Request for Comments on Intellectual Property Enforcement in China, 64075-64076 [2011-26757]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2011 / Notices
Located in
the northwestern Gulf of Mexico, the
Flower Garden Banks National Marine
Sanctuary includes three separate areas,
known as East Flower Garden, West
Flower Garden, and Stetson Banks. The
Sanctuary was designated on January
17, 1992. Stetson Bank was added to the
Sanctuary in 1996. The Sanctuary
Advisory Council will consist of no
more than 21 members; 16
nongovernmental voting members and 5
governmental non-voting members. The
Council may serve as a forum for
consultation and deliberation among its
members and as a source of advice to
the Sanctuary manager regarding the
management of the Flower Garden
Banks National Marine Sanctuary.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. Sections 1431, et
seq.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program)
Dated: October 4, 2011.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–26685 Filed 10–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
Membership of the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration’s Performance Review
Board
National Telecommunications
and Information Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Membership on the
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration’s
Performance Review Board
Membership.
AGENCY:
In accordance with 5 U.S. C.
4314 (c)(4), the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA), Department of
Commerce (DOC), announce the
appointment of those individuals who
have been selected to serve as members
of NTIA’s Performance Review Board.
The Performance Review Board is
responsible for (1) reviewing
performance appraisals and rating of
Senior Executive Service (SES) members
and (2) making recommendations to the
appointing authority on other
performance management issues, such
as pay adjustments, bonuses and
Presidential Rank Awards for SES
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Oct 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
members. The appointment of these
members to the Performance Review
Board will be for a period of twenty-four
(24) months.
The period of appointment for
those individuals selected for NTIA’s
Performance Review Board begins on
October 17, 2011.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruthie B. Stewart, Department of
Commerce Human Resources
Operations Center (DOCHROC), Office
of Staffing, Recruitment, and
Classification/Executive Resources
Operations, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room 7419, Washington,
DC 20230, at (202) 482–3130.
In
accordance with 5 U.S. C. 4314 (c)(4),
the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA),
Department of Commerce (DOC),
announce the appointment of those
individuals who have been selected to
serve as members of NTIA’s
Performance Review Board. The
Performance Review Board is
responsible for (1) reviewing
performance appraisals and rating of
Senior Executive Service (SES) members
and (2) making recommendations to the
appointing authority on other
performance management issues, such
as pay adjustments, bonuses and
Presidential Rank Awards for SES
members. The appointment of these
members to the Performance Review
Board will be for a period of twenty-four
(24) months.
DATES: The period of appointment for
those individuals selected for NTIA’s
Performance Review Board begins on
October 17, 2011. The name, position
title, and type of appointment of each
member of NTIA’s Performance Review
Board are set forth below by
organization:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration (ITA)
Renee A. Macklin, Chief Information Officer,
ITA, Career SES.
Department of Commerce, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration
Leonard M. Bechtel, Chief Financial Officer
and Director of Administration, Career
SES, Chairperson, (New Member).
Bernadette A. McGuire-Rivera, Associate
Administrator for Telecommunications and
Information Applications, Career SES.
Karl B. Nebbia, Associate Administrator for
Spectrum Management, Career SES.
Alan W. Vincent, Associate Administrator for
Telecom Sciences and Director Institute for
Telecom Sciences, Career SES.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64075
Dated: October 11, 2011.
Susan Boggs,
Director, Office of Staffing, Recruitment and
Classification, Department of Commerce
Human Resources Operations Center.
[FR Doc. 2011–26736 Filed 10–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No. PTO–C–2011–0056]
Request for Comments on Intellectual
Property Enforcement in China
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Request for written submissions
from the public.
AGENCY:
As China has become a major
trading partner for the United States,
U.S. rights holders are increasingly
seeking to protect and enforce their
intellectual property (IP) in that
country. China’s patent and trademark
offices are now among the largest in the
world in terms of filings, and its IP
enforcement system is being
increasingly utilized by U.S. rights
holders. Ensuring that the Chinese IP
system works in a fair and timely
manner for U.S. innovators is a top
priority for the U.S. Government.
