Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes, 65419-65421 [2011-27264]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
as specified in paragraphs (d) and (e) of
this section.
(3) Failed lot reporting. If a lot fails to
meet the aflatoxin requirements of this
part, the testing laboratory shall
complete an Imported Pistachios—
Failed Lot Notification report (Form FV–
249) as described in paragraph (h)(1) of
this section, and shall submit it to
Customs, the importer, and USDA
within 10 working days of the test
failure. This form must be completed
and submitted each time a lot fails
aflatoxin testing.
(h) Reports and recordkeeping. (1)
Form FV–249 Imported Pistachios—
Failed Lot Notification. Each USDA or
USDA-accredited laboratory shall notify
the importer; Customs; and the
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; of all lots that fail to meet
the maximum aflatoxin requirements by
completing this form and submitting it
within 10 days of failed aflatoxin
testing.
(2) Form FV–251 Imported
Pistachios—Rework and Failed Lot
Disposition. Each importer who reworks
a failing lot of pistachios shall complete
this report and shall forward it to
Customs and the Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, no
later than 10 days after the rework is
completed. If rework is not selected as
a remedy, the importer shall complete
and submit this form within 10 days of
alternate disposition of the lot.
(i) Exemptions. Any importer may
import pistachios free of the
requirements of this section if such
importer imports a quantity not
exceeding a total of 5,000 dried pounds
between September 1 and August 31 of
each year. Substandard pistachios
imported for use in non-human
consumption outlets shall be subject to
the safeguard provisions contained in
§ 999.500.
(j) Reconditioning prior to
importation. Nothing contained in this
section shall be deemed to preclude
reconditioning pistachios prior to
importation, in order that such
pistachios may be made eligible to meet
the applicable aflatoxin regulations
prescribed in paragraphs (c) through (f)
of this section.
(k) Comingling. Certified lots of
pistachios may be comingled with other
certified lots, but the comingling of
certified lots and uncertified lots shall
cause the loss of certification for the
comingled lots.
(l) Retesting. Whenever USDA has
reason to believe that imported
pistachios may have been damaged or
deteriorated while in storage, USDA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
may reject the then effective inspection
certificate and may require the owner of
the pistachios to have them retested to
establish whether or not such pistachios
may be shipped for human
consumption.
(m) Compliance. Any person who
violates any provision of this section
shall be subject to a forfeiture in the
amount prescribed in section 8a(5) of
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601–
674), or, upon conviction, a penalty in
the amount prescribed in section 8c(14)
of the said Act, or to both such forfeiture
and penalty. False representation to any
agency of the United States on any
matter within its jurisdiction, knowing
it to be false, is a violation of 18 U.S.C.
1001, which provides for a fine or
imprisonments or both.
(n) Other import requirements. The
provisions of this section do not
supersede any restrictions or
prohibitions on pistachios under the
Federal Plant Quarantine Act of 1912, or
any other applicable laws or regulations
of city, county, State, or Federal
Agencies including the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Dated: October 14, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–27285 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1139; Directorate
Identifier 2011–CE–021–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
SOCATA Model TBM 700 airplanes.
This proposed AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition
on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
A TBM 700 operator reported a case of
inverted installation of aileron control cables
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65419
in the wing. The shortest cable was found
installed instead of the longest one on wing
tip side, with left hand (LH) threaded end in
upper section. This wrong installation could
have been caused by mistaken maintenance
data.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to restricted movement
of the aileron, resulting in reduced control of
the aeroplane, particularly when operating
under adverse flight conditions on landing
and during avoidance manoeuvres.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact SOCATA—
Direction des Services—65921 Tarbes
Cedex 9—France; telephone +33 (0) 62
41 7300, fax +33 (0) 62 41 76 54, or for
North America: SOCATA NORTH
AMERICA, 7501 South Airport Road,
North Perry Airport (HWO), Pembroke
Pines, Florida 33023; telephone: (954)
893–1400; fax: (954) 964–4141; e-mail:
mysocata@socata.daher.com; Internet:
https://mysocata.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (816) 329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
65420
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4119; fax: (816) 329–4090; e-mail:
albert.mercado@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1139; Directorate Identifier
2011–CE–021–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.:
2011–0101, dated May 25, 2011
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
A TBM 700 operator reported a case of
inverted installation of aileron control cables
in the wing. The shortest cable was found
installed instead of the longest one on wing
tip side, with left hand (LH) threaded end in
upper section. This wrong installation could
have been caused by mistaken maintenance
data.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to restricted movement
of the aileron, resulting in reduced control of
the aeroplane, particularly when operating
under adverse flight conditions on landing
and during avoidance manoeuvres.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires an inspection to verify the correct
installation of the aileron control cables and,
in case of discrepancies, proper reinstallation of the cables in accordance with
the approved design configuration.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Even with potentially reduced aileron
deflection, Socata’s analysis shows that
the airplane is still capable of achieving
its published cross wind landing limits.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
Relevant Service Information
DAHER–SOCATA has issued
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70–191–
27, dated April 2011; SOCATA TBM
700 Model Maintenance Manual
Temporary Revision No. TR040.27,
dated April 2011; and SOCATA TBM
850 Maintenance Manual Temporary
Revision No. TR015.27, dated April
2011. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 404 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about .5 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $0 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $17,170, or $43 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 16 work-hours and require parts
costing $0, for a cost of $1,360 per
product. We have no way of
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 204 / Friday, October 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
SOCATA: Docket No. FAA–2011–1139;
Directorate Identifier 2011–CE–021–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
December 5, 2011.
