Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 137 under Alternative Site Framework Washington Dulles International Airport, VA Area, 63283-63284 [2011-26365]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2011 / Notices
Board) by the City of Flint, grantee of
FTZ 140, requesting special-purpose
subzone status for the silicon-based
product manufacturing facility of Dow
Corning Corporation (Dow Corning),
located in Midland, Michigan. The
application was submitted pursuant to
the provisions of the Foreign-Trade
Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–
81u), and the regulations of the Board
(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed
on October 5, 2011.
The Dow Corning facility (1,250
employees, 489 acres, 450,000 metric
tons capacity) is located at 3901 S.
Saginaw Road, Midland, Michigan. The
facility is used for the manufacturing
and distribution of silicon-based
products including elastomers, resins,
fluids, silanes, polymers, gums, sealants
and emulsions. Components and
materials sourced from abroad
(representing 10% of the value of the
finished product) include: isododecane,
iso hexadecane, silicon metal, carbon
dioxide liquid, magnesium sulfate,
methallyl chloride, monochlorobenzene,
trifluoromethane sulfonic, ethylene
glycol, 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol,
glycerine, biocide, ionol CP, allylglycol,
allyl glycidyl ether, methyl ethyl ketone,
diacetone alcohol, octanoic acid,
undecylenic acid, monoplex dos, ethyl
silicate, sparc base,
dimethylethanolamine,
vinyltriacetoxysilane, dimethyl me
phosphonate,
hexamethylcyclotrisilazane, lutensol,
reactivated carbon, tonsil catalyst,
kathon CG preservative, acticide,
organosilane solution, silicone resin
solution, silicone dispersion, carbopol,
polycerin and KBM 802 (duty rate
ranges from duty-free to 7%). The
application indicates that any inputs
that fall under HTSUS Heading 3204
will be admitted to the subzone in
privileged foreign (PF) status (19 CFR
146.41). In addition, Dow Corning has
indicated that they will accept a
restriction prohibiting the admission of
foreign status silicon metal subject to an
antidumping or countervailing duty
order into the proposed subzone.
FTZ procedures could exempt Dow
Corning from customs duty payments
on the foreign components used in
export production. The company
anticipates that some 20 percent of the
plant’s shipments will be exported. On
its domestic sales, Dow Corning would
be able to choose the duty rates during
customs entry procedures that apply to
finished silicon-based products (duty
rate ranges from duty-free to 6.5%) for
the foreign inputs noted above. FTZ
designation would further allow Dow
Corning to realize logistical benefits
through the use of weekly customs entry
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 11, 2011
Jkt 226001
procedures. Customs duties also could
possibly be deferred or reduced on
foreign status production equipment.
The request indicates that the savings
from FTZ procedures would help
improve the plant’s international
competitiveness.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to
evaluate and analyze the facts and
information presented in the application
and case record and to report findings
and recommendations to the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address below. The closing period for
their receipt is December 12, 2011.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to December
26, 2011.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading
Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site,
which is accessible via https://
www.trade.gov/ftz.
For further information, contact
Elizabeth Whiteman at
Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202)
482–0473.
Dated: October 5, 2011.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–26364 Filed 10–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
63283
an application to the Board (FTZ Docket
33–2011, filed 5/12/2011) for authority
to reorganize under the ASF with a
service area that includes Lancaster,
Otoe and Seward Counties, Nebraska,
within and adjacent to the Omaha
Customs and Border Protection port of
entry, and FTZ 59’s existing Sites 1 and
2 would be categorized as magnet sites;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (76 FR 28952–28953, 5/19/
2011) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, Therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 59
under the alternative site framework is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the
overall general-purpose zone project,
and to a five-year ASF sunset provision
for magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Site 1 if not activated by
September 30, 2016.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
September 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.
