Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Amendment 13 to the Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery Management Plan; Annual Catch Limits, 70362-70364 [2011-29309]
Download as PDF
70362
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 110606318–1655–02]
RIN 0648–BA68
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Amendment 13 to the Coastal Pelagic
Species Fishery Management Plan;
Annual Catch Limits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this final rule to
implement Amendment 13 to the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). This final rule
implements parts of Amendment 13 to
the CPS FMP, which is intended to
ensure the FMP is consistent with
advisory guidelines published in
Federal regulations. Amendment 13
revised the framework process in place
to set and adjust fishery specifications
and management measures and
modified this framework to include new
specification reference points such as
annual catch limit (ACL).
DATES: Effective December 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the CPS FMP as
Amended through Amendment 13 and
the Environmental Assessment/
Regulatory Impact Review for
Amendment 13, are available from
Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802, or Donald
O. McIssac, Executive Director, Pacific
Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE.
Ambassador Place, Suite 200, Portland,
OR 97220–1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua B. Lindsay, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, NMFS, at (562) 980–4034 or
Mike Burner, Pacific Fishery
Management Council, at (503) 820–
2280.
SUMMARY:
The CPS
fishery in the U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) off the West Coast is
managed under the CPS FMP, which
was developed by the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA). Species managed under the
CPS FMP include Pacific sardine,
Pacific mackerel, jack mackerel,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
northern anchovy, market squid and
krill. The CPS FMP was approved by the
Secretary of Commerce and was
implemented by regulations that can be
found at 50 CFR part 660, subpart I.
The MSA was amended in 2007 to
include new requirements for ACLs and
accountability measures (AMs) and
other provisions regarding preventing
and ending overfishing and rebuilding
fisheries. On February 17, 2009, NMFS
revised its guidelines implementing
MSA National Standard 1 (January 16,
2009; 74 FR 3178) in response to these
changes in the MSA. The revised
guidelines explain NOAA’s
interpretation of the new statutory
requirements for specifying ACLs at
such levels that overfishing does not
occur and that measures be taken to
ensure accountability with these limits.
The purpose of Amendment 13 is to
amend the CPS FMP to comply with
certain provisions in those revised
advisory guidelines and to comply with
the new requirement to establish a
process for setting ACLs and AMs.
Specifically, Amendment 13 revised the
framework process to set and adjust
fishery specification and management
measures, and established a framework
for specifying new reference points such
as ACLs and AMs, as well as other
provisions for preventing overfishing
such as the potential setting of annual
catch targets (ACTs).
Additionally, Amendment 13
amended the FMP to better account for
scientific and management uncertainty
and to prevent overfishing through the
following measures:
• Modify the existing harvest control
rules for actively managed species
(Pacific sardine and Pacific mackerel) to
include a buffer or reduction in
acceptable biological catch (ABC)
relative to overfishing limit (OFL) to
account for scientific uncertainty. This
buffer will be recommended during the
annual management cycle through a
combination of scientific advice from
the Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) and a policy determination of the
Council.
• Maintain the default harvest control
rules for monitored stocks (jack
mackerel, northern anchovy and market
squid) but modified as necessary to
specify the new management reference
points. ACLs would likely be specified
for multiple years until such time as the
species becomes actively managed or
new scientific information becomes
available. The current buffer of a 75percent reduction in the ABC control
rule (ABC equals 25 percent of OFL/
MSY) will remain in use until
recommended for modification by the
SSC and by the Council through the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
annual harvest and management
specification process and approved by
NMFS.
• Add a mechanism for the use of
sector-specific ACLs, ACTs and AMs.
Although not a change to the FMP, the
Council reaffirmed that all management
unit species (MUS) currently in the
FMP, including those species
categorized as monitored species and
prohibited harvest species (krill) are ‘‘in
the fishery’’ and will remain as MUS.
Amendment 13 also adds Pacific herring
(Clupea pallasii pallasii) and jacksmelt
(Atherinopsis californiensis) to the FMP
as ecosystem component (EC) species.
Although the incidental catch of these
species within CPS fisheries is
extremely small, the intent of this action
is to continue to specifically monitor the
catches of these species and report catch
estimates in the annual Stock
Assessment and Fishery Evaluation
report along with other incidental catch.
