U.S. Army Installation Management Command; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision, 69293-69294 [2011-28889]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2011 / Notices
ensure consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2011–0256 in the subject line of
your comments. For additional
instructions on submitting comments
and instructions on accessing
documents related to this action, see
‘‘Submitting Comments and Accessing
Information’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
You may submit comments by one of
the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2011–0256. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: (301) 492–3668; email:
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
• Fax comments to: RADB at (301)
492–3446.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
John Wise, Division of License Renewal,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
(301) 415–8489; email:
John.Wise@nrc.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments and Accessing
Information
Comments submitted in writing or in
electronic form will be posted on the
NRC Web site and on the Federal
rulemaking Web site, https://
www.regulations.gov. Because your
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
the NRC cautions you against including
any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party
soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for
submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their
comments to remove any identifying or
contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in
their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed.
You can access publicly available
documents related to this document
using the following methods:
• NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR): The public may examine and
have copied, for a fee, publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Nov 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
created or received at the NRC are
available online in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this page, the public
can gain entry into ADAMS, which
provides text and image files of the
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s
PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
301–415–4737, or by email to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft LR–
ISG–2011–01 is available electronically
under ADAMS Accession Number
ML112360626. The GALL Report and
SRP–LR are available under ADAMS
Accession Nos. ML103490041 and
ML103490036, respectively.
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site:
Public comments and supporting
materials related to this notice can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching on Docket ID NRC–2011–
0256.
• NRC’s Interim Staff Guidance Web
Site: The LR–ISG documents are also
available online under the ‘‘License
Renewal’’ heading at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/#int.
Background
The NRC issues LR–ISGs to
communicate insights and lessons
learned and to address emergent issues
not covered in license renewal guidance
documents, such as the GALL Report
and SRP–LR. In this way, the NRC staff
and stakeholders may use the guidance
in an LR–ISG document before it is
incorporated into a formal license
renewal guidance document revision.
The NRC staff issues LR–ISG in
accordance with the LR–ISG Process,
Revision 2 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML100920158), for which a notice of
availability was published in the
Federal Register on June 22, 2010 (75
FR 35510).
The NRC staff has determined that
existing guidance in the SRP–LR and
GALL Report may not adequately
address aging management of stainless
steel structures and components
exposed to treated borated water.
Specifically, for pressurized water
reactors, the guidance inappropriately
credits boron as a corrosion inhibitor in
place of other aging management
activities. As a result, aging effects such
as loss of material, cracking, and
reduction of heat transfer may not be
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69293
adequately managed. The staff has
proposed to revise the SRP–LR and
GALL Report to align the guidance for
treated borated water with that for
treated (non-borated) water. The
revisions include adding the One-Time
Inspection Program to verify the
effectiveness of the Water Chemistry
Program to manage loss of material and
cracking of stainless steel structures and
components exposed to treated borated
water and adding reduction of heat
transfer due to fouling as an aging effect
requiring management for stainless steel
heat exchanger tubes exposed to treated
borated water.
Proposed Action
By this action, the NRC is requesting
public comments on draft LR–ISG–
2011–01. This LR–ISG proposes certain
revisions to NRC guidance in the SRP–
LR and GALL Report. The NRC staff will
make a final determination regarding
issuance of the LR–ISG after it considers
any public comments received in
response to this request.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day
of November, 2011. For the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
Melanie A. Galloway,
Acting Director, Division of License Renewal,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–28891 Filed 11–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0352; Docket No. 40–09083]
U.S. Army Installation Management
Command; Notice of Issuance of
Director’s Decision
Notice is hereby given that the
Director, Office of Federal and State
Materials and Environmental
Management Programs (FSME) has
issued a Director’s Decision with regard
to a Petition, dated March 4, 2010, filed
by Mr. Issac Harp, herein after referred
to as the ‘‘Petitioner,’’ pursuant to Title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) 2.206. The Petition was
supplemented on April 14, 2010. The
Petition concerns the possession, by the
U.S. Army, of depleted uranium (DU), a
source material, in spent spotting
rounds from the Davy Crockett Weapon
System without a valid U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) license.
The Petition requested that the NRC
take enforcement action against the U.S.
Army by initiating an investigation into
the potential violation of NRC License
SUB–459, and if it was determined that
a violation occurred, to apply the full
penalty permissible by law. The Petition
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
69294
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2011 / Notices
also requested that any monetary fines
be used for remediation of the Schofield
Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Areas
in Hawaii. The basis for the request was
that the U.S. Army’s license, SUB–459,
expired on October 31, 1964, and that
any DU possessed by the U.S. Army or
released into the environment after the
expiration date was an unlawful act,
subject to NRC enforcement policies.
The Petition raised a concern about
the possession of licensable quantities
of DU by the U.S. Army without an NRC
license to do so. Section 40.3 states, in
part, that persons may not receive title
to, own, receive, possess, use, transfer,
or dispose of source material unless
authorized in a specific or general
license issued by the Commission.
