Notice of Public Hearing and Request for Comments on the Study of Prior User Rights, 62388-62389 [2011-26154]
Download as PDF
62388
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Notices
and 2⁄3 of the paraprofessional rate of
$122 per hour, the estimated rate for
respondents to this collection is
approximately $194 per hour. Using this
estimated rate of $194 per hour, the
USPTO estimates that the respondent
cost burden for submitting the
information in this collection will be
approximately $191,866 per year.
Estimated time
for
response
(minutes)
Item
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual
burden
hours
Application for Public User ID (Online Access Card) (PTO–2030) .............................................
Issue Online Access Card ...........................................................................................................
Renew Online Access Card ........................................................................................................
Replace Online Access Card ......................................................................................................
User Training Registration Forms ...............................................................................................
Security Identification Badges for Public Users (PTO–2224) .....................................................
Renew Security Identification Badges for Public Users ..............................................................
Replace Security Identification Badge .........................................................................................
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
2,330
2,095
1,059
145
74
1,000
3,200
100
186
356
85
12
6
80
256
8
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
........................
10,003
989
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $1,502. This
collection has annual (non-hour) costs
in the form of fees and postage costs.
There are no application or renewal
fees for online access cards or security
identification badges. However, there is
a $15 fee for issuing a replacement
security identification badge. The
USPTO estimates that it will reissue
approximately 100 security badges
annually that have been lost, stolen, or
need to be replaced, for a total of $1,500
per year in fees.
Users may incur postage costs when
submitting a user training registration
form to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO
expects that approximately 4 of the
estimated 74 training forms received per
year will be submitted by mail. The
USPTO estimates that the average firstclass postage cost for a mailed training
form will be 44 cents, for a total postage
cost of approximately $2 per year for
this collection.
The total annual (non-hour)
respondent cost burden for this
collection in the form of fees and
postage costs is estimated to be $1,502
per year.
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: October 4, 2011.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–26014 Filed 10–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2011–0060]
Notice of Public Hearing and Request
for Comments on the Study of Prior
User Rights
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is interested
in gathering information on patent prior
user rights for purposes of preparing a
report on the subject as required by the
America Invents Act. In particular, the
USPTO seeks information about the
following as specified in the America
Invents Act: (1) Comparison(s) between
the patent laws of the United States and
the laws of other industrialized
countries; (2) the effect of prior user
rights on innovation rates; (3) the
correlation, if any, between prior user
rights and start-up enterprises as well as
the ability to attract venture capital to
start new companies; (4) the effect of
prior user rights, if any, on small
businesses, universities, and individual
inventors; (5) legal and constitutional
issues with placing trade secret law in
patent law; and (6) whether or not the
change to a first-to-file patent system
creates any particular need for prior
user rights. To assist in gathering this
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information, the USPTO is holding a
public hearing at which interested
members of the public are invited to
testify on the issues outlined above and
in the supplementary information
section of this notice. In addition,
members of the public may submit
written comments.
Public Hearing: A public hearing will
be held on Tuesday, October 25, 2011,
beginning at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight
Time (EDT) and ending at 11:30 a.m.
EDT. The public hearing will be held at
the USPTO, Madison Auditorium,
Concourse Level, Madison Building, 600
Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314.
Those wishing to present oral
testimony at the hearing must request an
opportunity to do so in writing by email to IP.Policy@uspto.gov no later
than October 18, 2011. Requests to
testify at the hearing must indicate the
following information: (1) The name of
the person desiring to testify; (2) the
person’s contact information (telephone
number and electronic mail address);
and (3) the organization(s) the person
represents, if any; and (4) a preliminary
written copy of their testimony. Based
on the requests received, an agenda of
scheduled testimony will be sent to
testifying respondents, and posted on
the USPTO Internet Web site (address:
https://www.uspto.gov/
americainventsact).
Speakers selected to provide
testimony at the hearing should provide
a final written copy of their testimony
for inclusion in the record of the
proceedings no later than October 21,
2011.