In addition to the current ecological
considerations in the FMP, the
amendment also specifies that the
Council will include ecological
considerations when reviewing and/or
adopting status determination criteria
(SDCs), ACLs, and ACTs.
No substantive changes have been
made to this rule from the proposed rule
stage and no changes have been made to
the regulatory text from the proposed
rule.
On June 28, 2011 NMFS published a
proposed rule for Amendment 13
soliciting public comments (76 FR 124).
NMFS received two letters regarding the
proposed rule to implement
Amendment 13, including a letter of
‘‘no comment’’ submitted by U.S.
Department of the Interior and one from
two non-governmental organizations
(NGO) that is addressed below.
Comment 1: The majority of the
points raised in the NGO comment
related more to the CPS FMP as whole
as opposed to specific changes being
made by Amendment 13, and will not
be addressed here. However, NMFS
found the comments valuable and will
consider them for future management
planning, and will respond directly to
the commenters about their concerns
regarding matters outside the scope of
this rulemaking. With regard to
Amendment 13 and/or its implementing
regulations the comment stated that
revised ABC control rules for the
actively managed stocks (Pacific sardine
and Pacific mackerel) failed to properly
articulate or provide an adequate buffer
for scientific uncertainty with respect to
OFL levels. Also with regard to the
framework measures in Amendment 13
the comment stated that new framework
for determining overfishing and the
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
formula for calculating OFL for actively
managed species allows CPS to be
harvest at levels higher than previously
allowed and provides for less
precautionary management than under
the old framework. Specific to the
regulations implementing Amendment
13, the comment also stated that the
revised definition of a ‘‘harvest
guideline’’ is not clear with respect to
how it compares to an ACT. The
comment also stated that an
Environment Impact Statement (EIS)
should have been prepared instead of an
Environmental Assessment, that a wider
range of alternatives should have been
analyzed, and that proper scoping or a
process for providing public comment
did not occur.
Response: NMFS believes the revised
framework for ABC that uses a P*, or
probability of overfishing
determination, provides for an
appropriate way to incorporate
scientific uncertainty in the OFL to
buffer against overfishing (i.e.,
exceeding the OFL). The ABC will be
recommended to NMFS by the Council
based on its preferred level of risk
aversion. The ABC is based on a
percentage reduction of the OFL as
determined by an SSC determination on
scientific uncertainty and a risk policy
determined by the Council. In cases
where scientific uncertainty (s)
associated with estimating an OFL is
quantified by the SSC, the percentage
reduction that defines the scientific
uncertainty buffer and the ABC can be
determined by translating the estimated
s to a range of probability of overfishing
(P*) values. The Council then selects a
level of risk aversion by choosing an
appropriate P* value. Each P* value is
then matched to its corresponding
BUFFER fraction that is applied to the
OFL according to the ABC control rule.
Under Amendment 13 overfishing
will be determined for the finfish stocks
based on new OFL formulas and not
based on the existing ABC or harvest
guideline (HG) formulas. Based on the
guidance in the revised NS 1 guidelines
the harvest levels that resulted from the
existing ABC/HG formulas were more
analogous to ACL or ACT type levels as
opposed to OFL levels. Within the new
Amendment 13 framework, OFLs
correspond with MSY levels which are
in concert with the relationship between
OFL, ABC and ACL described in the
guidelines. Additionally, the maximum
allowable catch levels (ACLs and
associated ACTs), will still be set based
on the same conservative formulas and
principles that exist in the CPS FMP.
These levels will be considered in
conjunction with ABC control rules to
prevent overfishing.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
With regard to the definitions of
‘‘harvest guideline’’ and ACT, the CPS
FMP previously used the setting of
harvest guidelines (HGs) in a similar
way as to how ACTs are defined, as a
management target. Because ACTs are
an optional reference point and HGs
were already in the FMP, NMFS
decided to maintain the term HG for
consistency purposes while recognizing
that HGs will be used with the same
objective as ACTs, to prevent the ACL
from being exceeded.
Regarding the comments about the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis for Amendment 13, the
EA showed that the implementation and
adoption of Amendment 13 will not
significantly adversely impact the
quality of the human environment.
