West Oahu Offshore Security Zone, 70350-70352 [2011-29456]

Download as PDF 70350 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket No. USCG–2011–1048] RIN 1625–AA87 West Oahu Offshore Security Zone Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone on the navigable waters of Oahu’s western shore. This action is necessary to safeguard the President of the United States and his official party. Entry into the temporary security zone established by this rule is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Honolulu, or her designated representatives. DATES: This rule is effective from 11 p.m. HST on November 13, 2011 through 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011. SUMMARY: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket are part of docket USCG–2011– 1048 and are available online by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–2011–1048 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They are also available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this temporary rule, call or email LCDR Scott O. Whaley, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (808) 522–8264 (ext. 352), email Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES Regulatory Information The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Nov 10, 2011 Jkt 226001 ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule. Due to a change in the plans of the President of the United States, sufficient notice of the zone location could not be released in time to adequately complete a noticeand-comment rulemaking. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Because of a change in the plans of the President of the United States, there is insufficient time before the security zone must be in place to publish this temporary final rule and then delay its effective date for 30 days after publication. Background and Purpose From November 13, 2011, through November 15, 2011, the President of the United States and his official party will be visiting the Ko’olina Beach Resort in Honolulu, Hawaii. The resort is located adjacent to U.S. navigable waters in the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone. Accordingly, the U.S. Coast Guard is establishing this security zone in order to maintain optimum security to ultimately protect the President and his official party from all possible threats associated with vessels and persons in the water. Entry of persons or vessels into these security zones will be prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu. Discussion of Temporary Final Rule This temporary final rule will be effective from 11 p.m. HST on November 13, 2011 through 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011. The security zone area is designated as the West Oahu Offshore Zone and covers all waters creating a box shape, encompassed by a line extending 1000 yards north along the coast from 21°20′16.00″ N, 158°07′34.77″ W; to 21°20′43.98″ N, 158°07′44.52″ W; then 1000 yards west to 21°20′36.10″ N, 158°08′15.18″ W; then 2000 yards south to 21°19′38.93″ N, 158°07′54.33″ W; then east to 21°19′1647.64″ N, 158°07′23.79″ W; then north along the shoreline back to the starting point. The West Oahu Offshore Zone does not include the entrance of Barbers Point Harbor Channel or the four lagoons adjacent to the Ko’olina Resort. In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart D, no person or vessel will be permitted to transit into or remain in the zone except for those authorized support PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 vessels, aircraft and support personnel, or other personnel or vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or the District Commander. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, or other Captain of the Port representative permitted by law, may enforce the zone. Vessels, aircraft, or persons in violation of this rule will be subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192. Vessels, aircraft, or persons in violation of this rule will be subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192. Regulatory Analyses We developed this temporary final rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders. Regulatory Planning and Review This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This conclusion is based on the limited duration of the zone and the limited geographic area affected by it. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule could affect the following entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels for hire intending to transit or operate in the West Oahu Security Zone from November 13, 2011 to on November 15, 2011. This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: the security zone E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations will be activated and thus subject to enforcement for a period of no longer than 2 days and will not affect vessels transiting or operating outside a box extending along the coast 1000 yards to the north of the northern most lagoon at the Ko’olina Resort, to 1000 yards south, along the coast, of Ko’olina’s northern most lagoon to 1000 yards to seaward from both points and then connected with a straight line. Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule will affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact LCDR Scott O. Whaley at (808) 522–8264 ext. 352. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1 (888) 734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and will not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Nov 10, 2011 Jkt 226001 The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 70351 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2– 1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This regulation establishes one security zone. A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion Determination’’ are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREA AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2. Add § 165.T14–1048 to read as follows: ■ E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1 70352 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES § 165.T14–1048 Security Zone. West Oahu Offshore (a) Location. The following area, from the surface of the water to the ocean floor, is a security zone: All waters encompassed by a line extending 1000 yards north along the coast from 21°20′16.00″ N, 158°07′34.77″ W; to 21°20′43.98″ N, 158°07′44.52″ W; then 1000 yards west to 21°20′36.10″ N, 158°08′15.18″ W; then 2000 yards south to 21°19′38.93″ N, 158°07′54.33″ W; then east to 21°19′1647.64″ N, 158°07′23.79″ W; then north along the shoreline back to the starting point. The West Oahu Offshore Zone does not include the entrance of Barbers Point Harbor Channel or the four lagoons adjacent to the Ko’olina Resort. (b) Enforcement period. The security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section will be enforced from 11 p.m. HST on November 13, 2011, to 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011. (c) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port Honolulu to assist in enforcing the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section. (d) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33 CFR part 165, subpart D, apply to the security zone created by this temporary section. (1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations governing security zone found in 33 CFR 165.33. (2) Entry into or remaining in the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Honolulu. (3) Persons desiring to transit the security zone identified in paragraph (a) of this section may contact the Captain of the Port at Command Center telephone number (808) 842–2600 and (808) 842–2601, fax (808) 842–2624 or on VHF channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek permission to transit the zone. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Honolulu or his designated representative and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course while within the zone. (e) Enforcement personnel. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Nov 10, 2011 Jkt 226001 Dated: November 4, 2011. J.M. Nunan, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu. [FR Doc. 2011–29456 Filed 11–9–11; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0499; FRL–9486–1] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Reasonably Available Control Technology for Oxides of Nitrogen for a Specific Source in the State of New Jersey Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing approval of a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone submitted by the State of New Jersey. This SIP revision consists of a source-specific reasonably available control technology (RACT) determination for controlling oxides of nitrogen from the stationary reciprocating, diesel fuel fired, internal combustion engines operated by the Naval Weapons Station Earle located in Colts Neck, New Jersey. This action approves the source-specific RACT determination that was made by New Jersey in accordance with the provisions of its regulation to help meet the national ambient air quality standard for ozone. The intended effect of this rule is to approve source-specific emissions limitations required by the Clean Air Act. SUMMARY: Effective Date: This rule is effective on December 14, 2011. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0499. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region II Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 New York 10007–1866. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (212) 637–4249. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raymond K. Forde, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10278, (212) 637–3716. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. What action is EPA taking today? EPA is approving New Jersey’s revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on May 14, 2009. This SIP revision relates to New Jersey’s NOX RACT determination for the Naval Weapons Station Earle (NWSE) facility located in Colts Neck, New Jersey, Monmouth County. The facility contains two stationary reciprocating, diesel fuel fired, internal combustion engines one existing and one new engine. II. What comments were received and what is EPA’s response? EPA received one comment from the public. The commenter expressed support for EPA’s proposed approval of the New Jersey SIP revision but was concerned about the length of time from the date EPA received the SIP revision request to the date of EPA’s proposal to approve the SIP revision. EPA understands the commenter’s concerns. However, due to the numerous SIP revisions that EPA receives, and the limited resources EPA has to act on all SIP revisions, EPA must process SIP revisions based on overall program priorities. III. Conclusion EPA has determined that New Jersey’s SIP revision for the NOX RACT determination for NWSE’s engines is consistent with New Jersey’s NOX RACT regulation and EPA’s guidance. EPA has determined that New Jersey’s SIP revision will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the Act. Therefore, EPA is approving the NOX emission limits identified in New Jersey’s Conditions of Approval document for NWSE’s engines. The conditions contained in the Conditions of Approval document currently specify emissions limits, work practice standards, testing, monitoring, and recordkeeping/reporting requirements. These conditions are consistent with the NOX RACT requirements specified in Subchapter 19 of Chapter 27, Title 7 of the New Jersey E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM 14NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70350-70352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29456]



