Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the National Mall Plan, National Mall and Memorial Parks, Washington, DC, 66960-66961 [2011-27891]
Download as PDF
66960
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2011 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
for solar projects supported by DOE in
any location, not just BLM-administered
lands in the six-state study area.
The DOE will consider this guidance,
including recommended environmental
practices and mitigation measures, in its
investment and deployment strategies
and decision-making process. This
guidance, based on the analyses in the
Draft Solar Programmatic EIS and other
information, would provide DOE with a
tool for making more informed,
environmentally sound decisions at the
outset, help to streamline future
environmental analysis and
documentation for DOE-supported solar
projects, and support the DOE’s efforts
to comprehensively (1) Determine
where to make technology and resource
investments to minimize the potential
environmental impacts of solar
technologies for DOE-supported solar
projects, and (2) establish
environmental mitigation
recommendations for proponents of
DOE solar projects to consider in project
plans.
Through the Solar Programmatic EIS,
the DOE is evaluating two alternatives:
an action alternative and a no action
alternative. Under the action alternative,
the DOE would develop and adopt
programmatic environmental guidance
that would be used by DOE to further
integrate environmental considerations
into its analysis and selection of
proposed solar projects. In the
Supplement, DOE presents for public
comment proposed guidance intended
to amend its existing case-by-case
approach, thus facilitating the
advancement of solar energy
development. Under the no action
alternative, the DOE would continue its
existing case-by-case process for
addressing environmental concerns for
solar projects supported by DOE. It
would not develop programmatic
environmental guidance with
recommended environmental best
management practices and mitigation
measures that could be applied to DOEsupported solar projects.
Other Agency Involvement
Cooperating Federal agencies on the
Solar Programmatic EIS include the
Department of Defense; the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service; the National Park
Service; the Bureau of Reclamation; the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 9; and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, South Pacific Division. Other
cooperating agencies on the Solar PEIS
include the Arizona Game and Fish
Department; the California Energy
Commission and Public Utilities
Commission; the Nevada Department of
Wildlife, the N–4 Grazing Board, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Oct 27, 2011
Jkt 226001
the Southern Nevada Water Authority;
the Utah Public Lands Policy
Coordination Office; Clark, Esmeralda,
Eureka, Lincoln, and Nye Counties,
Nevada; Saguache County, Colorado;
and Dona Ana County, New Mexico.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Michael D. Nedd,
Assistant Director, Minerals and Realty
Management, Bureau of Land Management.
Henry Kelly,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Department of Energy.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 1506.10, 43
CFR 1610.2, and 10 CFR 1021.313.
[FR Doc. 2011–27874 Filed 10–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NCR–NAMA–0411–7123; 3401–007–
SZM]
Record of Decision on the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the National Mall Plan, National Mall
and Memorial Parks, Washington, DC
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability, Record of
Decision on the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the National Mall
Plan, National Mall and Memorial
Parks, Washington, DC.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park
Service announces the availability of the
Record of Decision for the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the
National Mall Plan, National Mall and
Memorial Parks (Final EIS/Plan).
ADDRESSES: The Record of Decision,
Final EIS/Plan, and other information
are available for public review in the
Office of the Superintendent, National
Mall and Memorial Parks, 900 Ohio
Drive SW., Washington, DC 20024–
2000. Copies are also posted online at
https://www.nps.gov/nationalmallplan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent, National Mall and
Memorial Parks, 900 Ohio Drive SW.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Washington, DC 20024–2000, or by
telephone at (202) 245–4690.
The
Record of Decision was signed at the
Thomas Jefferson Memorial in
Washington, DC on November 9, 2010,
by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar;
Assistant Secretary for Fish, Wildlife
and Parks Tom Strickland, and National
Park Service Director Jon Jarvis. The
Record of Decision was also signed by
National Capital Regional Director
Peggy O’Dell and Acting National Mall
and Memorial Parks Superintendent
Maria Burks. A Floodplain Statement of
Findings was signed on September 30,
2010, and a Programmatic Agreement
with the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, the District of Columbia
State Historic Preservation Office, and
others was signed on November 8, 2010.
All of these documents are posted
online at https://www.nps.gov/
nationalmallplan.
Other related material is also available
at https://www.nps.gov/
nationalmallplan—‘‘A National Mall
Plan: Summary,’’ ‘‘The National Mall
Plan: 2010 General Implementation
Priorities’’ list and related map, ‘‘The
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
and National Mall Plan,’’ newsletters,
studies, public comment reports, maps,
historic reports and background
materials, and a number of related
papers.
