Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes, 69163-69166 [2011-28836]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2011– 1227; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM– 100–AD. Comments Due Date (a) We must receive comments by December 23, 2011. Affected ADs (b) None. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Applicability (c) This AD applies to all Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes; Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes; and Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes; certificated in any category. Subject (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight controls. Reason (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states: A number of reports of aileron control stiffness have been received on Bombardier Regional Jet aeroplanes. Bombardier has reviewed the current maintenance tasks for the aileron control system and determined VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:17 Nov 07, 2011 Jkt 226001 69163 that an additional maintenance task is required. * * * [A]ileron control stiffness during flight * * * could result in reduced controllability of the aeroplane. FAA AD Differences Compliance (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Other FAA AD Provisions (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7300; fax (516) 794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. Actions (g) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the maintenance program to incorporate Task 271000–218, discard of the outboard wing aileron pulleys, as specified in Bombardier Temporary Revision (TR) 1–41, dated October 22, 2010, to Section 2—Systems/Powerplant Program of Part 1 of the Bombardier CL–600–2C10, CL–600– 2D15, CL–600–2D24, CL–600–2E25 Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM). For this task, the initial compliance time starts at the applicable time specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), or (g)(4) of this AD. Thereafter, operate the airplane according to the procedures and compliance times in Bombardier TR 1–41, dated October 22, 2010. (1) For airplanes with 10,000 or less total flight hours as of the effective date of this AD: Prior to the outboard wing aileron pulley accumulating 12,000 total flight hours. (2) For airplanes with more than 10,000 total flight hours but with 16,000 total flight hours or less as of the effective date of this AD: Prior to the outboard wing aileron pulley accumulating 17,300 total flight hours, or within 2,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever is earlier. (3) For airplanes with more than 16,000 total flight hours but with 20,000 total flight hours or less as of the effective date of this AD: Prior to the outboard wing aileron pulley accumulating 20,800 total flight hours, or within 1,300 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever is earlier. (4) For airplanes with more than 20,000 total flight hours as of the effective date of this AD: Within 800 flight hours after the effective date of this AD. Note 1: The actions required by paragraphs (g) of this AD may be done by inserting a copy of Bombardier TR 1–41, dated October 22, 2010, into Section 2—Systems/ Powerplant Program of Part 1 of the Bombardier CL–600–2C10, CL–600–2D15, CL–600–2D24, CL–600–2E25 MRM. When this TR has been included in the general revisions of the MRM, the general revisions may be inserted in the MRM, and the TR may be removed from the MRM, provided that the relevant information in the general revision is identical to that in Bombardier TR 1–41, dated October 22, 2010. No Alternative Actions or Intervals (h) After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No differences. Related Information (j) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil Aviation Airworthiness Directive CF–2011– 07, dated April 26, 2011; and Bombardier Temporary Revision 1–41, dated October 22, 2010, to Section 2—Systems/Powerplant Program of Part 1 of the Bombardier CL–600– 2C10, CL–600–2D15, CL–600–2D24, CL–600– 2E25 MRM; for related information. Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 31, 2011. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2011–28835 Filed 11–7–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–1226; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–006–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM 08NOP1 69164 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). ACTION: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: SUMMARY: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS A recent safety review revealed that the fuel crossfeed valves cannot be controlled when only emergency electrical power is available. This condition, if not corrected, could (in combination with other factors) prevent an in-flight engine re-light following a double engine flame-out event, possibly resulting in loss of the aeroplane. * * * * * The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 23, 2011. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Fokker Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150 AE Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)252– 627–350; fax +31 (0)252–627–211; email technicalservices.fokker services@stork.com; Internet https:// www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (425) 227– 1221. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:17 Nov 07, 2011 Jkt 226001 Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2011–1226; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–006–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010–0158R1, dated November 8, 2010 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: A recent safety review revealed that the fuel crossfeed valves cannot be controlled when only emergency electrical power is available. This condition, if not corrected, could (in combination with other factors) prevent an in-flight engine re-light following a double engine flame-out event, possibly resulting in loss of the aeroplane. Another review revealed that an unwanted configuration of the fuel fire shut-off valve indication logic had been introduced during production on a limited number of F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes. Furthermore, most of the current fuel crossfeed indications are based on the crossfeed selection made by the flight crew PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 and not on the actual positions of the crossfeed valve actuators. In combination with other factors, the current crossfeed indications may mislead flight crews, possibly resulting in single engine in-flight shutdowns and/or unnecessary precautionary landings. For the reasons described above, this AD requires modifications of the crossfeed valve control and power supply, of the crossfeed indication logic and power supply and of the fuel fire shut-off valve indication logic. * * * * * Required actions also include modifying the overhead panel (introduce provisions for a modified crossfeed indication), and for certain airplanes modifying the transfer logic of the center wing fuel tank. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. Relevant Service Information Fokker Services B.V. has issued the following service bulletins: • Fokker Profroma Service Bulletin SBF100–28–043, Revision 1, dated March 31, 2009, including Appendix II, Revision 2, dated July 22, 2010, including the following drawings: • Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 009, Issue F, dated March 31, 2009; • Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 016, Issue N, dated March 31, 2009; • Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 018, Issue S, dated March 31, 2009; and • Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheet 159, Issue ED, dated October 2, 2009. • Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28– 047, Revision 3, dated May 2, 2011, including Fokker Manual Change Notification—Operational Documentation MCNO–F100–060, dated June 10, 2011, and Manual Change Notification—Operational Document MCNO–F100–049, Revision 1, dated May 30, 2011, including the following drawings: • Fokker Drawing D42770, Sheet 6, Issue U, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing D42780, Sheet 6, Issue T, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 100, Issue GB, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 101, Issue FW, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 010 and 012, Issue J, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 011, 013, and 015, Issue U, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 014, 019, and 020, Issue S, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM 08NOP1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules 017, Issue Q, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 063, 064, 065, 066, 069, 071, and 074, Issue DY, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 067, 068, 070, 072, and 073, Issue DW, dated May 2, 2011; • Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 71, Issue DL, dated April 21, 2009; • Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 74, Issue DN, dated July 16, 2010; • Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheets 30 through 36, Issue BL, dated March 30, 2009; • Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheet 37, Issue BP, dated March 30, 2009; and • Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheets 161 and 162, Issue FC, July 9, 2010. • Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28– 052, dated June 15, 2009, including Fokker Manual Change Notification—Operational Documentation MCNO–F100–052 and Manual Change Notification— Maintenance Documentation MCNM–F100–126, dated June 15, 2009, including the following drawings: • Fokker Drawing D42126, Sheet 38, Issue AR, dated October 6, 1993; • Fokker Drawing D42213, Sheet 2, Issue H, dated May 23, 1990; • Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 60, Issue V, dated September 1, 1991; • Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 71, Issue AQ, dated June 7, 1993; • Fokker Drawing D42250, Sheet 23, Issue U, dated April 1993. The actions described in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:17 Nov 07, 2011 Jkt 226001 these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information. We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD. Costs of Compliance Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 6 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 86 work-hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $4,180 per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $68,940, or $11,490 per product. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 69165 For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: Fokker Services B.V: Docket No. FAA–2011– 1226; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM– 006–AD. Comments Due Date (a) We must receive comments by December 23, 2011. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers 11244 through 11585 inclusive. Subject (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel. Reason (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states: A recent safety review revealed that the fuel crossfeed valves cannot be controlled when only emergency electrical power is available. This condition, if not corrected, could (in combination with other factors) prevent an in-flight engine re-light following a double engine flame-out event, possibly resulting in loss of the aeroplane. * E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM * * 08NOP1 * * 69166 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Compliance (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Actions (g) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, modify the crossfeed valve control and power supply, the crossfeed indication logic and power supply, and the fuel fire shut-off valve indication logic, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28–047, Revision 