Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan Engines, 64844-64847 [2011-27006]
Download as PDF
64844
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
sugar beets, in-process sugars, or
molasses; and
(2) Sugar must have been processed in
the United States.
(b) Sugar or in-process sugar
purchased directly from any domestic
sugar beet and sugarcane processor that
made the sugar or in-process sugar must
be credited against its sugar marketing
allocation to be eligible for purchase
under this program.
(c) CCC will purchase sugar located in
the United States.
(d) CCC will only purchase an eligible
commodity if the purchased commodity
would reduce the likelihood of
forfeitures of CCC sugar loans, as
determined by CCC.
(e) CCC will evaluate an offer to sell
an eligible commodity to CCC based
upon CCC’s estimate of the reduction in
refined sugar supply available for
human consumption due to the
purchase. For example, if processing the
thick juice would yield 70 percent sugar
for human consumption, then CCC will
only consider 70 percent of the sugar in
the thick juice in evaluating the per unit
sales price.
§ 1435.603
Eligible sugar seller.
Eligible sugar buyer.
(a) To be considered an eligible sugar
buyer, the bioenergy producer must
produce bioenergy products, including
fuel grade ethanol or other biofuels.
(b) The bioenergy producer and its
production facilities that use CCC sugar
or in-process sugar must be located in
the United States.
§ 1435.605
Competitive procedures.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) CCC will generally submit tenders
for bids, before entering into contracts
with any eligible sugar seller and buyer
that minimize CCC net outlays.
(b) CCC may, at times, negotiate
contracts directly with sellers or buyers,
if CCC determines that such negotiation
will result in either reduced likelihood
of forfeited sugar under the CCC sugar
loan program or reduced costs of
removing sugar from the market, which
will reduce the likelihood of sugar
forfeited to CCC.
§ 1435.606
Miscellaneous.
(a) As a sugar buyer, the bioenergy
producer must take possession of the
sugar or in-process sugar no more than
30 days from the date of CCC’s
purchase.
(b) CCC, to the maximum extent
practicable, will not pay storage fees for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 226001
14 CFR Part 39
Examining the AD Docket
§ 1435.607
Appeals.
(a) The administrative appeal
regulations of parts 11 and 780 of this
title apply to this part.
(b) [Reserved]
Signed at Washington, DC, on October 13,
2011.
Bruce Nelson,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011–26974 Filed 10–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0068; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–05–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
(a) To be considered an eligible sugar
seller, the sugar seller must be located
in the United States.
(b) [Reserved]
§ 1435.604
Federal Aviation Administration
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact General Electric
Company, GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1
Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215,
phone: 513–552–3272; e-mail:
geae.aoc@ge.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
sugar or in-process sugar purchased
under this program.
(c) Each bioenergy producer that
purchases sugar through FFP must
provide proof to CCC that the sugar has
been used in the bioenergy factory for
the production of bioenergy.
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede two
existing airworthiness directives (ADs)
that apply to General Electric Company
(GE) CF6–45 and CF6–50 series turbofan
engines with certain low-pressure
turbine (LPT) rotor stage 3 disks
installed. The existing ADs currently
require inspections of high pressure
turbine (HPT) and LPT rotors, engine
checks, and surveys. Since we issued
those ADs, GE has determined that the
low-cycle fatigue (LCF) lives of the LPT
rotor stage 3 disks affected by those ADs
are below the current published engine
manual life limits and has introduced a
new LPT rotor stage 3 disk part number.
This proposed AD would establish a
new lower life limit for the LPT rotor
stage 3 disks. We are proposing this AD
to prevent critical life-limited rotating
engine part failure, which could result
in an uncontained engine failure and
damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tomasz Rakowski, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7735; fax: 781–238–
7199; e-mail: tomasz.rakowski@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–0068; Directorate Identifier
2010–NE–05–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion
On January 14, 2011, we issued AD
2011–02–07, Amendment 39–16580 (76
FR 6323, February 4, 2011), for GE CF6–
45 and CF6–50 series turbofan engines
with certain LPT rotor stage 3 disks
installed. That AD requires initial and
repetitive HPT rotor stage 1 and stage 2
blade inspections for wear and damage,
including excessive airfoil material loss,
and initial and repetitive exhaust gas
temperature (EGT) system checks
(inspections). That AD also requires a
one-time ultrasonic inspection (UI) of
the LPT rotor stage 3 disk forward
spacer arm, fluorescent penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the LPT rotor stage
3 disk under certain conditions, and
removal of cracked disks from service
before further flight. That AD also
requires initial and repetitive engine
core vibration surveys and reporting to
the FAA any crack findings, disks that
fail the UI, and engines that fail the
engine core vibration survey. That AD
resulted from reports received of
additional causes of HPT rotor
imbalance not addressed in AD 2010–
12–10, Amendment 39–16331 (75 FR
32649, June 9, 2010), and from two
additional LPT rotor stage 3 disk events
since the original AD 2010–06–15,
Amendment 39–16240 (75 FR 12661,
March 17, 2010) was issued.
