Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; PXI Systems Alliance, Inc., 63658 [2011-26428]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
63658
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2011 / Notices
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
October 5, 2011, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain devices for
mobile data communication that
infringe one or more of claims 1, 3, 5–
9, 33–36, and 47–50 of the ‘608 patent;
claims 1–11, 14–24, 28–33, and 35–38 of
the ‘212 patent; claims 1–14 and 27 of
the ‘037 patent; claims 12–44 and 63–
84 of the ‘409 patent; and claims 1–7,
9–19, and 21–29 of the ‘447 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists or is in the process of being
established as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Openwave Systems Inc., 2100 Seaport
Boulevard, Redwood City, CA 94063.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino,
CA 95014.
Research In Motion Ltd., 295 Phillip
Street, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3W8,
Canada.
Research In Motion Corp., 122 West
John Carpenter Parkway, Suite 430,
Irving, TX 75039.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Acting Chief Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:50 Oct 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
[FR Doc. 2011–26444 Filed 10–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993; ASTM International
Notice is hereby given that, on August
31, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ASTM International
(‘‘ASTM’’) has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing additions or
changes to its standards development
activities. The notifications were filed
for the purpose of extending the Act’s
provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, ASTM has provided an
updated list of current, ongoing ASTM
standards activities originating between
May 2011 and August 2011 designated
as Work Items. A complete listing of
ASTM Work Items, along with a brief
description of each, is available at
https://www.astm.org.
On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004
(69 FR 65226).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on May 11, 2011. A
notice was published in the Federal
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–26427 Filed 10–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993; PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.
Issued: October 6, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
PO 00000
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 13, 2011 (76 FR 34252).
For additional information, please
contact Thomas B. O’Brien, Jr., Vice
President and General Counsel, at 100
Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken,
PA 19428–2959, telephone # 610–832–
9597.
Notice is hereby given that, on
September 6, 2011, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), PXI
Systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Shikino High-Tech Co.
Ltd., Toyama, Japan, has been added as
a party to this venture. Also, DC to Light
Limited, Bray, Wicklow, Ireland, has
withdrawn as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and PXI Systems
Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all
changes in membership.
On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems
Alliance, Inc. filed its original
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of
the Act. The Department of Justice
published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on June 29, 2001. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 9, 2011 (76 FR 48883).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–26428 Filed 10–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 63658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26428]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993; PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on September 6, 2011, pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Shikino
High-Tech Co. Ltd., Toyama, Japan, has been added as a party to this
venture. Also, DC to Light Limited, Bray, Wicklow, Ireland, has
withdrawn as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
The last notification was filed with the Department on June 29,
2001. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 9, 2011 (76 FR 48883).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-26428 Filed 10-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
