Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X Airplanes, 62671-62673 [2011-26112]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the
Bombardier Challenger 300 BD–100 Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks Manual. When
this TR has been included in the general
revisions of Section 5–10–40, ‘‘Certification
Maintenance Requirements,’’ of Part 2,
‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ of the
Bombardier Challenger 300 BD–100 Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks Manual, the
general revisions may be inserted in Section
5–10–40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance
Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness
Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger
300 BD–100 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks Manual, provided that the relevant
information in the general revision is
identical to that in Bombardier TR 5–2–59,
dated November 25, 2010, to Section 5–10–
40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance
Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness
Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger
300 BD–100 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks Manual.
No Alternative Actions or Intervals
(i) After accomplishing the revision
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD,
no alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or
intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
No differences.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA) Airworthiness Directive
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 30, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–26111 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1061; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–053–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Aviation Model FALCON 7X Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
Other FAA AD Provisions
(j) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
CF–2011–05, dated March 24, 2011; and
Bombardier Temporary Revision 5–2–59,
dated November 25, 2010, to Section 5–10–
40, ‘‘Certification Maintenance
Requirements,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness
Limitations,’’ of the Bombardier Challenger
300 BD–100 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks Manual; for related information.
The manufacturer of the Transformer
Rectifier Unit (TRU) part of the Ram Air
Turbine (RAT) system has identified an
incorrect design of the part.
*
*
*
*
*
This condition, if not corrected, and if
occurring while the RAT is deployed, could
result in a degraded direct current power
which is distributed to essential aeroplane
systems and therefore aeroplane operations
might be impaired.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 25,
2011.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62671
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Dassault
Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South
Hackensack, New Jersey 07606;
telephone 201–440–6700; Internet
https://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1061; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–053–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
62672
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0008,
dated January 18, 2011 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
The manufacturer of the Transformer
Rectifier Unit (TRU) part of the Ram Air
Turbine (RAT) system has identified an
incorrect design of the part.
The internal wiring that conducts the high
voltage alternative current from the RAT
generator may become loose due to
insufficient crimping of the wire and
contacts.
This condition, if not corrected, and if
occurring while the RAT is deployed, could
result in a degraded direct current power
which is distributed to essential aeroplane
systems and therefore aeroplane operations
might be impaired.
To address this unsafe condition, the
manufacturer of the RAT TRU has developed
an improved RAT TRU with a new Part
Number (P/N).
This [EASA] AD requires replacement of
the affected RAT TRU by a modified RAT
TRU.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Dassault Aviation has issued
Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–163,
dated December 1, 2010. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 27 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 13 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $16,310 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these parts. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$470,205, or $17,415 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA–2011–
1061; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–
053–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
November 25, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Aviation
Model FALCON 7X airplanes, all serial
numbers, certificated in any category;
equipped with any Ram Air Turbine (RAT)
Transformer Rectifier Unit (TRU) having part
number (P/N) 5913703.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24: Electrical Power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
The manufacturer of the Transformer
Rectifier Unit (TRU) part of the Ram Air
Turbine (RAT) system has identified an
incorrect design of the part.
*
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
*
*
11OCP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
This condition, if not corrected, and if
occurring while the RAT is deployed, could
result in a degraded direct current power
which is distributed to essential aeroplane
systems and therefore aeroplane operations
might be impaired.
*
*
*
*
*
Actions
(g) Within 28 months after the effective
date of this AD, replace any RAT TRU having
P/N 5913703 with a RAT TRU having P/N
5915825, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–163, dated
December 1, 2010.
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install any RAT TRU having
P/N 5913703, on any airplane.
FAA AD Differences
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to Attn:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425)
227–1149: Information may be e-mailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency Airworthiness Directive 2011–0008,
dated January 18, 2011; and Dassault
Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X–163, dated
December 1, 2010; for related information.
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1066; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–050–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD), for certain
Airbus Model A300 B2–1C, B2K–3C,
B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–203
airplanes and Model A300 B4–601, B4–
603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R, B4–
622R, and F4–605R airplanes, that
would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
17:42 Oct 07, 2011
[FR Doc. 2011–26112 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 28, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Following the occurrence of cracks on the
MLG [main landing gear] Rib 5 RH [righthand] and LH [left-hand] attachment fitting
´ ´
lower flanges, DGAC [Direction Generale de
l’Aviation Civile] France AD 2003–318(B)
was issued to require repetitive inspections
and, as terminating action * * * [.]
Subsequently, new cases of cracks were
discovered during scheduled maintenance
checks by operators of A300B4 and A300–
600 type aeroplanes on which the
terminating action * * * [was] embodied.
This condition, if not corrected, could affect
the structural integrity of those aeroplanes.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 25,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
62673
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–1066; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–050–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
E:\FR\FM\11OCP1.SGM
11OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62671-62673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26112]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-1061; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-053-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
The manufacturer of the Transformer Rectifier Unit (TRU) part of
the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) system has identified an incorrect design
of the part.
* * * * *
This condition, if not corrected, and if occurring while the RAT
is deployed, could result in a degraded direct current power which
is distributed to essential aeroplane systems and therefore
aeroplane operations might be impaired.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 25,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606;
telephone 201-440-6700; Internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1061;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-053-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
[[Page 62672]]
personal information you provide. We will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this
proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0008, dated January 18, 2011 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
The manufacturer of the Transformer Rectifier Unit (TRU) part of
the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) system has identified an incorrect design
of the part.
The internal wiring that conducts the high voltage alternative
current from the RAT generator may become loose due to insufficient
crimping of the wire and contacts.
This condition, if not corrected, and if occurring while the RAT
is deployed, could result in a degraded direct current power which
is distributed to essential aeroplane systems and therefore
aeroplane operations might be impaired.
To address this unsafe condition, the manufacturer of the RAT
TRU has developed an improved RAT TRU with a new Part Number (P/N).
This [EASA] AD requires replacement of the affected RAT TRU by a
modified RAT TRU.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Dassault Aviation has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X-163,
dated December 1, 2010. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 27 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 13 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $16,310 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $470,205, or $17,415 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2011-1061; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-053-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by November 25, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 7X
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category;
equipped with any Ram Air Turbine (RAT) Transformer Rectifier Unit
(TRU) having part number (P/N) 5913703.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical Power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
The manufacturer of the Transformer Rectifier Unit (TRU) part of
the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) system has identified an incorrect design
of the part.
* * * * *
[[Page 62673]]
This condition, if not corrected, and if occurring while the RAT
is deployed, could result in a degraded direct current power which
is distributed to essential aeroplane systems and therefore
aeroplane operations might be impaired.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Within 28 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace any RAT TRU having P/N 5913703 with a RAT TRU having P/N
5915825, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Dassault Mandatory Service Bulletin 7X-163, dated December 1, 2010.
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
any RAT TRU having P/N 5913703, on any airplane.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to Attn: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149: Information may be e-mailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2011-0008, dated January 18, 2011; and Dassault Mandatory
Service Bulletin 7X-163, dated December 1, 2010; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 28, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-26112 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P