On August 15, 2011, we issued AD
2011–18–01, Amendment 39–16783 (76
FR 52213, August 22, 2011) to require
performing an FPI of the LPT rotor stage
3 disk forward spacer arm at every shop
visit when the LPT module assembly is
separated from the engine. That AD
resulted from seven reports of
uncontained failures of LPT rotor stage
3 disks and eight reports of cracked LPT
rotor stage 3 disks found during shop
visit inspections.
We issued those ADs to prevent
critical life-limited rotating engine part
failure, which could result in an
uncontained engine failure and damage
to the airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2011–02–07,
Amendment 39–16580 (76 FR 6323,
February 4, 2011), GE has determined
that the LCF lives of the LPT rotor stage
3 disks affected by that AD were below
the current published manual life limits,
and has introduced a new LPT rotor
stage 3 disk part number. Moreover, we
no longer require the reporting of
inspection findings to the FAA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 226001
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain the
requirements of AD 2011–02–07
Amendment 39–16580 (76 FR 6323,
February 4, 2011), and AD 2011–18–01,
Amendment 39–16783 (76 FR 52213,
August 22, 2011), except that reporting
to the FAA would no longer be required
and there would be an optional LPT
rotor stage 3 disk removal after a failed
HPT blade borescope inspection or a
failed engine core vibration survey. This
proposed AD would also establish a
new lower life limit for the LPT rotor
stage 3 disk part numbers listed in Table
1 of the proposed AD, and would
require removing these disks from
service at times determined by a
drawdown plan.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 387 CF6–45 and CF6–50
series turbofan engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 8
work-hours to perform the HPT blade
inspection, 6 work-hours to perform a
vibration survey, 4 work-hours to
perform an ultrasonic inspection,
2 work-hours to perform an EGT
resistance check, 1 work-hour to
perform an EGT thermocouple
inspection, and 7 work-hours to clean
and perform an FPI of the LPT rotor
stage 3 disk for each engine. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. The cost
estimate for the work just described was
covered in the two ADs we are
proposing to supersede. For this
proposed AD, we estimate that a
replacement LPT rotor stage 3 disk
prorated part cost is $75,000. Based on
these figures, we estimate the total cost
of this proposed AD to U.S. operators to
be $29,025,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
SECTION 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64845
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2011–02–07, Amendment 39–16580 (76
FR 6323, February 4, 2011) and AD
2011–18–01, Amendment 39–16783 (76
FR 52213, August 22, 2011), and adding
the following new AD:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2010–0068; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NE–05–AD.
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
64846
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by December 5, 2011.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2011–02–07,
Amendment 39–16580 and AD 2011–18–01,
Amendment 39–16783.
(c) Applicability
on the engine data plate as CF6–50C2–F and
CF6–50C2–R, with any of the low-pressure
turbine (LPT) rotor stage 3 disk part numbers
listed in Table 1 of this AD installed.
This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) CF6–45A, CF6–45A2, CF6–
50A, CF6–50C, CF6–50CA, CF6–50C1, CF6–
50C2, CF6–50C2B, CF6–50C2D, CF6–50E,
CF6–50E1, CF6–50E2, and CF6–50–E2D
turbofan engines, including engines marked
TABLE 1—APPLICABLE LPT ROTOR STAGE 3 DISK PART NUMBERS
9061M23P06
9061M23P10
9061M23P12
1479M75P02
1479M75P07
1479M75P14
9061M23P07
1473M90P01
9061M23P14
1479M75P03
1479M75P08
N/A
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by the
determination that a new lower life limit for
the LPT rotor stage 3 disks listed in Table 1
of this AD is necessary. We are issuing this
AD to prevent critical life-limited rotating
engine part failure, which could result in an
uncontained engine failure and damage to
the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
9061M23P08
1473M90P02
9061M23P15
1479M75P04
1479M75P09
N/A
9061M23P09
1473M90P03
9061M23P16
1479M75P05
1479M75P11
N/A
(f) Borescope Inspections of HPT Rotor Stage
1 and Stage 2 Blades
For the borescope inspections required by
paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD,
inspect the blades from the forward and aft
directions. Inspect all areas of the blade
airfoil. Your inspection must include blade
leading and trailing edges, and their convex
and concave airfoil surfaces. Inspect for signs
of impact, cracking, burning, damage, or
distress.
