Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell), Model 205A-1, 205B, 210, and 212 Helicopters, 68301-68304 [2011-28355]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Amendment 39–16836; Docket No.
FAA–2011–1075; Directorate Identifier
2011–SW–011–AD.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Applicability: Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters, certificated in any category.
Compliance: Before further flight, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent failure of a generator, loss of
electrical power, loss of systems necessary
for flight safety, and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter, do the following:
(a) Revise the ‘‘Emergency and Malfunction
Procedures’’ and the ‘‘Performance Data’’
sections of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual
(RFM) BK117 C–2 by copying or cutting out
temporary pages 7, 8, and 11 (RFM pages 3–
3 and 3–3a for ‘‘Emergency and Malfunction
Procedures’’ and page 5–7 for ‘‘Performance
Data’’) of ECD Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB
MBB BK117 C–2–24A–008, dated December
20, 2010, and inserting the pages into RFM
BK 117 C–2.
(b) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Safety
Management Group, ATTN: George Schwab,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222–
5114, fax (817) 222–5961, for information
about previously approved alternative
methods of compliance.
(c) The Joint Aircraft System/Component
(JASC) Code is 2435: Starter-Generator, 2437:
DC Indicating System, and 2430: DC
Generator System.
(d) Revise the Emergency Procedures and
Performance Data sections of RFM BK 117 C–
2 by inserting the specified portions of ECD
Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB MBB BK117
C–2–24A–008, dated December 20, 2010, into
the RFM. The Director of the Federal Register
approved this incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701
Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75053–4005,
telephone (800) 232–0323, fax (972) 641–
3710, or at https://www.eurocopter.com.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Office
of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth,
Texas, or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.
html.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on
November 21, 2011.
Note: The subject of this AD is addressed
in The European Aviation Safety Agency (the
Federal Republic of Germany) AD No. 2010–
0268–E, dated December 21, 2010.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September
29, 2011.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–27776 Filed 11–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Nov 03, 2011
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1182; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–010–AD; Amendment
39–16853; AD 2011–23–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell
Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell), Model
205A–1, 205B, 210, and 212 Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This amendment supersedes
an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for Bell Model 205B and 212 helicopters
with certain main rotor blade (blade)
assemblies installed. That AD currently
requires washing the upper and lower
surfaces of each blade and visually
inspecting the grip plates, doublers, and
the remaining upper and lower surfaces
of the blades in the area between blade
stations 24.5 to 40 for an edge void,
corrosion, or a crack. This amendment
retains the requirements of that AD for
the affected part-numbered blades but
increases the scope and frequency of the
inspections and expands the
applicability to include the Model
205A–1 and 210 helicopters, additional
blade part numbers, and all helicopter
serial numbers for the affected
helicopter models. This amendment
also requires applying a light coat of
preservative oil (C–125) to all surfaces
of the blade in addition to the
inspection areas as required in the
existing AD. This amendment is
prompted by an additional report of a
fatigue crack on a blade installed on a
Model 212 helicopter. The actions
specified by this AD are intended to
detect an edge void, corrosion, or a
crack on a blade, and to prevent loss of
a blade and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective November 21, 2011.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of November
21, 2011.
We must receive comments on this
AD by January 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68301
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from Bell
Helicopter Textron, Inc., P.O. Box 482,
Fort Worth, TX 76101, telephone (817)
280–3391, fax (817) 280–6466, or at
https://www.bellcustomer.com/files/.
Examining the Docket: You may
examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other
information on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is located in Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building at
the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Kohner, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Rotorcraft Certification Office, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222–5170, fax
(817) 222–5783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 21, 2009, we issued AD 2010–
03–03, Amendment 39–16186 (75 FR
5681, February 4, 2010), to require at
specified intervals washing the upper
and lower surfaces of each blade and
visually inspecting the grip plates,
doublers, and the remaining upper and
lower surfaces of the blades in the area
from blade stations 24.5 to 40 for an
edge void, corrosion, or a crack using a
3x power or higher magnifying glass.
