Designation of Administrative Judges and Delegation of Authority, 70529-70530 [2011-29336]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7601]
Shipping Coordinating Committee;
Notice of Committee Meeting
The Shipping Coordinating
Committee (SHC) will conduct an open
meeting at 1 p.m. on Wednesday,
December 7, 2011, in Room 5–1224 of
the United States Coast Guard
Headquarters Building, 2100 Second
Street SW., Washington, DC 20593–
0001. The primary purpose of the
meeting is to prepare for the fifty fourth
Session of the International Maritime
Organization’s (IMO) Subcommittee on
Stability and Load Lines and on Fishing
Vessels Safety (SLF) to be held at the
IMO Headquarters, United Kingdom,
January 16–20, 2012.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Primary Matters To Be Considered
Include
Adoption of the agenda;
Decisions of other IMO bodies;
Development of second generation
intact stability criteria;
Development of guidelines on safe
return to port for passenger ships;
Development of guidelines for
verification of damage stability
requirements for tankers;
Revision of the damage stability
regulations for ro-ro passenger ships;
Development of amendments to
SOLAS chapter II–1 subdivision
standards for cargo ships;
Revision of SOLAS chapter II–1
subdivision and damage stability
regulations;
Development of provisions to ensure
the integrity and uniform
implementation of the 1969 TM
Convention;
Development of amendments to part B
of the 2008 IS Code on towing and
anchor operations;
Consideration of IACS unified
interpretations;
Development of amendments to the
criterion for maximum angle of heel in
turns of the 2008 IS Code;
Development of amendments to
SOLAS regulation II–1/4 concerning
subdivision standards for cargo ships;
Biennial agenda and provisional
agenda for SLF 55;
Election of Chairman and ViceChairman for 2013;
Any other business;
Report to the Maritime Safety
Committee
Members of the public may attend
this meeting up to the seating capacity
of the room. To facilitate the building
security process, and to request
reasonable accommodation, those who
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
plan to attend should contact the
meeting coordinator, LCDR Catherine
Phillips, by email at
Catherine.A.Phillips@uscg.mil, by
phone at (202) 372–1374, by fax at (202)
372–1925, or in writing at Commandant
(CG–5212), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 2nd
Street SW., Stop 7126, Washington, DC
20593–7126 not later than December 1,
2011. Requests made after December 1,
2011 might not be able to be
accommodated. Please note that due to
security considerations, two valid,
government issued photo identifications
must be presented to gain entrance to
the Headquarters building. The
Headquarters building is accessible by
taxi and privately owned conveyance
(public transportation is not generally
available). However, parking in the
vicinity of the building is extremely
limited. Additional information
regarding this and other IMO SHC
public meetings may be found at:
www.uscg.mil/imo.
Dated: November 7, 2011.
Brian Robinson,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating
Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–29326 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1243]
Designation of Administrative Judges
and Delegation of Authority
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) gives notice that
the FAA Administrator has: designated
the Director and Dispute Resolution
Officers of the Office of Dispute
Resolution for Acquisition (ODRA) as
Administrative Judges for all matters
within the ODRA’s jurisdiction; and
delegated authority to the ODRA that
supersedes and replaces previous
delegations of authority. The FAA is
publishing the text of the Designation
and Delegation, executed on October 12,
2011, so that it is available to interested
parties.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marie A. Collins, Dispute Resolution
Officer and Administrative Judge for the
Office of Dispute Resolution for
Acquisition (AGC–70), Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Street SW., Room 323, Washington, DC
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70529
20591; telephone (202) 267–3290;
facsimile (202) 267–3720.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In 1995 Congress, through the
Department of Transportation
Appropriations Act, directed the FAA
‘‘to develop and implement, not later
than April 1, 1996, an acquisition
management system that addressed the
unique needs of the agency and, at a
minimum, provided for more timely and
cost effective acquisitions of equipment
and materials.’’ 1 In response, the FAA
developed the Acquisition Management
System (AMS), a system of policy
guidance for the management of FAA
procurement, and as a part of the AMS,
created the Office of Dispute Resolution
for Acquisition (ODRA) to facilitate the
Administrator’s review of procurement
protests and contract disputes.2
Subsequently, the FAA promulgated
rules of procedure governing the
ODRA’s dispute resolution process by
publishing a final rule entitled,
Procedures for Protests and Contract
Disputes; Amendment of Equal Access
to Justice Act Regulations (effective June
28, 1999).3 In addition to the rules of
procedures, ODRA operates pursuant to
a series of delegations of authority from
the Administrator. Over time, the
authority delegated to the ODRA by the
Administrator expanded to include the
authority of the ODRA Director, among
other things, ‘‘to execute and issue, on
behalf of the Administrator, Orders and
Final Decisions for the Administrator in
all matters’’ under the ODRA’s
jurisdiction valued at not more than $10
Million.4 Congress provided further
confirmation as to the FAA’s dispute
resolution authority in the Vision 100–
Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act
of 2003 (2003 Reauthorization Act),
which expressly provided the ODRA
with exclusive jurisdiction over bid
protests and contract disputes under the
AMS.5 Specifically, the 2003
Reauthorization Act provided at
Subsection (b)(2)(4), under the title
‘‘Adjudication of Certain Bid Protests
and Contract Disputes,’’ that ‘‘[a] bid
protest or contract dispute that is not
addressed or resolved through
alternative dispute resolution shall be
adjudicated by the Administrator,
1 Public Law 104–50, 109 Stat. 436 (November 15,
1995).
