Event Reporting Guidelines, 63565-63566 [2011-26419]
Download as PDF
63565
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 198
Thursday, October 13, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Submitting Comments and Accessing
Information
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
[NRC–2011–0237]
Event Reporting Guidelines
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is requesting comments on Draft
NUREG–1022, Revision 3, ‘‘Event
Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and
50.73’’. The NUREG–1022 contains
guidelines that the NRC staff considers
acceptable for use in meeting the event
reporting requirements for operating
nuclear power reactors. Revision 3 to
NUREG–1022 incorporates revisions to
the guidelines for the purpose of
clarification.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments by December
12, 2011. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the Commission is able to
ensure consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2011–0237 in the subject line of
your comments. For additional
instructions on submitting comments
and instructions on accessing
documents related to this action, see
‘‘Submitting Comments and Accessing
Information’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
You may submit comments by any one
of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2011–0237. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301–492–3668; e-mail:
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:59 Oct 12, 2011
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
• Fax comments to: RADB at 301–
492–3446.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 226001
Comments submitted in writing or in
electronic form will be posted on the
NRC Web site and on the Federal
rulemaking Web site, https://
www.regulations.gov. Because your
comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information,
the NRC cautions you against including
any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party
soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for
submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their
comments to remove any identifying or
contact information, and therefore, they
should not include any information in
their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed.
You can access publicly available
documents related to this document
using the following methods:
• NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR): The public may examine and
have copied, for a fee, publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–
F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents
created or received at the NRC are
available online in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this page, the public
can gain entry into ADAMS, which
provides text and image files of the
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s
PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Draft NUREG–
1022, Revision 3 may be found in the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) under
Accession No. ML11273A065. The NRC
staff has also prepared an accompanying
‘‘Discussion of Changes’’ document that
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
may be found in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML11068A030.
• Federal Rulemaking Web Site:
Public comments and supporting
materials related to this notice can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching on Docket ID NRC–2011–
0237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Kobetz, Reactor Inspection
Branch, Division of Inspections and
Regional Support, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
1932, e-mail: Timothy.Kobetz@nrc.gov.
Background
The NUREG–1022 contains guidelines
that the NRC staff considers acceptable
for use in meeting the reporting
requirements of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.72 and
10 CFR 50.73. Revision 3 to NUREG–
1022 incorporates revisions to the
guidelines for the purpose of
clarification. The NRC held a public
meeting on June 8 and 9, 2010, with
internal and external stakeholders to
solicit comments on identified issues
with NUREG–1022, Revision 2, as well
as to identify new issues (see ADAMS
Accession Nos. ML101241083 and
ML101720219 for additional
information). A teleconference meeting
with external stakeholders was held on
July 19, 2010, to clarify some items
listed in the June public meeting
summary (see ADAMS Accession No.
ML102170301 for additional
information). The NRC held another
public meeting on October 14, 2010,
with internal and external stakeholders
to discuss the NRC’s disposition of the
previously identified items (see ADAMS
Accession Nos. ML102630270 and
ML102940281 for additional
information). In addition, external
stakeholders submitted documents to
the NRC for consideration. Documents
were submitted on July 20, 2010
(ADAMS Accession No. ML101930338),
August 8, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML102230269), August 21, 2010
(ADAMS Accession No. ML102360197),
and October 29 and November 10, 2010
(ADAMS Accession No. ML103190310).
A discussion of the changes in Draft
NUREG–1022, Revision 3, may be found
in the ‘‘Discussion of Changes’’
document (ADAMS Accession No.