That AD was prompted by two reports
of fatigue cracks on blades installed on
Model 212 helicopters. The cause of the
cracks has been attributed to inadequate
adhesive bonding during manufacture
in the area between the grip plate and
mating doubler surface. A crack first
appears in the grip plate, which can be
detected visually with the blade
installed on the helicopter. That
condition, if not detected, could result
in loss of a blade and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
Since issuing AD 2010–03–03 (75 FR
5681, February 4, 2010), we have
received another report of a fatigue
crack on a blade installed on a Model
212 helicopter. The crack at the blade
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
68302
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
attachment bolt hole has been attributed
to a large disbond, which developed in
the adhesive between the lower grip
plate and mating doubler. The lower
grip plate was not cracked. The disbond
initiated at the tip of the grip plate and
propagated to the blade attachment bolt
hole. Corrosion was found on the
doubler suggesting an edge void was
present for an extended amount of time
and went undetected by the inspections
being performed by the operator.
Further analysis and investigation by
the manufacturer have revealed that the
inspections on the blade as required by
the current AD need to be expanded and
performed at an increased frequency
and on additional part-numbered blades
of similar design and manufacture,
which can also be installed on the
Model 210 and 212 helicopters.
We have also determined that blade
part numbers listed in the current AD
may also be installed on Model 205A–
1 helicopters modified in accordance
with Supplemental Type Certificate
(STC) No. SH5132NM or SH5976NM.
The affected blade can also be installed
on all helicopter serial numbers for the
affected helicopter models. Therefore,
this amendment retains the same
requirements as AD 2010–03–03 (75 FR
5681, February 4, 2010) for the affected
part-numbered blades but increases the
scope and frequency of the inspections
and expands the applicability to include
the Model 205A–1 and 210 helicopters,
additional blade part numbers, and all
helicopter serial numbers for the
affected helicopter models. Finally, after
further investigation, we discovered the
requirement of the current AD to apply
the oil only to the specified inspection
areas was not the original intent of the
AD. Therefore, this AD also requires
applying a light coat of preservative oil
(C–125) to all surfaces of the blade to
prevent corrosion from the process of
washing the blade surfaces in
preparation for the inspections in
addition to those areas as required in
the current AD.
We have reviewed Bell Helicopter
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 205B–
08–51 and ASB No. 212–08–130, both
Revision B and dated January 11, 2011,
applicable to Model 205B and Model
212 helicopters, respectively, and ASB
No. 210–08–03, Revision B, dated
January 10, 2011, applicable to Model
210 helicopters, which describe
procedures for initial and repetitive
inspections of certain part-numbered
blades on certain serial-numbered
helicopters for signs of an edge void,
corrosion, or a crack, including a hairline crack in the blade paint finish in
the inspection area as shown in Figure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Nov 03, 2011
Jkt 226001
1 of the ASBs between blade stations
24.5 and 85.
This AD differs from the ASBs as
follows:
• We specifically require only wiping
each of the bond lines at the edges of
both grip plates and each of the layered
doublers (bond lines) on the upper and
lower surfaces of each affected blade
with an alcohol-soaked cloth. This is
required immediately before performing
a visual inspection using a 3x or higher
magnifying glass and a bright light to
detect an edge delamination along any
of the bond lines. This was done to
avoid any possible confusion with
having to wipe the entire surface blade
area from blade station 24.5 to 85,
which could make performing a reliable
inspection difficult. The ASBs state to
‘‘wipe the area to be inspected with an
alcohol-soaked cloth.’’
• The ASBs use the phrase ‘‘bond
lines between doublers, grip plates, and
skin’’ to describe the bond lines, and we
use ‘‘bond lines at the edges of both grip
plates and each of the layer doublers.’’
• The ASBs use the phrase ‘‘cracks in
the bond lines between doublers or grip
plates’’ to describe a separation of the
doubler or grip plate along an edge, and
we use the term ‘‘edge delamination.’’
• We do not specify each helicopter
serial number (S/N) in our AD; the ASBs
do specify the helicopter S/Ns.
