Suspension of Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Replacement General Aviation Airport, Mesquite, Clark County, NV, 70530-70531 [2011-29269]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
70530
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Notices
through Dispute Resolution Officers or
Special Masters of the Federal Aviation
Administration Office of Dispute
Resolution for Acquisition, acting
pursuant to Sections 46102, 46104,
46105, 46106 and 46107 and shall be
subject to judicial review under Section
46110 and Section 504 of Title 5.’’ On
January 12, 2011, the FAA proposed to
update and streamline the ODRA’s
procedural rules by publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register amended Procedures for
Protests and Contracts Dispute (76 FR
2035) which, among other things,
reorganized and streamlined the rules,
and harmonized them with current
statutory and other authority. On
September 7, 2011, the FAA adopted the
proposed rule, publishing it as a final
rule (76 FR 55217) in the Federal
Register, with an effective date of
October 7, 2011. The full text of the
FAA Administrator’s October 12, 2011
Designation and Delegation provides as
follows:
In furtherance of an efficient FAA
acquisition dispute resolution process,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 106(f)(2),
§§ 40101, et seq., 46101, et. seq., 40110
and 14 CFR part 17, I hereby designate
the Director and the Dispute Resolution
Officers of the Office of Dispute
Resolution for Acquisition (‘‘ODRA’’) as
Administrative Judges for all matters
within the ODRA’s jurisdiction and
hereby delegate authority to the ODRA
Director as follows:
a. To administer and conduct
proceedings in individual bid protests,
contract disputes and Circular A–76
contests, to appoint ODRA Dispute
Resolution Officers/Administrative
Judges and Special Masters to
adjudicate all or portions of individual
bid protests, contract disputes and
contests; and to prepare findings and
recommendations as well as proposed
final orders in such cases;
b. To grant or deny dismissal or
summary relief in bid protests, contract
disputes or contests;
c. To stay an award or the
performance of a contract temporarily,
for no more than ten (10) business days,
pending an Administrator’s decision on
a permanent stay. A stay will only be
ordered by the ODRA in cases where the
ODRA, based on the submissions of the
parties, finds compelling reasons which
would justify a stay, and recommends a
stay to the Administrator;
d. To dismiss bid protests, contract
disputes or contests, based on
settlement agreements or voluntary
withdrawals by the parties that
instituted such proceedings;
e. To issue procedural and other
interlocutory orders aimed at proper
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
and efficient case management,
including, without limitation,
scheduling orders, subpoenas, sanctions
orders for failure of discovery, and the
like;
f. To issue protective orders aimed at
prohibiting the public dissemination of
certain information and materials
provided to the ODRA and opposing
parties during the course of bid protest,
contract dispute or contest proceedings,
including, but not limited to, documents
or other materials reflecting trade
secrets, confidential financial
information and other proprietary or
competition-sensitive data, as well as
confidential Agency source selection
information the disclosure of which
might jeopardize future Agency
procurement activities;
g. To utilize voluntary alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) methods as the
primary means of dispute resolution, in
accordance with established Department
of Transportation and FAA policies for
using ADR to the maximum extent
practicable;
h. To appoint ODRA Dispute
Resolution Officers/Administrative
Judges and Special Masters to engage
with parties in voluntary, mutually
agreeable ADR efforts aimed at resolving
acquisition related disputes at the
earliest possible stage, even before any
formal protest, contract dispute or
contest is filed with the ODRA;
i. To execute and issue, on behalf of
the Administrator, final FAA decisions
and orders in all matters within the
ODRA’s jurisdiction, provided that such
matters involve either: (1) A bid protest
concerning an acquisition having a
minimum dollar value of not more than
ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00); or
(2) a contract dispute involving a total
amount to be adjudicated, exclusive of
interest, legal fees or costs, or not more
than ten million dollars
($10,000,000.00). This Delegation does
not preclude the Director of the ODRA
from requesting, in any matter before
the ODRA, that the order setting forth
the final decision of the FAA be
executed by the Administrator;
j. To execute and issue orders and
final decisions on behalf of the
Administrator for any applications
made pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act for matters within the
ODRA’s jurisdiction;
k. To take all other reasonable steps
deemed necessary and proper for the
management of the FAA Dispute
Resolution System and for the
resolution of bid protests, contract
disputes, or contests, in accordance
with the Acquisition Management
System and applicable law.
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The foregoing authority may be redelegated by the Director to ODRA
Dispute Resolution Officers/
Administrative Judges and to Special
Masters. This Delegation supersedes and
replaces the Delegations issued to the
Director of the ODRA on July 29, 1998,
March 27, 2000, March 10, 2004
(Delegation), March 10, 2004 (OMB
Circular A–76 Delegation), and March
31, 2010.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 12,
2011.
