Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Plastic Parts and Business Machines Coatings, 64020-64022 [2011-26638]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
64020
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
State effective
date
Provision
Cherokee County Ozone Attainment Demonstration and Ten-year Maintenance Plan.
*
*
*
*
Attainment Demonstration for the Appalachian, Catawba, Pee Dee,
Waccamaw, Santee Lynches, Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester, Low
Country, Lower Savannah, Central Midlands, and Upper Savannah
Early Action Compact Areas.
South Carolina Transportation Conformity Air Quality Implementation
Plan.
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–26772 Filed 10–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0600; FRL–9479–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Adoption of Control
Techniques Guidelines for Plastic
Parts and Business Machines Coatings
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland.
This SIP revision includes amendments
to the Code of Maryland (COMAR)
26.11.19.07, Volatile Organic
Compounds from Specific Processes,
Paper, Fabric, Film and Foil Coating,
and adds new COMAR 26.11.19.07–2,
Plastic Parts and Business Machines
Coating. Maryland’s SIP revision meets
the requirement to adopt Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)
for sources covered by EPA’s Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards
for plastic parts and business machines
coatings and will help Maryland attain
and maintain the National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone.
EPA is approving this revision
concerning the adoption of the CTG
requirements for plastic parts and
business machines coatings in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on November 16, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:28 Oct 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
EPA approval date
6/26/1998
12/18/1998, 63 FR
70019.
6/25/2004
*
*
8/26/2005, 70 FR 50195
11/19/2008
7/28/2009, 74 FR 37168
*
*
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0600. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during
normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, 42
U.S.C. 7511a(b)(2), requires that states
having moderate nonattainment areas
for ozone revise their SIP to include
provisions requiring the implementation
of RACT for certain sources, including
categories of volatile organic compound
(VOC) sources covered by a CTG
document issued by the Administrator
between November 15, 1990 and the
date of attainment. EPA originally
developed CTG standards for
miscellaneous metal and plastic
products, which includes plastic parts
and business machines coating, in 1978
and revised them in 2008. Maryland
subsequently made changes to its SIP
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Explanation
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
which adopted EPA’s CTG standards for
plastic parts and business machines
coatings. The formal SIP revision was
submitted by Maryland to EPA on June
22, 2011. On August 19, 2011 (76 FR
51922), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) for
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of Maryland’s SIP revision for adoption
of the CTG standards for plastic parts
and business machines coatings. No
comments were received on the NPR.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On June 22, 2011, the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE)
submitted to EPA a SIP revision (#11–
03) concerning the adoption of the
emission limits for plastic parts and
business machines coatings, part of the
EPA miscellaneous metal and plastic
parts coatings CTG. EPA develops CTGs
as guidance on control requirements for
source categories. States can follow the
CTGs or adopt more restrictive
standards. The State of Maryland has
adopted EPA’s CTG standards for plastic
parts and business machine coating
processes. These regulations are in
COMAR 26.11.19, Volatile Organic
Compounds from Specific Processes.
Specifically, this revision amends the
existing regulation at section
26.11.19.07 by moving existing VOC
coating standards for plastic parts and
vinyl from this section to a new section,
COMAR 26.11.19.07–2, Plastic Parts and
Business Machines Coating.
Additionally, coating standards for
plastic parts and business machines
from EPA’s CTG are being adopted into
COMAR 26.11.19.07–2, as well as new
definitions and application methods.
Tables 1–3 below outline the emission
standards adopted by Maryland for
plastic parts coatings, business
machines coatings, and printing
standards.
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
64021
TABLE 1—PLASTIC PARTS COATING STANDARDS
Applicability
(pounds of VOC
per day)
Coating installation
Decorative coating of other plastic parts .........................................................................
General, one-component .................................................................................................
General, multi-component ...............................................................................................
Electric dissipating coatings and shock-free coatings .....................................................
Extreme performance ......................................................................................................
Metallic .............................................................................................................................
Military specification, one-component .............................................................................
Military specification, multi-component ............................................................................
Mold seal .........................................................................................................................
Multi-colored coatings ......................................................................................................
Optical coatings ...............................................................................................................
Plastic vehicle parts .........................................................................................................
Vacuum-metalizing ..........................................................................................................
Vinyl .................................................................................................................................