Since an unsafe condition has been
identified that is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of these
same type designs, this AD supersedes
AD 2010–03–03 (75 FR 5681, February
4, 2010), retaining the same
requirements for the affected partnumbered blades but increasing the
scope and frequency of the inspections
and expanding the applicability to
include the Model 205A–1 and 210
helicopters, additional blade part
numbers, and all helicopter serial
numbers for the affected helicopter
models.
The short compliance time involved
is required because the previously
described critical unsafe condition can
adversely affect the structural integrity
and controllability of the helicopter.
Therefore, the AD must be issued
immediately to require the following
actions within 25 hours time-in-service
(TIS) and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 25 hours TIS:
• Washing the upper and lower blade
surfaces using a solution of cleaning
compound (C–318) and water.
• Visually inspecting each of the
upper and lower grip plates and
doublers of the blade for their entire
length and chord width for an edge
void, any corrosion, or a crack.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Wiping each of the bond lines at the
edges of both grip plates and each of the
layered doublers (bond lines) on the
upper and lower surfaces of each
affected blade with an alcohol-soaked
cloth (C–385) in the area from blade
stations 24.5 to 85.
• Immediately thereafter, using a 3x
power or higher magnifying glass and a
bright light, visually inspecting each of
the bond lines on the upper and lower
surfaces of the blade in the inspection
area for any edge delamination, as
indicated by a dark line located along
any bond line, or a crack in the paint
finish.
• Applying a light coat of
preservative oil (C–125) to all surfaces
of the blade.
• Removing paint from areas in
which an edge delamination along any
bond line of a grip plate or doubler, or
a crack in the blade paint finish is
discovered, by sanding with 180–220
grit paper to determine if an edge void
or a crack exists in the blade.
• Replacing any blade that has a crack
in any grip plate or doubler with an
airworthy blade.
• Replacing any blade that has an
edge void or any corrosion with an
airworthy blade or repairing the blade if
the damage is within the maximum
repair damage limits. The maximum
repair damage limitations are contained
in the applicable Component and Repair
Overhaul Manual.
• Replacing any blade that has a crack
in the blade skin with an airworthy
blade, or repairing the blade if the
damage is within the maximum repair
damage limits.
Since a situation exists that requires
the immediate adoption of this
regulation, it is found that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable and that good
cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.
We estimate that this AD will affect
132 helicopters in the U.S. registry. We
also estimate that washing and visually
inspecting each blade will take about 1
work hour. If an edge void, corrosion, or
a crack is found, replacing a blade with
an airworthy blade will take about 24
work hours. The average labor rate is
$85 per work hour. Required parts will
cost about $85,597 for a replacement
blade. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $356,917, assuming that
24 inspections are done each year on
each helicopter and that 1 blade is
replaced.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
we did not precede it by notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
invite you to send any written relevant
data, views, or arguments regarding this
AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include the docket number ‘‘FAA–
2011–1182; Directorate Identifier 2010–
SW–010–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
concerning this AD. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, you can
find and read the comments to any of
our dockets, including the name of the
individual who sent the comment. You
may review the DOT’s complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD. See the AD docket to examine
the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Nov 03, 2011
Jkt 226001
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2010–03–03; Amendment 39–16186 (75
FR 5681, February 4, 2010), and by
adding a new AD to read as follows:
■
2011–23–02 Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.:
Amendment 39–16853; Docket No.
FAA–2011–1182; Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–010–AD. Supersedes AD
2010–03–03, Amendment 39–16186 (75
FR 5681, February 4, 2010), Docket No.
FAA–2010–0065, Directorate Identifier
2009–SW–01–AD.
Applicability: Model 205A–1, 205B, 210
and 212 helicopters with a main rotor blade
(blade), part number (P/N) 204–012–001–023
or –033; 210–015–001–101; 212–015–501–
005, –111, –113, –115, –117, –119, or –121,
installed, certificated in any category.
Note 1: Bell Helicopter Model 205A–1
helicopters, modified by Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) No. SH5132NM or
SH5976NM, may have affected partnumbered blades installed.
Compliance: Required as indicated.
