Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 62673-62678 [2011-26113]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
This condition, if not corrected, and if
occurring while the RAT is deployed, could
result in a degraded direct current power
which is distributed to essential aeroplane
systems and therefore aeroplane operations
might be impaired.
*
*
*
*
*
Actions
(g) Within 28 months after the effective
date of this AD, replace any RAT TRU having
P/N 5913703 with a RAT TRU having P/N
5915825, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–163, dated
December 1, 2010.
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install any RAT TRU having
P/N 5913703, on any airplane.
FAA AD Differences
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to Attn:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425)
227–1149: Information may be e-mailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency Airworthiness Directive 2011–0008,
dated January 18, 2011; and Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–163, dated
December 1, 2010; for related information.
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1066; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–050–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD), for certain
Airbus Model A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C,
B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–203
airplanes and Model A300 B4–601, B4–
603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R, and F4–605R airplanes, that
would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
[FR Doc. 2011–26112 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 28, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Following the occurrence of cracks on the
MLG [main landing gear] Rib 5 RH [righthand] and LH [left-hand] attachment fitting
´ ´
lower flanges, DGAC [Direction Generale de
l’Aviation Civile] France AD 2003–318(B)
was issued to require repetitive inspections
and, as terminating action * * * [.]
Subsequently, new cases of cracks were
discovered during scheduled maintenance
checks by operators of A300B4 and A300–
600 type aeroplanes on which the
terminating action * * * [was] embodied.
This condition, if not corrected, could affect
the structural integrity of those aeroplanes.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 25,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62673
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1066; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–050–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
62674
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
On November 3, 2010, we issued AD
2010–23–26, Amendment 39–16516 (75
FR 74610, December 1, 2010). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed
above.
Since we issued AD 2010–23–26,
Amendment 39–16516 (75 FR 74610,
December 1, 2010), we have determined
that it is necessary to mandate the
optional spot-facing modification
specified in paragraph (q) of the existing
AD: The European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is the aviation
authority for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0029,
dated February 24, 2011 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Following the occurrence of cracks on the
MLG [main landing gear] Rib 5 RH [righthand] and LH [left-hand] attachment fitting
´ ´
lower flanges, DGAC [Direction Generale de
l’Aviation Civile] France AD 2003–318(B)
was issued to require repetitive inspections
and, as terminating action, the embodiment
of Airbus Service Bulletins (SB) A300–57–
0235 and A300–57–6088 * * *.
Subsequently, new cases of cracks were
discovered during scheduled maintenance
checks by operators of A300B4 and A300–
600 type aeroplanes on which the
terminating action SB’s were embodied. This
condition, if not corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of those aeroplanes.
To address and correct this condition,
Airbus developed an inspection programme
for aeroplanes modified in accordance with
SB A300–57–0235 or A300–57–6088. This
inspection programme was required to be
implemented by DGAC France AD F–2005–
113, original issue and later revision 1
[parallel to part of FAA AD 2006–12–13,
Amendment 39–14639 (71 FR 33994, June
13, 2006)].
A new EASA [European Aviation Safety
Agency] AD 2008–0111, superseding DGAC
France AD F–2005–113R1, was issued to
reduce the applicability. For aeroplanes
already compliant with DGAC France AD F–
2005–113R1, no further action was required.
Since EASA AD 2008–0111 issuance,
Airbus reviewed the inspection programmes
of SB A300–57A0246 and SB A300–57A6101
to introduce repetitive inspections including
a new inspection technique for holes 47 and
54 and to reduce inspections threshold and
intervals from 700 Flight Cycles (FC) to 400
FC until a revised terminating action is made
available.
For the reasons stated above, EASA AD
2009–0081 superseded EASA AD 2008–0111
and required operators to comply with the
new inspection programme introduced in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Revisions 3 of Airbus SB A300–57A0246 and
Airbus SB A300–57A6101.
EASA AD 2009–0081 R1 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 2010–23–26,
Amendment 39–16516 (75 FR 74610,
December 1, 2010)] has been published to
introduce an optional terminating action
which consisted of spot-facing the sensitive
holes of the MLG Rib 5 (LH and RH) bottom
flanges.
Later discussions with Airbus have
demonstrated the necessity to require the
spot-facing modification as a final solution
(no longer optional). This new [EASA] AD
retains the inspection requirements of EASA
AD 2009–0081 R1, which is superseded, and
requires the spot-facing of sensitive holes of
the MLG Rib 5 (LH and RH) bottom flanges
as terminating action.
Required actions include repairing
discrepancies (e.g., cracking or a 2nd
oversize or greater fastener hole). You
may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletins A300–57–0254, Revision 01,
including Appendix 1, dated June 14,
2011; and A300–57–6110, Revision 01,
including Appendix 1, dated June 6,
2011. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 155 products of U.S.
registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2010–23–26, Amendment 39–16516 (75
FR 74610, December 1, 2010), and
retained in this AD take about 79 workhours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work hour. Required
parts cost about $10,270 per product.
Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of the currently required actions is
$16,985 per product.