To that end, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (USPTO), in
collaboration with other U.S.
Government agencies, is leading an
effort to identify and assess the
challenges U.S. inventors are facing
with China’s judicial and administrative
patent enforcement systems. The
USPTO would like to address the
concerns of rights holders by working
with them to identify problems—such
as difficulties in gathering evidence,
meeting evidentiary requirements,
protecting proprietary information,
obtaining adequate damages, and
enforcing preliminary injunctions—to
then find ways to address these issues
with the Chinese Government.
As part of this effort, the USPTO, in
coordination with the White House
Intellectual Property Enforcement
Coordinator (IPEC), has conducted a
series of roundtables to obtain the views
of diverse members of the patent
community who have first-hand
experience enforcing their patents in
China. Roundtables were held on July
19, 2011, in Washington, DC; on July 26,
2011, in Beijing, China; on July 29,
2011, in Shanghai, China; and on
August 1, 2011, in Guangzhou, China.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
64076
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2011 / Notices
Topics for discussion included: (1)
Acquisition and enforcement of utility
model and design patents; (2) evidence
collection and preservation in Chinese
courts; (3) obtaining damages and
injunctions; (4) enforceability of court
orders; and (5) administrative patent
enforcement.
To ensure that the USPTO receives a
wide array of views, the USPTO would
like to invite any member of the public
to submit written comments on China’s
patent enforcement system, including,
but not limited to, the five specific
issues listed above. Examples of firsthand experience using China’s patent
enforcement system, and
recommendations on ways to improve
the system, are encouraged. Based on
these comments, the USPTO intends to
produce a report that details the patent
enforcement landscape in China and
identifies any challenges faced by U.S.
innovators, together with
recommendations for improving the
system.
Effective Date: October 17, 2011.
Dates and Times: The deadline for
receipt of written comments for
consideration by the USPTO on the five
categories of issues listed above, or on
any other issues pertaining to China’s
patent enforcement system, is November
4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent by electronic mail message via
the Internet addressed to
IP.Policy@uspto.gov. Comments may
also be submitted by mail addressed to:
Mail Stop OPEA, United States Patent
and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450, Attn:
Elizabeth Shaw. Although comments
may be submitted by mail, the USPTO
prefers to receive comments via the
Internet. If you would like to submit
confidential business information that
supports your comments, please contact
Elizabeth Shaw at
elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571–272–
8494.
The written comments will be
available for public inspection by
appointment only at the Office of Policy
and External Affairs in the Executive
Library located in the Madison West
Building, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany
Street, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314.
Contact: Elizabeth Shaw at
elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571–272–
8494.
Because comments will be made
available for public inspection,
information that is not desired to be
made public, such as an address or
phone number should not be included
in the comments.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Oct 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Shaw, Office of Policy and
External Affairs, by phone 571–272–
8494, by facsimile to 571–273–0123, by
e-mail at elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or
by mail addressed to: Mail Stop OPEA,
United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria,
Virginia 22313–1450, ATTN: Elizabeth
Shaw.
As the
second largest economy in the world,
China continues to attract U.S.
businesses interested in tapping into its
growing domestic demand and rapid
market growth. As U.S. innovators
continue to export their products and
services into China, the effective
functioning of China’s patent
enforcement system will be critical to
the success of U.S. innovators in China.
The State Intellectual Property Office
(SIPO) of the People’s Republic of China
is now one of the largest patent office in
the world in terms of patent filings. It
received 1.2 million patent applications
in 2010. Despite an increase in the
number of patents obtained in China,
the number of patent cases filed in
Chinese courts has remained relatively
unchanged since 2005.
Patent enforcement in China
comprises two mechanisms—judicial
and administrative. Concerns over
China’s judiciary (such as lack of
adequate discovery powers, evidentiary
burdens, and low damages rewards)
have been cited as reasons why U.S. and
foreign companies do not file more
patent suits in Chinese courts. Indeed,
according to China’s Supreme People’s
Court, only about 4 percent of civil IP
cases in China involve foreign parties.
