Irish Potatoes Grown in Southeastern States; Suspension of Marketing Order Provisions, 65360-65362 [2011-27275]
Download as PDF
65360
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 930.158
[Amended]
2. In § 930.158:
A. Suspend paragraph (b)(1)
indefinitely.
■ B. In paragraph (c)(3), redesignate the
first two sentences as paragraph (c)(3)(i)
and the remaining sentences as
paragraph (c)(3)(ii).
■ C. Newly designated paragraph
(c)(3)(ii) is suspended indefinitely.
■
■
Dated: October 14, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–27276 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 953
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0027; FV11–953–1
FR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Southeastern
States; Suspension of Marketing Order
Provisions
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule continues in effect
the interim rule that suspended the
marketing order for Irish potatoes grown
in Southeastern states (order), and the
rules and regulations implemented
thereunder, through March 1, 2014. The
order regulates the handling of Irish
potatoes grown in Southeastern states
and is administered locally by the
Southeastern Potato Committee
(Committee). The Committee believes
advances in farming technology and
production quality have reduced the
need for the order. When considering
the costs associated with continuing the
order, the Committee unanimously
recommended that the order be
suspended.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: October 22, 2011
through March 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dawana J. Clark, Marketing Specialist,
or Kenneth G. Johnson, Regional
Manager, DC Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (301) 734–
5243, Fax: (301) 734–5275, or E-mail:
Dawana.Clark@ams.usda.gov or
Kenneth.Johnson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
regulation by contacting Laurel May,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 104 and Marketing Order No. 953,
both as amended (7 CFR part 953),
regulating the handling of Irish potatoes
grown in Southeastern states,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the
interim rule that suspended the order
and all provisions prescribed
thereunder through March 1, 2014. The
suspension includes, but is not limited
to, grade, size, quality, assessment,
reporting, and inspection requirements.
The Committee believes advances in
farming technology and production
quality have reduced the need for the
order. When considering the costs
associated with continuing the order,
the Committee agreed that the order
should be suspended. The Committee
met on February 17, 2011, and
unanimously recommended suspending
the order for three years, through March
1, 2014.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The order was promulgated in 1948,
and regulates the handling of Irish
potatoes grown in designated counties
of Virginia and North Carolina. The
order has been used to provide the
industry with grade, size, quality, and
inspection requirements. The order also
authorizes reporting and recordkeeping
functions required for the operation of
the order. The program is funded by
assessments imposed on handlers.
Over the past several years, the
Southeastern potato industry has been
in decline, with acreage and production
trending downward. Production has
fallen from an estimated 1,600,000
hundredweight for the 1996–97 season,
to a current estimate of 600,000
hundredweight for the 2010–11 season.
In 1996, there were approximately 150
growers and 60 handlers in the
production area. Currently, there are
approximately 20 growers and 10
handlers covered in the production area.
The Committee met February 17,
2011, to discuss the continued need for
the order. During the discussion, several
members mentioned that the order was
promulgated at a time when the
industry was having an issue with the
quality of potatoes being produced. The
purpose of the order was to establish
standards to improve the quality of
marketed product.
Since the implementation of the
order, the quality of Southeastern
potatoes has greatly improved.
Advances in farm machinery and
improvements in the grading process
have helped to ensure that only quality
product is being shipped to buyers.
Concerns the industry previously had
prior to implementation of the order are
no longer an issue, and for the past
several years, some industry members
have started questioning the continued
need for the order and its associated
costs.
At the meeting, members were
informed that to maintain the order, the
Committee would have to incur some
additional administrative expenses. To
cover these costs, the Committee would
need to increase the assessment rate.
Committee members agreed that the
industry would not support an
assessment increase.
In addition to the assessment costs,
comments were also made regarding the
cost of inspection by the Committee
required under the order. It was stated
that some industry members see the cost
of mandatory inspection as an
unnecessary burden. Other Committee
members expressed concern over
whether inspection would still be
available if the order was suspended.
This issue was resolved when members
were assured that inspection would still
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
be available for those who request it,
regardless of the status of the order.