[[Page 70350]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-1048]
RIN 1625-AA87


West Oahu Offshore Security Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone on 
the navigable waters of Oahu's western shore. This action is necessary 
to safeguard the President of the United States and his official party. 
Entry into the temporary security zone established by this rule is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, 
Honolulu, or her designated representatives.

DATES: This rule is effective from 11 p.m. HST on November 13, 2011 
through 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1048 and are available online 
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1048 in the 
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available 
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or email LCDR Scott O. Whaley, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone (808) 522-8264 (ext. 352), email Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil. If 
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, 
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 
(202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule. Due to a change in the plans of the 
President of the United States, sufficient notice of the zone location 
could not be released in time to adequately complete a notice-and-
comment rulemaking.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Because of a change in the plans 
of the President of the United States, there is insufficient time 
before the security zone must be in place to publish this temporary 
final rule and then delay its effective date for 30 days after 
publication.

Background and Purpose

    From November 13, 2011, through November 15, 2011, the President of 
the United States and his official party will be visiting the Ko'olina 
Beach Resort in Honolulu, Hawaii. The resort is located adjacent to 
U.S. navigable waters in the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone. 
Accordingly, the U.S. Coast Guard is establishing this security zone in 
order to maintain optimum security to ultimately protect the President 
and his official party from all possible threats associated with 
vessels and persons in the water. Entry of persons or vessels into 
these security zones will be prohibited unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu.

