Proposed Settlement Agreement, 67728-67729 [2011-28389]
Download as PDF
67728
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
Docket
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 2, 2011 / Notices
ER09–833 ........................................
ER09–1224 ......................................
ER10–794 ........................................
ER10–1350 ......................................
ER10–1676 ......................................
ER10–2001 ......................................
ER10–2161 ......................................
ER10–2748 ......................................
ER10–3357 ......................................
ER11–2131 ......................................
ER11–2132 ......................................
ER11–2133 ......................................
ER11–2134 ......................................
ER11–2135 ......................................
ER11–2136 ......................................
ER11–2161 ......................................
ER11–3156 ......................................
ER11–3157 ......................................
ER11–3274 ......................................
ER11–3728 ......................................
ER11–3657 ......................................
ER11–3658 ......................................
These meetings are open to the
public.
For more information, contact Patrick
Clarey, Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission at (317) 249–5937 or
patrick.clarey@ferc.gov.
Dated: October 27, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–28394 Filed 11–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9485–8]
Proposed Settlement Agreement
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement
agreement; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with section
113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended
(‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is
hereby given of a proposed settlement
agreement to address a lawsuit filed by
the Engine Manufacturers Association,
in the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit:
Engine Manufacturers Association v.
EPA, No. 10–1331 (DC Cir.). Petitioners
filed a petition for review of an EPA rule
that revised the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines (the RICE NESHAP). Under the
terms of the proposed settlement
agreement, EPA anticipates that, by June
15, 2012, the Agency will sign a notice
of proposed rulemaking that includes a
proposal to revise the RICE NESHAP to
allow owners and operators of spark-
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Nov 01, 2011
Jkt 226001
Entergy Services, Inc.
Entergy Services, Inc.
Entergy Services, Inc.
Entergy Services, Inc.
Entergy Services, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Entergy Texas, Inc.
Entergy Services, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana, LLC
Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana, LLC
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Entergy Texas, Inc.
Entergy Texas, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
ignition 4-stroke rich burn engines that
meet an emission standard requiring a
76 percent or greater reduction of the
pollutant formaldehyde, to prove
compliance with the standard based on
approved testing that shows at least a
thirty percent reduction in total
hydrocarbons and that, by March 14,
2013, the Administrator of EPA will
sign a final action on this proposal,
which may include signature of a final
rule by the Administrator. If EPA
promulgates in final form an
amendment to the RICE NESHAP that
includes changes that are substantially
the same substance as that set forth in
the settlement agreement, then EMA
shall promptly file a stipulation of
dismissal of No. 10–1331.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed settlement agreement must be
received by December 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2011–0869, online at
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method); by email to
oei.docket@epa.gov; by mail to EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by
hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket
Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. Comments on a disk or CD–
ROM should be formatted in Word or
ASCII file, avoiding the use of special
characters and any form of encryption,
and may be mailed to the mailing
address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Horowitz, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2344A), Office of General
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202)
564–5583; fax number (202) 564–5603;
email address:
horowitz.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Settlement Agreement
This proposed settlement agreement
would potentially resolve a petition for
judicial review filed by Engine
Manufacturers Association (EMA) for
review of a rule promulgating standards
that revised the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines (the RICE NESHAP), 75 FR
51570 (August 20, 2010). The RICE
NESHAP requires certain subcategories
of four-stroke rich burn spark-ignition
RICE to meet an emission standard
requiring a 76 percent or greater
reduction of the pollutant
formaldehyde.
EMA filed a petition for review
regarding these provisions. Discussions
with EMA indicate that compliance
with the standard can be proven based
on approved testing that shows at least
a thirty percent reduction in total
hydrocarbons.
Under the terms of the proposed
settlement agreement, EPA states that it
anticipates that, by June 15, 2012, it will
sign a notice of proposed rulemaking
that includes a proposal to revise these
provisions to allow owners and
operators of spark-ignition four-stroke
rich burn engines that meet an emission
standard requiring a 76 percent or
greater reduction of the pollutant
formaldehyde, to prove compliance
with the standard based on approved
testing that shows at least a thirty
percent reduction in total hydrocarbons
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 212 / Wednesday, November 2, 2011 / Notices
and that by March 14, 2013, the
Administrator of EPA will sign a final
action on this proposal, which may
include signature of a final rule by the
Administrator. Under the proposed
settlement agreement, if EPA fails to
sign the proposal by June 15, 2012, or
to take final action on the proposal by
March 14, 2013, EMA may move the
Court to lift the order staying
proceedings and establish a briefing
schedule. Petitioners shall have no
further remedy under the agreement.
