Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning a Surgical Mask With a Protective Eye Shield, 63942-63944 [2011-26550]
Download as PDF
63942
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2011 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
New information collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Business Transformation—USCIS
Electronic Immigration System (ELIS).
(3) Agency Form Number, if any, and
the Applicable Component of the
Department of Homeland Security
Sponsoring the Collection: No form
number; U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS).
(4) Affected Public Who Will Be Asked
or Required to Respond, as Well as a
Brief Abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households. As part of the Business
Transformation initiative, USCIS is
developing an automated Electronic
Immigration System (USCIS ELIS). The
USCIS ELIS will use wizard technology
and will allow e-filing. Wizard
technology gives USCIS the ability to
electronically interact with its
customers by guiding them through the
application process and assisting them
to file complete and accurate benefit
requests.
(5) An Estimate of the Total Number
of Respondents and the Amount of Time
Estimated for an Average Respondent to
Respond: 58,500 responses at an average
of 2 hours and 15 minutes per response.
(6) An Estimate of the Total Public
Burden (In Hours) Associated With the
Collection: 131,625 annual burden
hours.
The information collection request
contains selected screen shots that
demonstrate the look and feel of the
automated USCIS ELIS, and a decision
tree to show the sequence of questions
that the public will be asked by the
wizard and the order in which the
questions will be asked. For example,
when the user answers the question
‘‘What is your First Name?’’ then he or
she will be prompted with the question:
‘‘What is your Given Name?’’ If you
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Oct 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
need to review this information
collection instrument, please visit the
Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/.
Dated: October 11, 2011.
Sunday Aigbe,
Chief, Regulatory Products Division, Office
of the Executive Secretariat, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–26653 Filed 10–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning a Surgical
Mask With a Protective Eye Shield
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of a Surgical Mask with a
Protective Eye Shield. Based upon the
facts presented, CBP has concluded in
the final determination that Turkey is
the country of origin of the Surgical
Mask with a Protective Eye Shield, for
purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
SUMMARY:
The final determination was
issued on October 5, 2011. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination on or before
November 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch: (202) 325–
0132.
DATES:
Notice is
hereby given that on October 5, 2011,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177,
subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of the Surgical Mask with a
Protective Eye Shield, which may be
offered to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, in
HQ H175429, was issued at the request
of Berkley Surgical Company, Inc. under
procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177,
subpart B, which implements Title III of
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the
final determination, CBP explained that,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
because the surgical mask is classified
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) as a textile
product, its country of origin is
governed by the country of origin rules
for textile products, which is set forth in
19 U.S.C. 3592. The country of origin
rules for textile products are
implemented by the CBP Regulations at
19 CFR 102.21. Applying the specific
rule of origin in 19 CFR 102.21 for
products classified in subheading
6370.90, HTSUS, we determined that
because the manufacturing process
involved in producing the surgical face
mask occurs in Turkey, the country of
origin of the surgical mask with an eyeshield for purposes of government
procurement is Turkey.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations
(19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: October 5, 2011.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
Attachment
HQ H175429
October 5, 2011
MAR–02 OT:RR:CTF:VS H175429 RSD
CATEGORY: MARKING
Mr. Domenic Tommarello, Vice President
Berkley Surgical Company
49 Virginia Avenue
Uniontown, Pennsylvania 15401
RE: Final Determination; U.S. Government
Procurement; Country of Origin of a
Surgical Face Mask with a Protective Eye
Shield; 19 CFR § 177.21; Textile Rules of
Origin, 19 CFR § 102.21(c)(4)
Dear Tommarello:
This is in response to a letter dated June
27, 2011, requesting a final determination
pursuant to subpart B Part 177, Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19
CFR § 177.21 et. seq.). Under these
regulations, which implement Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(codified at 19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations on whether an article is
or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purpose of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government. This final determination
concerns the country of origin of a fluid
resistant surgical face mask with an eye
shield. We note that Berkley Surgical
Company (Berkley) is a party-at-interest
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2011 / Notices
within the meaning of 19 CFR § 177.22(d)(1)
and is entitled to request this final
determination.
