Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) Airplanes, 64857-64859 [2011-27011]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(j) For all airplanes, except for Model A319
series airplanes on which modifications
28238, 28162, and 28342 have been
incorporated, replacing both FWCs in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–31–1334, dated July 30, 2009; Revision
01, dated December 14, 2009; or Revision 02,
dated September 13, 2010; or Revision 03,
dated March 15, 2011; before the effective
date of this AD is acceptable for compliance
with the corresponding replacement required
by paragraph (i) of this AD.
(k) Replacing both FWCs in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A320–31–1141,
dated March 6, 2000; Revision 01, dated May
25, 2000; Revision 02, dated January 22,
2001; or Revision 03, dated June 12, 2001;
before the effective date of this AD is
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding installation specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD.
Parts Installation
(l) As of the effective date of this AD, and
after accomplishing the actions in paragraph
(i) of this AD, no person may install a FWC
with a P/N listed in table 1 of this AD on any
airplane.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Related Information
(n) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011–0001, dated January 10, 2011;
Jkt 226001
[FR Doc. 2011–27026 Filed 10–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1089; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–110–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
Other FAA AD Provisions
(m) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone
425–227–2141; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
16:22 Oct 18, 2011
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
11, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model BD–100–1A10 (Challenger
300) Airplanes
FAA AD Differences
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–31–1106,
Revision 04, dated December 21, 1999;
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A320–31–
1106, Revision 05, dated September 21, 2000;
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–31–1141,
Revision 04, dated February 14, 2002; and
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–31–1334,
Revision 04, including Appendix 01, dated
September 12, 2011; for related information.
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
During a routine inspection, deformation
was found at the neck of the pressure
regulator body on the oxygen Cylinder and
Regulator Assemblies (CRA) of a BD–700–
1A11 aeroplane.
An investigation by the vendor * * *
revealed that the deformation was attributed
to two (2) batches of raw material that did not
meet the required tensile strength. This may
cause elongation of the pressure regulator
neck, which could result in rupture of the
oxygen cylinder and in the case of cabin
depressurization, oxygen not being available
when required.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64857
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401;
e-mail thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7318; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1089; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–110–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
64858
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2011–09,
dated May 13, 2011 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
During a routine inspection, deformation
was found at the neck of the pressure
regulator body on the oxygen Cylinder and
Regulator Assemblies (CRA) of a BD–700–
1A11 aeroplane.
An investigation by the vendor, Avox
Systems Inc., revealed that the deformation
was attributed to two (2) batches of raw
material that did not meet the required
tensile strength. This may cause elongation of
the pressure regulator neck, which could
result in rupture of the oxygen cylinder and
in the case of cabin depressurization, oxygen
not being available when required.
Although there have been no reported
failures to date on any Model BD–100–1A10
aeroplanes, oxygen pressure regulators, Part
Numbers (P/N) 806370–06 and 806370–14
could be part of the affected batches.
This [Canadian] directive mandates [an
inspection to determine if a certain oxygen
CRA is installed and] the replacement of
oxygen CRAs containing pressure regulators
that do not meet the required material
properties.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Service
Bulletin 100–35–05, Revision 02, dated
January 31, 2011. The actions described
in this service information are intended
to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 226001
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 79 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists
required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that
there will be no charge for these parts.
As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may
incur costs higher than estimated here.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $20,145, or $255 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2011–
1089; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–
110–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
December 5, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
Model BD–100–1A10 (Challenger 300)
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 20003 and subsequent.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 35: Oxygen.
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During a routine inspection, deformation
was found at the neck of the pressure
regulator body on the oxygen Cylinder and
Regulator Assemblies (CRA) of a BD–700–
1A11 aeroplane.
An investigation by the vendor * * *
revealed that the deformation was attributed
to two (2) batches of raw material that did not
meet the required tensile strength. This may
cause elongation of the pressure regulator
neck, which could result in rupture of the
oxygen cylinder and in the case of cabin
depressurization, oxygen not being available
when required.
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) For airplanes having serial numbers
20003 through 20291 inclusive: Within 750
flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
do an inspection of oxygen pressure
regulators having P/N 806370–06 or 806370–
14, to determine the serial number, in
accordance with paragraph 2.B.(2) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 100–35–05, Revision 02,
dated January 31, 2011.
(1) If the serial number of the oxygen
pressure regulator is listed in Table 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 100–35–05, Revision 02,
dated January 31, 2011, replace the affected
oxygen CRA, in accordance with paragraph
2.C. of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 100–35–05,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011.
(2) If the serial number of the oxygen
pressure regulator is not listed in Table 2 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 100–35–05,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011, no
further action is required by this paragraph.