To detect an edge void, corrosion, or a
crack on a blade, to prevent the loss of a
blade and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, do the following:
(a) Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS),
unless accomplished previously, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 25 hours
TIS:
(1) Wash the upper and lower surfaces of
each affected blade with a solution of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68303
cleaning compound (C–318) and water. Rinse
thoroughly and wipe dry.
(2) Visually inspect each of the upper and
lower grip plates and doublers of the blade
for their entire length and chord width for an
edge void, any corrosion, or a crack. Pay
particular attention to any crack in the paint
finish near or at a bond line that follows the
outline of a grip plate or doubler.
Note 2: The inspections required by
paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(4) of this AD do not
require removal of the blades from the main
rotor hub and can be accomplished while the
blades are installed on the helicopter.
(3) Wipe each of the bond lines at the edges
of both grip plates and each of the layered
doublers (bond lines) on the upper and lower
surfaces of each affected blade with an
alcohol-soaked cloth (C–385) in the area from
blade stations 24.5 to 85 (inspection area) as
depicted in Figure 1 of Bell Helicopter Alert
Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 205B–08–51 for
the Model 205B helicopters or ASB No. 212–
08–130 for the Model 212 helicopters (and
the Model 205A–1 helicopters), both
Revision B, and both dated January 11, 2011;
or ASB No. 210–08–03, Revision B, dated
January 10, 2011, for the Model 210
helicopters, as appropriate for your model
helicopter. Wipe dry with a clean cloth.
(4) Immediately after accomplishing
paragraph (a)(3) of this AD, using a 3x power
or higher magnifying glass and a bright light,
visually inspect each of the bond lines on the
upper and lower surfaces of the blade in the
inspection area for any edge delamination, as
indicated by a dark line located along any
bond line, or a crack in the paint finish. An
edge delamination is defined as a separation
of the detail parts along an edge.
Note 3: An edge delamination along the
edge of a grip plate or doubler, or ‘‘any
potential cracks in the bond lines between
doublers or grip plates’’ as described in the
ASBs, is indicated by the presence of excess
alcohol bleeding out of an edge void. The
excess alcohol in the void will appear as a
dark line along the bond line. A crack in the
paint finish which follows the outline of a
grip plate or doubler may indicate a possible
edge void.
(5) If there is no edge void, corrosion,
crack, an edge delamination, or a crack in the
paint finish, apply a light coat of preservative
oil (C–125) to all surfaces of the blade.
(b) Before further flight:
(1) If there is any edge delamination along
any bond line of a grip plate or doubler, or
a crack in the paint finish:
(i) Remove the paint in the affected area by
lightly sanding with 180–220 grit paper in a
span-wise direction to determine if there is
an edge void, or if the grip plate, doubler, or
skin is cracked. If any parent material is
removed during the sanding operation,
replace the blade with an airworthy blade or
repair the blade if the amount of parent
material removed is within the maximum
repair damage limits.
Note 4: The maximum repair damage limits
are contained in the applicable Component
and Repair Overhaul Manual.
(ii) If there is an edge void, determine the
depth and length using a .0015 inch feeler
gauge.
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
68304
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 214 / Friday, November 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) If there is an edge void in a grip plate
or doubler near the outboard tip, tap inspect
the affected area to determine the size and
shape of the void.
(iv) Repair the blade if the edge void is
within the maximum repair damage limits or
replace the blade with an airworthy blade.
(v) If there is not an edge void or a crack,
refinish the sanded area.
(2) If there is a crack in any grip plate or
doubler, replace the blade with an airworthy
blade.
(3) If there is a crack in the blade skin,
replace the blade with an airworthy blade, or
repair the blade if the damage is within the
maximum repair damage limits.
(4) If there is any corrosion, replace the
blade with an airworthy blade or repair the
blade if the damage is within the maximum
repair damage limits.
(c) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Rotorcraft
Certification Office, Attn: Michael Kohner,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft
Directorate, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222–
5170, fax (817) 222–5783, for information
about previously approved alternative
methods of compliance.
