West Oahu Offshore Security Zone, 70350-70352 [2011-29456]
Download as PDF
70350
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1048]
RIN 1625–AA87
West Oahu Offshore Security Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
on the navigable waters of Oahu’s
western shore. This action is necessary
to safeguard the President of the United
States and his official party. Entry into
the temporary security zone established
by this rule is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port, Honolulu, or her designated
representatives.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11
p.m. HST on November 13, 2011
through 9 a.m. HST on November 15,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
1048 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1048 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LCDR Scott O.
Whaley, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
(808) 522–8264 (ext. 352), email
Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. Due to a
change in the plans of the President of
the United States, sufficient notice of
the zone location could not be released
in time to adequately complete a noticeand-comment rulemaking.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Because of a change in the
plans of the President of the United
States, there is insufficient time before
the security zone must be in place to
publish this temporary final rule and
then delay its effective date for 30 days
after publication.
Background and Purpose
From November 13, 2011, through
November 15, 2011, the President of the
United States and his official party will
be visiting the Ko’olina Beach Resort in
Honolulu, Hawaii. The resort is located
adjacent to U.S. navigable waters in the
Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone.
Accordingly, the U.S. Coast Guard is
establishing this security zone in order
to maintain optimum security to
ultimately protect the President and his
official party from all possible threats
associated with vessels and persons in
the water. Entry of persons or vessels
into these security zones will be
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu.
Discussion of Temporary Final Rule
This temporary final rule will be
effective from 11 p.m. HST on
November 13, 2011 through 9 a.m. HST
on November 15, 2011.
The security zone area is designated
as the West Oahu Offshore Zone and
covers all waters creating a box shape,
encompassed by a line extending 1000
yards north along the coast from
21°20′16.00″ N, 158°07′34.77″ W; to
21°20′43.98″ N, 158°07′44.52″ W; then
1000 yards west to 21°20′36.10″ N,
158°08′15.18″ W; then 2000 yards south
to 21°19′38.93″ N, 158°07′54.33″ W;
then east to 21°19′1647.64″ N,
158°07′23.79″ W; then north along the
shoreline back to the starting point. The
West Oahu Offshore Zone does not
include the entrance of Barbers Point
Harbor Channel or the four lagoons
adjacent to the Ko’olina Resort.
In accordance with the general
regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart
D, no person or vessel will be permitted
to transit into or remain in the zone
except for those authorized support
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
vessels, aircraft and support personnel,
or other personnel or vessels authorized
by the Captain of the Port or the District
Commander. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer,
or other Captain of the Port
representative permitted by law, may
enforce the zone. Vessels, aircraft, or
persons in violation of this rule will be
subject to the penalties set forth in 33
U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Vessels, aircraft, or persons in
violation of this rule will be subject to
the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232
and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this temporary final
rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
This conclusion is based on the limited
duration of the zone and the limited
geographic area affected by it.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule could affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels for hire intending to transit or
operate in the West Oahu Security Zone
from November 13, 2011 to on
November 15, 2011.
This security zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: the security zone
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
will be activated and thus subject to
enforcement for a period of no longer
than 2 days and will not affect vessels
transiting or operating outside a box
extending along the coast 1000 yards to
the north of the northern most lagoon at
the Ko’olina Resort, to 1000 yards south,
along the coast, of Ko’olina’s northern
most lagoon to 1000 yards to seaward
from both points and then connected
with a straight line.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR Scott
O. Whaley at (808) 522–8264 ext. 352.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1 (888) 734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
will not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70351
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions
which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction.
This regulation establishes one security
zone. A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREA AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T14–1048 to read as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
70352
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T14–1048
Security Zone.
West Oahu Offshore
(a) Location. The following area, from
the surface of the water to the ocean
floor, is a security zone: All waters
encompassed by a line extending 1000
yards north along the coast from
21°20′16.00″ N, 158°07′34.77″ W; to
21°20′43.98″ N, 158°07′44.52″ W; then
1000 yards west to 21°20′36.10″ N,
158°08′15.18″ W; then 2000 yards south
to 21°19′38.93″ N, 158°07′54.33″ W;
then east to 21°19′1647.64″ N,
158°07′23.79″ W; then north along the
shoreline back to the starting point. The
West Oahu Offshore Zone does not
include the entrance of Barbers Point
Harbor Channel or the four lagoons
adjacent to the Ko’olina Resort.