2 61 FR 24348; May 14, 1996.
3 64 FR 32926; June 18, 1999.
4 See 63 FR 49151, September 14, 1998; 65 FR
19958–01, April 13, 2000; 69 FR 17469–02, April
2, 2004.
5 See Public Law 108–176, § 224(b), 117 Stat.
2490, 2528 (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C.
40110(d)(4)).
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
70530
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Notices
through Dispute Resolution Officers or
Special Masters of the Federal Aviation
Administration Office of Dispute
Resolution for Acquisition, acting
pursuant to Sections 46102, 46104,
46105, 46106 and 46107 and shall be
subject to judicial review under Section
46110 and Section 504 of Title 5.’’ On
January 12, 2011, the FAA proposed to
update and streamline the ODRA’s
procedural rules by publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register amended Procedures for
Protests and Contracts Dispute (76 FR
2035) which, among other things,
reorganized and streamlined the rules,
and harmonized them with current
statutory and other authority. On
September 7, 2011, the FAA adopted the
proposed rule, publishing it as a final
rule (76 FR 55217) in the Federal
Register, with an effective date of
October 7, 2011. The full text of the
FAA Administrator’s October 12, 2011
Designation and Delegation provides as
follows:
In furtherance of an efficient FAA
acquisition dispute resolution process,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 106(f)(2),
§§ 40101, et seq., 46101, et. seq., 40110
and 14 CFR part 17, I hereby designate
the Director and the Dispute Resolution
Officers of the Office of Dispute
Resolution for Acquisition (‘‘ODRA’’) as
Administrative Judges for all matters
within the ODRA’s jurisdiction and
hereby delegate authority to the ODRA
Director as follows:
a. To administer and conduct
proceedings in individual bid protests,
contract disputes and Circular A–76
contests, to appoint ODRA Dispute
Resolution Officers/Administrative
Judges and Special Masters to
adjudicate all or portions of individual
bid protests, contract disputes and
contests; and to prepare findings and
recommendations as well as proposed
final orders in such cases;
b. To grant or deny dismissal or
summary relief in bid protests, contract
disputes or contests;
c. To stay an award or the
performance of a contract temporarily,
for no more than ten (10) business days,
pending an Administrator’s decision on
a permanent stay. A stay will only be
ordered by the ODRA in cases where the
ODRA, based on the submissions of the
parties, finds compelling reasons which
would justify a stay, and recommends a
stay to the Administrator;
d. To dismiss bid protests, contract
disputes or contests, based on
settlement agreements or voluntary
withdrawals by the parties that
instituted such proceedings;
e. To issue procedural and other
interlocutory orders aimed at proper
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
and efficient case management,
including, without limitation,
scheduling orders, subpoenas, sanctions
orders for failure of discovery, and the
like;
f. To issue protective orders aimed at
prohibiting the public dissemination of
certain information and materials
provided to the ODRA and opposing
parties during the course of bid protest,
contract dispute or contest proceedings,
including, but not limited to, documents
or other materials reflecting trade
secrets, confidential financial
information and other proprietary or
competition-sensitive data, as well as
confidential Agency source selection
information the disclosure of which
might jeopardize future Agency
procurement activities;
g. To utilize voluntary alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) methods as the
primary means of dispute resolution, in
accordance with established Department
of Transportation and FAA policies for
using ADR to the maximum extent
practicable;
h. To appoint ODRA Dispute
Resolution Officers/Administrative
Judges and Special Masters to engage
with parties in voluntary, mutually
agreeable ADR efforts aimed at resolving
acquisition related disputes at the
earliest possible stage, even before any
formal protest, contract dispute or
contest is filed with the ODRA;
i. To execute and issue, on behalf of
the Administrator, final FAA decisions
and orders in all matters within the
ODRA’s jurisdiction, provided that such
matters involve either: (1) A bid protest
concerning an acquisition having a
minimum dollar value of not more than
ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00); or
(2) a contract dispute involving a total
amount to be adjudicated, exclusive of
interest, legal fees or costs, or not more
than ten million dollars
($10,000,000.00). This Delegation does
not preclude the Director of the ODRA
from requesting, in any matter before
the ODRA, that the order setting forth
the final decision of the FAA be
executed by the Administrator;
j. To execute and issue orders and
final decisions on behalf of the
Administrator for any applications
made pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act for matters within the
ODRA’s jurisdiction;
k. To take all other reasonable steps
deemed necessary and proper for the
management of the FAA Dispute
Resolution System and for the
resolution of bid protests, contract
disputes, or contests, in accordance
with the Acquisition Management
System and applicable law.
