Technical Revisions To Update Reference to the Required Assessment Tool for State Nursing Homes Receiving Per Diem Payments From VA, 70076-70078 [2011-29157]
Download as PDF
70076
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules
MSHA is providing additional time for
interested parties to comment on the
proposed rule. MSHA is extending the
comment period from November 14,
2011 to November 28, 2011. All
comments and supporting
documentation must be received or
postmarked by November 28, 2011.
Dated: November 7, 2011.
Joseph A. Main,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2011–29128 Filed 11–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 51
RIN 2900–AO02
Technical Revisions To Update
Reference to the Required Assessment
Tool for State Nursing Homes
Receiving Per Diem Payments From
VA
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations to update the reference to
the required resident assessment tool for
State homes that receive per diem from
VA for providing nursing home care to
veterans. The proposed rule would
require State nursing homes receiving
per diem from VA to use the most recent
version of the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident
Assessment Instrument/Minimum Data
Set (MDS), which is version 3.0. This
will ensure that the standard used to
assess veterans is the same as the
standard applicable to Medicare and
Medicaid beneficiaries.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov; by mail or hand
delivery to the Director, Office of
Regulation Policy and Management
(02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or
by fax to (202) 273–9026. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AO02,
Technical Revisions to Update
Reference to the Required Assessment
Tool for State Nursing Homes Receiving
Per Diem Payments From VA.’’ Copies
of comments received will be available
for public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management,
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Nov 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
Room 1063B, between the hours of
8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 461–4902 (this is not a toll-free
number) for an appointment. In
addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
System at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Quest, Chief, State Veterans
Home Clinical & Survey Oversight,
Geriatrics and Extended Care Services
(114), Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–6064. (This is not a
toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April,
2009, VA published in the Federal
Register a rule amending part 51 of title
38, Code of Federal Regulations, which
set forth a mechanism for paying per
diem to State homes providing nursing
home care to eligible veterans. 74 FR
19426–01 (Apr. 29, 2009). This
regulation went into effect on May 29,
2009. 38 CFR 51.110. This proposed
rule would amend 38 CFR part 51 to
update reference to the required
resident assessment tool for State homes
providing nursing home care, The
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) Resident Assessment
Instrument/Minimum Data Set (MDS).
The MDS is a core set of screening,
clinical, and functional status elements
that form the foundation of the
comprehensive assessment for all
residents of long term care facilities
certified to participate in Medicare and
Medicaid. While these certified facilities
complete the MDS as a condition of
receiving CMS payments for the
provision of long term care to Medicare
and Medicaid beneficiaries, the MDS is
the standardized assessment instrument
in long term care generally, and is
designed to identify the health care
needs of residents and generate a plan
of care regardless of source of payment
for the individual resident. VA therefore
requires State homes receiving per diem
for the provision of long term care to
veterans to use the MDS, and to transmit
data from the MDS electronically to the
VA Austin Information Technology
Center (AITC), for the purpose of
monitoring certain care indicators for
the benefit of veterans. The MDS
version currently required by the
regulation is MDS 2.0. 38 CFR
51.110(b)(1)(i).
On October 1, 2010, all CMS certified
long term care facilities were required to
update their assessment from MDS 2.0
to MDS 3.0. It is critical that VA
mandate by regulation that State homes
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
receiving per diem to provide long term
care to veterans use the most up to date
version of MDS as well. This will ensure
that the most comprehensive assessment
is performed for all veterans in State
homes receiving per diem, and thereby
that the highest standard of care is
provided for those veterans. Indeed, if
veterans are assessed under the former
2.0 standard, VA would essentially
permit State homes to care for veterans
using a lower assessment standard than
that afforded other Federally funded
patients.
The most significant change in the
MDS 3.0 update requires that a direct
interview be conducted with all
residents who are able to be understood
at least some of the time, such that staff
must directly communicate with the
resident to complete certain sections of
the MDS. This is in contrast to staff
relying on the medical record to
complete certain MDS sections, as was
permitted under MDS 2.0. The sections
in MDS 3.0 which now require a direct
interview to complete relate to the
topics of cognition, mood, daily
activities and preferences, and pain. For
instance, a staff member providing
rehabilitation services to a resident can
no longer rely on a previous entry of a
Registered Nurse in the medical record
regarding a resident’s level of pain to
complete that staff member’s section of
the MDS. Direct interviewing ensures
firsthand, real time monitoring in the
MDS, improving accuracy of the entered
information. We agree with CMS’s
changes because we believe that MDS
3.0 provides a more accurate assessment
and will help ensure that the most
comprehensive care plan is developed,
and will help ensure that the highest
standard of care is provided.
