Request For Information: Public Access to Digital Data Resulting from Federally Funded Scientific Research; Correction, 70176-70178 [2011-29166]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
70176
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2011 / Notices
submissions also will be posted on the
Web site, if provided in electronic
format or amenable to conversion, and
not subject to a valid protective order.
Information on how to use the
Commission’s Web site is available
online or by contacting the
Commission’s webmaster via telephone
at (202) 789–6873 or via electronic mail
at prc-webmaster@prc.gov.
The appeal and all related documents
are also available for public inspection
in the Commission’s docket section.
Docket section hours are 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except on Federal
government holidays. Docket section
personnel may be contacted via
electronic mail at prc-dockets@prc.gov
or via telephone at (202) 789–6846.
Filing of documents. All filings of
documents in this case shall be made
using the Internet (Filing Online)
pursuant to Commission rules 9(a) and
10(a) at the Commission’s Web site,
https://www.prc.gov, unless a waiver is
obtained. See 39 CFR 3001.9(a) and
3001.10(a). Instructions for obtaining an
account to file documents online may be
found on the Commission’s Web site,
https://www.prc.gov, or by contacting the
Commission’s docket section at prcdockets@prc.gov or via telephone at
(202) 789–6846.
Commission reserves the right to
redact personal information which may
infringe on an individual’s privacy
rights from documents filed in this
proceeding.
Intervention. Persons, other than the
Petitioners and respondents, wishing to
be heard in this matter are directed to
file a notice of intervention. See 39 CFR
3001.111(b). Notices of intervention in
this case are to be filed on or before
November 28, 2011. A notice of
intervention shall be filed using the
Internet (Filing Online) at the
Commission’s Web site, https://
www.prc.gov, unless a waiver is
obtained for hardcopy filing. See 39 CFR
3001.9(a) and 3001.10(a).
Further procedures. By statute, the
Commission is required to issue its
decision within 120 days from the date
it receives the appeal. See 39 U.S.C.
404(d)(5). A procedural schedule has
been developed to accommodate this
statutory deadline. In the interest of
expedition, in light of the 120-day
decision schedule, the Commission may
request the Postal Service or other
participants to submit information or
memoranda of law on any appropriate
issue. As required by Commission rules,
if any motions are filed, responses are
due 7 days after any such motion is
filed. See 39 CFR 3001.21.
It is ordered:
1. The Postal Service shall file the
applicable administrative record
regarding this appeal no later than
November 11, 2011.
2. Any responsive pleading by the
Postal Service to this notice is due no
later than November 11, 2011.
3. The procedural schedule listed
below is hereby adopted.
4. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Tracy
Ferguson is designated officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this notice and order and
Procedural Schedule in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
October 27, 2011 ................................................
November 11, 2011 ............................................
November 11, 2011 ............................................
November 28, 2011 ............................................
December 1, 2011 ..............................................
December 21, 2011 ............................................
January 5, 2011 ..................................................
January 12, 2011 ................................................
February 14, 2012 ..............................................
[FR Doc. 2011–29135 Filed 11–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request For Information: Public
Access to Digital Data Resulting from
Federally Funded Scientific Research;
Correction
Notice of Request for
Information (RFI).
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
The RFI is being corrected to
change the response date to January 2,
2012 to reflect a 60 day response time.
The RFI was published in the Federal
Register, Volume 76, Number 214, on
November 4, 2011, pages 68517–68518.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Nov 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
Filing of Appeal.
Deadline for the Postal Service to file the applicable administrative record in this appeal.
Deadline for the Postal Service to file any responsive pleading.
Deadline for notices to intervene (see 39 CFR 3001.111(b)).
Deadline for Petitioners’ Form 61 or initial brief in support of petition (see 39 CFR 3001.115(a)
and (b)).
Deadline for answering brief in support of the Postal Service (see 39 CFR 3001.115(c)).
Deadline for reply briefs in response to answering briefs (see 39 CFR 3001.115(d)).
Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral argument; the Commission will schedule
oral argument only when it is a necessary addition to the written filings (see 39 CFR
3001.116).
Expiration of the Commission’s 120-day decisional schedule (see 39 U.S.C. 404(d)(5)).
