Visas: Documentation of Immigrants Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended, 67361-67363 [2011-28281]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) New activities may be exempted
from the prohibitions in paragraphs
(a)(2) through (8) of this section by the
Director after consultation between the
Director and the Department of Defense.
If it is determined that an activity may
be carried out such activity shall be
carried out in a manner that avoids to
the maximum extent practicable any
adverse impact on Sanctuary resources
and qualities. Civil engineering and
other civil works projects conducted by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are
excluded from the scope of this
paragraph (d).
(2) The Department of Defense is
prohibited from conducting bombing
activities within the Sanctuary.
(3) In the event of threatened or actual
destruction of, loss of, or injury to a
Sanctuary resource or quality resulting
from an untoward incident, including
but not limited to spills and groundings
caused by the Department of Defense,
the Department of Defense shall
promptly coordinate with the Director
for the purpose of taking appropriate
actions to respond to and mitigate the
harm and, if possible, restore or replace
the Sanctuary resource or quality.
(e) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(a)(2) through (8) of this section do not
apply to any activity executed in
accordance with the scope, purpose,
terms and conditions of a National
Marine Sanctuary permit issued
pursuant to §§ 922.48 and 922.153 or a
Special Use permit issued pursuant to
section 310 of the Act.
(f) Members of a federally recognized
Indian tribe may exercise aboriginal and
treaty-secured rights, subject to the
requirements of other applicable law,
without regard to the requirements of
this part. The Director may consult with
the governing body of a tribe regarding
ways the tribe may exercise such rights
consistent with the purposes of the
Sanctuary.
(g) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(a)(2) through (8) of this section do not
apply to any activity authorized by any
lease, permit, license, or other
authorization issued after July 22, 1994,
and issued by any Federal, State or local
authority of competent jurisdiction,
provided that the applicant complies
with § 922.49, the Director notifies the
applicant and authorizing agency that
he or she does not object to issuance of
the authorization, and the applicant
complies with any terms and conditions
the Director deems necessary to protect
Sanctuary resources and qualities.
Amendments, renewals and extensions
of authorizations in existence on the
effective date of designation constitute
authorizations issued after the effective
date.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 226001
(h) Notwithstanding paragraphs (e)
and (g) of this section, in no event may
the Director issue a National Marine
Sanctuary permit under §§ 922.48 and
922.153 or a Special Use permit under
section 310 of the Act authorizing, or
otherwise approve: The exploration for,
development or production of oil, gas or
minerals within the Sanctuary; the
discharge of primary-treated sewage
within the Sanctuary; the disposal of
dredged material within the Sanctuary
other than in connection with beach
nourishment projects related to the
Quillayute River Navigation Project; or
bombing activities within the Sanctuary.
Any purported authorizations issued by
other authorities after July 22, 1994 for
any of these activities within the
Sanctuary shall be invalid.
■ 5. Section 922.153 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 922.153
Permit procedures and criteria.
(a) A person may conduct an activity
prohibited by § 922.152(a)(2) through (8)
if conducted in accordance with the
scope, purpose, terms and conditions of
a permit issued under this section and
§ 922.48.
(b) Applications for such permits
should be addressed to the Director,
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries;
Attn: Superintendent, Olympic Coast
National Marine Sanctuary, 115 East
Railroad Avenue, Suite 301, Port
Angeles, WA 98362–2925.