The MDS assessment process itself
generates Quality Indicators, Quality
Measures, and Resource Utilization
Groups (RUGs). The RUGs are used in
nurse staffing methodology to determine
resident case mix, or how residents may
be categorized so that resources are
maximized to provide the highest
standard of care. The MDS 3.0 update
has increased the number of RUGs from
53 to 66. This increase reflects
technological advances in healthcare
and changes in resident and staff mix,
as well as changes in healthcare
practice. For example, conditions and
services such as mood assessment and
the pain interview have been added,
and the behavior section has been
modified, which now ensures these
issues are considered in care planning.
Because this change should lead to
improved long term care, we believe
that it is appropriate to require the
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules
increased RUGS under our per diem
regulations.
Other important changes in the MDS
3.0 update, which also ensure the most
comprehensive assessment and that the
highest standard of care is provided to
veterans, include the following
requirements: documentation of a
significant change for any resident who
enrolls in a hospice program;
documentation of pressure ulcers
present on admission; documentation of
the type of injury sustained in a fall; and
a resident assessment at discharge. The
following have been eliminated: the
reverse staging of pressure ulcers to
document healing and documentation of
the use of a catheter to show a patient
is continent. Additionally, a section has
been included concerning the return of
the resident to the community.
We note that the vast majority of State
homes receiving per diem from VA are
CMS certified and receiving payments
from CMS for the provision of long term
care to Medicare and Medicaid
beneficiaries, and, therefore, are already
using MDS 3.0. These State homes do
not use the former MDS 2.0 to
separately assess veterans whose long
term care is covered instead by per diem
payments from VA. This rulemaking
will affect only those State homes that
are not CMS certified, do not receive
CMS payments for the provision of long
term care, and have not updated to MDS
3.0. We estimate that this will affect
only 56 out of the 140 State homes who
receive per diem payments from VA.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as
revised by this proposed rulemaking,
would represent the exclusive legal
authority on this subject. No contrary
rules or procedures would be
authorized. All VA guidance would be
read to conform with this proposed
rulemaking if possible, or, if not
possible, such guidance would be
superseded by this rulemaking.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed regulatory amendment
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612. The reason for this certification is
that these amendments would not
directly affect any small entities, as the
State homes that are subject to this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Nov 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
rulemaking are State government
entities under the control of State
governments. All State homes are
owned, operated, and managed by State
governments except for a small number
that are operated by entities under
contract with State governments. These
contractors are not small entities.
Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
proposed amendment is exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule that may result in expenditure by
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70077
State, local, or Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more (adjusted annually
for inflation) in any given year. This
rule would have no such effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments, or on the
private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.005, Grants to States for Construction
of State Home Facilities; 64.009,
Veterans Medical Care Benefits; 64.010,
Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.015,
Veterans State Nursing Home Care;
64.018, Sharing Specialized Medical
Resources; 64.019, Veterans
Rehabilitation, Alcohol and Drug
Dependence.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. John
R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department
of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on November 4, 2011, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Government
contracts, Grant programs—health,
Grant programs—veterans, Health care,
Health facilities, Health professions,
Health records, Mental health programs,
Nursing homes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Travel and
transportation expenses, Veterans.
Dated: November 7, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and
Management, Office of the General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part
51 as follows:
PART 51—PER DIEM FOR NURSING
HOME CARE OF VETERANS IN STATE
HOMES
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1720,
1741–1743; and as stated in specific sections.
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
70078
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 218 / Thursday, November 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules
2. Amend § 51.110(b)(1)(i) by
removing the phrase ‘‘Version 2.0’’ and
adding, in its place, ‘‘Version 3.0’’.
[FR Doc. 2011–29157 Filed 11–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0316–201156; FRL–
9489–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Designation
of Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; Alabama; Redesignation of
the Birmingham 1997 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area
to Attainment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On May 2, 2011, the State of
Alabama, through the Alabama
Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM), Air Division,
submitted a request for EPA to
redesignate the Birmingham fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment
area (hereafter referred to as the
‘‘Birmingham Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’) to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS); and to approve a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
containing a maintenance plan for the
Area. The Birmingham 1997 Annual
PM2.5 nonattainment area is comprised
of Jefferson and Shelby Counties in their
entireties and a portion of Walker
County. EPA is proposing to approve
the redesignation request for the
Birmingham Area, along with the
related SIP revision, including
Alabama’s 2009 emissions inventory for
the Area and Alabama’s plan for
maintaining attainment of the PM2.5
standard in the Area. EPA is also
proposing to approve the motor vehicle
emission budgets (MVEBs) for nitrogen
oxides (NOX) and PM2.5 for the year
2024 for the Birmingham Area. These
actions are being proposed pursuant to
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and its
implementing regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2011–0316, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Nov 09, 2011
Jkt 226001
2. Email: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0316,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms.
Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2011–
0316. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
Huey of the Regulatory Development
Section, in the Air Planning Branch,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Joel
Huey may be reached by phone at (404)
562–9104, or via electronic mail at
huey.joel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Content
I. What are the actions EPA is proposing to
take?
II. What is the background for EPA’s
proposed actions?
III. What are the criteria for redesignation?
IV. Why is EPA proposing these actions?
V. What is EPA’s analysis of the request?
VI. What is EPA’s analysis of Alabama’s
proposed NOX and PM2.5 MVEBs for the
Birmingham area?
VII. What is the status of EPA’s adequacy
determination for the proposed NOX and
PM2.5 MVEBs for 2024 for the
Birmingham area?
VIII. What is EPA’s analysis of the proposed
2009 base year emissions inventory for
the Birmingham area?
IX. Proposed Action on the Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan SIP
Revision Including Proposed Approval
of the 2024 NOX and PM2.5 MVEBs for
the Birmingham Area
X. What is the effect of EPA’s proposed
actions?
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What are the actions EPA is
proposing to take?
EPA is proposing to take the following
three separate but related actions, some
of which involve multiple elements: (1)
To redesignate the Birmingham Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
E:\FR\FM\10NOP1.SGM
10NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 218 (Thursday, November 10, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70076-70078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29157]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 51
RIN 2900-AO02
Technical Revisions To Update Reference to the Required
Assessment Tool for State Nursing Homes Receiving Per Diem Payments
From VA
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations to update the reference to the required resident assessment
tool for State homes that receive per diem from VA for providing
nursing home care to veterans. The proposed rule would require State
nursing homes receiving per diem from VA to use the most recent version
of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident
Assessment Instrument/Minimum Data Set (MDS), which is version 3.0.
This will ensure that the standard used to assess veterans is the same
as the standard applicable to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries.
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before January 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.regulations.gov; by mail or hand delivery to the Director, Office
of Regulation Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by
fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ``RIN 2900-AO02, Technical Revisions to Update Reference
to the Required Assessment Tool for State Nursing Homes Receiving Per
Diem Payments From VA.'' Copies of comments received will be available
for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902
(this is not a toll-free number) for an appointment. In addition,
during the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the
Federal Docket Management System at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Quest, Chief, State Veterans
Home Clinical & Survey Oversight, Geriatrics and Extended Care Services
(114), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs,
810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-6064. (This is
not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April, 2009, VA published in the Federal
Register a rule amending part 51 of title 38, Code of Federal
Regulations, which set forth a mechanism for paying per diem to State
homes providing nursing home care to eligible veterans. 74 FR 19426-01
(Apr. 29, 2009). This regulation went into effect on May 29, 2009. 38
CFR 51.110. This proposed rule would amend 38 CFR part 51 to update
reference to the required resident assessment tool for State homes
providing nursing home care, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument/Minimum Data Set (MDS).
The MDS is a core set of screening, clinical, and functional status
elements that form the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for
all residents of long term care facilities certified to participate in
Medicare and Medicaid. While these certified facilities complete the
MDS as a condition of receiving CMS payments for the provision of long
term care to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, the MDS is the
standardized assessment instrument in long term care generally, and is
designed to identify the health care needs of residents and generate a
plan of care regardless of source of payment for the individual
resident. VA therefore requires State homes receiving per diem for the
provision of long term care to veterans to use the MDS, and to transmit
data from the MDS electronically to the VA Austin Information
Technology Center (AITC), for the purpose of monitoring certain care
indicators for the benefit of veterans. The MDS version currently
required by the regulation is MDS 2.0. 38 CFR 51.110(b)(1)(i).
On October 1, 2010, all CMS certified long term care facilities
were required to update their assessment from MDS 2.0 to MDS 3.0. It is
critical that VA mandate by regulation that State homes receiving per
diem to provide long term care to veterans use the most up to date
version of MDS as well. This will ensure that the most comprehensive
assessment is performed for all veterans in State homes receiving per
diem, and thereby that the highest standard of care is provided for
those veterans. Indeed, if veterans are assessed under the former 2.0
standard, VA would essentially permit State homes to care for veterans
using a lower assessment standard than that afforded other Federally
funded patients.