FACTS:
The product at issue is a surgical face mask
with an eye shield. The product is made to
be compliant with the United States Food
and Drug Administration’s (FDA)
requirements for such medical devices.
Berkley imports fluid resistant surgical face
masks without the eye shields from Turkey.
According to the information submitted, the
surgical face masks without eye shields are
manufactured in Turkey. The outer facing of
the surgical face masks are made from
printed cellulose or colored polypropylene
spun bond non-woven. The surgical mask
has two filters inside of it. The first filter is
made from 100 percent melt-blown
polypropylene and is made in the U.S. The
second filter is made of non-woven netting.
The inner facing of the mask is made from
a white cellulose material. In order to keep
the surgical mask in place, it contains a nose
wire made from aluminum or coated metal
wire. To tie the mask around the face, edge
tapes and tie tapes made of polypropylene or
polyester non-woven are used. The surgical
mask has ear loops made from knitted
polyester. All of the other fabrics used in
producing the surgical face mask are made in
Turkey.
After the surgical mask is imported into the
U.S., the transparent eye shield is
permanently attached to it through an
ultrasonic bonding process. The eye shield
provides the wearer splash protection for the
eyes, nose and mouth area in a single-device.
This eliminates the need for separate and
more expensive eye-wear. The eye-shield is
made in the United States of optical quality
polyester film. The eye-shield accounts for
more than 68 percent of the total value of the
finished product. The final product is
packaged in the United States with packer
boxes and shipper boxes manufactured in the
United States.
You have indicated that the finished
surgical face mask with an eye-shield is
classified in subheading 6307.90.98 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Samples were submitted
with your request.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
finished surgical mask with a protective eye
shield for purposes of U.S. government
procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 C.F.R
§ 177.21 et seq., which implements Title III
of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purpose of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19
U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Oct 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the
case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it has
been substantially transformed into a
new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R § 177.22(a) defining
‘‘country of origin’’ in identical terms.
In rendering advisory rulings and final
determinations for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement, CBP applies the
provisions of Subpart B of Part 177 consistent
with the Federal Procurement Regulations.
See 19 CFR § 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the Federal Procurement
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government’s
purchase of products to U.S.-made or
designated country end products for
acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR
§ 25.403(c)(1).
The Federal Procurement Regulations
define ‘‘U.S.-made end product’’ as: * * * an
article that is mined, produced, or
manufactured in the United States or that is
substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was transformed. See 48 CFR
§ 25.003. Therefore, the question presented in
this final determination is whether, as a
result of the operations performed in the
United States, the imported surgical face
mask is substantially transformed into a
product of the United States.
With regard to the surgical face mask with
a protective eye shield at issue, your request
involves determining whether the article is a
U.S.-made end product or a product of
Turkey. The information submitted indicates
that the surgical mask is made chiefly from
non-woven textile fabrics. You also indicate
that it is classified in subheading 6307.90.98,
HTSUS, as a textile product. The rules of
origin for textile products for purposes of the
customs laws and the administration of
quantitative restrictions are governed by 19
U.S.C. § 3592, unless otherwise provided for
by statute. See Headquarters Ruling (HQ)
H112725 dated October 6, 2010. These
provisions are implemented in the CBP
Regulations at 19 CFR § 102.21. Section 3592
has been described as Congress’s expression
of substantial transformation as it relates to
textile products. Therefore, country of origin
of the surgical face mask for government
procurement purposes will be determined
under the textile rules of origin.
As the finished surgical face mask is
produced by processing in more than one
country, its origin cannot be determined by
application of 19 CFR § 102.21(c)(1), wholly
obtained or produced rule, and resort must
be made to 19 CFR § 102.21(c)(2). Section
102.21(c)(2) states that the origin of a good
is the country ‘‘in which each foreign
material incorporated in that good underwent
an applicable change in tariff classification,
and/or met any other requirement, specified
for the good in paragraph (e) of [102.21].’’