Therefore an EIS is not necessary to
comply with NEPA for this action. With
regard to the range of alternatives,
NMFS believes a reasonable number of
alternatives were analyzed based on the
nature of this action. Additionally, the
alternatives analyzed were all
reasonable, would all meet the purpose
and need of the action, and were all
objectively evaluated. The public had
several opportunities to provide input
on the development of the proposed
action and EA. The Council process,
which is based on stakeholder
involvement, provides opportunities for
public input on scoping and public
comment on fishery management
proposals during Council,
subcommittee, and advisory body
meetings. Meetings of the Council and
its advisory bodies constitute the
scoping process, involving the
development of alternatives and
consideration of the impacts of the
alternatives: all meetings are announced
in advance, and welcome public
attendance and comments. Specifically
the public had opportunity to provide
input into this action and EA during the
March and November 2009, and March
and June 2010, Pacific Council
meetings. Additionally, NMFS
published a Federal Register notice on
June 8, 2011, that announced the
availability of the Amendment and draft
EA and comments on the draft EA were
accepted until August 8, 2011,
providing the public 60 days to submit
comments on the EA.
Classification
The Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, determined that the Amendment
13 is necessary for the conservation and
management of the CPS fishery and that
it is consistent with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and other applicable
laws.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70363
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the
certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding
this certification. As a result, a
regulatory flexibility analysis was not
required and none was prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives,
Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 8, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part
660 as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. Amend § 660.502 by removing the
definition of ‘‘Monitored species (MS)’’
and revising the definition of ‘‘Harvest
guideline’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 660.502
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Harvest guideline means a specified
numerical harvest objective that is not a
quota. Attainment of a harvest guideline
does not require complete closure of a
fishery. It is operationally similar to an
Annual Catch Target (ACT) (as defined
at § 600.310(f)(2) of this chapter).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 660.508 to read as follows:
§ 660.508
Annual specifications.
(a) The Regional Administrator will
determine any harvest guideline, quota,
Annual Catch Limit (ACL) (defined at
§ 600.310(f)(2)) or Annual Catch Target
(ACT) (defined at § 600.310(f)(2) of this
chapter) in accordance with the
framework process in the FMP.
(b) Any harvest guideline, quota, ACL,
or ACT, including any apportionment
between the directed fishery and set-
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
70364
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
aside for incidental harvest, will be
published in the Federal Register.
(c) The announcement of each harvest
guideline, quota, ACL or ACT will
contain the following information if
available or applicable:
(1) The estimated biomass or MSY
proxy on which the harvest guideline,
quota, ACL or ACT was determined;
(2) The portion, if appropriate, of the
harvest guideline, quota, ACL or ACT
set aside to allow for incidental harvests
after closure of the directed fishery;
(3) The estimated level of the
incidental trip limit that will be allowed
after the directed fishery is closed; and
(4) The allocation, if appropriate,
between Subarea A and Subarea B.
(d) As necessary, harvest guidelines,
quotas, OFLs (defined at § 600.310(f)(2)),
ABCs (defined at § 600.310(f)(2) of this
chapter), ACLs or ACTs, will receive
public review according to the following
procedure:
(1) Meetings will be held by the
Council’s CPSMT and AP, where the
estimated biomass and/or other
biological or management benchmarks
will be reviewed and public comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
received. Each of these meetings will be
announced in the Federal Register
before the date of the meeting, if
possible.
(2) All materials relating to the
estimated biomass and/or other
biological or management benchmarks
will be forwarded to the Council and its
Scientific and Statistical Committee and
will be available to the public from the
Regional Administrator when available.
(3) At a regular meeting of the
Council, the Council will review the
estimated biomass and/or other
biological or management benchmarks
and offer time for public comment. If
the Council requests a revision,
justification must be provided.
(4) The Regional Administrator will
review the Council’s recommendations,
justification, and public comments and
base his or her final decision on the
requirements of the FMP and other
applicable law.
■
4. Revise § 660.509 to read as follows:
PO 00000
§ 660.509 Accountability measures
(season closures).
(a) General rule. When the directed
fishery allocation or incidental
allocation is reached for any CPS
species it shall be closed until the
beginning of the next fishing period or
season. Regional Administrator shall
announce in the Federal Register the
date of such closure, as well as any
incidental harvest level(s)
recommended by the Council and
approved by NMFS.