(b) Enforcement period. The security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced from 11 p.m.
HST on November 13, 2011, to 9 a.m.
HST on November 15, 2011.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Honolulu to assist in enforcing the
security zone described in paragraph (a)
of this section.
(d) Regulations. The general security
zone regulations found in 33 CFR part
165, subpart D, apply to the security
zone created by this temporary section.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
security zone found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in the
security zone described in paragraph (a)
of this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port Honolulu.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the
security zone identified in paragraph (a)
of this section may contact the Captain
of the Port at Command Center
telephone number (808) 842–2600 and
(808) 842–2601, fax (808) 842–2624 or
on VHF channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek
permission to transit the zone. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Honolulu or his designated
representative and proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(e) Enforcement personnel. The U.S.
Coast Guard may be assisted in the
patrol and enforcement of the zone by
Federal, State, and local agencies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
Dated: November 4, 2011.
J.M. Nunan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2011–29456 Filed 11–9–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0499;
FRL–9486–1]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Reasonably
Available Control Technology for
Oxides of Nitrogen for a Specific
Source in the State of New Jersey
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing approval of
a revision to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) for ozone submitted by the
State of New Jersey. This SIP revision
consists of a source-specific reasonably
available control technology (RACT)
determination for controlling oxides of
nitrogen from the stationary
reciprocating, diesel fuel fired, internal
combustion engines operated by the
Naval Weapons Station Earle located in
Colts Neck, New Jersey. This action
approves the source-specific RACT
determination that was made by New
Jersey in accordance with the provisions
of its regulation to help meet the
national ambient air quality standard for
ozone. The intended effect of this rule
is to approve source-specific emissions
limitations required by the Clean Air
Act.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: This rule is
effective on December 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R02–OAR–2011–0499. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region II Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
New York 10007–1866. This Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The Docket telephone
number is (212) 637–4249.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Raymond K. Forde, Air Programs
Branch, Environmental Protection
Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New
York, New York 10278, (212) 637–3716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA taking today?
EPA is approving New Jersey’s
revision to the ozone State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
May 14, 2009. This SIP revision relates
to New Jersey’s NOX RACT
determination for the Naval Weapons
Station Earle (NWSE) facility located in
Colts Neck, New Jersey, Monmouth
County. The facility contains two
stationary reciprocating, diesel fuel
fired, internal combustion engines one
existing and one new engine.
II. What comments were received and
what is EPA’s response?
EPA received one comment from the
public. The commenter expressed
support for EPA’s proposed approval of
the New Jersey SIP revision but was
concerned about the length of time from
the date EPA received the SIP revision
request to the date of EPA’s proposal to
approve the SIP revision. EPA
understands the commenter’s concerns.
However, due to the numerous SIP
revisions that EPA receives, and the
limited resources EPA has to act on all
SIP revisions, EPA must process SIP
revisions based on overall program
priorities.
III. Conclusion
EPA has determined that New Jersey’s
SIP revision for the NOX RACT
determination for NWSE’s engines is
consistent with New Jersey’s NOX RACT
regulation and EPA’s guidance. EPA has
determined that New Jersey’s SIP
revision will not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. Therefore, EPA
is approving the NOX emission limits
identified in New Jersey’s Conditions of
Approval document for NWSE’s
engines. The conditions contained in
the Conditions of Approval document
currently specify emissions limits, work
practice standards, testing, monitoring,
and recordkeeping/reporting
requirements. These conditions are
consistent with the NOX RACT
requirements specified in Subchapter 19
of Chapter 27, Title 7 of the New Jersey
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70350-70352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29456]
[[Page 70350]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1048]
RIN 1625-AA87
West Oahu Offshore Security Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone on
the navigable waters of Oahu's western shore. This action is necessary
to safeguard the President of the United States and his official party.
Entry into the temporary security zone established by this rule is
prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port,
Honolulu, or her designated representatives.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11 p.m. HST on November 13, 2011
through 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1048 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1048 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email LCDR Scott O. Whaley, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone (808) 522-8264 (ext. 352), email Scott.O.Whaley@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
(202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. Due to a change in the plans of the
President of the United States, sufficient notice of the zone location
could not be released in time to adequately complete a notice-and-
comment rulemaking.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Because of a change in the plans
of the President of the United States, there is insufficient time
before the security zone must be in place to publish this temporary
final rule and then delay its effective date for 30 days after
publication.
