Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 67320-67323 [2011-28198]
Download as PDF
67320
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Planting,
(ii) Livestock feed,
(iii) Charity,
(iv) Dehydration,
(v) Canning,
(vi) Freezing,
(vii) Extraction,
(viii) Pickling, and
(ix) Disposal.
(2) Shipments of onions for the
purpose of experimentation, as
approved by the Committee, may be
made without regard to the minimum
grade, size, maturity, pack, and
inspection requirements of this section.
Assessment requirements shall be
applicable to such shipments.
(3) The minimum grade, size, and
maturity requirements set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section shall not be
applicable to shipments of pearl onions,
but the maximum size requirement in
paragraph (h) of this section and the
assessment and inspection requirements
shall be applicable to shipments of pearl
onions.
(f) Safeguards. Each handler making
shipments of onions outside the
production area for dehydration,
canning, freezing, extraction, pickling,
or experimentation pursuant to
paragraph (e) of this section shall:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 26, 2011.
Ellen King,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–28197 Filed 10–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0062; FV11–984–1
FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
California Walnut Board (Board) for the
2011–12 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0174 to $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board locally administers
the marketing order which regulates the
handling of walnuts grown in
California. Assessments upon walnut
handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 226001
the program. The marketing year began
September 1 and ends August 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: November 2,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or Kurt J.
Kimmel, Regional Manager, California
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
and Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906, or E-mail:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
984, as amended (7 CFR part 984),
regulating the handling of walnuts
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended
(7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing
order now in effect, California walnut
handlers are subject to assessments.
Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is
intended that the assessment rate as
issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable walnuts beginning on
September 1, 2011, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Board for the
2011–12 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0174 to $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts.
The California walnut marketing
order provides authority for the Board,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Board are growers and handlers
of California walnuts. They are familiar
with the Board’s needs and with the
costs for goods and services in their
local area and are thus in a position to
formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public
meeting. Thus, all directly affected
persons have an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2010–11 and subsequent
marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an
assessment rate of $0.0174 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on June 9, 2011, and
unanimously recommended 2011–12
expenditures of $7,402,450 and an
assessment rate of $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were $6,812,000.
The assessment rate of $0.0175 is
$0.0001 per pound higher than the rate
currently in effect. The quantity of
assessable walnuts for the 2011–12
marketing year is estimated at 470,000
tons (inshell), which is 35,000 tons
more than the 435,000 during the 2010–
11 marketing year. At the recommended
higher assessment rate of $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound, the Board should
collect approximately $7,402,500 in
assessment income, which would be
adequate to cover its 2011–12 budgeted
expenses of $7,402,450.
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2010–11 and 2011–12
marketing years:
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Budget expense categories
2010–11
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Employee Expenses ....................................................................................................................................
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit ..........................................................................................................
Office Expenses ...........................................................................................................................................
Program Expenses Including Research:
Controlled Purchases ...........................................................................................................................
Crop Acreage Survey ...........................................................................................................................
Crop Estimate .......................................................................................................................................
Production Research Director ..............................................................................................................
Production Research ............................................................................................................................
Sustainability Project ............................................................................................................................
Grades and Standards Research .........................................................................................................
Block Grant Research ..........................................................................................................................
Domestic Market Development ............................................................................................................
Reserve for Contingency ......................................................................................................................
The assessment rate recommended by
the Board was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of California walnuts
certified as merchantable. The 470,000
ton (inshell) estimate for merchantable
shipments is an average of the two prior
year’s shipments. The Board met on
June 9, 2011, and unanimously
approved using a two prior years’
average to formulate the 2011–12
estimate. Pursuant to § 984.51(b) of the
order, this figure is converted to a
merchantable kernelweight basis using a
factor of 0.45 (470,000 tons × 2,000
pounds per ton × 0.45), which yields
423,000,000 kernelweight pounds. At
$0.0175 per pound, the new assessment
rate should generate $7,402,500 in
assessment income and allow the Board
to cover its expenses.