(b) Pacific Sardine. When the
allocation and reallocation levels for
Pacific sardine in § 660.511(f) through
(h) are reached, the Pacific sardine
fishery shall be closed until either it reopens per the allocation scheme in
§ 660.511(g) and (h) or the beginning of
the next fishing season as stated in
§ 660.510(a). The Regional
Administrator shall announce in the
Federal Register the date of the closure
of the directed fishery for Pacific
sardine.
[FR Doc. 2011–29309 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\14NOR1.SGM
14NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70362-70364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29309]
[[Page 70362]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 110606318-1655-02]
RIN 0648-BA68
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species
Fisheries; Amendment 13 to the Coastal Pelagic Species Fishery
Management Plan; Annual Catch Limits
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to implement Amendment 13 to the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP). This final
rule implements parts of Amendment 13 to the CPS FMP, which is intended
to ensure the FMP is consistent with advisory guidelines published in
Federal regulations. Amendment 13 revised the framework process in
place to set and adjust fishery specifications and management measures
and modified this framework to include new specification reference
points such as annual catch limit (ACL).
DATES: Effective December 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the CPS FMP as Amended through Amendment 13 and
the Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review for Amendment 13,
are available from Rodney R. McInnis, Regional Administrator, Southwest
Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802,
or Donald O. McIssac, Executive Director, Pacific Fishery Management
Council, 7700 NE. Ambassador Place, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97220-1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua B. Lindsay, Sustainable
Fisheries Division, NMFS, at (562) 980-4034 or Mike Burner, Pacific
Fishery Management Council, at (503) 820-2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CPS fishery in the U.S. exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off the West Coast is managed under the CPS FMP,
which was developed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council)
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA). Species managed under the CPS FMP include Pacific sardine,
Pacific mackerel, jack mackerel, northern anchovy, market squid and
krill. The CPS FMP was approved by the Secretary of Commerce and was
implemented by regulations that can be found at 50 CFR part 660,
subpart I.
The MSA was amended in 2007 to include new requirements for ACLs
and accountability measures (AMs) and other provisions regarding
preventing and ending overfishing and rebuilding fisheries. On February
17, 2009, NMFS revised its guidelines implementing MSA National
Standard 1 (January 16, 2009; 74 FR 3178) in response to these changes
in the MSA. The revised guidelines explain NOAA's interpretation of the
new statutory requirements for specifying ACLs at such levels that
overfishing does not occur and that measures be taken to ensure
accountability with these limits. The purpose of Amendment 13 is to
amend the CPS FMP to comply with certain provisions in those revised
advisory guidelines and to comply with the new requirement to establish
a process for setting ACLs and AMs. Specifically, Amendment 13 revised
the framework process to set and adjust fishery specification and
management measures, and established a framework for specifying new
reference points such as ACLs and AMs, as well as other provisions for
preventing overfishing such as the potential setting of annual catch
targets (ACTs).
Additionally, Amendment 13 amended the FMP to better account for
scientific and management uncertainty and to prevent overfishing
through the following measures:
Modify the existing harvest control rules for actively
managed species (Pacific sardine and Pacific mackerel) to include a
buffer or reduction in acceptable biological catch (ABC) relative to
overfishing limit (OFL) to account for scientific uncertainty. This
buffer will be recommended during the annual management cycle through a
combination of scientific advice from the Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC) and a policy determination of the Council.
Maintain the default harvest control rules for monitored
stocks (jack mackerel, northern anchovy and market squid) but modified
as necessary to specify the new management reference points. ACLs would
likely be specified for multiple years until such time as the species
becomes actively managed or new scientific information becomes
available. The current buffer of a 75-percent reduction in the ABC
control rule (ABC equals 25 percent of OFL/MSY) will remain in use
until recommended for modification by the SSC and by the Council
through the annual harvest and management specification process and
approved by NMFS.
Add a mechanism for the use of sector-specific ACLs, ACTs
and AMs. Although not a change to the FMP, the Council reaffirmed that
all management unit species (MUS) currently in the FMP, including those
species categorized as monitored species and prohibited harvest species
(krill) are ``in the fishery'' and will remain as MUS. Amendment 13
also adds Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii pallasii) and jacksmelt
(Atherinopsis californiensis) to the FMP as ecosystem component (EC)
species. Although the incidental catch of these species within CPS
fisheries is extremely small, the intent of this action is to continue
to specifically monitor the catches of these species and report catch
estimates in the annual Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation report
along with other incidental catch. In addition to the current
ecological considerations in the FMP, the amendment also specifies that
the Council will include ecological considerations when reviewing and/
or adopting status determination criteria (SDCs), ACLs, and ACTs.
