177–COHN–
2; December 1956.
(26) Jose Jesus Miramontes-Duarte;
April 23, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
7:09CR00339–002; May 1951.
(27) Abraham Molina-Barron; May 13,
2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Arizona; Case No. CR–10–02778–001–
TUC–CKJ(HCE); December 1972.
(28) Jacques Monsieur; October 1,
2010; U.S. District Court, Southern
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 15, 2011 / Notices
District of Alabama; Case No. 09–
00186–001–WS; March 1953.
(29) George Frank Myles Jr. (aka
George Miles); November 10, 2008; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
Florida; Case No. 07–20930–CR–
UNGARO; September 1948.
(30) Emenike Charles Nwankwoala;
January 6, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of Maryland; Case No. PJM–8–
10–CR–00179–001; October 1960.
(31) Andrew V. O’Donnell; August 1,
2011; U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10–CR–
491–CAP; July 1997.
(32) Joseph O’Toole; December 14,
2010; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Florida; Case No.
0:10CR60177–COHN–1; May 1931.
(33) Sergio Perez-Contreras; August 2,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:09CR00339–001; March 1938
(34) Julio Cesar Ramirez; June 30,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:11CR00288–001; July 1989.
(35) Julio Salazar-Galan; October 22,
2010; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
1:10CR00400–001; July 1990.
(36) Juan Sauceda-Rangel; May 23,
2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR01794–001; May 1981.
(37) Christian Sepulveda-Ortiz;
December 17, 2010; U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona; Case No. CR–10–
02111–001–TUC–CKJ(DTF); June 1983.
(38) Parthasarathy Sudarshan; June
17, 2008; U.S. District Court, District of
the District of Columbia; Case No. CR
08–0037; June 1960.
(39) Paul Taylor; March 18, 2011; U.S.
District Court, District of Delaware; Case
No. 09CR121–LPS; August 1966.
(40) Alain Teran; January 13, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of
Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00699–001; June
1986.
(41) Eduardo Torres; November 4,
2010; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No.
1:10CR00330–001; August 1980.
(42) Andrei Antonio Torres-Vasquez;
November 15, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No.
7:10CR01111–001; December 1985.
(43) Stephanie Monique Townsend;
August 24, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of California; Case No.
09CR4271–MMA; January 1989.
(44) Rolando Trevino; June 10, 2011;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of
Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01793–001;
August 1987.
(45) Universal Industries Limited,
Inc.; August 22, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Florida; Case
No. 9:11–80058–CR–MARRA–2.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:06 Nov 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
(46) Yufeng Wei (aka Annie Wei);
February 4, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of Massachusetts; Case No.
1:08–CR–10386–002–PBS; April 1964.
(47) Zhen Zhou Wu (aka Alex Wu);
January 27, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of Massachusetts; Case No.
1:08–CR–10386–001–PBS; March 1964.
As noted above, at the end of the
three-year period following the date of
this notice, the above named persons/
entities remain debarred unless export
privileges are reinstated.
Debarred persons are generally
ineligible to participate in activity
regulated under the ITAR (see e.g.,
sections 120.1(c) and (d), and 127.11(a)).
Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the
ITAR, any person who has knowledge
that another person is subject to
debarment or is otherwise ineligible
may not, without disclosure to and
written approval from the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls, participate,
directly or indirectly, in any export in
which such ineligible person may
benefit there from or have a direct or
indirect interest therein.
Further, Federal Register document
93–26888, published at 58 FR 58586,
Tuesday, November 2, 1993, is corrected
on page 58586, line 50 through line 57
to read as follows:
1. Tsutomu Iida, 333 8th Maloka-Cho
Totsuka-Ku, Kokohama, Japan, 18 U.S.C. 371
(conspiracy to violate 22 U.S.C. 2778),
December 17, 1992, United States v. Japan
Aviation Electronics Industry, Ltd., et al.,
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia,
Criminal Docket No. 91–516–10.
That notice of statutory debarment
incorrectly identified the debarred party
as ‘‘Tsotomu Ida.’’