3, dated May 2, 2011, including Fokker Manual Change Notification—Operational Documentation MCNO–F100–060, dated June 10, 2011, and Manual Change Notification—Operational Document MCNO–F100–049, Revision 1, dated May 30, 2011, including the drawings specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(15) of this AD. (1) Fokker Drawing D42770, Sheet 6, Issue U, dated May 2, 2011. (2) Fokker Drawing D42780, Sheet 6, Issue T, dated May 2, 2011. (3) Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 100, Issue GB, dated May 2, 2011. (4) Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 101, Issue FW, dated May 2, 2011. (5) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 010 and 012, Issue J, dated May 2, 2011. (6) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 011, 013, and 015, Issue U, dated May 2, 2011. (7) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 014, 019, and 020, Issue S, dated May 2, 2011. (8) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 017, Issue Q, dated May 2, 2011. (9) Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 063, 064, 065, 066, 069, 071, and 074, Issue DY, dated May 2, 2011. (10) Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 067, 068, 070, 072, and 073, Issue DW, dated May 2, 2011. (11) Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 71, Issue DL, dated April 21, 2009. (12) Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 74, Issue DN, dated July 16, 2010. (13) Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheets 30 through 36, Issue BL, dated March 30, 2009; (14) Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheet 37, Issue BP, dated March 30, 2009. (15) Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheets 161 and 162, Issue FC, July 9, 2010. (h) Before or concurrent with the modification specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, do the applicable actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD: (1) For all airplanes: Modify the overhead panel (introduce provisions for a modified crossfeed indication) in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker Profroma Service Bulletin SBF100–28–043, Revision 1, dated March 31, 2009, including Appendix II, Revision 2, dated July 22, 2010, including the drawings specified in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) through (h)(1)(iv) of this AD. (i) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 009, Issue F, dated March 31, 2009. (ii) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 016, Issue N, dated March 31, 2009. (iii) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 018, Issue S, dated March 31, 2009. (iv) Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheet 159, Issue ED, dated October 2, 2009. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:17 Nov 07, 2011 Jkt 226001 (2) For airplanes with serial numbers 11442 through 11585, equipped with the automatic fuel transfer system: Modify the transfer logic of the center wing fuel tank, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28–052, including Fokker Manual Change Notification—Operational Documentation MCNO–F100–052 and Manual Change Notification—Maintenance Documentation MCNM–F100–126, dated June 15, 2009, including the drawings specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through (h)(2)(v) of this AD. (i) Fokker Drawing D42126, Sheet 38, Issue AR, October 6, 1993. (ii) Fokker Drawing D42213, Sheet 2, Issue H, dated May 23, 1990. (iii) Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 60, Issue V, dated September 1, 1991. (iv) Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 71, Issue AQ, dated June 7, 1993. (v) Fokker Drawing D42250, Sheet 23, Issue U, dated April 1993. Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service Information (i) Modifications accomplished before the effective date of this AD according to the service bulletins specified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), (i)(3), and (i)(4) of this AD, as applicable, are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action specified in this AD. (1) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28– 043, including Appendix II, dated March 31, 2009. (2) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28– 047, Revision 2, dated August 4, 2010. (3) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28– 047, Revision 1, dated July 22, 2010. (4) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–28– 047, dated May 10, 2010. FAA AD Differences Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No differences. Other FAA AD Provisions (j) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. Related Information (k) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2010– 0158R1, dated November 8, 2010; and the service bulletins specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD; for related information. Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 28, 2011. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2011–28836 Filed 11–7–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–1228; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–176–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900), and CL–600–2E25 (Regional Jet Series 1000) airplanes. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: SUMMARY: [I]t was found that the * * * ADG [air driven generator] GCU [generator control unit] transformer primary winding can break due to thermal fatigue. Broken transformer primary winding can prevent the supply of power from the ADG to the essential buses. In the event of an emergency, failure for the essential buses to remain powered can prevent continued safe flight. * * * * * The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. E:\FR\FM\08NOP1.SGM 08NOP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69163-69166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1226; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-006-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