Based on discussion at the meeting,
and on letters from growers who were
not able to attend, changes in the
industry and industry practices have
diminished the need for the order.
Further, there are concerns regarding
the costs associated with maintaining
the order, and no industry support for
raising assessments to cover increasing
administrative costs. Therefore, the
Committee unanimously recommended
suspending the order for three years,
through March 1, 2014.
The Committee recommended
suspension of the order, not
termination, to allow the industry an
opportunity to review the effectiveness
of operating without order
requirements. If problems develop,
Committee members wanted the
industry to have the alternative of
reactivating the order. During the
suspension period, the industry will be
able to monitor the Southeastern potato
industry to determine if quality issues
reoccur. A meeting will be held prior to
March 1, 2014, to review the state of the
industry and determine whether to
continue the suspension, or to reactivate
or terminate the order.
It is hereby determined that Federal
Marketing Order No. 953, and the rules
and regulations issued thereunder, do
not tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act. This action continues
to suspend, through March 1, 2014, the
provisions of Federal Marketing Order
No. 953, and the rules and regulations
issued thereunder, including but not
limited to: Provisions of the order
dealing with the establishment and the
responsibilities of the Committee;
provisions of the order dealing with
expenses and the collection of
assessments; all rules and regulations;
and, all information collection and
reporting requirements.
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 10 handlers
of Irish potatoes grown in Southeastern
states who are subject to regulation
under the order and approximately 20
potato producers in the regulated area.
Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $7,000,000,
and small agricultural producers are
defined as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Using AMS Market News Service
reported prices, the average f.o.b. price
for Southeastern potatoes for the 2010
marketing season was around $20 per
hundredweight. The Committee
estimated production for the 2010–11
season at approximately 600,000
hundredweight of potatoes. Based on
this information, average annual
receipts for handlers would be less than
$7,000,000. Information provided by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
indicates that the average producer
price for Irish potatoes grown in North
Carolina and Virginia in 2010 was
approximately $11.63 per
hundredweight. Considering estimated
production, average producer revenue
would be about $350,000 for the 2010–
11 season. Therefore, the majority of
Southeastern potato handlers and
producers may be classified as small
entities.
This rule continues in effect the
action that suspended the order and the
rules and regulations implemented
thereunder through March 1, 2014. The
Committee believes advances in farming
technology and production quality have
reduced the need for the order. When
considering the costs associated with
continuing the order, the Committee
unanimously recommended that the
order be suspended. The Committee
made this recommendation on February
17, 2011. Authority for this action is
provided in section 8c(16)(A) of the Act.
Suspension of the order and its
corresponding regulations relieves
handlers of quality, inspection, and
assessment burdens during the
suspension period. Also, handler
reports will not be required.
Additionally, growers may be relieved
of some costs, such as assessment
expenses, which are often passed onto
them by handlers. Suspension of the
order is therefore expected to reduce the
regulatory burden on handlers and
growers of all sizes.
The Committee considered
alternatives to this rule, including
maintaining the order or terminating it
rather than suspending. Support was
not shown for either of these options.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65361
Therefore these alternatives were
rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 13), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178). No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This final rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Southeastern potato handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies. In
addition, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
Southeastern potato industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the February 17,
2011, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express their views on this issue.
An interim rule concerning this action
was published in the Federal Register
on June 10, 2011 (76 FR 33967). Copies
of the rule were mailed or sent via
facsimile to all Committee members and
potato handlers. Finally, the rule was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and Office of the Federal
Register. A 60-day comment period
ending August 9, 2011, was provided to
allow interested persons to respond to
the rule.
One comment was received during
the comment period in response to the
rule. The commenter supported
suspending the marketing order for Irish
potatoes, but added that the better
choice would be to terminate the
marketing order in its entirety as it is
anti-competitive and raises prices for
consumers.
The points made by the commenter
were thoroughly discussed prior to the
Committee vote. During its discussions,
the Committee determined they would
like to provide the industry an
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
65362
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
opportunity to operate without
marketing order requirements in order
to review the effectiveness of the order.