FAA AD Differences
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to SOCATA Model
TBM 700 airplanes, serial numbers (SN) 1
through 572, 574, and 576, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 27: Flight Controls.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
A TBM 700 operator reported a case of
inverted installation of aileron control cables
in the wing. The shortest cable was found
installed instead of the longest one on wing
tip side, with left hand (LH) threaded end in
upper section. This wrong installation could
have been caused by mistaken maintenance
data.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to restricted movement
of the aileron, resulting in reduced control of
the aeroplane, particularly when operating
under adverse flight conditions on landing
and during avoidance manoeuvres.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires an inspection to verify the correct
installation of the aileron control cables and,
in case of discrepancies, proper reinstallation of the cables in accordance with
the approved design configuration.
Even with potentially reduced aileron
deflection, Socata’s analysis shows that the
airplane is still capable of achieving its
published cross wind landing limits.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Within 12 months after the effective
date of this AD or within 100 hours time-inservice (TIS) after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the
aileron control cables in left and right wings
for proper installation following the
accomplishment instructions of DAHER–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 20, 2011
Jkt 226001
SOCATA Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70–
191–27, dated April 2011.
(2) If during the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD you find the
cables are improperly installed, before
further flight, remove the cables and correctly
re-install the cables following the
accomplishment instructions of DAHER–
SOCATA Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70–
191–27, dated April 2011.
(3) After the effective date of this AD, after
each removal of the aileron control cables,
you must re-install using the maintenance
manual temporary revisions below:
(i) For S/N 1 through 433: SOCATA TBM
700 Model Maintenance Manual Temporary
Revision No. TR040.27, dated April 2011.
(ii) For S/N 434 through 572, 574 and 576:
SOCATA TBM 850 Maintenance Manual
Temporary Revision No. TR015.27, dated
April 2011.
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: The
compliance time of the MCAI is 12 months
after the effective day of the AD. This differs
from the service bulletin of 12 months or 100
hours TIS, whichever occurs first. To assure
that the unsafe condition is addressed on all
airplanes in a timely manner, the FAA is
using the compliance time from the service
bulletin.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4119; fax: (816) 329–
4090; e-mail: albert.mercado@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, a federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
65421
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2011–0101,
dated May 25, 2011; DAHER–SOCATA
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70–191–27,
dated April 2011; SOCATA TBM 700 Model
Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision
No. TR040.27, dated April 2011; and
SOCATA TBM 850 Maintenance Manual
Temporary Revision No. TR015.27, dated
April 2011, for related information. For
service information related to this AD,
contact SOCATA—Direction des Services—
65921 Tarbes Cedex 9—France; telephone
+33 (0) 62 41 7300, fax +33 (0) 62 41 76 54,
or for North America: SOCATA NORTH
AMERICA, 7501 South Airport Road, North
Perry Airport (HWO), Pembroke Pines,
Florida 33023; telephone: (954) 893–1400;
fax: (954) 964–4141; e-mail:
mysocata@socata.daher.com; Internet: https://
mysocata.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 14, 2011.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–27264 Filed 10–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1155; Directorate
Identifier 2011–CE–032–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; SchemppHirth Flugzeugbau GmbH Gliders
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Schempp-Hirth Flugzeugbau GmbH
Model Discus 2cT gliders. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 204 (Friday, October 21, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65419-65421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27264]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1139; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-021-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
SOCATA Model TBM 700 airplanes. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
A TBM 700 operator reported a case of inverted installation of
aileron control cables in the wing. The shortest cable was found
installed instead of the longest one on wing tip side, with left
hand (LH) threaded end in upper section. This wrong installation
could have been caused by mistaken maintenance data.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
restricted movement of the aileron, resulting in reduced control of
the aeroplane, particularly when operating under adverse flight
conditions on landing and during avoidance manoeuvres.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 5,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
SOCATA--Direction des Services--65921 Tarbes Cedex 9--France; telephone
+33 (0) 62 41 7300, fax +33 (0) 62 41 76 54, or for North America:
SOCATA NORTH AMERICA, 7501 South Airport Road, North Perry Airport
(HWO), Pembroke Pines, Florida 33023; telephone: (954) 893-1400; fax:
(954) 964-4141; e-mail: mysocata@socata.daher.com; Internet: https://mysocata.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
[[Page 65420]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816) 329-4090; e-mail:
albert.mercado@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1139;
Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-021-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2011-0101, dated May 25, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
A TBM 700 operator reported a case of inverted installation of
aileron control cables in the wing. The shortest cable was found
installed instead of the longest one on wing tip side, with left
hand (LH) threaded end in upper section. This wrong installation
could have been caused by mistaken maintenance data.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
restricted movement of the aileron, resulting in reduced control of
the aeroplane, particularly when operating under adverse flight
conditions on landing and during avoidance manoeuvres.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires an inspection
to verify the correct installation of the aileron control cables
and, in case of discrepancies, proper re-installation of the cables
in accordance with the approved design configuration.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Even with potentially reduced aileron deflection, Socata's analysis
shows that the airplane is still capable of achieving its published
cross wind landing limits.