[[Page 69164]]


ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes. 
This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another 
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation 
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    A recent safety review revealed that the fuel crossfeed valves 
cannot be controlled when only emergency electrical power is 
available.
    This condition, if not corrected, could (in combination with 
other factors) prevent an in-flight engine re-light following a 
double engine flame-out event, possibly resulting in loss of the 
aeroplane.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the 
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 23, 
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 
Fokker Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150 AE 
Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)252-627-350; fax +31 
(0)252-627-211; email technicalservices.fokkerservices@stork.com; 
Internet https://www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may review copies of the 
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information 
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (425) 227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory 
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street 
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is 
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket 
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1226; 
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-006-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA 
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0158R1, dated November 8, 2010 (referred 
to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the 
specified products. The MCAI states:

    A recent safety review revealed that the fuel crossfeed valves 
cannot be controlled when only emergency electrical power is 
available.
    This condition, if not corrected, could (in combination with 
other factors) prevent an in-flight engine re-light following a 
double engine flame-out event, possibly resulting in loss of the 
aeroplane.
    Another review revealed that an unwanted configuration of the 
fuel fire shut-off valve indication logic had been introduced during 
production on a limited number of F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes.
    Furthermore, most of the current fuel crossfeed indications are 
based on the crossfeed selection made by the flight crew and not on 
the actual positions of the crossfeed valve actuators. In 
combination with other factors, the current crossfeed indications 
may mislead flight crews, possibly resulting in single engine in-
flight shutdowns and/or unnecessary precautionary landings.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires modifications 
of the crossfeed valve control and power supply, of the crossfeed 
indication logic and power supply and of the fuel fire shut-off 
valve indication logic.
* * * * *

Required actions also include modifying the overhead panel (introduce 
provisions for a modified crossfeed indication), and for certain 
airplanes modifying the transfer logic of the center wing fuel tank. 
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD 
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Fokker Services B.V. has issued the following service bulletins:

 Fokker Profroma Service Bulletin SBF100-28-043, Revision 1, 
dated March 31, 2009, including Appendix II, Revision 2, dated July 22, 
2010, including the following drawings:
     Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 009, Issue F, dated March 31, 
2009;
     Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 016, Issue N, dated March 31, 
2009;
     Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 018, Issue S, dated March 31, 
2009; and
     Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheet 159, Issue ED, dated October 
2, 2009.
 Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-047, Revision 3, dated May 
2, 2011, including Fokker Manual Change Notification--Operational 
Documentation MCNO-F100-060, dated June 10, 2011, and Manual Change 
Notification--Operational Document MCNO-F100-049, Revision 1, dated May 
30, 2011, including the following drawings:
     Fokker Drawing D42770, Sheet 6, Issue U, dated May 2, 
2011;
     Fokker Drawing D42780, Sheet 6, Issue T, dated May 2, 
2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 100, Issue GB, dated May 2, 
2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 101, Issue FW, dated May 2, 
2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 010 and 012, Issue J, dated 
May 2, 2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 011, 013, and 015, Issue U, 
dated May 2, 2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 014, 019, and 020, Issue S, 
dated May 2, 2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet

[[Page 69165]]

017, Issue Q, dated May 2, 2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 063, 064, 065, 066, 069, 
071, and 074, Issue DY, dated May 2, 2011;
     Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 067, 068, 070, 072, and 073, 
Issue DW, dated May 2, 2011;
     Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 71, Issue DL, dated April 21, 
2009;
     Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 74, Issue DN, dated July 16, 
2010;
     Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheets 30 through 36, Issue BL, 
dated March 30, 2009;
     Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheet 37, Issue BP, dated March 30, 
2009; and
     Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheets 161 and 162, Issue FC, July 
9, 2010.
 Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-052, dated June 15, 2009, 
including Fokker Manual Change Notification--Operational Documentation 
MCNO-F100-052 and Manual Change Notification--Maintenance Documentation 
MCNM-F100-126, dated June 15, 2009, including the following drawings:
     Fokker Drawing D42126, Sheet 38, Issue AR, dated October 
6, 1993;
     Fokker Drawing D42213, Sheet 2, Issue H, dated May 23, 
1990;
     Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 60, Issue V, dated September 
1, 1991;
     Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 71, Issue AQ, dated June 7, 
1993;
     Fokker Drawing D42250, Sheet 23, Issue U, dated April 
1993.
The actions described in this service information are intended to 
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have 
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service 
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we 
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition 
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same 
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in 
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it 
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the 
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these 
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information 
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those 
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are 
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD 
would affect about 6 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that 
it would take about 86 work-hours per product to comply with the basic 
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per 
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $4,180 per product. Where 
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered 
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these 
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, 
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these 
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to 
be $68,940, or $11,490 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Fokker Services B.V: Docket No. FAA-2011-1226; Directorate 
Identifier 2011-NM-006-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by December 23, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 0070 
and 0100 airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers 
11244 through 11585 inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 
states:

    A recent safety review revealed that the fuel crossfeed valves 
cannot be controlled when only emergency electrical power is 
available.
    This condition, if not corrected, could (in combination with 
other factors) prevent an in-flight engine re-light following a 
double engine flame-out event, possibly resulting in loss of the 
aeroplane.
* * * * *

[[Page 69166]]