We estimate that it would take about
100 work-hours per product to comply
with the new basic requirements of this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$1,317,500, or $8,500 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2011–1066;
Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–050–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
November 25, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2010–23–26,
Amendment 39–16516 (75 FR 74610,
December 1, 2010).
*
*
*
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2000–
05–07, Amendment 39–11616 (65 FR 12077,
March 8, 2000):
Subject
Reason
[Amended]
*
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes,
certificated in any category, identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD; except
airplanes on which Airbus Modification
11912 or 11932 has been installed.
(1) Airbus Model A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C,
B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–203
airplanes.
(2) Airbus Model A300 B4–601, B4–603,
B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–622R, and
F4–605R airplanes.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–16516 (75 FR
74610, December 1, 2010) and adding
the following new AD:
*
Compliance
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
§ 39.13
of Airbus Service Bulletins (SB) A300–57–
0235 and A300–57–6088 * * *.
Subsequently, new cases of cracks were
discovered during scheduled maintenance
checks by operators of A300B4 and A300–
600 type aeroplanes on which the
terminating action SB’s were embodied. This
condition, if not corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of those aeroplanes.
Applicability
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
62675
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Following the occurrence of cracks on the
MLG [main landing gear] Rib 5 RH [righthand] and LH [left-hand] attachment fitting
´ ´
lower flanges, DGAC [Direction Generale de
l’Aviation Civile] France AD 2003–318(B)
was issued to require repetitive inspections
and, as terminating action, the embodiment
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections
(g) Perform a detailed inspection and a
high-frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection to detect cracks in Gear Rib 5 of
the main landing gear (MLG) attachment
fittings at the lower flange, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of any
applicable service bulletin listed in Table 1
and Table 2 of this AD, at the time specified
in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. After
April 12, 2000 (the effective date of AD
2000–05–07, Amendment 39–11616 (65 FR
12077, March 8, 2000)), only the service
bulletins listed in Table 2 of this AD may be
used. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 1,500 flight cycles,
until the actions specified in paragraph (i),
(j), or (l) of this AD are accomplished.
TABLE 1—REVISION 01 OF SERVICE BULLETINS
Airbus service
bulletin—
Model—
A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R and F4–605R airplanes.
A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C, B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and
B4–203 airplanes.
Revision—
Dated—
A300–57–6087
01 ...............................................................
March 11, 1998.
A300–57–0234
01 ...............................................................
March 11, 1998.
TABLE 2—OTHER REVISIONS OF SERVICE BULLETINS
Airbus service
bulletin—
Model—
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C, B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and
B4–203 airplanes.
(1) For airplanes that have accumulated
20,000 or more total flight cycles as of March
9, 1998 (the effective date of AD 98–03–06,
Amendment 39–10298 (63 FR 5224, February
2, 1998)): Inspect within 500 flight cycles
after March 9, 1998.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated—
A300–57A6087
02, including Appendix 01 .........................
June 24, 1999.
A300–57A0234
03, including Appendix 01 .........................
04, including Appendix 01 .........................
05, including Appendix 01 .........................
02 ...............................................................
May 19, 2000.
February 19, 2002.
March 10, 2008.
June 24, 1999.
03, including Appendix 01 .........................
04, including Appendix 01 .........................
05, including Appendix 01 .........................
A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R, and F4–605R airplanes.
Revision—
September 2, 1999.
May 19, 2000.
February 19, 2002.
(2) For airplanes that have accumulated
less than 20,000 total flight cycles as of
March 9, 1998: Inspect prior to the
accumulation of 18,000 total flight cycles, or
within 1,500 flight cycles after March 9,
1998, whichever occurs later.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is defined as: ‘‘An
intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
62676
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by
the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror,
magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface
cleaning and elaborate access procedures
may be required.’’
Note 2: Accomplishment of the initial
detailed and HFEC inspections prior to April
12, 2000, in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300–57A0234 or A300–57A6087,
both dated August 5, 1997, as applicable, is
considered acceptable for compliance with
the initial inspections required by paragraph
(g) of this AD.
Repair for Any Crack Found During
Inspections Required by Paragraph (g) of
This AD
(h) If any crack is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the
requirements of paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of
this AD, as applicable.
(1) If a crack is detected at one hole only,
and the crack does not extend out of the
spotface of the hole, repair in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin in Table 2 of this
AD.
(2) If a crack is detected at more than one
hole, or if any crack at any hole extends out
of the spotface of the hole, repair in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or
its delegated agent).
Terminating Modification for Repetitive
Inspections Required by Paragraphs (g) and
(j) of This AD
(i) Except as required by paragraph (l) of
this AD, prior to the accumulation of 21,000
total flight cycles, or within 2 years after
October 20, 1999 (the effective date of AD
99–19–26, Amendment 39–11313 (64 FR
49966, September 15, 1999)), whichever
occurs later: Modify Gear Rib 5 of the MLG
attachment fittings at the lower flange in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
in Table 3 of this AD. After July 18, 2006 (the
effective date of AD 2006–12–13,
Amendment 39–14639 (71 FR 33994, June
13, 2006)), only Revision 04 of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–57–6088, and
Revisions 04 and 05 of Airbus Service
Bulletin A300–57–0235 may be used.