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The foregoing authority may be redelegated by the Director to ODRA
Dispute Resolution Officers/
Administrative Judges and to Special
Masters. This Delegation supersedes and
replaces the Delegations issued to the
Director of the ODRA on July 29, 1998,
March 27, 2000, March 10, 2004
(Delegation), March 10, 2004 (OMB
Circular A–76 Delegation), and March
31, 2010.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 12,
2011.
Marc L. Warren,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–29336 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Suspension of Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Replacement General
Aviation Airport, Mesquite, Clark
County, NV
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of suspension of
preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) as the Lead
Agency for the proposed project is
issuing this notice to advise the public
the FAA has suspended preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for a proposed Replacement
General Aviation (GA) Airport in
Mesquite, Clark County, Nevada. The
FAA received a letter dated September
27, 2011, from the City of Mesquite,
Nevada asking the FAA to suspend any
further work on the EIS. The reasons for
this action include the local economic
conditions in Mesquite and other local
fiscal and budgetary constraints.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David B. Kessler, AICP, Regional
Environmental Protection Specialist,
AWP–610.1, Airports Division, Federal
Aviation Administration, WesternPacific Region, P.O. Box 92007, Los
Angeles, California 90009–2007,
Telephone: 310/725–3615.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 8, 2004, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of
Intent in the Federal Register (69 FR
71097) to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed
construction and operation of a
proposed Replacement General Aviation
(GA) Airport, for the City of Mesquite in
eastern Clark County, Nevada. The City
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70529-70530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29336]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1243]
Designation of Administrative Judges and Delegation of Authority
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) gives notice that
the FAA Administrator has: designated the Director and Dispute
Resolution Officers of the Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition
(ODRA) as Administrative Judges for all matters within the ODRA's
jurisdiction; and delegated authority to the ODRA that supersedes and
replaces previous delegations of authority. The FAA is publishing the
text of the Designation and Delegation, executed on October 12, 2011,
so that it is available to interested parties.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marie A. Collins, Dispute Resolution
Officer and Administrative Judge for the Office of Dispute Resolution
for Acquisition (AGC-70), Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Street SW., Room 323, Washington, DC 20591; telephone
(202) 267-3290; facsimile (202) 267-3720.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In 1995 Congress, through the Department of Transportation
Appropriations Act, directed the FAA ``to develop and implement, not
later than April 1, 1996, an acquisition management system that
addressed the unique needs of the agency and, at a minimum, provided
for more timely and cost effective acquisitions of equipment and
materials.'' \1\ In response, the FAA developed the Acquisition
Management System (AMS), a system of policy guidance for the management
of FAA procurement, and as a part of the AMS, created the Office of
Dispute Resolution for Acquisition (ODRA) to facilitate the
Administrator's review of procurement protests and contract
disputes.\2\ Subsequently, the FAA promulgated rules of procedure
governing the ODRA's dispute resolution process by publishing a final
rule entitled, Procedures for Protests and Contract Disputes; Amendment
of Equal Access to Justice Act Regulations (effective June 28,
1999).\3\ In addition to the rules of procedures, ODRA operates
pursuant to a series of delegations of authority from the
Administrator. Over time, the authority delegated to the ODRA by the
Administrator expanded to include the authority of the ODRA Director,
among other things, ``to execute and issue, on behalf of the
Administrator, Orders and Final Decisions for the Administrator in all
matters'' under the ODRA's jurisdiction valued at not more than $10
Million.\4\ Congress provided further confirmation as to the FAA's
dispute resolution authority in the Vision 100-Century of Aviation
Reauthorization Act of 2003 (2003 Reauthorization Act), which expressly
provided the ODRA with exclusive jurisdiction over bid protests and
contract disputes under the AMS.\5\ Specifically, the 2003
Reauthorization Act provided at Subsection (b)(2)(4), under the title
``Adjudication of Certain Bid Protests and Contract Disputes,'' that
``[a] bid protest or contract dispute that is not addressed or resolved
through alternative dispute resolution shall be adjudicated by the
Administrator,
[[Page 70530]]
through Dispute Resolution Officers or Special Masters of the Federal
Aviation Administration Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition,
acting pursuant to Sections 46102, 46104, 46105, 46106 and 46107 and
shall be subject to judicial review under Section 46110 and Section 504
of Title 5.'' On January 12, 2011, the FAA proposed to update and
streamline the ODRA's procedural rules by publishing a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register amended Procedures for
Protests and Contracts Dispute (76 FR 2035) which, among other things,
reorganized and streamlined the rules, and harmonized them with current
statutory and other authority. On September 7, 2011, the FAA adopted
the proposed rule, publishing it as a final rule (76 FR 55217) in the
Federal Register, with an effective date of October 7, 2011. The full
text of the FAA Administrator's October 12, 2011 Designation and
Delegation provides as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 104-50, 109 Stat. 436 (November 15, 1995).