(d) The inspection area is depicted in
Figure 1 of Bell Helicopter Alert Service
Bulletin No. 205B–08–51 or No. 212–08–130,
both Revision B, and both dated January 11,
2011; or No. 210–08–03, Revision B, dated
January 10, 2011. The incorporation by
reference of these documents was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register, in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from Bell
Helicopter Textron, Inc., P.O. Box 482, Fort
Worth, TX 76101, telephone (817) 280–3391,
fax (817) 280–6466, or at https://
www.bellcustomer.com/files/. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas, or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC)
Code
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(e) The JASC Code is 6210: Main Rotor
Blades.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on
November 21, 2011.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 21,
2011.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–28355 Filed 11–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Nov 03, 2011
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1163; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–022–AD; Amendment
39–16857; AD 2011–23–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sicma Aero
Seat Passenger Seat Assemblies,
Installed on, But Not Limited to, ATR–
´
GIE Avions de Transport Regional
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Sicma
Aero Seat Model 9401, 9402, 9404,
9405, 9406, 9407, 9408, and 9409 series
passenger seat assemblies, installed on,
but not limited to, ATR–GIE Avions de
´
Transport Regional Model ATR42 and
ATR72 airplanes. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition
on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
Several occurrences of cracked central and
lateral spreaders on passenger seats models
9401 and 9402 * * *.
This condition, if not corrected, can lead
to further cracking of the seat spreaders,
causing injury to passengers or crew
members during heavy turbulence in flight or
in the event of an emergency landing.
*
*
*
*
*
This AD requires actions that are
intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
November 21, 2011.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of November 21, 2011.
We must receive comments on this
AD by December 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Lee, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; telephone (781) 238–7161; fax
(781) 238–7170; email:
jeffrey.lee@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2008–0097,
dated May 20, 2008 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Several occurrences of cracked central and
lateral spreaders on passenger seats models
9401 and 9402 have been reported to Sicma
Aero Seat.
This condition, if not corrected, can lead
to further cracking of the seat spreaders,
causing injury to passengers or crew
members during heavy turbulence in flight or
in the event of an emergency landing.
For the reasons stated above, this [EASA]
Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires
repetitive [detailed] inspections of the
affected seats and, depending on findings,
the repair or replacement of damaged
spreaders with an improved design
(‘Amendment B’ standard). The replacement
of all spreaders (i.e. modification to
‘Amendment B’ standard) terminates the
repetitive inspection requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Sicma Aero Seat has issued the
following service information. The
actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 214 (Friday, November 4, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68301-68304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28355]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1182; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-010-AD;
Amendment 39-16853; AD 2011-23-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell),
Model 205A-1, 205B, 210, and 212 Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for Bell Model 205B and 212 helicopters with certain main rotor
blade (blade) assemblies installed. That AD currently requires washing
the upper and lower surfaces of each blade and visually inspecting the
grip plates, doublers, and the remaining upper and lower surfaces of
the blades in the area between blade stations 24.5 to 40 for an edge
void, corrosion, or a crack. This amendment retains the requirements of
that AD for the affected part-numbered blades but increases the scope
and frequency of the inspections and expands the applicability to
include the Model 205A-1 and 210 helicopters, additional blade part
numbers, and all helicopter serial numbers for the affected helicopter
models. This amendment also requires applying a light coat of
preservative oil (C-125) to all surfaces of the blade in addition to
the inspection areas as required in the existing AD. This amendment is
prompted by an additional report of a fatigue crack on a blade
installed on a Model 212 helicopter. The actions specified by this AD
are intended to detect an edge void, corrosion, or a crack on a blade,
and to prevent loss of a blade and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
DATES: Effective November 21, 2011.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of November 21, 2011.
We must receive comments on this AD by January 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this AD.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this AD from Bell
Helicopter Textron, Inc., P.O. Box 482, Fort Worth, TX 76101, telephone
(817) 280-3391, fax (817) 280-6466, or at https://www.bellcustomer.com/files/.
Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other information on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Kohner, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Certification Office,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5170,
fax (817) 222-5783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 21, 2009, we issued AD 2010-03-
03, Amendment 39-16186 (75 FR 5681, February 4, 2010), to require at
specified intervals washing the upper and lower surfaces of each blade
and visually inspecting the grip plates, doublers, and the remaining
upper and lower surfaces of the blades in the area from blade stations
24.5 to 40 for an edge void, corrosion, or a crack using a 3x power or
higher magnifying glass. That AD was prompted by two reports of fatigue
cracks on blades installed on Model 212 helicopters. The cause of the
cracks has been attributed to inadequate adhesive bonding during
manufacture in the area between the grip plate and mating doubler
surface. A crack first appears in the grip plate, which can be detected
visually with the blade installed on the helicopter. That condition, if
not detected, could result in loss of a blade and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
Since issuing AD 2010-03-03 (75 FR 5681, February 4, 2010), we have
received another report of a fatigue crack on a blade installed on a
Model 212 helicopter. The crack at the blade
[[Page 68302]]
attachment bolt hole has been attributed to a large disbond, which
developed in the adhesive between the lower grip plate and mating
doubler. The lower grip plate was not cracked. The disbond initiated at
the tip of the grip plate and propagated to the blade attachment bolt
hole. Corrosion was found on the doubler suggesting an edge void was
present for an extended amount of time and went undetected by the
inspections being performed by the operator. Further analysis and
investigation by the manufacturer have revealed that the inspections on
the blade as required by the current AD need to be expanded and
performed at an increased frequency and on additional part-numbered
blades of similar design and manufacture, which can also be installed
on the Model 210 and 212 helicopters.
We have also determined that blade part numbers listed in the
current AD may also be installed on Model 205A-1 helicopters modified
in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) No. SH5132NM or
SH5976NM. The affected blade can also be installed on all helicopter
serial numbers for the affected helicopter models. Therefore, this
amendment retains the same requirements as AD 2010-03-03 (75 FR 5681,
February 4, 2010) for the affected part-numbered blades but increases
the scope and frequency of the inspections and expands the
applicability to include the Model 205A-1 and 210 helicopters,
additional blade part numbers, and all helicopter serial numbers for
the affected helicopter models. Finally, after further investigation,
we discovered the requirement of the current AD to apply the oil only
to the specified inspection areas was not the original intent of the
AD. Therefore, this AD also requires applying a light coat of
preservative oil (C-125) to all surfaces of the blade to prevent
corrosion from the process of washing the blade surfaces in preparation
for the inspections in addition to those areas as required in the
current AD.
We have reviewed Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No.
205B-08-51 and ASB No. 212-08-130, both Revision B and dated January
11, 2011, applicable to Model 205B and Model 212 helicopters,
respectively, and ASB No. 210-08-03, Revision B, dated January 10,
2011, applicable to Model 210 helicopters, which describe procedures
for initial and repetitive inspections of certain part-numbered blades
on certain serial-numbered helicopters for signs of an edge void,
corrosion, or a crack, including a hair-line crack in the blade paint
finish in the inspection area as shown in Figure 1 of the ASBs between
blade stations 24.5 and 85.
This AD differs from the ASBs as follows:
We specifically require only wiping each of the bond lines
at the edges of both grip plates and each of the layered doublers (bond
lines) on the upper and lower surfaces of each affected blade with an
alcohol-soaked cloth. This is required immediately before performing a
visual inspection using a 3x or higher magnifying glass and a bright
light to detect an edge delamination along any of the bond lines. This
was done to avoid any possible confusion with having to wipe the entire
surface blade area from blade station 24.5 to 85, which could make
performing a reliable inspection difficult. The ASBs state to ``wipe
the area to be inspected with an alcohol-soaked cloth.''
The ASBs use the phrase ``bond lines between doublers,
grip plates, and skin'' to describe the bond lines, and we use ``bond
lines at the edges of both grip plates and each of the layer
doublers.''
The ASBs use the phrase ``cracks in the bond lines between
doublers or grip plates'' to describe a separation of the doubler or
grip plate along an edge, and we use the term ``edge delamination.''