(c) The Director, at his or her
discretion, may issue a permit, subject
to such terms and conditions as he or
she deems appropriate, to conduct an
activity prohibited by § 922.152(a)(2)
through (8), if the Director finds that the
activity will not substantially injure
Sanctuary resources and qualities and
will: Further research related to
Sanctuary resources and qualities;
further the educational, natural or
historical resource value of the
Sanctuary; further salvage or recovery
operations in or near the Sanctuary in
connection with a recent air or marine
casualty; assist in managing the
Sanctuary; further salvage or recovery
operations in connections with an
abandoned shipwreck in the Sanctuary
title to which is held by the State of
Washington; or be issued to an
American Indian tribe adjacent to the
Sanctuary, and/or its designee as
certified by the governing body of the
tribe, to promote or enhance tribal selfdetermination, tribal government
functions, the exercise of treaty rights,
the economic development of the tribe,
subsistence, ceremonial and spiritual
activities, or the education or training of
tribal members. For the purpose of this
part, American Indian tribes adjacent to
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67361
the sanctuary mean the Hoh, Makah,
and Quileute Indian Tribes and the
Quinault Indian Nation. In deciding
whether to issue a permit, the Director
may consider such factors as: The
professional qualifications and financial
ability of the applicant as related to the
proposed activity; the duration of the
activity and the duration of its effects;
the appropriateness of the methods and
procedures proposed by the applicant
for the conduct of the activity; the
extent to which the conduct of the
activity may diminish or enhance
Sanctuary resources and qualities; the
cumulative effects of the activity; the
end value of the activity; and the
impacts of the activity on adjacent
American Indian tribes. Where the
issuance or denial of a permit is
requested by the governing body of an
American Indian tribe, the Director shall
consider and protect the interests of the
tribe to the fullest extent practicable in
keeping with the purposes of the
Sanctuary and his or her fiduciary
duties to the tribe. The Director may
also deny a permit application pursuant
to this section, in whole or in part, if it
is determined that the permittee or
applicant has acted in violation of the
terms or conditions of a permit or of
these regulations. In addition, the
Director may consider such other factors
as he or she deems appropriate.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–27947 Filed 10–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice 7391]
RIN 1400–AC86
Visas: Documentation of Immigrants
Under the Immigration and Nationality
Act, as Amended
State Department.
Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This rule amends the
Department of State’s regulations
relating to adoptions in countries party
to The Hague Convention on the
Protection of Children and Co-operation
in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, to
include new adoption provisions from
the International Adoption
Simplification Act. This legislation
provides for sibling adoption to include
certain children who are under the age
of 18 at the time the petition is filed on
their behalf, and also certain children
who attained the age of 18 on or after
April 1, 2008 and who are the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
67362
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
beneficiaries of a petition filed on or
before November 30, 2012.
DATES:
Effective Date: This rule is effective
November 1, 2011.
Comment Date: The Department will
accept comments from the public up to
December 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments by any of
the following methods:
• Email: BeaumontTW@state.gov
(Subject line must read IASA Sibling
Reg.).
• Mail: Chief, Legislation and
Regulation Division, Visa Services—
IASA Sibling Reg., 2401 E. Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20520–30106.
• ‘‘Persons with access to the Internet
may view this notice and provide
comments by going to the
regulations.gov Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/index.cfm, and
searching on the Public Notice number
7391.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Taylor W. Beaumont, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services,
Department of State, 2401 E Street, NW.,
Room L–603D, Washington, DC 20520–
0106, who may be reached at (202) 663–
1202.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
As used in this public notice, the term
‘‘Convention’’ means The Hague
Convention on Protection of Children
and Co-operation in Respect of
Intercountry Adoption; the term
‘‘Convention country’’ means a country
that is a party to the Convention and
with which the Convention is in force
for the United States; and the term
‘‘IASA’’ means the International
Adoption Simplification Act, Public
Law 111–287 (2010).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Why is the Department promulgating
this rule?
On November 30, 2010, the President
signed the IASA into law, modifying the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)
as regards adoptions from Convention
countries. Among other changes, the
IASA creates a new INA Section
101(b)(1)(G)(iii) to allow U.S. citizens to
file an immediate relative petition for a
child younger than 18 from a
Convention country, provided that child
is the natural sibling of a child
concurrently or already adopted or
being brought to the United States for
adoption under INA Sections
101(b)(1)(E)(i), (F)(i), or (G)(i). To qualify
as a child who is covered under INA
Section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii), a child must be
adopted abroad, or be coming to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 226001
United States for adoption, by the
adoptive parent(s) or prospective
adoptive parent(s) of his/her natural
sibling. In addition, the child must be
otherwise qualified as a Convention
adoptee under INA Section
101(b)(1)(G)(i), except that the child is
under 18 years of age rather than under
16 years of age, as is required for
classification under INA Section
101(b)(1)(G)(i).
The IASA contains an exception at
Section 4(b) necessitating a modification
of the Department regulation contained
in 22 CFR 42.24. Under that section, an
alien who is older than 18 years of age
nonetheless may be classified under
INA Section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii) if he/she
turned 18 years of age on or after April
1, 2008 and his/her immediate relative
petition is filed not later than November
30, 2012. As currently written, the
Department’s regulations pertaining to
INA Section 101(b)(1)(G) cover
exclusively those children whose
adoptions will be governed by the
Convention. Although aliens qualified
under IASA Section 4(b) will be
emigrating from a Convention country,
the Convention only governs the
adoption of children under the age of
18. This rule is necessary to change
Department regulations to cover aliens
properly qualified under IASA Section
4(b).
