Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery, 63301-63302 [2011-26319]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2011 / Notices
implement such technologies and
methods.
The meeting site is fully accessible to
people using wheelchairs or other
mobility aids. Sign language
interpreters, open captioning, and
assistive listening devices will be
provided on site. Other reasonable
accommodations for people with
disabilities are available upon request.
In your request, include a description of
the accommodation you will need and
a way we can contact you if we need
more information. Last minute requests
will be accepted, but may be impossible
to fill. Send an e-mail to: fcc504@fcc.gov
or call the Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice),
202–418–0432 (TTY).
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau at
202–418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432
(TTY).
Federal Communications Commission.
Karen Peltz Strauss,
Deputy Chief, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2011–26259 Filed 10–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT
INVESTMENT BOARD
Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting
9 a.m. (Eastern Time)
October 17, 2011.
PLACE: 4th Floor Conference Room,
1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005.
STATUS: Open to the Public.
TIME AND DATE:
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Approval of the minutes of the
September 16, 2011 Board Member
Meeting.
2. Recognition of Outstanding Service
by Chairman Saul and Board Member
Sanchez.
3. Thrift Savings Plan Activity Report
by the Executive Director.
a. Monthly Participant Activity
Report.
b. Quarterly Investment Performance
Review.
c. Legislative Report.
4. Mid-Year Financial Audit Report.
5. Quarterly Vendor Financial Report.
Contact Person for More Information
Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office
of External Affairs, (202) 942–1640.
17:43 Oct 11, 2011
Jkt 226001
[FR Doc. 2011–26510 Filed 10–7–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Generic Clearance
for the Collection of Qualitative
Feedback on Agency Service Delivery
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE).
ACTION: 30-Day notice of submission of
information collection approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
and request for comments.
AGENCY:
As part of a Federal
Government-wide effort to streamline
the process to seek feedback from the
public on service delivery, The Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation (ASPE) has submitted a
Generic Information Collection Request
(Generic ICR): ‘‘Generic Clearance for
the Collection of Qualitative Feedback
on Agency Service Delivery’’ to OMB for
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et.
seq.).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
November 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted to the OS Paperwork
Clearance Officer at
Sherette.Funncoleman@hhs.gov
SUMMARY:
To
request additional information, please
contact Sherette.Funncoleman@hhs.gov
or call the Reports Clearance Office on
(202) 690–6162.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Comparative Effectiveness
Research Inventory.
Abstract: The information collection
activity will garner qualitative customer
and stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback we mean
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions,
but are not statistical surveys that yield
quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study.
This feedback will provide insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences and expectations, provide
an early warning of issues with service,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matters To Be Considered
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Dated: October 7, 2011.
Amanda Haas,
Executive Assistant, Federal Retirement Thrift
Investment Board.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63301
or focus attention on areas where
communication, training or changes in
operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the
Agency and its customers and
stakeholders. It will also allow feedback
to contribute directly to the
improvement of program management.
Feedback collected under this generic
clearance will provide useful
information, but it will not yield data
that can be generalized to the overall
population. This type of generic
clearance for qualitative information
will not be used for quantitative
information collections that are
designed to yield reliably actionable
results, such as monitoring trends over
time or documenting program
performance. Such data uses require
more rigorous designs that address: the
target population to which
generalizations will be made, the
sampling frame, the sample design
(including stratification and clustering),
the precision requirements or power
calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate,
methods for assessing potential nonresponse bias, the protocols for data
collection, and any testing procedures
that were or will be undertaken prior
fielding the study. Depending on the
degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be
eligible for submission for other generic
mechanisms that are designed to yield
quantitative results.
The Agency received no comments in
response to the 60-day notice published
in the Federal Register of December 22,
2010 (75 FR 80542).
Below we provide ASPE’s projected
average estimates for the next three
years:
Current Actions: New collection of
information.
Type of Review: Generic.
Affected Public: Individuals and
Households, Businesses and
Organizations, State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Average Expected Annual Number of
activities: [Agency Estimate] 1
Annual responses: [Agency Estimate]
500.