Pounds of VOC
per gallon of
coating (as
applied minus
water)
20
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
20
15
20
5.9
2.3
3.5
6.7
3.5
3.5
2.8
3.5
6.3
5.7
6.7
3.0
6.7
3.8
Kilograms of
VOC per Liter
of coating (as
applied minus
water)
0.70
0.28
0.42
0.80
0.42
0.42
0.34
0.42
0.76
0.68
0.80
0.36
0.80
0.45
TABLE 2—BUSINESS MACHINES COATING STANDARDS
Applicability
(pounds of VOC
per day)
Coating installation
Prime coat ........................................................................................................................
Topcoat ............................................................................................................................
Texture coat .....................................................................................................................
Fog coat ...........................................................................................................................
Touchup and repair .........................................................................................................
Pounds of VOC
per gallon of
coating (as
applied minus
water)
15
15
15
15
15
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
Kilograms of
VOC per liter
of coating (as
applied minus
water)
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.26
0.35
TABLE 3—PRINTING STANDARDS
Printing installation
Applicability (pounds of VOC per day)
Plastic other than vinyl .............................................
Plastic other than vinyl .............................................
Non-major source .....................................................
Major
source
as
defined
in
COMAR
26.11.19.01B(4).
20 ..............................................................................
Vinyl ..........................................................................
Other specific requirements
concerning this rulemaking and the
rationale for EPA’s action are explained
in the NPR and the Technical Support
Document (TSD) and will not be
restated here.
No public comments were received on
the NPR.
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
Pounds of VOC
per gallon of
coating (as
applied minus
water)
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maryland’s
adoption of the CTG requirements for
plastic parts and business machines
coatings as a revision to the Maryland
SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:28 Oct 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Kilograms of
VOC per liter
of coating (as
applied minus
water)
5.8
3.8
0.69
0.45
3.8
0.45
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
64022
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by December 16, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action.
This action concerning Maryland’s
adoption of CTG standards for plastic
parts and business machines coatings
may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: October 03, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
COMAR 26.11.19.07 and adding an
entry for COMAR 26.11.19.07–2 to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.1070
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland
administrative
regulations (COMAR)
citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
26.11.19
EPA approval date
*
*
*
Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes
*
Additional explanation/
citation at 40 CFR
52.1100
*
*
26.11.19.07 ...............
*
*
*
Paper, Fabric, Film, and Foil Coating ...................
5/16/11
*
*
10/17/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
Revisions to Section title
and Sections .07A
and .07C(3).
*
26.11.19.07–2 ...........
*
*
*
Plastic Parts and Business Machines Coating .....
5/16/11
*
*
10/17/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
New Regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Lifting of Administrative Stay
for Hydrogen Sulfide.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ACTION:
40 CFR Part 372
[FR Doc. 2011–26638 Filed 10–14–11; 8:45 am]
*
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
[EPA–HQ–TRI–2009–0844; FRL–9463–5]
RIN 2025–AA27
Hydrogen Sulfide; Community Rightto-Know Toxic Chemical Release
Reporting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:28 Oct 14, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA is announcing that it is
lifting the Administrative Stay of the
Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) section 313
toxic chemical release reporting
requirements for hydrogen sulfide
(Chemical Abstracts Service Number
(CAS No.) 7783–06–4). Hydrogen
sulfide was added to the EPCRA section
313 list of toxic chemicals in a final rule
published in the Federal Register on
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 200 (Monday, October 17, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64020-64022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26638]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0600; FRL-9479-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Plastic Parts
and Business Machines Coatings
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland. This SIP revision includes
amendments to the Code of Maryland (COMAR) 26.11.19.07, Volatile
Organic Compounds from Specific Processes, Paper, Fabric, Film and Foil
Coating, and adds new COMAR 26.11.19.07-2, Plastic Parts and Business
Machines Coating. Maryland's SIP revision meets the requirement to
adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for sources
covered by EPA's Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards for
plastic parts and business machines coatings and will help Maryland
attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
for ozone. EPA is approving this revision concerning the adoption of
the CTG requirements for plastic parts and business machines coatings
in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on November 16,
2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0600. All documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the
Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard,
Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7511a(b)(2), requires that
states having moderate nonattainment areas for ozone revise their SIP
to include provisions requiring the implementation of RACT for certain
sources, including categories of volatile organic compound (VOC)
sources covered by a CTG document issued by the Administrator between
November 15, 1990 and the date of attainment. EPA originally developed
CTG standards for miscellaneous metal and plastic products, which
includes plastic parts and business machines coating, in 1978 and
revised them in 2008. Maryland subsequently made changes to its SIP
which adopted EPA's CTG standards for plastic parts and business
machines coatings. The formal SIP revision was submitted by Maryland to
EPA on June 22, 2011. On August 19, 2011 (76 FR 51922), EPA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for Maryland. The NPR proposed
approval of Maryland's SIP revision for adoption of the CTG standards
for plastic parts and business machines coatings. No comments were
received on the NPR.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On June 22, 2011, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)
submitted to EPA a SIP revision (11-03) concerning the
adoption of the emission limits for plastic parts and business machines
coatings, part of the EPA miscellaneous metal and plastic parts
coatings CTG. EPA develops CTGs as guidance on control requirements for
source categories. States can follow the CTGs or adopt more restrictive
standards. The State of Maryland has adopted EPA's CTG standards for
plastic parts and business machine coating processes. These regulations
are in COMAR 26.11.19, Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific
Processes. Specifically, this revision amends the existing regulation
at section 26.11.19.07 by moving existing VOC coating standards for
plastic parts and vinyl from this section to a new section, COMAR
26.11.19.07-2, Plastic Parts and Business Machines Coating.