The USPTO plans to make the public
hearing available via webcast. Webcast
information will be available on the
USPTO’s Internet Web site (address:
https://www.uspto.gov/
americainventsact) before the public
hearing.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2011 / Notices
Written Comments: Written comments
should be sent by e-mail to
IP.Policy@uspto.gov. Comments may
also be submitted by postal mail
addressed to: Mail Stop OPEA, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450,
ATTN: Elizabeth Shaw. Although
comments may be submitted by postal
mail, the USPTO prefers to receive
comments via e-mail. The deadline for
receipt of written comments for
consideration by the USPTO is
November 8, 2011. Written comments
should be identified in the subject line
of the e-mail or postal mailing as ‘‘Prior
User Rights.’’
Because comments will be made
available for public inspection,
information that is not desired to be
made public, such as an address or
phone number, should not be included
in the comments.
Availability of Hearing Transcript and
Written Comments: A transcript of the
hearing and the written comments will
be available for public inspection at the
Office of Policy and External Affairs in
the Executive Library located in the
Madison West Building, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314. Contact: Elizabeth Shaw at
elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571–272–
8494. In addition, the hearing transcript
and the comments from the public will
also be available via the USPTO Internet
Web site (address: https://
www.uspto.gov/americainventsact).
Contact: Mary Critharis, Office of
Policy and External Affairs, by phone
571–272–9300; by e-mail at
mary.critharis@uspto.gov; or by postal
mail addressed to: Mail Stop OPEA,
United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria,
Virginia 22313–1450, ATTN: Mary
Critharis; or Charles Eloshway, Office of
Policy and External Affairs, by phone at
571–272–9300; by e-mail at
charles.eloshway@uspto.gov; or by
postal mail addressed to: Mail Stop
OPEA, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450,
ATTN: Charles Eloshway.
The America Invents Act, Section 3,
calls for the Director of the USPTO to
report to the Committee on the Judiciary
of the Senate and the Committee on the
Judiciary of the House of
Representatives regarding findings and
recommendations on the operations of
prior user rights in selected countries in
the industrialized world no later than
the end of the four-month period
beginning on the date of enactment of
the Act (i.e., by January 16, 2012). In
preparing the report, the USPTO is
required to consult with the United
States Trade Representative, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Oct 06, 2011
Jkt 226001
Secretary of State, and the Attorney
General. The Act also specifically
identifies items for USPTO
consideration as part of the report.
Issues for Testimony and/or Written
Comment: Interested members of the
public are invited to submit testimony
and/or written comments on issues that
they believe relevant to operation of
prior user rights. The topics and
questions listed below reflect the
information that the USPTO is required
to study per the prior user rights study
provision of the America Invents Act.
The tenor of the following questions
should not be taken as an indication
that the USPTO has taken a position or
is predisposed to any particular views.
1a. Please share your experiences
relating to the use of prior user rights in
foreign jurisdictions including, but not
limited to, members of the European
Union and Japan, Canada, and
Australia.
In doing so, please include the
following:
(a) An identification of the foreign
jurisdiction(s);
(b) The frequency or regularity with
which prior user rights were utilized or
asserted in the particular jurisdiction(s);
(c) Whether prior user rights were
asserted as a defense by you or your
organization;
(d) Whether another entity alleged
prior user rights as a defense to a patent
infringement claim asserted by you or
your organization;
(e) The technology or industry
involved;
(f) The operation of the prior user
rights regime in the particular
jurisdiction(s); and
(g) The advantages/disadvantages of
the prior user rights regime in the
particular jurisdiction(s).
1b. If you do not have any experiences
relating to the use of prior user rights in
foreign jurisdictions, please identify the
following:
(a) The frequency or regularity with
which you engage in business abroad
including, but limited to, the following
foreign economies: members of the
European Union and Japan, Canada, and
Australia;
(b) Your opinion as to why you
believe prior user rights are or are not
needed in the particular jurisdiction(s).
2. Please share your experiences in
analyzing the effect, if any, of prior user
rights on innovation rates in selected
countries including, but not limited to,
members of the European Union and
Japan, Canada, and Australia. Please
include empirical and anecdotal data, as
well as opinions as to how this analysis
may be conducted.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62389
3. Please share your experiences in
analyzing the correlation, if any,
between prior user rights and start-up
enterprises and the ability to attract
venture capital to start new companies.