ML11068A030). Items in Draft NUREG–
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
63566
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2011 / Proposed Rules
1022, Revision 3, that are underlined are
new and not found in Revision 2, and
items that have a strikethrough are being
deleted from Revision 2. Although the
underlines and strikethroughs are
included in the draft document, the
staff’s intention is to remove them upon
final publication of NUREG–1022,
Revision 3. Any changes in the draft
that are not discussed in the
‘‘Discussion of Changes’’ document are
to be considered editorial in nature and
should not be construed to have any
regulatory or technical significance.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the
Backfit Rule, 10 CFR 50.109,
‘‘Backfitting,’’ does not apply to the
issuance of the revised guidance in
NUREG–1022, Revision 3. The revised
guidance in NUREG–1022, Revision 3,
addresses compliance with the
information collection and reporting
requirements in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10
CFR 50.73. The Backfit Rule does not
apply to information collection and
reporting requirements. Therefore, the
NRC has not prepared a backfit analysis
for the issuance of Revision 3 to
NUREG–1022.
In addition, the NRC has determined
that issuance of the revised guidance in
NUREG–1022, Revision 3, is not
inconsistent with any of the issue
finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52,
‘‘Licenses, certifications, and approvals
for nuclear power plants.’’ Those issue
finality provisions do not apply to
information collection and reporting
obligations imposed on operators of
nuclear power plants. In addition, the
issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part
52 do not apply to prospective
applicants. As of the issuance of this
revised guidance, there are no holders of
combined licenses under 10 CFR part
52. Hence, there are no entities
currently protected by 10 CFR part 52
issue finality provisions relevant to
operation (i.e., the period after the
Commission has made the finding under
10 CFR 52.103(g)). Therefore, the NRC is
not precluded from issuing NUREG–
1022, Revision 3, by any of the 10 CFR
Part 52 issue finality provisions.
Regulatory Analysis
The NRC performs regulatory analyses
to support many NRC actions that affect
nuclear power reactor and nonpower
reactor licensees. The regulatory
analysis process is intended to be an
integral part of the NRC’s
decisionmaking that systematically
provides complete disclosure of the
relevant information supporting a
regulatory decision. The NUREG/BR–
0058, Revision 4, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:59 Oct 12, 2011
Jkt 226001
Guidelines of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission,’’ issued
September 2004 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML042820192) sets forth the NRC’s
policy for the preparation and the
contents of regulatory analyses. As
discussed in Section 2.2 of NUREG/BR–
0058, Revision 4, mechanisms used by
the NRC staff to establish or
communicate generic requirements,
guidance, requests, or staff positions
that would affect a change in the use of
resources by its licensees should
include an accompanying regulatory
analysis. The changes found in Draft
NUREG–1022, Revision 3, can be
construed as offering new positions or
possibly affecting licensee resources. As
a result, the staff determined that it
should perform a regulatory analysis in
order to provide complete disclosure of
the relevant information supporting
decisions associated with changes found
in Draft NUREG–1022, Revision 3. The
regulatory analysis can be found in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML11116A168.
Public Comments
This document requests comments
from interested members of the public
by December 12, 2011. After evaluating
the comments received, the staff will
either reconsider the proposed change
or announce the availability of the
change in a subsequent document
published in the Federal Register
(perhaps with some changes as a result
of public comments).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of September 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Timothy Kobetz,
Branch Chief, Reactor Inspection Branch,
Division of Inspections and Regional Support,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–26419 Filed 10–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
RIN 1904–AC62
Efficiency and Renewables Advisory
Committee, Appliance Standards
Subcommittee, Negotiated Rulemaking
Subcommittee/Working Group for
Liquid-Immersed and Medium- and
Low-Voltage Dry-Type Distribution
Transformers
Department of Energy, Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This document announces an
open meeting of two Negotiated
Rulemaking Working Groups; one
concerning Liquid Immersed and
Medium-Voltage Dry-Type and the
second addressing Low-Voltage DryType Distribution Transformers. The
Liquid Immersed and Medium-Voltage
Dry-Type Group (MV Group) and the
Low-Voltage Dry-Type Group (LV
Group) are working groups within the
Appliance Standards Subcommittee of
the Efficiency and Renewables Advisory
Committee (ERAC). The purpose of the
MV and LV Groups is to discuss and, if
possible, reach consensus on a proposed
rule for regulating the energy efficiency
of distribution transformers, as
authorized by the Energy Policy
Conservation Act (EPCA) of 1975, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(C) and
6317(a).
