Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 64351-64353 [2011-26929]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2011 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Chapman, Contact Representative, or Theresa Kingsberry, Legal Assistant, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office Bureau of Competition, Room H– 303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326– 3100. By direction of the Commission. Donald S. Clark, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–26796 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6750–01–M GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION [[OMB Control No. 3090–0250; Docket No. 2011–0016; Sequence 3] General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Submission for OMB Review; Zero Burden Information Collection Reports Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, GSA. ACTION: Notice of request for comments regarding a renewal to an existing OMB clearance. AGENCY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection requirement regarding zero burden information collection reports. A notice was published in the Federal Register at 76 FR 38396, on June 30, 2011. No comments were received. Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this collection of information is necessary and whether it will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is accurate and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected. DATES: Submit comments on or before: November 17, 2011. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Lague, Procurement Analyst, Contract Policy Division, at telephone (202) 694–8149 or via e-mail to Deborah.lague@gsa.gov. ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 3090–0250, Zero Burden Information Collection Reports, by any of the following methods: • Regulations.gov: https://www. regulations.gov. Submit comments via mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:46 Oct 17, 2011 Jkt 226001 the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting ‘‘Information Collection 3090– 0250, Zero Burden Information Collection Reports’’, under the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search’’. Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds with ‘‘Information Collection 3090–0250, Zero Burden Information Collection Reports’’. Follow the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ‘‘Information Collection 3090–0250, Zero Burden Information Collection Reports’’ on your attached document. • Fax: (202) 501–4067. • Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada Flowers/IC 3090–0250, Zero Burden Information Collection Reports. Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information Collection 3090–0250, Zero Burden Information Collection Reports, in all correspondence related to this collection. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Purpose This information requirement consists of reports that do not impose collection burdens upon the public. These collections require information which is already available to the public at large or that is routinely exchanged by firms during the normal course of business. A general control number for these collections decreases the amount of paperwork generated by the approval process. GSA has published rules in the Federal Register that fall under information collection 3090–0250. The rule that prescribed clause 552.238–70 ‘‘Identification of Electronic Office Equipment Providing Accessibility for the Handicapped’’ was published at 56 FR 29442, June 27, 1991, titled ‘‘Implementation of Public Law 99– 506’’, with an effective date of July 8, 1991; and Clause 552.238–74 ‘‘Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting’’ published at 68 FR 41286, July 11, 2003. B. Annual Reporting Burden None. Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the information collection documents from the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 64351 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20407, telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 3090–0250, Zero Burden Information Collection Reports, in all correspondence. Dated: October 12, 2011. Laura Auletta, Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–26895 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–61–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30-Day–12–11IP] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. Proposed Project Workplace Violence Prevention Programs in NJ Healthcare Facilities— New—National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The long-term goal of the proposed project is to reduce violence against healthcare workers. The objective of the proposed study is two-fold: (1) To examine healthcare facility compliance with the New Jersey Violence Prevention in Health Care Facilities Act, and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of the regulations in this Act in reducing assault injuries to workers. Our central hypothesis is that facilities with high compliance with the regulations will have lower rates of employee violencerelated injury. First, we will conduct face-to-face interviews with the chairs of the Violence Prevention Committees who are in charge of overseeing compliance efforts. The purpose of the interviews is to measure compliance to the state regulations (violence prevention policies, reporting systems E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1 64352 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2011 / Notices for violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and violence prevention training). Second, we will also collect assault injury data from facility violent event reports 3 years preregulation (2009–2011) and 3 years postregulation (2012–2014). The purpose of collecting these data is to evaluate changes in assault injury rates before and after enactment of the regulations. Third, we will conduct a nurse survey. The survey will describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations. Background and Brief Description Healthcare workers are nearly five times more likely to be victims of violence than workers in all industries combined 1. While healthcare workers are not at particularly high risk for jobrelated homicide, nearly 60% of all nonfatal assaults occurring in private industry are experienced in healthcare. Six states have enacted laws to reduce violence against healthcare workers by requiring workplace violence prevention programs 2. However, little is understood about how effective these laws are in reducing violence against healthcare workers. We will test our central hypothesis by accomplishing the following specific aims: 1. Compare the comprehensiveness of healthcare facility workplace violence prevention programs before and after enactment of the New Jersey regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that enactment of the regulations will improve the comprehensiveness of hospital workplace violence prevention program policies, procedures and training. 2. Describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that nurses receive at least 80% of the workplace violence prevention training components mandated in the New Jersey regulations. 3. Examine patterns of assault injuries to workers before and after enactment of the regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that rates of assault injuries to workers will decrease following enactment of the regulations. Healthcare facilities falling under the regulations are eligible for study inclusion (i.e., general acute care hospitals and psychiatric facilities). We will conduct face-to-face interviews with the chairs of the Violence Prevention Committees, who as stated in regulations, are in charge of overseeing compliance efforts. These individuals will include hospital administrators, security directors and/or risk managers, many of whom participated in the California study. The purpose of the interviews is to measure compliance to the state regulations (Aim 1). The interview form was pilot-tested by the study team in the Fall 2010 and includes the following components as mandated in the regulations: violence prevention policies, reporting systems for violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and violence prevention training. Questions will also be asked about barriers and facilitators to developing the violence prevention program. These data will be collected in the post-regulation time period; data collected from New Jersey hospitals in the California study will be used as the baseline measure for evaluating compliance. We will also collect assault injury data from facility violent event reports 3 years