This notice is provided for purposes
of making the public aware that the
persons listed above are prohibited from
participating directly or indirectly in
activities regulated by the ITAR,
including any brokering activities and
in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense
articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations
covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the
Office of the Clerk for the U.S. District
Courts mentioned above and by citing
the court case number where provided.
Dated: November 8, 2011.
Andrew J. Shapiro,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–29470 Filed 11–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70807
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Passenger Facility Charge
(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Monthly notice of PFC
approvals and disapprovals. In October
2011, there were six applications
approved. This notice also includes
information on one application,
approved in September 2011,
inadvertently left off the September
2011 notice. Additionally, 14 approved
amendments to previously approved
applications are listed.
AGENCY:
The FAA publishes a monthly
notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals
and disapprovals under the provisions
of the Aviation Safety and Capacity
Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 158). This notice is published
pursuant to paragraph d of § 158.29.
SUMMARY:
PFC Applications Approved
Public Agency: City of Orlando,
Florida.
Application Number: 11–14–C–00–
MCO.
Application Type: Impose and use a
PFC.
PFC Level: $3.00.
Total PFC Revenue Approved In This
Decision: $26,952,400.
Earliest Charge Effective Date:
February 1, 2026.
Estimated Charge Expiration Date:
June 1, 2026.
Class of Air Carriers Not Required To
Collect PFC’s: None.
Brief Description of Projects Approved
For Collection and Use:
Emergency electrical system
improvements: Landside phase 2 and
airside terminal 4 phase 1 (design and
construction).
Enplane road structural
improvements (design and
construction).
Landside signage improvements
(design and construction).
Taxiway B–2 extension and taxiway
B–1 rehabilitation (design and
construction).
Elevator and escalator safety code
compliance improvements (design and
construction).
Runway 18U36R structural joint
rehabilitation.
Closed circuit television
improvements (design and
construction).
Brief Description of Projects Partially
Approved For Collection and Use:
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70805-70807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29470]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7685]
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Statutory Debarment Under
the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations
ACTION: Notice; Notice of Correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has
imposed statutory debarment pursuant to Sec. 127.7(c) of the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (``ITAR'') (22 CFR parts 120
to 130) on persons convicted of violating or attempting to violate
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended, (``AECA'') (22
U.S.C. 2778). Further, a public notice was published in the Federal
Register on Tuesday, November 2, 1993, listing persons statutorily
debarred pursuant to the ITAR; this notice makes one correction to that
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date is the date of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Aguirre, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of
[[Page 70806]]
Political-Military Affairs, Department of State (202) 632-2798.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA, 22 U.S.C.
2778(g)(4), prohibits the Department of State from issuing licenses or
other approvals for the export of defense articles or defense services
where the applicant, or any party to the export, has been convicted of
violating certain statutes, including the AECA. The statute permits
limited exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis. In implementing
this provision, Section 127.7 of the ITAR provides for ``statutory
debarment'' of any person who has been convicted of violating or
conspiring to violate the AECA. Persons subject to statutory debarment
are prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in the export
of defense articles, including technical data, or in the furnishing of
defense services for which a license or other approval is required.
Statutory debarment is based solely upon conviction in a criminal
proceeding, conducted by a United States Court, and as such the
administrative debarment procedures outlined in Part 128 of the ITAR
are not applicable.
The period for debarment will be determined by the Assistant
Secretary for Political-Military Affairs based on the underlying nature
of the violations, but will generally be for three years from the date
of conviction. Export privileges may be reinstated only at the request
of the debarred person followed by the necessary interagency
consultations, after a thorough review of the circumstances surrounding
the conviction, and a finding that appropriate steps have been taken to
mitigate any law enforcement concerns, as required by Section 38(g)(4)
of the AECA. Unless export privileges are reinstated, however, the
person remains debarred.
Department of State policy permits debarred persons to apply to the
Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, for
reinstatement beginning one year after the date of the debarment. Any
decision to grant reinstatement can be made only after the statutory
requirements of Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA have been satisfied.