The National Mall in Washington, DC
is managed by the National Park Service
as part of the National Park System.
Following direction by Congress, in
November 2006, the National Park
Service announced an intensive
planning effort to refurbish the National
Mall so that (1) Its treasured memorials
and historic landscapes could be
preserved, (2) very high levels of use
could be sustained, and (3) the needs of
visitors could be met. This effort
recognized that the National Mall was
not designed for the types and levels of
use it currently receives—nearly 25
million visits annually, including
demonstrations, national celebrations,
and permitted events. This high level of
visitation has resulted in adverse
impacts on the cultural and natural
resources of the National Mall.
Adequate facilities are lacking for large
gatherings, events, exhibitions, and
celebrations; for tourism and general
visitation; for group visitation; for
visitors with disabilities; and for
recreational opportunities. This has had
adverse impacts on visitor experiences
and park operations.
The scope of the Final Plan/EIS
encompasses three specific locations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2011 / Notices
collectively referred to as the National
Mall, in Washington, DC.
• The Mall, which extends from the
grounds of the United States Capitol to
the Washington Monument and
includes Union Square.
• The Washington Monument and its
grounds.
• West Potomac Park, including the
Lincoln Memorial, the World War II
Memorial, the Vietnam Veterans
Memorial, the Franklin Delano
Roosevelt Memorial, the Tidal Basin,
and the Thomas Jefferson Memorial.
The Record of Decision identifies the
preferred alternative, as described in the
Final EIS/Plan, as the selected action for
implementation. The preferred
alternative articulates a vision to protect
and refurbish the National Mall so that
it can better fulfill its function as our
American symbol and civic space for
our democracy, and so that high levels
of use can be sustained, resources
protected, and visitor needs met.
The National Park Service’s proposed
course of action is to reinforce the
overall identity of the National Mall and
to establish a sense of place through
enduring and compatible high-quality
design, as well as through the highest
standards of facility maintenance. The
National Mall will be respectfully
rehabilitated and refurbished, with
improvements made to the pedestrian
environment, so that very high levels of
use can be accommodated and so that
the needs of all visitors can be met in
an attractive, high-quality, energyefficient, and sustainable manner. As
the preeminent civic stage for our
country, First Amendment
demonstrations, commemorations,
national ceremonies and celebrations
will be better accommodated.
Memorials and landscapes will be
protected and the large areas of open
space that are defining features of the
designed historic landscape will be
better maintained.
The landscape will evolve to
accommodate contemporary uses while
respecting the planned historic
character and visions of the L’Enfant
and McMillan plans. The National Mall
will be emphasized as a year-round
destination where the beauty and
variety of every season will enhance
visitor experiences. Diverse
opportunities will be available for
visitors and will include educational,
cultural, and musical programs, as well
as active and passive recreational
activities. The National Park Service
will continue to manage the National
Mall pursuant to the applicable laws,
regulations, and policies for these
natural, cultural, and historic resources.
Taken as a whole, the selected action is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Oct 27, 2011
Jkt 226001
also the environmentally preferred
alternative because it best meets all six
goals of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). It was developed by
combining the advantages of the other
alternatives, and resource conditions
will be greatly improved to help achieve
the paramount goal of enriching and
providing a quality American
experience for all. The selected action
will address high levels of use and
improve conditions.
The decision is based on:
• Considerations of public use;
• Civic, ceremonial and
commemorative functions;
• Park operational efficiency;
• Analyses of environmental impacts
on cultural and natural resources;
• Demonstrations;
• Special events;
• National celebrations;
• Access and circulation;
• Visitor experience;
• Socioeconomic environment; and
• Park operations.
Planning started with a National Park
Service-hosted national symposium on
future use and management of the
National Mall and featured nationallyrecognized experts in architecture,
freedom of speech, First Amendment
rights, landscape architecture, history,
law enforcement, planning, and
government. Substantial public
involvement was integral to the process
for developing the plan and resulted in
more than 30,000 public comments, as
well as close collaboration with 21
governmental agencies and 30
organizations with an interest in the
National Mall and/or historic
preservation.
The Final EIS/Plan will serve as the
foundation for subsequent
implementation plans. Among decisions
made in the Final EIS/Plan, the
identification of locations capable of
better accommodating use within a
designed historic landscape is
significant.