Section 984.69 of the order authorizes
the Board to maintain a financial reserve
of not more than two years’ budgeted
expenses. Excess assessment funds may
be retained in the reserve or may be
used temporarily to defray expenses of
the subsequent marketing year, but if so
used, must be made available to the
handlers from whom they were
collected within five months after the
end of the marketing year.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Board will continue to meet prior to or
during each marketing year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Board meetings are
available from the Board or USDA.
Board meetings are open to the public
and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA
will evaluate Board recommendations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 226001
and other available information to
determine whether modification of the
assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking will be undertaken as
necessary. The Board’s 2011–12 budget
and those for subsequent marketing
years would be reviewed and, as
appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 4,500
growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 74
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$7,000,000.
According to the 2007 Census of
Agriculture, approximately 89 percent
of California’s walnut farms were
smaller than 100 acres.
USDA’s National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
the average yield for the 2010–11 crop
was 2.22 tons per acre. NASS also
reported the average price received for
the 2010–11 crop was $2,110 per ton.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67321
2011–12
$577,500
208,000
118,850
$693,500
218,000
117,750
20,000
95,000
105,000
88,500
1,042,000
0
125,000
0
4,400,000
32,250
20,000
95,000
115,000
88,500
1,036,000
25,000
150,000
200,00
4,635,000
8,700
A 100-acre farm with an average yield
of 2.22 tons per acre would therefore
have been expected to produce about
222 tons of walnuts during 2010–11. At
$2,110 per ton, that farm’s production
would have had an approximate value
of $468,420. Assuming that the majority
of California’s walnut farms are smaller
than 100 acres, it could be concluded
that the majority of the growers had
receipts of less than $468,420 in 2010–
11, which is well below the SBA
threshold of $750,000. Thus, the
majority of California’s walnut growers
would be considered small growers
according to SBA’s definition.
According to information supplied by
the industry, approximately two-thirds
of California’s walnut handlers shipped
merchantable walnuts valued under
$7,000,000 during the 2010–11
marketing year and would therefore be
considered small handlers according to
the SBA definition.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Board and
collected from handlers for the 2011–12
and subsequent marketing years from
$0.0174 to $0.0175 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts. The Board
unanimously recommended 2011–12
expenditures of $7,402,450 and an
assessment rate of $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The assessment rate of $0.0175
is $0.0001 higher than the 2010–11 rate.
The quantity of assessable walnuts for
the 2011–12 marketing year is estimated
at 470,000 tons inshell weight, or
423,000,000 pounds kernelweight.
Thus, the $0.0175 rate should provide
$7,402,500 in assessment income and be
adequate to meet this year’s expenses.
The increased assessment rate is
primarily due to increased budget
expenditures.
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2010–11 and 2011–12
marketing years:
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
67322
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Budget expense categories
2010–11
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Employee Expenses ....................................................................................................................................
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit ..........................................................................................................
Office Expenses ...........................................................................................................................................
Program Expenses Including Research:
Controlled Purchases ...........................................................................................................................
Crop Acreage Survey ...........................................................................................................................
Crop Estimate .......................................................................................................................................
Production Research Director ..............................................................................................................
Production Research ............................................................................................................................
Sustainability Project ............................................................................................................................
Grades and Standards Research .........................................................................................................
Block Grant Research ..........................................................................................................................
Domestic Market Development ............................................................................................................
Reserve for Contingency ......................................................................................................................
The Board reviewed and unanimously
recommended 2011–12 expenditures of
$7,402,450. Prior to arriving at this
budget, the Board considered alternative
expenditure levels but ultimately
decided that the recommended levels
were reasonable to properly administer
the order. The assessment rate of
$0.0175 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses of
$7,402,450 by expected shipments of
California walnuts certified as
merchantable. Merchantable shipments
for the year are estimated at 423,000,000
pounds, which should provide
$7,402,500 in assessment income and
allow the Board to cover its expenses.