(1) Perform an initial borescope inspection
of the HPT rotor stage 1 and stage 2 blades,
9224M75P01
1473M90P04
1479M75P01
1479M75P06
1479M75P13
N/A
within 10 cycles after the effective date of
this AD.
(2) Thereafter, repeat the borescope
inspection of the HPT rotor stage 1 and stage
2 blades within every 75 cycles-since-lastinspection (CSLI).
(3) Borescope-inspect the HPT rotor stage
1 and stage 2 blades within the cycle limits
after the engine has experienced any of the
events specified in Table 2 of this AD.
(4) Remove any engine from service before
further flight if the engine fails any of the
borescope inspections required by this AD.
TABLE 2—CONDITIONAL BORESCOPE INSPECTION CRITERIA
If the engine has
experienced:
Then borescope-inspect:
(i) An exhaust gas temperature (EGT) above redline.
(ii) A shift in the smoothed EGT trending data that exceeds 18 °F (10 °C), but is less than or equal to 36 °F (20
°C).
(iii) A shift in the smoothed EGT trending data that exceeds 36 °F (20 °C).
(iv) Two consecutive raw EGT trend data points that exceed 18 °F (10 °C) above the smoothed average, but is
less than or equal to 36 °F (20 °C).
(v) Two consecutive raw EGT trend data points that exceed 36 °F (20 °C) above the smoothed average.
Within 10 cycles.
Within 10 cycles.
(g) Actions Required for Engines With
Damaged HPT Rotor Blades
turbine mid-frame liner does not contact the
EGT thermocouple probe.
For those engines that fail any borescope
inspection requirements of this AD, before
returning the engine to service:
(1) Remove the LPT rotor stage 3 disk from
service; or
(2) Perform a fluorescent-penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the inner diameter surface
forward cone body (forward spacer arm) of
the LPT rotor stage 3 disk as specified in
paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through (l)(1)(iii) of this
AD.
(i) EGT System Resistance Check Inspections
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) EGT Thermocouple Probe Inspections
(1) Inspect the EGT thermocouple probe for
damage within 50 cycles after the effective
date of this AD or before accumulating 750
CSLI, whichever occurs later.
(2) Thereafter, re-inspect the EGT
thermocouple probe for damage within every
750 CSLI.
(3) If any EGT thermocouple probe shows
wear through the thermocouple guide sleeve,
remove and replace the EGT thermocouple
probe before further flight, and ensure the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 226001
(1) Perform an EGT system resistance
check within 50 cycles from the effective
date of this AD or before accumulating 750
cycles-since-the-last-resistance check on the
EGT system, whichever occurs later.
(2) Thereafter, repeat the EGT system
resistance check within every 750 cyclessince-the-last-resistance check.
(3) Remove and replace, or repair any EGT
system component that fails the resistance
system check before further flight.
(j) Ultrasonic Inspection (UI) of the LPT
Rotor Stage 3 Disk Forward Spacer Arm
Within 75 cycles after the effective date of
this AD, perform a UI of the forward cone
body (forward spacer arm) of the LPT rotor
stage 3 disk. Use paragraphs E. through K. of
Appendix A of GE Service Bulletin (SB) No.
CF6–50–SB 72–1312, Revision 1, dated
October 18, 2010, to do the UI.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Before further flight.
Within 10 cycles.
Before further flight.
(k) Engine Core Vibration Survey
(1) Within 75 cycles after the effective date
of this AD, perform an initial engine core
vibration survey.
(2) Use about a one-minute acceleration
and a one-minute deceleration of the engine
between ground idle and 84% N2 (about
8,250 rpm) to perform the engine core
vibration survey.
(3) Use a spectral/trim balance analyzer or
equivalent to measure the N2 rotor vibration.
(4) If the vibration level is above 5 mils
Double Amplitude then, before further flight,
remove the engine from service.
(5) For those engines that fail any engine
core vibration survey requirements of this
AD, then before returning the engine to
service:
(i) Remove the LPT rotor stage 3 disk from
service; or
(ii) Perform an FPI of the inner diameter
surface forward cone body (forward spacer
arm) of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk as specified
in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through (l)(1)(iii) of this
AD.