1 The 60-day notice included the following
estimate of the aggregate burden hours for this
generic clearance federal-wide:
Average Expected Annual Number of activities:
25,000.
Average number of Respondents per Activity:
200.
Annual responses: 5,000,000.
Frequency of Response: Once per request.
Average minutes per response: 30.
Burden hours: 2,500,000.
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
63302
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2011 / Notices
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average minutes per response: 15.
Burden hours: 125.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
control number.
Keith Tucker,
Paperwork Reduction Act Clearance Officer,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–26319 Filed 10–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services
[Document Identifier CMS–10379]
Emergency Clearance: Public
Information Collection Requirements
Submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB)
Center for Medicare and
Medicaid Services, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS), Department of Health
and Human Services, is publishing the
following summary of proposed
collections for public comment.
Interested persons are invited to send
comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including any
of the following subjects: (1) The
necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection
burden.
We are, however, requesting an
emergency review of the information
collection referenced below. In
compliance with the requirement of
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we have
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) the following
requirements for emergency review. We
are requesting an emergency review
because the collection of this
information is needed before the
expiration of the normal time limits
under OMB’s regulations at 5 CFR
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 11, 2011
Jkt 226001
1320.13. This is necessary to ensure
compliance with an initiative of the
Administration. We cannot reasonably
comply with the normal clearance
procedures in that public harm is
reasonably likely to result if normal
clearance procedures are followed as
stated in 5 CFR 1320.13(a)(2)(i). The
approval of this data collection process
is essential to ensuring that consumers
enrolled in individual and small group
association products receive the
consumer protections provided under
Section 1003 of the Affordable Care Act.
In absence of this change, a significant
number of individual and small group
rate increases for the 2012 plan year
would not be subject to the review and
public disclosure requirements of the
rate review program and, instead, would
be subject to rate increases that are
largely unregulated.
1. Type of Information Collection
Request: Revision of a currently
approved; Title of Information
Collection: Rate Increase Disclosure and
Review Reporting Requirements (45
CFR Part 154). Use: Under the Section
1003 of the Affordable Care Act (Section
2794 of the Public Health Service Act),
The Secretary, in conjunction with the
States, is required to establish a process
for the annual review, beginning with
the 2010 plan year, of unreasonable
increases in premiums for health
insurance coverage. Section 2794 directs
the Secretary to ensure the public
disclosure of information of
unreasonable rate increases and
justification for those increases.
On December 23, 2010, CMS
published a proposed rate review
regulation in the Federal Register for
public comment (Rate Increase
Disclosure and Review Rule, 75 FR
81004). CMS revised the proposed rule
based on the public comments and
published the final rate review
regulation in the Federal Register on
May 19, 2011. The final rule defines the
unreasonable rate review process and
issuer reporting and disclosure
requirements (Rate Increase Disclosure
and Review Rule, 76 FR 29964). The
regulation establishes the following
reporting requirements:
• The Preliminary Justification: This
data collection is required of all health
insurance issuers for all rate increases
that exceed the ‘‘subject to review’’’
reporting threshold as defined in the
rule. This information will be posted on
an HHS Web site.
• Rate Review Final Determination:
This data collection requires States with
effective rate review programs and CMS
to report their review findings and
unreasonable rate increase
determinations on all rate increases that
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are subject to review. This information
will be posted on an HHS Web site.
• The Final Justification for An
Unreasonable Rate Increase: This data
collection is required of health
insurance issuers that elect to
implement a rate increase that is
determined to be unreasonable based on
State or CMS review. This information
will be posted on the Health Insurance
Issuer’s Web site and on a CMS Web
site.
1. Preliminary Justification
The Preliminary Justification consists
of three parts, Part I: Rate Increase
Summary, Part II: Written Explanation
of the Rate Increase, and Part III: Rate
Filing Documentation. Issuers must
complete Parts I and II for all rate
increases that exceed the reporting
threshold as defined in the rule. As
described in the preamble of the rule,
this information would be collected to
provide consumers with basic
information on all rate increases that are
subject to review under the rate review
program.