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, modify 
the crossfeed valve control and power supply, the crossfeed 
indication logic and power supply, and the fuel fire shut-off valve 
indication logic, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions 
of Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-047, Revision 3, dated May 2, 
2011, including Fokker Manual Change Notification--Operational 
Documentation MCNO-F100-060, dated June 10, 2011, and Manual Change 
Notification--Operational Document MCNO-F100-049, Revision 1, dated 
May 30, 2011, including the drawings specified in paragraphs (g)(1) 
through (g)(15) of this AD.
    (1) Fokker Drawing D42770, Sheet 6, Issue U, dated May 2, 2011.
    (2) Fokker Drawing D42780, Sheet 6, Issue T, dated May 2, 2011.
    (3) Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 100, Issue GB, dated May 2, 
2011.
    (4) Fokker Drawing W41074, Sheet 101, Issue FW, dated May 2, 
2011.
    (5) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 010 and 012, Issue J, dated 
May 2, 2011.
    (6) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 011, 013, and 015, Issue U, 
dated May 2, 2011.
    (7) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheets 014, 019, and 020, Issue S, 
dated May 2, 2011.
    (8) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 017, Issue Q, dated May 2, 
2011.
    (9) Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 063, 064, 065, 066, 069, 071, 
and 074, Issue DY, dated May 2, 2011.
    (10) Fokker Drawing W41319, Sheets 067, 068, 070, 072, and 073, 
Issue DW, dated May 2, 2011.
    (11) Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 71, Issue DL, dated April 21, 
2009.
    (12) Fokker Drawing W46211, Sheet 74, Issue DN, dated July 16, 
2010.
    (13) Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheets 30 through 36, Issue BL, 
dated March 30, 2009;
    (14) Fokker Drawing W46254, Sheet 37, Issue BP, dated March 30, 
2009.
    (15) Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheets 161 and 162, Issue FC, July 
9, 2010.
    (h) Before or concurrent with the modification specified in 
paragraph (g) of this AD, do the applicable actions specified in 
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD:
    (1) For all airplanes: Modify the overhead panel (introduce 
provisions for a modified crossfeed indication) in accordance with 
the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker Profroma Service Bulletin 
SBF100-28-043, Revision 1, dated March 31, 2009, including Appendix 
II, Revision 2, dated July 22, 2010, including the drawings 
specified in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) through (h)(1)(iv) of this AD.
    (i) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 009, Issue F, dated March 31, 
2009.
    (ii) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 016, Issue N, dated March 31, 
2009.
    (iii) Fokker Drawing W41194, Sheet 018, Issue S, dated March 31, 
2009.
    (iv) Fokker Drawing W59221, Sheet 159, Issue ED, dated October 
2, 2009.
    (2) For airplanes with serial numbers 11442 through 11585, 
equipped with the automatic fuel transfer system: Modify the 
transfer logic of the center wing fuel tank, in accordance with the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-
052, including Fokker Manual Change Notification--Operational 
Documentation MCNO-F100-052 and Manual Change Notification--
Maintenance Documentation MCNM-F100-126, dated June 15, 2009, 
including the drawings specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) through 
(h)(2)(v) of this AD.
    (i) Fokker Drawing D42126, Sheet 38, Issue AR, October 6, 1993.
    (ii) Fokker Drawing D42213, Sheet 2, Issue H, dated May 23, 
1990.
    (iii) Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 60, Issue V, dated September 
1, 1991.
    (iv) Fokker Drawing D42220, Sheet 71, Issue AQ, dated June 7, 
1993.
    (v) Fokker Drawing D42250, Sheet 23, Issue U, dated April 1993.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service 
Information

    (i) Modifications accomplished before the effective date of this 
AD according to the service bulletins specified in paragraphs 
(i)(1), (i)(2), (i)(3), and (i)(4) of this AD, as applicable, are 
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action 
specified in this AD.
    (1) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-043, including Appendix 
II, dated March 31, 2009.
    (2) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-047, Revision 2, dated 
August 4, 2010.
    (3) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-047, Revision 1, dated 
July 22, 2010.
    (4) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-28-047, dated May 10, 2010.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information 
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve 
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as 
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International 
Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify 
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal 
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district 
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter 
must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered 
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority 
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product 
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (k) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness 
Directive 2010-0158R1, dated November 8, 2010; and the service 
bulletins specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD; for 
related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 28, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-28836 Filed 11-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.