Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 64351-64353 [2011-26929]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2011 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Renee Chapman, Contact
Representative, or Theresa Kingsberry,
Legal Assistant, Federal Trade
Commission, Premerger Notification
Office Bureau of Competition, Room H–
303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–
3100.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–26796 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–M
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[[OMB Control No. 3090–0250; Docket No.
2011–0016; Sequence 3]
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation; Submission
for OMB Review; Zero Burden
Information Collection Reports
Office of the Chief Acquisition
Officer, GSA.
ACTION: Notice of request for comments
regarding a renewal to an existing OMB
clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve a reinstatement of a
previously approved information
collection requirement regarding zero
burden information collection reports. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register at 76 FR 38396, on June 30,
2011. No comments were received.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary and whether it
will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate and
based on valid assumptions and
methodology; and ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
DATES: Submit comments on or before:
November 17, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Lague, Procurement Analyst,
Contract Policy Division, at telephone
(202) 694–8149 or via e-mail to
Deborah.lague@gsa.gov.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
3090–0250, Zero Burden Information
Collection Reports, by any of the
following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://www.
regulations.gov. Submit comments via
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Oct 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inputting ‘‘Information Collection 3090–
0250, Zero Burden Information
Collection Reports’’, under the heading
‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and selecting
‘‘Search’’. Select the link ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ that corresponds with
‘‘Information Collection 3090–0250,
Zero Burden Information Collection
Reports’’. Follow the instructions
provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 3090–0250,
Zero Burden Information Collection
Reports’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: (202) 501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada
Flowers/IC 3090–0250, Zero Burden
Information Collection Reports.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
3090–0250, Zero Burden Information
Collection Reports, in all
correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
This information requirement consists
of reports that do not impose collection
burdens upon the public. These
collections require information which is
already available to the public at large
or that is routinely exchanged by firms
during the normal course of business. A
general control number for these
collections decreases the amount of
paperwork generated by the approval
process.
GSA has published rules in the
Federal Register that fall under
information collection 3090–0250. The
rule that prescribed clause 552.238–70
‘‘Identification of Electronic Office
Equipment Providing Accessibility for
the Handicapped’’ was published at 56
FR 29442, June 27, 1991, titled
‘‘Implementation of Public Law 99–
506’’, with an effective date of July 8,
1991; and Clause 552.238–74
‘‘Industrial Funding Fee and Sales
Reporting’’ published at 68 FR 41286,
July 11, 2003.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
None.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64351
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20407,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 3090–0250, Zero
Burden Information Collection Reports,
in all correspondence.
Dated: October 12, 2011.
Laura Auletta,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–26895 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–61–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30-Day–12–11IP]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806.
Written comments should be received
within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Workplace Violence Prevention
Programs in NJ Healthcare Facilities—
New—National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
The long-term goal of the proposed
project is to reduce violence against
healthcare workers. The objective of the
proposed study is two-fold: (1) To
examine healthcare facility compliance
with the New Jersey Violence
Prevention in Health Care Facilities Act,
and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of
the regulations in this Act in reducing
assault injuries to workers. Our central
hypothesis is that facilities with high
compliance with the regulations will
have lower rates of employee violencerelated injury. First, we will conduct
face-to-face interviews with the chairs of
the Violence Prevention Committees
who are in charge of overseeing
compliance efforts. The purpose of the
interviews is to measure compliance to
the state regulations (violence
prevention policies, reporting systems
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
64352
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2011 / Notices
for violent events, violence prevention
committee, written violence prevention
plan, violence risk assessments, post
incident response and violence
prevention training). Second, we will
also collect assault injury data from
facility violent event reports 3 years preregulation (2009–2011) and 3 years postregulation (2012–2014). The purpose of
collecting these data is to evaluate
changes in assault injury rates before
and after enactment of the regulations.
Third, we will conduct a nurse survey.
The survey will describe the workplace
violence prevention training nurses
receive following enactment of the New
Jersey regulations.
Background and Brief Description
Healthcare workers are nearly five
times more likely to be victims of
violence than workers in all industries
combined 1. While healthcare workers
are not at particularly high risk for jobrelated homicide, nearly 60% of all
nonfatal assaults occurring in private
industry are experienced in healthcare.
Six states have enacted laws to reduce
violence against healthcare workers by
requiring workplace violence
prevention programs 2. However, little is
understood about how effective these
laws are in reducing violence against
healthcare workers.
We will test our central hypothesis by
accomplishing the following specific
aims:
1. Compare the comprehensiveness of
healthcare facility workplace violence
prevention programs before and after
enactment of the New Jersey
regulations; Working hypothesis: Based
on our preliminary research, we
hypothesize that enactment of the
regulations will improve the
comprehensiveness of hospital
workplace violence prevention program
policies, procedures and training.