Accomplishment of this modification
constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (j) of this AD.
TABLE 3—SERVICE BULLETINS FOR TERMINATING MODIFICATION
Airbus service
bulletin—
Model—
A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C, B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and
B4–203 airplanes.
Note 3: Accomplishment of the
modification required by paragraph (i) of this
AD prior to April 12, 2000, in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6088
or A300–57–0235, both dated August 5, 1998;
as applicable; is acceptable for compliance
with the requirements of that paragraph.
Dated—
A300–57–6088
01, including Appendix 01 .........................
February 1, 1999.
A300–57–0235
02 ...............................................................
04 ...............................................................
01, including Appendix 01 .........................
September 5, 2002.
December 3, 2003.
February 1, 1999.
03 ...............................................................
04 ...............................................................
05 ...............................................................
A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R, and F4–605R airplanes.
Revision—
September 5, 2002.
March 13, 2003.
December 3, 2003.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006–
12–13, Amendment 39–14639 (71 FR 33994,
June 13, 2006):
Additional Repetitive Inspections
(j) For airplanes on which the modification
specified in paragraph (i) or (l) of this AD has
not been done before July 18, 2006 (the
effective date of AD 2006–12–13,
Amendment 39–14639 (69 FR 54063,
September 7, 2004)), perform a detailed and
an HFEC inspection to detect cracks of the
lower flange of Gear Rib 5 of the MLG at
holes 43, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, and 54, in
accordance with the applicable service
bulletin listed in Table 4 of this AD. Perform
the inspections at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), (j)(3), or
(j)(4) of this AD. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 700 flight
cycles until the terminating modification
required by paragraph (l) of this AD is
accomplished. Accomplishment of the
inspections per paragraph (j) of this AD
terminates the inspection requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD.
TABLE 4—SERVICE BULLETINS FOR REPETITIVE INSPECTIONS
Airbus service
bulletin—
Model—
Revision—
Dated—
A300–57A6087
04, including Appendix 01 .........................
February 19, 2002.
A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C, B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and
B4–203 airplanes.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R, and F4–605R airplanes.
A300–57A0234
05, including Appendix 01 .........................
05, including Appendix 01 .........................
March 10, 2008.
February 19, 2002.
(1) For Model A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C, B2–
203, B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–203 airplanes;
and Model A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620,
B4–622, B4–605R, B4–622R, and F4–605R
airplanes that have accumulated 18,000 or
more total flight cycles as of July 18, 2006:
Within 700 flight cycles after July 18, 2006.
(2) For Model A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C, and
B2–203 airplanes that have accumulated less
than 18,000 total flight cycles as of July 18,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
2006: Prior to the accumulation of 18,000
total flight cycles, or within 700 flight cycles
after July 18, 2006, whichever occurs later.
(3) For Model A300 B4–2C, B4–103, and
B4–203 airplanes that have accumulated less
than 18,000 total flight cycles as of July 18,
2006: Prior to the accumulation of 14,500
total flight cycles, or within 700 flight cycles
after July 18, 2006, whichever occurs later.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) For Model A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–
620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–622R, and F4–
605R airplanes that have accumulated less
than 18,000 total flight cycles as of July 18,
2006: Prior to the accumulation of 11,600
total flight cycles, or within 700 flight cycles
after July 18, 2006, whichever occurs later.
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Crack Repair
(k) If any crack is detected during any
inspection required by paragraph (j) of this
AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the
requirements of paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2)
of this AD, as applicable.
(1) If a crack is detected at only one hole,
and the crack does not extend out of the
spotface of the hole, repair in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57A0234,
Revision 05, including Appendix 01, dated
February 19, 2002 (for Model A300 B2–1C,
B2K–3C, B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–
203 airplanes); or A300–57A6087, Revision
04, including Appendix 01, dated February
19, 2002; or A300–57A6087, Revision 05,
dated March 10, 2008 (for Model A300 B4–
601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R, and F4–605R airplanes); as applicable.
(2) If a crack is detected at more than one
hole, or if any crack at any hole extends out
of the spotface of the hole, repair in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, or
the EASA (or its delegated agent).
Terminating Modification for Repetitive
Inspections Required by Paragraphs (g) and
(j) of This AD for Certain Airplanes
(l) For airplanes on which the terminating
modification in paragraph (i) of this AD has
62677
not been accomplished before July 18, 2006:
At the earlier of the times specified in
paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2) of this AD, modify
Gear Rib 5 of the MLG attachment fittings at
the lower flange. Except as provided by
paragraph (m) of this AD, do the modification
in accordance with the applicable service
bulletin in Table 5 of this AD. This action
terminates the repetitive inspections
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (j) of this
AD.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 21,000
total flight cycles, or within 2 years after
October 20, 1999, whichever is later.
(2) Within 16 months after July 18, 2006.
TABLE 5—SERVICE BULLETINS FOR TERMINATING MODIFICATION
Airbus service
bulletin—
Model—
(m) Where the applicable service bulletin
specified in paragraph (l) of this AD specifies
to contact Airbus for modification
instructions; or if there is a previously
installed repair at any of the affected fastener
holes; or if a crack is found when
accomplishing the modification: Prior to
further flight, modify in accordance with a
Dated—
A300–57–6088
04 ...............................................................