Furthermore, China issues utility model
and design patents that do not undergo
substantive examination and have
complicated actual inventors’ pursuit
and enforcement of their IP rights in
China.
In addition to judicial patent
enforcement in Chinese courts, patent
enforcement in China can also occur
administratively in SIPO’s provincial IP
offices, which have the authority to
issue cease-and-desist orders, seize
infringing goods, and exact penalties
against infringers. The limited
investigative powers of the agency and
ineffectual penalties have been cited as
reasons for the weakness of this
enforcement route.
The USPTO has conducted a series of
roundtables to evaluate U.S. rights
holders’ views of China’s patent
enforcement system. These views have
included first-hand experiences
enforcing patent rights in China,
defending against charges of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
infringement in China, as well as
suggestions for future improvements to
the system. The USPTO heard from a
number of roundtable participants from
diverse sources including practitioners,
industry, trade organizations, academia,
and government.
To ensure that the USPTO receives a
wide array of views on China’s patent
enforcement system, the USPTO is now
seeking written comments on patent
enforcement issues in China, including
but not limited to (1) acquisition and
enforcement of utility model and design
patents; (2) evidence collection and
preservation in Chinese courts; (3)
obtaining damages and injunctions; (4)
enforceability of court orders; and (5)
administrative patent enforcement. Any
member of the public may submit
written comments. Examples of firsthand experience using China’s patent
enforcement system, and
recommendations on ways to improve
the system, are encouraged. Based on
these comments, the USPTO intends to
produce a report that details the U.S.
view of the patent enforcement
landscape in China and identifies any
challenges faced by U.S. innovators,
together with recommendations for
improving the system.
Dated: October 5, 2011.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2011–26757 Filed 10–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No. PTO–C–2011–0055]
Performance Review Board (PRB)
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In conformance with the Civil
Service Reform Act of 1978, the United
States Patent and Trademark Office
announces the appointment of persons
to serve as members of its Performance
Review Board.
ADDRESSES: Director, Human Capital
Management, Office of Human
Resources, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Karlinchak at (571) 272–8717.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
membership of the United States Patent
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM
17OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 200 (Monday, October 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64075-64076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26757]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No. PTO-C-2011-0056]
Request for Comments on Intellectual Property Enforcement in
China
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Request for written submissions from the public.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As China has become a major trading partner for the United
States, U.S. rights holders are increasingly seeking to protect and
enforce their intellectual property (IP) in that country. China's
patent and trademark offices are now among the largest in the world in
terms of filings, and its IP enforcement system is being increasingly
utilized by U.S. rights holders. Ensuring that the Chinese IP system
works in a fair and timely manner for U.S. innovators is a top priority
for the U.S. Government.
To that end, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),
in collaboration with other U.S. Government agencies, is leading an
effort to identify and assess the challenges U.S. inventors are facing
with China's judicial and administrative patent enforcement systems.
The USPTO would like to address the concerns of rights holders by
working with them to identify problems--such as difficulties in
gathering evidence, meeting evidentiary requirements, protecting
proprietary information, obtaining adequate damages, and enforcing
preliminary injunctions--to then find ways to address these issues with
the Chinese Government.
As part of this effort, the USPTO, in coordination with the White
House Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC), has
conducted a series of roundtables to obtain the views of diverse
members of the patent community who have first-hand experience
enforcing their patents in China. Roundtables were held on July 19,
2011, in Washington, DC; on July 26, 2011, in Beijing, China; on July
29, 2011, in Shanghai, China; and on August 1, 2011, in Guangzhou,
China.
[[Page 64076]]
Topics for discussion included: (1) Acquisition and enforcement of
utility model and design patents; (2) evidence collection and
preservation in Chinese courts; (3) obtaining damages and injunctions;
(4) enforceability of court orders; and (5) administrative patent
enforcement.