ATTEST: ________________________________
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–26373 Filed 10–11–11; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Order No. 1783]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone
59 Under Alternative Site Framework;
Lincoln, NE
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) in
December 2008 (74 FR 1170–1173, 01/
12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/
2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010)
as an option for the establishment or
reorganization of general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Lincoln Foreign-Trade
Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 59, submitted
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1787]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone
137 under Alternative Site Framework
Washington Dulles International
Airport, VA Area
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) in
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09;
correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09; 75 FR
71069–71070, 11/22/10) as an option for
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
63284
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the establishment or reorganization of
general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Washington Dulles
Foreign Trade Zone Inc., grantee of
Foreign-Trade Zone 137, submitted an
application to the Board (FTZ Docket
19–2011, filed 03/14/11) for authority to
reorganize under the ASF with a service
area of Frederick, Clarke, Loudoun,
Fairfax, Fauquier, Prince William and
Arlington Counties and the City of
Alexandria, Virginia, in and adjacent to
the Washington Dulles International
Airport Customs and Border Protection
port of entry; the non-contiguous parcel
of Site 4 would be renumbered as Site
7; FTZ 137’s Sites 1–6 would be
categorized as magnet sites; and, Site 7
would be categorized as a usage-driven
site;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (76 FR 14900–14901, 03/18/11)
and the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendation of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 137
under the alternative site framework is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the
overall general-purpose zone project, to
a five-year ASF sunset provision for
magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 2–6 if not activated
by September 30, 2016, and to a threeyear ASF sunset provision for usagedriven sites that would terminate
authority for Site 7 if no foreign-status
merchandise is admitted for a bona fide
customs purpose by September 30,
2014.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
September 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board,
ATTEST: Andrew McGilvray, Executive
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–26365 Filed 10–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1781]
[Order No. 1785]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone
170 (Expansion of Service Area) under
Alternative Site Framework; Clark
County, Indiana
Reorganization/Expansion of ForeignTrade Zone 53 Under Alternative Site
Framework; Tulsa, OK
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR
1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987,
01/22/09; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/
10) as an option for the establishment or
reorganization of general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Ports of Indiana, grantee
of Foreign-Trade Zone 170, submitted
an application to the Board (FTZ Docket
37–2011, filed 5/23/2011) for authority
to expand the service area of the zone
to include Jefferson, Ripley, Dearborn,
Brown, Ohio and Switzerland Counties,
as described in the application, adjacent
to the Louisville, Kentucky; Cincinnati,
Ohio; and Indianapolis, Indiana
Customs and Border Protection ports of
entry;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (76 FR 30906–30907, 5/27/11)
and the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 170
to expand the service area under the
alternative site framework is approved,
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations, including Section 400.28,
and to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre
activation limit for the overall generalpurpose zone project.
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) in
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/
2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/
2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010)
as an option for the establishment or
reorganization of general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the City of Tulsa-Rogers
County Port Authority, grantee of
Foreign-Trade Zone 53, submitted an
application to the Board (FTZ Docket 8–
2011, filed 2/1/2011) for authority to
reorganize and expand under the ASF
with a service area of Rogers County,
Oklahoma, within and adjacent to the
Tulsa Customs and Border Protection
port of entry, FTZ 53’s existing Sites 1
through 5 would be categorized as
magnet sites, and the grantee proposes
two new magnet sites (Sites 6 and 7);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (76 FR 6600–6601, 2/7/2011)
and the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendation of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize and
expand FTZ 53 under the alternative
site framework is approved, subject to
the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.28, to the Board’s
standard 2,000-acre activation limit for
the overall general-purpose zone
project, and to a five-year ASF sunset
provision for magnet sites that would
terminate authority for Sites 1 through
7 if not activated by September 30,
2016.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of
September 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.
ATTEST: ________________________________
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–26377 Filed 10–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 11, 2011
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63283-63284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26365]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1787]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 137 under Alternative Site
Framework Washington Dulles International Airport, VA Area
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09;
75 FR 71069-71070, 11/22/10) as an option for
[[Page 63284]]
the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Washington Dulles Foreign Trade Zone Inc., grantee of
Foreign-Trade Zone 137, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ
Docket 19-2011, filed 03/14/11) for authority to reorganize under the
ASF with a service area of Frederick, Clarke, Loudoun, Fairfax,
Fauquier, Prince William and Arlington Counties and the City of
Alexandria, Virginia, in and adjacent to the Washington Dulles
International Airport Customs and Border Protection port of entry; the
non-contiguous parcel of Site 4 would be renumbered as Site 7; FTZ
137's Sites 1-6 would be categorized as magnet sites; and, Site 7 would
be categorized as a usage-driven site;
Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal
Register (76 FR 14900-14901, 03/18/11) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the
public interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 137 under the alternative site
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, to
a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 2-6 if not activated by September 30, 2016, and to
a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites that would
terminate authority for Site 7 if no foreign-status merchandise is
admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by September 30, 2014.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of September 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board,
ATTEST: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26365 Filed 10-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P