Exceptions, also known as transaction exceptions, may be made to
this debarment determination on a case-by-case basis at the discretion
of the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs,
after consulting with the appropriate U.S. agencies. However, such an
exception would be granted only after a full review of all
circumstances, paying particular attention to the following factors:
Whether an exception is warranted by overriding U.S. foreign policy or
national security interests; whether an exception would further law
enforcement concerns that are consistent with the foreign policy or
national security interests of the United States; or whether other
compelling circumstances exist that are consistent with the foreign
policy or national security interests of the United States, and that do
not conflict with law enforcement concerns. Even if exceptions are
granted, the debarment continues until subsequent reinstatement.
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and Section 127.7(c) of
the ITAR, the following persons are statutorily debarred as of the date
of this notice (Name; Date of Conviction; District; Case No.; Month/
Year of Birth):
(1) Heriberto Alanis-Ortiz; September 11, 2010; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR00178-S1-001; January
1978.
(2) Amen Ahmed Ali, (aka Ali Amen Alrowhani, Amin Al Rohany, Ameen
Alrohany); January 18, 2011; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of
California; Case No. 1:06CR00292-001; June 1950.
(3) Rogelio Barajas; February 15, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Illinois; Case No. 09-CR-1058; August 1967.
(4) Brian William Barthrop; December 22, 2010; U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona; Case No. CR-09-00731-001-TUC-RRC (CRP); October
1946.
(5) Jesse Ivan Cantu; March 15, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR01201-002; December 1986.
(6) Charles Carper; October 20, 2010; U.S. District Court, District
of Hawaii; Case No. 1:08CR00655-002; May 1986.
(7) Isaac Cervantes-Sanchez; February 24, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01331-S1-001; March
1981.
(8) Chitron Electronics, Inc.; February 9, 2011; U.S. District
Court, District of Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08-CR-10386-004-PBS .
(9) Lawrence Davis (aka Larry Davis); April 23, 2009; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of New York; Case No. 1:07-CR-1023-01(LAK);
July 1945.
(10) Gwendolyn Douglas (aka Gwen Douglas); April 14, 2009; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of New York; Case No. 07CR-1006;
March 1955.
(11) Cesar Augusto Flores-Demara; February 14, 2011; U.S. District
Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR-10-01581-001-TUC-DCB(CRP);
February 1974.
(12) Ernesto Gonzalez-Reyes; October 4, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR00440-001; August 1961.
(13) Mythili Gopal; August 18, 2008; U.S. District Court, District
of the District of Columbia; Case No. CR 07-0292-01; June 1970.
(14) Noshir S. Gowadia; February 4, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of Hawaii; Case No. 1:05CR00486-001; April 1944.
(15) Raul Gutierrez-Marroquin; February 17, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR01201-001; May 1988.
(16) Fidel Jesus Hernandez; November 23, 2010; U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona; Case No. CR-07-02111-002-TUC-DCB(CRP); February
1973.
(17) Boniface Ibe; July 12, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Maryland; Case No. DKC-8-11-CR-00097-001; June 1961.
(18) Gong Kim; January 25, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Oregon; Case No. CR-10-25-01-HA; August 1971.
(19) Mark Komoroski; July 29, 2010; U.S. District Court, Middle
District of Pennsylvania; Case No. 3:CR08-228; July 1962.
(20) Chi Tong Kuok, (aka Edison Kuok, Eddy Kuok, James Kuok, Yoko
Chong, Yoko Kawasaki); September 16, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of California; Case No. 09CR2581-BEN; March 1967.
(21) Jose Lara; January 27, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00698-001; October 1983.
(22) Gregorio Larios, Jr.; March 17, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00742-001; November 1980.
(23) Sergio Rafael Lopez-Medina; March 15, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00699-002; August
1990.
(24) Xiaodong Sheldon Meng; June 24, 2008; U.S. District Court,
Northern District of California; Case No. CR-04-20216-001-JF; January
1964.
(25) Chanoch Miller; January 7, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Florida; Case No. 0:10CR60177-COHN-2; December 1956.
(26) Jose Jesus Miramontes-Duarte; April 23, 2011; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:09CR00339-002; May 1951.
(27) Abraham Molina-Barron; May 13, 2011; U.S. District Court,
District of Arizona; Case No. CR-10-02778-001-TUC-CKJ(HCE); December
1972.
(28) Jacques Monsieur; October 1, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern
[[Page 70807]]
District of Alabama; Case No. 09-00186-001-WS; March 1953.