Section 102.21(e) provides in pertinent part:
The following rules will apply for purposes
of determining the country of origin of a
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63943
textile or apparel product under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section:
6307.90 The country of origin of a good
classifiable under subheading 6307.90 is
the country, territory, or insular
possession in which the fabric
comprising the good was formed by a
fabric-making process.
As you have indicated, while most of the
fabric used in producing the surgical face
mask is made in Turkey, the melt-blown
polypropylene fabric used in one of the filter
linings of the surgical mask is made in the
United States. Consequently, there is more
than one country involved in the fabricmaking process, and thus 19 CFR
§ 102.21(c)(2) is inapplicable.
19 CFR § 102.21(c)(3) states in pertinent
part,
Where the country of origin of a textile or
apparel cannot be determined under
paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this section:
(ii) Except for goods of * * * subheading
* * * 6307.90 * * * if the good was not
knit to shape and the good was wholly
assembled in a single country, territory,
or insular possession, the country of
origin of the good is the country,
territory, or insular possession in which
the good was wholly assembled.
As the subject merchandise is not knit to
shape, and is classified in heading 6307.90,
HTSUS, section 102.21(c)(3) is also
inapplicable.
Section 102.21(c)(4) states, ‘‘Where the
country of origin of a textile or apparel
product cannot be determined under
paragraph (c)(1), (2) or (3) of this section, the
country of origin of the good is the single
country, territory or insular possession in
which the most important assembly or
manufacturing process occurred’’.
In this case, there are two basic processes
involved in producing the finished good. The
first process is the manufacture of the
surgical face mask in Turkey from the various
non-woven textile fabrics. The second
process is the attachment of the protective
eye-shield to the surgical face mask using
ultrasonic bonding which occurs in the
United States. We believe of these two
processes that the more important one is the
manufacturing process of the surgical face
mask from the various fabrics in Turkey. The
surgical face mask is the more significant part
of the completed item because even without
the protective eye-shield, the surgical face
mask can still be worn across the face and
be used when performing surgical
procedures. On the other hand, the protective
eye-shield must be attached to the surgical
mask; otherwise, it is completely useless. The
assembly of eye-shield to the surgical mask
constitutes only an enhancement to the
surgical face mask, but it does not change the
fundamental nature or the basic use of the
product. In addition, the manufacture of the
surgical facial mask from the various fabrics
seems to be a more complex operation then
the relatively simple assembly operation of
using an ultrasonic bonding process to attach
the protective eye-shield to the surgical face
mask. Consequently, we conclude that the
manufacture of the surgical face mask from
various non-woven fabrics occurring in
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
63944
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2011 / Notices
Turkey is the most important process
involved in producing the finished product.
Therefore, we find in accordance with 19
CFR § 102.21(c)(4), the country of origin of
the surgical face mask with a protective eyeshield for purposes of government
procurement is Turkey.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts and analysis set forth
above, the finished surgical face mask with
a protective eye-shield is a product of Turkey
for the purpose of government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register, as required by
19 CFR § 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested the final
determination may request, pursuant to 19
CFR § 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter
anew and issue a new final determination.
Any party-at-interest may, within 30 days
after publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial review
of this final determination before the Court
of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2011–26550 Filed 10–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
[Docket No. FR–5477–N–41a]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
to Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita Perry, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Oct 13, 2011
Jkt 226001
Dated: October 6, 2011.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2011–26317 Filed 10–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2011–N202; 30120–1112–
0000–F6]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Incidental Take Permit
Application; Proposed Low-Effect
Habitat Conservation Plan and
Associated Documents; Duke Energy
Corp., Gibson County, IN
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, invite the public to
comment on the following application
to conduct certain activities with
endangered species. With some
exceptions, the Endangered Species Act
(Act) prohibits activities with
endangered and threatened species
unless a Federal permit allows such
activity. The Act requires that we invite
public comment before issuing these
permits.