We do not specify each helicopter serial number (S/N) in
our AD; the ASBs do specify the helicopter S/Ns.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of these same type designs, this
AD supersedes AD 2010-03-03 (75 FR 5681, February 4, 2010), retaining
the same requirements for the affected part-numbered blades but
increasing the scope and frequency of the inspections and expanding the
applicability to include the Model 205A-1 and 210 helicopters,
additional blade part numbers, and all helicopter serial numbers for
the affected helicopter models.
The short compliance time involved is required because the
previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the
structural integrity and controllability of the helicopter. Therefore,
the AD must be issued immediately to require the following actions
within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 25 hours TIS:
Washing the upper and lower blade surfaces using a
solution of cleaning compound (C-318) and water.
Visually inspecting each of the upper and lower grip
plates and doublers of the blade for their entire length and chord
width for an edge void, any corrosion, or a crack.
Wiping each of the bond lines at the edges of both grip
plates and each of the layered doublers (bond lines) on the upper and
lower surfaces of each affected blade with an alcohol-soaked cloth (C-
385) in the area from blade stations 24.5 to 85.
Immediately thereafter, using a 3x power or higher
magnifying glass and a bright light, visually inspecting each of the
bond lines on the upper and lower surfaces of the blade in the
inspection area for any edge delamination, as indicated by a dark line
located along any bond line, or a crack in the paint finish.
Applying a light coat of preservative oil (C-125) to all
surfaces of the blade.
Removing paint from areas in which an edge delamination
along any bond line of a grip plate or doubler, or a crack in the blade
paint finish is discovered, by sanding with 180-220 grit paper to
determine if an edge void or a crack exists in the blade.
Replacing any blade that has a crack in any grip plate or
doubler with an airworthy blade.
Replacing any blade that has an edge void or any corrosion
with an airworthy blade or repairing the blade if the damage is within
the maximum repair damage limits. The maximum repair damage limitations
are contained in the applicable Component and Repair Overhaul Manual.
Replacing any blade that has a crack in the blade skin
with an airworthy blade, or repairing the blade if the damage is within
the maximum repair damage limits.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
We estimate that this AD will affect 132 helicopters in the U.S.
registry. We also estimate that washing and visually inspecting each
blade will take about 1 work hour. If an edge void, corrosion, or a
crack is found, replacing a blade with an airworthy blade will take
about 24 work hours. The average labor rate is $85 per work hour.
Required parts will cost about $85,597 for a replacement blade. Based
on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $356,917, assuming that 24 inspections are done each
year on each helicopter and that 1 blade is replaced.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and
[[Page 68303]]
we did not precede it by notice and an opportunity for public comment.
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2011-1182;
Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-010-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this AD. Using the search function of the docket Web
site, you can find and read the comments to any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You may
review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2010-03-03; Amendment 39-16186 (75 FR 5681, February 4, 2010), and by
adding a new AD to read as follows:
2011-23-02 Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.: Amendment 39-16853; Docket
No. FAA-2011-1182; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-010-AD. Supersedes
AD 2010-03-03, Amendment 39-16186 (75 FR 5681, February 4, 2010),
Docket No. FAA-2010-0065, Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-01-AD.
Applicability: Model 205A-1, 205B, 210 and 212 helicopters with
a main rotor blade (blade), part number (P/N) 204-012-001-023 or -
033; 210-015-001-101; 212-015-501-005, -111, -113, -115, -117, -119,
or -121, installed, certificated in any category.
Note 1: Bell Helicopter Model 205A-1 helicopters, modified by
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) No. SH5132NM or SH5976NM, may
have affected part-numbered blades installed.
Compliance: Required as indicated.
To detect an edge void, corrosion, or a crack on a blade, to
prevent the loss of a blade and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, do the following:
(a) Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS), unless accomplished
previously, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 25 hours TIS:
(1) Wash the upper and lower surfaces of each affected blade
with a solution of cleaning compound (C-318) and water. Rinse
thoroughly and wipe dry.
(2) Visually inspect each of the upper and lower grip plates and
doublers of the blade for their entire length and chord width for an
edge void, any corrosion, or a crack. Pay particular attention to
any crack in the paint finish near or at a bond line that follows
the outline of a grip plate or doubler.