Unexpended funds may be retained in
a financial reserve, provided that funds
in the financial reserve do not exceed
approximately two years’ budgeted
expenses. If not retained in a financial
reserve, unexpended funds may be used
temporarily to defray expenses of the
subsequent marketing year, but must be
made available to the handlers from
whom collected within 5 months after
the end of the year, according to
§ 984.69 of the order.
According to NASS, the season
average grower prices for the years 2009
and 2010 were $1,710 and $2,110 per
ton, respectively. These prices provide a
range within which the 2011–12 season
average price could fall. Dividing these
average grower prices by 2,000 pounds
per ton provides an inshell price per
pound range of $0.86 to $1.06. Dividing
these inshell prices per pound by the
0.45 conversion factor (inshell to
kernelweight) established in the order
yields a 2011–12 price range estimate of
$1.91 to $2.36 per kernelweight pound
of assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower
revenue represented by the assessment
rate, the assessment rate of $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound is divided by the
low and high estimates of the price
range. The estimated assessment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 226001
revenue for the 2011–12 marketing year
as a percentage of total grower revenue
will thus likely range between .74 and
.92 percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to growers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the marketing order. In
addition, the Board’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California walnut industry, and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Board deliberations on all issues. Like
all Board meetings, the June 9, 2011,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 (Walnuts
Grown in California). No changes in
those requirements as a result of this
action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This final rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California
walnut handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2011–12
$577,500
208,000
118,850
$693,500
218,000
117,750
20,000
95,000
105,000
88,500
1,042,000
0
125,000
0
4,400,000
32,250
20,000
95,000
115,000
88,500
1,036,000
25,000
150,000
200,000
4,635,000
8,700
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on August 16, 2011 (75 FR
50703). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to
all walnut handlers. Finally, the
proposal was made available through
the Internet by USDA and the Office of
the Federal Register. A 30-day comment
period ending on September 15, 2011,
was provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrderSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
for not postponing the effective date of
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because the
2011–12 marketing year began on
September 1, 2011. Further, the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each marketing year
apply to all assessable walnuts handled
during the year; the Board needs to have
sufficient funds to meet its expenses
which are incurred on a continuous
basis; and handlers are aware of this
rule which was unanimously
recommended at a public meeting. Also,
a 30-day comment period was provided
for in the proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as
follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 984.347
Assessment rate.
On and after September 1, 2011, an
assessment rate of $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound is established for
California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: October 26, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–28198 Filed 10–31–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 243
[Regulation QQ; Docket No. R–1414]
RIN 7100–AD73
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 381
RIN 3064 AD 77
Resolution Plans Required
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board) and
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(Corporation).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Board and the
Corporation (together the ‘‘Agencies’’)
are adopting this final rule to implement
the requirement in a section of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the ‘‘DoddFrank Act’’) regarding resolution plans.
The Dodd-Frank Act section requires
each nonbank financial company
designated by the Financial Stability
Oversight Council (the ‘‘Council’’) for
enhanced supervision by the Board and
each bank holding company with assets
of $50 billion or more to report
periodically to the Board, the
Corporation, and the Council the plan of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:41 Oct 31, 2011
Jkt 226001
such company for rapid and orderly
resolution in the event of material
financial distress or failure.
DATES: The rule is effective November
30, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Board: Barbara J. Bouchard, Senior
Associate Director, (202) 452–3072,
Michael D. Solomon, Associate Director,
(202) 452–3502, or Avery I. Belka,
Counsel, (202) 736–5691, Division of
Banking Regulation and Supervision; or
Ann E. Misback, Associate General
Counsel, (202) 452–3788, Dominic A.
Labitzky, Senior Attorney, (202) 452–
3428, or Bao Nguyen, Attorney, (202)
736–5599, Legal Division; Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th and C Streets, NW.,
Washington, DC 20551. Users of
Telecommunication Device for Deaf
(TDD) only, call (202) 263–4869.