2. Describe the workplace violence
prevention training nurses receive
following enactment of the New Jersey
regulations; Working hypothesis: Based
on our preliminary research, we
hypothesize that nurses receive at least
80% of the workplace violence
prevention training components
mandated in the New Jersey regulations.
3. Examine patterns of assault injuries
to workers before and after enactment of
the regulations; Working hypothesis:
Based on our preliminary research, we
hypothesize that rates of assault injuries
to workers will decrease following
enactment of the regulations.
Healthcare facilities falling under the
regulations are eligible for study
inclusion (i.e., general acute care
hospitals and psychiatric facilities). We
will conduct face-to-face interviews
with the chairs of the Violence
Prevention Committees, who as stated
in regulations, are in charge of
overseeing compliance efforts. These
individuals will include hospital
administrators, security directors and/or
risk managers, many of whom
participated in the California study. The
purpose of the interviews is to measure
compliance to the state regulations (Aim
1). The interview form was pilot-tested
by the study team in the Fall 2010 and
includes the following components as
mandated in the regulations: violence
prevention policies, reporting systems
for violent events, violence prevention
committee, written violence prevention
plan, violence risk assessments, post
incident response and violence
prevention training. Questions will also
be asked about barriers and facilitators
to developing the violence prevention
program. These data will be collected in
the post-regulation time period; data
collected from New Jersey hospitals in
the California study will be used as the
baseline measure for evaluating
compliance.
We will also collect assault injury
data from facility violent event reports
3 years pre-regulation (2009–2011) and
3 years post-regulation (2012–2014).
The purpose of collecting these data is
to evaluate changes in assault injury
rates before and after enactment of the
regulations (Aim 3). The abstraction
form was developed to collect the
specific reporting components stated in
the regulations: date, time and location
of the incident; identity, job title and job
task of the victim; identity of the
perpetrator; description of the violent
act, including whether a weapon was
used; description of physical injuries;
number of employees in the vicinity
when the incident occurred, and their
actions in response to the incident;
recommendations of police advisors,
employees or consultants, and; actions
taken by the facility in response to the
incident. No employee or perpetrator
identifiable information will be
collected.
In addition to health care facilities,
nurses will also be recruited. These
nurses will be recruited from a mailing
list of nurses licensed from the State of
New Jersey Division of Consumer
Affairs Board of Nursing. The mailing
list was selected as the population
source of workers due to the ability to
capture all licensed nurses in New
Jersey. A similar listing does not exist
for non-licensed frontline workers, such
as aides and orderlies. Therefore, a
sampling frame based on nurses
(registered nurses and licensed practical
nurses) will be used to select workers to
participate in the study. A random
sample of 2000 registered and licensed
practical nurses will be recruited for
study participation. A third-party
contractor will be responsible for
sending the survey to the random
sample of 2000. The Health
Professionals and Allied Employees
union will promote the survey to their
members. To maintain the worker’s
anonymity, the facility in which he/she
works will not be identified. The survey
will describe the workplace violence
prevention training nurses receive
following enactment of the New Jersey
regulations (Aim 2).
There are no costs to the respondents
other than their time. The total
estimated annual burden hours are 817.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
No. of
respondents
Form name
Hospital Administrators ......................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Type of respondent
Evaluation of Hospital Workplace Violence Prevention Program.
Committee Chair Interview .........................................
Employee Incident Information ...................................
Healthcare Facility Workplace Violence Prevention
Programs Nurse Survey.
Hospital Administrators ......................
Hospital Administrators ......................
Nurses (RN and LPN) ........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Oct 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs)
Responses
per
respondent
50
1
1
50
50
2000
1
1
1
1
1
20/60
18OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2011 / Notices
Dated: October 12, 2011.
Daniel Holcomb,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011–26929 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[Docket Number NIOSH–245]
Request for Public Comment on Draft
Document: ‘‘Criteria for a
Recommended Standard:
Occupational Exposure to Diacetyl and
2,3-pentanedione’’; Extension of
Comment Period
National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC),
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice and extension of public
comment period.
AGENCY:
The National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) is
extending to November 18, 2011, the
comment period for the notice that
appeared in the Federal Register of July
25, 2011 (76 FR 44338–44339). In the
Notice, NIOSH announced its intent to
hold a public meeting to discuss and
obtain comments on the draft document,
‘‘Criteria for a Recommended Standard:
Occupational Exposure to Diacetyl and
2,3-pentanedione’’ with a comment
period ending on October 14, 2011. A
copy of the draft document was posted
on the Internet at: https://www.cdc.gov/
niosh/docket/review/docket245/ for
Docket number NIOSH–245. The agency
is extending the comment period in
response to requests for extensions to
permit the public more time to gather
and submit information.