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY:
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
We must receive any written
comments on or before November 14,
2011.
DATES:
Send written comments by
U.S. Mail to the Regional Director, Attn:
Lisa Mandell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services, 5600
American Blvd., West, Suite 990,
Bloomington, MN 55437–1458; or by
electronic mail to permitsR3ES@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Mandell, (612) 713–5343.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We invite
public comment on the following permit
application for certain activities with
endangered species authorized by
section 10(a)(2)(A) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) and our regulations
governing the taking of endangered
species in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17. Submit
your written data, comments, or request
for a copy of the complete application
and Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) to
the address shown in ADDRESSES.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
In 1986, a single pair of endangered
Interior least terns (Sterna antillarum)
nested at Cinergy Corporation’s
(Cinergy) Gibson Generating Station in
Gibson County, Indiana. Since that time,
the least tern colony at the facility has
grown. During the 1990s, Cinergy
worked cooperatively with the Indiana
Department of Natural Resources (IDNR)
and the Service to maintain favorable
conditions for successful tern
production at the Gibson Generating
Station. Between 1986 and 1999, the
most terns recorded in a single year
(1998) included an estimated 85 adult
terns, 63 nests, and 72 fledged young.
In the late 1990s, Cinergy worked
cooperatively with the IDNR and the
Service to develop a Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) regarding
continued operation of the facility, and,
in late 1999, the Service issued an
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) to Cinergy.
In 2005, the ITP was renewed.
Management of the facility under the
HCP has promoted the continued
growth of the tern colony. In 2010, an
estimated 150 adults, 110 nests, and 165
fledged young were recorded. In
addition to the growth in numbers, the
tern colony has expanded to areas
beyond the original location along a
splitter dike adjacent to a cooling pond.
Nesting has now been documented on
the splitter dike, adjacent to ash ponds,
a coal combustion waste landfill,
construction areas and station access
roads. The expansion of the tern nesting
area presents management challenges
for the generating station and associated
facilities.
Current Proposal
Duke Power Company purchased and
merged with Cinergy Corp. to form Duke
Energy Corporation (Duke) in 2006.
Duke has continued to operate the
facility in accordance with the HCP and
the ITP. Duke has applied to the Service
for renewal of its ITP number TE016724.
An updated HCP accompanies this
renewal application. The HCP describes
management activities in and around
the Gibson Generating Station,
including water management, predator
control, and minimization of human
disturbance due to recreational use.
Proactive management over the past
25 years has resulted in an increase in
the Interior least tern population nesting
at Gibson Generating Station and
surrounding areas. However, no
incidental take of least terns has
occurred during that time. Actions that
may result in take include human
disturbance during management and
operations, including foot traffic,
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 199 (Friday, October 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63942-63944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26550]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning a Surgical
Mask With a Protective Eye Shield
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of a Surgical Mask with a Protective Eye Shield.
Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded in the final
determination that Turkey is the country of origin of the Surgical Mask
with a Protective Eye Shield, for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on October 5, 2011. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination on or before November 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch: (202) 325-0132.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on October 5,
2011, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of the Surgical Mask with a Protective Eye Shield,
which may be offered to the U.S. Government under an undesignated
government procurement contract. This final determination, in HQ
H175429, was issued at the request of Berkley Surgical Company, Inc.