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(6) Thereafter, within every 350 cyclessince-the-last-engine core vibration survey,
perform the engine core vibration survey as
required in paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(5) of
this AD.
(7) If the engine has experienced any
vibration reported by maintenance or flight
crew that is suspected to be caused by the
engine core (N2), perform the engine core
vibration survey as required in paragraphs
(k)(1) through (k)(5) of this AD within 10
cycles after the report.
(l) Initial and Repetitive FPI of LPT Rotor
Stage 3 Disks
(1) At the next shop visit after the effective
date of this AD:
(i) Clean the LPT rotor stage 3 disk forward
spacer arm, including the use of a wetabrasive blast to eliminate residual or
background fluorescence.
(ii) Perform an FPI of the LPT rotor stage
3 disk forward spacer arm for cracks and for
a band of fluorescence. Include all areas of
the disk forward spacer arm and the inner
diameter surface forward cone body (forward
spacer arm) of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk.
(iii) Remove the disk from service before
further flight if a crack or a band of
fluorescence is present.
(2) Thereafter, clean and perform an FPI of
the LPT rotor stage 3 disk forward spacer
arm, as specified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i)
through (l)(1)(iii) of this AD, at each engine
shop visit that occurs after 1,000 cyclessince-the last FPI of the LPT rotor stage 3
disk forward spacer arm.
(m) Removal of LPT Rotor Stage 3 Disks
Remove LPT rotor stage 3 disks listed in
Table 1 from service as follows:
(1) For disks that have fewer than 3,200
flight cycles since new (CSN) on the effective
date of this AD, remove the disk from service
before exceeding 6,200 CSN.
(2) For disks that have 3,200 CSN or more
on the effective date of this AD, do the
following:
(i) If the engine has a shop visit before the
disk exceeds 6,200 CSN, remove the disk
from service before exceeding 6,200 CSN.
(ii) If the engine does not have a shop visit
before the disk exceeds 6,200 CSN, remove
the disk from service at the next shop visit
after 6,200 CSN, not to exceed 3,000 cycles
from the effective date of this AD.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(n) Installation Prohibition
(1) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install or reinstall in any engine any LPT
rotor stage 3 disk that exceeds the new life
limit of 6,200 CSN.
(2) Remove from service any LPT rotor
stage 3 disk that is installed or re-installed
after the effective date of this AD, before the
disk exceeds the new life limit of 6,200 CSN.
(o) Definitions
(1) For the purposes of this AD, an EGT
above redline is a confirmed overtemperature indication that is not a result of
EGT system error.
(2) For the purposes of this AD, a shift in
the smoothed EGT trending data is a shift in
a rolling average of EGT readings that can be
confirmed by a corresponding shift in the
trending of fuel flow or fan speed/core speed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 226001
(N1/N2) relationship. You can find further
guidance about evaluating EGT trend data in
GE Company Service Rep Tip 373
’’Guidelines For Parameter Trend
Monitoring.’’
(3) For the purposes of this AD, an engine
shop visit is the induction of an engine into
the shop after the effective date of this AD,
where the separation of a major engine flange
occurs; except the following maintenance
actions, or any combination, are not
considered engine shop visits:
(i) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for removal of the compressor top or
bottom case for airfoil maintenance or
variable stator vane bushing replacement.
(ii) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for removal or replacement of the stage
1 fan disk.
(iii) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the turbine rear
frame.
(iv) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the accessory
gearbox or transfer gearbox, or both.
(v) Introduction of an engine into a shop
solely for replacement of the fan forward
case.
(p) Previous Credit
(1) A borescope inspection performed
before the effective date of this AD using AD
2010–06–15, Amendment 39–16240 (75 FR
12661, March 17, 2010) or AD 2010–12–10,
Amendment 39–16331 (75 FR 32649, June 9,
2010) or AD 2011–02–07, Amendment 39–
16580 (76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011) within
the last 75 cycles, satisfies the initial
borescope inspection requirement in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(2) A UI performed before the effective date
of this AD using AD 2011–02–07,
Amendment 39–16580 (76 FR 6323, February
4, 2011) or GE SB No. CF6–50–SB 72–1312,
dated August 9, 2010 or GE SB No. CF6–50–
SB 72–1312 Revision 1, dated October 18,
2010, satisfies the inspection requirement in
paragraph (j) of this AD.