Under the rule, ‘‘subject to review’’
rate increases would be reviewed by
either States or CMS, depending on
whether a State has an effective rate
review program. Issuers would only be
required to submit Part III of the
Preliminary Justification when CMS is
conducting the review of a rate increase
that is ‘‘subject to review.’’ Accordingly,
Part III requires health insurance issuers
to provide detailed rate data that would
be used for the purposes of conducting
thorough actuarial reviews and for
making determinations about whether
rate increases are unreasonable.
This Notice contains the following
information about the Preliminary
Justification:
• Preliminary Justification Issuer
Instructions: health insurance issuer
instructions for completing all three
parts of the Preliminary Justification.
• Part I Worksheet: a standardized
Excel worksheet that must be used to
complete Part I of the Preliminary
Justification.
• Sample internet display of the Rate
Review Consumer Disclosure:
Information provided in the Preliminary
Justification would be posted on an
HHS Web site. This sample display
shows how the information contained in
the Part I Worksheet would be displayed
to consumers.
2. Rate Review Final Determination
Under the rule, States and CMS
would have to provide a Rate Review
Final Determination at the close of their
review of all ‘‘subject to review’’ rate
increases. The Rate Review Final
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63301-63302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26319]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative
Feedback on Agency Service Delivery
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(ASPE).
ACTION: 30-Day notice of submission of information collection approval
from the Office of Management and Budget and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of a Federal Government-wide effort to streamline the
process to seek feedback from the public on service delivery, The
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE)
has submitted a Generic Information Collection Request (Generic ICR):
``Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery'' to OMB for approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.).
DATES: Comments must be submitted November 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to the OS Paperwork
Clearance Officer at Sherette.Funncoleman@hhs.gov
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information,
please contact Sherette.Funncoleman@hhs.gov or call the Reports
Clearance Office on (202) 690-6162.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Comparative Effectiveness Research Inventory.
Abstract: The information collection activity will garner
qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely
manner, in accordance with the Administration's commitment to improving
service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that
provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not
statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study. This feedback will provide
insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and
expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus
attention on areas where communication, training or changes in
operations might improve delivery of products or services. These
collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable
communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders.
It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement
of program management.
Feedback collected under this generic clearance will provide useful
information, but it will not yield data that can be generalized to the
overall population. This type of generic clearance for qualitative
information will not be used for quantitative information collections
that are designed to yield reliably actionable results, such as
monitoring trends over time or documenting program performance. Such
data uses require more rigorous designs that address: the target
population to which generalizations will be made, the sampling frame,
the sample design (including stratification and clustering), the
precision requirements or power calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate, methods for assessing
potential non-response bias, the protocols for data collection, and any
testing procedures that were or will be undertaken prior fielding the
study. Depending on the degree of influence the results are likely to
have, such collections may still be eligible for submission for other
generic mechanisms that are designed to yield quantitative results.
The Agency received no comments in response to the 60-day notice
published in the Federal Register of December 22, 2010 (75 FR 80542).
Below we provide ASPE's projected average estimates for the next
three years:
Current Actions: New collection of information.
Type of Review: Generic.
Affected Public: Individuals and Households, Businesses and
Organizations, State, Local or Tribal Government.
Average Expected Annual Number of activities: [Agency Estimate] \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 60-day notice included the following estimate of the
aggregate burden hours for this generic clearance federal-wide:
Average Expected Annual Number of activities: 25,000.
Average number of Respondents per Activity: 200.
Annual responses: 5,000,000.
Frequency of Response: Once per request.
Average minutes per response: 30.
Burden hours: 2,500,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual responses: [Agency Estimate] 500.
[[Page 63302]]
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average minutes per response: 15.
Burden hours: 125.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
Keith Tucker,
Paperwork Reduction Act Clearance Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26319 Filed 10-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P