The National Park Service
investigated means to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts as a result of the
plan and its projects. The National Park
Service had studies, and assessments
prepared at the beginning of the
planning process, both for public
information and as background for the
National Park Service planning team.
The National Park Service also worked
with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and consultants to learn about
best practices for solid waste and
recycling programs. The results of this
extensive background analysis were
incorporated into the alternatives,
including the preferred alternative. The
National Park Service will continue to
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66961
take all practical measures to avoid
environmental harm and harm to related
cultural and historic resources through
compliance with statutes such as the
NEPA and the National Historic
Preservation Act, which provide for
analyses and consultation. The National
Park Service will continue to work with
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on
projects related to the Potomac River,
the Tidal Basin, and the Potomac Park
levee, and as appropriate with other
organizations, agencies, and
commissions including the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, the
District of Columbia State Historic
Preservation Office, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the U.S. Commission
of Fine Arts, and the National Capital
Planning Commission.
The Record of Decision contains:
• A summary of the selected
alternative;
• Mitigation measures developed to
minimize environmental harm;
• The four other alternatives
considered (including a no-action
alternative);
• The basis for the decision in terms
of planning objectives and the criteria
used to develop the preferred
alternative;
• The finding of no impairment of
park resources and values;
• The environmentally preferred
alternative; and
• The public and agency
involvement.
Dated: September 28, 2010.
Stephen E. Whitesell,
Regional Director, National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2011–27891 Filed 10–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–1011–8676; 2200–
3200–665]
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
Nominations for the following
properties being considered for listing
or related actions in the National
Register were received by the National
Park Service before October 8, 2011.
Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part
60, written comments are being
accepted concerning the significance of
the nominated properties under the
National Register criteria for evaluation.
Comments may be forwarded by United
States Postal Service, to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66960-66961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27891]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-NCR-NAMA-0411-7123; 3401-007-SZM]
Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the National Mall Plan, National Mall and Memorial Parks,
Washington, DC
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability, Record of Decision on the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the National Mall Plan, National
Mall and Memorial Parks, Washington, DC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability
of the Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the National Mall Plan, National Mall and Memorial Parks (Final
EIS/Plan).
ADDRESSES: The Record of Decision, Final EIS/Plan, and other
information are available for public review in the Office of the
Superintendent, National Mall and Memorial Parks, 900 Ohio Drive SW.,
Washington, DC 20024-2000. Copies are also posted online at https://www.nps.gov/nationalmallplan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, National Mall and
Memorial Parks, 900 Ohio Drive SW., Washington, DC 20024-2000, or by
telephone at (202) 245-4690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Record of Decision was signed at the
Thomas Jefferson Memorial in Washington, DC on November 9, 2010, by
Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar; Assistant Secretary for Fish,
Wildlife and Parks Tom Strickland, and National Park Service Director
Jon Jarvis. The Record of Decision was also signed by National Capital
Regional Director Peggy O'Dell and Acting National Mall and Memorial
Parks Superintendent Maria Burks. A Floodplain Statement of Findings
was signed on September 30, 2010, and a Programmatic Agreement with the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the District of Columbia
State Historic Preservation Office, and others was signed on November
8, 2010. All of these documents are posted online at https://www.nps.gov/nationalmallplan.
Other related material is also available at https://www.nps.gov/nationalmallplan--``A National Mall Plan: Summary,'' ``The National
Mall Plan: 2010 General Implementation Priorities'' list and related
map, ``The Draft Environmental Impact Statement and National Mall
Plan,'' newsletters, studies, public comment reports, maps, historic
reports and background materials, and a number of related papers.
The National Mall in Washington, DC is managed by the National Park
Service as part of the National Park System. Following direction by
Congress, in November 2006, the National Park Service announced an
intensive planning effort to refurbish the National Mall so that (1)
Its treasured memorials and historic landscapes could be preserved, (2)
very high levels of use could be sustained, and (3) the needs of
visitors could be met. This effort recognized that the National Mall
was not designed for the types and levels of use it currently
receives--nearly 25 million visits annually, including demonstrations,
national celebrations, and permitted events. This high level of
visitation has resulted in adverse impacts on the cultural and natural
resources of the National Mall. Adequate facilities are lacking for
large gatherings, events, exhibitions, and celebrations; for tourism
and general visitation; for group visitation; for visitors with
disabilities; and for recreational opportunities. This has had adverse
impacts on visitor experiences and park operations.
The scope of the Final Plan/EIS encompasses three specific
locations
[[Page 66961]]
collectively referred to as the National Mall, in Washington, DC.