Additionally, coating standards for plastic parts and business machines
from EPA's CTG are being adopted into COMAR 26.11.19.07-2, as well as
new definitions and application methods. Tables 1-3 below outline the
emission standards adopted by Maryland for plastic parts coatings,
business machines coatings, and printing standards.
[[Page 64021]]
Table 1--Plastic Parts Coating Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pounds of VOC Kilograms of
Applicability per gallon of VOC per Liter
Coating installation (pounds of VOC coating (as of coating (as
per day) applied minus applied minus
water) water)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decorative coating of other plastic parts................. 20 5.9 0.70
General, one-component.................................... 15 2.3 0.28
General, multi-component.................................. 15 3.5 0.42
Electric dissipating coatings and shock-free coatings..... 15 6.7 0.80
Extreme performance....................................... 15 3.5 0.42
Metallic.................................................. 15 3.5 0.42
Military specification, one-component..................... 15 2.8 0.34
Military specification, multi-component................... 15 3.5 0.42
Mold seal................................................. 15 6.3 0.76
Multi-colored coatings.................................... 15 5.7 0.68
Optical coatings.......................................... 15 6.7 0.80
Plastic vehicle parts..................................... 20 3.0 0.36
Vacuum-metalizing......................................... 15 6.7 0.80
Vinyl..................................................... 20 3.8 0.45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Business Machines Coating Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pounds of VOC Kilograms of
Applicability per gallon of VOC per liter
Coating installation (pounds of VOC coating (as of coating (as
per day) applied minus applied minus
water) water)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prime coat................................................ 15 2.9 0.35
Topcoat................................................... 15 2.9 0.35
Texture coat.............................................. 15 2.9 0.35
Fog coat.................................................. 15 2.9 0.26
Touchup and repair........................................ 15 2.9 0.35
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--Printing Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pounds of VOC Kilograms of
per gallon of VOC per liter
Printing installation Applicability (pounds of VOC coating (as of coating (as
per day) applied minus applied minus
water) water)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plastic other than vinyl.................... Non-major source.............. 5.8 0.69
Plastic other than vinyl.................... Major source as defined in 3.8 0.45
COMAR 26.11.19.01B(4).
Vinyl....................................... 20............................ 3.8 0.45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other specific requirements concerning this rulemaking and the
rationale for EPA's action are explained in the NPR and the Technical
Support Document (TSD) and will not be restated here.
No public comments were received on the NPR.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Maryland's adoption of the CTG requirements for
plastic parts and business machines coatings as a revision to the
Maryland SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
[[Page 64022]]
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 16, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action.
This action concerning Maryland's adoption of CTG standards for
plastic parts and business machines coatings may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: October 03, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for COMAR 26.11.19.07 and adding an entry for COMAR
26.11.19.07-2 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Regulations in the Maryland SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
Code of Maryland State explanation/
administrative regulations Title/subject effective EPA approval date citation at 40 CFR
(COMAR) citation date 52.1100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes
* * * * * * *
26.11.19.07................... Paper, Fabric, Film, and 5/16/11 10/17/11 [Insert Revisions to
Foil Coating. page number where Section title and
the document Sections .07A and
begins]. .07C(3).
* * * * * * *
26.11.19.07-2................. Plastic Parts and 5/16/11 10/17/11 [Insert New Regulation.
Business Machines page number where
Coating. the document
begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-26638 Filed 10-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