In accordance with Section 103(b)(6)
of the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010 (ACRA;
Pub. L. 111–358), this Request for
Information (RFI) offers the opportunity
for interested individuals and
organizations to provide
recommendations on approaches for
ensuring long-term stewardship and
encouraging broad public access to
unclassified digital data that result from
federally funded scientific research. The
public input provided through this
Notice will inform deliberations of the
National Science and Technology
Council’s Interagency Working Group
on Digital Data.
Release Date: November 3, 2011.
Response Date: January 2, 2012.
ADDRESSES: digitaldata@ostp.gov.
Issued By: Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP) on behalf of
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose
In accordance with Section 103(b)(6)
of the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010 (ACRA;
Pub. L. 111–358), this Request for
Information (RFI) offers the opportunity
for interested individuals and
organizations to provide
recommendations on approaches for
ensuring long-term stewardship and
encouraging broad public access to
unclassified digital data that result from
federally funded scientific research. The
public input provided through this
Notice will inform deliberations of the
National Science and Technology
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Council’s Interagency Working Group
on Digital Data.
Background
The multi-agency Interagency
Working Group on Digital Data
(Working Group), established under the
National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC) Committee on Science
(CoS), has been tasked with developing
options for implementing the digital
data policy and standards requirements
of Section 103 of ACRA. OSTP will
issue a report to Congress, in accordance
with Section 103(e) of ACRA, describing
priorities for the development of agency
policies for ensuring broad public
access to the results of federally funded
unclassified research, the status of
agency policies for public access to
digital data resulting from federally
funded research, and a summary of
public input collected from this RFI and
other mechanisms. The Working Group
is considering steps that can be taken by
Federal agencies to encourage and
coordinate the development of agency
policies and standards to promote longterm preservation of and access to
digital data resulting from federally
funded scientific research. Ideally, such
policies would harmonize, to the extent
practicable and feasible, data
management plans for digital data that
are collected or otherwise produced
either by the agency itself or
extramurally with Federal funds. The
2009 report of the Interagency Working
Group on Digital Data of the National
Science and Technology Council,
‘‘Harnessing the Power of Digital Data,’’
recommended that agencies lay the
foundations for digital scientific data
policy and make their policies publicly
available. It also recommended that
agencies consider requiring data
management plans for projects that will
generate ‘‘preservation data’’—those
data for which the benefits of
preservation exceed the costs. Federal
science agencies already have some
experience with policies to promote
long-term preservation and access to
scientific data. Indeed current Federal
policies promote and in many cases
require Federal agencies to make the
digital data generated by Federal
agencies more publically accessible.
However, such policies do not routinely
cover data generated through Federal
grants, cooperative agreements, and
some other types of funding mechanism.
Exceptions include, the National
Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Data Sharing
Policy, which requires all investigatorinitiated applications with direct costs
greater than $500,000 in any single year
provide a data management plan. In
addition, NIH has more specific data
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Nov 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
management and data sharing
requirements for specific types of
projects, such as genome-wide
association studies.
In January 2011, the National Science
Foundation (NSF) reaffirmed its data
management policy requirement,
indicating that proposals must include a
Data Management Plan that describes
how funded researchers will conform to
NSF policy on the dissemination and
sharing of research results. The NSF
policy is clear that ‘‘Investigators are
expected to share with other
researchers, at no more than
incremental cost and within a
reasonable time, the primary data,
samples, physical collections and other
supporting materials created or gathered
in the course of work under NSF
grants.’’ Such models may not
necessarily be appropriate for all types
of federally sponsored research.
As agencies consider how to further
develop digital data policies, it is
important to note that all policies for
increasing accountability and access to
digital data must follow statutory
requirements and follow best practices
for protecting confidentiality, personal
privacy, proprietary interests,
intellectual property rights, author
attribution, and for ensuring that
homeland and national security
interests are not compromised. The
Working Group is now seeking
additional insight from ‘‘non-Federal
stakeholders, including the public,
universities, nonprofit and for-profit
publishers, libraries, federally funded
and non-federally funded research
scientists, and other organizations and
institutions with an interest in longterm stewardship and improved public
access to the results of federally funded
research,’’ as described in Section
103(b)(6) of ACRA. Specifically the
Working Group seeks further public
comment on the questions listed below:
Preservation, Discoverability, and
Access
(1) What specific Federal policies
would encourage public access to and
the preservation of broadly valuable
digital data resulting from federally
funded scientific research, to grow the
U.S. economy and improve the
productivity of the American scientific
enterprise?