December 3, 2003.
A300–57–0235
04 ...............................................................
March 13, 2003.
05 ...............................................................
A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R and F4–605R airplanes.
A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C, B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and
B4–203 airplanes.
Revision—
December 3, 2003.
method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, or the
EASA (or its delegated agent).
Actions Accomplished per Previous Issues of
Service Bulletins
(n) Actions accomplished before July 18,
2006, in accordance with the service
bulletins listed in Table 6 of this AD, are
considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding action specified in
paragraphs (g) through (m) of this AD.
TABLE 6—PREVIOUS ISSUES OF SERVICE BULLETINS
Airbus service bulletin—
Revision—
Dated—
A300–57–0235 ......................................................................
02,
03
02
03
September 27, 1999.
September 5, 2002.
September 5, 2000.
March 13, 2003.
A300–57–6088 ......................................................................
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
No Reporting
(o) Although the service bulletins
identified in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of this
AD specify to submit certain information to
the manufacturer, this AD does not include
such a requirement.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2010–
23–26, Amendment 39–16516 (75 FR 74610,
December 1, 2010), with Certain Service
Information Required after the Effective Date
of This AD:
Actions and Compliance
(p) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (p)(2) of this AD, perform a
detailed inspection for cracking at the
locations specified in paragraphs (p)(1)(i),
(p)(1)(ii), and (p)(1)(iii) of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300–57A0246, Revision 03, dated
March 11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated
September 9, 2009; or Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300–57A6101, Revision 03,
dated March 11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
including Appendix 01 ....................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
September 9, 2009; as applicable. As of the
effective date of this AD only Revision 04 of
these service bulletins may be used.
(i) The bottom flange and vertical web in
the area between the wing rear spar/gear Rib
5 attachment and the forward reaction-rod
pick-up lug.
(ii) On the inboard side, around the
fastener holes at locations 43, 47 to 50, 52,
and 54.
(iii) On the outboard side, the lower flange,
the vertical web and around the fastener
holes at locations 43, 47 to 50, 52 and 54.
(2) Do the inspection required by
paragraph (p)(1) of this AD at the later of the
times in paragraphs (p)(2)(i) and (p)(2)(ii) of
this AD.
(i) Within 400 flight cycles after the
accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraph (i) or (l) of this AD, as applicable.
(ii) Within 400 flight cycles or 4 months
after January 5, 2011 (the effective date of AD
2010–23–26, Amendment 39–16516 (75 FR
74610, December 1, 2010)), whichever occurs
first.
(3) If no cracking is detected during the
inspection required by paragraph (p)(1) of
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
this AD, before further flight, perform a
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) at
holes location 47 and 54, in the right-hand
and left-hand MLG Rib 5 attachment fitting
lower flange, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57A0246,
Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009, or
Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–
57A6101, Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009,
or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; as
applicable. As of the effective date of this
AD, only Revision 04 of these service
bulletins may be used.
(4) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed
400 flight cycles, repeat the detailed and FPI
inspections, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57A0246,
Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009, or
Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–
57A6101, Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009,
or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; as
applicable; until the terminating action
required by paragraph (q) of this AD has been
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
62678
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
accomplished. As of the effective date of this
AD, only Revision 04 of these service
bulletins may be used.
(5) If any crack is detected during any of
the inspections required by paragraphs (p)(1),
(p)(3), and (p)(4) of this AD, and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57A0246,
Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009, or
Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–
57A6101, Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009,
or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009;
recommends contacting Airbus for
appropriate action: Before further flight,
contact Airbus for a repair solution, and do
the repair; or repair the cracking using a
method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, or EASA or its
delegated agent. As of the effective date of
this AD, only Revision 04 of these service
bulletins may be used.
New Requirements of This AD:
applicable. Accomplishing this modification
terminates the repetitive inspection
requirements of paragraph (p)(4) of this AD.
Terminating Action
(q) Within 30 months after the effective
date of this AD: Modify the spot-faces around
all the fastener holes at locations 43, 47 to
50, 52, and 54 (except for spot-faces of holes
which have been previously repaired) on the
bottom flange MLG ribs, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57–0254,
Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated
June 14, 2011; or Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300–57–6110, Revision 01,
including Appendix 1, dated June 6, 2011; as
(s) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(r) Modifying the spot-faces before the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57–0254,
dated June 4, 2010; or Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300–57–6110, dated June
7, 2010; as applicable; is considered
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (q) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 4: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–2125; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD. AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2000–05–07,
Amendment 39–11616 (65 FR 12077, March
8, 2000); AD 2006–12–13, Amendment 39–
14639 (69 FR 54063, September 7, 2004); and
AD 2010–23–26, Amendment 39–16516 (75
FR 74610, December 1, 2010), are approved
as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions
of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
(t) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2011–0029, dated February 24,
2011; and the service information specified
in Table 7 of this AD, for related information.
TABLE 7—RELATED SERVICE INFORMATION
Airbus—
Revision—
Dated—
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57A0246 .........................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57–0254 ..........................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57A6101 .........................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–57–6110 ..........................