The most significant change in the MDS 3.0 update requires that a
direct interview be conducted with all residents who are able to be
understood at least some of the time, such that staff must directly
communicate with the resident to complete certain sections of the MDS.
This is in contrast to staff relying on the medical record to complete
certain MDS sections, as was permitted under MDS 2.0. The sections in
MDS 3.0 which now require a direct interview to complete relate to the
topics of cognition, mood, daily activities and preferences, and pain.
For instance, a staff member providing rehabilitation services to a
resident can no longer rely on a previous entry of a Registered Nurse
in the medical record regarding a resident's level of pain to complete
that staff member's section of the MDS. Direct interviewing ensures
firsthand, real time monitoring in the MDS, improving accuracy of the
entered information. We agree with CMS's changes because we believe
that MDS 3.0 provides a more accurate assessment and will help ensure
that the most comprehensive care plan is developed, and will help
ensure that the highest standard of care is provided.
The MDS assessment process itself generates Quality Indicators,
Quality Measures, and Resource Utilization Groups (RUGs). The RUGs are
used in nurse staffing methodology to determine resident case mix, or
how residents may be categorized so that resources are maximized to
provide the highest standard of care. The MDS 3.0 update has increased
the number of RUGs from 53 to 66. This increase reflects technological
advances in healthcare and changes in resident and staff mix, as well
as changes in healthcare practice. For example, conditions and services
such as mood assessment and the pain interview have been added, and the
behavior section has been modified, which now ensures these issues are
considered in care planning. Because this change should lead to
improved long term care, we believe that it is appropriate to require
the
[[Page 70077]]
increased RUGS under our per diem regulations.
Other important changes in the MDS 3.0 update, which also ensure
the most comprehensive assessment and that the highest standard of care
is provided to veterans, include the following requirements:
documentation of a significant change for any resident who enrolls in a
hospice program; documentation of pressure ulcers present on admission;
documentation of the type of injury sustained in a fall; and a resident
assessment at discharge. The following have been eliminated: the
reverse staging of pressure ulcers to document healing and
documentation of the use of a catheter to show a patient is continent.
Additionally, a section has been included concerning the return of the
resident to the community.
We note that the vast majority of State homes receiving per diem
from VA are CMS certified and receiving payments from CMS for the
provision of long term care to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries,
and, therefore, are already using MDS 3.0. These State homes do not use
the former MDS 2.0 to separately assess veterans whose long term care
is covered instead by per diem payments from VA. This rulemaking will
affect only those State homes that are not CMS certified, do not
receive CMS payments for the provision of long term care, and have not
updated to MDS 3.0. We estimate that this will affect only 56 out of
the 140 State homes who receive per diem payments from VA.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by this proposed
rulemaking, would represent the exclusive legal authority on this
subject. No contrary rules or procedures would be authorized. All VA
guidance would be read to conform with this proposed rulemaking if
possible, or, if not possible, such guidance would be superseded by
this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed regulatory
amendment would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612. The reason for this certification is
that these amendments would not directly affect any small entities, as
the State homes that are subject to this rulemaking are State
government entities under the control of State governments. All State
homes are owned, operated, and managed by State governments except for
a small number that are operated by entities under contract with State
governments. These contractors are not small entities. Therefore, under
5 U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed amendment is exempt from the initial and
final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and
604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), as ``any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in expenditure by State, local, or
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any given year.
This rule would have no such effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.005, Grants to States for
Construction of State Home Facilities; 64.009, Veterans Medical Care
Benefits; 64.010, Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.015, Veterans State
Nursing Home Care; 64.018, Sharing Specialized Medical Resources;
64.019, Veterans Rehabilitation, Alcohol and Drug Dependence.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R.
Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on November 4, 2011, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Government
contracts, Grant programs--health, Grant programs--veterans, Health
care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records, Mental
health programs, Nursing homes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Travel and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Dated: November 7, 2011.
Robert C. McFetridge,
Director of Regulation Policy and Management, Office of the General
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 51 as follows:
PART 51--PER DIEM FOR NURSING HOME CARE OF VETERANS IN STATE HOMES
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1720, 1741-1743; and as
stated in specific sections.
[[Page 70078]]
2. Amend Sec. 51.110(b)(1)(i) by removing the phrase ``Version
2.0'' and adding, in its place, ``Version 3.0''.
[FR Doc. 2011-29157 Filed 11-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P