Corporation: Joseph Fellerman, Senior
Program Analyst, (202) 898–6591, Office
of Complex Financial Institutions,
Richard T. Aboussie, Associate General
Counsel, (703) 562–2452, David N. Wall,
Assistant General Counsel, (703) 562–
2440, Mark A. Thompson, Counsel,
(703) 562–2529, or Mark G. Flanigan,
Counsel, (202) 898–7426, Legal
Division.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
To promote financial stability, section
165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires
each nonbank financial company
supervised by the Board and each bank
holding company with total
consolidated assets of $50 billion or
more (each a ‘‘covered company’’) to
periodically submit to the Board, the
Corporation, and the Council a plan for
such company’s rapid and orderly
resolution in the event of material
financial distress or failure. That section
also requires each covered company to
report on the nature and extent of credit
exposures of such covered company to
significant bank holding companies and
significant nonbank financial companies
and the nature and extent of credit
exposures of significant bank holding
companies and significant nonbank
financial companies to such covered
company.1 This final rule implements
the resolution plan requirement set forth
in section 165(d)(1) of the Dodd-Frank
Act.
Plans filed under section 165(d)(1)
will assist covered companies and
regulators in conducting advance
resolution planning for a covered
company. As demonstrated by the
Corporation’s experience in failed bank
1 See
PO 00000
generally 12 U.S.C. 5365(d).
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67323
resolutions, as well as the Board’s and
the Corporation’s experience in the
recent crisis, advance planning
improves the efficient resolution of a
covered company. Advance planning
has long been a component of resiliency
and recovery planning by financial
companies. The resolution plan
required of covered companies under
this final rule will support the
Corporation’s planning for the exercise
of its resolution authority under the
Dodd-Frank Act and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (‘‘FDI Act’’) by providing
the Corporation with an understanding
of the covered companies’ structure and
complexity as well as their resolution
strategies and processes. The resolution
plan required of covered companies
under this final rule will also assist the
Board in its supervisory efforts to ensure
that covered companies operate in a
manner that is both safe and sound and
that does not pose risks to financial
stability generally. In addition, these
plans will enhance the Agencies’
understanding of the U.S. operations of
foreign banks and improve efforts to
develop a comprehensive and
coordinated resolution strategy for a
cross-border firm.
The final rule requires each covered
company to produce a resolution plan,
or ‘‘living will,’’ that includes
information regarding the manner and
extent to which any insured depository
institution affiliated with the company
is adequately protected from risks
arising from the activities of nonbank
subsidiaries of the company; detailed
descriptions of the ownership structure,
assets, liabilities, and contractual
obligations of the company;
identification of the cross-guarantees
tied to different securities; identification
of major counterparties; a process for
determining to whom the collateral of
the company is pledged; and other
information that the Board and the
Corporation jointly require by rule or
order.2 The final rule requires a strategic
analysis by the covered company of how
it can be resolved under Title 11 of the
U.S. Code (the ‘‘Bankruptcy Code’’) in a
way that would not pose systemic risk
to the financial system. In doing so, the
company must map its core business
lines and critical operations to material
legal entities and provide integrated
analyses of its corporate structure; credit
and other exposures; funding, capital,
and cash flows; the domestic and
foreign jurisdictions in which it
operates; and its supporting information
systems for core business lines and
critical operations.
2 See
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
12 U.S.C. 5365(d)(1).
01NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67320-67323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28198]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0062; FV11-984-1 FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
California Walnut Board (Board) for the 2011-12 and subsequent
marketing years from $0.0174 to $0.0175 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts. The Board locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of walnuts grown in California.