pre-regulation (2009–2011) and 3 years post-regulation (2012–2014). The purpose of collecting these data is to evaluate changes in assault injury rates before and after enactment of the regulations (Aim 3). The abstraction form was developed to collect the specific reporting components stated in the regulations: date, time and location of the incident; identity, job title and job task of the victim; identity of the perpetrator; description of the violent act, including whether a weapon was used; description of physical injuries; number of employees in the vicinity when the incident occurred, and their actions in response to the incident; recommendations of police advisors, employees or consultants, and; actions taken by the facility in response to the incident. No employee or perpetrator identifiable information will be collected. In addition to health care facilities, nurses will also be recruited. These nurses will be recruited from a mailing list of nurses licensed from the State of New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs Board of Nursing. The mailing list was selected as the population source of workers due to the ability to capture all licensed nurses in New Jersey. A similar listing does not exist for non-licensed frontline workers, such as aides and orderlies. Therefore, a sampling frame based on nurses (registered nurses and licensed practical nurses) will be used to select workers to participate in the study. A random sample of 2000 registered and licensed practical nurses will be recruited for study participation. A third-party contractor will be responsible for sending the survey to the random sample of 2000. The Health Professionals and Allied Employees union will promote the survey to their members. To maintain the worker’s anonymity, the facility in which he/she works will not be identified. The survey will describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations (Aim 2). There are no costs to the respondents other than their time. The total estimated annual burden hours are 817. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS No. of respondents Form name Hospital Administrators ...................... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Type of respondent Evaluation of Hospital Workplace Violence Prevention Program. Committee Chair Interview ......................................... Employee Incident Information ................................... Healthcare Facility Workplace Violence Prevention Programs Nurse Survey. Hospital Administrators ...................... Hospital Administrators ...................... Nurses (RN and LPN) ........................ VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:46 Oct 17, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM Average burden per response (in hrs) Responses per respondent 50 1 1 50 50 2000 1 1 1 1 1 20/60 18OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2011 / Notices Dated: October 12, 2011. Daniel Holcomb, Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2011–26929 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Docket Number NIOSH–245] Request for Public Comment on Draft Document: ‘‘Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione’’; Extension of Comment Period National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice and extension of public comment period. AGENCY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is extending to November 18, 2011, the comment period for the notice that appeared in the Federal Register of July 25, 2011 (76 FR 44338–44339). In the Notice, NIOSH announced its intent to hold a public meeting to discuss and obtain comments on the draft document, ‘‘Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione’’ with a comment period ending on October 14, 2011. A copy of the draft document was posted on the Internet at: https://www.cdc.gov/ niosh/docket/review/docket245/ for Docket number NIOSH–245. The agency is extending the comment period in response to requests for extensions to permit the public more time to gather and submit information. SUMMARY: Table of Contents • Dates • Addresses • For Further Information Contact Written comments on the document will be accepted until November 18, 2011. ADDRESSES: All material submitted to NIOSH should reference Docket Number NIOSH–245. All electronic comments should be formatted as Microsoft Word or PDF files and make reference to Docket Number NIOSH–245. To submit mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES DATES: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:46 Oct 17, 2011 Jkt 226001 comments, please use one of these options: • Send NIOSH comments using the online form at https://www.cdc.gov/ niosh/docket/review/docket245/ comments.html. • Email: nioshdocket@cdc.gov. • Facsimile: (513) 533–8285. • Mail: NIOSH Docket Office, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C34, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226. All information received in response to this notice will be available for public examination and copying at the NIOSH Docket Office, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Room 111, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. A complete electronic docket containing all comments submitted will be available on the NIOSH docket home page at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ docket/archive/docket245.html and comments will be available in writing by request. NIOSH includes all comments received without change in the docket, including any personal information provided. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauralynn Taylor McKernan, ScD, CIH, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS– C32, Cincinnati, OH 45226, telephone (513) 533–8542, fax (513) 533–8230, Email LMcKernan@cdc.gov. Dated: October 12, 2011. John Howard, Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2011–26870 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–19–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Docket Number NIOSH–247] Buy Quiet Workshop National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will be holding a two-day Buy Quiet Workshop. The Workshop is a National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) activity jointly organized by the NORA Construction Sector and Manufacturing SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 64353 Sector Programs, and the NIOSH Hearing Loss Prevention Cross-sector Program. The purpose of the Workshop is to determine feasibility and functionality of Buy Quiet programs and to explore proactive steps to ensure successful implementation. The Workshop goal is to stimulate the wider adoption of current and future engineering noise controls on machinery and equipment and to motivate the development and implementation of Buy Quiet programs for the Construction and Manufacturing industries. Date and Time: November 9–10, 2011, 8 a.m.–5 p.m., Eastern Standard Time. Place: Robert A. Taft Laboratories, Taft Auditorium, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. ADDRESSES: If interested in attending the meeting, please contact the NIOSH Docket Office at: • Mail: NIOSH Docket Office, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C34, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. • Facsimile: (513) 533–8285. • E-mail: nioshdocket@cdc.gov. • Telephone: (513) 533–8611. Free registration and information on the workshop can be found at https:// www.team-psa.com/BUYQUIET. Security Considerations: Due to mandatory security clearance procedures at the Robert A. Taft Laboratories, in-person attendees must present valid government-issued picture identification to security personnel upon entering the parking lot. Non-U.S. Citizens: Because of CDC Security Regulations, any non-U.S. citizen wishing to attend this meeting must provide the following information in writing to the NIOSH Docket Officer at the address below no later than October 21, 2011: 1. Name: 2. Gender: 3. Date of Birth: 4. Place of birth (city, province, state, country): 5. Citizenship: 6. Passport Number: 7. Date of Passport Issue: 8. Date of Passport Expiration: 9. Type of Visa: 10. U.S. Naturalization Number (if a naturalized citizen): 11. U.S. Naturalization Date (if a naturalized citizen): 12. Visitor’s Organization: 13. Organization Address: 14. Organization Telephone Number: 15. Visitor’s Position/Title within the Organization: This information will be transmitted to the CDC Security Office for approval. E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64351-64353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26929]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[30-Day-12-11IP]