Discussion of Temporary Final Rule

    This temporary final rule will be effective from 11 p.m. HST on 
November 13, 2011 through 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011.
    The security zone area is designated as the West Oahu Offshore Zone 
and covers all waters creating a box shape, encompassed by a line 
extending 1000 yards north along the coast from 21[deg]20'16.00'' N, 
158[deg]07'34.77'' W; to 21[deg]20'43.98'' N, 158[deg]07'44.52'' W; 
then 1000 yards west to 21[deg]20'36.10'' N, 158[deg]08'15.18'' W; then 
2000 yards south to 21[deg]19'38.93'' N, 158[deg]07'54.33'' W; then 
east to 21[deg]19'1647.64'' N, 158[deg]07'23.79'' W; then north along 
the shoreline back to the starting point. The West Oahu Offshore Zone 
does not include the entrance of Barbers Point Harbor Channel or the 
four lagoons adjacent to the Ko'olina Resort.
    In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 165, 
subpart D, no person or vessel will be permitted to transit into or 
remain in the zone except for those authorized support vessels, 
aircraft and support personnel, or other personnel or vessels 
authorized by the Captain of the Port or the District Commander. Any 
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, or other Captain 
of the Port representative permitted by law, may enforce the zone. 
Vessels, aircraft, or persons in violation of this rule will be subject 
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
    Vessels, aircraft, or persons in violation of this rule will be 
subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this temporary final rule after considering numerous 
statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize 
our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard expects the economic 
impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation 
under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. 
This conclusion is based on the limited duration of the zone and the 
limited geographic area affected by it.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule could affect the following entities, some of which might 
be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels for hire 
intending to transit or operate in the West Oahu Security Zone from 
November 13, 2011 to on November 15, 2011.
    This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: the 
security zone

[[Page 70351]]

will be activated and thus subject to enforcement for a period of no 
longer than 2 days and will not affect vessels transiting or operating 
outside a box extending along the coast 1000 yards to the north of the 
northern most lagoon at the Ko'olina Resort, to 1000 yards south, along 
the coast, of Ko'olina's northern most lagoon to 1000 yards to seaward 
from both points and then connected with a straight line.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule will 
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction 
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for 
compliance, please contact LCDR Scott O. Whaley at (808) 522-8264 ext. 
352.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1 (888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and will not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a 
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do 
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, 
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This regulation establishes one 
security zone. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a 
final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the 
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREA AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 3306, 
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; 
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T14-1048 to read as follows:

[[Page 70352]]

Sec.  165.T14-1048  West Oahu Offshore Security Zone.

    (a) Location. The following area, from the surface of the water to 
the ocean floor, is a security zone: All waters encompassed by a line 
extending 1000 yards north along the coast from 21[deg]20'16.00'' N, 
158[deg]07'34.77'' W; to 21[deg]20'43.98'' N, 158[deg]07'44.52'' W; 
then 1000 yards west to 21[deg]20'36.10'' N, 158[deg]08'15.18'' W; then 
2000 yards south to 21[deg]19'38.93'' N, 158[deg]07'54.33'' W; then 
east to 21[deg]19'1647.64'' N, 158[deg]07'23.79'' W; then north along 
the shoreline back to the starting point. The West Oahu Offshore Zone 
does not include the entrance of Barbers Point Harbor Channel or the 
four lagoons adjacent to the Ko'olina Resort.
    (b) Enforcement period. The security zone described in paragraph 
(a) of this section will be enforced from 11 p.m. HST on November 13, 
2011, to 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011.
    (c) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has 
been authorized by the Captain of the Port Honolulu to assist in 
enforcing the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (d) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33 
CFR part 165, subpart D, apply to the security zone created by this 
temporary section.
    (1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations 
governing security zone found in 33 CFR 165.33.
    (2) Entry into or remaining in the security zone described in 
paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless authorized by the 
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Honolulu.
    (3) Persons desiring to transit the security zone identified in 
paragraph (a) of this section may contact the Captain of the Port at 
Command Center telephone number (808) 842-2600 and (808) 842-2601, fax 
(808) 842-2624 or on VHF channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek permission to 
transit the zone. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels 
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Honolulu 
or his designated representative and proceed at the minimum speed 
necessary to maintain a safe course while within the zone.
    (e) Enforcement personnel. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in 
the patrol and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local 
agencies.

    Dated: November 4, 2011.
J.M. Nunan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2011-29456 Filed 11-9-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.