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this
rule as an interim final rule, and with
an effective date less than 30 days from
the date of publication, based on the
‘‘good cause’’ exceptions set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b) and 553(d)(3). Delaying
implementation of this rule would be
contrary to the public interest, due to
the effect of recent legislation (the
International Adoption Simplification
Act). Because current Department
regulations do not contemplate the
adoption of children over the age of 18
in countries party to The Hague
Convention on Inter-Country Adoption,
the lack of procedural certainty
regarding 22 CFR 42.24 could forseeably
cause undue confusion and delay for
American citizens pursuing their rights
to adopt as provided by the IASA. The
Department will accept public
comments for 30 days after publication.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
The Department of State has reviewed
this regulation and certifies that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Department of State notes that this
regulation, as it exclusively facilitates
adoptions by U.S. citizens, will have its
greatest effect on individuals and not
small businesses. While American
Adoption Service Providers (ASPs) are
essential to intercountry adoptions in
Convention countries, this regulation
will have a negligible effect on these
ASPs, as the Department of State
anticipates that this regulation will
allow very few adoptions that would not
have already been possible in the
absence of this regulation.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532,
generally requires agencies to prepare a
statement before proposing any rule that
may result in an annual expenditure of
$100 million or more by State, local, or
tribal governments, or by the private
sector. This rule will not result in any
such expenditure, nor will it
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United
States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies in domestic
and import markets.
Executive Order 12866
The Department is exempt from
Executive Order 12866 except to the
extent that it is promulgating
regulations in conjunction with a
domestic agency that are significant
regulatory actions. The Department has
reviewed this rule to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory
philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866. Consistent with
Executive Order 12866, the Department
does not consider the rule to be an
economically significant action within
the scope of section 3(f)(1) of the
Executive Order since it is not likely to
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or to adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
§ 42.24 Adoption under the Hague
Convention on Protection of Children and
Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry
Adoption and the Intercountry Adoption Act
of 2000.
safety, or state, local or tribal
governments or communities.
Executive Order 13563
The Department of State has
considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January
18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation
is consistent with the guidance therein.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders No.
12372 and No. 13132.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirement of Section
5 of Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose information
collection requirements under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
(a) Except as described in paragraph
(n), for purposes of this section, the
definitions in 22 CFR 96.2 apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Notwithstanding paragraphs (d)
through (m) of this section, an alien
described in paragraph (n)(1) of this
section may qualify for visa status under
INA section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii) without
meeting the requirements set forth in
paragraphs (d) through (m) of this
section.
(1) Per Section 4(b) of the Intercountry
Adoption Simplification Act, Public
Law 111–287 (IASA), an alien otherwise
described in INA section
101(b)(1)(G)(iii) who attained the age of
18 on or after April 1, 2008 shall be
deemed to meet the age requirement
imposed by INA section
101(b)(1)(G)(iii)(III), provided that a
petition is filed for such child in
accordance with DHS requirements not
later than November 30, 2012.
(2) For any alien described in
paragraph (n)(1) of this section, the
‘‘competent authority’’ referred to in
INA section 101(b)(1)(G)(i)(V)(aa) is the
passport issuing authority of the country
of origin.
Dated: October 21, 2011.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–28281 Filed 10–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 42
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Immigration, Passports and Visas.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, 22 CFR part 42 is
amended as follows:
Internal Revenue Service
PART 42—[AMENDED]
[TD 9554]
26 CFR Parts 31 and 301
RIN 1545–BJ07
1. The authority citation for part 42
continues to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1182; Pub.
L. 105–277; Pub. L. 108–449; 112 Stat. 2681–
795 through 2681–801; The Convention on
Protection of Children and Co-operation in
Respect of Intercountry Adoption (done at
the Hague, May 29, 1993), S. Treaty Doc.
105–51 (1998), 1870 U.N.T.S. 167 (Reg. No.
31922 (1993)); The Intercountry Adoption
Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. 14901–14954, Pub. L.
106–279.