The Mall, which extends from the grounds of the United
States Capitol to the Washington Monument and includes Union Square.
The Washington Monument and its grounds.
West Potomac Park, including the Lincoln Memorial, the
World War II Memorial, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, the Franklin
Delano Roosevelt Memorial, the Tidal Basin, and the Thomas Jefferson
Memorial.
The Record of Decision identifies the preferred alternative, as
described in the Final EIS/Plan, as the selected action for
implementation. The preferred alternative articulates a vision to
protect and refurbish the National Mall so that it can better fulfill
its function as our American symbol and civic space for our democracy,
and so that high levels of use can be sustained, resources protected,
and visitor needs met.
The National Park Service's proposed course of action is to
reinforce the overall identity of the National Mall and to establish a
sense of place through enduring and compatible high-quality design, as
well as through the highest standards of facility maintenance. The
National Mall will be respectfully rehabilitated and refurbished, with
improvements made to the pedestrian environment, so that very high
levels of use can be accommodated and so that the needs of all visitors
can be met in an attractive, high-quality, energy-efficient, and
sustainable manner. As the preeminent civic stage for our country,
First Amendment demonstrations, commemorations, national ceremonies and
celebrations will be better accommodated. Memorials and landscapes will
be protected and the large areas of open space that are defining
features of the designed historic landscape will be better maintained.
The landscape will evolve to accommodate contemporary uses while
respecting the planned historic character and visions of the L'Enfant
and McMillan plans. The National Mall will be emphasized as a year-
round destination where the beauty and variety of every season will
enhance visitor experiences. Diverse opportunities will be available
for visitors and will include educational, cultural, and musical
programs, as well as active and passive recreational activities. The
National Park Service will continue to manage the National Mall
pursuant to the applicable laws, regulations, and policies for these
natural, cultural, and historic resources. Taken as a whole, the
selected action is also the environmentally preferred alternative
because it best meets all six goals of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). It was developed by combining the advantages of the
other alternatives, and resource conditions will be greatly improved to
help achieve the paramount goal of enriching and providing a quality
American experience for all. The selected action will address high
levels of use and improve conditions.
The decision is based on:
Considerations of public use;
Civic, ceremonial and commemorative functions;
Park operational efficiency;
Analyses of environmental impacts on cultural and natural
resources;
Demonstrations;
Special events;
National celebrations;
Access and circulation;
Visitor experience;
Socioeconomic environment; and
Park operations.
Planning started with a National Park Service-hosted national
symposium on future use and management of the National Mall and
featured nationally-recognized experts in architecture, freedom of
speech, First Amendment rights, landscape architecture, history, law
enforcement, planning, and government. Substantial public involvement
was integral to the process for developing the plan and resulted in
more than 30,000 public comments, as well as close collaboration with
21 governmental agencies and 30 organizations with an interest in the
National Mall and/or historic preservation.
The Final EIS/Plan will serve as the foundation for subsequent
implementation plans. Among decisions made in the Final EIS/Plan, the
identification of locations capable of better accommodating use within
a designed historic landscape is significant.
The National Park Service investigated means to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts as a result of the plan and its projects. The
National Park Service had studies, and assessments prepared at the
beginning of the planning process, both for public information and as
background for the National Park Service planning team. The National
Park Service also worked with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and consultants to learn about best practices for solid waste and
recycling programs. The results of this extensive background analysis
were incorporated into the alternatives, including the preferred
alternative. The National Park Service will continue to take all
practical measures to avoid environmental harm and harm to related
cultural and historic resources through compliance with statutes such
as the NEPA and the National Historic Preservation Act, which provide
for analyses and consultation. The National Park Service will continue
to work with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on projects related to
the Potomac River, the Tidal Basin, and the Potomac Park levee, and as
appropriate with other organizations, agencies, and commissions
including the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the District
of Columbia State Historic Preservation Office, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, and the National
Capital Planning Commission.
The Record of Decision contains:
A summary of the selected alternative;
Mitigation measures developed to minimize environmental
harm;
The four other alternatives considered (including a no-
action alternative);
The basis for the decision in terms of planning objectives
and the criteria used to develop the preferred alternative;
The finding of no impairment of park resources and values;
The environmentally preferred alternative; and
The public and agency involvement.
Dated: September 28, 2010.
Stephen E. Whitesell,
Regional Director, National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-27891 Filed 10-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-39-P