SUMMARY:
Tuesday, November 8, 2011;
9 a.m.–6 p.m., Wednesday, November 9,
2011; 9 a.m.–6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting on November
8, 2011, will be held at the Edison
Electric Institute, 701 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004–
2696.
The meeting on November 9, 2011,
will be held at the U.S. Department of
Energy, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, Room 6097–
6098, Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Building Technologies (EE–2J),
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–1692. E-mail:
John.Cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: DOE has decided to use
the negotiated rulemaking process to
develop proposed energy efficiency
standards for distribution transformers.
The primary reasons for using the
negotiated rulemaking process for
developing a proposed Federal standard
is that stakeholders strongly support a
consensual rulemaking effort and DOE
believes such a regulatory negotiation
process will be less adversarial and
better suited to resolving the complex
technical issues raised by this
rulemaking. An important virtue of
negotiated rulemaking is that it allows
expert dialog that is much better than
traditional techniques at getting the
facts and issues right and will result in
a proposed rule that will effectively
reflect Congressional intent.
A regulatory negotiation will enable
DOE to engage in direct and sustained
dialog with informed, interested, and
affected parties when drafting the
proposed regulation that is then
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63565-63566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26419]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 63565]]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
[NRC-2011-0237]
Event Reporting Guidelines
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft NUREG; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is requesting comments on Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, ``Event
Reporting Guidelines: 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73''. The NUREG-1022 contains
guidelines that the NRC staff considers acceptable for use in meeting
the event reporting requirements for operating nuclear power reactors.
Revision 3 to NUREG-1022 incorporates revisions to the guidelines for
the purpose of clarification.
DATES: Submit comments by December 12, 2011. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the
Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received
on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID NRC-2011-0237 in the subject line
of your comments. For additional instructions on submitting comments
and instructions on accessing documents related to this action, see
``Submitting Comments and Accessing Information'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document. You may submit comments by any
one of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC-
2011-0237. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone: 301-492-3668; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
Fax comments to: RADB at 301-492-3446.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments and Accessing Information
Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be posted
on the NRC Web site and on the Federal rulemaking Web site, https://www.regulations.gov. Because your comments will not be edited to remove
any identifying or contact information, the NRC cautions you against
including any information in your submission that you do not want to be
publicly disclosed.
The NRC requests that any party soliciting or aggregating comments
received from other persons for submission to the NRC inform those
persons that the NRC will not edit their comments to remove any
identifying or contact information, and therefore, they should not
include any information in their comments that they do not want
publicly disclosed.
You can access publicly available documents related to this
document using the following methods:
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine
and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC's
PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC
are available online in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain entry into ADAMS,
which provides text and image files of the NRC's public documents. If
you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's PDR reference staff
at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3 may be found in the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML11273A065.
The NRC staff has also prepared an accompanying ``Discussion of
Changes'' document that may be found in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML11068A030.
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and
supporting materials related to this notice can be found at https://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID NRC-2011-0237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Kobetz, Reactor Inspection
Branch, Division of Inspections and Regional Support, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1932, e-mail: Timothy.Kobetz@nrc.gov.
Background
The NUREG-1022 contains guidelines that the NRC staff considers
acceptable for use in meeting the reporting requirements of Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.72 and 10 CFR 50.73.
Revision 3 to NUREG-1022 incorporates revisions to the guidelines for
the purpose of clarification. The NRC held a public meeting on June 8
and 9, 2010, with internal and external stakeholders to solicit
comments on identified issues with NUREG-1022, Revision 2, as well as
to identify new issues (see ADAMS Accession Nos. ML101241083 and
ML101720219 for additional information). A teleconference meeting with
external stakeholders was held on July 19, 2010, to clarify some items
listed in the June public meeting summary (see ADAMS Accession No.