\2\ 61 FR 24348; May 14, 1996.
\3\ 64 FR 32926; June 18, 1999.
\4\ See 63 FR 49151, September 14, 1998; 65 FR 19958-01, April
13, 2000; 69 FR 17469-02, April 2, 2004.
\5\ See Public Law 108-176, Sec. 224(b), 117 Stat. 2490, 2528
(codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. 40110(d)(4)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In furtherance of an efficient FAA acquisition dispute resolution
process, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 106(f)(2), Sec. Sec. 40101, et seq.,
46101, et. seq., 40110 and 14 CFR part 17, I hereby designate the
Director and the Dispute Resolution Officers of the Office of Dispute
Resolution for Acquisition (``ODRA'') as Administrative Judges for all
matters within the ODRA's jurisdiction and hereby delegate authority to
the ODRA Director as follows:
a. To administer and conduct proceedings in individual bid
protests, contract disputes and Circular A-76 contests, to appoint ODRA
Dispute Resolution Officers/Administrative Judges and Special Masters
to adjudicate all or portions of individual bid protests, contract
disputes and contests; and to prepare findings and recommendations as
well as proposed final orders in such cases;
b. To grant or deny dismissal or summary relief in bid protests,
contract disputes or contests;
c. To stay an award or the performance of a contract temporarily,
for no more than ten (10) business days, pending an Administrator's
decision on a permanent stay. A stay will only be ordered by the ODRA
in cases where the ODRA, based on the submissions of the parties, finds
compelling reasons which would justify a stay, and recommends a stay to
the Administrator;
d. To dismiss bid protests, contract disputes or contests, based on
settlement agreements or voluntary withdrawals by the parties that
instituted such proceedings;
e. To issue procedural and other interlocutory orders aimed at
proper and efficient case management, including, without limitation,
scheduling orders, subpoenas, sanctions orders for failure of
discovery, and the like;
f. To issue protective orders aimed at prohibiting the public
dissemination of certain information and materials provided to the ODRA
and opposing parties during the course of bid protest, contract dispute
or contest proceedings, including, but not limited to, documents or
other materials reflecting trade secrets, confidential financial
information and other proprietary or competition-sensitive data, as
well as confidential Agency source selection information the disclosure
of which might jeopardize future Agency procurement activities;
g. To utilize voluntary alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
methods as the primary means of dispute resolution, in accordance with
established Department of Transportation and FAA policies for using ADR
to the maximum extent practicable;
h. To appoint ODRA Dispute Resolution Officers/Administrative
Judges and Special Masters to engage with parties in voluntary,
mutually agreeable ADR efforts aimed at resolving acquisition related
disputes at the earliest possible stage, even before any formal
protest, contract dispute or contest is filed with the ODRA;
i. To execute and issue, on behalf of the Administrator, final FAA
decisions and orders in all matters within the ODRA's jurisdiction,
provided that such matters involve either: (1) A bid protest concerning
an acquisition having a minimum dollar value of not more than ten
million dollars ($10,000,000.00); or (2) a contract dispute involving a
total amount to be adjudicated, exclusive of interest, legal fees or
costs, or not more than ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00). This
Delegation does not preclude the Director of the ODRA from requesting,
in any matter before the ODRA, that the order setting forth the final
decision of the FAA be executed by the Administrator;
j. To execute and issue orders and final decisions on behalf of the
Administrator for any applications made pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act for matters within the ODRA's jurisdiction;
k. To take all other reasonable steps deemed necessary and proper
for the management of the FAA Dispute Resolution System and for the
resolution of bid protests, contract disputes, or contests, in
accordance with the Acquisition Management System and applicable law.
The foregoing authority may be re-delegated by the Director to ODRA
Dispute Resolution Officers/Administrative Judges and to Special
Masters. This Delegation supersedes and replaces the Delegations issued
to the Director of the ODRA on July 29, 1998, March 27, 2000, March 10,
2004 (Delegation), March 10, 2004 (OMB Circular A-76 Delegation), and
March 31, 2010.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 12, 2011.
Marc L. Warren,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-29336 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P