Contrary to 10 CFR 40.3, the U.S. Army
is in possession of DU, a source
material, in the form of spent spotting
rounds (expended prior to 1968) at
firing ranges located at Schofield
Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Area,
in Hawaii and on other U.S. Army
installations, in excess of the exempt
and general use limits, without
authorization in a specific or general
license issued by the NRC.
The Petitioner met with the FSME
Petition Review Board by teleconference
on April 14, 2010, to discuss the
Petition. The meeting gave the
Petitioner an opportunity to provide
additional information and to clarify
issues raised in the Petition. The
transcript of this meeting was treated as
a supplement to the Petition and is
available in the Agencywide Document
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) for inspection at the NRC’s
Public Document Room, O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Publicly available documents created or
receive at the NRC are available online
in the NRC Library at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
The NRC issued a proposed Director’s
Decision (DD–11–05) dated August 8,
2011, which granted the Petition, in
part, and denied the Petition, in part.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed
Director’s Decision to the Petitioner and
to the U.S. Army for comment on
August 8, 2011. The Petitioner
responded on August 21, 2011. The U.S.
Army did not provide comments on the
proposed Director’s Decision. The
Petitioner’s comments and the NRC
staff’s responses are included in the
Director’s Decision.
The Director of the Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs has determined
that the activities requested by the
Petitioner have been granted in part and
denied in part. The reasons for this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Nov 07, 2011
Jkt 226001
decision are explained in the Director’s
Decision pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 [DD–
11–05], the complete text of which is
available in ADAMS for inspection at
the NRC’s Public Document Room, O1–
F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland 20852. Publicly available
documents created or receive at the NRC
are available online in the NRC Library
at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html.
The Petition requested that the NRC
investigate whether, contrary to
applicable law and regulations, the U.S.
Army possessed or released into the
environment DU from spent spotting
rounds after the expiration of NRC
License SUB–459. NRC conducted an
investigation of the U.S. Army’s
possession of licensable quantities of
DU and issued a Severity Level III
Notice of Violation to the U.S. Army
(ML111680087). Consistent with NRC
Enforcement Policy (www.nrc.gov/
about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/
enfore-pol.html) the NRC chose not to
impose any civil penalty because: (1)
The U.S. Army installations in Hawaii
have not been previously the subject of
escalated enforcement action; (2) the
U.S. Army identified and notified the
NRC of the presence of radioactive
material; and (3) the U.S. Army
implemented corrective actions in
response to the discovery of the
presence of the depleted uranium.
Therefore, insofar as the NRC has
undertaken certain activities requested
by the Petitioner, that being the
initiation of an investigation to
determine whether the U.S. Army
possesses DU in licensable quantities
without authorization from the NRC to
do so and the issuance of an
enforcement action based on that
investigation, the NRC granted that
portion of the Petition concerned with
such activities.
In addition, the Petition requested
that, if the NRC determined that a
violation occurred, to assess against the
U.S. Army the maximum penalty
permitted by law, and asked that any
assessed monetary fines be applied to
the environmental remediation of DU
contamination at the Schofield Barracks
and Pohakuloa Training Area
installations in Hawaii, if the law
provides for such action. Were the NRC
to have chosen to impose a civil
penalty, the law does not provide for the
application of that assessed civil penalty
to the environmental remediation of DU
contamination as requested by the
Petitioner. Fines assessed for violations
of NRC requirements are sent to the U.S.
Treasury. Therefore, this portion of the
Petition was denied.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
As provided in 10 CFR 2.206(c), a
copy of this Director’s Decision will be
filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for the Commission to
review. As provided for by this
regulation, the Decision will constitute
the final action of the Commission 25
days after the date of the Decision,
unless the Commission, on its own
motion, institutes a review of the
Decision within that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day
of October 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cynthia A. Carpenter,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal and State
Materialsand Environmental Management
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–28889 Filed 11–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2011–0204]
Proposed Generic Communication
Draft Generic Letter on Seismic Risk
Evaluations for Operating Reactors
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft generic letter; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
On September 1, 2011 (76 FR
54507), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) published for public
comment Draft Generic Letter 2011–XX:
Seismic Risk Evaluations for Operating
Reactors. The public comment period
was scheduled to expire on October, 31,
2011; however, on September 16, 2011
(76 FR 57767), the NRC issued a
correction and extended the public
comment period to November 15, 2011.
In order to allow the public sufficient
time to review and comment on the
Draft Generic Letter, the NRC has
decided to extend the comment period
for the Draft Generic Letter until
December 15, 2011.