(2) What specific steps can be taken
to protect the intellectual property
interests of publishers, scientists,
Federal agencies, and other
stakeholders, with respect to any
existing or proposed policies for
encouraging public access to and
preservation of digital data resulting
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70177
from federally funded scientific
research?
(3) How could Federal agencies take
into account inherent differences
between scientific disciplines and
different types of digital data when
developing policies on the management
of data?
(4) How could agency policies
consider differences in the relative costs
and benefits of long-term stewardship
and dissemination of different types of
data resulting from federally funded
research?
(5) How can stakeholders (e.g.,
research communities, universities,
research institutions, libraries, scientific
publishers) best contribute to the
implementation of data management
plans?
(6) How could funding mechanisms
be improved to better address the real
costs of preserving and making digital
data accessible?
(7) What approaches could agencies
take to measure, verify, and improve
compliance with Federal data
stewardship and access policies for
scientific research? How can the burden
of compliance and verification be
minimized?
(8) What additional steps could
agencies take to stimulate innovative
use of publicly accessible research data
in new and existing markets and
industries to create jobs and grow the
economy?
(9) What mechanisms could be
developed to assure that those who
produced the data are given appropriate
attribution and credit when secondary
results are reported?
Standards for Interoperability, Reuse
and Repurposing
(10) What digital data standards
would enable interoperability, reuse,
and repurposing of digital scientific
data? For example, MIAME (minimum
information about a microarray
experiment; see Brazma et al., 2001,
Nature Genetics 29, 371) is an example
of a community-driven data standards
effort.
(11) What are other examples of
standards development processes that
were successful in producing effective
standards and what characteristics of
the process made these efforts
successful?
(12) How could Federal agencies
promote effective coordination on
digital data standards with other nations
and international communities?
(13) What policies, practices, and
standards are needed to support linking
between publications and associated
data?
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
70178
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2011 / Notices
Response to this RFI is voluntary.
Responders are free to address any or all
the above items, as well as provide
additional information that they think is
relevant to developing policies
consistent with increased preservation
and dissemination of broadly useful
digital data resulting from federally
funded research. Please note that the
Government will not pay for response
preparation or for the use of any
information contained in the response.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
[Release No. 3306; File No.: 801–35969]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
How To Submit a Response
October 24, 2011.
All comments must be submitted
electronically to: digitaldata@ostp.gov.
Responses to this RFI will be accepted
through January 2, 2012. You will
receive an electronic confirmation
acknowledging receipt of your response,
but will not receive individualized
feedback on any suggestions. No basis
for claims against the U.S. Government
shall arise as a result of a response to
this request for information or from the
Government’s use of such information.
Correction
In notice document 2011–27900,
appearing on pages 67005–67006 in the
issue of October 28, 2011, make the
following correction:
On page 67005, in the second column,
the subject heading should read as set
forth above.
Inquiries
[FR Doc. C1–2011–27900 Filed 11–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Market Data Fees
Form should include:
[Assigned ID #]
[Assigned Entry date]
Name/Email
Affiliation/Organization
City, State
Comment 1
Comment 2
Comment 3
Comment 4
Comment 5
Comment 6
Comment 7
Comment 8
Comment 9
Comment 10
Comment 11
November 3, 2011.
In addition, please identify any other
items the Working Group might
consider for Federal policies related to
public access to peer-reviewed scholarly
publications resulting from federally
supported research.
Please attach any documents that
support your comments to the
questions.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2011–29166 Filed 11–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that,
on October 24, 2011, the International
Securities Exchange, LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or the ‘‘ISE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Schedule of Fees to adopt subscription
fees for the sale of a market data offering
called the ISE Implied Volatility and
Greeks Feed. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site https://
www.ise.com, at the principal office of
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
16:38 Nov 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
ISE proposes to amend its Schedule of
Fees to adopt subscription fees for the
sale of the ISE Implied Volatility and
Greeks Feed. The Exchange previously
submitted a proposed rule change to
establish this data feed.3
ISE Implied Volatility and Greeks Feed
The ISE Implied Volatility and Greeks
Feed delivers real-time implied
volatilities and risk parameters for
equity, index and ETF options. This
information is used to track an option’s
price relative to changes in volatility
and the underlying security’s price,
which affects the theoretical price of an
option. The risk parameters are useful
for delta neutral option execution and
monitoring an option’s time premium
decay. The ISE Implied Volatility and
Greeks Feed is also useful for investing
and hedging strategies such as placing
orders based on changes in levels of
volatility. The ISE Implied Volatility
and Greeks Feed includes real-time
implied volatilities for the bid, ask and
mid-point price as well as delta, gamma,
vega, theta and rho for each option
series. The ISE Implied Volatility and
Greeks Feed is a low latency feed that
produces data for the entire universe of
U.S. options disseminated by the
Options Price Reporting Authority
(OPRA). The Exchange believes the ISE
Implied Volatility and Greeks Feed
provides valuable information that can
help users make informed investment
decisions.
