Partner's Distributive Share, 66012-66013 [2011-27575]
Download as PDF
66012
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration), at
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice
of proposed rulemaking by crossreference to temporary regulations and a
notice of public hearing that appeared
in the Federal Register on Friday, July
22, 2011 (76 FR 43957), announced that
a public hearing was scheduled for
October 27, 2011, beginning at 10 a.m.
in the auditorium of the Internal
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
subject of the public hearing is under
section 1001 of the Internal Revenue
Code.
The public comment period for a
notice of proposed rulemaking by crossreference to temporary regulations
expired on October 20, 2011. Outlines of
topics to be discussed at the hearing
were due on October 20, 2011. A notice
of propose rulemaking by crossreference to temporary regulations and
notice of public hearing instructed those
interested in testifying at the public
hearing to submit an outline of the
topics to be addressed. As of Friday,
October 21, 2011, no one has requested
to speak. Therefore, the public hearing
scheduled for October 27, 2011 is
cancelled.
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel, Procedure and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–27573 Filed 10–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–109564–10]
RIN 1545–BJ37
Partner’s Distributive Share
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations removing § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iii)(e) (the de minimis partner
rule) because the rule may have resulted
in unintended tax consequences. The
proposed regulations affect partnerships
and their partners.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by January 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–109564–10), Room
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:38 Oct 24, 2011
Jkt 226001
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–109564–
10), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC; or sent electronically,
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–
109564–10).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Michala Irons, at (202) 622–3050;
concerning submission of comments, or
requests for a public hearing, Richard
Hurst, at (202) 622–2949 (TDD
Telephone) (not toll free numbers) and
his e-mail address is
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Subchapter K is intended to permit
taxpayers to conduct joint business
activities through a flexible economic
arrangement without incurring an
entity-level tax. To achieve this goal of
a flexible economic arrangement,
partners are generally permitted to
decide among themselves how a
partnership’s items will be allocated.
Section 704(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code provides that a partner’s
distributive share of income, gain, loss,
deduction, or credit shall, except as
otherwise provided, be determined by
the partnership agreement.
Section 704(b) places a significant
limitation on the general flexibility of
section 704(a). Specifically, section
704(b) provides that a partner’s
distributive share of income, gain, loss,
deduction, or credit (or item thereof)
shall be determined in accordance with
the partner’s interest in the partnership
(determined by taking into account all
facts and circumstances) if the
allocation to a partner under the
partnership agreement of income, gain,
loss, deduction, or credit (or item
thereof) does not have substantial
economic effect. Thus, the statute
provides that partnership allocations
either must have substantial economic
effect or must be in accordance with the
partners’ interests in the partnership.
Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(i) provides that
the determination of whether an
allocation of income, gain, loss, or
deduction to a partner has substantial
economic effect involves a two-part
analysis that is made as of the end of the
partnership taxable year to which the
allocation relates. First, the allocation
must have economic effect within the
meaning of § 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii). Second,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the economic effect of the allocation
must be substantial within the meaning
of § 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii).
For an allocation to have economic
effect, it must be consistent with the
underlying economic arrangement of the
partners. This means that, in the event
that there is an economic benefit or
burden that corresponds to the
allocation, the partner to whom the
allocation is made must receive such
economic benefit or bear such economic
burden. See § 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii).
Generally, an allocation of income, gain,
loss, or deduction (or item thereof) to a
partner will have economic effect if, and
only if, throughout the full term of the
partnership, the partnership agreement
provides: (1) for the determination and
maintenance of the partners’ capital
accounts in accordance with § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iv); (2) for liquidating
distributions to the partners to be made
in accordance with the positive capital
account balances of the partners; and (3)
for each partner to be unconditionally
obligated to restore the deficit balance
in the partner’s capital account
following the liquidation of the
partner’s partnership interest. In lieu of
satisfying the third criterion, the
partnership may satisfy the qualified
income offset rules set forth in § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(ii)(d).
Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(a) provides
as a general rule that the economic
effect of an allocation (or allocations) is
substantial if there is a reasonable
possibility that the allocation (or
allocations) will affect substantially the
dollar amounts to be received by the
partners from the partnership,
independent of tax consequences. This
section further provides that, even if the
allocation affects substantially the dollar
amounts, the economic effect of the
allocation (or allocations) is not
substantial if, at the time the allocation
(or allocations) becomes part of the
partnership agreement: (1) The after-tax
economic consequences of at least one
partner may, in present value terms, be
enhanced compared to such
consequences if the allocation (or
allocations) were not contained in the
partnership agreement, and (2) there is
a strong likelihood that the after-tax
economic consequences of no partner
will, in present value terms, be
substantially diminished compared to
such consequences if the allocation (or
allocations) were not contained in the
partnership agreement.