Assessments upon walnut handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The marketing year
began September 1 and ends August 31. The assessment rate will remain
in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: November 2, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part 984), regulating the handling of
walnuts grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect,
California walnut handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended
that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable walnuts beginning on September 1, 2011, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the Board
for the 2011-12 and subsequent marketing years from $0.0174 to $0.0175
per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts.
The California walnut marketing order provides authority for the
Board, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Board are growers and handlers of
California walnuts. They are familiar with the Board's needs and with
the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2010-11 and subsequent marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $0.0174 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts that would continue in effect
from year to year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on June 9, 2011, and unanimously recommended 2011-12
expenditures of $7,402,450 and an assessment rate of $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. In comparison, last year's
budgeted expenditures were $6,812,000. The assessment rate of $0.0175
is $0.0001 per pound higher than the rate currently in effect. The
quantity of assessable walnuts for the 2011-12 marketing year is
estimated at 470,000 tons (inshell), which is 35,000 tons more than the
435,000 during the 2010-11 marketing year. At the recommended higher
assessment rate of $0.0175 per kernelweight pound, the Board should
collect approximately $7,402,500 in assessment income, which would be
adequate to cover its 2011-12 budgeted expenses of $7,402,450.
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 marketing years:
[[Page 67321]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2010-11 2011-12
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee Expenses................. $577,500 $693,500
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit 208,000 218,000
Office Expenses................... 118,850 117,750
Program Expenses Including
Research:
Controlled Purchases.......... 20,000 20,000
Crop Acreage Survey........... 95,000 95,000
Crop Estimate................. 105,000 115,000
Production Research Director.. 88,500 88,500
Production Research........... 1,042,000 1,036,000
Sustainability Project........ 0 25,000
Grades and Standards Research. 125,000 150,000
Block Grant Research.......... 0 200,00
Domestic Market Development... 4,400,000 4,635,000
Reserve for Contingency....... 32,250 8,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable. The 470,000 ton (inshell) estimate
for merchantable shipments is an average of the two prior year's
shipments. The Board met on June 9, 2011, and unanimously approved
using a two prior years' average to formulate the 2011-12 estimate.
Pursuant to Sec. 984.51(b) of the order, this figure is converted to a
merchantable kernelweight basis using a factor of 0.45 (470,000 tons x
2,000 pounds per ton x 0.45), which yields 423,000,000 kernelweight
pounds. At $0.0175 per pound, the new assessment rate should generate
$7,402,500 in assessment income and allow the Board to cover its
expenses.
Section 984.69 of the order authorizes the Board to maintain a
financial reserve of not more than two years' budgeted expenses. Excess
assessment funds may be retained in the reserve or may be used
temporarily to defray expenses of the subsequent marketing year, but if
so used, must be made available to the handlers from whom they were
collected within five months after the end of the marketing year.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Board or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Board will continue to meet prior to or during each
marketing year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Board meetings are available from the Board or USDA. Board
meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Board recommendations
and other available information to determine whether modification of
the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will be undertaken as
necessary. The Board's 2011-12 budget and those for subsequent
marketing years would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by
USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 4,500 growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 74 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those
having annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural
service firms are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$7,000,000.
According to the 2007 Census of Agriculture, approximately 89
percent of California's walnut farms were smaller than 100 acres.
USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
the average yield for the 2010-11 crop was 2.22 tons per acre. NASS
also reported the average price received for the 2010-11 crop was
$2,110 per ton.
A 100-acre farm with an average yield of 2.22 tons per acre would
therefore have been expected to produce about 222 tons of walnuts
during 2010-11. At $2,110 per ton, that farm's production would have
had an approximate value of $468,420. Assuming that the majority of
California's walnut farms are smaller than 100 acres, it could be
concluded that the majority of the growers had receipts of less than
$468,420 in 2010-11, which is well below the SBA threshold of $750,000.
Thus, the majority of California's walnut growers would be considered
small growers according to SBA's definition.