Marc L. Warren,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–29336 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Suspension of Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Replacement General
Aviation Airport, Mesquite, Clark
County, NV
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of suspension of
preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) as the Lead
Agency for the proposed project is
issuing this notice to advise the public
the FAA has suspended preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for a proposed Replacement
General Aviation (GA) Airport in
Mesquite, Clark County, Nevada. The
FAA received a letter dated September
27, 2011, from the City of Mesquite,
Nevada asking the FAA to suspend any
further work on the EIS. The reasons for
this action include the local economic
conditions in Mesquite and other local
fiscal and budgetary constraints.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David B. Kessler, AICP, Regional
Environmental Protection Specialist,
AWP–610.1, Airports Division, Federal
Aviation Administration, WesternPacific Region, P.O. Box 92007, Los
Angeles, California 90009–2007,
Telephone: 310/725–3615.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 8, 2004, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of
Intent in the Federal Register (69 FR
71097) to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed
construction and operation of a
proposed Replacement General Aviation
(GA) Airport, for the City of Mesquite in
eastern Clark County, Nevada. The City
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2011 / Notices
of Mesquite proposed to build the
replacement airport south of Interstate
Highway 15 between Exit 108 and 109
on the Mormon Mesa, about 15 miles
west of the existing Mesquite Municipal
Airport. The City proposed to close the
existing Mesquite Municipal Airport
and change the airport land use to
residential land use, including
construction of a new arterial roadway
through the existing airport property. To
maintain access to the National Air
Transportation System, the City also
proposed to design, fund, and build a
replacement GA airport at Mormon
Mesa that would provide GA facilities
and services to the flying public,
support regional economic development
at no cost to the FAA. The City
proposed to build the replacement GA
airport to meet FAA Airport Reference
Code (ARC) B–II standards with a new
runway 7,500 feet long by 100 feet wide.
On May 16, 2008, the Notice of
Availability of FAA’s Draft EIS was
published in the Federal Register (73
FR 28461). The FAA received 34
comment letters on the Draft EIS from
federal, state and local agencies, as well
as the general public. In March 2009, as
FAA was preparing responses to
comments received on the 2008 Draft
EIS, FAA determined there were
significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental
concerns and bearing on the Proposed
Project or its impacts. Consistent with
Title 40 CFR 1501.9, FAA decided to
prepare a Revised Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (RDEIS).
The FAA received a letter from the
City of Mesquite, dated September 27,
2011, asking the FAA to suspend any
additional work on the EIS for the
proposed Replacement GA Airport EIS.
The City of Mesquite explained the
postponement was based on local
economic conditions and other local
fiscal and budgetary constraints. The
FAA does not know how long the
suspension of the EIS will last.
Pursuant to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 77, Objects Affecting
Navigable Airspace, § 77.29 Evaluating
Aeronautical Effect, when a proponent
files a Notice of Proposed Construction
or Alteration (FAA Form 7460–1) for a
proposal in the vicinity of the proposed
Replacement General Aviation Airport
for Mesquite, the FAA will conduct an
aeronautical study to determine the
impact of a proposed structure, an
existing structure that has not yet been
studied by the FAA, or an alteration of
an existing structure on aeronautical
operations, procedures, and the safety of
flight including but not limited to the
proposal’s impact on existing and
planned public use airports.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Nov 10, 2011
Jkt 226001
Issued in Hawthorne, California, on
October 28, 2011.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, Western—Pacific
Region, AWP–600.
[FR Doc. 2011–29269 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Fifth Meeting: RTCA Special
Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium
Battery and Battery Systems—Small
and Medium Size
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special
Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium
Battery and Battery Systems—Small and
Medium Size.
AGENCY:
70531
December 1, 2011
• Review of meeting agenda, other
actions.
• Verify dates of next plenary and
upcoming meeting working group
meetings.
• Establish Agenda for 6th plenary
meeting.
• Working Group Meeting—Review
draft document.
• Working Group report, review
progress and actions.
• Review all action items.
• Adjourn.
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairman,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting. Persons
wishing to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of a meeting of
RTCA Special Committee 225,
Rechargeable Lithium Battery and
Battery Systems—Small and Medium
Size for the fifth meeting.
DATES: The meeting will be held
November 30–December 1, 2011, from
9 a.m.–5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street NW., Suite
910, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW.,
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by
telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202)
833–9434, or Web site at
https://www.rtca.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby
given for a Special Committee 225,
Rechargeable Lithium Battery and
Battery Systems—Small and Medium
Size. The agenda will include the
following:
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2,
2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
Manager, Business Operations Group, Federal
Aviation Administration.