Service Bulletin A300–57A0234 ............................................
04, including Appendices 1 and 2 .......................................
01 .........................................................................................
04, including Appendices 1 and 2 .......................................
01 .........................................................................................
02 .........................................................................................
03, including Appendix 01 ...................................................
04, including Appendix 01 ...................................................
05, including Appendix 01 ...................................................
02, including Appendix 01 ...................................................
03, including Appendix 01 ...................................................
04, including Appendix 01 ...................................................
05, including Appendix 01 ...................................................
04 .........................................................................................
05 .........................................................................................
04 .........................................................................................
September 9, 2009.
June 14, 2011.
September 9, 2009.
June 6, 2011.
June 24, 1999.
September 2, 1999.
May 19, 2000.
February 19, 2002.
June 24, 1999.
May 19, 2000.
February 19, 2002.
March 10, 2008.
March 13, 2003.
December 3, 2003.
December 3, 2003.
Service Bulletin A300–57A6087 ............................................
Service Bulletin A300–57–0235 ............................................
Service Bulletin A300–57–6088 ............................................
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
ACTION:
16 CFR Chapter II
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2011–26113 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 30, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[Docket No. CPSC–2011–0074]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Table Saw Blade Contact Injuries;
Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking; Request for Comments
and Information
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’
or ‘‘we’’) is considering whether a new
performance safety standard is needed
to address an unreasonable risk of injury
associated with table saws. We are
conducting this proceeding under the
authority of the Consumer Product
Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’), 15 U.S.C. 2051–
2084. This advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (‘‘ANPR’’) invites written
comments from interested persons
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62673-62678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26113]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1066; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-050-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD), for
certain Airbus Model A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-
203 airplanes and Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, B4-605R,
B4-622R, and F4-605R airplanes, that would supersede an existing AD.
This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Following the occurrence of cracks on the MLG [main landing
gear] Rib 5 RH [right-hand] and LH [left-hand] attachment fitting
lower flanges, DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation
Civile] France AD 2003-318(B) was issued to require repetitive
inspections and, as terminating action * * * [.]
Subsequently, new cases of cracks were discovered during
scheduled maintenance checks by operators of A300B4 and A300-600
type aeroplanes on which the terminating action * * * [was]
embodied. This condition, if not corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of those aeroplanes.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 25,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1066;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-050-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
[[Page 62674]]
personal information you provide. We will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this
proposed AD.
Discussion
On November 3, 2010, we issued AD 2010-23-26, Amendment 39-16516
(75 FR 74610, December 1, 2010). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
Since we issued AD 2010-23-26, Amendment 39-16516 (75 FR 74610,
December 1, 2010), we have determined that it is necessary to mandate
the optional spot-facing modification specified in paragraph (q) of the
existing AD: The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
aviation authority for the Member States of the European Community, has
issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011-0029, dated February 24, 2011
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
Following the occurrence of cracks on the MLG [main landing
gear] Rib 5 RH [right-hand] and LH [left-hand] attachment fitting
lower flanges, DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation
Civile] France AD 2003-318(B) was issued to require repetitive
inspections and, as terminating action, the embodiment of Airbus
Service Bulletins (SB) A300-57-0235 and A300-57-6088 * * *.
Subsequently, new cases of cracks were discovered during
scheduled maintenance checks by operators of A300B4 and A300-600
type aeroplanes on which the terminating action SB's were embodied.
This condition, if not corrected, could affect the structural
integrity of those aeroplanes.
To address and correct this condition, Airbus developed an
inspection programme for aeroplanes modified in accordance with SB
A300-57-0235 or A300-57-6088. This inspection programme was required
to be implemented by DGAC France AD F-2005-113, original issue and
later revision 1 [parallel to part of FAA AD 2006-12-13, Amendment
39-14639 (71 FR 33994, June 13, 2006)].
A new EASA [European Aviation Safety Agency] AD 2008-0111,
superseding DGAC France AD F-2005-113R1, was issued to reduce the
applicability. For aeroplanes already compliant with DGAC France AD
F-2005-113R1, no further action was required.
Since EASA AD 2008-0111 issuance, Airbus reviewed the inspection
programmes of SB A300-57A0246 and SB A300-57A6101 to introduce
repetitive inspections including a new inspection technique for
holes 47 and 54 and to reduce inspections threshold and intervals
from 700 Flight Cycles (FC) to 400 FC until a revised terminating
action is made available.
For the reasons stated above, EASA AD 2009-0081 superseded EASA
AD 2008-0111 and required operators to comply with the new
inspection programme introduced in Revisions 3 of Airbus SB A300-
57A0246 and Airbus SB A300-57A6101.
EASA AD 2009-0081 R1 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2010-23-26,
Amendment 39-16516 (75 FR 74610, December 1, 2010)] has been
published to introduce an optional terminating action which
consisted of spot-facing the sensitive holes of the MLG Rib 5 (LH
and RH) bottom flanges.
Later discussions with Airbus have demonstrated the necessity to
require the spot-facing modification as a final solution (no longer
optional). This new [EASA] AD retains the inspection requirements of
EASA AD 2009-0081 R1, which is superseded, and requires the spot-
facing of sensitive holes of the MLG Rib 5 (LH and RH) bottom
flanges as terminating action.