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a 
list of information collection requests under review by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call 
the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-5960 or send an e-mail 
to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of 
Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-
5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this 
notice.

Proposed Project

    Workplace Violence Prevention Programs in NJ Healthcare 
Facilities--New--National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
    The long-term goal of the proposed project is to reduce violence 
against healthcare workers. The objective of the proposed study is two-
fold: (1) To examine healthcare facility compliance with the New Jersey 
Violence Prevention in Health Care Facilities Act, and (2) to evaluate 
the effectiveness of the regulations in this Act in reducing assault 
injuries to workers. Our central hypothesis is that facilities with 
high compliance with the regulations will have lower rates of employee 
violence-related injury. First, we will conduct face-to-face interviews 
with the chairs of the Violence Prevention Committees who are in charge 
of overseeing compliance efforts. The purpose of the interviews is to 
measure compliance to the state regulations (violence prevention 
policies, reporting systems

[[Page 64352]]

for violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence 
prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and 
violence prevention training). Second, we will also collect assault 
injury data from facility violent event reports 3 years pre-regulation 
(2009-2011) and 3 years post-regulation (2012-2014). The purpose of 
collecting these data is to evaluate changes in assault injury rates 
before and after enactment of the regulations. Third, we will conduct a 
nurse survey. The survey will describe the workplace violence 
prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New 
Jersey regulations.