Under the proposed settlement
agreement, if the relevant provisions of
the final rule are in substantial
conformance with the revisions in the
proposed agreement, then EMA agrees
to dismiss the petition for review.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will accept written
comments relating to the proposed
settlement agreement from persons who
were not named as parties or
intervenors to the litigation in question.
EPA or the Department of Justice may
withdraw or withhold consent to the
proposed settlement agreement if the
comments disclose facts or
considerations that indicate that such
consent is inappropriate, improper,
inadequate, or inconsistent with the
requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or
the Department of Justice determines,
based on any comment submitted, that
consent to this settlement agreement
should be withdrawn, the terms of the
agreement will be affirmed.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed
Settlement Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the
settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this
action (identified by Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OGC–2011–0869) contains a
copy of the proposed settlement
agreement. The official public docket is
available for public viewing at the
Office of Environmental Information
(OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566–
1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the
www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 Nov 01, 2011
Jkt 226001
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search’’.
It is important to note that EPA’s
policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing online at www.regulations.gov
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period. Comments received after the
close of the comment period will be
marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to
consider these late comments.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web
site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67729
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, email address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an email comment
directly to the Docket without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA’s
electronic public docket.
Dated: October 20, 2011.
Kevin McLean,
Acting Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–28389 Filed 11–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid control number. No
person shall be subject to any penalty
for failing to comply with a collection
of information subject to the PRA that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to
further reduce the information
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67728-67729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28389]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9485-8]
Proposed Settlement Agreement
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement; request for public
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a
proposed settlement agreement to address a lawsuit filed by the Engine
Manufacturers Association, in the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit: Engine Manufacturers Association v.
EPA, No. 10-1331 (DC Cir.). Petitioners filed a petition for review of
an EPA rule that revised the National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (the RICE
NESHAP). Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, EPA
anticipates that, by June 15, 2012, the Agency will sign a notice of
proposed rulemaking that includes a proposal to revise the RICE NESHAP
to allow owners and operators of spark-ignition 4-stroke rich burn
engines that meet an emission standard requiring a 76 percent or
greater reduction of the pollutant formaldehyde, to prove compliance
with the standard based on approved testing that shows at least a
thirty percent reduction in total hydrocarbons and that, by March 14,
2013, the Administrator of EPA will sign a final action on this
proposal, which may include signature of a final rule by the
Administrator. If EPA promulgates in final form an amendment to the
RICE NESHAP that includes changes that are substantially the same
substance as that set forth in the settlement agreement, then EMA shall
promptly file a stipulation of dismissal of No. 10-1331.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by December 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2011-0869, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method);
by email to oei.docket@epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Horowitz, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone: (202) 564-5583; fax number (202) 564-5603; email address:
horowitz.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement
This proposed settlement agreement would potentially resolve a
petition for judicial review filed by Engine Manufacturers Association
(EMA) for review of a rule promulgating standards that revised the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (the RICE NESHAP), 75 FR
51570 (August 20, 2010). The RICE NESHAP requires certain subcategories
of four-stroke rich burn spark-ignition RICE to meet an emission
standard requiring a 76 percent or greater reduction of the pollutant
formaldehyde.
EMA filed a petition for review regarding these provisions.
Discussions with EMA indicate that compliance with the standard can be
proven based on approved testing that shows at least a thirty percent
reduction in total hydrocarbons.
Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, EPA states
that it anticipates that, by June 15, 2012, it will sign a notice of
proposed rulemaking that includes a proposal to revise these provisions
to allow owners and operators of spark-ignition four-stroke rich burn
engines that meet an emission standard requiring a 76 percent or
greater reduction of the pollutant formaldehyde, to prove compliance
with the standard based on approved testing that shows at least a
thirty percent reduction in total hydrocarbons
[[Page 67729]]
and that by March 14, 2013, the Administrator of EPA will sign a final
action on this proposal, which may include signature of a final rule by
the Administrator. Under the proposed settlement agreement, if EPA
fails to sign the proposal by June 15, 2012, or to take final action on
the proposal by March 14, 2013, EMA may move the Court to lift the
order staying proceedings and establish a briefing schedule.
Petitioners shall have no further remedy under the agreement.
Under the proposed settlement agreement, if the relevant provisions
of the final rule are in substantial conformance with the revisions in
the proposed agreement, then EMA agrees to dismiss the petition for
review.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the
proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as
parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed
settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate,
or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the
Department of Justice determines, based on any comment submitted, that
consent to this settlement agreement should be withdrawn, the terms of
the agreement will be affirmed.
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2011-0869) contains a copy of the proposed settlement
agreement. The official public docket is available for public viewing
at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA
Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-
1752.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in
the appropriate docket identification number then select ``search''.
It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Dated: October 20, 2011.
Kevin McLean,
Acting Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-28389 Filed 11-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P