Safety Zone; Mainardi/Kinsey Wedding Fireworks, Lake Erie, Lakewood, OH, 64820-64822 [2011-26989]
Download as PDF
64820
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone and is therefore categorically
excluded under paragraph 34(g) of the
Instruction.
A final environmental analysis
checklist and categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
15:51 Oct 18, 2011
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0961 to read as
follows:
■
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Jkt 223001
§ 165.T09–0961 Safety Zone; TrumanHobbs alteration of the Elgin Joliet &
Eastern Railroad Drawbridge, Morris,
Illinois.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all U.S. navigable waters of
the Illinois River in the vicinity of the
Elgin Joliet & Eastern Railroad
Drawbridge between Mile Marker 270.1
and Mile Marker 271.5 of the Illinois
River in Morris, IL. [DATUM: NAD 83].
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This rule is effective and will be
enforced from 7 a.m. on October 13,
2011 until 7 a.m. on November 16, 2011.
If the alteration project is completed
before November 16, 2011, the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her designated representative, may
suspend the enforcement of this safety
zone.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her
designated representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘designated representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, petty officer, or
District 8 Bridge Branch Member who
has been designated by the Captain of
the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, to act on
his or her behalf. The designated
representative of the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, will be on land
in the vicinity of the safety zone and
will have constant communications
with the involved safety vessels that
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
will be provided by the contracting
company, James McHugh Construction,
and will have communications with a
D8 Bridge Branch representative, who
will be on scene as well.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. The Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her designated
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her designated representative.
Dated: October 5, 2011.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2011–26988 Filed 10–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0848]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Mainardi/Kinsey Wedding
Fireworks, Lake Erie, Lakewood, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
Lake Erie, Lakewood, OH for the
Mainardi/Kinsey Wedding Fireworks.
This temporary zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of Lake
Erie during the Mainardi/Kinsey
Wedding Fireworks on October 22,
2011. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with
a firework display.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30
p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on October 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2011–
0848 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0848 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Lt. Chris F. Mercurio,
Chief Of Waterway Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone
716–843–9343, e-mail
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. The final details
for this fireworks display were not
received in sufficient time for the Coast
Guard to solicit public comments before
the start of the event. Thus, waiting for
a notice and comment period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest because to do so
would inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability
to protect the public and vessels from
the hazards associated with fireworks
displays on navigable waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because
to do so would inhibit the Coast Guard’s
ability to protect the public and vessels
from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays on navigable waters.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background and Purpose
Between 9 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. on
October 22, 2011, a fireworks display
will be held on the waters of Lake Erie
near Lakewood, OH. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo has determined that
fireworks launched in proximity to
watercraft pose a significant risk to the
boating public. Such hazards include
premature detonations, dangerous
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
detonations, dangerous projectiles, and
falling or burning debris that may cause
death, serious bodily injury or property
damage.
Discussion of Rule
Because of the aforementioned
hazards, the Captain of the Port Buffalo
has determined that a temporary safety
zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the setup,
loading, and launching of the Mainardi/
Kinsey wedding fireworks display. The
safety zone will be in effect on October
22, 2011 from 8:30 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. The
safety zone will encompass all waters of
Lake Erie in Lakewood, OH within a 700
foot radius of position 41°29′34″ N and
81°49′39″ W (NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). The safety zone will be enforced
for a relatively short time, vessels may
pass around the zone, and vessels may
still pass through the zone with
permission of the Captain of the Port.
Thus, we conclude that this rule is not
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that during the short time
this zone will be in effect, it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will
not interfere with other agencies, will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients, and will not
raise any novel or legal policy issue.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64821
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of Lake Erie in Lakewood, OH
on October 22, 2011 from 8:30 p.m.
until 9:45 p.m.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because of the
minimal amount of time in which the
safety zone will be enforced. This safety
zone will only be enforced for one hour
and fifteen minutes in a low vessel
traffic area. Plus, vessel traffic can pass
safely around the zone. Before the
effective period, maritime advisories
will be issued, which include a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
64822
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Oct 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction because this
rule involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0848 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0848 Safety zone; Mainardi/
Kinsey Wedding Fireworks, Lake Erie,
Lakewood, OH.
(a) Location. The temporary safety
zone will encompass all U.S. navigable
waters on Lake Erie, Lakewood, OH
within a 700 foot radius of position
41°29′34″ N and 81°49′39″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This rule will be effective and enforced
from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on
October 22, 2011.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port or his on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16. The
on-scene representative of the Captain
of the Port will be aboard either a Coast
Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
(5) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative.
Dated: September 29, 2011.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2011–26989 Filed 10–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\19OCR1.SGM
19OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64820-64822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26989]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0848]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Mainardi/Kinsey Wedding Fireworks, Lake Erie,
Lakewood, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in
Lake Erie, Lakewood, OH for the Mainardi/Kinsey Wedding Fireworks. This
temporary zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Lake
Erie during the Mainardi/Kinsey Wedding Fireworks on October 22, 2011.
This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with a firework display.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on October
22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket USCG-2011-0848 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0848 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also
available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey
[[Page 64821]]
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Lt. Chris F. Mercurio, Chief Of Waterway
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9343, e-
mail SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this fireworks
display were not received in sufficient time for the Coast Guard to
solicit public comments before the start of the event. Thus, waiting
for a notice and comment period to run would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because to do so would inhibit the
Coast Guard's ability to protect the public and vessels from the
hazards associated with fireworks displays on navigable waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because to do so would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect the
public and vessels from the hazards associated with fireworks displays
on navigable waters.
Background and Purpose
Between 9 p.m. and 9:15 p.m. on October 22, 2011, a fireworks
display will be held on the waters of Lake Erie near Lakewood, OH. The
Captain of the Port Buffalo has determined that fireworks launched in
proximity to watercraft pose a significant risk to the boating public.
Such hazards include premature detonations, dangerous detonations,
dangerous projectiles, and falling or burning debris that may cause
death, serious bodily injury or property damage.
Discussion of Rule
Because of the aforementioned hazards, the Captain of the Port
Buffalo has determined that a temporary safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the setup, loading,
and launching of the Mainardi/Kinsey wedding fireworks display. The
safety zone will be in effect on October 22, 2011 from 8:30 p.m. to
9:45 p.m. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake Erie in
Lakewood, OH within a 700 foot radius of position 41[deg]29'34'' N and
81[deg]49'39'' W (NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). The safety zone will be enforced for a relatively short
time, vessels may pass around the zone, and vessels may still pass
through the zone with permission of the Captain of the Port. Thus, we
conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that during the short time this zone will be in effect,
it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with
other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or
loan recipients, and will not raise any novel or legal policy issue.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of Lake Erie in Lakewood, OH on October 22, 2011
from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because of the minimal amount of
time in which the safety zone will be enforced. This safety zone will
only be enforced for one hour and fifteen minutes in a low vessel
traffic area. Plus, vessel traffic can pass safely around the zone.
Before the effective period, maritime advisories will be issued, which
include a Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or
[[Page 64822]]
impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction because this rule involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0848 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0848 Safety zone; Mainardi/Kinsey Wedding Fireworks,
Lake Erie, Lakewood, OH.
(a) Location. The temporary safety zone will encompass all U.S.
navigable waters on Lake Erie, Lakewood, OH within a 700 foot radius of
position 41[deg]29'34'' N and 81[deg]49'39'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. This rule will be effective
and enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 9:45 p.m. on October 22, 2011.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo, or
his on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. The
on-scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard
either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
(5) Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene representative.
Dated: September 29, 2011.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2011-26989 Filed 10-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P