Background and Brief Description

    Healthcare workers are nearly five times more likely to be victims 
of violence than workers in all industries combined \1\. While 
healthcare workers are not at particularly high risk for job-related 
homicide, nearly 60% of all nonfatal assaults occurring in private 
industry are experienced in healthcare. Six states have enacted laws to 
reduce violence against healthcare workers by requiring workplace 
violence prevention programs \2\. However, little is understood about 
how effective these laws are in reducing violence against healthcare 
workers.
    We will test our central hypothesis by accomplishing the following 
specific aims:
    1. Compare the comprehensiveness of healthcare facility workplace 
violence prevention programs before and after enactment of the New 
Jersey regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary 
research, we hypothesize that enactment of the regulations will improve 
the comprehensiveness of hospital workplace violence prevention program 
policies, procedures and training.
    2. Describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses 
receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations; Working 
hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that 
nurses receive at least 80% of the workplace violence prevention 
training components mandated in the New Jersey regulations.
    3. Examine patterns of assault injuries to workers before and after 
enactment of the regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our 
preliminary research, we hypothesize that rates of assault injuries to 
workers will decrease following enactment of the regulations.
    Healthcare facilities falling under the regulations are eligible 
for study inclusion (i.e., general acute care hospitals and psychiatric 
facilities). We will conduct face-to-face interviews with the chairs of 
the Violence Prevention Committees, who as stated in regulations, are 
in charge of overseeing compliance efforts. These individuals will 
include hospital administrators, security directors and/or risk 
managers, many of whom participated in the California study. The 
purpose of the interviews is to measure compliance to the state 
regulations (Aim 1). The interview form was pilot-tested by the study 
team in the Fall 2010 and includes the following components as mandated 
in the regulations: violence prevention policies, reporting systems for 
violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence 
prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and 
violence prevention training. Questions will also be asked about 
barriers and facilitators to developing the violence prevention 
program. These data will be collected in the post-regulation time 
period; data collected from New Jersey hospitals in the California 
study will be used as the baseline measure for evaluating compliance.
    We will also collect assault injury data from facility violent 
event reports 3 years pre-regulation (2009-2011) and 3 years post-
regulation (2012-2014). The purpose of collecting these data is to 
evaluate changes in assault injury rates before and after enactment of 
the regulations (Aim 3). The abstraction form was developed to collect 
the specific reporting components stated in the regulations: date, time 
and location of the incident; identity, job title and job task of the 
victim; identity of the perpetrator; description of the violent act, 
including whether a weapon was used; description of physical injuries; 
number of employees in the vicinity when the incident occurred, and 
their actions in response to the incident; recommendations of police 
advisors, employees or consultants, and; actions taken by the facility 
in response to the incident. No employee or perpetrator identifiable 
information will be collected.
    In addition to health care facilities, nurses will also be 
recruited. These nurses will be recruited from a mailing list of nurses 
licensed from the State of New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs 
Board of Nursing. The mailing list was selected as the population 
source of workers due to the ability to capture all licensed nurses in 
New Jersey. A similar listing does not exist for non-licensed frontline 
workers, such as aides and orderlies. Therefore, a sampling frame based 
on nurses (registered nurses and licensed practical nurses) will be 
used to select workers to participate in the study. A random sample of 
2000 registered and licensed practical nurses will be recruited for 
study participation. A third-party contractor will be responsible for 
sending the survey to the random sample of 2000. The Health 
Professionals and Allied Employees union will promote the survey to 
their members. To maintain the worker's anonymity, the facility in 
which he/she works will not be identified. The survey will describe the 
workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following 
enactment of the New Jersey regulations (Aim 2).
    There are no costs to the respondents other than their time. The 
total estimated annual burden hours are 817.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                  Average burden
         Type of respondent                   Form name               No. of       Responses per   per response
                                                                    respondents     respondent       (in hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital Administrators............  Evaluation of Hospital                   50               1               1
                                      Workplace Violence
                                      Prevention Program.
Hospital Administrators............  Committee Chair Interview..              50               1               1
Hospital Administrators............  Employee Incident                        50               1               1
                                      Information.
Nurses (RN and LPN)................  Healthcare Facility                    2000               1           20/60
                                      Workplace Violence
                                      Prevention Programs Nurse
                                      Survey.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 64353]]

    Dated: October 12, 2011.
Daniel Holcomb,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-26929 Filed 10-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.