ML102170301 for additional information). The NRC held another public
meeting on October 14, 2010, with internal and external stakeholders to
discuss the NRC's disposition of the previously identified items (see
ADAMS Accession Nos. ML102630270 and ML102940281 for additional
information). In addition, external stakeholders submitted documents to
the NRC for consideration. Documents were submitted on July 20, 2010
(ADAMS Accession No. ML101930338), August 8, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML102230269), August 21, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102360197), and
October 29 and November 10, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML103190310). A
discussion of the changes in Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, may be found
in the ``Discussion of Changes'' document (ADAMS Accession No.
ML11068A030). Items in Draft NUREG-
[[Page 63566]]
1022, Revision 3, that are underlined are new and not found in Revision
2, and items that have a strikethrough are being deleted from Revision
2. Although the underlines and strikethroughs are included in the draft
document, the staff's intention is to remove them upon final
publication of NUREG-1022, Revision 3. Any changes in the draft that
are not discussed in the ``Discussion of Changes'' document are to be
considered editorial in nature and should not be construed to have any
regulatory or technical significance.
Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the Backfit Rule, 10 CFR 50.109,
``Backfitting,'' does not apply to the issuance of the revised guidance
in NUREG-1022, Revision 3. The revised guidance in NUREG-1022, Revision
3, addresses compliance with the information collection and reporting
requirements in 10 CFR 50.72 and 10 CFR 50.73. The Backfit Rule does
not apply to information collection and reporting requirements.
Therefore, the NRC has not prepared a backfit analysis for the issuance
of Revision 3 to NUREG-1022.
In addition, the NRC has determined that issuance of the revised
guidance in NUREG-1022, Revision 3, is not inconsistent with any of the
issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52, ``Licenses,
certifications, and approvals for nuclear power plants.'' Those issue
finality provisions do not apply to information collection and
reporting obligations imposed on operators of nuclear power plants. In
addition, the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52 do not apply
to prospective applicants. As of the issuance of this revised guidance,
there are no holders of combined licenses under 10 CFR part 52. Hence,
there are no entities currently protected by 10 CFR part 52 issue
finality provisions relevant to operation (i.e., the period after the
Commission has made the finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g)). Therefore, the
NRC is not precluded from issuing NUREG-1022, Revision 3, by any of the
10 CFR Part 52 issue finality provisions.
Regulatory Analysis
The NRC performs regulatory analyses to support many NRC actions
that affect nuclear power reactor and nonpower reactor licensees. The
regulatory analysis process is intended to be an integral part of the
NRC's decisionmaking that systematically provides complete disclosure
of the relevant information supporting a regulatory decision. The
NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 4, ``Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,'' issued September 2004 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML042820192) sets forth the NRC's policy for the preparation and
the contents of regulatory analyses. As discussed in Section 2.2 of
NUREG/BR-0058, Revision 4, mechanisms used by the NRC staff to
establish or communicate generic requirements, guidance, requests, or
staff positions that would affect a change in the use of resources by
its licensees should include an accompanying regulatory analysis. The
changes found in Draft NUREG-1022, Revision 3, can be construed as
offering new positions or possibly affecting licensee resources. As a
result, the staff determined that it should perform a regulatory
analysis in order to provide complete disclosure of the relevant
information supporting decisions associated with changes found in Draft
NUREG-1022, Revision 3. The regulatory analysis can be found in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML11116A168.
Public Comments
This document requests comments from interested members of the
public by December 12, 2011. After evaluating the comments received,
the staff will either reconsider the proposed change or announce the
availability of the change in a subsequent document published in the
Federal Register (perhaps with some changes as a result of public
comments).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of September 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Timothy Kobetz,
Branch Chief, Reactor Inspection Branch, Division of Inspections and
Regional Support, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-26419 Filed 10-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P