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
• Dates
• Addresses
• For Further Information Contact
Written comments on the
document will be accepted until
November 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: All material submitted to
NIOSH should reference Docket Number
NIOSH–245. All electronic comments
should be formatted as Microsoft Word
or PDF files and make reference to
Docket Number NIOSH–245. To submit
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:46 Oct 17, 2011
Jkt 226001
comments, please use one of these
options:
• Send NIOSH comments using the
online form at https://www.cdc.gov/
niosh/docket/review/docket245/
comments.html.
• Email: nioshdocket@cdc.gov.
• Facsimile: (513) 533–8285.
• Mail: NIOSH Docket Office, Robert
A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C34, 4676
Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH
45226.
All information received in response
to this notice will be available for public
examination and copying at the NIOSH
Docket Office, 4676 Columbia Parkway,
Room 111, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. A
complete electronic docket containing
all comments submitted will be
available on the NIOSH docket home
page at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/
docket/archive/docket245.html and
comments will be available in writing
by request. NIOSH includes all
comments received without change in
the docket, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lauralynn Taylor McKernan, ScD, CIH,
NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS–
C32, Cincinnati, OH 45226, telephone
(513) 533–8542, fax (513) 533–8230,
Email LMcKernan@cdc.gov.
Dated: October 12, 2011.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011–26870 Filed 10–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[Docket Number NIOSH–247]
Buy Quiet Workshop
National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC),
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
The National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) will be
holding a two-day Buy Quiet Workshop.
The Workshop is a National
Occupational Research Agenda (NORA)
activity jointly organized by the NORA
Construction Sector and Manufacturing
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64353
Sector Programs, and the NIOSH
Hearing Loss Prevention Cross-sector
Program. The purpose of the Workshop
is to determine feasibility and
functionality of Buy Quiet programs and
to explore proactive steps to ensure
successful implementation. The
Workshop goal is to stimulate the wider
adoption of current and future
engineering noise controls on
machinery and equipment and to
motivate the development and
implementation of Buy Quiet programs
for the Construction and Manufacturing
industries.
Date and Time: November 9–10, 2011,
8 a.m.–5 p.m., Eastern Standard Time.
Place: Robert A. Taft Laboratories,
Taft Auditorium, 4676 Columbia
Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226.
ADDRESSES: If interested in attending the
meeting, please contact the NIOSH
Docket Office at:
• Mail: NIOSH Docket Office, Robert
A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C34, 4676
Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio
45226.
• Facsimile: (513) 533–8285.
• E-mail: nioshdocket@cdc.gov.
• Telephone: (513) 533–8611.
Free registration and information on
the workshop can be found at https://
www.team-psa.com/BUYQUIET.
Security Considerations: Due to
mandatory security clearance
procedures at the Robert A. Taft
Laboratories, in-person attendees must
present valid government-issued picture
identification to security personnel
upon entering the parking lot.
Non-U.S. Citizens: Because of CDC
Security Regulations, any non-U.S.
citizen wishing to attend this meeting
must provide the following information
in writing to the NIOSH Docket Officer
at the address below no later than
October 21, 2011:
1. Name:
2. Gender:
3. Date of Birth:
4. Place of birth (city, province, state,
country):
5. Citizenship:
6. Passport Number:
7. Date of Passport Issue:
8. Date of Passport Expiration:
9. Type of Visa:
10. U.S. Naturalization Number (if a
naturalized citizen):
11. U.S. Naturalization Date (if a
naturalized citizen):
12. Visitor’s Organization:
13. Organization Address:
14. Organization Telephone Number:
15. Visitor’s Position/Title within the
Organization:
This information will be transmitted
to the CDC Security Office for approval.
E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM
18OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64351-64353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26929]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30-Day-12-11IP]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a
list of information collection requests under review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call
the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-5960 or send an e-mail
to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-
5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Workplace Violence Prevention Programs in NJ Healthcare
Facilities--New--National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The long-term goal of the proposed project is to reduce violence
against healthcare workers. The objective of the proposed study is two-
fold: (1) To examine healthcare facility compliance with the New Jersey
Violence Prevention in Health Care Facilities Act, and (2) to evaluate
the effectiveness of the regulations in this Act in reducing assault
injuries to workers. Our central hypothesis is that facilities with
high compliance with the regulations will have lower rates of employee
violence-related injury. First, we will conduct face-to-face interviews
with the chairs of the Violence Prevention Committees who are in charge
of overseeing compliance efforts. The purpose of the interviews is to
measure compliance to the state regulations (violence prevention
policies, reporting systems
[[Page 64352]]
for violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence
prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and
violence prevention training). Second, we will also collect assault
injury data from facility violent event reports 3 years pre-regulation
(2009-2011) and 3 years post-regulation (2012-2014). The purpose of
collecting these data is to evaluate changes in assault injury rates
before and after enactment of the regulations. Third, we will conduct a
nurse survey. The survey will describe the workplace violence
prevention training nurses receive following enactment of the New
Jersey regulations.