Required actions include repairing discrepancies (e.g., cracking or a
2nd oversize or greater fastener hole). You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletins A300-57-0254,
Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated June 14, 2011; and A300-57-
6110, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated June 6, 2011. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 155 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2010-23-26, Amendment 39-16516
(75 FR 74610, December 1, 2010), and retained in this AD take about 79
work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour.
Required parts cost about $10,270 per product. Based on these figures,
the estimated cost of the currently required actions is $16,985 per
product.
We estimate that it would take about 100 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $1,317,500, or
$8,500 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
[[Page 62675]]
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-16516 (75 FR
74610, December 1, 2010) and adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2011-1066; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-
050-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by November 25, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2010-23-26, Amendment 39-16516 (75 FR
74610, December 1, 2010).
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes, certificated in any
category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD;
except airplanes on which Airbus Modification 11912 or 11932 has
been installed.
(1) Airbus Model A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and
B4-203 airplanes.
(2) Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, B4-605R,
B4-622R, and F4-605R airplanes.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Following the occurrence of cracks on the MLG [main landing
gear] Rib 5 RH [right-hand] and LH [left-hand] attachment fitting
lower flanges, DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation
Civile] France AD 2003-318(B) was issued to require repetitive
inspections and, as terminating action, the embodiment of Airbus
Service Bulletins (SB) A300-57-0235 and A300-57-6088 * * *.
Subsequently, new cases of cracks were discovered during
scheduled maintenance checks by operators of A300B4 and A300-600
type aeroplanes on which the terminating action SB's were embodied.
This condition, if not corrected, could affect the structural
integrity of those aeroplanes.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2000-05-07, Amendment 39-11616 (65 FR
12077, March 8, 2000):
Repetitive Inspections
(g) Perform a detailed inspection and a high-frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracks in Gear Rib 5 of the main
landing gear (MLG) attachment fittings at the lower flange, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of any applicable
service bulletin listed in Table 1 and Table 2 of this AD, at the
time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. After April
12, 2000 (the effective date of AD 2000-05-07, Amendment 39-11616
(65 FR 12077, March 8, 2000)), only the service bulletins listed in
Table 2 of this AD may be used. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 1,500 flight cycles, until the actions
specified in paragraph (i), (j), or (l) of this AD are accomplished.
Table 1--Revision 01 of Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service
Model-- bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, A300-57-6087 01.................... March 11, 1998.
B4-605R, B4-622R and F4-605R
airplanes.
A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, A300-57-0234 01.................... March 11, 1998.
B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Other Revisions of Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service
Model-- bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, A300-57A6087 02, including Appendix June 24, 1999.
B4-605R, B4-622R, and F4-605R 01.
airplanes.
03, including Appendix May 19, 2000.
01.
04, including Appendix February 19, 2002.
01.
05, including Appendix March 10, 2008.
01.
A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, A300-57A0234 02.................... June 24, 1999.
B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes.
03, including Appendix September 2, 1999.
01.
04, including Appendix May 19, 2000.
01.
05, including Appendix February 19, 2002.
01.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) For airplanes that have accumulated 20,000 or more total
flight cycles as of March 9, 1998 (the effective date of AD 98-03-
06, Amendment 39-10298 (63 FR 5224, February 2, 1998)): Inspect
within 500 flight cycles after March 9, 1998.
(2) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 20,000 total
flight cycles as of March 9, 1998: Inspect prior to the accumulation
of 18,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,500 flight cycles after
March 9, 1998, whichever occurs later.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is
defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific
structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage,
failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
[[Page 62676]]
lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be
used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be
required.''
Note 2: Accomplishment of the initial detailed and HFEC
inspections prior to April 12, 2000, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-57A0234 or A300-57A6087, both dated August 5,
1997, as applicable, is considered acceptable for compliance with
the initial inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
Repair for Any Crack Found During Inspections Required by Paragraph (g)
of This AD
(h) If any crack is detected during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the
requirements of paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) If a crack is detected at one hole only, and the crack does
not extend out of the spotface of the hole, repair in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service
bulletin in Table 2 of this AD.
(2) If a crack is detected at more than one hole, or if any
crack at any hole extends out of the spotface of the hole, repair in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent).
Terminating Modification for Repetitive Inspections Required by
Paragraphs (g) and (j) of This AD
(i) Except as required by paragraph (l) of this AD, prior to the
accumulation of 21,000 total flight cycles, or within 2 years after
October 20, 1999 (the effective date of AD 99-19-26, Amendment 39-
11313 (64 FR 49966, September 15, 1999)), whichever occurs later:
Modify Gear Rib 5 of the MLG attachment fittings at the lower flange
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin in Table 3 of this AD. After July 18, 2006 (the
effective date of AD 2006-12-13, Amendment 39-14639 (71 FR 33994,
June 13, 2006)), only Revision 04 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-
57-6088, and Revisions 04 and 05 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-
0235 may be used. Accomplishment of this modification constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (j) of this AD.