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Explanation of Provisions
Removal of De Minimis Partner Rule in
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(e)
The de minimis partner rule in
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(e) (TD 9398, 73 FR
28699–01) was promulgated on May 19,
2008, as part of final regulations with
respect to partners that are look-through
entities. The de minimis partner rule
provides that for purposes of applying
the substantiality rules, the tax
attributes of de minimis partners need
not be taken into account and defines a
de minimis partner as any partner,
including a look-through entity that
owns, directly or indirectly, less than 10
percent of the capital and profits of a
partnership, and who is allocated less
than 10 percent of each partnership item
of income, gain, loss, deduction, and
credit. The intent of the de minimis
partner rule was to allow partnerships
to avoid the complexity of testing the
substantiality of insignificant
allocations to partners owning very
small interests in the partnership. It was
not intended to allow partnerships to
entirely avoid the application of the
substantiality regulations if the
partnership is owned by partners each
of whom owns less than 10 percent of
the capital or profits, and who are
allocated less than 10 percent of each
partnership item of income, gain, loss,
deduction, and credit. The IRS and the
Treasury Department have determined
that the de minimis partner rule should
be removed in order to prevent
unintended tax consequences. The IRS
and the Treasury Department request
comments on how to reduce the burden
of complying with the substantial
economic effect rules, with respect to
look-through partners, without
diminishing the safeguards the rules
provide.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Effective Date
These regulations are proposed to be
effective the date final regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has also been determined that § 553(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these
regulations, and because the regulation
does not impose a collection of
information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
§ 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code,
this notice of proposed rulemaking has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:38 Oct 24, 2011
Jkt 226001
66013
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
[EPA–R07–OAR–2011–0859; FRL–9482–8]
Before the proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS
and the Treasury Department request
comments on the clarity of the proposed
rules and how they can be made easier
to understand. All comments will be
available for public inspection and
copying. A public hearing may be
scheduled if requested in writing by any
person that timely submits written or
electronic comments. If a public hearing
is scheduled, notice of the date, time,
and place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Michala Irons, Office of
the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and the Treasury Department
participated in its development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR Part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. In § 1.704–1 paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(e) is removed.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–27575 Filed 10–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40 CFR Part 52
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Missouri; Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) for the 8Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to
conditionally approve a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Missouri to
EPA on January 17, 2007, with a
supplemental revision submitted to EPA
on June 1, 2011. The purpose of these
SIP revisions is to satisfy the RACT
requirements for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) set forth by the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) with respect
to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. In addition
to proposing approval on the 2007
submission, EPA is also proposing to
approve several VOC rules adopted by
Missouri and submitted to EPA in a
letter dated August 16, 2011 for
approval into its SIP. We are approving
these revisions because they enhance
the Missouri SIP by improving VOC
emission controls in Missouri. EPA’s
proposal to conditionally approve the
SIP submittal is consistent with section
110(k)(4) of the CAA. As part of the
conditional approval, Missouri would
have up to twelve months from the date
of EPA’s final conditional approval of
the SIP revisions in which to revise its
rules to be consistent with the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2011–0589, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery or Courier:
Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and
Development Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency Region 7, 901 North
5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2011–
0859. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 25, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66012-66013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27575]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-109564-10]
RIN 1545-BJ37
Partner's Distributive Share
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations removing Sec.
1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(e) (the de minimis partner rule) because the rule
may have resulted in unintended tax consequences. The proposed
regulations affect partnerships and their partners.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by January 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-109564-10), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
109564-10), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC; or sent electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-109564-10).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Michala Irons, at (202) 622-3050; concerning submission of comments, or
requests for a public hearing, Richard Hurst, at (202) 622-2949 (TDD
Telephone) (not toll free numbers) and his e-mail address is
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Subchapter K is intended to permit taxpayers to conduct joint
business activities through a flexible economic arrangement without
incurring an entity-level tax. To achieve this goal of a flexible
economic arrangement, partners are generally permitted to decide among
themselves how a partnership's items will be allocated. Section 704(a)
of the Internal Revenue Code provides that a partner's distributive
share of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit shall, except as
otherwise provided, be determined by the partnership agreement.