(3) An engine core vibration survey
performed before the effective date of this AD
using AD 2011–02–07, Amendment 39–
16580 (76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011) or GE
SB No. CF6–50–SB 72–1313, dated August 9,
2010 or GE SB No. CF6–50–SB 72–1313
Revision 1, dated October 18, 2010, within
the last 350 cycles, satisfies the initial survey
requirement in paragraphs (k)(1) through
(k)(5) of this AD.
(4) An FPI of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk
forward spacer arm performed before the
effective date of this AD using AD 2011–18–
01, Amendment 39–16783 (75 FR 3, 52213,
August 22, 2011), within the last 1,000 flight
cycles of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk, satisfies
the initial inspection requirements in
paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through (l)(1)(iii) of this
AD.
(q) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) AMOCs previously approved for AD
2010–06–15, Amendment 39–16240 (75 FR
12661, March 17, 2010) are not approved for
this AD. However, AMOCs previously
approved for AD 2010–12–10, Amendment
39–16331 (75 FR 32649, June 9, 2010), AD
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64847
2011–02–07, Amendment 39–16580 (76 FR
6323, February 4, 2011), or AD 2011–18–01,
Amendment 39–16783 (76 FR 52213, August
22, 2011) are approved for this AD.
(2) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, may approve alternative methods of
compliance for this AD. Use the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request.
(r) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Tomasz Rakowski, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7735; fax: 781–238–
7199; e-mail: tomasz.rakowski@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact General Electric Company,
GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215, phone: 513–552–3272;
e-mail: geae.aoc@ge.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
October 13, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–27006 Filed 10–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1090; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–138–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model DHC–8–400 Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
One case of the inability to open the
airstair door while on ground was reported
in service. The airstair door seal did not
deflate, preventing the airstair door from
opening. It was found that the existing
airstair door pneumatic shut-off valve control
logic prevents the airstair door seal from
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64844-64847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27006]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0068; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-05-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede two existing airworthiness directives
(ADs) that apply to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-45 and CF6-50
series turbofan engines with certain low-pressure turbine (LPT) rotor
stage 3 disks installed. The existing ADs currently require inspections
of high pressure turbine (HPT) and LPT rotors, engine checks, and
surveys. Since we issued those ADs, GE has determined that the low-
cycle fatigue (LCF) lives of the LPT rotor stage 3 disks affected by
those ADs are below the current published engine manual life limits and
has introduced a new LPT rotor stage 3 disk part number. This proposed
AD would establish a new lower life limit for the LPT rotor stage 3
disks. We are proposing this AD to prevent critical life-limited
rotating engine part failure, which could result in an uncontained
engine failure and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 5,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact General
Electric Company, GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH
45215, phone: 513-552-3272; e-mail: geae.aoc@ge.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tomasz Rakowski, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7735;
fax: 781-238-7199; e-mail: tomasz.rakowski@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0068;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-05-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
[[Page 64845]]
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On January 14, 2011, we issued AD 2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580
(76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011), for GE CF6-45 and CF6-50 series
turbofan engines with certain LPT rotor stage 3 disks installed. That
AD requires initial and repetitive HPT rotor stage 1 and stage 2 blade
inspections for wear and damage, including excessive airfoil material
loss, and initial and repetitive exhaust gas temperature (EGT) system
checks (inspections). That AD also requires a one-time ultrasonic
inspection (UI) of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk forward spacer arm,
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk
under certain conditions, and removal of cracked disks from service
before further flight. That AD also requires initial and repetitive
engine core vibration surveys and reporting to the FAA any crack
findings, disks that fail the UI, and engines that fail the engine core
vibration survey. That AD resulted from reports received of additional
causes of HPT rotor imbalance not addressed in AD 2010-12-10, Amendment
39-16331 (75 FR 32649, June 9, 2010), and from two additional LPT rotor
stage 3 disk events since the original AD 2010-06-15, Amendment 39-
16240 (75 FR 12661, March 17, 2010) was issued.
On August 15, 2011, we issued AD 2011-18-01, Amendment 39-16783 (76
FR 52213, August 22, 2011) to require performing an FPI of the LPT
rotor stage 3 disk forward spacer arm at every shop visit when the LPT
module assembly is separated from the engine. That AD resulted from
seven reports of uncontained failures of LPT rotor stage 3 disks and
eight reports of cracked LPT rotor stage 3 disks found during shop
visit inspections.