Note 2: The inspections required by paragraphs (a)(2) and
(a)(4) of this AD do not require removal of the blades from the main
rotor hub and can be accomplished while the blades are installed on
the helicopter.
(3) Wipe each of the bond lines at the edges of both grip plates
and each of the layered doublers (bond lines) on the upper and lower
surfaces of each affected blade with an alcohol-soaked cloth (C-385)
in the area from blade stations 24.5 to 85 (inspection area) as
depicted in Figure 1 of Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB)
No. 205B-08-51 for the Model 205B helicopters or ASB No. 212-08-130
for the Model 212 helicopters (and the Model 205A-1 helicopters),
both Revision B, and both dated January 11, 2011; or ASB No. 210-08-
03, Revision B, dated January 10, 2011, for the Model 210
helicopters, as appropriate for your model helicopter. Wipe dry with
a clean cloth.
(4) Immediately after accomplishing paragraph (a)(3) of this AD,
using a 3x power or higher magnifying glass and a bright light,
visually inspect each of the bond lines on the upper and lower
surfaces of the blade in the inspection area for any edge
delamination, as indicated by a dark line located along any bond
line, or a crack in the paint finish. An edge delamination is
defined as a separation of the detail parts along an edge.
Note 3: An edge delamination along the edge of a grip plate or
doubler, or ``any potential cracks in the bond lines between
doublers or grip plates'' as described in the ASBs, is indicated by
the presence of excess alcohol bleeding out of an edge void. The
excess alcohol in the void will appear as a dark line along the bond
line. A crack in the paint finish which follows the outline of a
grip plate or doubler may indicate a possible edge void.
(5) If there is no edge void, corrosion, crack, an edge
delamination, or a crack in the paint finish, apply a light coat of
preservative oil (C-125) to all surfaces of the blade.
(b) Before further flight:
(1) If there is any edge delamination along any bond line of a
grip plate or doubler, or a crack in the paint finish:
(i) Remove the paint in the affected area by lightly sanding
with 180-220 grit paper in a span-wise direction to determine if
there is an edge void, or if the grip plate, doubler, or skin is
cracked. If any parent material is removed during the sanding
operation, replace the blade with an airworthy blade or repair the
blade if the amount of parent material removed is within the maximum
repair damage limits.
Note 4: The maximum repair damage limits are contained in the
applicable Component and Repair Overhaul Manual.
(ii) If there is an edge void, determine the depth and length
using a .0015 inch feeler gauge.
[[Page 68304]]
(iii) If there is an edge void in a grip plate or doubler near
the outboard tip, tap inspect the affected area to determine the
size and shape of the void.
(iv) Repair the blade if the edge void is within the maximum
repair damage limits or replace the blade with an airworthy blade.
(v) If there is not an edge void or a crack, refinish the sanded
area.
(2) If there is a crack in any grip plate or doubler, replace
the blade with an airworthy blade.
(3) If there is a crack in the blade skin, replace the blade
with an airworthy blade, or repair the blade if the damage is within
the maximum repair damage limits.
(4) If there is any corrosion, replace the blade with an
airworthy blade or repair the blade if the damage is within the
maximum repair damage limits.
(c) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Attn: Michael
Kohner, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5170,
fax (817) 222-5783, for information about previously approved
alternative methods of compliance.
(d) The inspection area is depicted in Figure 1 of Bell
Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 205B-08-51 or No. 212-08-130,
both Revision B, and both dated January 11, 2011; or No. 210-08-03,
Revision B, dated January 10, 2011. The incorporation by reference
of these documents was approved by the Director of the Federal
Register, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Copies may be obtained from Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., P.O. Box
482, Fort Worth, TX 76101, telephone (817) 280-3391, fax (817) 280-
6466, or at https://www.bellcustomer.com/files/. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas, or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code
(e) The JASC Code is 6210: Main Rotor Blades.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on November 21, 2011.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 21, 2011.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-28355 Filed 11-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P