under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP explained that,
because the surgical mask is classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) as a textile product, its country
of origin is governed by the country of origin rules for textile
products, which is set forth in 19 U.S.C. 3592. The country of origin
rules for textile products are implemented by the CBP Regulations at 19
CFR 102.21. Applying the specific rule of origin in 19 CFR 102.21 for
products classified in subheading 6370.90, HTSUS, we determined that
because the manufacturing process involved in producing the surgical
face mask occurs in Turkey, the country of origin of the surgical mask
with an eye-shield for purposes of government procurement is Turkey.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: October 5, 2011.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
Attachment
HQ H175429
October 5, 2011
MAR-02 OT:RR:CTF:VS H175429 RSD
CATEGORY: MARKING
Mr. Domenic Tommarello, Vice President
Berkley Surgical Company
49 Virginia Avenue
Uniontown, Pennsylvania 15401
RE: Final Determination; U.S. Government Procurement; Country of
Origin of a Surgical Face Mask with a Protective Eye Shield; 19 CFR
Sec. 177.21; Textile Rules of Origin, 19 CFR Sec. 102.21(c)(4)
Dear Tommarello:
This is in response to a letter dated June 27, 2011, requesting
a final determination pursuant to subpart B Part 177, Customs and
Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR Sec. 177.21 et.
seq.). Under these regulations, which implement Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (codified at 19 U.S.C.
Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations on whether an article is or would be a
product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purpose
of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S.
law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government. This final determination concerns the country of origin
of a fluid resistant surgical face mask with an eye shield. We note
that Berkley Surgical Company (Berkley) is a party-at-interest
[[Page 63943]]
within the meaning of 19 CFR Sec. 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to
request this final determination.
FACTS:
The product at issue is a surgical face mask with an eye shield.
The product is made to be compliant with the United States Food and
Drug Administration's (FDA) requirements for such medical devices.
Berkley imports fluid resistant surgical face masks without the eye
shields from Turkey. According to the information submitted, the
surgical face masks without eye shields are manufactured in Turkey.
The outer facing of the surgical face masks are made from printed
cellulose or colored polypropylene spun bond non-woven. The surgical
mask has two filters inside of it. The first filter is made from 100
percent melt-blown polypropylene and is made in the U.S. The second
filter is made of non-woven netting. The inner facing of the mask is
made from a white cellulose material. In order to keep the surgical
mask in place, it contains a nose wire made from aluminum or coated
metal wire. To tie the mask around the face, edge tapes and tie
tapes made of polypropylene or polyester non-woven are used. The
surgical mask has ear loops made from knitted polyester. All of the
other fabrics used in producing the surgical face mask are made in
Turkey.
After the surgical mask is imported into the U.S., the
transparent eye shield is permanently attached to it through an
ultrasonic bonding process. The eye shield provides the wearer
splash protection for the eyes, nose and mouth area in a single-
device. This eliminates the need for separate and more expensive
eye-wear. The eye-shield is made in the United States of optical
quality polyester film. The eye-shield accounts for more than 68
percent of the total value of the finished product. The final
product is packaged in the United States with packer boxes and
shipper boxes manufactured in the United States.
You have indicated that the finished surgical face mask with an
eye-shield is classified in subheading 6307.90.98 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Samples were submitted
with your request.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the finished surgical mask with
a protective eye shield for purposes of U.S. government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 C.F.R Sec. 177.21 et
seq., which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country
of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an
article is or would be a product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purpose of granting waivers of certain ``Buy
American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists
in whole or in part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so
transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R Sec. 177.22(a) defining ``country of origin'' in
identical terms.
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions
of Subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement
Regulations. See 19 CFR Sec. 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes
that the Federal Procurement Regulations restrict the U.S.
Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated country
end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR Sec.
25.403(c)(1).
The Federal Procurement Regulations define ``U.S.-made end
product'' as: * * * an article that is mined, produced, or
manufactured in the United States or that is substantially
transformed in the United States into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was transformed. See 48 CFR Sec.
25.003. Therefore, the question presented in this final
determination is whether, as a result of the operations performed in
the United States, the imported surgical face mask is substantially
transformed into a product of the United States.
With regard to the surgical face mask with a protective eye
shield at issue, your request involves determining whether the
article is a U.S.-made end product or a product of Turkey. The
information submitted indicates that the surgical mask is made
chiefly from non-woven textile fabrics. You also indicate that it is
classified in subheading 6307.90.98, HTSUS, as a textile product.