(29) George Frank Myles Jr. (aka George Miles); November 10, 2008;
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 07-20930-
CR-UNGARO; September 1948.
(30) Emenike Charles Nwankwoala; January 6, 2011; U.S. District
Court, District of Maryland; Case No. PJM-8-10-CR-00179-001; October
1960.
(31) Andrew V. O'Donnell; August 1, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Northern District of Georgia; Case No. 1:10-CR-491-CAP; July 1997.
(32) Joseph O'Toole; December 14, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Florida; Case No. 0:10CR60177-COHN-1; May 1931.
(33) Sergio Perez-Contreras; August 2, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:09CR00339-001; March 1938
(34) Julio Cesar Ramirez; June 30, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:11CR00288-001; July 1989.
(35) Julio Salazar-Galan; October 22, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00400-001; July 1990.
(36) Juan Sauceda-Rangel; May 23, 2011; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01794-001; May 1981.
(37) Christian Sepulveda-Ortiz; December 17, 2010; U.S. District
Court, District of Arizona; Case No. CR-10-02111-001-TUC-CKJ(DTF); June
1983.
(38) Parthasarathy Sudarshan; June 17, 2008; U.S. District Court,
District of the District of Columbia; Case No. CR 08-0037; June 1960.
(39) Paul Taylor; March 18, 2011; U.S. District Court, District of
Delaware; Case No. 09CR121-LPS; August 1966.
(40) Alain Teran; January 13, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00699-001; June 1986.
(41) Eduardo Torres; November 4, 2010; U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Texas; Case No. 1:10CR00330-001; August 1980.
(42) Andrei Antonio Torres-Vasquez; November 15, 2010; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01111-001;
December 1985.
(43) Stephanie Monique Townsend; August 24, 2010; U.S. District
Court, Southern District of California; Case No. 09CR4271-MMA; January
1989.
(44) Rolando Trevino; June 10, 2011; U.S. District Court, Southern
District of Texas; Case No. 7:10CR01793-001; August 1987.
(45) Universal Industries Limited, Inc.; August 22, 2011; U.S.
District Court, Southern District of Florida; Case No. 9:11-80058-CR-
MARRA-2.
(46) Yufeng Wei (aka Annie Wei); February 4, 2011; U.S. District
Court, District of Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08-CR-10386-002-PBS; April
1964.
(47) Zhen Zhou Wu (aka Alex Wu); January 27, 2011; U.S. District
Court, District of Massachusetts; Case No. 1:08-CR-10386-001-PBS; March
1964.
As noted above, at the end of the three-year period following the
date of this notice, the above named persons/entities remain debarred
unless export privileges are reinstated.
Debarred persons are generally ineligible to participate in
activity regulated under the ITAR (see e.g., sections 120.1(c) and (d),
and 127.11(a)). Also, under Section 127.1(c) of the ITAR, any person
who has knowledge that another person is subject to debarment or is
otherwise ineligible may not, without disclosure to and written
approval from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, participate,
directly or indirectly, in any export in which such ineligible person
may benefit there from or have a direct or indirect interest therein.
Further, Federal Register document 93-26888, published at 58 FR
58586, Tuesday, November 2, 1993, is corrected on page 58586, line 50
through line 57 to read as follows:
1. Tsutomu Iida, 333 8th Maloka-Cho Totsuka-Ku, Kokohama, Japan,
18 U.S.C. 371 (conspiracy to violate 22 U.S.C. 2778), December 17,
1992, United States v. Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, Ltd., et
al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, Criminal Docket No.
91-516-10.
That notice of statutory debarment incorrectly identified the debarred
party as ``Tsotomu Ida.''
This notice is provided for purposes of making the public aware
that the persons listed above are prohibited from participating
directly or indirectly in activities regulated by the ITAR, including
any brokering activities and in any export from or temporary import
into the United States of defense articles, related technical data, or
defense services in all situations covered by the ITAR. Specific case
information may be obtained from the Office of the Clerk for the U.S.
District Courts mentioned above and by citing the court case number
where provided.
Dated: November 8, 2011.
Andrew J. Shapiro,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-29470 Filed 11-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