We issued those ADs to prevent critical life-limited rotating
engine part failure, which could result in an uncontained engine
failure and damage to the airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580 (76 FR 6323,
February 4, 2011), GE has determined that the LCF lives of the LPT
rotor stage 3 disks affected by that AD were below the current
published manual life limits, and has introduced a new LPT rotor stage
3 disk part number. Moreover, we no longer require the reporting of
inspection findings to the FAA.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD 2011-02-07
Amendment 39-16580 (76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011), and AD 2011-18-01,
Amendment 39-16783 (76 FR 52213, August 22, 2011), except that
reporting to the FAA would no longer be required and there would be an
optional LPT rotor stage 3 disk removal after a failed HPT blade
borescope inspection or a failed engine core vibration survey. This
proposed AD would also establish a new lower life limit for the LPT
rotor stage 3 disk part numbers listed in Table 1 of the proposed AD,
and would require removing these disks from service at times determined
by a drawdown plan.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 387 CF6-45 and CF6-
50 series turbofan engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it would take about 8 work-hours to perform the HPT
blade inspection, 6 work-hours to perform a vibration survey, 4 work-
hours to perform an ultrasonic inspection, 2 work-hours to perform an
EGT resistance check, 1 work-hour to perform an EGT thermocouple
inspection, and 7 work-hours to clean and perform an FPI of the LPT
rotor stage 3 disk for each engine. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. The cost estimate for the work just described was covered in
the two ADs we are proposing to supersede. For this proposed AD, we
estimate that a replacement LPT rotor stage 3 disk prorated part cost
is $75,000. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of this
proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $29,025,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, SECTION 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive
(AD) 2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580 (76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011) and
AD 2011-18-01, Amendment 39-16783 (76 FR 52213, August 22, 2011), and
adding the following new AD:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-0068; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NE-05-AD.
[[Page 64846]]
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by December 5,
2011.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580 and AD
2011-18-01, Amendment 39-16783.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-45A, CF6-
45A2, CF6-50A, CF6-50C, CF6-50CA, CF6-50C1, CF6-50C2, CF6-50C2B,
CF6-50C2D, CF6-50E, CF6-50E1, CF6-50E2, and CF6-50-E2D turbofan
engines, including engines marked on the engine data plate as CF6-
50C2-F and CF6-50C2-R, with any of the low-pressure turbine (LPT)
rotor stage 3 disk part numbers listed in Table 1 of this AD
installed.
Table 1--Applicable LPT Rotor Stage 3 Disk Part Numbers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9061M23P06 9061M23P07 9061M23P08 9061M23P09 9224M75P01
9061M23P10 1473M90P01 1473M90P02 1473M90P03 1473M90P04
9061M23P12 9061M23P14 9061M23P15 9061M23P16 1479M75P01
1479M75P02 1479M75P03 1479M75P04 1479M75P05 1479M75P06
1479M75P07 1479M75P08 1479M75P09 1479M75P11 1479M75P13
1479M75P14 N/A N/A N/A N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by the determination that a new lower life
limit for the LPT rotor stage 3 disks listed in Table 1 of this AD
is necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent critical life-
limited rotating engine part failure, which could result in an
uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(f) Borescope Inspections of HPT Rotor Stage 1 and Stage 2 Blades
For the borescope inspections required by paragraphs (f)(1),
(f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD, inspect the blades from the forward
and aft directions. Inspect all areas of the blade airfoil. Your
inspection must include blade leading and trailing edges, and their
convex and concave airfoil surfaces. Inspect for signs of impact,
cracking, burning, damage, or distress.
(1) Perform an initial borescope inspection of the HPT rotor
stage 1 and stage 2 blades, within 10 cycles after the effective
date of this AD.
(2) Thereafter, repeat the borescope inspection of the HPT rotor
stage 1 and stage 2 blades within every 75 cycles-since-last-
inspection (CSLI).
(3) Borescope-inspect the HPT rotor stage 1 and stage 2 blades
within the cycle limits after the engine has experienced any of the
events specified in Table 2 of this AD.
(4) Remove any engine from service before further flight if the
engine fails any of the borescope inspections required by this AD.
Table 2--Conditional Borescope Inspection Criteria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the engine has experienced: Then borescope-inspect:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) An exhaust gas temperature Within 10 cycles.
(EGT) above redline.
(ii) A shift in the smoothed EGT Within 10 cycles.
trending data that exceeds 18
[deg]F (10 [deg]C), but is less
than or equal to 36 [deg]F (20
[deg]C).