The rules of origin for textile products for purposes of the customs
laws and the administration of quantitative restrictions are
governed by 19 U.S.C. Sec. 3592, unless otherwise provided for by
statute. See Headquarters Ruling (HQ) H112725 dated October 6, 2010.
These provisions are implemented in the CBP Regulations at 19 CFR
Sec. 102.21. Section 3592 has been described as Congress's
expression of substantial transformation as it relates to textile
products. Therefore, country of origin of the surgical face mask for
government procurement purposes will be determined under the textile
rules of origin.
As the finished surgical face mask is produced by processing in
more than one country, its origin cannot be determined by
application of 19 CFR Sec. 102.21(c)(1), wholly obtained or
produced rule, and resort must be made to 19 CFR Sec. 102.21(c)(2).
Section 102.21(c)(2) states that the origin of a good is the country
``in which each foreign material incorporated in that good underwent
an applicable change in tariff classification, and/or met any other
requirement, specified for the good in paragraph (e) of [102.21].''
Section 102.21(e) provides in pertinent part:
The following rules will apply for purposes of determining the
country of origin of a textile or apparel product under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section:
6307.90 The country of origin of a good classifiable under
subheading 6307.90 is the country, territory, or insular possession
in which the fabric comprising the good was formed by a fabric-
making process.
As you have indicated, while most of the fabric used in
producing the surgical face mask is made in Turkey, the melt-blown
polypropylene fabric used in one of the filter linings of the
surgical mask is made in the United States. Consequently, there is
more than one country involved in the fabric-making process, and
thus 19 CFR Sec. 102.21(c)(2) is inapplicable.
19 CFR Sec. 102.21(c)(3) states in pertinent part,
Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel cannot be
determined under paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this section:
(ii) Except for goods of * * * subheading * * * 6307.90 * * * if
the good was not knit to shape and the good was wholly assembled in
a single country, territory, or insular possession, the country of
origin of the good is the country, territory, or insular possession
in which the good was wholly assembled.
As the subject merchandise is not knit to shape, and is
classified in heading 6307.90, HTSUS, section 102.21(c)(3) is also
inapplicable.
Section 102.21(c)(4) states, ``Where the country of origin of a
textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph
(c)(1), (2) or (3) of this section, the country of origin of the
good is the single country, territory or insular possession in which
the most important assembly or manufacturing process occurred''.
In this case, there are two basic processes involved in
producing the finished good. The first process is the manufacture of
the surgical face mask in Turkey from the various non-woven textile
fabrics. The second process is the attachment of the protective eye-
shield to the surgical face mask using ultrasonic bonding which
occurs in the United States. We believe of these two processes that
the more important one is the manufacturing process of the surgical
face mask from the various fabrics in Turkey. The surgical face mask
is the more significant part of the completed item because even
without the protective eye-shield, the surgical face mask can still
be worn across the face and be used when performing surgical
procedures. On the other hand, the protective eye-shield must be
attached to the surgical mask; otherwise, it is completely useless.
The assembly of eye-shield to the surgical mask constitutes only an
enhancement to the surgical face mask, but it does not change the
fundamental nature or the basic use of the product. In addition, the
manufacture of the surgical facial mask from the various fabrics
seems to be a more complex operation then the relatively simple
assembly operation of using an ultrasonic bonding process to attach
the protective eye-shield to the surgical face mask. Consequently,
we conclude that the manufacture of the surgical face mask from
various non-woven fabrics occurring in
[[Page 63944]]
Turkey is the most important process involved in producing the
finished product. Therefore, we find in accordance with 19 CFR Sec.
102.21(c)(4), the country of origin of the surgical face mask with a
protective eye-shield for purposes of government procurement is
Turkey.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts and analysis set forth above, the finished
surgical face mask with a protective eye-shield is a product of
Turkey for the purpose of government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested the final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR Sec. 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final determination. Any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days after publication of the Federal
Register notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2011-26550 Filed 10-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P