Parts Installation
(h) For all airplanes: As of the effective
date of this AD, no person may install an
oxygen pressure regulator (P/N 806370–06 or
806370–14) having any serial number listed
in Table 2 of Bombardier Service Bulletin
100–35–05, Revision 02, dated January 31,
2011, on any airplane, unless a suffix ‘‘-A’’
is beside the serial number.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
The MCAI applicability specifies only
airplanes having certain serial numbers and
prohibits installation of the affected part on
those airplanes. Because the affected part
could be rotated onto any of the Model BD–
100–1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes, this
AD applies to serial numbers 20003 and
subsequent. This difference has been
coordinated with Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 226001
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2011–09, dated May 13, 2011;
and Bombardier Service Bulletin 100–35–05,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011; for
related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
11, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–27011 Filed 10–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 43
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0763; Notice No. 11–
05]
RIN 2120–AJ91
Pilot Loading of Navigation and Terrain
Awareness Database Updates
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to amend
the maintenance regulations by
removing from the preventive
maintenance category the task of
updating databases used in selfcontained, front-panel or pedestal-
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64859
mounted navigation equipment. This
change would allow pilots who operate
certificated aircraft to update the
specified databases and eliminate the
requirement for certificated mechanics
or repair stations to perform the update.
The effect of this revision would be to
ensure that pilots using specified
navigation equipment have the most
current and accurate navigational data
and thereby increase aviation safety.
DATES: Send comments on or before
December 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number [Docket No. FAA–
2011–0763; Notice No. 11–05] using any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78), as
well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions about this
rulemaking action, contact Chris Parfitt,
Flight Standards Service, Aircraft
Maintenance Division—Avionics
Maintenance Branch, AFS–360, Federal
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64857-64859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1089; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-110-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10
(Challenger 300) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During a routine inspection, deformation was found at the neck
of the pressure regulator body on the oxygen Cylinder and Regulator
Assemblies (CRA) of a BD-700-1A11 aeroplane.
An investigation by the vendor * * * revealed that the
deformation was attributed to two (2) batches of raw material that
did not meet the required tensile strength. This may cause
elongation of the pressure regulator neck, which could result in
rupture of the oxygen cylinder and in the case of cabin
depressurization, oxygen not being available when required.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 5,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; e-mail
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7318; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1089;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-110-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will
[[Page 64858]]
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2011-09, dated May 13, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
During a routine inspection, deformation was found at the neck
of the pressure regulator body on the oxygen Cylinder and Regulator
Assemblies (CRA) of a BD-700-1A11 aeroplane.
An investigation by the vendor, Avox Systems Inc., revealed that
the deformation was attributed to two (2) batches of raw material
that did not meet the required tensile strength. This may cause
elongation of the pressure regulator neck, which could result in
rupture of the oxygen cylinder and in the case of cabin
depressurization, oxygen not being available when required.
Although there have been no reported failures to date on any
Model BD-100-1A10 aeroplanes, oxygen pressure regulators, Part
Numbers (P/N) 806370-06 and 806370-14 could be part of the affected
batches.
This [Canadian] directive mandates [an inspection to determine
if a certain oxygen CRA is installed and] the replacement of oxygen
CRAs containing pressure regulators that do not meet the required
material properties.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 100-35-05, Revision 02,
dated January 31, 2011. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 79 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 3 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these parts.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $20,145, or $255 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2011-1089; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-110-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 5, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10
(Challenger 300) airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 20003 and subsequent.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35: Oxygen.
[[Page 64859]]
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During a routine inspection, deformation was found at the neck
of the pressure regulator body on the oxygen Cylinder and Regulator
Assemblies (CRA) of a BD-700-1A11 aeroplane.
An investigation by the vendor * * * revealed that the
deformation was attributed to two (2) batches of raw material that
did not meet the required tensile strength. This may cause
elongation of the pressure regulator neck, which could result in
rupture of the oxygen cylinder and in the case of cabin
depressurization, oxygen not being available when required.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) For airplanes having serial numbers 20003 through 20291
inclusive: Within 750 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, do an inspection of oxygen pressure regulators having P/N
806370-06 or 806370-14, to determine the serial number, in
accordance with paragraph 2.B.(2) of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 100-35-05, Revision 02, dated January
31, 2011.
(1) If the serial number of the oxygen pressure regulator is
listed in Table 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 100-35-05, Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011,
replace the affected oxygen CRA, in accordance with paragraph 2.C.
of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
100-35-05, Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011.
(2) If the serial number of the oxygen pressure regulator is not
listed in Table 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 100-35-05, Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011, no
further action is required by this paragraph.
Parts Installation
(h) For all airplanes: As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an oxygen pressure regulator (P/N 806370-06 or
806370-14) having any serial number listed in Table 2 of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 100-35-05, Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011, on
any airplane, unless a suffix ``-A'' is beside the serial number.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
The MCAI applicability specifies only airplanes having certain
serial numbers and prohibits installation of the affected part on
those airplanes. Because the affected part could be rotated onto any
of the Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes, this AD applies
to serial numbers 20003 and subsequent. This difference has been
coordinated with Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA).
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-09,
dated May 13, 2011; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 100-35-05,
Revision 02, dated January 31, 2011; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 11, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-27011 Filed 10-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P