November 30, 2011
DATES:
SUMMARY:
• Introductions and Administrative
Remarks.
• Review and approval of summary
from the 4th plenary meeting.
• Review action items.
• Review SC–225 schedule for
Plenary meetings, working group
meetings, and document preparation.
• Working Group Meeting—Review
draft document.
• Review new action items.
• Review agenda for Thursday.
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2011–29266 Filed 11–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Tenth Meeting: RTCA Special
Committee 217/EUROCAE WG–44:
Terrain and Airport Mapping
Databases
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of a meeting of
RTCA Special Committee 217/
EUROCAE WG–44: Terrain and Airport
Mapping Databases: For the tenth
meeting
SUMMARY:
The meeting will be held
December 6–9, 2011, from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
Honeywell Deer Valley Facility,
Conference Room, PRN C, 21111 N. 19th
Ave., Phoenix, AZ. 85027. If you plan
on attending please contact John Kasten
at telephone (303) 328–4535, at mobile
(303) 260–9652 or email
john.kasten@jeppesen.com.
The
RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW.,
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70530-70531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29269]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Suspension of Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Replacement General Aviation Airport, Mesquite, Clark
County, NV
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of suspension of preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as the Lead Agency
for the proposed project is issuing this notice to advise the public
the FAA has suspended preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for a proposed Replacement General Aviation (GA) Airport in
Mesquite, Clark County, Nevada. The FAA received a letter dated
September 27, 2011, from the City of Mesquite, Nevada asking the FAA to
suspend any further work on the EIS. The reasons for this action
include the local economic conditions in Mesquite and other local
fiscal and budgetary constraints.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David B. Kessler, AICP, Regional
Environmental Protection Specialist, AWP-610.1, Airports Division,
Federal Aviation Administration, Western-Pacific Region, P.O. Box
92007, Los Angeles, California 90009-2007, Telephone: 310/725-3615.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 8, 2004, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of Intent in the Federal Register
(69 FR 71097) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for
the proposed construction and operation of a proposed Replacement
General Aviation (GA) Airport, for the City of Mesquite in eastern
Clark County, Nevada. The City
[[Page 70531]]
of Mesquite proposed to build the replacement airport south of
Interstate Highway 15 between Exit 108 and 109 on the Mormon Mesa,
about 15 miles west of the existing Mesquite Municipal Airport. The
City proposed to close the existing Mesquite Municipal Airport and
change the airport land use to residential land use, including
construction of a new arterial roadway through the existing airport
property. To maintain access to the National Air Transportation System,
the City also proposed to design, fund, and build a replacement GA
airport at Mormon Mesa that would provide GA facilities and services to
the flying public, support regional economic development at no cost to
the FAA. The City proposed to build the replacement GA airport to meet
FAA Airport Reference Code (ARC) B-II standards with a new runway 7,500
feet long by 100 feet wide.
On May 16, 2008, the Notice of Availability of FAA's Draft EIS was
published in the Federal Register (73 FR 28461). The FAA received 34
comment letters on the Draft EIS from federal, state and local
agencies, as well as the general public. In March 2009, as FAA was
preparing responses to comments received on the 2008 Draft EIS, FAA
determined there were significant new circumstances or information
relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the Proposed Project
or its impacts. Consistent with Title 40 CFR 1501.9, FAA decided to
prepare a Revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement (RDEIS).
The FAA received a letter from the City of Mesquite, dated
September 27, 2011, asking the FAA to suspend any additional work on
the EIS for the proposed Replacement GA Airport EIS. The City of
Mesquite explained the postponement was based on local economic
conditions and other local fiscal and budgetary constraints. The FAA
does not know how long the suspension of the EIS will last.
Pursuant to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 77, Objects
Affecting Navigable Airspace, Sec. 77.29 Evaluating Aeronautical
Effect, when a proponent files a Notice of Proposed Construction or
Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1) for a proposal in the vicinity of the
proposed Replacement General Aviation Airport for Mesquite, the FAA
will conduct an aeronautical study to determine the impact of a
proposed structure, an existing structure that has not yet been studied
by the FAA, or an alteration of an existing structure on aeronautical
operations, procedures, and the safety of flight including but not
limited to the proposal's impact on existing and planned public use
airports.
Issued in Hawthorne, California, on October 28, 2011.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, Western--Pacific Region, AWP-600.
[FR Doc. 2011-29269 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P