3 See Exchange Act Release No. 65295 (September
8, 2011), 76 FR 56832 (September 14, 2011) (SR–
ISE–2011–55).
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–65678; File No. SR–ISE–
2011–67]
Specific questions about this RFI
should be directed to the following
email address: digitaldata@ostp.gov.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Investment Advisers Act of 1940; In the
Matter of Creative Investment
Research, Inc., 1050 17th Street NW.,
Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20036;
Notice of Intention to Cancel
Registration Pursuant to Section
203(h) of the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70176-70178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29166]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request For Information: Public Access to Digital Data Resulting
from Federally Funded Scientific Research; Correction
ACTION: Notice of Request for Information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The RFI is being corrected to change the response date to
January 2, 2012 to reflect a 60 day response time. The RFI was
published in the Federal Register, Volume 76, Number 214, on November
4, 2011, pages 68517-68518.
In accordance with Section 103(b)(6) of the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010 (ACRA; Pub. L. 111-358), this Request for
Information (RFI) offers the opportunity for interested individuals and
organizations to provide recommendations on approaches for ensuring
long-term stewardship and encouraging broad public access to
unclassified digital data that result from federally funded scientific
research. The public input provided through this Notice will inform
deliberations of the National Science and Technology Council's
Interagency Working Group on Digital Data.
Release Date: November 3, 2011.
Response Date: January 2, 2012.
ADDRESSES: digitaldata@ostp.gov.
Issued By: Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) on behalf
of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose
In accordance with Section 103(b)(6) of the America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010 (ACRA; Pub. L. 111-358), this Request for
Information (RFI) offers the opportunity for interested individuals and
organizations to provide recommendations on approaches for ensuring
long-term stewardship and encouraging broad public access to
unclassified digital data that result from federally funded scientific
research. The public input provided through this Notice will inform
deliberations of the National Science and Technology
[[Page 70177]]
Council's Interagency Working Group on Digital Data.
Background
The multi-agency Interagency Working Group on Digital Data (Working
Group), established under the National Science and Technology Council
(NSTC) Committee on Science (CoS), has been tasked with developing
options for implementing the digital data policy and standards
requirements of Section 103 of ACRA. OSTP will issue a report to
Congress, in accordance with Section 103(e) of ACRA, describing
priorities for the development of agency policies for ensuring broad
public access to the results of federally funded unclassified research,
the status of agency policies for public access to digital data
resulting from federally funded research, and a summary of public input
collected from this RFI and other mechanisms. The Working Group is
considering steps that can be taken by Federal agencies to encourage
and coordinate the development of agency policies and standards to
promote long-term preservation of and access to digital data resulting
from federally funded scientific research. Ideally, such policies would
harmonize, to the extent practicable and feasible, data management
plans for digital data that are collected or otherwise produced either
by the agency itself or extramurally with Federal funds. The 2009
report of the Interagency Working Group on Digital Data of the National
Science and Technology Council, ``Harnessing the Power of Digital
Data,'' recommended that agencies lay the foundations for digital
scientific data policy and make their policies publicly available. It
also recommended that agencies consider requiring data management plans
for projects that will generate ``preservation data''--those data for
which the benefits of preservation exceed the costs. Federal science
agencies already have some experience with policies to promote long-
term preservation and access to scientific data. Indeed current Federal
policies promote and in many cases require Federal agencies to make the
digital data generated by Federal agencies more publically accessible.
However, such policies do not routinely cover data generated through
Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and some other types of funding
mechanism. Exceptions include, the National Institutes of Health's
(NIH) Data Sharing Policy, which requires all investigator-initiated
applications with direct costs greater than $500,000 in any single year
provide a data management plan. In addition, NIH has more specific data
management and data sharing requirements for specific types of
projects, such as genome-wide association studies.