Relevant Service Information
DAHER-SOCATA has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-191-27,
dated April 2011; SOCATA TBM 700 Model Maintenance Manual Temporary
Revision No. TR040.27, dated April 2011; and SOCATA TBM 850 Maintenance
Manual Temporary Revision No. TR015.27, dated April 2011. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 404 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about .5 work-hour per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $0 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $17,170, or $43 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 16 work-hours and require parts costing $0, for a cost of
$1,360 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
[[Page 65421]]
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
SOCATA: Docket No. FAA-2011-1139; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-
021-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 5, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to SOCATA Model TBM 700 airplanes, serial
numbers (SN) 1 through 572, 574, and 576, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
A TBM 700 operator reported a case of inverted installation of
aileron control cables in the wing. The shortest cable was found
installed instead of the longest one on wing tip side, with left
hand (LH) threaded end in upper section. This wrong installation
could have been caused by mistaken maintenance data.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
restricted movement of the aileron, resulting in reduced control of
the aeroplane, particularly when operating under adverse flight
conditions on landing and during avoidance manoeuvres.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires an inspection
to verify the correct installation of the aileron control cables
and, in case of discrepancies, proper re-installation of the cables
in accordance with the approved design configuration.
Even with potentially reduced aileron deflection, Socata's
analysis shows that the airplane is still capable of achieving its
published cross wind landing limits.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD or
within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the aileron control cables
in left and right wings for proper installation following the
accomplishment instructions of DAHER-SOCATA Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 70-191-27, dated April 2011.
(2) If during the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD you find the cables are improperly installed, before further
flight, remove the cables and correctly re-install the cables
following the accomplishment instructions of DAHER-SOCATA Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-191-27, dated April 2011.
(3) After the effective date of this AD, after each removal of
the aileron control cables, you must re-install using the
maintenance manual temporary revisions below:
(i) For S/N 1 through 433: SOCATA TBM 700 Model Maintenance
Manual Temporary Revision No. TR040.27, dated April 2011.
(ii) For S/N 434 through 572, 574 and 576: SOCATA TBM 850
Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision No. TR015.27, dated April
2011.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: The compliance time of the MCAI is 12 months after the
effective day of the AD. This differs from the service bulletin of
12 months or 100 hours TIS, whichever occurs first. To assure that
the unsafe condition is addressed on all airplanes in a timely
manner, the FAA is using the compliance time from the service
bulletin.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816) 329-4090; e-mail:
albert.mercado@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2011-0101, dated May 25, 2011; DAHER-SOCATA Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 70-191-27, dated April 2011; SOCATA TBM 700 Model
Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision No. TR040.27, dated April
2011; and SOCATA TBM 850 Maintenance Manual Temporary Revision No.
TR015.27, dated April 2011, for related information. For service
information related to this AD, contact SOCATA--Direction des
Services--65921 Tarbes Cedex 9--France; telephone +33 (0) 62 41
7300, fax +33 (0) 62 41 76 54, or for North America: SOCATA NORTH
AMERICA, 7501 South Airport Road, North Perry Airport (HWO),
Pembroke Pines, Florida 33023; telephone: (954) 893-1400; fax: (954)
964-4141; e-mail: mysocata@socata.daher.com; Internet: https://mysocata.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 14, 2011.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-27264 Filed 10-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P