DATES: The comment period has been
extended and expires on December 15,
2011. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so. The NRC is only able to assure
consideration of comments received on
or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2011–0204 in the subject line of
your comments. For instructions on
submitting comments and accessing
documents related to this action, see
Section I, ‘‘Submitting Comments and
Accessing Information’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. You may submit
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69293-69294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28889]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2009-0352; Docket No. 40-09083]
U.S. Army Installation Management Command; Notice of Issuance of
Director's Decision
Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Federal and
State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME) has issued
a Director's Decision with regard to a Petition, dated March 4, 2010,
filed by Mr. Issac Harp, herein after referred to as the
``Petitioner,'' pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) 2.206. The Petition was supplemented on April 14, 2010. The
Petition concerns the possession, by the U.S. Army, of depleted uranium
(DU), a source material, in spent spotting rounds from the Davy
Crockett Weapon System without a valid U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) license.
The Petition requested that the NRC take enforcement action against
the U.S. Army by initiating an investigation into the potential
violation of NRC License SUB-459, and if it was determined that a
violation occurred, to apply the full penalty permissible by law. The
Petition
[[Page 69294]]
also requested that any monetary fines be used for remediation of the
Schofield Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Areas in Hawaii. The basis
for the request was that the U.S. Army's license, SUB-459, expired on
October 31, 1964, and that any DU possessed by the U.S. Army or
released into the environment after the expiration date was an unlawful
act, subject to NRC enforcement policies.
The Petition raised a concern about the possession of licensable
quantities of DU by the U.S. Army without an NRC license to do so.
Section 40.3 states, in part, that persons may not receive title to,
own, receive, possess, use, transfer, or dispose of source material
unless authorized in a specific or general license issued by the
Commission. Contrary to 10 CFR 40.3, the U.S. Army is in possession of
DU, a source material, in the form of spent spotting rounds (expended
prior to 1968) at firing ranges located at Schofield Barracks and
Pohakuloa Training Area, in Hawaii and on other U.S. Army
installations, in excess of the exempt and general use limits, without
authorization in a specific or general license issued by the NRC.
The Petitioner met with the FSME Petition Review Board by
teleconference on April 14, 2010, to discuss the Petition. The meeting
gave the Petitioner an opportunity to provide additional information
and to clarify issues raised in the Petition. The transcript of this
meeting was treated as a supplement to the Petition and is available in
the Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) for
inspection at the NRC's Public Document Room, O1-F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Publicly available documents created or receive at the NRC are
available online in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
The NRC issued a proposed Director's Decision (DD-11-05) dated
August 8, 2011, which granted the Petition, in part, and denied the
Petition, in part. The NRC sent a copy of the proposed Director's
Decision to the Petitioner and to the U.S. Army for comment on August
8, 2011. The Petitioner responded on August 21, 2011. The U.S. Army did
not provide comments on the proposed Director's Decision. The
Petitioner's comments and the NRC staff's responses are included in the
Director's Decision.
The Director of the Office of Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs has determined that the activities
requested by the Petitioner have been granted in part and denied in
part. The reasons for this decision are explained in the Director's
Decision pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 [DD-11-05], the complete text of
which is available in ADAMS for inspection at the NRC's Public Document
Room, O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first
floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly available documents created
or receive at the NRC are available online in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
The Petition requested that the NRC investigate whether, contrary
to applicable law and regulations, the U.S. Army possessed or released
into the environment DU from spent spotting rounds after the expiration
of NRC License SUB-459. NRC conducted an investigation of the U.S.
Army's possession of licensable quantities of DU and issued a Severity
Level III Notice of Violation to the U.S. Army (ML111680087).
Consistent with NRC Enforcement Policy (www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/enfore-pol.html) the NRC chose not to impose any
civil penalty because: (1) The U.S. Army installations in Hawaii have
not been previously the subject of escalated enforcement action; (2)
the U.S. Army identified and notified the NRC of the presence of
radioactive material; and (3) the U.S. Army implemented corrective
actions in response to the discovery of the presence of the depleted
uranium. Therefore, insofar as the NRC has undertaken certain
activities requested by the Petitioner, that being the initiation of an
investigation to determine whether the U.S. Army possesses DU in
licensable quantities without authorization from the NRC to do so and
the issuance of an enforcement action based on that investigation, the
NRC granted that portion of the Petition concerned with such
activities.
In addition, the Petition requested that, if the NRC determined
that a violation occurred, to assess against the U.S. Army the maximum
penalty permitted by law, and asked that any assessed monetary fines be
applied to the environmental remediation of DU contamination at the
Schofield Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Area installations in Hawaii,
if the law provides for such action. Were the NRC to have chosen to
impose a civil penalty, the law does not provide for the application of
that assessed civil penalty to the environmental remediation of DU
contamination as requested by the Petitioner. Fines assessed for
violations of NRC requirements are sent to the U.S. Treasury.
Therefore, this portion of the Petition was denied.
As provided in 10 CFR 2.206(c), a copy of this Director's Decision
will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for the Commission
to review. As provided for by this regulation, the Decision will
constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of
the Decision, unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a
review of the Decision within that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of October 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cynthia A. Carpenter,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal and State Materialsand Environmental
Management Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-28889 Filed 11-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P