Please include empirical and anecdotal
data, as well as opinions as to how this
analysis may be conducted.
4. Please share your experiences in
analyzing the effect, if any, of prior user
rights on small businesses, universities,
and individual inventors. Please include
empirical and anecdotal data, as well as
opinions as to how this analysis may be
conducted.
5. Please share your views, along with
any corresponding analysis, as to
whether there are any legal or
constitutional issues with placing trade
secret law in United States patent law.
6. Please share your views, along with
any corresponding analysis, as to
whether the change to a first-to-file
patent system creates any particular
need for prior user rights in the United
States.
Dated: October 4, 2011.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2011–26154 Filed 10–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2011–0062]
Request for Comments and Notice of
Public Hearings on the Study of
International Patent Protection for
Small Businesses
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) is interested
in gathering information on
international patent protection for small
businesses for purposes of preparing a
report on the subject as required by the
America Invents Act. To assist in
gathering this information, the USPTO
is holding a public hearing at which
interested members of the public are
invited to testify on this topic. In
addition, members of the public may
submit written comments.
Public Hearing: The USPTO will hold
two hearings in support of the study of
international patent protection for small
businesses. The first public hearing will
be held on October 27, 2011, beginning
at 1 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT)
and ending at 4 p.m. EDT. The first
public hearing will be held at the
USPTO in the Madison Auditorium on
the concourse level of the Madison
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62388-62389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26154]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No.: PTO-P-2011-0060]
Notice of Public Hearing and Request for Comments on the Study of
Prior User Rights
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is interested
in gathering information on patent prior user rights for purposes of
preparing a report on the subject as required by the America Invents
Act. In particular, the USPTO seeks information about the following as
specified in the America Invents Act: (1) Comparison(s) between the
patent laws of the United States and the laws of other industrialized
countries; (2) the effect of prior user rights on innovation rates; (3)
the correlation, if any, between prior user rights and start-up
enterprises as well as the ability to attract venture capital to start
new companies; (4) the effect of prior user rights, if any, on small
businesses, universities, and individual inventors; (5) legal and
constitutional issues with placing trade secret law in patent law; and
(6) whether or not the change to a first-to-file patent system creates
any particular need for prior user rights. To assist in gathering this
information, the USPTO is holding a public hearing at which interested
members of the public are invited to testify on the issues outlined
above and in the supplementary information section of this notice. In
addition, members of the public may submit written comments.
Public Hearing: A public hearing will be held on Tuesday, October
25, 2011, beginning at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) and ending
at 11:30 a.m. EDT. The public hearing will be held at the USPTO,
Madison Auditorium, Concourse Level, Madison Building, 600 Dulany
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314.
Those wishing to present oral testimony at the hearing must request
an opportunity to do so in writing by e-mail to IP.Policy@uspto.gov no
later than October 18, 2011. Requests to testify at the hearing must
indicate the following information: (1) The name of the person desiring
to testify; (2) the person's contact information (telephone number and
electronic mail address); and (3) the organization(s) the person
represents, if any; and (4) a preliminary written copy of their
testimony. Based on the requests received, an agenda of scheduled
testimony will be sent to testifying respondents, and posted on the
USPTO Internet Web site (address: https://www.uspto.gov/americainventsact).
Speakers selected to provide testimony at the hearing should
provide a final written copy of their testimony for inclusion in the
record of the proceedings no later than October 21, 2011.
The USPTO plans to make the public hearing available via webcast.
Webcast information will be available on the USPTO's Internet Web site
(address: https://www.uspto.gov/americainventsact) before the public
hearing.
[[Page 62389]]
Written Comments: Written comments should be sent by e-mail to
IP.Policy@uspto.gov. Comments may also be submitted by postal mail
addressed to: Mail Stop OPEA, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450,
ATTN: Elizabeth Shaw. Although comments may be submitted by postal
mail, the USPTO prefers to receive comments via e-mail. The deadline
for receipt of written comments for consideration by the USPTO is
November 8, 2011. Written comments should be identified in the subject
line of the e-mail or postal mailing as ``Prior User Rights.''