During the suspension period, the
industry will be able to monitor the
quality of potatoes being shipped.
Should problems develop, suspension
of the order will provide the Committee
the alternative of reactivating the order.
Therefore, the Committee voted to
suspend, rather than terminate, the
marketing order.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule, based on the comment
received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that the order suspended by this final
rule, as hereinafter set forth, does not
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because handlers are aware
of this rule, which was recommended at
a public meeting. Also, a 60-day
comment period was provided for in the
interim rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 953
emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the interim rule that
suspended 7 CFR part 953 and that was
published at 76 FR 33967 on June 10,
2011, is adopted as a final rule, without
change.
Dated: October 14, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–27275 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 429 and 431
[Docket No. EERE–2011–BT–CE–0050]
RIN 1904–AC58
Energy Conservation Program:
Compliance Date Regarding the Test
Procedures for Walk-In Coolers and
Freezers and the Certification for Metal
Halide Lamp Ballasts and Fixtures
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document clarifies the
compliance date by which
manufacturers must begin to use
portions of a recently promulgated test
procedure (i.e., the April 15, 2011 final
rule) when certifying walk-in coolers
and walk-in freezers. This document
also adopts regulatory text changes to
reflect the U.S. Department of Energy’s
(DOE) intent that only manufacturers of
components of walk-in coolers and
walk-in freezers are required to submit
certification reports. Additionally, the
final rule clarifies the types of test data
needed to support the certification of
compliance pursuant to DOE’s existing
test procedures for walk-in coolers and
walk-in freezers and the recently
promulgated test procedure for this
equipment. Finally, DOE is adopting an
extension to the compliance date for
which manufacturers, including
importers, need to certify compliance to
the Department of metal halide lamp
ballasts and fixtures.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The docket (i.e., docket
number EERE–2011–BT–CE–0050 and/
or RIN number 1904–AC58) is available
for review at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
Federal Register notices, comments,
and other supporting documents/
materials. All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. However,
not all documents listed in the index
may be publicly available, such as
information that is exempt from public
disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Ashley Armstrong, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. E-mail:
Ashley.Armstrong@ee.doe.gov.
In the Office of the General Counsel,
contact Ms. Laura Barhydt, U.S.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, GC–32, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–5772. E-mail:
Laura.Barhydt@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Test Procedures
for Walk-In Coolers and Freezers
The Energy Policy and Conservation
Act (EPCA), as amended by section
312(c) of the Energy Independence and
Security Act (EISA 2007), requires the
Department of Energy (DOE) to
prescribe a test procedure to measure
the energy use of walk-in coolers and
freezers (collectively, walk-ins or
WICFs). See 42 U.S.C. 6314(a). DOE
recently satisfied this requirement by
issuing a final rule establishing a test
procedure for manufacturers to use
when measuring the energy use or
energy efficiency of certain walk-in
components: Panels, non-display doors,
display doors, and refrigeration systems.
See 76 FR 21580 (April 15, 2011) (final
rule prescribing walk-in test procedures)
and 76 FR 33631 (June 9, 2011) (notice
containing corrected formulas).
Since the publication of that
rulemaking, DOE recognized a need to
clarify the date by which manufacturers
must begin using the test procedure.
The SUMMARY and DATES sections of the
preamble text to the final rule stated
that the test procedures will be
mandatory for making representations of
energy usage or energy efficiency
starting October 12, 2011; that is, 180
days after publication of the test
procedure final rule. DOE published a
notice of proposed rulemaking on
August 9, 2011, which proposed to
clarify that the compliance date for
using the new test procedure for
certifications of compliance will be the
same as the compliance date for the
performance-based energy conservation
standards currently under development.
76 FR 48745. At this time, DOE plans
to issue the performance-based
standards final rule by 2012 and
manufacturers must comply with those
standards within three years of
publication of the final rule. Thus,
pending the completion of the
performance-based energy conservation
standards rulemaking, manufacturers
will be required to certify compliance to
those standards using the new test
procedure in 2015, unless DOE adopts
an alternative compliance date.1 Id.