No substantive changes have been made to this rule from the
proposed rule stage and no changes have been made to the regulatory
text from the proposed rule.
On June 28, 2011 NMFS published a proposed rule for Amendment 13
soliciting public comments (76 FR 124). NMFS received two letters
regarding the proposed rule to implement Amendment 13, including a
letter of ``no comment'' submitted by U.S. Department of the Interior
and one from two non-governmental organizations (NGO) that is addressed
below.
Comment 1: The majority of the points raised in the NGO comment
related more to the CPS FMP as whole as opposed to specific changes
being made by Amendment 13, and will not be addressed here. However,
NMFS found the comments valuable and will consider them for future
management planning, and will respond directly to the commenters about
their concerns regarding matters outside the scope of this rulemaking.
With regard to Amendment 13 and/or its implementing regulations the
comment stated that revised ABC control rules for the actively managed
stocks (Pacific sardine and Pacific mackerel) failed to properly
articulate or provide an adequate buffer for scientific uncertainty
with respect to OFL levels. Also with regard to the framework measures
in Amendment 13 the comment stated that new framework for determining
overfishing and the
[[Page 70363]]
formula for calculating OFL for actively managed species allows CPS to
be harvest at levels higher than previously allowed and provides for
less precautionary management than under the old framework. Specific to
the regulations implementing Amendment 13, the comment also stated that
the revised definition of a ``harvest guideline'' is not clear with
respect to how it compares to an ACT. The comment also stated that an
Environment Impact Statement (EIS) should have been prepared instead of
an Environmental Assessment, that a wider range of alternatives should
have been analyzed, and that proper scoping or a process for providing
public comment did not occur.
Response: NMFS believes the revised framework for ABC that uses a
P*, or probability of overfishing determination, provides for an
appropriate way to incorporate scientific uncertainty in the OFL to
buffer against overfishing (i.e., exceeding the OFL). The ABC will be
recommended to NMFS by the Council based on its preferred level of risk
aversion. The ABC is based on a percentage reduction of the OFL as
determined by an SSC determination on scientific uncertainty and a risk
policy determined by the Council. In cases where scientific uncertainty
([sigma]) associated with estimating an OFL is quantified by the SSC,
the percentage reduction that defines the scientific uncertainty buffer
and the ABC can be determined by translating the estimated [sigma] to a
range of probability of overfishing (P*) values. The Council then
selects a level of risk aversion by choosing an appropriate P* value.
Each P* value is then matched to its corresponding BUFFER fraction that
is applied to the OFL according to the ABC control rule.
Under Amendment 13 overfishing will be determined for the finfish
stocks based on new OFL formulas and not based on the existing ABC or
harvest guideline (HG) formulas. Based on the guidance in the revised
NS 1 guidelines the harvest levels that resulted from the existing ABC/
HG formulas were more analogous to ACL or ACT type levels as opposed to
OFL levels. Within the new Amendment 13 framework, OFLs correspond with
MSY levels which are in concert with the relationship between OFL, ABC
and ACL described in the guidelines. Additionally, the maximum
allowable catch levels (ACLs and associated ACTs), will still be set
based on the same conservative formulas and principles that exist in
the CPS FMP. These levels will be considered in conjunction with ABC
control rules to prevent overfishing.
With regard to the definitions of ``harvest guideline'' and ACT,
the CPS FMP previously used the setting of harvest guidelines (HGs) in
a similar way as to how ACTs are defined, as a management target.
Because ACTs are an optional reference point and HGs were already in
the FMP, NMFS decided to maintain the term HG for consistency purposes
while recognizing that HGs will be used with the same objective as
ACTs, to prevent the ACL from being exceeded.