Because comments will be made available for public inspection,
information that is not desired to be made public, such as an address
or phone number, should not be included in the comments.
Availability of Hearing Transcript and Written Comments: A
transcript of the hearing and the written comments will be available
for public inspection at the Office of Policy and External Affairs in
the Executive Library located in the Madison West Building, Tenth
Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Contact:
Elizabeth Shaw at elizabeth.shaw2@uspto.gov or 571-272-8494. In
addition, the hearing transcript and the comments from the public will
also be available via the USPTO Internet Web site (address: https://www.uspto.gov/americainventsact).
Contact: Mary Critharis, Office of Policy and External Affairs, by
phone 571-272-9300; by e-mail at mary.critharis@uspto.gov; or by postal
mail addressed to: Mail Stop OPEA, United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450, ATTN: Mary
Critharis; or Charles Eloshway, Office of Policy and External Affairs,
by phone at 571-272-9300; by e-mail at charles.eloshway@uspto.gov; or
by postal mail addressed to: Mail Stop OPEA, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450, ATTN:
Charles Eloshway.
The America Invents Act, Section 3, calls for the Director of the
USPTO to report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the
Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives regarding
findings and recommendations on the operations of prior user rights in
selected countries in the industrialized world no later than the end of
the four-month period beginning on the date of enactment of the Act
(i.e., by January 16, 2012). In preparing the report, the USPTO is
required to consult with the United States Trade Representative, the
Secretary of State, and the Attorney General. The Act also specifically
identifies items for USPTO consideration as part of the report.
Issues for Testimony and/or Written Comment: Interested members of
the public are invited to submit testimony and/or written comments on
issues that they believe relevant to operation of prior user rights.
The topics and questions listed below reflect the information that the
USPTO is required to study per the prior user rights study provision of
the America Invents Act. The tenor of the following questions should
not be taken as an indication that the USPTO has taken a position or is
predisposed to any particular views.
1a. Please share your experiences relating to the use of prior user
rights in foreign jurisdictions including, but not limited to, members
of the European Union and Japan, Canada, and Australia.
In doing so, please include the following:
(a) An identification of the foreign jurisdiction(s);
(b) The frequency or regularity with which prior user rights were
utilized or asserted in the particular jurisdiction(s);
(c) Whether prior user rights were asserted as a defense by you or
your organization;
(d) Whether another entity alleged prior user rights as a defense
to a patent infringement claim asserted by you or your organization;
(e) The technology or industry involved;
(f) The operation of the prior user rights regime in the particular
jurisdiction(s); and
(g) The advantages/disadvantages of the prior user rights regime in
the particular jurisdiction(s).
1b. If you do not have any experiences relating to the use of prior
user rights in foreign jurisdictions, please identify the following:
(a) The frequency or regularity with which you engage in business
abroad including, but limited to, the following foreign economies:
members of the European Union and Japan, Canada, and Australia;
(b) Your opinion as to why you believe prior user rights are or are
not needed in the particular jurisdiction(s).
2. Please share your experiences in analyzing the effect, if any,
of prior user rights on innovation rates in selected countries
including, but not limited to, members of the European Union and Japan,
Canada, and Australia. Please include empirical and anecdotal data, as
well as opinions as to how this analysis may be conducted.
3. Please share your experiences in analyzing the correlation, if
any, between prior user rights and start-up enterprises and the ability
to attract venture capital to start new companies. Please include
empirical and anecdotal data, as well as opinions as to how this
analysis may be conducted.
4. Please share your experiences in analyzing the effect, if any,
of prior user rights on small businesses, universities, and individual
inventors. Please include empirical and anecdotal data, as well as
opinions as to how this analysis may be conducted.
5. Please share your views, along with any corresponding analysis,
as to whether there are any legal or constitutional issues with placing
trade secret law in United States patent law.
6. Please share your views, along with any corresponding analysis,
as to whether the change to a first-to-file patent system creates any
particular need for prior user rights in the United States.
Dated: October 4, 2011.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-26154 Filed 10-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P