Section 704(b) places a significant limitation on the general
flexibility of section 704(a). Specifically, section 704(b) provides
that a partner's distributive share of income, gain, loss, deduction,
or credit (or item thereof) shall be determined in accordance with the
partner's interest in the partnership (determined by taking into
account all facts and circumstances) if the allocation to a partner
under the partnership agreement of income, gain, loss, deduction, or
credit (or item thereof) does not have substantial economic effect.
Thus, the statute provides that partnership allocations either must
have substantial economic effect or must be in accordance with the
partners' interests in the partnership.
Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(i) provides that the determination of whether
an allocation of income, gain, loss, or deduction to a partner has
substantial economic effect involves a two-part analysis that is made
as of the end of the partnership taxable year to which the allocation
relates. First, the allocation must have economic effect within the
meaning of Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii). Second, the economic effect of the
allocation must be substantial within the meaning of Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(iii).
For an allocation to have economic effect, it must be consistent
with the underlying economic arrangement of the partners. This means
that, in the event that there is an economic benefit or burden that
corresponds to the allocation, the partner to whom the allocation is
made must receive such economic benefit or bear such economic burden.
See Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii). Generally, an allocation of income, gain,
loss, or deduction (or item thereof) to a partner will have economic
effect if, and only if, throughout the full term of the partnership,
the partnership agreement provides: (1) for the determination and
maintenance of the partners' capital accounts in accordance with Sec.
1.704-1(b)(2)(iv); (2) for liquidating distributions to the partners to
be made in accordance with the positive capital account balances of the
partners; and (3) for each partner to be unconditionally obligated to
restore the deficit balance in the partner's capital account following
the liquidation of the partner's partnership interest. In lieu of
satisfying the third criterion, the partnership may satisfy the
qualified income offset rules set forth in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d).
Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(a) provides as a general rule that the
economic effect of an allocation (or allocations) is substantial if
there is a reasonable possibility that the allocation (or allocations)
will affect substantially the dollar amounts to be received by the
partners from the partnership, independent of tax consequences. This
section further provides that, even if the allocation affects
substantially the dollar amounts, the economic effect of the allocation
(or allocations) is not substantial if, at the time the allocation (or
allocations) becomes part of the partnership agreement: (1) The after-
tax economic consequences of at least one partner may, in present value
terms, be enhanced compared to such consequences if the allocation (or
allocations) were not contained in the partnership agreement, and (2)
there is a strong likelihood that the after-tax economic consequences
of no partner will, in present value terms, be substantially diminished
compared to such consequences if the allocation (or allocations) were
not contained in the partnership agreement.
[[Page 66013]]
Explanation of Provisions
Removal of De Minimis Partner Rule in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(e)
The de minimis partner rule in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(e) (TD
9398, 73 FR 28699-01) was promulgated on May 19, 2008, as part of final
regulations with respect to partners that are look-through entities.
The de minimis partner rule provides that for purposes of applying the
substantiality rules, the tax attributes of de minimis partners need
not be taken into account and defines a de minimis partner as any
partner, including a look-through entity that owns, directly or
indirectly, less than 10 percent of the capital and profits of a
partnership, and who is allocated less than 10 percent of each
partnership item of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit. The
intent of the de minimis partner rule was to allow partnerships to
avoid the complexity of testing the substantiality of insignificant
allocations to partners owning very small interests in the partnership.
It was not intended to allow partnerships to entirely avoid the
application of the substantiality regulations if the partnership is
owned by partners each of whom owns less than 10 percent of the capital
or profits, and who are allocated less than 10 percent of each
partnership item of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit. The IRS
and the Treasury Department have determined that the de minimis partner
rule should be removed in order to prevent unintended tax consequences.
The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments on how to reduce
the burden of complying with the substantial economic effect rules,
with respect to look-through partners, without diminishing the
safeguards the rules provide.
Proposed Effective Date
These regulations are proposed to be effective the date final
regulations are published in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also
been determined that Sec. 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because
the regulation does not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to Sec. 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
notice of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing
Before the proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments on the
clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to
understand. All comments will be available for public inspection and
copying. A public hearing may be scheduled if requested in writing by
any person that timely submits written or electronic comments. If a
public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for
the public hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Michala Irons, Office
of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries).
However, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department
participated in its development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR Part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. In Sec. 1.704-1 paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(e) is removed.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-27575 Filed 10-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P