2. Section 42.24 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and adding
paragraph (n) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 226001
Extending Religious and Family
Member FICA and FUTA Exceptions to
Disregarded Entities
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary
regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
and temporary regulations amending 26
CFR parts 31 and 301. These regulations
extend the exceptions from taxes under
the Federal Insurance Contributions Act
(‘‘FICA’’) and the Federal
Unemployment Tax Act (‘‘FUTA’’)
under sections 3121(b)(3) (concerning
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67363
individuals who work for certain family
members), 3127 (concerning members of
religious faiths), and 3306(c)(5)
(concerning persons employed by
children and spouses and children
under 21 employed by their parents) of
the Internal Revenue Code (‘‘Code’’) to
entities that are disregarded as separate
from their owners for federal tax
purposes. The temporary regulations
also clarify the existing rule that the
owners of disregarded entities, except
for qualified subchapter S subsidiaries,
are responsible for backup withholding
and related information reporting
requirements under section 3406. The
text of the temporary regulations also
serves as the text of the proposed
regulations set forth in the notice of
proposed rulemaking on this subject in
the Proposed Rules section in this issue
of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on November 1, 2011.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability see §§ 31.3121(b)(3)–1T(e),
31.3127–1T(d), 31.3306(c)(5)–1T(e),
301.7701–2T(e)(5).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Perera (202) 622–6040 (not a toll
free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains final and
temporary regulations amending the
Employment Tax Regulations (26 CFR
part 31) and the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR
part 301) to extend the FICA and FUTA
exceptions for family members and
religious sect members to certain
entities that are disregarded as separate
from their owners for federal tax
purposes under § 301.7701–2(c). Section
301.7701–2(c)(2)(i) provides that
generally, except as otherwise provided,
a business entity that has a single owner
and is not a corporation under
§ 301.7701–2(b) is disregarded as an
entity separate from its owner. Prior to
2009, single-member entities
disregarded as separate from their
owners were generally disregarded for
employment taxes and certain other
requirements of law arising under
subtitle C. An employer is generally
defined as the person for whom an
individual performs services as an
employee. Sections 3401(d), 3121(d),
and 3306(a). Prior to 2009, the owner of
the disregarded entity was treated as the
employer for purposes of employment
tax liabilities and all other employment
tax obligations related to wages paid to
employees performing services for the
disregarded entity.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67361-67363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28281]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice 7391]
RIN 1400-AC86
Visas: Documentation of Immigrants Under the Immigration and
Nationality Act, as Amended
AGENCY: State Department.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the Department of State's regulations
relating to adoptions in countries party to The Hague Convention on the
Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry
Adoption, to include new adoption provisions from the International
Adoption Simplification Act. This legislation provides for sibling
adoption to include certain children who are under the age of 18 at the
time the petition is filed on their behalf, and also certain children
who attained the age of 18 on or after April 1, 2008 and who are the
[[Page 67362]]
beneficiaries of a petition filed on or before November 30, 2012.
DATES:
Effective Date: This rule is effective November 1, 2011.
Comment Date: The Department will accept comments from the public
up to December 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: BeaumontTW@state.gov (Subject line must read IASA
Sibling Reg.).
Mail: Chief, Legislation and Regulation Division, Visa
Services--IASA Sibling Reg., 2401 E. Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520-
30106.
``Persons with access to the Internet may view this notice
and provide comments by going to the regulations.gov Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov/index.cfm, and searching on the Public
Notice number 7391.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor W. Beaumont, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services, Department of State, 2401 E
Street, NW., Room L-603D, Washington, DC 20520-0106, who may be reached
at (202) 663-1202.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
As used in this public notice, the term ``Convention'' means The
Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect
of Intercountry Adoption; the term ``Convention country'' means a
country that is a party to the Convention and with which the Convention
is in force for the United States; and the term ``IASA'' means the
International Adoption Simplification Act, Public Law 111-287 (2010).
Why is the Department promulgating this rule?
On November 30, 2010, the President signed the IASA into law,
modifying the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as regards
adoptions from Convention countries. Among other changes, the IASA
creates a new INA Section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii) to allow U.S. citizens to
file an immediate relative petition for a child younger than 18 from a
Convention country, provided that child is the natural sibling of a
child concurrently or already adopted or being brought to the United
States for adoption under INA Sections 101(b)(1)(E)(i), (F)(i), or
(G)(i). To qualify as a child who is covered under INA Section
101(b)(1)(G)(iii), a child must be adopted abroad, or be coming to the
United States for adoption, by the adoptive parent(s) or prospective
adoptive parent(s) of his/her natural sibling. In addition, the child
must be otherwise qualified as a Convention adoptee under INA Section
101(b)(1)(G)(i), except that the child is under 18 years of age rather
than under 16 years of age, as is required for classification under INA
Section 101(b)(1)(G)(i).