Table 3--Service Bulletins for Terminating Modification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service
Model-- bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, A300-57-6088 01, including Appendix February 1, 1999.
B4-605R, B4-622R, and F4-605R 01.
airplanes.
02.................... September 5, 2002.
04.................... December 3, 2003.
A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, A300-57-0235 01, including Appendix February 1, 1999.
B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes. 01.
03.................... September 5, 2002.
04.................... March 13, 2003.
05.................... December 3, 2003.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 3: Accomplishment of the modification required by paragraph
(i) of this AD prior to April 12, 2000, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-57-6088 or A300-57-0235, both dated August 5,
1998; as applicable; is acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of that paragraph.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006-12-13, Amendment 39-14639 (71 FR
33994, June 13, 2006):
Additional Repetitive Inspections
(j) For airplanes on which the modification specified in
paragraph (i) or (l) of this AD has not been done before July 18,
2006 (the effective date of AD 2006-12-13, Amendment 39-14639 (69 FR
54063, September 7, 2004)), perform a detailed and an HFEC
inspection to detect cracks of the lower flange of Gear Rib 5 of the
MLG at holes 43, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, and 54, in accordance with the
applicable service bulletin listed in Table 4 of this AD. Perform
the inspections at the applicable time specified in paragraph
(j)(1), (j)(2), (j)(3), or (j)(4) of this AD. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 700 flight cycles until the
terminating modification required by paragraph (l) of this AD is
accomplished. Accomplishment of the inspections per paragraph (j) of
this AD terminates the inspection requirements of paragraph (g) of
this AD.
Table 4--Service Bulletins for Repetitive Inspections
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service
Model-- bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, A300-57A6087 04, including Appendix February 19, 2002.
B4-605R, B4-622R, and F4-605R 01.
airplanes.
05, including Appendix March 10, 2008.
01.
A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, A300-57A0234 05, including Appendix February 19, 2002.
B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes. 01.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) For Model A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-
203 airplanes; and Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, B4-
605R, B4-622R, and F4-605R airplanes that have accumulated 18,000 or
more total flight cycles as of July 18, 2006: Within 700 flight
cycles after July 18, 2006.
(2) For Model A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, and B2-203 airplanes that have
accumulated less than 18,000 total flight cycles as of July 18,
2006: Prior to the accumulation of 18,000 total flight cycles, or
within 700 flight cycles after July 18, 2006, whichever occurs
later.
(3) For Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes that have
accumulated less than 18,000 total flight cycles as of July 18,
2006: Prior to the accumulation of 14,500 total flight cycles, or
within 700 flight cycles after July 18, 2006, whichever occurs
later.
(4) For Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, B4-605R, B4-
622R, and F4-605R airplanes that have accumulated less than 18,000
total flight cycles as of July 18, 2006: Prior to the accumulation
of 11,600 total flight cycles, or within 700 flight cycles after
July 18, 2006, whichever occurs later.
[[Page 62677]]
Crack Repair
(k) If any crack is detected during any inspection required by
paragraph (j) of this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish the
requirements of paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) If a crack is detected at only one hole, and the crack does
not extend out of the spotface of the hole, repair in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57A0234, Revision 05, including
Appendix 01, dated February 19, 2002 (for Model A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C,
B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes); or A300-57A6087,
Revision 04, including Appendix 01, dated February 19, 2002; or
A300-57A6087, Revision 05, dated March 10, 2008 (for Model A300 B4-
601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, B4-605R, B4-622R, and F4-605R
airplanes); as applicable.
(2) If a crack is detected at more than one hole, or if any
crack at any hole extends out of the spotface of the hole, repair in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, or the EASA (or its delegated agent).
Terminating Modification for Repetitive Inspections Required by
Paragraphs (g) and (j) of This AD for Certain Airplanes
(l) For airplanes on which the terminating modification in
paragraph (i) of this AD has not been accomplished before July 18,
2006: At the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs (l)(1) and
(l)(2) of this AD, modify Gear Rib 5 of the MLG attachment fittings
at the lower flange. Except as provided by paragraph (m) of this AD,
do the modification in accordance with the applicable service
bulletin in Table 5 of this AD. This action terminates the
repetitive inspections requirements of paragraphs (g) and (j) of
this AD.
(1) Prior to the accumulation of 21,000 total flight cycles, or
within 2 years after October 20, 1999, whichever is later.
(2) Within 16 months after July 18, 2006.
Table 5--Service Bulletins for Terminating Modification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service
Model-- bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, A300-57-6088 04.................... December 3, 2003.
B4-605R, B4-622R and F4-605R
airplanes.
A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, A300-57-0235 04.................... March 13, 2003.
B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes.
05.................... December 3, 2003.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(m) Where the applicable service bulletin specified in paragraph
(l) of this AD specifies to contact Airbus for modification
instructions; or if there is a previously installed repair at any of
the affected fastener holes; or if a crack is found when
accomplishing the modification: Prior to further flight, modify in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, or the EASA (or its delegated agent).
Actions Accomplished per Previous Issues of Service Bulletins
(n) Actions accomplished before July 18, 2006, in accordance
with the service bulletins listed in Table 6 of this AD, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action
specified in paragraphs (g) through (m) of this AD.