In January 2011, the National Science Foundation (NSF) reaffirmed
its data management policy requirement, indicating that proposals must
include a Data Management Plan that describes how funded researchers
will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research
results. The NSF policy is clear that ``Investigators are expected to
share with other researchers, at no more than incremental cost and
within a reasonable time, the primary data, samples, physical
collections and other supporting materials created or gathered in the
course of work under NSF grants.'' Such models may not necessarily be
appropriate for all types of federally sponsored research.
As agencies consider how to further develop digital data policies,
it is important to note that all policies for increasing accountability
and access to digital data must follow statutory requirements and
follow best practices for protecting confidentiality, personal privacy,
proprietary interests, intellectual property rights, author
attribution, and for ensuring that homeland and national security
interests are not compromised. The Working Group is now seeking
additional insight from ``non-Federal stakeholders, including the
public, universities, nonprofit and for-profit publishers, libraries,
federally funded and non-federally funded research scientists, and
other organizations and institutions with an interest in long-term
stewardship and improved public access to the results of federally
funded research,'' as described in Section 103(b)(6) of ACRA.
Specifically the Working Group seeks further public comment on the
questions listed below:
Preservation, Discoverability, and Access
(1) What specific Federal policies would encourage public access to
and the preservation of broadly valuable digital data resulting from
federally funded scientific research, to grow the U.S. economy and
improve the productivity of the American scientific enterprise?
(2) What specific steps can be taken to protect the intellectual
property interests of publishers, scientists, Federal agencies, and
other stakeholders, with respect to any existing or proposed policies
for encouraging public access to and preservation of digital data
resulting from federally funded scientific research?
(3) How could Federal agencies take into account inherent
differences between scientific disciplines and different types of
digital data when developing policies on the management of data?
(4) How could agency policies consider differences in the relative
costs and benefits of long-term stewardship and dissemination of
different types of data resulting from federally funded research?
(5) How can stakeholders (e.g., research communities, universities,
research institutions, libraries, scientific publishers) best
contribute to the implementation of data management plans?
(6) How could funding mechanisms be improved to better address the
real costs of preserving and making digital data accessible?
(7) What approaches could agencies take to measure, verify, and
improve compliance with Federal data stewardship and access policies
for scientific research? How can the burden of compliance and
verification be minimized?
(8) What additional steps could agencies take to stimulate
innovative use of publicly accessible research data in new and existing
markets and industries to create jobs and grow the economy?
(9) What mechanisms could be developed to assure that those who
produced the data are given appropriate attribution and credit when
secondary results are reported?
Standards for Interoperability, Reuse and Repurposing
(10) What digital data standards would enable interoperability,
reuse, and repurposing of digital scientific data? For example, MIAME
(minimum information about a microarray experiment; see Brazma et al.,
2001, Nature Genetics 29, 371) is an example of a community-driven data
standards effort.
(11) What are other examples of standards development processes
that were successful in producing effective standards and what
characteristics of the process made these efforts successful?
(12) How could Federal agencies promote effective coordination on
digital data standards with other nations and international
communities?
(13) What policies, practices, and standards are needed to support
linking between publications and associated data?
[[Page 70178]]
Response to this RFI is voluntary. Responders are free to address
any or all the above items, as well as provide additional information
that they think is relevant to developing policies consistent with
increased preservation and dissemination of broadly useful digital data
resulting from federally funded research. Please note that the
Government will not pay for response preparation or for the use of any
information contained in the response.
How To Submit a Response
All comments must be submitted electronically to:
digitaldata@ostp.gov.
Responses to this RFI will be accepted through January 2, 2012. You
will receive an electronic confirmation acknowledging receipt of your
response, but will not receive individualized feedback on any
suggestions. No basis for claims against the U.S. Government shall
arise as a result of a response to this request for information or from
the Government's use of such information.
Inquiries
Specific questions about this RFI should be directed to the
following email address: digitaldata@ostp.gov.
Form should include:
[Assigned ID ]
[Assigned Entry date]
Name/Email
Affiliation/Organization
City, State
Comment 1
Comment 2
Comment 3
Comment 4
Comment 5
Comment 6
Comment 7
Comment 8
Comment 9
Comment 10
Comment 11
In addition, please identify any other items the Working Group
might consider for Federal policies related to public access to peer-
reviewed scholarly publications resulting from federally supported
research.
Please attach any documents that support your comments to the
questions.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2011-29166 Filed 11-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