(iii) A shift in the smoothed EGT Before further flight.
trending data that exceeds 36
[deg]F (20 [deg]C).
(iv) Two consecutive raw EGT trend Within 10 cycles.
data points that exceed 18 [deg]F
(10 [deg]C) above the smoothed
average, but is less than or
equal to 36 [deg]F (20 [deg]C).
(v) Two consecutive raw EGT trend Before further flight.
data points that exceed 36 [deg]F
(20 [deg]C) above the smoothed
average.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) Actions Required for Engines With Damaged HPT Rotor Blades
For those engines that fail any borescope inspection
requirements of this AD, before returning the engine to service:
(1) Remove the LPT rotor stage 3 disk from service; or
(2) Perform a fluorescent-penetrant inspection (FPI) of the
inner diameter surface forward cone body (forward spacer arm) of the
LPT rotor stage 3 disk as specified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through
(l)(1)(iii) of this AD.
(h) EGT Thermocouple Probe Inspections
(1) Inspect the EGT thermocouple probe for damage within 50
cycles after the effective date of this AD or before accumulating
750 CSLI, whichever occurs later.
(2) Thereafter, re-inspect the EGT thermocouple probe for damage
within every 750 CSLI.
(3) If any EGT thermocouple probe shows wear through the
thermocouple guide sleeve, remove and replace the EGT thermocouple
probe before further flight, and ensure the turbine mid-frame liner
does not contact the EGT thermocouple probe.
(i) EGT System Resistance Check Inspections
(1) Perform an EGT system resistance check within 50 cycles from
the effective date of this AD or before accumulating 750 cycles-
since-the-last-resistance check on the EGT system, whichever occurs
later.
(2) Thereafter, repeat the EGT system resistance check within
every 750 cycles-since-the-last-resistance check.
(3) Remove and replace, or repair any EGT system component that
fails the resistance system check before further flight.
(j) Ultrasonic Inspection (UI) of the LPT Rotor Stage 3 Disk Forward
Spacer Arm
Within 75 cycles after the effective date of this AD, perform a
UI of the forward cone body (forward spacer arm) of the LPT rotor
stage 3 disk. Use paragraphs E. through K. of Appendix A of GE
Service Bulletin (SB) No. CF6-50-SB 72-1312, Revision 1, dated
October 18, 2010, to do the UI.
(k) Engine Core Vibration Survey
(1) Within 75 cycles after the effective date of this AD,
perform an initial engine core vibration survey.
(2) Use about a one-minute acceleration and a one-minute
deceleration of the engine between ground idle and 84% N2 (about
8,250 rpm) to perform the engine core vibration survey.
(3) Use a spectral/trim balance analyzer or equivalent to
measure the N2 rotor vibration.
(4) If the vibration level is above 5 mils Double Amplitude
then, before further flight, remove the engine from service.
(5) For those engines that fail any engine core vibration survey
requirements of this AD, then before returning the engine to
service:
(i) Remove the LPT rotor stage 3 disk from service; or
(ii) Perform an FPI of the inner diameter surface forward cone
body (forward spacer arm) of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk as specified
in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through (l)(1)(iii) of this AD.
[[Page 64847]]
(6) Thereafter, within every 350 cycles-since-the-last-engine
core vibration survey, perform the engine core vibration survey as
required in paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(5) of this AD.
(7) If the engine has experienced any vibration reported by
maintenance or flight crew that is suspected to be caused by the
engine core (N2), perform the engine core vibration survey as
required in paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(5) of this AD within 10
cycles after the report.
(l) Initial and Repetitive FPI of LPT Rotor Stage 3 Disks
(1) At the next shop visit after the effective date of this AD:
(i) Clean the LPT rotor stage 3 disk forward spacer arm,
including the use of a wet-abrasive blast to eliminate residual or
background fluorescence.
(ii) Perform an FPI of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk forward spacer
arm for cracks and for a band of fluorescence. Include all areas of
the disk forward spacer arm and the inner diameter surface forward
cone body (forward spacer arm) of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk.
(iii) Remove the disk from service before further flight if a
crack or a band of fluorescence is present.
(2) Thereafter, clean and perform an FPI of the LPT rotor stage
3 disk forward spacer arm, as specified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i)
through (l)(1)(iii) of this AD, at each engine shop visit that
occurs after 1,000 cycles-since-the last FPI of the LPT rotor stage
3 disk forward spacer arm.