In addition, DOE clarified the entity
responsible for certifying compliance to
1 DOE may also provide for a delayed effective
date if the Secretary determines this three-year
period is inadequate. (42 U.S.C. 6313(f)(4)(B))
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65360-65362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27275]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 953
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0027; FV11-953-1 FR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Southeastern States; Suspension of
Marketing Order Provisions
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule continues in effect the interim rule that suspended
the marketing order for Irish potatoes grown in Southeastern states
(order), and the rules and regulations implemented thereunder, through
March 1, 2014. The order regulates the handling of Irish potatoes grown
in Southeastern states and is administered locally by the Southeastern
Potato Committee (Committee). The Committee believes advances in
farming technology and production quality have reduced the need for the
order. When considering the costs associated with continuing the order,
the Committee unanimously recommended that the order be suspended.
DATES: Effective Date: October 22, 2011 through March 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dawana J. Clark, Marketing Specialist,
or Kenneth G. Johnson, Regional Manager, DC Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (301) 734-5243, Fax: (301) 734-5275, or E-mail:
Dawana.Clark@ams.usda.gov or Kenneth.Johnson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Laurel May, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 104 and Marketing Order No. 953, both as amended (7 CFR
part 953), regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in
Southeastern states, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The
order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the interim rule that suspended the
order and all provisions prescribed thereunder through March 1, 2014.
The suspension includes, but is not limited to, grade, size, quality,
assessment, reporting, and inspection requirements. The Committee
believes advances in farming technology and production quality have
reduced the need for the order. When considering the costs associated
with continuing the order, the Committee agreed that the order should
be suspended. The Committee met on February 17, 2011, and unanimously
recommended suspending the order for three years, through March 1,
2014.
The order was promulgated in 1948, and regulates the handling of
Irish potatoes grown in designated counties of Virginia and North
Carolina. The order has been used to provide the industry with grade,
size, quality, and inspection requirements. The order also authorizes
reporting and recordkeeping functions required for the operation of the
order. The program is funded by assessments imposed on handlers.
Over the past several years, the Southeastern potato industry has
been in decline, with acreage and production trending downward.
Production has fallen from an estimated 1,600,000 hundredweight for the
1996-97 season, to a current estimate of 600,000 hundredweight for the
2010-11 season. In 1996, there were approximately 150 growers and 60
handlers in the production area. Currently, there are approximately 20
growers and 10 handlers covered in the production area.
The Committee met February 17, 2011, to discuss the continued need
for the order. During the discussion, several members mentioned that
the order was promulgated at a time when the industry was having an
issue with the quality of potatoes being produced. The purpose of the
order was to establish standards to improve the quality of marketed
product.
Since the implementation of the order, the quality of Southeastern
potatoes has greatly improved. Advances in farm machinery and
improvements in the grading process have helped to ensure that only
quality product is being shipped to buyers. Concerns the industry
previously had prior to implementation of the order are no longer an
issue, and for the past several years, some industry members have
started questioning the continued need for the order and its associated
costs.
At the meeting, members were informed that to maintain the order,
the Committee would have to incur some additional administrative
expenses. To cover these costs, the Committee would need to increase
the assessment rate. Committee members agreed that the industry would
not support an assessment increase.
In addition to the assessment costs, comments were also made
regarding the cost of inspection by the Committee required under the
order. It was stated that some industry members see the cost of
mandatory inspection as an unnecessary burden. Other Committee members
expressed concern over whether inspection would still be available if
the order was suspended. This issue was resolved when members were
assured that inspection would still
[[Page 65361]]
be available for those who request it, regardless of the status of the
order.
Based on discussion at the meeting, and on letters from growers who
were not able to attend, changes in the industry and industry practices
have diminished the need for the order. Further, there are concerns
regarding the costs associated with maintaining the order, and no
industry support for raising assessments to cover increasing
administrative costs. Therefore, the Committee unanimously recommended
suspending the order for three years, through March 1, 2014.