According to information supplied by the industry, approximately
two-thirds of California's walnut handlers shipped merchantable walnuts
valued under $7,000,000 during the 2010-11 marketing year and would
therefore be considered small handlers according to the SBA definition.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the Board
and collected from handlers for the 2011-12 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0174 to $0.0175 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board unanimously recommended 2011-12 expenditures of
$7,402,450 and an assessment rate of $0.0175 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts. The assessment rate of $0.0175 is $0.0001 higher
than the 2010-11 rate. The quantity of assessable walnuts for the 2011-
12 marketing year is estimated at 470,000 tons inshell weight, or
423,000,000 pounds kernelweight. Thus, the $0.0175 rate should provide
$7,402,500 in assessment income and be adequate to meet this year's
expenses. The increased assessment rate is primarily due to increased
budget expenditures.
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 marketing years:
[[Page 67322]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2010-11 2011-12
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee Expenses................. $577,500 $693,500
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit 208,000 218,000
Office Expenses................... 118,850 117,750
Program Expenses Including
Research:
Controlled Purchases.......... 20,000 20,000
Crop Acreage Survey........... 95,000 95,000
Crop Estimate................. 105,000 115,000
Production Research Director.. 88,500 88,500
Production Research........... 1,042,000 1,036,000
Sustainability Project........ 0 25,000
Grades and Standards Research. 125,000 150,000
Block Grant Research.......... 0 200,000
Domestic Market Development... 4,400,000 4,635,000
Reserve for Contingency....... 32,250 8,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board reviewed and unanimously recommended 2011-12 expenditures
of $7,402,450. Prior to arriving at this budget, the Board considered
alternative expenditure levels but ultimately decided that the
recommended levels were reasonable to properly administer the order.
The assessment rate of $0.0175 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts was derived by dividing anticipated expenses of $7,402,450 by
expected shipments of California walnuts certified as merchantable.
Merchantable shipments for the year are estimated at 423,000,000
pounds, which should provide $7,402,500 in assessment income and allow
the Board to cover its expenses. Unexpended funds may be retained in a
financial reserve, provided that funds in the financial reserve do not
exceed approximately two years' budgeted expenses. If not retained in a
financial reserve, unexpended funds may be used temporarily to defray
expenses of the subsequent marketing year, but must be made available
to the handlers from whom collected within 5 months after the end of
the year, according to Sec. 984.69 of the order.
According to NASS, the season average grower prices for the years
2009 and 2010 were $1,710 and $2,110 per ton, respectively. These
prices provide a range within which the 2011-12 season average price
could fall. Dividing these average grower prices by 2,000 pounds per
ton provides an inshell price per pound range of $0.86 to $1.06.
Dividing these inshell prices per pound by the 0.45 conversion factor
(inshell to kernelweight) established in the order yields a 2011-12
price range estimate of $1.91 to $2.36 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower revenue represented by the
assessment rate, the assessment rate of $0.0175 per kernelweight pound
is divided by the low and high estimates of the price range. The
estimated assessment revenue for the 2011-12 marketing year as a
percentage of total grower revenue will thus likely range between .74
and .92 percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to growers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing order.
In addition, the Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
California walnut industry, and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the June 9, 2011, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Walnuts Grown in California). No changes in
those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This final rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California walnut handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on August 16, 2011 (75 FR 50703). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all walnut handlers. Finally,
the proposal was made available through the Internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period ending on
September 15, 2011, was provided for interested persons to respond to
the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrderSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about
the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because the 2011-12
marketing year began on September 1, 2011. Further, the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for each marketing year apply to
all assessable walnuts handled during the year; the Board needs to have
sufficient funds to meet its expenses which are incurred on a
continuous basis; and handlers are aware of this rule which was
unanimously recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 30-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed rule.
[[Page 67323]]
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is
amended as follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 984.347 Assessment rate.
On and after September 1, 2011, an assessment rate of $0.0175 per
kernelweight pound is established for California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: October 26, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-28198 Filed 10-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P