The IASA contains an exception at Section 4(b) necessitating a
modification of the Department regulation contained in 22 CFR 42.24.
Under that section, an alien who is older than 18 years of age
nonetheless may be classified under INA Section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii) if
he/she turned 18 years of age on or after April 1, 2008 and his/her
immediate relative petition is filed not later than November 30, 2012.
As currently written, the Department's regulations pertaining to INA
Section 101(b)(1)(G) cover exclusively those children whose adoptions
will be governed by the Convention. Although aliens qualified under
IASA Section 4(b) will be emigrating from a Convention country, the
Convention only governs the adoption of children under the age of 18.
This rule is necessary to change Department regulations to cover aliens
properly qualified under IASA Section 4(b).
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this rule as an interim final rule,
and with an effective date less than 30 days from the date of
publication, based on the ``good cause'' exceptions set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b) and 553(d)(3). Delaying implementation of this rule would
be contrary to the public interest, due to the effect of recent
legislation (the International Adoption Simplification Act). Because
current Department regulations do not contemplate the adoption of
children over the age of 18 in countries party to The Hague Convention
on Inter-Country Adoption, the lack of procedural certainty regarding
22 CFR 42.24 could forseeably cause undue confusion and delay for
American citizens pursuing their rights to adopt as provided by the
IASA. The Department will accept public comments for 30 days after
publication.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
The Department of State has reviewed this regulation and certifies
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The Department of State notes
that this regulation, as it exclusively facilitates adoptions by U.S.
citizens, will have its greatest effect on individuals and not small
businesses. While American Adoption Service Providers (ASPs) are
essential to intercountry adoptions in Convention countries, this
regulation will have a negligible effect on these ASPs, as the
Department of State anticipates that this regulation will allow very
few adoptions that would not have already been possible in the absence
of this regulation.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law
104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may result in an
annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector. This rule will not result in any
such expenditure, nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for
purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-
121. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with foreign-based companies in domestic and import markets.
Executive Order 12866
The Department is exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the
extent that it is promulgating regulations in conjunction with a
domestic agency that are significant regulatory actions. The Department
has reviewed this rule to ensure its consistency with the regulatory
philosophy and principles set forth in Executive Order 12866.
Consistent with Executive Order 12866, the Department does not consider
the rule to be an economically significant action within the scope of
section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order since it is not likely to have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or to adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
[[Page 67363]]
safety, or state, local or tribal governments or communities.
Executive Order 13563
The Department of State has considered this rule in light of
Executive Order 13563, dated January 18, 2011, and affirms that this
regulation is consistent with the guidance therein.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372
and No. 13132.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirement of Section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose information collection requirements under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 42
Immigration, Passports and Visas.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 22 CFR part
42 is amended as follows:
PART 42--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 42 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1182; Pub. L. 105-277; Pub. L.
108-449; 112 Stat. 2681-795 through 2681-801; The Convention on
Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry
Adoption (done at the Hague, May 29, 1993), S. Treaty Doc. 105-51
(1998), 1870 U.N.T.S. 167 (Reg. No. 31922 (1993)); The Intercountry
Adoption Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. 14901-14954, Pub. L. 106-279.
0
2. Section 42.24 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and adding
paragraph (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 42.24 Adoption under the Hague Convention on Protection of
Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption and the
Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000.
(a) Except as described in paragraph (n), for purposes of this
section, the definitions in 22 CFR 96.2 apply.
* * * * *
(n) Notwithstanding paragraphs (d) through (m) of this section, an
alien described in paragraph (n)(1) of this section may qualify for
visa status under INA section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii) without meeting the
requirements set forth in paragraphs (d) through (m) of this section.
(1) Per Section 4(b) of the Intercountry Adoption Simplification
Act, Public Law 111-287 (IASA), an alien otherwise described in INA
section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii) who attained the age of 18 on or after April
1, 2008 shall be deemed to meet the age requirement imposed by INA
section 101(b)(1)(G)(iii)(III), provided that a petition is filed for
such child in accordance with DHS requirements not later than November
30, 2012.
(2) For any alien described in paragraph (n)(1) of this section,
the ``competent authority'' referred to in INA section
101(b)(1)(G)(i)(V)(aa) is the passport issuing authority of the country
of origin.
Dated: October 21, 2011.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-28281 Filed 10-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P