The Committee recommended suspension of the order, not termination,
to allow the industry an opportunity to review the effectiveness of
operating without order requirements. If problems develop, Committee
members wanted the industry to have the alternative of reactivating the
order. During the suspension period, the industry will be able to
monitor the Southeastern potato industry to determine if quality issues
reoccur. A meeting will be held prior to March 1, 2014, to review the
state of the industry and determine whether to continue the suspension,
or to reactivate or terminate the order.
It is hereby determined that Federal Marketing Order No. 953, and
the rules and regulations issued thereunder, do not tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act. This action continues to suspend,
through March 1, 2014, the provisions of Federal Marketing Order No.
953, and the rules and regulations issued thereunder, including but not
limited to: Provisions of the order dealing with the establishment and
the responsibilities of the Committee; provisions of the order dealing
with expenses and the collection of assessments; all rules and
regulations; and, all information collection and reporting
requirements.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 10 handlers of Irish potatoes grown in
Southeastern states who are subject to regulation under the order and
approximately 20 potato producers in the regulated area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than
$7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Using AMS Market News Service reported prices, the average f.o.b.
price for Southeastern potatoes for the 2010 marketing season was
around $20 per hundredweight. The Committee estimated production for
the 2010-11 season at approximately 600,000 hundredweight of potatoes.
Based on this information, average annual receipts for handlers would
be less than $7,000,000. Information provided by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service indicates that the average producer
price for Irish potatoes grown in North Carolina and Virginia in 2010
was approximately $11.63 per hundredweight. Considering estimated
production, average producer revenue would be about $350,000 for the
2010-11 season. Therefore, the majority of Southeastern potato handlers
and producers may be classified as small entities.
This rule continues in effect the action that suspended the order
and the rules and regulations implemented thereunder through March 1,
2014. The Committee believes advances in farming technology and
production quality have reduced the need for the order. When
considering the costs associated with continuing the order, the
Committee unanimously recommended that the order be suspended. The
Committee made this recommendation on February 17, 2011. Authority for
this action is provided in section 8c(16)(A) of the Act.
Suspension of the order and its corresponding regulations relieves
handlers of quality, inspection, and assessment burdens during the
suspension period. Also, handler reports will not be required.
Additionally, growers may be relieved of some costs, such as assessment
expenses, which are often passed onto them by handlers. Suspension of
the order is therefore expected to reduce the regulatory burden on
handlers and growers of all sizes.
The Committee considered alternatives to this rule, including
maintaining the order or terminating it rather than suspending. Support
was not shown for either of these options. Therefore these alternatives
were rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
chapter 13), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178). No changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Southeastern potato
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the Southeastern potato industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the February 17, 2011,
meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express their views on this issue.
An interim rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on June 10, 2011 (76 FR 33967). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and potato handlers.
Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by USDA and
Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending August
9, 2011, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to the
rule.
One comment was received during the comment period in response to
the rule. The commenter supported suspending the marketing order for
Irish potatoes, but added that the better choice would be to terminate
the marketing order in its entirety as it is anti-competitive and
raises prices for consumers.
The points made by the commenter were thoroughly discussed prior to
the Committee vote. During its discussions, the Committee determined
they would like to provide the industry an
[[Page 65362]]
opportunity to operate without marketing order requirements in order to
review the effectiveness of the order. During the suspension period,
the industry will be able to monitor the quality of potatoes being
shipped. Should problems develop, suspension of the order will provide
the Committee the alternative of reactivating the order. Therefore, the
Committee voted to suspend, rather than terminate, the marketing order.
Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rule, based on the
comment received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Laurel May at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that the order suspended by
this final rule, as hereinafter set forth, does not tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because handlers are aware of this
rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 60-day comment
period was provided for in the interim rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 953
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the interim rule that suspended 7 CFR part 953 and
that was published at 76 FR 33967 on June 10, 2011, is adopted as a
final rule, without change.
Dated: October 14, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-27275 Filed 10-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P