Background and Purpose
From November 13, 2011, through November 15, 2011, the President of
the United States and his official party will be visiting the Ko'olina
Beach Resort in Honolulu, Hawaii. The resort is located adjacent to
U.S. navigable waters in the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone.
Accordingly, the U.S. Coast Guard is establishing this security zone in
order to maintain optimum security to ultimately protect the President
and his official party from all possible threats associated with
vessels and persons in the water. Entry of persons or vessels into
these security zones will be prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu.
Discussion of Temporary Final Rule
This temporary final rule will be effective from 11 p.m. HST on
November 13, 2011 through 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011.
The security zone area is designated as the West Oahu Offshore Zone
and covers all waters creating a box shape, encompassed by a line
extending 1000 yards north along the coast from 21[deg]20'16.00'' N,
158[deg]07'34.77'' W; to 21[deg]20'43.98'' N, 158[deg]07'44.52'' W;
then 1000 yards west to 21[deg]20'36.10'' N, 158[deg]08'15.18'' W; then
2000 yards south to 21[deg]19'38.93'' N, 158[deg]07'54.33'' W; then
east to 21[deg]19'1647.64'' N, 158[deg]07'23.79'' W; then north along
the shoreline back to the starting point. The West Oahu Offshore Zone
does not include the entrance of Barbers Point Harbor Channel or the
four lagoons adjacent to the Ko'olina Resort.
In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 165,
subpart D, no person or vessel will be permitted to transit into or
remain in the zone except for those authorized support vessels,
aircraft and support personnel, or other personnel or vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or the District Commander. Any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, or other Captain
of the Port representative permitted by law, may enforce the zone.
Vessels, aircraft, or persons in violation of this rule will be subject
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Vessels, aircraft, or persons in violation of this rule will be
subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this temporary final rule after considering numerous
statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize
our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard expects the economic
impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation
under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
This conclusion is based on the limited duration of the zone and the
limited geographic area affected by it.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule could affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels for hire
intending to transit or operate in the West Oahu Security Zone from
November 13, 2011 to on November 15, 2011.
This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: the
security zone
[[Page 70351]]
will be activated and thus subject to enforcement for a period of no
longer than 2 days and will not affect vessels transiting or operating
outside a box extending along the coast 1000 yards to the north of the
northern most lagoon at the Ko'olina Resort, to 1000 yards south, along
the coast, of Ko'olina's northern most lagoon to 1000 yards to seaward
from both points and then connected with a straight line.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule will
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR Scott O. Whaley at (808) 522-8264 ext.
352.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1 (888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This regulation establishes one
security zone. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a
final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREA AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T14-1048 to read as follows:
[[Page 70352]]
Sec. 165.T14-1048 West Oahu Offshore Security Zone.
(a) Location. The following area, from the surface of the water to
the ocean floor, is a security zone: All waters encompassed by a line
extending 1000 yards north along the coast from 21[deg]20'16.00'' N,
158[deg]07'34.77'' W; to 21[deg]20'43.98'' N, 158[deg]07'44.52'' W;
then 1000 yards west to 21[deg]20'36.10'' N, 158[deg]08'15.18'' W; then
2000 yards south to 21[deg]19'38.93'' N, 158[deg]07'54.33'' W; then
east to 21[deg]19'1647.64'' N, 158[deg]07'23.79'' W; then north along
the shoreline back to the starting point. The West Oahu Offshore Zone
does not include the entrance of Barbers Point Harbor Channel or the
four lagoons adjacent to the Ko'olina Resort.
(b) Enforcement period. The security zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section will be enforced from 11 p.m. HST on November 13,
2011, to 9 a.m. HST on November 15, 2011.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has
been authorized by the Captain of the Port Honolulu to assist in
enforcing the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33
CFR part 165, subpart D, apply to the security zone created by this
temporary section.
(1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing security zone found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in the security zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Honolulu.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the security zone identified in
paragraph (a) of this section may contact the Captain of the Port at
Command Center telephone number (808) 842-2600 and (808) 842-2601, fax
(808) 842-2624 or on VHF channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek permission to
transit the zone. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Honolulu
or his designated representative and proceed at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course while within the zone.
(e) Enforcement personnel. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in
the patrol and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
Dated: November 4, 2011.
J.M. Nunan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2011-29456 Filed 11-9-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P