(m) Removal of LPT Rotor Stage 3 Disks
Remove LPT rotor stage 3 disks listed in Table 1 from service as
follows:
(1) For disks that have fewer than 3,200 flight cycles since new
(CSN) on the effective date of this AD, remove the disk from service
before exceeding 6,200 CSN.
(2) For disks that have 3,200 CSN or more on the effective date
of this AD, do the following:
(i) If the engine has a shop visit before the disk exceeds 6,200
CSN, remove the disk from service before exceeding 6,200 CSN.
(ii) If the engine does not have a shop visit before the disk
exceeds 6,200 CSN, remove the disk from service at the next shop
visit after 6,200 CSN, not to exceed 3,000 cycles from the effective
date of this AD.
(n) Installation Prohibition
(1) After the effective date of this AD, do not install or
reinstall in any engine any LPT rotor stage 3 disk that exceeds the
new life limit of 6,200 CSN.
(2) Remove from service any LPT rotor stage 3 disk that is
installed or re-installed after the effective date of this AD,
before the disk exceeds the new life limit of 6,200 CSN.
(o) Definitions
(1) For the purposes of this AD, an EGT above redline is a
confirmed over-temperature indication that is not a result of EGT
system error.
(2) For the purposes of this AD, a shift in the smoothed EGT
trending data is a shift in a rolling average of EGT readings that
can be confirmed by a corresponding shift in the trending of fuel
flow or fan speed/core speed (N1/N2) relationship. You can find
further guidance about evaluating EGT trend data in GE Company
Service Rep Tip 373 ''Guidelines For Parameter Trend Monitoring.''
(3) For the purposes of this AD, an engine shop visit is the
induction of an engine into the shop after the effective date of
this AD, where the separation of a major engine flange occurs;
except the following maintenance actions, or any combination, are
not considered engine shop visits:
(i) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for removal of
the compressor top or bottom case for airfoil maintenance or
variable stator vane bushing replacement.
(ii) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for removal or
replacement of the stage 1 fan disk.
(iii) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for
replacement of the turbine rear frame.
(iv) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for
replacement of the accessory gearbox or transfer gearbox, or both.
(v) Introduction of an engine into a shop solely for replacement
of the fan forward case.
(p) Previous Credit
(1) A borescope inspection performed before the effective date
of this AD using AD 2010-06-15, Amendment 39-16240 (75 FR 12661,
March 17, 2010) or AD 2010-12-10, Amendment 39-16331 (75 FR 32649,
June 9, 2010) or AD 2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580 (76 FR 6323,
February 4, 2011) within the last 75 cycles, satisfies the initial
borescope inspection requirement in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(2) A UI performed before the effective date of this AD using AD
2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580 (76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011) or GE
SB No. CF6-50-SB 72-1312, dated August 9, 2010 or GE SB No. CF6-50-
SB 72-1312 Revision 1, dated October 18, 2010, satisfies the
inspection requirement in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(3) An engine core vibration survey performed before the
effective date of this AD using AD 2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580
(76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011) or GE SB No. CF6-50-SB 72-1313, dated
August 9, 2010 or GE SB No. CF6-50-SB 72-1313 Revision 1, dated
October 18, 2010, within the last 350 cycles, satisfies the initial
survey requirement in paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(5) of this AD.
(4) An FPI of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk forward spacer arm
performed before the effective date of this AD using AD 2011-18-01,
Amendment 39-16783 (75 FR 3, 52213, August 22, 2011), within the
last 1,000 flight cycles of the LPT rotor stage 3 disk, satisfies
the initial inspection requirements in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through
(l)(1)(iii) of this AD.
(q) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) AMOCs previously approved for AD 2010-06-15, Amendment 39-
16240 (75 FR 12661, March 17, 2010) are not approved for this AD.
However, AMOCs previously approved for AD 2010-12-10, Amendment 39-
16331 (75 FR 32649, June 9, 2010), AD 2011-02-07, Amendment 39-16580
(76 FR 6323, February 4, 2011), or AD 2011-18-01, Amendment 39-16783
(76 FR 52213, August 22, 2011) are approved for this AD.
(2) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve
alternative methods of compliance for this AD. Use the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request.
(r) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Tomasz Rakowski,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781-238-7735; fax: 781-238-7199; e-mail:
tomasz.rakowski@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
General Electric Company, GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
Cincinnati, OH 45215, phone: 513-552-3272; e-mail: geae.aoc@ge.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on October 13, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-27006 Filed 10-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P