Regarding the comments about the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis for Amendment 13, the EA showed that the implementation
and adoption of Amendment 13 will not significantly adversely impact
the quality of the human environment. Therefore an EIS is not necessary
to comply with NEPA for this action. With regard to the range of
alternatives, NMFS believes a reasonable number of alternatives were
analyzed based on the nature of this action. Additionally, the
alternatives analyzed were all reasonable, would all meet the purpose
and need of the action, and were all objectively evaluated. The public
had several opportunities to provide input on the development of the
proposed action and EA. The Council process, which is based on
stakeholder involvement, provides opportunities for public input on
scoping and public comment on fishery management proposals during
Council, subcommittee, and advisory body meetings. Meetings of the
Council and its advisory bodies constitute the scoping process,
involving the development of alternatives and consideration of the
impacts of the alternatives: all meetings are announced in advance, and
welcome public attendance and comments. Specifically the public had
opportunity to provide input into this action and EA during the March
and November 2009, and March and June 2010, Pacific Council meetings.
Additionally, NMFS published a Federal Register notice on June 8, 2011,
that announced the availability of the Amendment and draft EA and
comments on the draft EA were accepted until August 8, 2011, providing
the public 60 days to submit comments on the EA.
Classification
The Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, determined that the
Amendment 13 is necessary for the conservation and management of the
CPS fishery and that it is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding this certification. As a
result, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not required and none was
prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives, Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 8, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part
660 as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 660.502 by removing the definition of ``Monitored
species (MS)'' and revising the definition of ``Harvest guideline'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 660.502 Definitions.
* * * * *
Harvest guideline means a specified numerical harvest objective
that is not a quota. Attainment of a harvest guideline does not require
complete closure of a fishery. It is operationally similar to an Annual
Catch Target (ACT) (as defined at Sec. 600.310(f)(2) of this chapter).
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 660.508 to read as follows:
Sec. 660.508 Annual specifications.
(a) The Regional Administrator will determine any harvest
guideline, quota, Annual Catch Limit (ACL) (defined at Sec.
600.310(f)(2)) or Annual Catch Target (ACT) (defined at Sec.
600.310(f)(2) of this chapter) in accordance with the framework process
in the FMP.
(b) Any harvest guideline, quota, ACL, or ACT, including any
apportionment between the directed fishery and set-
[[Page 70364]]
aside for incidental harvest, will be published in the Federal
Register.
(c) The announcement of each harvest guideline, quota, ACL or ACT
will contain the following information if available or applicable:
(1) The estimated biomass or MSY proxy on which the harvest
guideline, quota, ACL or ACT was determined;
(2) The portion, if appropriate, of the harvest guideline, quota,
ACL or ACT set aside to allow for incidental harvests after closure of
the directed fishery;
(3) The estimated level of the incidental trip limit that will be
allowed after the directed fishery is closed; and
(4) The allocation, if appropriate, between Subarea A and Subarea
B.
(d) As necessary, harvest guidelines, quotas, OFLs (defined at
Sec. 600.310(f)(2)), ABCs (defined at Sec. 600.310(f)(2) of this
chapter), ACLs or ACTs, will receive public review according to the
following procedure:
(1) Meetings will be held by the Council's CPSMT and AP, where the
estimated biomass and/or other biological or management benchmarks will
be reviewed and public comments received. Each of these meetings will
be announced in the Federal Register before the date of the meeting, if
possible.
(2) All materials relating to the estimated biomass and/or other
biological or management benchmarks will be forwarded to the Council
and its Scientific and Statistical Committee and will be available to
the public from the Regional Administrator when available.
(3) At a regular meeting of the Council, the Council will review
the estimated biomass and/or other biological or management benchmarks
and offer time for public comment. If the Council requests a revision,
justification must be provided.
(4) The Regional Administrator will review the Council's
recommendations, justification, and public comments and base his or her
final decision on the requirements of the FMP and other applicable law.
0
4. Revise Sec. 660.509 to read as follows:
Sec. 660.509 Accountability measures (season closures).
(a) General rule. When the directed fishery allocation or
incidental allocation is reached for any CPS species it shall be closed
until the beginning of the next fishing period or season. Regional
Administrator shall announce in the Federal Register the date of such
closure, as well as any incidental harvest level(s) recommended by the
Council and approved by NMFS.
(b) Pacific Sardine. When the allocation and reallocation levels
for Pacific sardine in Sec. 660.511(f) through (h) are reached, the
Pacific sardine fishery shall be closed until either it re-opens per
the allocation scheme in Sec. 660.511(g) and (h) or the beginning of
the next fishing season as stated in Sec. 660.510(a). The Regional
Administrator shall announce in the Federal Register the date of the
closure of the directed fishery for Pacific sardine.
[FR Doc. 2011-29309 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P