To ensure that the USPTO receives a wide array of views, the USPTO
would like to invite any member of the public to submit written
comments on China's patent enforcement system, including, but not
limited to, the five specific issues listed above. Examples of first-
hand experience using China's patent enforcement system, and
recommendations on ways to improve the system, are encouraged. Based on
these comments, the USPTO intends to produce a report that details the
patent enforcement landscape in China and identifies any challenges
faced by U.S. innovators, together with recommendations for improving
the system.
DATES: Effective Date: October 17, 2011.
Dates and Times: The deadline for receipt of written comments for
consideration by the USPTO on the five categories of issues listed
above, or on any other issues pertaining to China's patent enforcement
system, is November 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent by electronic mail message
via the Internet addressed to IP.Policy@uspto.gov. Comments may also be
submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop OPEA, United States Patent
and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450, Attn:
Elizabeth Shaw. Although comments may be submitted by mail, the USPTO
prefers to receive comments via the Internet. If you would like to
submit confidential business information that supports your comments,
please contact Elizabeth Shaw at elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571-272-
8494.
The written comments will be available for public inspection by
appointment only at the Office of Policy and External Affairs in the
Executive Library located in the Madison West Building, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314. Contact: Elizabeth Shaw
at elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571-272-8494.
Because comments will be made available for public inspection,
information that is not desired to be made public, such as an address
or phone number should not be included in the comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Shaw, Office of Policy and
External Affairs, by phone 571-272-8494, by facsimile to 571-273-0123,
by e-mail at elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or by mail addressed to: Mail
Stop OPEA, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450, ATTN: Elizabeth Shaw.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As the second largest economy in the world,
China continues to attract U.S. businesses interested in tapping into
its growing domestic demand and rapid market growth. As U.S. innovators
continue to export their products and services into China, the
effective functioning of China's patent enforcement system will be
critical to the success of U.S. innovators in China.
The State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of the People's
Republic of China is now one of the largest patent office in the world
in terms of patent filings. It received 1.2 million patent applications
in 2010. Despite an increase in the number of patents obtained in
China, the number of patent cases filed in Chinese courts has remained
relatively unchanged since 2005.
Patent enforcement in China comprises two mechanisms--judicial and
administrative. Concerns over China's judiciary (such as lack of
adequate discovery powers, evidentiary burdens, and low damages
rewards) have been cited as reasons why U.S. and foreign companies do
not file more patent suits in Chinese courts. Indeed, according to
China's Supreme People's Court, only about 4 percent of civil IP cases
in China involve foreign parties. Furthermore, China issues utility
model and design patents that do not undergo substantive examination
and have complicated actual inventors' pursuit and enforcement of their
IP rights in China.
In addition to judicial patent enforcement in Chinese courts,
patent enforcement in China can also occur administratively in SIPO's
provincial IP offices, which have the authority to issue cease-and-
desist orders, seize infringing goods, and exact penalties against
infringers. The limited investigative powers of the agency and
ineffectual penalties have been cited as reasons for the weakness of
this enforcement route.
The USPTO has conducted a series of roundtables to evaluate U.S.
rights holders' views of China's patent enforcement system. These views
have included first-hand experiences enforcing patent rights in China,
defending against charges of infringement in China, as well as
suggestions for future improvements to the system. The USPTO heard from
a number of roundtable participants from diverse sources including
practitioners, industry, trade organizations, academia, and government.
To ensure that the USPTO receives a wide array of views on China's
patent enforcement system, the USPTO is now seeking written comments on
patent enforcement issues in China, including but not limited to (1)
acquisition and enforcement of utility model and design patents; (2)
evidence collection and preservation in Chinese courts; (3) obtaining
damages and injunctions; (4) enforceability of court orders; and (5)
administrative patent enforcement. Any member of the public may submit
written comments. Examples of first-hand experience using China's
patent enforcement system, and recommendations on ways to improve the
system, are encouraged. Based on these comments, the USPTO intends to
produce a report that details the U.S. view of the patent enforcement
landscape in China and identifies any challenges faced by U.S.
innovators, together with recommendations for improving the system.
Dated: October 5, 2011.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-26757 Filed 10-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P