Background and Brief Description
Healthcare workers are nearly five times more likely to be victims
of violence than workers in all industries combined \1\. While
healthcare workers are not at particularly high risk for job-related
homicide, nearly 60% of all nonfatal assaults occurring in private
industry are experienced in healthcare. Six states have enacted laws to
reduce violence against healthcare workers by requiring workplace
violence prevention programs \2\. However, little is understood about
how effective these laws are in reducing violence against healthcare
workers.
We will test our central hypothesis by accomplishing the following
specific aims:
1. Compare the comprehensiveness of healthcare facility workplace
violence prevention programs before and after enactment of the New
Jersey regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our preliminary
research, we hypothesize that enactment of the regulations will improve
the comprehensiveness of hospital workplace violence prevention program
policies, procedures and training.
2. Describe the workplace violence prevention training nurses
receive following enactment of the New Jersey regulations; Working
hypothesis: Based on our preliminary research, we hypothesize that
nurses receive at least 80% of the workplace violence prevention
training components mandated in the New Jersey regulations.
3. Examine patterns of assault injuries to workers before and after
enactment of the regulations; Working hypothesis: Based on our
preliminary research, we hypothesize that rates of assault injuries to
workers will decrease following enactment of the regulations.
Healthcare facilities falling under the regulations are eligible
for study inclusion (i.e., general acute care hospitals and psychiatric
facilities). We will conduct face-to-face interviews with the chairs of
the Violence Prevention Committees, who as stated in regulations, are
in charge of overseeing compliance efforts. These individuals will
include hospital administrators, security directors and/or risk
managers, many of whom participated in the California study. The
purpose of the interviews is to measure compliance to the state
regulations (Aim 1). The interview form was pilot-tested by the study
team in the Fall 2010 and includes the following components as mandated
in the regulations: violence prevention policies, reporting systems for
violent events, violence prevention committee, written violence
prevention plan, violence risk assessments, post incident response and
violence prevention training. Questions will also be asked about
barriers and facilitators to developing the violence prevention
program. These data will be collected in the post-regulation time
period; data collected from New Jersey hospitals in the California
study will be used as the baseline measure for evaluating compliance.
We will also collect assault injury data from facility violent
event reports 3 years pre-regulation (2009-2011) and 3 years post-
regulation (2012-2014). The purpose of collecting these data is to
evaluate changes in assault injury rates before and after enactment of
the regulations (Aim 3). The abstraction form was developed to collect
the specific reporting components stated in the regulations: date, time
and location of the incident; identity, job title and job task of the
victim; identity of the perpetrator; description of the violent act,
including whether a weapon was used; description of physical injuries;
number of employees in the vicinity when the incident occurred, and
their actions in response to the incident; recommendations of police
advisors, employees or consultants, and; actions taken by the facility
in response to the incident. No employee or perpetrator identifiable
information will be collected.
In addition to health care facilities, nurses will also be
recruited. These nurses will be recruited from a mailing list of nurses
licensed from the State of New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs
Board of Nursing. The mailing list was selected as the population
source of workers due to the ability to capture all licensed nurses in
New Jersey. A similar listing does not exist for non-licensed frontline
workers, such as aides and orderlies. Therefore, a sampling frame based
on nurses (registered nurses and licensed practical nurses) will be
used to select workers to participate in the study. A random sample of
2000 registered and licensed practical nurses will be recruited for
study participation. A third-party contractor will be responsible for
sending the survey to the random sample of 2000. The Health
Professionals and Allied Employees union will promote the survey to
their members. To maintain the worker's anonymity, the facility in
which he/she works will not be identified. The survey will describe the
workplace violence prevention training nurses receive following
enactment of the New Jersey regulations (Aim 2).
There are no costs to the respondents other than their time. The
total estimated annual burden hours are 817.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Type of respondent Form name No. of Responses per per response
respondents respondent (in hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital Administrators............ Evaluation of Hospital 50 1 1
Workplace Violence
Prevention Program.
Hospital Administrators............ Committee Chair Interview.. 50 1 1
Hospital Administrators............ Employee Incident 50 1 1
Information.
Nurses (RN and LPN)................ Healthcare Facility 2000 1 20/60
Workplace Violence
Prevention Programs Nurse
Survey.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 64353]]
Dated: October 12, 2011.
Daniel Holcomb,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-26929 Filed 10-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P