Table 6--Previous Issues of Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300-57-0235............................. 02, including Appendix 01... September 27, 1999.
03.......................... September 5, 2002.
A300-57-6088............................. 02.......................... September 5, 2000.
03.......................... March 13, 2003.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Reporting
(o) Although the service bulletins identified in Tables 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, and 6 of this AD specify to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include such a requirement.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2010-23-26, Amendment 39-16516
(75 FR 74610, December 1, 2010), with Certain Service Information
Required after the Effective Date of This AD:
Actions and Compliance
(p) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (p)(2) of this
AD, perform a detailed inspection for cracking at the locations
specified in paragraphs (p)(1)(i), (p)(1)(ii), and (p)(1)(iii) of
this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A0246, Revision 03, dated
March 11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; or Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A6101, Revision 03, dated March
11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; as applicable. As
of the effective date of this AD only Revision 04 of these service
bulletins may be used.
(i) The bottom flange and vertical web in the area between the
wing rear spar/gear Rib 5 attachment and the forward reaction-rod
pick-up lug.
(ii) On the inboard side, around the fastener holes at locations
43, 47 to 50, 52, and 54.
(iii) On the outboard side, the lower flange, the vertical web
and around the fastener holes at locations 43, 47 to 50, 52 and 54.
(2) Do the inspection required by paragraph (p)(1) of this AD at
the later of the times in paragraphs (p)(2)(i) and (p)(2)(ii) of
this AD.
(i) Within 400 flight cycles after the accomplishment of the
actions required by paragraph (i) or (l) of this AD, as applicable.
(ii) Within 400 flight cycles or 4 months after January 5, 2011
(the effective date of AD 2010-23-26, Amendment 39-16516 (75 FR
74610, December 1, 2010)), whichever occurs first.
(3) If no cracking is detected during the inspection required by
paragraph (p)(1) of this AD, before further flight, perform a
fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) at holes location 47 and 54,
in the right-hand and left-hand MLG Rib 5 attachment fitting lower
flange, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A0246, Revision 03, dated March
11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; or Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A6101, Revision 03, dated March
11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; as applicable. As
of the effective date of this AD, only Revision 04 of these service
bulletins may be used.
(4) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 400 flight cycles,
repeat the detailed and FPI inspections, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-57A0246, Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009, or Revision 04,
dated September 9, 2009; or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-
57A6101, Revision 03, dated March 11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated
September 9, 2009; as applicable; until the terminating action
required by paragraph (q) of this AD has been
[[Page 62678]]
accomplished. As of the effective date of this AD, only Revision 04
of these service bulletins may be used.
(5) If any crack is detected during any of the inspections
required by paragraphs (p)(1), (p)(3), and (p)(4) of this AD, and
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A0246, Revision 03, dated
March 11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; or Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A6101, Revision 03, dated March
11, 2009, or Revision 04, dated September 9, 2009; recommends
contacting Airbus for appropriate action: Before further flight,
contact Airbus for a repair solution, and do the repair; or repair
the cracking using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, or EASA or its
delegated agent. As of the effective date of this AD, only Revision
04 of these service bulletins may be used.
New Requirements of This AD:
Terminating Action
(q) Within 30 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
the spot-faces around all the fastener holes at locations 43, 47 to
50, 52, and 54 (except for spot-faces of holes which have been
previously repaired) on the bottom flange MLG ribs, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300-57-0254, Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated June
14, 2011; or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57-6110,
Revision 01, including Appendix 1, dated June 6, 2011; as
applicable. Accomplishing this modification terminates the
repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (p)(4) of this AD.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(r) Modifying the spot-faces before the effective date of this
AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57-0254, dated June 4, 2010; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57-6110, dated June 7, 2010;
as applicable; is considered acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (q) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 4: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(s) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Information may be e-mailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD. AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2000-05-07, Amendment 39-11616 (65 FR 12077,
March 8, 2000); AD 2006-12-13, Amendment 39-14639 (69 FR 54063,
September 7, 2004); and AD 2010-23-26, Amendment 39-16516 (75 FR
74610, December 1, 2010), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(t) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011-0029, dated
February 24, 2011; and the service information specified in Table 7
of this AD, for related information.
Table 7--Related Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus-- Revision-- Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A0246. 04, including Appendices 1 and September 9, 2009.
2.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57-0254. 01............................. June 14, 2011.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A6101. 04, including Appendices 1 and September 9, 2009.
2.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57-6110. 01............................. June 6, 2011.
Service Bulletin A300-57A0234........... 02............................. June 24, 1999.
03, including Appendix 01...... September 2, 1999.
04, including Appendix 01...... May 19, 2000.
05, including Appendix 01...... February 19, 2002.
Service Bulletin A300-57A6087........... 02, including Appendix 01...... June 24, 1999.
03, including Appendix 01...... May 19, 2000.
04, including Appendix 01...... February 19, 2002.
05, including Appendix 01...... March 10, 2008.
Service Bulletin A300-57-0235........... 04............................. March 13, 2003.
05............................. December 3, 2003.
Service Bulletin A300-57-6088........... 04............................. December 3, 2003.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 30, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-26113 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P